Cross-reactivity between latex and banana

Sensitization to latex and food allergens in atopic dermatitis patients according to ALEX2 Allergy Xplorer test

Aim of our study is to analyse the sensitisation profile to molecular components of latex and of food allergens with the use of ALEX2 Allergy Xplorer test and to compare these results with the anamnestical data after latex exposure and with the anamnestical data after exposure to food allergens in atopic dermatitis patients.

METHODS

100 patients were included in the study (49 men and 51 women with the average age 40.6 years). The specific IgE was examined with the use of ALEX2 Allergy Xplorer test. A detailed personal history of allergic reaction to latex and allergic reaction to food allergens was taken in all included patients.

RESULTS

The sensitisation to latex was recorded in 17 % of patients, majority of patients have positive results of specific IgE to Hev b 8 without clinical reaction to latex. In 7 % of patients with positive results of specific IgE to Hev b 1, Hev b 3, Hev b 5, Hev b 6.02 and Hev b 11 the contact urticaria or contact dermatitis were recorded. The latex fruit syndrome was recorded in 7 % of patients; in another 10 % of patients we recorded no clinical reaction to latex, but the positive results to molecular components of latex and the clinical symptoms after ingestion of different kinds of fruits.

CONCLUSION

The significant relation between the results of specific IgE to molecular components Hev b 3, Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.02 and the clinical reaction to latex was confirmed; these components significantly imply clinical reactivity to latex.

Comprehensive Review on Banana Fruit Allergy: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Management, and Potential Modification of Allergens through Food Processing

The pulp of the banana fruit is rich in bioactive compounds like dietary fibers, low glycemic carbohydrates, natural sugars, vitamins, minerals and antioxidants. These beneficial compounds are responsible for the proper functioning of immune system and enhance prevention against various deadly diseases like cancer, diabetes and heart diseases. Despite having, positive effects, the fruit are recognized as an important source for causing allergy to 0.6% of people in general population and up to 67 and 46% for people with asthma or atopic dermatitis. Fruit allergy is one of the most common food allergies witnessed worldwide. Banana fruit allergy results from the abnormal immune response to the banana proteins soon after its consumption. Symptoms range from oral allergy syndrome (OAS) to the life-threatening anaphylaxis. IgE reactivity of banana is associated with different proteins of which six proteins have been identified as major allergens, viz., Mus a1 (Profilin-actin binding protein), Mus a 2 (Class 1 chitinase), Mus a 3 (Nonspecific lipid transfer protein), Mus a 4 (Thaumatin like protein), Mus a 5 (Beta 1,3 glucanase) and Mus a 6 (Ascorbate peroxidase). This review focuses on pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and different food processing methods to mitigate the allergenicity of banana fruit.

Update on latex allergy: New insights into an old problem

Despite the efforts made to mitigate the consequences of this disease, natural rubber latex allergy (NRLA) continues to be a global health problem and is still considered one of the main worries in the working environment in many countries throughout the world. Due to thousands of products containing latex, it is not surprising that the current statistics suggest that prevalence remains high among healthcare workers and susceptible patients. In developed countries, reduction in the prevalence of IgE-mediated allergy to latex proteins from gloves may lead to lax attention by health care personnel. On the other hand, this situation is different in developing countries where there is a lack of epidemiological data associated with a deficit in education and awareness of this issue. The aim of this review is to provide an update of the current knowledge and practical recommendations regarding NRLA by allergologists from different parts of the world with experience in this field.

Association between fruit and vegetable allergies and pollen-food allergy syndrome in Japanese children: a multicenter cross-sectional case series

Background

Recently, the prevalence of food allergies during childhood is increasing, with fruits being common allergens. However, data on allergens that cause fruit and vegetable allergies and pollen-food allergy syndrome (PFAS) in childhood are relatively few. This study aimed to examine the allergens in fruit and vegetable allergies in pediatric patients and to determine the association between fruit and vegetable allergies and PFAS.

Objective

This study aimed to examine the current status of fruit and vegetable allergies in Japanese children.

Methods

This was a multicenter case series observational study. The participants included children aged <15 years who developed allergic symptoms after eating fruits and vegetables and subsequently received treatment in the Pediatric Department of 6 hospitals in the Osaka Prefecture in Japan during the study period from August 2016 to July 2017. Participants' information was obtained using a questionnaire, and data were obtained by performing several types of allergy tests using blood samples.

