Buprenorphine as a stimulus in drug discrimination learning: an assessment of mu and kappa receptor activity

Effects of Buprenorphine on the Memory and Learning Deficit Induced by Methamphetamine Administration in Male Rats

Little is known about the effects of methamphetamine (Meth) and buprenorphine (Bup) on memory and learning in rats. The aim of this investigation was to examine the impact of Meth and Bup on memory and learning. Fourteen male Wistar rats weighing 250–300 g were assigned to four groups: Sham, Meth, Bup, and Meth + Bup and were treated for 1 week. Spatial learning and memory, avoidance learning, and locomotion were assessed using the Morris water maze, passive avoidance learning, and open field tests, respectively. Meth and Bup impaired spatial learning and memory in rats. Co-administration of Meth + Bup did not increase the time spent in the target quadrant compared to Meth alone in the MWM. The Bup and Meh + Bup groups were found with an increase in step-through latency (STLr) and a decrease in the time spent in the dark compartment (TDC). Meth and Bup had no effects on locomotor activity in the open field test. Bup showed a beneficial effect on aversive memory. Since Bup demonstrates fewer side effects than other opioid drugs, it may be preferable for the treatment of avoidance memory deficits in patients with Meth addiction.

Conditioned Taste Avoidance Drug Discrimination Procedure: Assessments and Applications

In the present chapter, we summarize much of the work on the taste avoidance drug discrimination procedure, presenting the logic for its initial introduction and the extension of the procedure in the investigation of the discriminative properties of various drugs. Results from these assessments parallel those from more traditional operant and maze designs in classifying and characterizing the discriminative properties of drug. At the same time, this design reveals a procedure that is sensitive in such assessments by indexing these stimulus properties more rapidly and at lower doses than in the more traditional procedures (in some cases for drugs heretofore resistant in their detection). Importantly, much remains to be learned about the taste avoidance procedure in that the nature of such learning remains unknown and the specific parameters under which it can be established and generalized and its neurochemical and neuroanatomical bases are largely unexplored. The application of drug discrimination learning to human drug abuse continues to be an important consideration for this specific design (as well as that of drug discrimination procedures in general), and recent parallels between drug use and food intake in terms of its regulation by interoceptive stimuli suggests a possible role of the loss of stimulus control in drug escalation and addiction (with possible therapeutic implications via the modulation of these interoceptive cues).

Application of the conditioned taste aversion paradigm to assess discriminative stimulus properties of psychostimulants in rats

BACKGROUND

The conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm is one of the reliable methods to evaluate the discriminative stimulus properties of drugs and is characterized by a short conditioning period and no need for special equipment. This method, however, has not yet been fully investigated for psychostimulants such as cocaine and methamphetamine.

METHODS

In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate between cocaine and a vehicle using CTA and substitution tests with various psychostimulants were conducted to evaluate the usefulness of the method for assessing the discriminative stimulus properties of this pharmacological class. Male rats received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of cocaine (10mg/kg) 10 min prior to access saccharin for 20-min, and immediately after the saccharin access they received an i.p. dose of LiCl (1.8 mEq; n=8, Group CL) or the vehicle (n=8, Group CW) on the day of conditioning; on the other days (2 or 3 days between the cocaine conditioning days), they were injected with saline prior to access to saccharin without the LiCl or vehicle injection after the access.

RESULTS

By the fifteenth cocaine conditioning trial, all animals acquired discrimination. In the substitution test, cocaine dose dependently decreased saccharin consumption. The psychostimulants, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, bupropion and sibutramine, substituted for cocaine, whereas the opioid μ agonist morphine and the cannabinoid agonist, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, did not substitute for cocaine. Mazindol did not substitute for cocaine although it has CNS stimulant activities.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that discriminative stimulus properties of psychostimulants can be evaluated using the CTA paradigm.

Discriminative stimulus properties of naloxone in Long-Evans rats: assessment with the conditioned taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning

RATIONALE

The characterization of the discriminative stimulus properties of naloxone has focused primarily on its actions at the mu opioid receptor, although naloxone also displays an affinity for delta and kappa receptor subtypes.

OBJECTIVES

The present study extends this characterization of the naloxone cue by investigating if relatively specific antagonists for the mu (naltrexone: 0.10-0.56 mg/kg), delta (naltrindole: 1-18 mg/kg), and kappa (MR2266: 1.8-10 mg/kg) opioid receptor subtypes will substitute for naloxone in animals trained to discriminate naloxone from its vehicle. The temporal nature of the naloxone cue was examined by varying pretreatment time points (15, 30, 45, 60 min). Finally, various doses of naltrexone methobromide (1-18 mg/kg) were assessed to determine peripheral mediation of the cue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female Long-Evans rats (N = 30) received an injection of naloxone (1 mg/kg; i.p.) 15 min prior to a pairing of saccharin (20-min access) and the emetic LiCl (1.8 mEq; i.p.; n = 16, group NL) or vehicle (n = 14, group NW); on other days, they were injected with saline prior to saccharin alone. Substitution tests with compounds with various receptor affinities and selective CNS and PNS actions were then assessed.

