Effect of Ro 15-4513 on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference

Mouse strain differences in punished ethanol self-administration

Determining the neural factors contributing to compulsive behaviors such as alcohol-use disorders (AUDs) has become a significant focus of current preclinical research. Comparison of phenotypic differences across genetically distinct mouse strains provides one approach to identify molecular and genetic factors contributing to compulsive-like behaviors. Here we examine a rodent assay for punished ethanol self-administration in four widely used inbred strains known to differ on ethanol-related behaviors: C57BL/6J (B6), DBA/2J (D2), 129S1/SvImJ (S1), and BALB/cJ (BALB). Mice were trained in an operant task (FR1) to reliably lever-press for 10% ethanol using a sucrose-fading procedure. Once trained, mice received a punishment session in which lever pressing resulted in alternating ethanol reward and footshock, followed by tests to probe the effects of punishment on ethanol self-administration. Results indicated significant strain differences in training performance and punished attenuation of ethanol self-administration. S1 and BALB showed robust attenuation of ethanol self-administration after punishment, whereas behavior in B6 was attenuated only when the punishment and probe tests were conducted in the same contexts. By contrast, D2 were insensitive to punishment regardless of context, despite receiving more shocks during punishment and exhibiting normal footshock reactivity. Additionally, B6, but not D2, reduced operant self-administration when ethanol was devalued with a bitter tastant. B6 and D2 showed devaluation of sucrose self-administration, and punished suppression of sucrose seeking was context dependent in both the strains. While previous studies have demonstrated avoidance of ethanol in D2, particularly when ethanol is orally available from a bottle, current findings suggest this strain may exhibit heightened compulsive-like self-administration of ethanol, although there are credible alternative explanations for the phenotype of this strain. In sum, these findings offer a foundation for future studies examining the neural and genetic factors underlying AUDs.

GABAA receptors in the posterior, but not anterior, ventral tegmental area mediate Ro15-4513-induced attenuation of binge-like ethanol consumption in C57BL/6J female mice

GABA(A) receptors have been shown to modulate dopaminergic output from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in studies of both natural and drug rewards, including alcohol. Ro15-4513, the imidazobenzodiazepine derivative and allosteric modulator at the GABA(A) receptor, reliably antagonizes the behavioral effects of alcohol. Various models of alcohol consumption show a decrease in consummatory behaviors, specific to ethanol, following acute administration of the drug. In the present study, Ro15-4513 was systemically administered, or microinjected into the anterior or posterior VTA, to explore the role of GABA(A) receptors at this region in modulating the high pattern of alcohol consumption by C57BL/6J inbred mice in the Drinking in the Dark (DID) model. Animals had 2h access to ethanol for 6 days prior to drug manipulations. Immediately before the seventh day of access, mice were systemically (I.P.) or site-specifically administered Ro15-4513. Systemic Ro15-4513 (at 10mg/kg) decreased binge-like ethanol intake in the DID paradigm. Additionally, there was a stepwise decrease in consumption following Ro15-4513 microinjection into the posterior VTA, with the highest dose significantly decreasing ethanol intake. There was no effect found following microinjection into the anterior VTA, nor was there an effect of systemic or intra-posterior VTA Ro15-4513 on consumption of a 5% sucrose solution or water. The present findings support a role for Ro15-4513 sensitive VTA-GABA(A) receptors in modulating binge-like ethanol consumption. Moreover, the work here adds to the growing body of literature suggesting regional heterogeneity in the VTA.

Effects of the novel endocannabinoid uptake inhibitor, LY2183240, on fear-potentiated startle and alcohol-seeking behaviors in mice selectively bred for high alcohol preference

RATIONALE

Alcohol-use disorders often occur together with anxiety disorders in humans which may be partly due to common inherited genetic factors. Evidence suggests that the endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of individuals with anxiety and/or alcohol-use disorders.

OBJECTIVES

The present study assessed the effects of a novel endocannabinoid uptake inhibitor, LY2183240, on anxiety- and alcohol-seeking behaviors in a unique animal model that may represent increased genetic risk to develop co-morbid anxiety and alcohol-use disorders in humans. Mice selectively bred for high alcohol preference (HAP) show greater fear-potentiated startle (FPS) than mice selectively bred for low alcohol preference (LAP). We examined the effects of LY2183240 on the expression of FPS in HAP and LAP mice and on alcohol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and limited-access alcohol drinking behavior in HAP mice.

RESULTS

Repeated administration of LY2183240 (30 mg/kg) reduced the expression of FPS in HAP but not LAP mice when given prior to a second FPS test 48 h after fear conditioning. Both the 10 and 30 mg/kg doses of LY2183240 enhanced the expression of alcohol-induced CPP and this effect persisted in the absence of the drug. LY2183240 did not alter limited-access alcohol drinking behavior, unconditioned startle responding, or locomotor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ECS modulation influences both conditioned fear and conditioned alcohol reward behavior. LY2183240 may be an effective pharmacotherapy for individuals with anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, but may not be appropriate for individuals with co-morbid anxiety and alcohol-use disorders.

