Lipoprotein(a) inhibition of plasminogen activation by tissue-type plasminogen activator

Lipoprotein(a) the Insurgent: A New Insight into the Structure, Function, Metabolism, Pathogenicity, and Medications Affecting Lipoprotein(a) Molecule

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], aka "Lp little a", was discovered in the 1960s in the lab of the Norwegian physician Kåre Berg. Since then, we have greatly improved our knowledge of lipids and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) is an enigmatic class of lipoprotein that is exclusively formed in the liver and comprises two main components, a single copy of apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 (apo-B100) tethered to a single copy of a protein denoted as apolipoprotein(a) apo(a). Plasma levels of Lp(a) increase soon after birth to a steady concentration within a few months of life. In adults, Lp(a) levels range widely from <2 to 2500 mg/L. Evidence that elevated Lp(a) levels >300 mg/L contribute to CVD is significant. The improvement of isoform-independent assays, together with the insight from epidemiologic studies, meta-analyses, genome-wide association studies, and Mendelian randomization studies, has established Lp(a) as the single most common independent genetically inherited causal risk factor for CVD. This breakthrough elevated Lp(a) from a biomarker of atherosclerotic risk to a target of therapy. With the emergence of promising second-generation antisense therapy, we hope that we can answer the question of whether Lp(a) is ready for prime-time clinic use. In this review, we present an update on the metabolism, pathophysiology, and current/future medical interventions for high levels of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) as an Old and New Causal Risk Factor of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], discovered in 1963, has been associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) independent of other traditional risk factors, including LDL cholesterol. Lp(a) is an apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoprotein, which contains an LDL-like particle. Unlike LDL, which is a primary therapeutic target to decrease ASCVD, current guidelines recommend measuring Lp(a) for risk assessments because there is no clear evidence demonstrating the clinical benefit of decreasing Lp(a) using classical drugs such as niacin. However, recent Mendelian randomization studies indicate that Lp(a) causally correlates with ASCVD. In addition, novel drugs, including PCSK9 inhibitors, as well as antisense oligonucleotide for apo(a), have exhibited efficacy in decreasing Lp(a) substantially, invigorating a discussion whether Lp(a) could be a novel therapeutic target for further ASCVD risk reduction. This review aims to provide current understanding, and future perspectives, of Lp(a), which is currently considered a mere biomarker but may emerge as a novel therapeutic target in future clinical settings.

Is Lp(a) ready for prime time use in the clinic? A pros-and-cons debate

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is a cholesterol-rich lipoprotein known since 1963. In spite of extensive research on Lp(a), there are still numerous gaps in our knowledge relating to its function, biosynthesis and catabolism. One reason for this might be that apo(a), the characteristic glycoprotein of Lp(a), is expressed only in primates. Results from experiments using transgenic animals therefore may need verification in humans. Studies on Lp(a) are also handicapped by the great number of isoforms of apo(a) and the heterogeneity of apo(a)-containing fractions in plasma. Quantification of Lp(a) in the clinical laboratory for a long time has not been standardized. Starting from its discovery, reports accumulated that Lp(a) contributed to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Early reports were based on case control studies but in the last decades a great deal of prospective studies have been published that highlight the increased risk for CVD and MI in patients with elevated Lp(a). Final answers to the question of whether Lp(a) is ready for wider clinical use will come from intervention studies with novel selective Lp(a) lowering medications that are currently underway. This article expounds arguments for and against this proposition from currently available data.

Syndromes of Thrombosis and Hypercoagulability: Congenital and Acquired Thrombophilias

This article stresses the common hereditary and acquired blood protein defects associated with thrombosis. The most common of the hereditary defects apear to be APC-R, SPS, antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiency, and the most common acquired defects are anticardiolipin antibodies and the lupus anticoagulant (antiphospholipid antibodies). Therefore, these are the defects that should first be looked for in an individual with unexplained thrombosis. If these more common defects are not found, then the rarer defects including HC II, plasminogen or TPA deficiency, dysfibrinogenemia, el evated PAI-1 and hyperhomocysteinemia should be sought. The importance of finding these defects has significant impli cations for therapy of the individual patient and for institutions of family studies to identify, inform, and possibly treat others at risk. It is expected that as knowledge of hemostasis expands, more hereditary and acquired defects, such as elevated lipopro tein (a) or defects of extrinsic (tissue factor) pathway inhibitor (EPI, TFPI), may be associated with enhanced risks of throm bosis. Finally, it must be recalled that a diagnosis of thrombo sis, like that of anemia, is only a generic and partial diagnosis; just as in the anemic patient, the etiology must be clearly de fined. Only in this manner can cost-effective and appropriate therapy for both primary treatment and secondary prevention be designed. In addition, the demonstration of a hereditary defect will allow primary prevention in afflicted family mem bers by allowing the choice of appropriate therapy.

Lipoprotein (a): truly a direct prothrombotic factor in cardiovascular disease?

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been determined to be a causal risk factor for coronary heart disease, and may similarly play a role in other atherothrombotic disorders. Lp(a) consists of a lipoprotein moiety indistinguishable from LDL, as well as the plasminogen-related glycoprotein, apo(a). Therefore, the pathogenic role for Lp(a) has traditionally been considered to reflect a dual function of its similarity to LDL, causing atherosclerosis, and its similarity to plasminogen, causing thrombosis through inhibition of fibrinolysis. This postulate remains highly speculative, however, because it has been difficult to separate the prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic functions of Lp(a) from its proatherosclerotic functions. This review surveys the current landscape surrounding these issues: the biochemical basis for procoagulant and antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) is summarized and the evidence addressing the role of Lp(a) in both arterial and venous thrombosis is discussed. While elevated Lp(a) appears to be primarily predisposing to thrombotic events in the arterial tree, the fact that most of these are precipitated by underlying atherosclerosis continues to confound our understanding of the true pathogenic roles of Lp(a) and, therefore, the most appropriate therapeutic target through which to mitigate the harmful effects of this lipoprotein.

