Therapeutic and hypothermic properties of diazepam altered by a diazepam-chlorpromazine association

Learning in Transcriptional Network Models: Computational Discovery of Pathway-Level Memory and Effective Interventions

Trainability, in any substrate, refers to the ability to change future behavior based on past experiences. An understanding of such capacity within biological cells and tissues would enable a particularly powerful set of methods for prediction and control of their behavior through specific patterns of stimuli. This top-down mode of control (as an alternative to bottom-up modification of hardware) has been extensively exploited by computer science and the behavioral sciences; in biology however, it is usually reserved for organism-level behavior in animals with brains, such as training animals towards a desired response. Exciting work in the field of basal cognition has begun to reveal degrees and forms of unconventional memory in non-neural tissues and even in subcellular biochemical dynamics. Here, we characterize biological gene regulatory circuit models and protein pathways and find them capable of several different kinds of memory. We extend prior results on learning in binary transcriptional networks to continuous models and identify specific interventions (regimes of stimulation, as opposed to network rewiring) that abolish undesirable network behavior such as drug pharmacoresistance and drug sensitization. We also explore the stability of created memories by assessing their long-term behavior and find that most memories do not decay over long time periods. Additionally, we find that the memory properties are quite robust to noise; surprisingly, in many cases noise actually increases memory potential. We examine various network properties associated with these behaviors and find that no one network property is indicative of memory. Random networks do not show similar memory behavior as models of biological processes, indicating that generic network dynamics are not solely responsible for trainability. Rational control of dynamic pathway function using stimuli derived from computational models opens the door to empirical studies of proto-cognitive capacities in unconventional embodiments and suggests numerous possible applications in biomedicine, where behavior shaping of pathway responses stand as a potential alternative to gene therapy.

A drug-drug conditioning paradigm reveals multiple antipsychotic-nicotine interactions

Clinical studies indicate a reciprocal impact between nicotine use and antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia. The present study used a conditioned avoidance response (CAR) test (a behavioral test of antipsychotic effect) and examined the specific drug-drug interactions between nicotine and haloperidol or clozapine. Following acquisition of the avoidance response, rats were first tested under either vehicle, nicotine (0.2, 0.4 mg/kg, sc), haloperidol (0.025, 0.05 mg/kg, sc), clozapine (5.0, 10.0 mg/kg, sc), or a combination of nicotine and haloperidol or nicotine and clozapine for seven consecutive days. Afterward, they were challenged with nicotine (0.2 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.025 mg/kg), or clozapine (5.0 mg/kg) in the CAR to assess if haloperidol or clozapine affected the behavioral effect of nicotine on avoidance response and if nicotine altered the avoidance suppressive effect of haloperidol and clozapine. During the seven avoidance drug test days, nicotine did not alter the avoidance suppressive effect of haloperidol or clozapine. However, in the challenge test, prior nicotine treatment (0.2 mg/kg) attenuated haloperidol's (0.05 mg/kg) sensitized effect on avoidance response. On the other hand, prior haloperidol treatment increased nicotine's (0.2 mg/kg) avoidance disruptive effect, and even engendered nicotine 0.4 mg/kg to exhibit an "acquired" avoidance suppressive effect. The combined nicotine and clozapine treatment did not produce any detectable interactive effects on avoidance response and motor activity. These findings suggest that nicotine is capable of altering the long-term antipsychotic efficacy of haloperidol, while haloperidol can alter the behavioral effects of nicotine. Clozapine and nicotine are less likely to influence each other.

Drug-drug conditioning between citalopram and haloperidol or olanzapine in a conditioned avoidance response model: implications for polypharmacy in schizophrenia

Patients with schizophrenia often have anxiety and depression, and thus are treated with multiple psychotherapeutic medications. This practice of polypharmacy increases the possibility for drug-drug interactions. However, the pharmacological and behavioral mechanisms underlying drug-drug interactions in schizophrenia remain poorly understood. In the present study, we adopted a preclinical approach and examined a less known behavioral mechanism, drug-drug conditioning (DDC) between haloperidol (a typical antipsychotic) or olanzapine (atypical antipsychotic) and citalopram (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). A rat two-way conditioned avoidance response paradigm was used to measure antipsychotic activity and determine how DDC may alter the antipsychotic efficacy in this model. Following acquisition of the avoidance response, rats were then randomly assigned to receive vehicle, citalopram (10.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneously), olanzapine (1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously), combined haloperidol with citalopram, or combined olanzapine with citalopram treatment for seven avoidance test sessions. In comparison with antipsychotic treatment alone, combined treatment with citalopram potentiated the antiavoidance effect of olanzapine or haloperidol (to a lesser extent) during the seven drug-test sessions. In addition, repeated pairing of citalopram with haloperidol or olanzapine caused citalopram to show a newly acquired avoidance-disruptive effect. This effect was context specific because citalopram paired with haloperidol or olanzapine outside the avoidance testing context (i.e. home cages) did not show such an effect. These findings indicate that concurrent antidepressant and antipsychotic treatments may engender a DDC process that follows the general Pavlovian associative conditioning principles. They also indicate that adjunctive citalopram treatment may enhance the antipsychotic efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia.