GABA(A) receptor modulation of the rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol

Ethanol has been shown to exert many of its biochemical and behavioral effects through an interaction with the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor system. This review focuses on a subset of studies that has used self-administration, as well as place and taste conditioning, procedures to investigate a role for the GABA(A) receptor system in modulating the rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol. Potential advantages and disadvantages of each procedure are also discussed. A significant amount of evidence supports the suggestion that GABA(A) receptors are important modulators of the motivational effects of ethanol, although most of the findings have been obtained from studies examining oral ethanol self-administration. Relatively fewer studies have investigated ethanol place and taste conditioning. All self-administration studies reviewed used rats, whereas most conditioning studies used mice. Results of these studies show that GABA(A) antagonists and inverse agonists reduce ethanol self-administration under limited-access conditions. The effect of GABA(A) agonists on ethanol self-administration is less clear due to their bidirectional effects. GABA(A) receptor antagonists have been shown to increase ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and conditioned taste aversion in mice and decrease ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in rats. Issues related to interpretation and integration of these findings across models and species are considered. The integration of data from self-administration and conditioning procedures is necessary to define the role of GABA(A) receptors in modulating the rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol and may lead to the development of pharmacotherapies that target GABA(A) receptors to treat alcoholism in human beings.

Motivational effects of ethanol in DARPP-32 knock-out mice

DARPP-32 (dopamine and adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein, 32 kDa) is an important component of dopaminergic function in brain areas thought to be important for drug and alcohol addiction. The present experiments characterized the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion, ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, and ethanol self-administration in DARPP-32 knock-out (KO) mice compared to wild-type (WT) controls. For taste conditioning, KO and WT mice received access to 0.2 m NaCl solution followed immediately by intraperitoneal injection of 0-4 gm/kg ethanol. Ethanol produced dose-dependent conditioned taste aversion that was the same in both genotypes. For place conditioning, KO and WT mice received eight pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (2 gm/kg, i.p.), and a different stimulus with saline. Ethanol produced increases in locomotor activity during conditioning, with KO mice showing higher activity levels after ethanol compared to WT mice. WT mice, but not KO mice, acquired conditioned preference for the ethanol-paired stimulus. In the self-administration procedure, KO and WT mice were trained to lever press for access to 10% v/v ethanol. Subsequently, the mice had 23 hr/d access to food, ethanol, and water. Response patterns were determined using 0-30% v/v ethanol concentrations. WT mice displayed concentration-dependent responding for ethanol. Responding on the ethanol lever by KO mice did not change as a function of ethanol concentration. Saccharin (0.2% w/v) was subsequently added to the ethanol mixture, and responding was examined at 0, 5, 10, and 20% ethanol concentrations. Ethanol responding increased in both genotypes, although WT mice showed higher rates at all concentrations.

Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues

This review gives an overview of recent findings and developments in research on brain mechanisms of reward and reinforcement from studies using the place preference conditioning paradigm, with emphasis on those studies that have been published within the last decade. Methodological issues of the paradigm (such as design of the conditioning apparatus, biased vs unbiased conditioning, state dependency effects) are discussed. Results from studies using systemic and local (intracranial) drug administration, natural reinforcers, and non-drug treatments and from studies examining the effects of lesions are presented. Papers reporting on conditioned place aversion (CPA) experiments are also included. A special emphasis is put on the issue of tolerance and sensitization to the rewarding properties of drugs. Transmitter systems that have been investigated with respect to their involvement in brain reward mechanisms include dopamine, opioids, acetylcholine, GABA, serotonin, glutamate, substance P, and cholecystokinin, the motivational significance of which has been examined either directly, by using respective agonist or antagonist drugs, or indirectly, by studying the effects of these drugs on the reward induced by other drugs. For a number of these transmitters, detailed studies have been conducted to delineate the receptor subtype(s) responsible for the mediation of the observed drug effects, particularly in the case of dopamine, the opioids, serotonin and glutamate. Brain sites that have been implicated in the mediation of drug-induced place conditioning include the 'traditional' brain reward sites, ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens, but the medial prefrontal cortex, ventral pallidum, amygdala and the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus have also been shown to play important roles in the mediation of place conditioning induced by drugs or natural reinforcers. Thus, although the paradigm has also been criticized because of some inherent methodological problems, it is clear that during the past decade place preference conditioning has become a valuable and firmly established and very widely used tool in behavioural pharmacology and addiction research.