Lipoprotein (a): structure, pathophysiology and clinical implications

The chemical structure of lipoprotein (a) is similar to that of LDL, from which it differs due to the presence of apolipoprotein (a) bound to apo B100 via one disulfide bridge. Lipoprotein (a) is synthesized in the liver and its plasma concentration, which can be determined by use of monoclonal antibody-based methods, ranges from < 1 mg to > 1,000 mg/dL. Lipoprotein (a) levels over 20-30 mg/dL are associated with a two-fold risk of developing coronary artery disease. Usually, black subjects have higher lipoprotein (a) levels that, differently from Caucasians and Orientals, are not related to coronary artery disease. However, the risk of black subjects must be considered. Sex and age have little influence on lipoprotein (a) levels. Lipoprotein (a) homology with plasminogen might lead to interference with the fibrinolytic cascade, accounting for an atherogenic mechanism of that lipoprotein. Nevertheless, direct deposition of lipoprotein (a) on arterial wall is also a possible mechanism, lipoprotein (a) being more prone to oxidation than LDL. Most prospective studies have confirmed lipoprotein (a) as a predisposing factor to atherosclerosis. Statin treatment does not lower lipoprotein (a) levels, differently from niacin and ezetimibe, which tend to reduce lipoprotein (a), although confirmation of ezetimibe effects is pending. The reduction in lipoprotein (a) concentrations has not been demonstrated to reduce the risk for coronary artery disease. Whenever higher lipoprotein (a) concentrations are found, and in the absence of more effective and well-tolerated drugs, a more strict and vigorous control of the other coronary artery disease risk factors should be sought.

Lipoprotein (a) in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Relation to LDL:HDL ratio and glycemic control

BACKGROUND

Increased lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] concentrations are predictive of coronary artery disease (CAD). Type 2 diabetes mellitus also leads to dyslipidemia, like elevated triglyceride levels and low HDL levels, which are known risk factors for CAD. This study was designed to investigate the levels of Lp (a) in type 2 diabetic patients and their association with LDL: HDL ratio and glycemic control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 60 patients of type 2 diabetes and 50 age and sex matched controls. The Lp(a) levels in the diabetic group were compared with the control group and the relationship between the Lp(a) levels and LDL: HDL ratio was evaluated. Diabetic group was further divided into three subgroups according to levels of glycated hemoglobin. Lp(a) levels and glycated hemoglobin in controlled and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus were also compared to find out any correlation between them. Statistical analysis was done using the students 't' test and Chi square test.

RESULTS

Lp(a) levels were found to be significantly increased in the diabetic group as compared to the control group (P< 0.001). LDL: HDL ratio was also increased in the diabetic group as compared to the control group. Lp(a) levels showed no association with LDL: HDL ratio and degree of glycemic control in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that Lp(a) levels are increased in type 2 diabetic patients. The elevated Lp(a) levels do not reflect the glycemic status and are also independent of increase in LDL:HDL ratio suggesting different metabolic pathways and the genetic connection for LDL and Lp(a).

Apolipoprotein(a) inhibits the conversion of Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen: a novel mechanism for lipoprotein(a)-mediated inhibition of plasminogen activation

BACKGROUND

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with an increased risk for thrombotic disorders. Lp(a) is a unique lipoprotein consisting of a low-density lipoprotein-like moiety covalently linked to apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], a homologue of the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that Lp(a)/apo(a) can inhibit tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated plasminogen activation on fibrin surfaces, although the mechanism of inhibition by apo(a) remains controversial. Essential to fibrin clot lysis are a number of plasmin-dependent positive feedback reactions that enhance the efficiency of plasminogen activation, including the plasmin-mediated conversion of Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen.

OBJECTIVE

Using acid-urea gel electrophoresis to resolve the two forms of radiolabeled plasminogen, we determined whether apo(a) is able to inhibit Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen conversion.

METHODS

The assays were performed in the absence or presence of different recombinant apo(a) species, including point mutants, deletion mutants and variants that represent greater than 90% of the known apo(a) isoform sizes.

RESULTS

Apo(a) substantially suppressed Glu-plasminogen conversion. Critical roles were identified for the kringle IV types 5-9 and kringle V; contributory roles for sequences within the amino-terminal half of the molecule were also observed. Additionally, with the exception of the smallest naturally-occurring isoform of apo(a), isoform size was found not to contribute to the inhibitory capacity of apo(a).

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore a novel contribution to the understanding of Lp(a)/apo(a)-mediated inhibition of plasminogen activation: the ability of the apo(a) component of Lp(a) to inhibit the key positive feedback step of plasmin-mediated Glu-plasminogen to Lys-plasminogen conversion.

Elevated Lp(a) with a small apo(a) isoform in children: risk factor for the development of premature coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

levels of Lp(a) and low-molecular-weight apolipoprotein(a) isoform are strongly associated with the development of early cardiovascular disease. Certain types of apo(a) isoforms in combination with elevated levels of Lp(a) may be important in the determining of premature coronary artery disease. Therefore, we investigated the association of familial history of premature coronary artery disease and apo(a) size and Lp(a) levels in children and adolescents with hypercholesterolemia using a novel method determining apo(a) isoforms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Isoforms were classified in six phenotype patterns: S1-S4, B, F and according to their K-IV repeats. Apo(a) isoforms were divided into two groups: low-molecular- and high-molecular apo(a) isoforms. In subjects with double-banded apo(a) isoforms containing a small- and a large-isoform Lp(a) each contribution was based on the intensity of staining of the two bands. The percentage of patients with elevated levels of Lp(a) and a small apo(a) isoform (i.e. elevated small-isoform Lp(a)) was 46% in the risk group and 20% in the control group, p < 0.05. The percentage number of children and adolescents with elevated Lp(a) levels was higher in the risk group, reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Elevated levels of small-isoform Lp(a) might be a strong and independent risk factor for the development of premature coronary artery disease in children and adolescents with hypercholesterolemia.

Lipoprotein(a) and Thrombocytes: Potential Mechanisms Underlying Cardiovascular Risk

Plasma levels of lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Lp(a) has many properties in common with low-density lipoprotein (LDL), including a cholesteryl ester-rich lipid core and the presence of one copy of apolipoprotein B-100; both apoB-100 and the lipid core are pro-atherogenic. In addition, Lp(a) contains a unique hydrophilic, carbohydrate-rich protein, apo(a), linked to apoB through a single disulfide bond connecting the C-terminal regions of the two proteins. The similarities between apolipoprotein(a), apo(a), and plasminogen has initiated numerous studies on the possible role of Lp(a) as a prothrombotic agent. Studies to date suggest that Lp(a) has antifibrinolytic and procoagulant properties. In this review, we summarize recent studies focused on the interaction between Lp(a) and platelets. Collectively, results to date illustrate that thrombogenicity associated with Lp(a) could be due to risk associated with the LDL moiety, with the apo(a) moiety, or from the combination of those in Lp(a). Present findings suggest that the various components of Lp(a) may impact to a varying degree on different underlying pathways involved in platelet activation and aggregation. On balance, results indicate an effect by Lp(a) on platelet function and future studies focused on specific Lp(a) components, such as the role of apo(a) and of the LDL-like lipid moiety, are needed.

