Spectral characteristics of blink suppression in normal observers

Eye blinks as a visual processing stage

Humans blink their eyes frequently during normal viewing, more often than it seems necessary for keeping the cornea well lubricated. Since the closure of the eyelid disrupts the image on the retina, eye blinks are commonly assumed to be detrimental to visual processing. However, blinks also provide luminance transients rich in spatial information to neural pathways highly sensitive to temporal changes. Here, we report that the luminance modulations from blinks enhance visual sensitivity. By coupling high-resolution eye tracking in human observers with modeling of blink transients and spectral analysis of visual input signals, we show that blinking increases the power of retinal stimulation and that this effect significantly enhances visibility despite the time lost in exposure to the external scene. We further show that, as predicted from the spectral content of input signals, this enhancement is selective for stimuli at low spatial frequencies and occurs irrespective of whether the luminance transients are actively generated or passively experienced. These findings indicate that, like eye movements, blinking acts as a computational component of a visual processing strategy that uses motor behavior to reformat spatial information into the temporal domain.

The perceptual consequences and neurophysiology of eye blinks

A hand passing in front of a camera produces a large and obvious disruption of a video. Yet the closure of the eyelid during a blink, which lasts for hundreds of milliseconds and occurs thousands of times per day, typically goes unnoticed. What are the neural mechanisms that mediate our uninterrupted visual experience despite frequent occlusion of the eyes? Here, we review the existing literature on the neurophysiology, perceptual consequences, and behavioral dynamics of blinks. We begin by detailing the kinematics of the eyelid that define a blink. We next discuss the ways in which blinks alter visual function by occluding the pupil, decreasing visual sensitivity, and moving the eyes. Then, to anchor our understanding, we review the similarities between blinks and other actions that lead to reductions in visual sensitivity, such as saccadic eye movements. The similarity between these two actions has led to suggestions that they share a common neural substrate. We consider the extent of overlap in their neural circuits and go on to explain how recent findings regarding saccade suppression cast doubt on the strong version of the shared mechanism hypothesis. We also evaluate alternative explanations of how blink-related processes modulate neural activity to maintain visual stability: a reverberating corticothalamic loop to maintain information in the face of lid closure; and a suppression of visual transients related to lid closure. Next, we survey the many areas throughout the brain that contribute to the execution of, regulation of, or response to blinks. Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, blinks drastically attenuate our visual abilities, yet these perturbations fail to reach awareness. We conclude by outlining opportunities for future work to better understand how the brain maintains visual perception in the face of eye blinks. Future work will likely benefit from incorporating theories of perceptual stability, neurophysiology, and novel behavior paradigms to address issues central to our understanding of natural visual behavior and for the clinical rehabilitation of active vision.

Reading with a filtered fovea: the influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading

Reading relies critically on processing text in foveal vision during brief fixational pauses, and high-quality visual input from foveal text is fundamental to theories of reading. However, the quality of visual input from foveal text that is actually functional for reading and the effects of this input on reading performance are unclear. To investigate these issues, a moving, gaze-contingent foveal filtering technique was developed to display areas of text within foveal vision that provided only coarse, medium, or fine scale visual input during each fixational pause during reading. Normal reading times were unaffected when foveal text up to three characters wide at the point of fixation provided any one visual input (coarse, medium, or fine). Wider areas of coarse visual input lengthened reading times, but reading still occurred, and normal reading times were completely unaffected when only medium or fine visual input extended across the entire fovea. Further analyses revealed that each visual input had no effect on the number of fixations made when normal text was read, that adjusting fixation durations helped preserve reading efficiency for different visual inputs, and that each visual input had virtually no effect on normal saccades. These findings indicate that, despite the resolving power of foveal vision and the emphasis placed on high-quality foveal visual input by theories of reading, normal reading functions with similar success using a range of restricted visual inputs from foveal text, even at the point of fixation. Some implications of these findings for theories of reading are discussed.

Spontaneous eyeblink activity

Spontaneous blinking is essential for maintaining a healthy ocular surface and clarity of vision. The spontaneous blink rate (SBR) is believed to reflect a complex interaction between peripheral influences mediated by the eye surface and the central dopaminergic activity. The SBR is thus extremely variable and dependent on a variety of psychological and medical conditions. Many different methods have been employed to measure the SBR and the upper eyelid kinematics during a blink movement. Each has its own merits and drawbacks, and the choice of a specific method should be tailored to the specific needs of the investigation. Although the sequence of muscle events that leads to a blink has been fully described, knowledge about the neural control of spontaneous blinking activity is not complete. The tear film is dynamically modified between blinks, and abnormalities of the blink rate have an obvious influence on the ocular surface.

Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness

When viewing a different stimulus with each eye, we experience the remarkable phenomenon of binocular rivalry: alternations in consciousness between the stimuli [1, 2]. According to a popular theory first proposed in 1901, neurons encoding the two stimuli engage in reciprocal inhibition [3-8] so that those processing one stimulus inhibit those processing the other, yielding consciousness of one dominant stimulus at any moment and suppressing the other. Also according to the theory, neurons encoding the dominant stimulus adapt, weakening their activity and the inhibition they can exert, whereas neurons encoding the suppressed stimulus recover from adaptation until the balance of activity reverses, triggering an alternation in consciousness. Despite its popularity, this theory has one glaring inconsistency with data: during an episode of suppression, visual sensitivity to brief probe stimuli in the dominant eye should decrease over time and should increase in the suppressed eye, yet sensitivity appears to be constant [9, 10]. Using more appropriate probe stimuli (experiment 1) in conjunction with a new method (experiment 2), we found that sensitivities in dominance and suppression do show the predicted complementary changes.

Synchronization of spontaneous eyeblinks while viewing video stories

Blinks are generally suppressed during a task that requires visual attention and tend to occur immediately before or after the task when the timing of its onset and offset are explicitly given. During the viewing of video stories, blinks are expected to occur at explicit breaks such as scene changes. However, given that the scene length is unpredictable, there should also be appropriate timing for blinking within a scene to prevent temporal loss of critical visual information. Here, we show that spontaneous blinks were highly synchronized between and within subjects when they viewed the same short video stories, but were not explicitly tied to the scene breaks. Synchronized blinks occurred during scenes that required less attention such as at the conclusion of an action, during the absence of the main character, during a long shot and during repeated presentations of a similar scene. In contrast, blink synchronization was not observed when subjects viewed a background video or when they listened to a story read aloud. The results suggest that humans share a mechanism for controlling the timing of blinks that searches for an implicit timing that is appropriate to minimize the chance of losing critical information while viewing a stream of visual events.

Voluntary eyeblinks disrupt iconic memory

In the present research, we investigated whether eyeblinks interfere with cognitive processing. In Experiment 1, the participants performed a partial-report iconic memory task in which a letter array was presented for 106 msec, followed 50, 150, or 750 msec later by a tone that cued recall of onerow of the array. At a cue delay of 50 msec between array offset and cue onset, letter report accuracy was lower when the participants blinked following array presentation than under no-blink conditions; the participants made more mislocation errors under blink conditions. This result suggests that blinking interferes with the binding of object identity and object position in iconic memory. Experiment 2 demonstrated that interference due to blinks was not due merely to changes in light intensity. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated that other motor responses did not interfere with iconic memory. We propose a new phenomenon, cognitive blink suppression, in which blinking inhibits cognitive processing. This phenomenon may be due to neural interference. Blinks reduce activation in area V1, which may interfere with the representation of information in iconic memory.

Vision: in the blink of an eye

Although we blink every 4 to 6 seconds, we notice neither the act of blinking nor the mini-blackouts they cause. A new study using imaging techniques identifies the neural structures in humans involved in suppressing vision processing and visual awareness during blinking.

Two distinct neural effects of blinking on human visual processing

Humans blink every few seconds, yet the changes in retinal illumination during a blink are rarely noticed, perhaps because visual sensitivity is suppressed. Furthermore, despite the loss of visual input, visual experience remains continuous across blinks. The neural mechanisms in humans underlying these two phenomena of blink suppression and visual continuity are unknown. We investigated the neural basis of these two complementary behavioural effects using functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure how voluntary blinking affected cortical responses to visual stimulation. Two factors were independently manipulated in a blocked design; the presence/absence of voluntary blinking, and the presence/absence of visual stimulation. To control for the simple loss of visual input caused by eyelid closure, we created a fifth condition where external darkenings were dynamically matched to each subjects' own blinks. Areas of lateral occipital cortex, including area V5/MT, showed suppression of responses to visual stimulation during blinking, consistent with the known loss in visual sensitivity. In contrast, a medial parieto-occipital region, homologous to macaque area V6A, showed responses to blinks that increased when visual stimulation was present. Our data are consistent with a role for this region in the active maintenance of visual continuity across blinks. Moreover, both suppression in lateral occipital and activation in medial parieto-occipital cortex were greater during blinks than during matched external darkenings of the visual scene, suggesting that they result from an extra-retinal signal associated with the blink motor command. Our findings therefore suggest two distinct neural correlates of blinking on human visual processing.