RESULTS

Only naloxone and naltrexone produced dose-dependent decreases in saccharin consumption. Naloxone administered at 15 and 30 min before saccharin produced decreases in consumption similar to that displayed on training days. Naltrexone methobromide substituted only at the highest dose tested (18 mg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

Naloxone's stimulus effects appear to be mediated centrally via activity at the mu opioid receptor.

Delta opioid discrimination learning in the rat: assessment with the selective delta agonist SNC80

The majority of reports assessing opioid drug discrimination learning (DDL) have concentrated on characterizing the stimulus properties of compounds selective for mu and kappa opioid receptors. Assessments of delta opioid DDL have been limited and, to date, these assessments have been restricted to the monkey and pigeon. No assessment of delta stimulus control has been examined in rodents. To that end, the present experiment examined discriminative control by the selective delta agonist SNC80 in rats and its generalization to and antagonism by compounds relatively selective to the delta and mu receptor subtypes using the conditioned taste aversion baseline of DDL. Animals injected with 5.6 mg/kg of SNC80 prior to a saccharin-LiCl pairing and with the SNC80 vehicle prior to saccharin alone acquired the discrimination within seven conditioning cycles. The discriminative effects of SNC80 were maximal at 20 min, partial at 120 min, and lost at 240 min. The discrimination was dose dependent in that as the dose of SNC80 increased, the amount of saccharin consumed decreased. In subsequent generalization tests, the delta agonist SNC162 produced SNC80-appropriate responding at a dose of 18 mg/kg. Conversely, the mu agonist morphine produced vehicle-appropriate responding at all doses tested. These selective generalization patterns with SNC162 and morphine suggest that the discriminative effects of SNC80 are mediated at the delta, but not the mu, receptor, a conclusion supported by the fact that SNC80's discriminative control was completely blocked by the delta-selective antagonist NTI, but not by the mu-selective antagonist naltrexone. The present findings indicate that not only do rats readily discriminate both mu- and kappa-selective agonists from their respective vehicles, but they also discriminate compounds that are selective for the delta receptor subtype, thus extending the class of compounds that can serve such discriminative functions for the rat.

The effects of aminotriazole and acetaldehyde on an ethanol drug discrimination with a conditioned taste aversion procedure

The present study was designed to investigate whether acetaldehyde shares stimulus properties with ethanol using the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) baseline of drug discrimination learning. Animals were trained to discriminate ethanol (0.8 g/kg, i.p.) from saline using 11 consecutive cycles consisting of a pairing day and three nonpairing days. On pairing days, all animals were injected with ethanol 30 min prior to a 20-min limited access to a saccharin solution (0.1% w/v) and then immediately injected with either LiCl (0.15 M, 1.8 meq) or distilled water. On the three following nonpairing days, animals were injected with saline and 30 min later presented with the same saccharin solution for 20 min. No injections followed on these nonpairing days. Results showed that animals acquired discriminative stimulus control for ethanol after seven pairings. Pretreatment with the catalase inhibitor did not alter the discriminative control for ethanol. Generalization tests revealed that acetaldehyde substituted for ethanol at a dose of 0.3 g/kg. The results of the present study suggest that catalase inhibition did not reverse or alter the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. However, generalization tests showed that acetaldehyde (0.3 g/kg) will substitute for ethanol suggesting that these two drugs share some similar properties.

Nalorphine's ability to substitute for morphine in a drug discrimination procedure is a function of training dose

Rats trained to discriminate the mu agonists fentanyl or morphine from their respective vehicles generalize to the partial mu agonist nalorphine incompletely and inconsistently. Any number of factors may influence the generalization patterns obtained, one of which being the specific dose of the full opioid agonist used during training, a factor reported to influence generalization with other partial opioid agonists. To assess if training dose influences stimulus generalization to nalorphine and to support its role in the aforementioned variability across studies, in the present experiments rats were trained to discriminate either a low (5.6 mg/kg) or a high (10 mg/kg) dose of morphine from distilled water within the taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning. Subjects were then given a range of doses of morphine, nalorphine, methadone, or naloxone to assess the degree of substitution (if any) of these compounds for the training dose of morphine. For all subjects, morphine fully substituted for itself, and the opioid antagonist naloxone failed to substitute for the morphine cue. Rats generalized the morphine cue to nalorphine in subjects trained at the lower dose but not in subjects trained at the higher dose. Rats generalized the morphine cue to methadone in the latter group (the high dose group), indicating that the failure to generalize to nalorphine in this group was not a general inability of an opioid agonist to substitute for morphine. Naloxone blocked morphine stimulus control in all subjects and nalorphine control in the low-dose group for which nalorphine substituted for morphine, suggesting that morphine control (and the nalorphine substitution) was based on opioid activity. These results indicate that the substitution patterns of nalorphine in morphine-trained subjects are a function in part of the dose of morphine used in training and support the position that nalorphine is a partial opioid agonist with intermediate efficacy.