Results

A total of 97 children (median age, 9 years; 56 males) were included in the study. Apple was the most common allergen, followed by peach, kiwi, cantaloupe, and watermelon. A total of 74 participants (76%) exhibited allergic symptoms due to PFAS; moreover, pathogenesis-related protein-10 (PR-10) was the most common allergen superfamily. On the contrary, in the group where neither PR-10 nor profilin was sensitized, kiwi and banana were the most common allergens, and the age of onset was lower than that in the PFAS group. Specific antibody titer was significantly associated with Birch for Bet v1 and latex for Bet v2 (r = 0.99 and r = 0.89).

Conclusion

When we examine patients with fruit and vegetable allergies, we should first consider PFAS even in childhood specifically for children greater than 4 years old.

Impact of Converting to Powder-Free Gloves: Decreasing the Symptoms of Latex Exposure in Operating Room Personnel

This study examined health care worker satisfaction with the use of non-powdered natural rubber latex (NRL) surgical gloves to determine the impact of non-powdered NRL gloves on the NRL sensitization of operating room personnel. The study used a 1-year longitudinal design to obtain recall information from employees about their NRL exposure. Additionally, a survey was completed by participants related to their satisfaction with non-powdered NRL gloves. Informed consent was obtained from 103 employees. After conversion to an operating room using non-powdered NRL, there was a significant decrease in reported symptoms with NRL exposure (42% pre- and 29% post-conversion, Fisher's exact, two-tailed, p = .0001). This study demonstrated that the conversion to non-powdered low-protein NRL gloves resulted in decreased symptoms because of NRL exposure.

EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide

The availability of allergen molecules ('components') from several protein families has advanced our understanding of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated responses and enabled 'component-resolved diagnosis' (CRD). The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Molecular Allergology User's Guide (MAUG) provides comprehensive information on important allergens and describes the diagnostic options using CRD. Part A of the EAACI MAUG introduces allergen molecules, families, composition of extracts, databases, and diagnostic IgE, skin, and basophil tests. Singleplex and multiplex IgE assays with components improve both sensitivity for low-abundance allergens and analytical specificity; IgE to individual allergens can yield information on clinical risks and distinguish cross-reactivity from true primary sensitization. Part B discusses the clinical and molecular aspects of IgE-mediated allergies to foods (including nuts, seeds, legumes, fruits, vegetables, cereal grains, milk, egg, meat, fish, and shellfish), inhalants (pollen, mold spores, mites, and animal dander), and Hymenoptera venom. Diagnostic algorithms and short case histories provide useful information for the clinical workup of allergic individuals targeted for CRD. Part C covers protein families containing ubiquitous, highly cross-reactive panallergens from plant (lipid transfer proteins, polcalcins, PR-10, profilins) and animal sources (lipocalins, parvalbumins, serum albumins, tropomyosins) and explains their diagnostic and clinical utility. Part D lists 100 important allergen molecules. In conclusion, IgE-mediated reactions and allergic diseases, including allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, food reactions, and insect sting reactions, are discussed from a novel molecular perspective. The EAACI MAUG documents the rapid progression of molecular allergology from basic research to its integration into clinical practice, a quantum leap in the management of allergic patients.

Novel allergens from ancient foods: Man e 5 from manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) cross reacts with Hev b 5 from latex

SCOPE

Manioc (Manihot esculenta) is a tuber mainly consumed in the Southern Hemisphere and used worldwide by food and chemistry industry. We aimed to recombinantly produce and characterize the first manioc allergen and evaluate its IgE reactivity in sera of Brazilian and Italian patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The molecule, termed Man e5, was expressed in E. coli, characterized by amino acid analysis, mass spectrometry, circular dichroism, HPLC, and dynamic light scattering. A tertiary structural model of the protein was produced using bioinformatics and susceptibility to pepsin digestion was analyzed in vitro. Based on its high content of charged residues, heat stability, flexibility and lack of secondary structure elements, the allergen was determined a member of the intrinsically disordered protein family. Brazilian patients were selected based on manioc allergy and Italians based on latex allergy and sensitization to Hev b 5.71% of Brazilians and 40% of Italians were in vitro IgE positive to Man e5. Cross-inhibition assays suggest a possible involvement of this allergen in the latex-fruit syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Man e5, the first purified allergen from manioc demonstrates IgE cross-reactivity with Hev b 5. Data suggest Hev b 5 might act as primary sensitizer and could therefore lead to allergic manifestations upon manioc consumption without prior exposition.

