Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of a low nitrous oxide concentration in humans

Mechanisms Involved in the Neurotoxicity and Abuse Liability of Nitrous Oxide: A Narrative Review

The recreational use of nitrous oxide (N₂O) has increased over the years. At the same time, more N₂O intoxications are presented to hospitals. The incidental use of N₂O is relatively harmless, but heavy, frequent and chronic use comes with considerable health risks. Most importantly, N₂O can inactivate the co-factor cobalamin, which, in turn, leads to paresthesia's, partial paralysis and generalized demyelinating polyneuropathy. In some patients, these disorders are irreversible. Several metabolic cascades have been identified by which N₂O can cause harmful effects. Because these effects mostly occur after prolonged use, it raises the question of whether N₂O has addictive properties, explaining its prolonged and frequent use at high dose. Several lines of evidence for N₂O's dependence liability can be found in the literature, but the underlying mechanism of action remains controversial. N₂O interacts with the opioid system, but N₂O also acts as an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, by which it can cause dopamine disinhibition. In this narrative review, we provide a detailed description of animal and human evidence for N₂O-induced abuse/dependence and for N₂O-induced neurotoxicity.

Does environmental exposure to the greenhouse gas, N2O, contribute to etiological factors in neurodevelopmental disorders? A mini-review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Neurodevelopmental disorders are increasing in prevalence worldwide. Previous work suggests that exposure to the environmental air pollutant and greenhouse gas - nitrous oxide (N₂O) - may be an etiological factor in neurodevelopmental disorders through the targeting of several neural correlates.

METHODOLOGY

While a number of recent systematic reviews have addressed the role of general anesthesia in the surgical setting and neurodevelopmental outcomes, a narrative mini-review was conducted to first define and characterize the relevant variables (i.e., N₂O, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD] and autism spectrum disorders [ASD]) and their potential interactions into a coherent, hypothesis-generating work. The narrative mini-review merges basic principles in environmental science, anesthesiology, and psychiatry to more fully develop the novel hypotheses that neurodevelopmental impairment found in conditions like ADHD and ASD may be due to exposure to the increasing air pollutant, N₂O.

RESULTS

The results of the present mini-review indicate that exposure to N₂O, even at non-toxic doses, may modulate central neurotransmission and target many neural substrates directly implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, including the glutamatergic, opioidergic, cholinergic, and dopaminergic systems. Epidemiological studies also indicate that early and repeated exposure to general anesthesia, including N₂O, may contribute to later adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence and subsequent hypotheses suggest that a renewed interest be taken in the toxicological assessment of environmental N₂O exposure using validated biomarkers and psychiatric endpoints. Given the relevance of N₂O as a greenhouse gas, societies may also wish to engage in a more robust monitoring and reporting of N₂O levels in the environment for climactic benefit as well.

A review of human drug self-administration procedures

Drug self-administration procedures in laboratory settings allow us to closely model drug-taking behavior in real-world settings. This review provides an overview of many of the common self-administration methods used in human laboratory research. Typically, self-administration studies provide a quantifiable measure of the reinforcing effect of a drug, which is believed to be predictive of its potential for abuse. Several adaptations of the self-administration paradigm exist, the simplest of which allows participants free access to the drug under investigation. Free-access procedures allow investigators to observe patterns of drug self-administration and drug effects in a controlled setting. Allowing participants to choose between two simultaneously available reinforcers (choice procedures) is another well-established method of assessing the reinforcing effects of a drug. Offering a choice between two reinforcers (e.g. two different doses of the same drug, two different drugs, or drug and nondrug reinforcers) provides researchers with a point of comparison (e.g. between a drug of known abuse potential and a novel drug). When combined with other endpoints, such as subjective effects ratings, physiological responses, and cognitive performance, human self-administration paradigms have contributed significantly to our understanding of the factors that contribute to, maintain, and alter drug-taking behavior including: craving, positive subjective effects, toxicity, drug interactions and abstinence. This area of research has also begun to incorporate other techniques such as imaging and genetics to further understand the multifaceted nature of substance abuse. The present paper summarizes the different self-administration techniques that are commonly used today and the application of other procedures that may complement interpretation of the drug self-administration findings.