Fibrinogen and fibrin

Fibrinogen is a large, complex, fibrous glycoprotein with three pairs of polypeptide chains linked together by 29 disulfide bonds. It is 45 nm in length, with globular domains at each end and in the middle connected by alpha-helical coiled-coil rods. Both strongly and weakly bound calcium ions are important for maintenance of fibrinogen's structure and functions. The fibrinopeptides, which are in the central region, are cleaved by thrombin to convert soluble fibrinogen to insoluble fibrin polymer, via intermolecular interactions of the "knobs" exposed by fibrinopeptide removal with "holes" always exposed at the ends of the molecules. Fibrin monomers polymerize via these specific and tightly controlled binding interactions to make half-staggered oligomers that lengthen into protofibrils. The protofibrils aggregate laterally to make fibers, which then branch to yield a three-dimensional network-the fibrin clot-essential for hemostasis. X-ray crystallographic structures of portions of fibrinogen have provided some details on how these interactions occur. Finally, the transglutaminase, Factor XIIIa, covalently binds specific glutamine residues in one fibrin molecule to lysine residues in another via isopeptide bonds, stabilizing the clot against mechanical, chemical, and proteolytic insults. The gene regulation of fibrinogen synthesis and its assembly into multichain complexes proceed via a series of well-defined steps. Alternate splicing of two of the chains yields common variant molecular isoforms. The mechanical properties of clots, which can be quite variable, are essential to fibrin's functions in hemostasis and wound healing. The fibrinolytic system, with the zymogen plasminogen binding to fibrin together with tissue-type plasminogen activator to promote activation to the active enzyme plasmin, results in digestion of fibrin at specific lysine residues. Fibrin(ogen) also specifically binds a variety of other proteins, including fibronectin, albumin, thrombospondin, von Willebrand factor, fibulin, fibroblast growth factor-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and interleukin-1. Studies of naturally occurring dysfibrinogenemias and variant molecules have increased our understanding of fibrinogen's functions. Fibrinogen binds to activated alphaIIbbeta3 integrin on the platelet surface, forming bridges responsible for platelet aggregation in hemostasis, and also has important adhesive and inflammatory functions through specific interactions with other cells. Fibrinogen-like domains originated early in evolution, and it is likely that their specific and tightly controlled intermolecular interactions are involved in other aspects of cellular function and developmental biology.

Evaluation of lipoprotein(a) as a prothrombotic factor: progress from bench to bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the homology between apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) and plasminogen was discovered in 1987, the role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as an inhibitor of the normal fibrinolytic role of plasmin(ogen) has been a major research focus. In this review we summarize recent basic research aimed at identifying mechanisms by which Lp(a) can either inhibit fibrinolysis or promote coagulation, as well as recent clinical studies of Lp(a) as a risk factor for thrombosis either in the presence or absence of atherosclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has recently been reported that the inhibition of plasminogen activation by apo(a) results from the interaction of apo(a) with the ternary complex of tissue-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen and fibrin, rather than competition of apo(a) and plasminogen for binding sites on fibrin. Lp(a) species containing smaller apo(a) isoforms bind more avidly to fibrin and are better inhibitors of plasminogen activation. Recent clinical studies have provided strong evidence that Lp(a), either alone or in synergy with other thrombotic risk factors, significantly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism and ischemic stroke.

SUMMARY

Lp(a) both attenuates fibrinolysis, through inhibition of plasminogen activation, and promotes coagulation, through alleviation of extrinsic pathway inhibition. Further basic and clinical studies are required to more clearly define the role of Lp(a) in thrombotic disorders, and to determine the extent to which thrombotic risk is dependent on apo(a) isoform size.

Inhibition of plasminogen activation by lipoprotein(a): critical domains in apolipoprotein(a) and mechanism of inhibition on fibrin and degraded fibrin surfaces

Similarity between the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) moiety of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and plasminogen suggests a potentially important link between atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Lp(a) may interfere with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-mediated plasminogen activation in fibrinolysis, thereby generating a hypercoagulable state in vivo. A fluorescence-based system was employed to study the effect of apo(a) on plasminogen activation in the presence of native fibrin and degraded fibrin cofactors and in the absence of positive feedback reactions catalyzed by plasmin. Human Lp(a) and a physiologically relevant, 17-kringle recombinant apo(a) species exhibited strong inhibition with both cofactors. A variant lacking the protease domain also exhibited strong inhibition, indicating that the apo(a)-plasminogen binding interaction mediated by the apo(a) protease domain does not ultimately inhibit plasminogen activation. A variant in which the strong lysine-binding site in kringle IV type 10 had been abolished exhibited substantially reduced inhibition whereas another lacking the kringle V domain showed no inhibition. Amino-terminal truncation mutants of apo(a) also revealed that additional sequences within kringle IV types 1-4 are required for maximal inhibition. To investigate the inhibition mechanism, the concentrations of plasminogen, cofactor, and a 12-kringle recombinant apo(a) species were systematically varied. Kinetics for both cofactors conformed to a single, equilibrium template model in which apo(a) can interact with all three fibrinolytic components and predicts the formation of ternary (cofactor, tPA, and plasminogen) and quaternary (cofactor, tPA, plasminogen, and apo(a)) catalytic complexes. The latter complex exhibits a reduced turnover number, thereby accounting for inhibition of plasminogen activation in the presence of apo(a)/Lp(a).

Mapping of a minimal apolipoprotein(a) interaction motif conserved in fibrin(ogen) beta - and gamma -chains

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a major independent risk factor for atherothrombotic disease in humans. The physiological function(s) of Lp(a) as well as the precise mechanism(s) by which high plasma levels of Lp(a) increase risk are unknown. Binding of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) to fibrin(ogen) and other components of the blood clotting cascade has been demonstrated in vitro, but the domains in fibrin(ogen) critical for interaction are undefined. We used apo(a) kringle IV subtypes to screen a human liver cDNA library by the yeast GAL4 two-hybrid interaction trap system. Among positive clones that emerged from the screen, clones were identified as fibrinogen beta- and gamma-chains. Peptide-based pull-down experiments confirmed that the emerging peptide motif, conserved in the carboxyl-terminal globular domains of the fibrinogen beta and gamma modules specifically interacts with apo(a)/Lp(a) in human plasma as well as in cell culture supernatants of HepG2 and Chinese hamster ovary cells, ectopically expressing apo(a)/Lp(a). The influence of lysine in the fibrinogen peptides and of lysine binding sites in apo(a) for the interaction was evaluated by binding experiments with apo(a) mutants and a mutated fibrin(ogen) peptid. This confirmed the lysine binding sites in kringle IV type 10 of apo(a) as the major fibrin(ogen) binding site but also demonstrated lysine-independent interactions.