Referrals to a regional allergy clinic - an eleven year audit

Background

Allergy is a serious and apparently increasing public health problem yet relatively little is known about the types of allergy seen in routine tertiary practice, including their spatial distribution, co-occurrence or referral patterns. This study reviewed referrals over an eleven year period to a regional allergy clinic that had a well defined geographical boundary. For those patients confirmed as having an allergy we explored: (i) differences over time and by demographics, (ii) types of allergy, (iii) co-occurrence, and (iv) spatial distributions.

Methods

Data were extracted from consultant letters to GPs, from September 1998 to September 2009, for patients confirmed as having an allergy. Other data included referral statistics and population data by postcode. Simple descriptive analysis was used to describe types of allergy. We calculated 11 year standardised morbidity ratios for postcode districts and checked for spatial clustering. We present maps showing 11 year rates by postcode, and 'difference' maps which try to separate referral effect from possible environmental effect.

Results

Of 5778 referrals, 961 patients were diagnosed with an allergy. These were referred by a total of 672 different GPs. There were marked differences in referral patterns between GP practices and also individual GPs. The mean age of patients was 35 and there were considerably more females (65%) than males. Airborne allergies were the most frequent (623), and there were very high rates of co-occurrence of pollen, house dust mite, and animal hair allergies. Less than half (410) patients had a food allergy, with nuts, fruit, and seafood being the most common allergens. Fifteen percent (142) had both a food and a non-food allergy. Certain food allergies were more likely to co-occur, for example, patients allergic to dairy products were more likely to be allergic to egg.

There were age differences by types of allergy; people referred with food allergies were on average 5 years younger than those with other allergies, and those allergic to nuts were much younger (26 Vs 38) than those with other food allergies.

There was clear evidence for spatial clustering with marked clustering around the referral hospital. However, the geographical distribution varied between allergies; airborne (particularly pollen allergies) clustered in North Dartmoor and Exmoor, food allergies (particularly nut allergies) in the South Hams, and on small numbers, some indication of seafood allergy in the far south west of Cornwall and in the Padstow area.

Conclusions

This study shows marked geographical differences in allergy referrals which are likely to reflect a combination of environmental factors and GP referral patterns. The data suggest that GPs may benefit from education and ongoing decision support and be supported by public education on the nature of allergy. It suggests further research into what happens to patients with allergy where there has been low use of tertiary services and further research into cross-reactivity and co-occurrence, and spatial distribution of allergy.

Mapping of IgE-binding epitopes on the major latex allergen Hev b 2 and the cross-reacting 1,3beta-glucanase fruit allergens as a molecular basis for the latex-fruit syndrome

Nine distinct IgE-binding epitopes were identified along the entire amino acid sequence of the major latex allergen Hev b 2 (1,3beta-glucanase) using a set of synthetic 15-mer peptides frameshifted by 3 residues immobilized on cellulose membrane (Spot technique). Most of the amino acid residues building these IgE-binding epitopic regions are nicely exposed on the surface and the epitopes usually correspond to charged regions on the molecular surface of the protein. A smaller number of 5 IgE-binding epitopic areas was identified on the banana 1,3beta-glucanase, which exhibits a very similar overall conformation and charge distribution. The latter epitopes might be responsible for the IgE-binding cross-reactivity currently observed in the latex-fruit syndrome. Using rabbit polyclonal IgG anti-BanGluc as a probe instead of IgE from allergic patients the same epitopic regions were identified in both Hev b 2 and BanGluc. Additionally, surface-exposed regions with a very close conformation were predicted to occur on Ole e 9, the 1,3beta-glucanase allergen identified in olive pollen.

Frequency in allergy to proteins of latex in health care workers

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate allergy prevalence to latex proteins in health care workers at the Laboratory and Surgery Room of Hospital CIMA Chihuahua.

METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS

A thorough clinical chart was recorded for all health care workers studied: hematic biometry, total IgE by ELISA method, specific IgE to latex antigen by ELISA (pharmacy CAP system), cutaneous tests with latex antigen (Aphi de México, Hevea Brasiliensis Biopal Inc. Spoken WA), through scarification, together with histamine and Evans (positive-negative control). The number included is 99 individuals. Specific IgE to latex in 4 cases was positive (4%) and in the cutaneous tests to latex, 24 cases (24%) resulted positive.

CONCLUSIONS

The study reports a prevalence of (4%) when performing the specific IgE to latex and (24%) to the cutaneous test with antigen to total latex. This data allows us to continue evaluating the personnel at risk at the hospital, with better results in the administration of Labor Medicine at this medical institution.

[Latex allergy]

Latex allergy has become an increasing cause of morbility in the last few years and is now recognized as an international health problem. The prevalence of latex sensitization among the general population is less than 1 %. The groups at highest risk include healthcare workers, rubber industry workers, patients with a history of multiple surgical procedures, particularly children with spina bifida and urogenital abnormalities, atopic individuals, and patients with certain fruit allergies (especially kiwi, avocado, chestnut and banana). The molecular and immunological characteristics of several natural latex allergens have been identified. Symptoms range from contact urticaria to anaphylaxis. Diagnosis is based on clinical history and is confirmed by skin prick tests. Measurement of serum specific IgE to latex can also be useful. The best treatment is latex avoidance and substitution by other materials. However, because latex products are ubiquitous in medical and nonmedical devices of daily use, a latex-free environment is not easy to achieve. In some patients, immunotherapy could be an alternative.

Characterization of cross-reactive bell pepper allergens involved in the latex-fruit syndrome

BACKGROUND

Between 30% and 50% of individuals who are allergic to latex products are also allergic to specific plant foods, a fact that is well documented as the latex-fruit syndrome. Simultaneous sensitization to latex and bell pepper has been previously reported. Although bell pepper fruits are frequently consumed raw, cooked or as a spice, little is known about the cross-reactive allergens.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we wished to identify bell pepper allergens involved in the latex-fruit syndrome.

METHODS

Sera of four patients who displayed clinical symptoms to latex and bell pepper were used in immunoblot studies on protein extracts of three different cultivars of fresh bell pepper and fresh Hevea latex. Cross-reactive allergens were identified by inhibition experiments using recombinant Hev b 8 (latex profilin), and natural Hev b 2 (latex beta-1,3-glucanase) in addition to the protein extracts. A novel cross-reactive IgE-reactive 30 kDa protein was subjected to sequence analysis.

RESULTS

Three patients displayed IgE to profilins from bell pepper fruits and latex. Two patients possessed IgE to Hev b 2, a latex beta-1,3-glucanase, and a homologous protein in bell pepper. One patient possessed IgE reactive with a protein of 30 kDa identified by N-terminal sequencing as an l-ascorbate peroxidase and another patient to a protein of 38 kDa. Additionally, IgE binding proteins in two higher molecular weight ranges showed cross-reactive capacities.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show on the molecular level that bell pepper is part of the latex-fruit syndrome. For the first time we have identified the major latex allergen Hev b 2, a beta-1,3-glucanase, and the bell pepper l-ascorbate peroxidase as cross-reactive allergens. We were also able to show that profilins are responsible for some of the IgE cross-reactivity.

Kiwi fruit allergy: a review

Allergy to kiwi fruit was first described in 1981, and there have since been reports of the allergy presenting with a wide range of symptoms from localized oral allergy syndrome (OAS) to life-threatening anaphylaxis. The article reviews the available information concerning the clinical features of kiwi fruit allergy and the role of clinical investigations for diagnosis. Work identifying the major allergens in kiwi fruit has resulted in conflicting results, the possible reasons for which are discussed. The clinical associations of kiwi fruit allergy with allergies to pollens or latex are reviewed.