Lack of sex differences to the subjective effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have assessed subjective effects of nitrous oxide, few studies have analyzed for sex differences. Since sex differences have been reported in subjective effects of several drugs such as opioids, nicotine and alcohol, we sought to determine if sex modulates the subjective effects of the inhalant, nitrous oxide, in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Thirty-eight females and seventy-two males from nine studies that were conducted in our laboratory were included in this retrospective analysis. All experimental studies utilized randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated measures designs in which subjects inhaled 30% nitrous oxide in oxygen and 100% oxygen (placebo). Dependent measures in this analysis were subjective effects measured at baseline and 15 min into the inhalation period.

RESULTS

Nitrous oxide produced a number of subjective effects, including those that could be considered abuse liability-related ("elated," "having pleasant thoughts," drug liking), but sex did not modulate these effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Females and males showed similar subjective responses to 30% nitrous oxide. Future prospective studies might assess other concentrations, other measures (choice, analgesic response), and other inhaled general anesthetics to more comprehensively characterize the role of sex in response to inhalants.

Nitrous oxide acutely suppresses ethanol consumption in HAD and P rats

Nitrous oxide (N2O) has been reported to reduce post-withdrawal craving in alcoholic humans, aiding in their continued abstinence. This article assessed the ability of N2O to suppress alcohol drinking in genetically selected high alcohol-drinking (HAD) and alcohol-preferring (P) rats. Although water was available ad libitum, they were accustomed to a limited access (1 h/day) choice between 10% ethanol (EtOH) and water. When drinking stabilized, the rats were exposed for 30, 60, or 120 min to a mixture of N2O and pure oxygen, timed to end 1 h before the limited access. N2O suppressed EtOH consumption at 1, but not 25 h after exposure in both HAD and P rats. This result is consistent with the efficacy of N2O for acute reduction of EtOH drinking, and supports further research into the use of N2O as an adjunct to treatment.

The anesthetics nitrous oxide and ketamine are more neurotoxic to old than to young rat brain

Nitrous oxide (N2O) and ketamine are common general anesthetics and antagonists of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors. In clinically relevant concentrations, they induce a psychotomimetic reaction in humans and pathomorphological changes in the rat brain. We have previously shown that ketamine and N2O in combination cause the neurotoxic reaction in young adult rat brain that is apparently synergistic. Ketamine and N2O are occasionally used in geriatric anesthesia since they do not suppress cardiorespiratory function and thus are beneficial for frail elderly patients. However, in view of the evidence that N2O and ketamine have potentially serious neurotoxic effects, and that they potentiate one another's neurotoxicity, their neurotoxic potential in the aging brain needs to be evaluated. In this study we compared the neurotoxicity of ketamine and N2O, alone or in combination, in aging (18- and 24-month-old) rats and in young adult (6-month-old) rats and found that the aging brain is substantially more sensitive than the young adult brain to the neurotoxic reaction induced by either ketamine alone or the ketamine + N2O combination, but equally sensitive to the neurotoxicity induced by N2O alone.

Reinforcing and subjective effects of the volatile anesthetic, sevoflurane

Sevoflurane is a volatile anesthetic that is chemically similar to volatile substances of abuse and can be safely administered to humans in laboratory research. In this study, the reinforcing and subjective effects of five concentrations of sevoflurane (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8% sevoflurane in O2) were studied in 20 non-drug-abusers. During each of five sessions, subjects sampled a concentration of sevoflurane and 100% O2 (placebo) for 10 min each. Later, within the session, they chose nine times, once every 5 min, among sevoflurane (e.g. "Agent A"), placebo (e.g. "Agent B"), or neither (and were administered 100% O2, identified as "drug-free air"). Although "neither" was selected most frequently, mean preference ratios (sevoflurane choices/[sevoflurane choices+placebo choices]) and total sevoflurane choice peaked at the 0.4% concentration. Choice patterns varied across subjects, with some subjects never choosing sevoflurane and other subjects showing monotonic increasing or bitonic concentration-choice functions. Concentration-related increases in subjective effects were observed, including effects that are putatively associated with abuse liability. Ratings of drug liking and of wanting to inhale the drug again were positively correlated with sevoflurane choice. This study shows that sevoflurane can function as a reinforcer and produce abuse liability-related subjective effects in some healthy volunteers.