Short-term Effects of Artificial Tears on Visual Performance in Normal Subjects

PURPOSE

Temporal changes in tear film structure can distort the optical wavefront as it passes through the tear layer and reduce contrast sensitivity. Theoretically, any substance applied to the tear layer that alters its structure could affect contrast sensitivity. The purpose of this study is to investigate how different formulations of carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC) applied to the tear layer affect contrast sensitivity over time. Additionally, the visual effect of these drops applied over soft and rigid, gas-permeable contact lenses was also investigated.

METHODS

Twenty normal subjects took part in this project. Refresh Celluvisc (Allergan, Irvine, CA, 1.0% high-viscosity CMC) was compared with Refresh Liquigel (Allergan, 1.0% total CMC made by blending 0.35% high-viscosity with 0.65% medium viscosity CMC). Ten of the subjects were habitual soft contact lens wearers and 10 were habitual gas-permeable lens wearers. The stimulus, viewed monocularly, was a stationary, vertically oriented, sine wave grating (14 CPD). A temporal, two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm combined with a self-paced method of limits was used to monitor threshold over time. After baseline data collection, a drop of the artificial tear was applied to the tear layer and the procedure continued for 30 min. This allowed continual tracking of the threshold. Data were collected while viewing the stimulus with the subject's contact lens or with their spectacle prescription.

RESULTS

One drop of Liquigel or Celluvisc decreased contrast sensitivity for a 14 CPD sine wave grating (all p values < 0.005). This decrease in contrast sensitivity was observed during spectacle, soft contact lens, and gas-permeable contact lens wear. Soft contact lens wear resulted in a greater decrease in contrast sensitivity than spectacles when Liquigel was applied to the tear layer. None of the other conditions were different between contact lens and spectacle wear. The return to baseline contrast sensitivity was not significantly different between soft or gas-permeable contact lens wear and spectacles for either Liquigel or Celluvisc. In general, Celluvisc had a greater effect on visual performance than Liquigel.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that Liquigel and Celluvisc alter the tear layer and affect contrast sensitivity. The results agree with patient observations that Celluvisc causes a moderate amount of blur that gradually subsides. In such patients, the shorter duration of blur with Liquigel (about half that of Celluvisc) may be more acceptable. The technique of blending various viscosity CMC materials while maintaining the total CMC concentration of 1.0% may be beneficial in dry eye therapy without causing excessive blur to patients.

Different effects of eyelid blinks and target blanking on saccadic suppression of displacement

Displacements of visual stimuli during saccadic eye movements are often not noticed. We have demonstrated that saccadic suppression of image displacement can be eliminated by blanking the stimulus for a short period during and after the saccade (Deubel, Schneider, & Bridgeman, 1996). Here we report an experiment in which target visibility was interrupted after the saccade, either by distal target blanking or by voluntary eyeblink. The data show that the effect of blinking is different from blanking; interruption of vision due to a blink did not enable subjects to detect target displacements any better than they had done in the no-blank condition. The results provide evidence for an extraretinal signal that distinguishes between endogenous and exogenous sources of temporary object disappearance after the saccade.

Blink effects on ongoing smooth pursuit eye movements in humans

Blinks are known to affect eye movements, e.g., saccades, slow and fast vergence, and saccade-vergence interaction, in two ways: by superimposition of blink-associated eye movements and changes of the central premotor activity in the brainstem. The goal of this study was to determine, for the first time, the effects of trigeminal evoked blinks on ongoing smooth pursuit eye movements which could be related to visual sensory or premotor neuronal changes. This was compared to the effect of a target disappearing for 100-300 ms duration during ongoing smooth pursuit (blank paradigm) in order to control for the visual sensory effects of a blink. Eye and blink movements were recorded in eight healthy subjects with the scleral search coil technique. Blink-associated eye movements during the first 50% of the blink duration were non-linearly superimposed on the smooth pursuit eye movements. Immediately after the blink-associated eye movements, the pursuit velocity slowly decreased by an average of 3.2+/-2.1 degrees /s. This decrease was not dependent on the stimulus direction. The pursuit velocity decrease caused by blinks which occluded the pupil more than 50% could be explained mostly by blanking the visual target. However, small blinks that did not occlude the pupil (<10% of lid closure) also decreased smooth pursuit velocity. Thus, this blink effect on pursuit velocity cannot be explained by blink-associated eye movements or by the blink having blanked the visual input. We propose that part of this effect might either be caused by incomplete visual suppression during blinks and/or a change in the activity of omnipause neurons.