Clinical value and measurement of specific IgE

The diagnosis of human allergic diseases involves the combined use of a careful clinical history, physical examination, and in vitro and in vivo assay methods for the detection of IgE antibodies of defined allergen specificities. In vivo (skin testing) and in vitro (measurement of specific IgE in serum) techniques cannot be considered interchangeable, the former reflecting not only the presence of IgE but also mast cell integrity, vascular and neural responsiveness. Both techniques have similarities and differences, advantages and disadvantages. Recently introduced "second generation" immunoassays have continued to improve the analytical sensitivity and reproducibility thanks to automation and improved reagent quality. Quantitative assays may allow the use of specific clinical thresholds able to differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic patients. False-negative and false-positive results should derive from lability of some major extracts, and from possible cross-reactivities, respectively. Characterization of allergens at a molecular and submolecular level and, where necessary, the use of recombinant allergens can reduce cross-reactions and further improve the quality of immunoassays.

[Latex allergy in children]

The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of latex allergy and the clinical features of children with latex allergy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively investigated 243 children consulting in our allergy out-patients unit during 1 year. Parents answered a questionnaire, and children underwent skin prick tests with common allergens and latex. Latex-specific serum immunoglobulin E was determined by CAP test in children with latex sensitization. The results were compared in children with and without latex allergy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of latex allergy was 1.3%. A family history of atopy (75%) and a personal history of previous surgery was associated with latex allergy (P < 0.0001). In children with latex allergy, the frequency of sensitization to inhaled and food allergens, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis and conjunctivitis was higher than in children without latex allergy (P < 0.05). Avocado allergy was the food allergy most commonly associated with clinical symptoms. Balloon was the most common latex product causing symptoms (60%).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its potential severe consequences, latex allergy should be investigated in children who had undergone multiple surgical procedures and in the children with pollen-food allergy syndrome. Avoidance of latex is an important preventive measure.

Latex-fruit syndrome

Natural rubber latex immunoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity is probably one of the most relevant challenges that has been faced in the treatment of allergies during recent years. Additionally, allergen cross-reactivity has arisen as another very important problem, in the difficulty in diagnosing it and in its clinical implications. It is clear that some latex allergens cross-react with plant-derived food allergens, the so-called latex-fruit syndrome, with evident clinical consequences. Although the foods most frequently involved are banana, avocado, kiwi, and chestnut, several others are also implicated. Investigations point to a group of defense-related plant proteins, class I chitinases, which cross-react with a major latex allergen, hevein, as the panallergens responsible for the syndrome. This review focuses on our current understanding of the latex-fruit syndrome.

A history of latex allergy

Archaeologists have found that latex items were used as early as 1600 BC, but it took until approximately 1900 AD before surgical gloves were commonly used. Descriptions of apparent allergic reactions to natural rubber appeared in the medical literature in 1927, and irritant and delayed-contact reactions were reported in 1933. Although irritant and delayed-contact reactions to rubber products were increasingly recognized, immediate-type allergic reactions were not reported again until 1979. However, after 1980, increasing numbers of contact urticarial reactions to latex were reported, and investigations suggested that many of these reactions were IgE-mediated. In 1984, the first anaphylactic reactions caused by latex surgical gloves were reported, followed in 1991 by the first report of a fatal anaphylactic reaction to latex. Increasing recognition of latex allergy led to divergent paths of investigation. Critical early questions were whether the observed reactions were truly IgE-mediated, and if they were IgE-mediated, what was the source of the allergen? If the allergen was present in latex products, where did it come from? Was it present in raw latex or was it added during processing? As knowledge about the allergens improved, efforts were made to develop and test materials for skin testing and for allergen-specific IgE assays. Now more than 10 unique proteins are recognized as major latex allergens. Although much has been learned about latex allergy, important unanswered questions remain, including the sources of latex exposure that led to sensitization, why latex allergy increased dramatically during the 1980s, and the prevalence of latex allergy in diverse populations. This review concentrates on the history of latex use in medicine and the dramatic emergence of immediate-type latex allergy.