An investigation of the behavioral mechanisms of antipsychotic action using a drug-drug conditioning paradigm

Antipsychotic drugs at noncataleptic doses selectively suppress conditioned avoidance response in rats. In our previous study, we had used a two-way active avoidance response paradigm to show that the antipsychotic-induced interoceptive state is one of the mechanisms underlying the avoidance-disruptive effect of antipsychotics. In this study, we sought to further examine this mechanism using a novel drug-drug conditioning procedure. We made use of the fact that both the typical neuroleptic haloperidol and the atypical neuroleptic olanzapine disrupt conditioned avoidance responding, whereas chlordiazepoxide (an anxiolytic) does not. We reasoned that if the antipsychotic interoceptive state is important in causing a disruption on avoidance responding (an index of antipsychotic efficacy), pairing chlordiazepoxide (a cueing drug conditional stimulus) with haloperidol or olanzapine (a cued drug unconditional stimulus) should engender chlordiazepoxide to exhibit this property and behave like an antipsychotic drug. Chlordiazepoxide exhibited an acquired antipsychotic-like property in disrupting avoidance responding after being repeatedly paired with haloperidol, but not with olanzapine. In contrast, it significantly attenuated the antiavoidance efficacy of olanzapine but not haloperidol after being repeatedly paired with these drugs. This study suggests that the haloperidol-induced interoceptive drug state is directly involved in its antiavoidance action, and chlordiazepoxide may attenuate the antiavoidance efficacy of antipsychotics (especially olanzapine). To the extent that the antiavoidance effect predicts clinical effects of antipsychotic treatment, this study suggests that the antipsychotic-induced interoceptive drug state may be an important behavioral mechanism mediating the clinical effects of antipsychotic treatments.

Conditional attenuation of the antipentylenetetrazol activity of chlordiazepoxide

In a study of drug-drug conditioning, chlordiazepoxide (CDP) was administered to rats 30 min before chlorpromazine (CPZ) every 3-4 days for 5 weeks. Thereafter, CDP was tested for its ability to a) increase animals' exploration of the normally avoided "exposed" arms of a plus-maze (a screening method for anxiolytic substances) and b) protect against seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol (PTZ). The CDP-CPZ conditioning procedure potentiated the usual increase in open-arm activity seen in CDP-injected rats but attenuated the anti-PTZ effect. When injected with CDP 60 min prior to PTZ, rats with a previous history of CDP-CPZ pairings had shorter latencies to seizure onset and showed a greater likelihood of progression to the most severe behavioral indices of a maximal seizure relative to control subjects with a history of backward drug pairings (CPZ-CDP) or pairings of CDP with isotonic saline.

Morphine as a conditioned stimulus in a conditioned emotional response paradigm

A Pavlovian conditioning experiment was conducted to determine whether morphine (6 mg/kg, IP) could act as a conditioned stimulus (CS) when paired with an electric shock unconditioned stimulus (US), and later produce a conditioned suppression of drinking (CR) in water deprived rats. Seven groups were tested for conditioning after exposure to one of the following conditioning procedures: (1) morphine paired with shock; (2) morphine alone with no shock; (3) shock but no morphine; (4) no shock and no morphine; (5) morphine paired with vocalizations of shocked rats; (6) saline paired with shock; (7) saline alone with no shock. Groups 1 and 2 tested whether morphine could act as a CS. Groups 3 and 4 tested for sensitization. Group 5 tested whether exposure to the vocalizations of other rats could act as a US when paired with a morphine CS. Groups 6 and 7 tested whether cues associated with the injection procedure could act as a CS. Only subjects in group 1 showed conditioned suppression of drinking, when compared to control groups. Overall, the results indicate that morphine could act as a conditioned stimulus and that several of the more obvious possible sources of artifact did not significantly contribute to the CR that is produced.