Contact lens drying and visual performance: the vision cycle with contact lenses

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of precontact lens tear film break-up on visual performance.

METHODS

Four asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers had contrast sensitivity measured by a temporal, two-alternative, force choice paradigm combined with a self-paced methods of limits. Stimuli were vertically orientated sine wave gratings (0.5 to 14 cycles per degree [cpd] presented for 16.67 ms. Contrast sensitivity was measured before precontact lens tear break-up by a stimuli presented 2 s after the blink. A post-tear layer break-up measurement taken with the stimuli presented after break-up had been observed by the use of a video camera attached to a Tearscope.

RESULTS

Contrast sensitivity was found to be reduced following precontact lens tear film break-up for stimuli of 4, 6, and 10 cpd; the data approached significance at 14 cpd. Further reductions in contrast sensitivity were observed for one subject when measurements were continued for 4 s following break-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast sensitivity is significantly reduced for middle to high spatial frequencies when the precontact lens tear film dries and breaks up. The combination of observations of visual performance immediately following the blink (from earlier experiments) and measurements following tear film break-up in this experiment allows description of a "vision cycle" for contact lens wearers in the interval between blinks. It is suggested that break-up of the precontact lens tear film could account for the complaints of intermittent blurred vision in some contact lens wearers and may provide a stimulus to blinking in these individuals.

Activity of primate V1 cortical neurons during blinks

Every time we blink our eyes, the image on the retina goes almost completely dark. And yet we hardly notice these interruptions, even though an external darkening is startling. Intuitively it would seem that if our perception is continuous, then the neuronal activity on which our perceptions are based should also be continuous. To explore this issue, we compared the responses of 63 supragranular V1 neurons recorded from two awake monkeys for four conditions: 1) constant stimulus, 2) during a reflex blink, 3) during a gap in the visual stimulus, and 4) during an external darkening when an electrooptical shutter occluded the entire scene. We show here that the activity of neurons in visual cortical area V1 is essentially shut off during a blink. In the 100-ms epoch starting 70 ms after the stimulus was interrupted, the firing rate was 27.2 +/- 2.7 spikes/s (SE) for a constant stimulus, 8.2 +/- 0.9 spikes/s for a reflex blink, 17.3 +/- 1.9 spikes/s for a gap, and 12.7 +/- 1.4 spikes/s for an external darkening. The responses during a blink are less than during an external darkening (P < 0.05, t-test). However, many of these neurons responded with a transient burst of activity to the onset of an external darkening and not to a blink, suggesting that it is the suppression of this transient which causes us to ignore blinks. This is consistent with other studies where the presence of transient bursts of activity correlates with the perceived visibility of a stimulus.

Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties

Visual detection and discrimination thresholds are often measured using adaptive staircases, and most studies use transformed (or weighted) up/down methods with fixed step sizes--in the spirit of Wetherill and Levitt (Br J Mathemat Statist Psychol 1965;18:1-10) or Kaernbach (Percept Psychophys 1991;49:227-229)--instead of changing step size at each trial in accordance with best-placement rules--in the spirit of Watson and Pelli (Percept Psychophys 1983;47:87-91). It is generally assumed that a fixed-step-size (FSS) staircase converges on the stimulus level at which a correct response occurs with the probabilities derived by Wetherill and Levitt or Kaernbach, but this has never been proved rigorously. This work used simulation techniques to determine the asymptotic and small-sample convergence of FSS staircases as a function of such parameters as the up/down rule, the size of the steps up or down, the starting stimulus level, or the spread of the psychometric function. The results showed that the asymptotic convergence of FSS staircases depends much more on the sizes of the steps than it does on the up/down rule. Yet, if the size delta+ of a step up differs from the size delta- of a step down in a way that the ratio delta-/delta+ is constant at a specific value that changes with up/down rule, then convergence percent-correct is unaffected by the absolute sizes of the steps. For use with the popular one-, two-, three- and four-down/one-up rules, these ratios must respectively be set at 0.2845, 0.5488, 0.7393 and 0.8415, rendering staircases that converge on the 77.85%-, 80.35%-, 83.15%- and 85.84%-correct points. Wetherill and Levitt's transformed up/down rules--which require delta-/delta+ = 1--and the general version of Kaernbach's weighted up/down rule--which allows any delta-/delta+ ratio--fail to reach their presumed targets. The small-sample study showed that, even with the optimal settings, short FSS staircases (up to 20 reversals in length) are subject to some bias, and their precision is less than reasonable, but their characteristics improve when the size delta+ of a step up is larger than half the spread of the psychometric function. Practical recommendations are given for the design of efficient and trustworthy FSS staircases.