[Latex-fruit syndrome]

During the last decade, latex IgE-mediated allergy has been recognized as a very important medical problem. At the same time, many studies have dealt with allergic cross-reactions between aeroallergens and foods. In this context, there is clear evidence now on the existence of significant clinical association between latex and fruit allergies. Therefore, a latex-fruit syndrome has been postulated.Several studies have demonstrated that from 20% to 60% of latex-allergic patients show IgE-mediated reactions to a wide variety of foods, mainly fruits. Although implicated foods vary among the studies, banana, avocado, chestnut and kiwi are the most frequently involved. Clinical manifestations of these reactions may vary from oral allergy syndrome to severe anaphylactic reactions, which are not uncommon, thus remarking the clinical relevance of this syndrome.The diagnosis of food hypersensitivities associated to latex allergy is based on the clinical history of immediate adverse reactions, suggestive of an IgE-mediated sensitivity. Prick by prick test with the fresh foods implicated in the reactions shows an 80% concordance with the clinical diagnosis, and therefore it seems to be the best diagnostic test available nowadays in order to confirm the suspicion of latex-fruit allergy. Once the diagnosis is achieved, a diet free of the offending fruits is mandatory.Recently, some of the common allergens responsible for the cross-reactions among latex and the fruits most commonly implicated in the syndrome have been identified. Class I chitinases, with an N-terminal hevein like domain, which cross-react with the major latex allergen hevein, seem to be the panallergens responsible for the latex-fruit syndrome.

Latex allergy: prevalence, risk factors, and cross-reactivity

There are few little exact epidemiological data on the prevalence and incidence of latex allergy, partly because the diagnostic tools are unsatisfactory and partly because the epidemiological study planning often does not fulfill criteria of good praxis. On the basis of present data, latex allergy in normal population is low, under 1%. Known risk groups such as health care workers, atopic subjects, people with hand dermatitis, and especially spina bifida patients show higher prevalence numbers. The common serological cross-reactivity between latex and a great number of different fruits and vegetables is bound to common plant pathogenesis-related proteins and storage proteins. Despite positive serological tests, only about half of NRL-allergic subjects have clinical symptoms after eating cross-reacting foods.

Current understanding of food allergens

Food allergies are IgE-mediated immunological reactions; this distinguishes them from other adverse reactions to foods. Most (>90%) of the recognized food allergies are generally thought to be caused by eight foods or food groups. A number of factors can affect food allergy development, including diet and culture, route of exposure, processing, cooking, and digestion. In addition, it is thought that the properties of certain food proteins render them more likely to be allergenic than other proteins. Most food allergens are major proteins, polyvalent molecules with at least two or more IgE-binding sites, and are recognized as foreign molecules (hence immunogenic). A number of major food allergens have been recently characterized, and amino acid sequences determined. Tropomyosin is the only major allergen of shrimp. A number of IgE-binding epitopes have been identified in this molecule, though they may vary from one shrimp-allergic individual to another. Single amino acid substitutions within epitopes based on that of homologous, nonreactive tropomyosins can substantially enhance or abolish IgE antibody binding. Using the accumulated knowledge of food allergen protein structure, the allergenicity of novel proteins to which there has been no prior human exposure has been assessed. This has been based primarily on the lability or resistance of a protein to enzymatic degradation. Clearly, further criteria must be developed to refine this process. In this regard, the development of animal models that have been sufficiently validated as surrogates of human IgE antibody responses is needed for more precise assessment of the allergenic potential of proteins.

Latex allergy: historical perspective

The widespread use of powdered latex gloves, following the institution of universal precautions in 1987, increased the occurrence of a host of adverse reactions to natural rubber latex (NRL). Although the most common reactions are irritant or allergic dermatitis reactions to manufacturing chemicals, a spectrum of type I IgE-mediated reactions to NRL proteins are of great concern. IgE-mediated reactions range from contact urticaria to occupational asthma and anaphylaxis, resulting in significant morbidity and potential mortality. At-risk populations include highly exposed groups like health care workers and certain patient groups requiring extensive medical treatment. A significant complicating factor is the association with clinically significant adverse reactions to certain foods because of allergen cross-reactivity. Institution of policies to use only low-protein, powder-free gloves, has resulted in a dramatic reduction of visits to occupational health departments and workmen's compensation claims due to occupational asthma.