Modulation of emesis by fentanyl and opioid receptor antagonists in Suncus murinus (house musk shrew)

The anti-emetic mechanism of action of fentanyl to inhibit nicotine (5 mg/kg, s.c.)-induced emesis was investigated in Suncus murinus. The anti-emetic action of fentanyl (40 microg/kg, s.c.) was antagonised by the opioid receptor antagonists naltrexone (1 mg/kg, s.c.), naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c.), M8008 (16S-methylcyprenorphine; 1 mg/kg, s.c.) and MR 2266 (5,9-diethyl-2-(3-furylmethyl)2'-hydroxy-7,7-benzomorphan; 1 mg/kg) but not by naloxone methylbromide (1 mg/kg, s.c.), naloxone methyliodide (1 mg/kg, s.c.), naltrindole (1 mg/kg, s.c.), DIPPA (2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-[1S)-1-(3-isothiocyanatophenyl)-2-(1- pyrrolidinyl)-ethyl]acetamide; 3 mg/kg, i.p.) or naloxonazine (35 mg/kg, i.p.). This indicates an involvement of mu2-opioid receptors within the brain to mediate the anti-emetic effect of fentanyl. In other studies, naloxone 10-60 mg/kg, s.c. induced dose-related emesis but naltrexone was only emetic at 60 mg/kg, s.c. and naloxone methylbromide failed to induce emesis at doses up to 60 mg/kg, s.c. The emesis induced by a high dose of naloxone 60 mg/kg, s.c. was antagonized by CP-99,994 ((+)-(2S,3S)-3-(2-methoxybenzylamino)-2-phenylpiperidine; 3-30 mg/kg, i.p.), 8-OH-DPAT, ((+/-)-8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin; 0.003-0.3 mg/kg, s.c.), buspirone (3 mg/kg, s.c.) and fluphenazine (1-3 mg/kg, i.p.) but not by naltrexone (1-30 mg/kg, s.c.), metoclopramide (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.), sulpiride (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.), domperidone (0.1-3 mg/kg, i.p.), ondansetron (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.), granisetron (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.), scopolamine (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.) or promethazine (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.). The data is discussed in relation to opioid receptor mechanisms moderating emesis and the identification of potential sites of drug action available to inhibit the emetic reflex.

Effects of mu- and delta-opioid-receptor antagonists on the stimulus properties of cholecystokinin

Melton and Riley recently reported that the relatively selective mu-opioid-antagonist naloxone potentiated the stimulus properties of the gut peptide cholecystokinin (CCK). To assess whether such opioid potentiation is limited to activity at the mu-receptor subtype, in the present experiment the effects of the highly selective delta-antagonist naltrindole on CCK's stimulus properties were examined. Because in the initial report of naloxone's potentiation of CCK a relatively high, nonphysiologic dose of CCK (i.e., 13 micrograms/kg) was used as the training drug, in the current analysis subjects were trained to discriminate 5.6 micrograms/kg CCK from its vehicle and the assessments and comparisons of the effects of naloxone and naltrindole were based on this dose. Specifically, rats were administered 5.6 micrograms/kg CCK before saccharin-LiCl pairings and the CCK vehicle before saccharin alone. With such training, they rapidly acquired the drug discrimination, avoiding saccharin consumption when it was preceded by CCK and consuming the same saccharin solution when it was preceded by its vehicle. In subsequent generalization tests, doses of CCK that were ineffective in suppressing saccharin consumption (i.e., did not substitute for the training dose of CCK) did result in the suppression of saccharin consumption when combined with doses of the mu antagonist naloxone that alone had no effect on saccharin intake. On the other hand, the highly selective delta-opioid-receptor antagonist naltrindole was ineffective in potentiating the effects of CCK. Specifically, when naltrindole was combined with ineffective doses of CCK, subjects drank at control levels. The ability of naloxone to potentiate CCK's stimulus effects is consistent with a range of other demonstrations of the role of the mu-opioid-receptor subtype in CCK-opioid interactions, although the specific basis for the interaction remains unknown. Given recent findings on the effects of delta agonists and antagonists on CCK-induced activity, the failure of naltrindole to potentiate CCK's stimulus effects may be due to the absence of delta activity within this preparation, rather than the absence of delta mediation of CCK-opioid interactions in general.

