Lack of generalization of nisoxetine with amphetamine in the rat

The effects in rats of lisdexamfetamine in combination with olanzapine on mesocorticolimbic dopamine efflux, striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and stimulus generalization to a D-amphetamine cue

The etiology of schizophrenia is poorly understood and two principle hypotheses have dominated the field. Firstly, that subcortical dopamine function is enhanced while cortical dopamine function is reduced and secondly, that cortical glutamate systems are dysfunctional. It is also widely accepted that currently used antipsychotics have essentially no impact on cognitive deficits and persistent negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Reduced dopamine transmission via dopamine D1 receptors in the prefrontal cortex has been hypothesized to be involved in the aetiology of these symptom domains and enhancing cortical dopamine transmission within an optimal window has been suggested to be potentially beneficial. In these pre-clinical studies we have determined that combined administration of the d-amphetamine pro-drug, lisdexamfetamine and the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine increased dopamine efflux in the rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens to an extent greater than either drug given separately without affecting olanzapine's ability to block striatal dopamine D2 receptors which is important for its antipsychotic activity. Furthermore, in an established rodent model used to compare the subjective effects of novel compounds the ability of lisdexamfetamine to generalize to a d-amphetamine cue was dose-dependently attenuated when co-administered with olanzapine suggesting that lisdexamfetamine may produce less marked subjective effects when administered adjunctively with olanzapine.

Discriminative stimulus effects of (-)-ephedrine in rats: analysis with catecholamine transporter and receptor ligands

A drug discrimination procedure was used to examine the neuropharmacology of (-)-ephedrine (5 mg/kg), a sympathomimetic amine found in a variety of dietary supplements. (-)-Ephedrine has caused concern because of its use as a precursor in the manufacture of street drugs (e.g. methamphetamine) and its potential for abuse and toxicity. In the present study, the catecholamine reuptake inhibitors mazindol and nomifensine, the norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor desipramine, and the dopamine D(2)-like (e.g. D(2), D(3) and D(4)) agonist quinpirole substituted for (-)-ephedrine (>/=80% (-)-ephedrine-lever responding). The NE reuptake inhibitor nisoxetine, the D(1)-like (e.g. D(1) and D(5)) agonists (+/-)-SKF 38393 and SKF 82958, and the mixed D(1)-/D(2)-like agonist apomorphine occasioned intermediate levels of responding (50-79% (-)-ephedrine-lever responding). The (-)-ephedrine cue was antagonized by the D(1)-like antagonist SCH 23390 and the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin as well as the D(2)-like antagonists (-)-eticlopride and haloperidol, although only at doses that disrupted responding in some rats. The discriminative stimulus effects of a small dose of (-)-ephedrine (1.25 mg/kg) were enhanced by the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan and to a lesser extent by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist (-)-propranolol. However, the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine (0.04 mg/kg) did not attenuate the (-)-ephedrine stimulus. These results suggest that D(1)-, D(2)-like, and alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of (-)-ephedrine. Substitution of desipramine for (-)-ephedrine and not for some other stimulants suggests that NE transmission is a prominent feature of the (-)-ephedrine discriminative stimulus, and that NE underlies therapeutic and abuse-related effects of (-)-ephedrine that diverge from those of other stimulants.

Further evidence for the mechanisms that may mediate nicotine discrimination

Rats were trained to discriminate the interoceptive stimuli produced by subcutaneously administered 0.4 mg/kg nicotine in a two-lever, food-motivated, operant task. Once criterion performance was attained, dose-response experiments indicated an ED50 value of 0.1 mg/kg and subsequent time course experiments showed a maximal effect between 10 and 30 min postadministration with a return to saline-like responding at 2 h. Pretreatment with the presynaptic dopamine release inhibitors CGS 10746B (30 mg/kg), as well as with the dihydropyridine calcium blocker isradipine (15 mg/kg), each produced a significant blockade of nicotine discrimination. In contrast, the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor 5-HT3 antagonist ICS-205930 did not produce any effect upon nicotine discrimination. Thus, drugs that interfere with calcium influx, viz., isradipine, or with dopamine release (CGS 10746B) also interfere with nicotine discrimination and these results suggest that calcium influx and dopamine release may be necessary conditions for nicotine discrimination.