A comparison of saccadic and blink suppression in normal observers

Recent research suggests that blink and saccadic suppression are produced by the same mechanism (Volkmann, 1986; Uchikawa & Sato, 1995; Ridder & Tomlinson, 1993, 1995). These studies demonstrated that blink and saccadic suppression have the same effect on various visual functions. However, none of these studies made a comparison of blink and saccadic suppression in the same individual. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of blink and saccadic suppression on contrast sensitivity functions in the same subject. The effect of saccadic suppression on the contrast sensitivity function in three normal observers was determined. Employing a two-alternative, forced-choice technique, thresholds were measured for seven spatial frequencies. At each spatial frequency, the threshold was determined immediately following detection of a voluntary saccade. The magnitude of suppression was taken as the log ratio of the contrast sensitivities obtained while foveating the stimulus and those obtained during saccades. The magnitude of saccadic suppression was found to increase as the saccade amplitude increased and to be spatial-frequency dependent. Low spatial frequencies were suppressed more than high spatial frequencies. The blink suppression data have been measured previously (Ridder & Tomlinson, 1993). Saccadic and blink suppression were qualitatively similar. A vertical shift of the data brought the saccadic and blink suppression data into register. These results suggest that blink and saccadic suppression are produced by the same or similar mechanisms.

Lack of visual suppression in the rabbit lateral geniculate nucleus during blink reflex

Stimulation of the supraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve (SO) elicited eye blinks in the rabbit, but did not decrease the amplitude of visual cortical evoked potential from stimulation of the optic chiasm (OX). In addition, the SO stimulation neither induced an inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) in LGN cells, nor activated inhibitory interneurons in the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), which proved to mediate both recurrent inhibition and saccadic suppression in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). All these indicate that there is no visual suppression in the rabbit LGN during blink reflex.

Very short-term visual memory via reverberation: a role for the cortico-thalamic excitatory circuit in temporal filling-in during blinks and saccades?

There is a large projection of neurons from Layer VI of V1 that makes excitatory connections on LGN relay cells. It has been proposed that this circuit is involved in signal processing and thalamic sensitivity regulation. Alternatively, Crick has suggested that the circuit could be a reverberatory loop-a site for very short-term (iconic) visual memory. This hypothesis is shown to be plausible if the reverberation is keyed to the onset of neurally initiated visual disruptions such as blinks and saccades. Neural mechanisms suppress perception during these events but little is known about temporal filling-in processes analogous to the mechanisms that fill-in spatial scotomas. Crick's reverberatory loop could provide a process for filling-in temporal scotomas with information acquired just before the disruption, thus maintaining the continuity of visual experience.

Suppression of the magnocellular pathway during saccades

Saccades create two problems for the visual system: they cause fast (but resolvable) motion of the retinal image and a change in the relationship between retinal and external spatial co-ordinates. In this review, we examine the first of these problems, of why there is no distributing sense of motion during saccades. Recent evidence from a range of sources suggests that during saccades, the magnocellular pathway is selectively suppressed, while the parvocellular pathway is functionally unimpaired, or even enhanced. The suppression seems to occur early, possibly in the lateral geniculate nucleus, where the pathways are well separated. It is possible that the suppression shares similar mechanisms to those responsible for contrast gain control.

Temporal impulse response functions for luminance and colour during saccades

Previous work has shown that during saccadic eye movements, contrast sensitivity for low spatial frequency patterns modulated in luminance is selectively reduced by up to one logarithmic unit, while high spatial frequency patterns, and equiluminant patterns of all spatial frequencies are not suppressed at all [Burr et al. (1994). Nature, 371, 511-513]. Here we study the temporal characteristics for sensitivity to luminance and chromatic patterns during saccades, using the two-pulse summation technique. Sensitivity was measured for detecting two successive pulses as a function of stimulus-onset asynchrony, during normal viewing and during saccades. Impulse response functions were estimated from the summation data, for all conditions. For equiluminance, the functions were monophasic during normal viewing and saccades. For luminance modulation, the impulse response functions were di-phasic in both normal viewing and saccades. However, during saccades the impulse responses were faster in normal viewing. This result is consistent with the suggestion that saccadic suppression is mediated by contrast gain control mechanisms, known to occur in M-cells but not P-cells.