Continued trends in the conditioned place preference literature from 1992 to 1996, inclusive, with a cross-indexed bibliography

In light of the overwhelming response to the previous publication in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (1993, 17, 21-41) regarding trends in place conditioning (either preference or aversion), the present work constitutes a five-year follow-up to review the empirical research in this behavioral paradigm from 1992 to 1996, inclusively. The behavioral technique has grown as indicated by the number of publications over the last five years which equals those authored over the 35 years covered by our last survey. The previous work used descriptive statistics to explore topical issues, whereas the present work discusses trends since that time and hopes to provide an exhaustive bibliography of the CPP literature, including articles, published abstracts, book chapters and reviews, as well as providing a cross-index of identified key words/drugs tested.

Fluoxetine's effects on ethanol's rewarding, aversive and stimulus properties

These experiments examined the influence of fluoxetine on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion, and ethanol discrimination. In the place conditioning experiment, male Swiss-Webster mice received 4 pairings of a distinctive floor cue with 2 g/kg ethanol, 10 mg/kg fluoxetine + ethanol, or fluoxetine alone. A different floor was paired with saline. During conditioning ethanol produced locomotor stimulation. Fluoxetine + ethanol resulted in greater levels of locomotor activity during conditioning trials 2-4. Fluoxetine alone also caused increases in activity. Floor preference testing revealed conditioned place preference in groups receiving ethanol. Fluoxetine did not change the magnitude of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference nor produced place conditioning alone. In the taste conditioning procedure, mice received 1-h access to 0.2 M NaCl solution followed by injections of 0, 5 or 10 mg/kg fluoxetine and 0 or 2.5 g/kg ethanol. Ethanol produced reductions in NaCl intake. Fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) enhanced the development of ethanol-conditioned taste aversion but did not cause taste aversion alone. In the ethanol discrimination experiment, mice were trained to respond for 10% sucrose on an FR20 schedule following injections of either 1 g/kg ethanol or saline. Following acquisition, 10 mg/kg fluoxetine pretreatment enhanced ethanol-appropriate responding at a dose of ethanol (0.5 g/kg) below the training dose. These results indicate enhancement of serotonergic activity influences ethanol aversion and discrimination but not ethanol reward.

Effects of 5-HT3, D1 and D2 receptor antagonists on ethanol- and cocaine-induced locomotion

The effects of acute treatment with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, ondansetron and ICS 205-930, on the stimulation of activity induced by ethanol-and cocaine were examined. Ethanol (1.8 or 2 g/kg i.p.) or cocaine (15 mg/kg i.p.) produced a significant increase in locomotor activity (LMA) in DBA/2N mice. Pretreatment with ondansetron or ICS 205-930, in doses ranging from 0.001 to 0.1 mg/kg (s.c), did not modify ethanol or cocaine induced stimulation of activity. In contrast, pretreatment with a 10 micrograms/kg dose of either SCH 23390 or spiperone, a D1 and D2 dopamine (DA) receptor antagonist respectively, completely antagonized the stimulation of LMA induced by ethanol. Similar dose of SCH23390, but not spiperone, blocked the stimulation of activity induced by cocaine. These results indicate that D1 but not D 2 DA receptors play a significant role in cocaine induced hyperactivity whereas both D1 and D2 are involved the locomotor activating effects of ethanol.

Reduced sensitivity to ethanol reward, but not ethanol aversion, in mice lacking 5-HT1B receptors

Various serotonergic receptor systems are thought to influence the motivational effects of ethanol. This experiment characterized the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion and ethanol-induced conditioned place reference in mutant knockout mice lacking 5-HT1b receptors. In the taste conditioning procedure, adult homozygous knockout mice (-/-) and homozygous wild-type mice (+/+) received access to 0.2 M NaCl solution, followed immediately by intraperitoneal injection of 0 to 4 g/kg of ethanol. Ethanol produced dose-dependent conditioned taste aversion that was the same in both genotypes. In the place conditioning procedure, knockout and wild-type mice received six pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, i.p.). A different tactile stimulus was paired with saline. Ethanol produced increases in locomotor activity, with wild-type mice showing higher levels of ethanol-stimulated activity than knockout mice during conditioning trials 5 and 6. Wild-type mice demonstrated conditioned place preference for the ethanol-paired stimulus. In contrast, knockout mice showed no evidence of place conditioning. These results are generally consistent with an important role for serotonergic systems in ethanol reward and specifically indicate that 5-HT1b receptors are important for ethanol's rewarding effects but not for ethanol's aversive effects.