Role of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype in atherogenesis: prospective results from the Bruneck study

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies have suggested both atherogenic and thrombogenic properties of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], depending on Lp(a) plasma concentrations and varying antifibrinolytic capacity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. Epidemiological studies may contribute to assessment of the relevance of these findings in the general population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study prospectively investigated the association between Lp(a) plasma concentrations, apo(a) phenotypes, and the 5-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis assessed by high-resolution duplex ultrasound in a random sample population of 826 individuals. We differentiated early atherogenesis (incident nonstenotic atherosclerosis) from advanced (stenotic) stages in atherosclerosis that originate mainly from atherothrombotic mechanisms. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent fashion, with this association being confined to subjects with LDL cholesterol levels above the population median (3.3 mmol/L). Apo(a) phenotypes were distributed similarly in subjects with and without early carotid atherosclerosis. In contrast, apo(a) phenotypes of low molecular weight emerged as one of the strongest risk predictors of advanced stenotic atherosclerosis, especially when associated with high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.8 to 14. 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) is one of the few risk factors capable of promoting both early and advanced stages of atherogenesis. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis synergistically with high LDL cholesterol. Low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes with a putatively high antifibrinolytic capacity in turn emerged as one of the leading risk conditions of advanced stenotic stages of atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein(a): intrigues and insights

Lipoprotein(a) is an atherogenic, cholesterol ester-rich lipoprotein of unknown physiological function. The unusual species distribution of lipoprotein(a) and the extreme polymorphic nature of its distinguishing apolipoprotein component, apolipoprotein(a), have provided unique challenges for the investigation of its biochemistry, genetics, metabolism and atherogenicity. Some fundamental questions regarding this enigmatic lipoprotein have escaped elucidation, as will be highlighted in this review.

Fibrinogen deficiency reduces vascular accumulation of apolipoprotein(a) and development of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein(a) transgenic mice

To test directly whether fibrin(ogen) is a key binding site for apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] in vessel walls, apo(a) transgenic mice and fibrinogen knockout mice were crossed to generate fibrin(ogen)-deficient apo(a) transgenic mice and control mice. In the vessel wall of apo(a) transgenic mice, fibrin(ogen) deposition was found to be essentially colocalized with focal apo(a) deposition and fatty-streak type atherosclerotic lesions. Fibrinogen deficiency in apo(a) transgenic mice decreased the average accumulation of apo(a) in vessel walls by 78% and the average lesion (fatty streak type) development by 81%. Fibrinogen deficiency in wild-type mice did not significantly reduce lesion development. Our results suggest that fibrin(ogen) provides one of the major sites to which apo(a) binds to the vessel wall and participates in the generation of atherosclerosis.

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors increase fibrinolytic activity in rat aortic endothelial cells. Role of geranylgeranylation and Rho proteins

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (HRIs) have been recently shown to prevent atherosclerosis progression. Clinical benefit results from combined actions on various components of the atherosclerotic lesion. This study was designed to identify the effects of HRI on one of these components, the endothelial fibrinolytic system. Aortas isolated from rats treated for 2 days with lovastatin (4 mg/kg body wt per day) showed a 3-fold increase in tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity. In a rat aortic endothelial cell line (SVARECs) and in human nontransformed endothelial cells (HUVECs), HRI induced an increase in tPA activity and antigen in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. In SVARECs, the maximal response was observed when cells were incubated for 48 hours with 50 micromol/L HRI. An increase of tPA mRNA was also in evidence. In contrast, HRI inhibited plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity and mRNA. The effects of HRI were reversed by mevalonate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, but not by LDL cholesterol and farnesyl pyrophosphate, and were not induced by alpha-hydroxyfarnesyl phosphonic acid, an inhibitor of protein farnesyl transferase. C3 exoenzyme, an inhibitor of the geranylgeranylated-activated Rho protein, reproduced the effect of lovastatin on tPA and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity and blocked its reversal by geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate. The effect of HRI was associated with a disruption of cellular actin filaments without modification of microtubules. A disrupter of actin filaments, cytochalasin D, induced the same effect as lovastatin on tPA, whereas a disrupter of microtubules, nocodazole, did not. In conclusion, HRI can modify the fibrinolytic potential of endothelial cells, likely via inhibition of geranylgeranylated Rho protein and disruption of the actin filaments. The resulting increase of fibrinolytic activity of endothelial cells may contribute to the beneficial effects of HRI in the progression of atherosclerosis.

Enzymatic and chemical modifications of lipoprotein(a) selectively alter its lysine-binding functions

The pathogenicity of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease may depend upon its lysine binding sites (LBS) which impart unique functions to Lp(a) not shared with low density lipoprotein. Biologically relevant modifications of Lp(a) were tested for alterations of LBS activity using two previously described functional assays, a LBS-Lp(a) immunoassay and a lysine-Sepharose bead assay. In the LBS-Lp(a) immunoassay, minimal changes in the LBS activity of Lp(a) were observed after modification with lipoprotein lipase, sphingomyelinase, or phospholipase C. In contrast, a significant (p<0.003) increase in the LBS activity of Lp(a) occurred after phospholipase A2 (PLA2) treatment, and this increase was confirmed using the lysine-Sepharose bead assay. The increase depended upon the release of fatty acids from Lp(a) by PLA2. A decrease in the LBS activity of Lp(a) occurred after oxidation of Lp(a) with 2,2'-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) (44% decrease), but CuSO4 oxidation increased LBS activity (210%). N-acetylcysteine (NAC) treatment of Lp(a) decreased (48%) LBS activity while homocysteine treatment had no (89%) effect. Thus, modification of phospholipids and protein moieties can alter the LBS-activity of Lp(a). Such enzymatic and chemical modifications may contribute to the variability in LBS function of Lp(a) seen within the population.