Drug-drug heart rate conditioning in rats: effective USs when pentobarbital is the CS

Injections of two drugs in sequence may be considered the Pavlovian pairing of one drug as a conditioned stimulus (CS) with a second drug as an unconditioned stimulus (US). If pentobarbital was the CS and d-amphetamine or nicotine sulfate the US, then after about four drug-drug pairings the pentobarbital CS produced a higher heart rate (HR) than control conditions. With the same pentobarbital CS, HR conditioning was not obtained with the following USs: atropine, caffeine, lithium chloride, continuous foot-shock, and intermittent foot-shock. Although amphetamine and nicotine are pharmacologically different, a common conditioning mechanism seems indicated because of striking similarities in their parametric effects as USs. There also were strong similarities in these two USs when the conditioned response was a reduced capacity of the CS drug to produce conditioned taste aversions.

Neuroleptic-induced changes in the anxiolytic and myorelaxant properties of diazepam in the rat

Diazepam (2.0 mg/kg) was injected (IP) into rats 30 min before chlorpromazine (2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg) on ten occasions. All doses of chlorpromazine enhanced the capacity of diazepam to increase rats' exploration of the exposed arms of an elevated plus-maze, an animal screening test for anxiolytic and anxiogenic substances. When maze testing occurred during each of the ten diazepam----chlorpromazine trials (after diazepam but before chlorpromazine), this enhancement effect appeared on Trial 6 and persisted thereafter. Haloperidol (3.0 mg/kg, IP) changed diazepam-elicited plus-maze activity in the same manner as chlorpromazine; however, thioridazine (10.0 mg/kg) and pimozide (2.0 mg/kg) were ineffective. Additionally, haloperidol, like chlorpromazine, was found to reduce diazepam's muscle relaxation effect (inclined plane test) as a consequence of diazepam----haloperidol pairings; once again, thioridazine and pimozide proved ineffective. These results suggested that not all neuroleptics will alter diazepam activity, and also that dopamine blockade per se is not sufficient to induce such changes. While the reasons for the enhanced plus-maze effects of diazepam induced by haloperidol and chlorpromazine remain elusive, the diminished myorelaxant effect may be linked to a neuroleptic's capacity to induce muscular side effects: thioridazine and pimozide are far less likely to yield such effects than are chlorpromazine and haloperidol. Haloperidol administered chronically by itself was found to have an effect on diazepam-induced myorelaxation. Administration of this butyrophenone either orally (2.0 mg/kg daily for 22 days) or in depot form (haloperidol decanoate, 60.0 mg/kg IM once a month for four months) caused a diminished effect of diazepam in rats subjected to the inclined plane test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dose effects on heart rate conditioning when pentobarbital is the CS and amphetamine is the US

If sodium pentobarbital is injected into rats 30 min prior to d-amphetamine sulphate on four or five occasions, there is a learned effect of pentobarbital on heart rate. The conditioned response is a higher heart rate than found in rats with a control history of exposure to the same drugs. In Experiment 1, when the pentobarbital dose was 32 mg/kg throughout, this effect was obtained with amphetamine doses of 2, 4, 8, or 16 mg/kg. In Experiment 2, when the amphetamine dose was 12 mg/kg throughout, pentobarbital doses of 16 and 32 mg/kg yielded conditioning, while 8 mg/kg yielded equivocal results.

Diazepam-stress interactions in the rat: effects on autoanalgesia and a plus-maze model of anxiety

On six occasions spaced at least a week apart, two groups of rats were subjected to a variety of stressful conditions consisting of a restraint/bright light complex, either alone or in combination with a tail pinch, whole-body inversion, or partial immersion in cold water. One of these groups was injected with diazepam (2.0 mg/kg) 30 min prior to the stressors, while the other group experienced the drug in their home cages the following day. A third group also received the diazepam but was not exposed to the stressors. In three test sessions all animals were injected with either diazepam or saline and were then exposed to a novel stressor: a plus-maze used as a screening device for anxiolytic drugs. This was immediately followed by a tail-flick measure of analgesia. The longest tail-flick latencies, indicating stress-induced analgesia ("autoanalgesia"), were observed in the group that had not been exposed to stress prior to testing. The other two groups exhibited substantially shorter latencies but did not differ from one another, thus showing a "stress inoculation" effect that was uninfluenced by diazepam. In the plus-maze, diazepam tends to increase the amount of time rats will spend in the two exposed arms of the maze relative to the two enclosed arms. This effect was significantly attenuated in the group that had previously experienced the variety of stressors after a diazepam injection, suggesting a learned association between drug and stress that resulted in a diminution of the drug's anxiolytic property.