Effect of serotonin depletion by p-chlorophenylalanine upon discriminative behaviours

1. Para-chlorophenylalanine (p-CPA), a competitive inhibitor of the serotonin (5-HT) synthesis enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase, was administered to rats at a dosage (100 mg/kg daily for 3 days) that depletes 5-HT. 2. Different groups of these rats were previously trained to discriminate the interoceptive stimuli produced by amphetamine, cathinone, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDE), fenfluramine or yohimbine, and the effect of p-CPA pretreatment upon their discriminative performance was compared with the effect of saline (control) pretreatment. 3. p-CPA was shown to have no effect upon the dopaminergically-mediated stimuli produced by the stimulants amphetamine and cathinone or upon yohimbine performance. 4. p-CPA significantly decreased discriminative performance with the serotonergic releasing drugs MDMA, MDE and fenfluramine. This decrease in discriminative performance returned to pre-p-CPA (criterion) levels at a time (9-12 days) when 5-HT has been reported to replete to normal brain concentrations. 5. It is concluded that p-CPA pretreatment lowers brain 5-HT and, in turn, significantly decreases the ability of rats to discriminate centrally active drugs whose interoceptive cueing stimuli are mediated by 5-HT neurons.

Increased drug sensitivity in the drug discrimination procedure afforded by drug versus drug training

Rats were trained to discriminate norfenfluramine (NF) 1.4 mg/kg from its vehicle or amphetamine (AMPH) 0.8 mg/kg or pentobarbital (PB) 6.0 mg/kg in order to determine the role that drug combination training plays in the rate of learning and sensitivity to lower drug doses. The results suggest that drug versus drug training can increase the rate of drug discrimination learning for some drugs that are learned slowly when trained in a drug versus vehicle training procedure, whereas drug versus drug training does not increase the rate of learning for other drugs that are learned rapidly. Drug versus drug training does, however, appear to increase the level of stimulus control of the training drug for all drugs examined in this study.

Stability of the stimulus properties of drugs over time

Three separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate the stimulus effects of either 600 mg/kg ethanol (n = 5), 0.8 mg/kg d-amphetamine (n = 8) or 1.0 mg/kg 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP; n = 10). Once criterion performance was attained, each group was tested with various doses of the drug used in their training, thus allowing for calculations of dose-response curves and ED50 values. A second dose-response relationship was established at a later time, averaging over a year later, and this result was compared to the initial curve. In none of the three groups was there substantial change in the sensitivity of the rats to different doses of the drug used in training as indicated by similar ED50 values. These results suggest that the drug discrimination procedure is stable over a period of continuous training and testing.

CGS 10746B is able to attenuate the effects of amphetamine: further evidence for dopaminergic mediation

Previous results indicate that agents which either decreases synthesis or block postsynaptic dopamine receptors will attenuate the discriminative stimulus produced by d-amphetamine. CGS 10746B has been reported to decrease dopamine release without changing its metabolism or occupying its receptors. In the present study, rats successfully trained to discriminate intraperitoneally administered (0.8 mg/kg) d-amphetamine in a two-lever, food-motivated operant task were observed to be unable to discriminate amphetamine when pretreated with 30 mg/kg CGS 10746B. This antagonism was shown to be dose-responsive and constitutes a third mechanism, i.e., dopamine release inhibition, that evidences the dopaminergic mediation of amphetamine in the discriminative paradigm. When both cathinone (0.8 mg/kg) and cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) were administered to the amphetamine-trained rats they each were recognized as amphetamine and are, thus, considered to generalize to the amphetamine discriminative stimulus. Coadministration of CGS 10746B and cathinone totally antagonized this generalization, whereas pretreatment with CGS 10746B prior to cocaine significantly reduced cocaine's effects. These results implicate dopamine mechanisms in the discriminative stimulus properties of the psychostimulants amphetamine, cathinone and cocaine.