Syndromes of thrombosis and hypercoagulability. Congenital and acquired causes of thrombosis

Blood coagulation protein and platelet defects are now known to account for up to ninety percent of unexplained venous thrombosis and up to seventy percent of unexplained arterial thrombotic or ischemic events. This article summarizes the common and uncommon blood protein and platelet defects which should be suspected, and searched for, in patients with such events. Defining such defects will have major impact on secondary prevention and duration of antithrombotic therapy in the afflicted patient and impact on primary prevention for identified family members in those harboring hereditary defects.

The lysine-binding function of Lp(a)

The atherogenicity of Lp(a) is attributable to the binding of its apolipoprotein(a) component to fibrin and other plasminogen substrates. It can attenuate the activation of plasminogen, diminishing plasmin-dependent fibrinolysis and transforming growth factor-beta activation. Apolipoprotein(a) contains a major lysine-binding site in one of its kringle domains. Destroying this site by site-directed mutagenesis greatly reduces the binding of apolipoprotein(a) to lysine and fibrin. Transgenic mice expressing wild-type apolipoprotein(a) have a 5-fold increase in the development of lipid lesions, as well as a large increase in the focal deposition of apolipoprotein(a) in the aorta, compared to the lysine-binding site mutant strain and to non-transgenic litter mates. Although the adaptive function of apolipoprotein(a) remains obscure, a gene with similar structure has evolved by independent remodeling of the plasminogen twice during the course of mammalian evolution.

Thrombosis, antithrombotic agents, and the antithrombotic approach in cardiac disease

To develop a rational approach to antithrombotic therapy, in cardiac disease, a sound understanding is required (1) of the hemostatic processes leading to thrombosis, (2) of the various antithrombotic agents, and (3) of the relative risks of thrombosis and thromboembolism in the various cardiac disease entities. With the understanding of pathogenesis and risk of thrombus formation, a rational approach to the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents can be formulated. Those at high risk of thrombus formation should generally receive a high degree of antithrombotics and, depending on the pathophysiology of the thrombus, may benefit from the concomitant use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. Those with a medium risk of thrombus formation may benefit with the use of an antiplatelet agent alone or anticoagulants alone. Patients at low risk of thrombus formation should not receive antithrombotics. Such rational approach to antithrombotic therapy serves as the basis of this article.

Apolipoprotein(a) attenuates endogenous fibrinolysis in the rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model in vivo

BACKGROUND

In many case-control as well as epidemiological studies, increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are considered to constitute an independent risk factor for premature coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease. Lp(a) resembles an LDL particle with an additional linked protein [apolipoprotein(a), apo(a)], whose molecular structure has been demonstrated to be homologous to the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen. Because of the high similarity between plasminogen and apo(a), apo(a) may potentially interfere in the fibrinolytic system by competing with plasminogen for fibrin binding sites. In vitro studies have demonstrated that Lp(a) indeed competes with plasminogen binding to fibrin and inhibits tissue plasminogen activator (TPA)-mediated activation of plasminogen. No direct in vivo studies to test this hypothesis have been performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of a recombinant form of apo(a) on endogenous and TPA-mediated thrombolysis in an in vivo model of experimental venous thrombosis. Thrombi containing either 16 microg r-apo(a), 8 microg r-apo(a), or vehicle (HEPES-buffered saline, control) were formed in the jugular veins of a rabbit and showed significantly reduced endogenous thrombolysis after 60 minutes in a dose-dependent fashion, ID 2.7+/-0.9% and 4.6+/-1.8%, respectively, versus 7.4+/-1.6% of that of the control. High concentrations of incorporated apo(a) significantly reduced TPA-induced thrombolysis (12.2+/-2.5% versus 22.2+/-2.6% in the control thrombi), but no effect of lower concentrations of incorporated r-apo(a) was demonstrated on the exogenous TPA-induced thrombolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates the attenuation of endogenous fibrinolysis by apo(a) in an in vivo model of experimental venous thrombosis, lending support to the proposed mechanism of impaired fibrinolysis by which Lp(a) may contribute to atherothrombotic disorders.

Novel Interaction of Apolipoprotein(a) With β-2 Glycoprotein I Mediated by the Kringle IV Domain

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], which has been shown to interact with fibrin(ogen) and other components of the blood clotting cascade, is a major independent risk factor for atherothrombotic disease in humans. The physiological function(s) of Lp(a), as well as the precise mechanism(s) by which high plasma levels of Lp(a) increase risk are unknown. Identification of further potential apo(a)-protein ligands may be crucial to illuminate apo(a)'s function(s) and pathophysiological properties. We used the repetitive apo(a) kringle IV type 2, which is variable in number in apo(a), to screen a human liver cDNA library by the yeast two-hybrid interaction trap system. Among 11 positive clones that emerged from the screen, eight clones were identified as β-2 glycoprotein I and one as fibronectin. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that β-2 glycoprotein I and apo(a)/Lp(a) interact in human plasma and in cell culture supernatants of COS-1 cells, which ectopically expressed apo(a). The apo(a)-β2-glycoprotein I interaction indicates new potential roles for Lp(a) in fibrinolysis and autoimmunity.

Novel Interaction of Apolipoprotein(a) With β-2 Glycoprotein I Mediated by the Kringle IV Domain

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], which has been shown to interact with fibrin(ogen) and other components of the blood clotting cascade, is a major independent risk factor for atherothrombotic disease in humans. The physiological function(s) of Lp(a), as well as the precise mechanism(s) by which high plasma levels of Lp(a) increase risk are unknown. Identification of further potential apo(a)-protein ligands may be crucial to illuminate apo(a)'s function(s) and pathophysiological properties. We used the repetitive apo(a) kringle IV type 2, which is variable in number in apo(a), to screen a human liver cDNA library by the yeast two-hybrid interaction trap system. Among 11 positive clones that emerged from the screen, eight clones were identified as β-2 glycoprotein I and one as fibronectin. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that β-2 glycoprotein I and apo(a)/Lp(a) interact in human plasma and in cell culture supernatants of COS-1 cells, which ectopically expressed apo(a). The apo(a)-β2-glycoprotein I interaction indicates new potential roles for Lp(a) in fibrinolysis and autoimmunity.