Dose- and conditioning trial-dependent ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in Swiss-Webster mice

The motivational effects of ethanol were examined in Swiss-Webster mice using an unbiased place conditioning, design. Adult male Swiss-Webster mice received six 5-min pairings of a tactile stimulus with different doses of ethanol (1, 2, 3, or 4 g/kg. IP). A different tactile stimulus was paired with saline injections. A 60-min preference test was given after the first four conditioning trials and an additional 30-min preference test after the sixth conditioning trial. During conditioning, ethanol initially produced locomotor stimulation at the 2 g/kg dose and locomotor depression at the 4 g/kg dose. However, after repeated ethanol exposure, all doses produced overall increases in activity relative to saline, suggesting sensitization to ethanol's stimulant effect. After four conditioning trials ethanol-induced conditioned place preference was noted in mice receiving 3 and 4 g/kg ethanol. After two additional conditioning trials all ethanol doses produced conditioned place preference. These results indicate that ethanol has dose-dependent rewarding effects measured in an unbiased place-conditioning paradigm using a standard outbred mouse strain. Further, additional place-conditioning trials enhance the development of preference at lower (1 or 2 g/kg) ethanol doses.

Haloperidol prevents ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity but fails to block sensitization

The effect of the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol on the development of sensitization to ethanol-induced increases in locomotor activity was examined in DBA/2J mice. In Experiment 1, different groups of mice were given saline or ethanol (2 g/kg) immediately before each of four locomotor activity sessions (48-h intervals), and 1 h after pretreatment with saline, 0.10 or 0.15 mg/kg haloperidol. During a subsequent test, mice showed locomotor sensitization despite blockade of ethanol stimulated activity by haloperidol on the first conditioning trial. Moreover, test session activity was reduced in subjects that had previously received haloperidol, even though haloperidol was not present during testing. The second experiment examined the nature of the latter finding by comparing subjects that received equal exposure to haloperidol but differed in the pairing of its administration with the activity chambers. After four conditioning trials, each group was tested in the absence of haloperidol. Mice that had previously received haloperidol paired with the activity chambers were less active than control groups, suggesting development of a conditioned suppression of activity. Overall, these results suggest a dissociation of the neurobiological mechanisms that mediate the acute locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol and those mediating sensitization. Further, these studies illustrate the importance of antagonist-alone control groups that assess the possible influence of associative learning induced by the antagonist itself.

Localization of genes influencing ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in BXD recombinant inbred mice

Genetic differences in ethanol's ability to induce conditioned place preference were studied in 20 BXD Recombinant Inbred (RI) mouse strains and in the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J progenitor strains. Male mice from each strain were exposed to a Pavlovian conditioning procedure in which a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) was paired four times with ethanol (2 g/kg). A different floor stimulus (CS-) was paired with saline. Control mice were injected only with saline. Floor preference testing without ethanol revealed significant genetic differences in conditioned place preference, with some strains spending nearly 80% time on the ethanol-paired floor while others spent only 50% (i.e., no preference). Control mice showed genetic differences in unconditioned preference for the floor cues, but unconditioned preference was not genetically correlated with conditioned preference. There were also substantial genetic differences in ethanol-stimulated activity, but contrary to psychomotor stimulant theory, ethanol-induced activity on conditioning trials was not positively correlated with strength of conditioned place preference. However, there was a significant negative genetic correlation (r = -0.42) between test session activity and preference. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses showed strong associations (P < 0.01) between conditioned place preference and marker loci on chromosomes 4, 8, 9, 18 and 19. Weaker associations (0.01 < P < 0.05) were identified on several other chromosomes. Analysis also yielded several significant QTL for unconditioned preference, ethanol-stimulated activity, and sensitization. Overall, these data support the conclusion that genotype influences ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, presumably via genetic differences in sensitivity to ethanol's rewarding effects. Moreover, several chromosomal regions containing candidate genes of potential relevance to ethanol-induced conditioned place preference have been identified.

Species difference in sensitivity to ethanol's hedonic effects

Recent research suggests that rats and mice differ in their sensitivity to ethanol's rewarding effect in the place conditioning paradigm. However, these species have not previously been examined in a comparable manner. The present study compared genetically heterogeneous rats and mice using an identical place conditioning procedure. Each animal received four pairings of a distinctive tactile floor stimulus with injection of ethanol (1.5 g/kg); a different tactile stimulus was paired with saline injection. Ethanol suppressed activity in rats but elevated activity in mice. As in most previous studies with drug-naive animals, rats showed aversion whereas mice showed preference for the ethanol-paired stimulus. This difference cannot be attributed to differences in housing conditions, apparatus, stimuli, or temporal parameters. Rather, it appears to represent a species difference in initial sensitivity to ethanol's hedonic effects. If one assumes that ethanol is both rewarding and aversive, this outcome might be explained by a species difference in tolerance/sensitization, the time-course of the biphasic hedonic response to a single ethanol exposure, or selective association. Together with other recent studies from this laboratory, the present findings suggest the mouse may well be the species of choice for studying preferences conditioned by ethanol.