The effects of chronic morphine on the generalization of buprenorphine stimulus control: an assessment of kappa antagonist activity

Rats trained to discriminate the mixed mu agonist/kappa antagonist buprenorphine from its vehicle generalize buprenorphine control to morphine. Buprenorphine, however, does not generalize to MR2266. The generalization to morphine suggests that buprenorphine's mu agonist properties mediated in part its discriminative control. The failure to generalize to MR2266, a compound reported to block kappa-mediated effects, however, suggests that its kappa antagonist activity was not involved in its discriminative effects. The ability of buprenorphine's mu (but not kappa) activity to establish stimulus control may be a function of the overshadowing of the kappa properties of buprenorphine by its concurrent mu activity. To test this possibility, in the present experiment rats were chronically exposed to morphine prior to buprenorphine discrimination training. This procedure has been reported to result in tolerance to buprenorphine's mu agonist effects and a more pronounced display of its kappa antagonist properties. The rats were then tested for the generalization of buprenorphine control to morphine, MR2266, and pentobarbital. As expected, buprenorphine failed to generalize to the nonopioid pentobarbital. Although subjects were tolerant to morphine (as evidenced by reductions in morphine-induced behavioral effects and a rightward shift in the doses of morphine substituting for buprenorphine), buprenorphine still failed to generalize to MR2266. The failure of buprenorphine to generalize to MR2266 under conditions that should have allowed for the development of stimulus control by buprenorphine's kappa antagonist activity was discussed in terms of the general inability of kappa antagonist activity to support discrimination learning.

Receptor binding profile suggests multiple mechanisms of action are responsible for ibogaine's putative anti-addictive activity

The indole alkaloid ibogaine (NIH 10567, Endabuse) is currently being examined for its potential utility in the treatment of cocaine and opioid addiction. However, a clearly defined molecular mechanism of action for ibogaine's putative anti-addictive properties has not been delineated. Radioligand binding assays targeting over 50 distinct neurotransmitter receptors, ion channels, and select second messenger systems were employed to establish a broad in vitro pharmacological profile for ibogaine. These studies revealed that ibogaine interacted with a wide variety of receptors at concentrations of 1-100 microM. These included the mu, delta, kappa, opiate, 5HT2, 5HT3, and muscarinic1 and 2 receptors, and the dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin uptake sites. In addition, ibogaine interacted with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) associated ion and sodium ion channels as determined by the inhibition of [3H]MK-801 and [3H]bactrachotoxin A 20-alpha-benzoate binding (BTX-B), respectively. This broad spectrum of activity may in part be responsible for ibogaine's putative anti-addictive activity.

Drug discrimination using a Pavlovian conditional discrimination paradigm in pigeons

Three pigeons were studied using a discriminated autoshaping procedure in which the presence or absence of methadone served as a conditional stimulus signalling which of two key light CSs would be followed by grain access. Drug sessions alternated randomly with no-drug sessions. Methadone (2.0 mg/kg) was administered prior to drug sessions in which a black vertical line on a white background served as CS+ and a diffuse white keylight served as CS- (reversed for bird 681). Saline or no injection was administered prior to no-drug sessions and the CS+/CS- contingencies were reversed. Discriminated performances emerged in which over 80% of the responding occurred to the appropriate stimulus. Stimulus control by methadone was assessed by presenting a range of methadone doses during 10-trial extinction sessions. A graded dose-effect curve was produced with low doses of methadone controlling saline-appropriate responding and higher doses controlling drug-appropriate responding. A range of doses of morphine, cocaine, and pentobarbital were also tested. Morphine produced methadone-appropriate responding while cocaine and pentobarbital did not.

Nalorphine as a stimulus in drug discrimination learning: assessment of the role of mu- and kappa-receptor subtypes

Using the conditioned taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning, animals were trained to discriminate nalorphine from distilled water. In subsequent generalization tests, the mu-opiate agonist morphine substituted for the nalorphine stimulus in a dose-dependent manner, while the kappa-opiate agonist U50,488H and the mu-opiate antagonists naloxone and naltrexone failed to do so. That the mu-agonist morphine substituted for the nalorphine stimulus while a kappa-agonist and mu-antagonists failed to substitute indicate that the discriminative control that was established with nalorphine in the present study was mu-agonist receptor-mediated. The basis for this selective control by the mu-receptor subtype may be related to the relative salience of receptor activity in opiate-naive animals. The present results suggest that discriminative control by compounds with activity at multiple receptor sites is not uniformly mediated by specific activity at all of those sites. The specific site mediating discriminative control appears to be a function of the specific training drug.

Endogenous opiates: 1993

This paper is the sixteenth installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It is restricted to papers published during 1993 that concern the behavioral effects of the endogenous opiate peptides, and does not include papers dealing only with their analgesic properties. The specific topics this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.