Modification of apolipoprotein(a) lysine binding site reduces atherosclerosis in transgenic mice

Lipoprotein(a) contributes to the development of atherosclerosis through the binding of its plasminogen-like apolipoprotein(a) component to fibrin and other plasminogen substrates. Apolipoprotein(a) contains a major lysine binding site in one of its kringle domains. Destruction of this site by mutagenesis greatly reduces the binding of apolipoprotein(a) to lysine and fibrin. Transgenic mice expressing this mutant form of apolipoprotein(a) as well as mice expressing wild-type apolipoprotein(a) have been created in an inbred mouse strain. The wild-type apolipoprotein(a) transgenic mice have a fivefold increase in the development of lipid lesions, as well as a large increase in the focal deposition of apolipoprotein(a) in the aorta, compared with the lysine binding site mutant strain and to nontransgenic littermates. The results demonstrate the key role of this lysine binding site in the pathogenic activity of apolipoprotein(a) in a murine model system.

Pathophysiological implication of the structural domains of lipoprotein(a)

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for the premature development of cardiovascular disease. In spite of such evidence, the structural and functional features of this atherogenic, cholesterol-rich particle are not clearly understood. We have demonstrated the presence of two distinct structural domains in apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), which are linked by a flexible and accessible region located between kringles 4-4 and 4-5. We have isolated the Lp(a) particle following removal of the N-terminal domain by proteolytic cleavage; the residual particle, containing the C-terminal domain (comprising the region from Kr 4-5 to the protease domain), is linked to apo B-100 by disulphide linkage, and is termed 'mini-Lp(a)'. Mini-Lp(a) exhibited the same binding affinity to fibrin as the corresponding Lp(a). This finding indicated that the kringles responsible for fibrin binding are restricted to Kr 4-5 to Kr 4-10, an observation consistent with the failure of the N-terminal domain to bind to fibrin. N-terminal fragments of apo(a) have been detected in the urine of normal subjects, thereby indicating that part of the catabolism of Lp(a), which is largely indeterminate, could occur via the renal route.

Oxidative modification enhances lipoprotein(a)-induced overproduction of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in cultured vascular endothelial cells

Elevated levels of plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been considered as a strong risk factor for premature cardiovascular diseases. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is the major physiological inhibitor of plasminogen activators (PA). Increases in PAI-1 levels with or without a reduction in PA levels have been frequently found in coronary artery disease patients. The present paper examined the effects of oxidized Lp(a) on the production of PAI-1 in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). Lp(a) and Lp(a)-free, low density lipoprotein (LDL) were prepared using lysine-Sepharose 4B affinity chromatography. Incubations with 10(-8) M levels of native Lp(a) moderately increased the levels of biologically active PAI-1 in post-culture medium of HUVEC compared to that with equimolar concentrations of native Lp(a)-free LDL. The release of PAI-1 induced by Lp(a) was enhanced by oxidative modification with copper ion. The stimulation of oxidized Lp(a) on PAI-1 production reached plateau in EC treated with 10-20 nM oxidized Lp(a) modified by microM CuSO4. Treatment with 0.2 micrograms/ml of actinomycin D significantly reduced native and oxidized Lp(a)-induced PAI-1 overproduction in EC. Increases in the steady state levels of PAI-1 mRNA were detected in native or oxidized Lp(a)-treated EC. The effect of Lp(a)-free oxidized LDL on PAI-1 production was significantly weaker than the equimolar amount of oxidized Lp(a) but stronger than that of native LDL. Treatments with oxidized Lp(a) increased cell-associated PAI-1 to a similar extent as that in native Lp(a)-treated EC. The results of the present paper demonstrate that oxidative modification enhances Lp(a)-induced PAI-1 production in vascular endothelial cells at RNA transcription level, which suggests that oxidization potentially amplifies the anti-fibrinolytic and thrombotic effect of Lp(a).

Factors affecting fibrinolytic potential: cardiovascular fitness, body composition, and lipoprotein(a)

The purpose of the study was to determine the factors that affect basal (resting) and poststressor fibrinolytic activity or potential. Variables of interest included cardiovascular fitness (maximal oxygen consumption [Vo2max]), body fat, body mass index (BMI), and lipids/lipoproteins, including lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Blood was collected from 46 middle-aged men before and after a maximal exercise test. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine associations between the variables of interest and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activities in the basal state and after stimulation with maximal exercise. Multiple regression analyses were also conducted to determine independent predictors of the fibrinolytic variables. Maximal exercise produced significant increases in t-PA activity and decreases in PAI-1 activity. Postexercise t-PA activity was inversely related to basal PAI-1 activity (r = -.34). Vo2max was positively correlated with t-PA activity (basal, r = .39; postexercise, r = .67) and inversely related to PAI-1 activity (basal, r = -.41; postexercise, r = -.42). Body fat was correlated with postexercise t-PA activity (r = -.60) and both basal and postexercise PAI-1 activity (r = .42), but the correlation with basal t-PA activity was not significant (P = .058). Postexercise t-PA activity was positively correlated (r = .37) with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and negatively correlated (r = -.42) with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Basal PAI-1 activity was negatively correlated with HDL-C (r = -.37), Lp(a) was not correlated with any fibrinolytic variable or fitness. Multiple regression analyses showed that Vo2max was an independent predictor of both basal and postexercise t-PA activity (R2 = .16 and .34, respectively). Triglyceride (TG) levels and Vo2max were significant independent predictors of PAI-1 activity (R2 = .31). In conclusion, cardiovascular fitness was a strong independent predictor of fibrinolytic potential. In addition, poststressor measures of fibrinolytic potential may provide more information about the fibrinolytic system than basal values.

Lipoprotein(a) stimulates the proliferation of cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells through two pathways

We investigated the effect of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) on proliferation of human arterial smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and its mechanisms of action. Low density lipoprotein (LDL), Lp(a) and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) significantly stimulated the proliferation of SMCs. Lp(a) and apo(a) reduced the amount of active transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) with the mink lung epithelial cell bioassay, however LDL had no effect. Lp(a), but not apo(a), significantly stimulated the proliferation of SMCs even in the presence of a neutralizing antibody for TGF-beta. Our results suggest that Lp(a) stimulates the proliferation of SMCs via apo(a)-induced inhibition of TGF-beta activation and stimulation of SMCs by the LDL-particle of Lp(a).