Bitonic dose-response functions for reinforcing and self-reported effects of nitrous oxide in humans

The reinforcing and self-reported effects of nitrous oxide (10%, 30%, and 50% N(2)O in O(2)) were examined in 13 humans. During each of three sessions, subjects sampled one dose of N(2)O and 100% O(2) (placebo) for 10 min each, separated by 30-min recovery periods. The agents were identified by letter code, and later in the session, subjects chose nine times, once every 5 min, among N(2)O (e.g., "Agent A"), placebo (e.g., "Agent B"), or "neither" (also 100% O(2), identified as "drug-free air"). Self-reported and psychomotor effects were measured at various times. Dose-response functions varied across subjects and included bitonic, monotonic increasing, monotonic decreasing, U-shaped, and flat dose-response functions for reinforcing and/or self-reported effects. For subjects who showed bitonic reinforcing effects, the descending limb of the dose-response function could not be attributed to behavioral impairment. This study replicates previous studies showing dose-dependent effects of N(2)O, as well as between-subject variability in N(2)O effects. Bitonic dose-response functions for some subjects extend the generality of the phenomenon of bitonicity of drug effects to N(2)O effects in humans.

Analysis of the reinforcing and subjective effects of different doses of nitrous oxide using a free-choice procedure

The reinforcing and subjective effects of five doses of nitrous oxide (0, 10, 20, 30, 40% N(2)O in O(2)) were studied in 20 non-drug-abusers using a free-choice procedure. During each of five sessions, subjects sampled a dose of N(2)O and 100% O(2) (placebo) for 10 min each. Later they chose nine times, once every 5 min, among N(2)O (e.g. 'Agent A'), placebo (e.g. 'Agent B'), or a no-drug option. Mean preference ratios (N(2)O choices/[N(2)O choices+placebo choices]) and total N(2)O choice increased with increasing N(2)O dose. Individual preference ratios suggested that at least one active dose of N(2)O functioned as a reinforcer in 80% of subjects, and the doses that functioned as reinforcers varied across subjects. N(2)O choice was positively correlated with end-of-session and post-session ratings of N(2)O liking and of wanting to inhale N(2)O again, but not with ratings of those effects during sampling. Placebo was chosen significantly less than the no-drug option, even though both were 100% O(2). More robust reinforcing effects of N(2)O were observed in this subject population than in previous studies. Choice data emphasize the importance of examining a range of doses, and of examining those effects within-subject, when assessing reinforcing effects of drugs. Inclusion of the no-drug option eliminated the 'forced' choice of placebo, making preference ratios easier to interpret than in previous, forced-choice procedures. Reinforcing effects were more correlated with subjective effects assessed after the session than with subjective effects obtained while subjects were under the influence of the drug.

Within- and between-subject variability in the reinforcing and subjective effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers

Within- and between-subject variability in the reinforcing and subjective effects of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) was studied across five sessions. Twelve volunteers with no history of drug dependence sampled 30% N(2)O and 100% oxygen for 10 min each, then chose nine times, once every 5 min, among N(2)O (e.g. "Agent A"), oxygen (e.g. "Agent B"), or "drug-free air." Choice varied across subjects but was stable within subjects. Quantitative differences in subjective effects occurred within and across subjects. Some subjective effects were correlated with choice and/or differed between subjects who were consistent choosers of N(2)O versus those who were not. However, drug liking and euphoria, two face-valid measures of abuse liability, were unrelated to choice. Thus, the present study found individual differences (i.e. between-subject variability) in subjective and reinforcing effects of N(2)O and, in terms of within-subject variability, suggested that subjective effects fluctuate across sessions to a relatively greater extent than do reinforcing effects. The varying degrees of correlation between N(2)O choice and its subjective effects emphasize the need for obtaining multiple measures when characterizing abuse liability of this drug.