Endothelium, fibrinolysis, cardiac risk factors, and prostaglandins: a unified model of atherogenesis

A model of atherogenesis is described in which it is proposed that a state of relative impairment of intravascular fibrinolytic function is the primary defect which makes possible both the initiation and the continued progression of arterial plaques. The key mechanism by which impaired fibrinolysis is atherogenic centers on the unique disruptive effect which fibrin has on the contiguous endothelium of the vascular intimal surface. From this perspective, in areas of spontaneous endothelial injury, impaired fibrinolysis maintains and promotes the gradual enlargement of the area of injury by causing persistently increased intimal permeability and by allowing enhanced fibrin and platelet deposition. This hypothesis thus represents a modification of the response-to-injury hypothesis in which the emphasis has been shifted from the initial endothelial injury to a state of interference with the normal process of healing endothelial injuries. Consistent with this viewpoint, it is noted that all positive risk factors for vascular disease are associated with impairment of fibrinolytic function and, conversely, negative cardiac risk factors enhance fibrinolysis. It is further proposed that one or more prostaglandins, or closely related metabolites, represent the mediators of primary physiologic importance with regard to in vivo regulation of fibrinolysis. By this hypothesis, adequate dietary intake of essential fatty acids, as well as maintenance of unimpaired eicosanoid metabolism, become centrally important in both preventing and reversing arteriosclerosis. This two-tiered model can be used to organize and potentially explain the interrelationship between diverse and apparently divergent sets of epidemiological data which previous models have been unable to accommodate.

Mechanisms of physiological fibrinolysis

The fibrinolytic system comprises an inactive proenzyme, plasminogen, that is converted by plasminogen activators to the active enzyme, plasmin, which degrades fibrin. Two immunologically distinct plasminogen activators (PA) have been identified: tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA). t-PA mediated plasminogen activation is mainly involved in the dissolution of fibrin in the circulation, whereas u-PA mediated plasminogen activation mainly plays a role in pericellular proteolysis. Plasminogen activation is regulated by specific molecular interactions between its main components, such as binding of plasminogen and t-PA to fibrin, or to specific cellular receptors resulting in enhanced plasminogen activation, inhibition of t-PA and u-PA by plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI) and inhibition of plasmin by alpha 2-antiplasmin. Controlled synthesis and release of PAs and PAIs primarily from endothelial cells also contributes to the regulation of physiological fibrinolysis. The lysine binding sites situated in the kringle structures of plasminogen play a crucial role in the regulation of fibrinolysis by modulating its binding to fibrin and to cell surfaces, and by controlling the inhibition rate of plasmin by alpha 2-antiplasmin.

Antifibrinolytic effect of recombinant apolipoprotein(a) in vitro is primarily due to attenuation of tPA-mediated Glu-plasminogen activation

The effect of a 17-kringle form of recombinant apo(a) [r-apo(a)] on in vitro fibrin clot lysis was studied. In these assays, fibrin clots were formed in the wells of microtiter plates, and lysis of the clots was monitored by measurement of the turbidity at 405 nm. The results indicate that r-apo(a) produces a dose-dependent antifibrinolytic effect in clots formed using either purified components or barium-adsorbed plasma. This effect was found to be independent of clot structure, since lysis of clots formed using both high and low concentrations of thrombin was prolonged by r-apo(a) to the same extent. The two components of the antifibrinolytic effect of r-apo(a) were determined to be (i) attenuation of tPA-mediated plasminogen activation (the major component) and (ii) inhibition of plasmin degradation of fibrin, although r-apo(a) did not directly attenuate plasmin activity, as measured by S-2251 hydrolysis. r-Apo(a) interfered most substantially with tPA-mediated activation of Glu-plasminogen and less substantially with tPA-mediated Lys-plasminogen activation and urokinase-mediated activation of plasminogen. In summary, we have demonstrated that apo(a) is able to attenuate fibrin clot lysis in vitro, primarily as a consequence of the interference by apo(a) with tPA-mediated Glu-plasminogen activation. These studies illuminate possible mechanisms by which Lp(a) may contribute to the development of vascular disease in vivo.

Antifibrinolytic activity of apolipoprotein(a) in vivo: human apolipoprotein(a) transgenic mice are resistant to tissue plasminogen activator-mediated thrombolysis

The extensive homology between apolipoprotein(a) and plasminogen has led to the hypothesis that the increased risk for atherosclerosis, cardiac disease and stroke associated with elevated levels of apolipoprotein(a) may reflect modulation of fibrinolysis. We have investigated the role of apolipoprotein(a) on clot lysis in transgenic mice expressing the human apolipoprotein(a) gene. These mice develop fatty streak lesions resembling early lesions of human atherosclerosis. Pulmonary emboli were generated in mice by injection, through the right jugular vein, of a human platelet-rich plasma clot radiolabelled with technetium-99m-labelled antifibrin antibodies. Tissue plasminogen activator was introduced continuously via the right jugular vein. Clot lysis, determined by ex vivo imaging, was depressed in mice carrying the apolipoprotein(a) transgene relative to their sex-matched normal littermates. These results directly demonstrate an in vivo effect of apolipoprotein(a) on fibrinolysis, an effect that may contribute to the pathology associated with elevated levels of this protein.

Lipoprotein (a) in the regulation of fibrinolysis

Elevated plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [LP(a)] are associated with increased an risk of developing atherosclerosis. This increased risk may be due to an Lp(a)-mediated depression of fibrinolytic activity. Lp(a) regulates fibrinolysis by controlling the activity of plasminogen activators. Lp(a) is a low density lipoprotein with an apoprotein(a) subunit which has a high degree of homology with the fibrinolytic zymogen plasminogen. The apoprotein(a) subunit contains up to thirty seven copies of a domain homologous to the plasminogen kringle 4 domain, which enables Lp(a) to bind to fibrin. The subunit also has a zymogen domain, but it is not activated by plasminogen activators. Lp(a) inhibits plasminogen activation by competing with plasminogen for access to plasminogen activators bound to vascular surfaces. Lp(a) also competes with the irreversible inhibitor of plasminogen activators, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Therefore increases in Lp(a) concentration may decrease fibrinolytic activity by preventing activation of plasminogen, but Lp(a) may also prolong plasminogen activation by preventing the irreversible inhibition of the activators. At elevated levels of Lp(a) the decreased rate of plasmin generation may not be offset by the prolongation in plasminogen activation, and fibrinolysis will be inhibited.

Hypercoagulability and thrombosis

This article has stressed the common hereditary and acquired blood protein defects associated with thrombosis. The commonest hereditary defects appear to be antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiency, and the commonest acquired defects are anticardiolipin antibodies and the lupus anticoagulant. Therefore these are the defects that should first be looked for in an individual with unexplained thrombosis. If these commoner defects are not found, the rarer defects, including HC-II, plasminogen or t-PA deficiency, dysfibrinogenemia, or elevated PAI-1, should next be sought. The incidence of activated protein C cofactor deficiency is not yet clear but may also represent a common defect. Likewise, PAI-1 defects may, with time, be shown to be quite common. The importance of finding these defects has significant implications for therapy of the individual patient and for institution of family studies to identify, inform, and possibly treat others at risk. It is expected that as knowledge of hemostasis expands, more hereditary and acquired defects, such as elevated lipoprotein (a) or defects of extrinsic (tissue factor) pathway inhibitor may be associated with enhanced risks of thrombosis.

Lipoprotein(A): physiologic function, association with atherosclerosis, and effects of lipid-lowering drug therapy

OBJECTIVE

To review the structure and physiologic function of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], review the association of Lp(a) with the development of atherosclerosis, and to critically evaluate the current literature regarding the effects of lipid-lowering drug therapy on Lp(a) serum concentrations.

DATA SOURCES

English language clinical and animal studies, abstracts, and review articles pertaining to Lp(a).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant human and animal studies examining Lp(a)'s role in atherosclerosis and the effect of drug therapy on Lp(a) serum concentrations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Possible physiologic functions and potential atherogenic mechanisms of Lp(a) are discussed. Evidence supporting the association of Lp(a) with atherosclerosis is presented. Studies evaluating the effects of lipid-lowering drug therapy on Lp(a) concentrations are reviewed and critiqued.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) concentrations are correlated with the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD) in both animals models and human studies. Drug therapies that have produced a consistent reduction in Lp(a) concentration include niacin alone or in combination with a bile acid sequestrant or neomycin. However, additional, larger studies are needed to evaluate the ability of drug therapies to specifically reduce elevated Lp(a) concentrations. Preliminary information suggests that reduction in Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with atherosclerotic plaque regression. Although drugs are available to lower Lp(a), one cannot conclude that lowering of Lp(a) is warranted until clinical trials demonstrating beneficial effects have been published.

Lipoproteins inhibit the secretion of tissue plasminogen activator from human endothelial cells

We studied the effect of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) on tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) secretion from human endothelial cells. At 1 mumol/L, Lp(a) inhibited constitutive TPA secretion by 50% and phorbol myristate acetate- and histamine-enhanced TPA secretion by 40%. LDL and HDL also depressed TPA secretion by 45% and 35% (constitutive) and 40% to 60% (stimulated). TPA mRNA levels were also examined and found to change in parallel with antigen secretion. In contrast to TPA, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 secretion and mRNA levels were not affected by any of the three lipoproteins. These results suggest that the interaction of lipoproteins with certain cell-surface binding sites may interfere with the proper production and/or secretion of TPA.

Identification of glycoprotein IIb as the lipoprotein(a)-binding protein on platelets. Lipoprotein(a) binding is independent of an arginyl-glycyl-aspartate tripeptide located in apolipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plays an important role in atherosclerosis. The amino acid sequence of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] reveals an arginyl-glycyl-aspartate (RGD) tripeptide that is the consensus sequence for binding of adhesive plasma proteins of the fibrinolytic system, such as fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor, to the platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (GPIIb-IIIa) complex. Therefore, we undertook the present study to further investigate the role of Lp(a) in hemostasis. Binding of 125I-Lp(a) to a single platelet membrane-associated protein (137 +/- 6 kD) comigrating with platelet GPIIb (140 kD) was found to be specific, saturable, and Ca2+ independent. Binding of 125I-Lp(a) to resting human blood platelets was saturable, insensitive to temperature, and independent of the apo(a) isoform (B, S1 through S3). Scatchard analysis revealed a Kd of 7.2 +/- 1.8 x 10(-9) mol/L, with 729 +/- 313 Lp(a) molecules bound per platelet. Monoclonal anti-GPIIb IgG diminished Lp(a) binding by approximately 80%, monoclonal anti-GPIIb-IIIa IgG by 60%, and anti-GPIIIa IgG by just 15%. 125I-Lp(a) binding was competitively inhibited to the same extent by either unlabeled Lp(a) or fibrinogen. Low- and high-density lipoproteins were much weaker competitors. A polyclonal antibody raised against the RGDGQSYRGT sequence of apo(a) was used to verify the presence of an RGD sequence in the different Lp(a) preparations investigated. However, two lines of evidence indicated that the RGD sequence is not the binding domain mediating Lp(a) binding to platelets. First, incubation of platelets with isolated RGD tripeptide did not influence Lp(a) binding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The apolipoprotein(a) gene: characterization of 5' flanking regions and expression in transgenic mice

The human genome contains at least six homologues of the apolipoprotein(a) and plasminogen genes, which contain over 90% identity in the region corresponding to 5' flanking sequences and exon one. This region of the apolipoprotein(a) gene contains transcription control elements, and sequence differences in this region account for some of the variation in plasma Lp(a) concentration. Transgenic mice expressing human apolipoprotein(a) develop aortic lesions resembling the early stages of human atherosclerosis after 3.5 months on a high fat diet. The transgenic mouse model should prove a useful system for studying the role of apolipoprotein(a) in disease.

Lipoprotein (a) regulates plasmin generation and inhibition

The relationship between lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and atherosclerosis has been appreciated for a number of years. Only in recent years, however, has the structural relationship of Lp(a) to plasminogen resulted in studies of the effect of this lipoprotein on fibrinolysis. Lp(a) inhibits activation of plasminogen by tissue-type (t-PA) and urinary-type (u-PA) plasminogen activators. These inhibitory reactions are surface-dependent. When Lp(a) binds to fibrin, fibrinogen, heparin or cells it blocks activation of plasminogen by t-PA. u-PA-mediated activation of plasminogen is blocked on surfaces including heparin and chondroitin sulfate. Lp(a) also favors inhibition of plasmin by alpha 2-antiplasmin (alpha 2-AP). The ability of Lp(a) to compete with plasmin for fibrin binding displaces plasmin into solution where alpha 2-AP rapidly inhibits this proteinase. These effects are all antifibrinolytic. Lp(a) also exhibits one profibrinolytic effect, since it blocks inhibition of t-PA by plasminogen activator type 1 in the presence of fibrinogen or heparin. Thus, Lp(a) modulates most of the reactions involved in plasmin generation and inhibition. Its overall effect will depend primarily on the concentrations of Lp(a), PAI-1 and t-PA in vivo.