Effects of information on the reinforcing, subjective, and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers

The purpose of this study was to characterize the reinforcing, subjective, and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) in healthy volunteers who were given different amounts of information regarding the drugs they were being administered in the experiment. A choice procedure was used in which subjects first sampled a placebo and a given concentration of N2O and then chose between the two. N2O concentration varied across the four-session experiment from 10-40%. Besides choice, subjective and psychomotor effects served as dependent measures. In the INFORMED group (n = 11), subjects were told at the beginning of each sampling trial what concentration of N2O they were inhaling or whether they were inhaling 100% oxygen (placebo). They were also informed about the prototypic effects of N2O (e.g. tingling or numbing, euphoria, dysphoria) and oxygen (e.g. no discernible effects). In the NON-INFORMED group (n = 11), subjects were only told at the beginning of each sampling trial that the drugs they would be inhaling came from one of six classes of drugs. Thirty percent N2O was chosen by a significantly higher proportion of subjects than expected by chance in the INFORMED group, but not in the NON-INFORMED group. Further, the probability of choosing 20-40% N2O was higher in the INFORMED group than in the NON-INFORMED group. Subjective effects of N2O were not affected by the information manipulation. Psychomotor performance at the highest N2O concentration tested (40%) was impaired to a greater extent in the NON-INFORMED than in the INFORMED group. We conclude that the reinforcing effects of N2O, and perhaps the impairing effects, can be modulated by telling subjects beforehand that they are inhaling N2O and what effects they might be expected to experience from the drug.

The effects of alcohol history on the reinforcing, subjective and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers

The purpose of this study was to characterize the reinforcing, subjective and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers with different alcohol histories. Subjects were divided into two groups: light drinkers (n = 9) and moderate drinkers (n = 10). A choice procedure was used in which subjects first sampled placebo and a given concentration of nitrous oxide, and then chose between the two. Nitrous oxide concentration varied across the four-session experiment from 10-40%. Besides choice, subjective and psychomotor effects served as dependent measures. The majority of subjective effects of nitrous oxide, and its psychomotor-impairing effects, did not vary as a function of drinking group. However, a Wilcoxon rank sum test showed that the median number of times moderate drinkers chose nitrous oxide (three) was significantly higher than the median number of times light drinkers chose nitrous oxide (one). This study provides suggestive evidence that the reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide are modulated by alcohol history.

Effects of marijuana history on the subjective, psychomotor, and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide in humans

An experiment using marijuana users and non-users was conducted to assess whether the reinforcing, subjective, or psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide were influenced by a subject's drug history. Subjects in the first four sessions sampled 40% nitrous oxide in oxygen and 100% oxygen (placebo), and then over the next three sessions, chose which agent they wished to inhale. Choice distributions between the two groups did not differ significantly, and nitrous oxide choice rates were less than 50% in both groups. However, a history of marijuana use appeared to intensify some of the subjective effects induced by nitrous oxide inhalation.

Time course of effects of brief inhalations of nitrous oxide in normal volunteers

Nitrous oxide is commonly used (abused) recreationally by inhaling it in a bolus form (i.e. single or several breaths). The time course of the psychoactive effects of nitrous oxide, via this mode of inhalation, has not been adequately characterized and thus formed the basis for this study. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in four sessions, using a randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled design. In each session one of the following four measures were assessed: self-reported strength of drug effects, mood, memory and psychomotor performance. Within sessions, subjects were exposed to four different concentrations of nitrous oxide in a randomized fashion: 0% (oxygen-placebo), 40%, 60% and 80%. At each concentration, or "trial", subjects took four deep breaths of the gas. Peak drug effects, as reported by our subjects, occurred within 30 seconds after the last inhalation of nitrous oxide, persisted for about a minute, and then gradually subsided to near-baseline levels by 5 minutes post-inhalation. Certain aspects of mood were briefly affected by nitrous oxide, generally in a dose-related fashion with increases in visual analog scale ratings of "anxious", "stimulated", "coasting (spaced out)", "lightheaded", "confused", and "high". Free recall of wards that had been presented between 30 and 60 seconds post-inhalation was significantly reduced after 80% nitrous oxide, relative to oxygen-placebo. There was a trend towards psychomotor impairment (Concentration x time: p = 0.08), as measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test, with peak decrements in performance (about a minute after inhalation) being greater after 80% nitrous oxide than after 0% nitrous oxide. Our results suggest that there arc acute, albeit brief, adverse effects of inhaling bolus concentrations of nitrous oxide.