IGE-mediated natural rubber latex allergy: an update

In the past 2 decades, IgE-mediated NRL allergy has become a well-defined condition with recognised risk groups, established diagnostic tools, and adequate prevention strategies (1-3). Furthermore, molecular biology and biochemical techniques have significantly improved our knowledge of the proteins responsible to cause the disease. Clinical manifestations will not be addressed in this review, nor will broad preventive strategies be proposed; these have been discussed elsewhere (4, 5). After a brief introduction this review will focus on specific issues: (1) How do we estimate the prevalence of NRL allergy and who is at risk for clinical sensitisation? (2) What specific allergens cause NRL allergy? How does sensitisation for these allergens occur? Are all patients sensitised for the same allergens? Threshold allergen exposure levels. (4) What is the latex-fruit syndrome? What is the clinical relevance of a positive plant food specific IgE quantification in patients with NRL allergy? (5) How do we diagnose NRL allergy? What are the strengths and weaknesses of currently available diagnostic tools? (7) How do we manage NRL allergy? What is the role of medication and immunotherapy in the treatment of NRL allergy? How do we select an appropriate non-NRL alternative for NRL gloves? Which regulatory provisions have been implemented?

Cross-reactivity of IgE antibodies to allergens

The cross-reactivity of IgE antibodies is of interest for various reasons, three of which are discussed. Firstly, from the clinical view, it is important to know the patterns of cross-reactivity, because they often (but not always) reflect the pattern of clinical sensitivities. We discuss the cross-reactivities associated with sensitization to pollen and vegetable foods: PR-10 (Bet v 1-related), profilin, the cross-reactive carbohydrate determinant (CCD), the recently described isoflavone reductase, and the (still elusive) mugwort allergen that is associated with celery anaphylaxis; cross-reactivities between allergens from invertebrates, particularly tropomyosin, paramyosin, and glutathione S-transferase (GST); and latex-associated cross-reactivities. Clustering cross-reactive allergens may simplify diagnostic procedures and therapeutic regimens. Secondly, IgE cross-reactivity is of interest for its immunologic basis, particularly in relation to the regulation of allergic sensitization: are IgE antibodies to allergens more often cross-reactive than IgG antibodies to "normal" antigens? If so, why? For this discussion, it is relevant to compare not only the structural relation between the two allergens in question, but also the relatedness to the human equivalent (if any) and how the latter influences the immune repertoire. Thirdly, prediction of IgE cross-reactivity is of interest in relation to allergic reactivity to novel foods. Cross-reactivity is a property defined by individual antibodies to individual allergens. Quantitative information (including relative affinity) is required on cross-reactivity in the allergic population and with specific allergens (rather than with whole extracts). Such information is still scarce, but with the increasing availability of purified (usually recombinant) allergens, such quantitative information will soon start to accumulate. It is expected that similarity in short stretches of the linear amino-acid sequence is unlikely to result in relevant cross-reactivity between two proteins unless there is similarity in the protein fold.

Analysis of Asn-linked glycans from vegetable foodstuffs: widespread occurrence of Lewis a, core 1,3-linked fucose and xylose substitutions

The N-glycans from 27 "plant" foodstuffs, including one from a gymnospermic plant and one from a fungus, were prepared by a new procedure and examined by means of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). For several samples, glycan structures were additionally investigated by size-fractionation and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography in conjunction with exoglycosidase digests and finally also (1)H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The glycans found ranged from the typical vacuolar "horseradish peroxidase" type and oligomannose to complex Le(a)-carrying structures. Though the common mushroom exclusively contained N-glycans of the oligomannosidic type, all plant foods contained mixtures of the above-mentioned types. Apple, asparagus, avocado, banana, carrot, celery, hazelnut, kiwi, onion, orange, pear, pignoli, strawberry, and walnut were particularly rich in Le(a)-carrying N-glycans. Although traces of Le(a)-containing structures were also present in almond, pistachio, potato, and tomato, no such glycans could be found in cauliflower. Coconut exhibited almost exclusively N-glycans containing only xylose but no fucose. Oligomannosidic N-glycans dominated in buckwheat and especially in the legume seeds mung bean, pea, peanut, and soybean. Papaya presented a unique set of hybrid type structures partially containing the Le(a) determinant. These results are not only compatible with the hypothesis that the carbohydrate structures are another potential source of immunological cross-reaction between different plant allergens, but they also demonstrate that the Le(a)-type structure is very widespread among plants.

Randomized, double-blind, crossover challenge study in 53 subjects reporting adverse reactions to melon (Cucumis melo)

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to melon with details of clinical reactions confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges (DBPCFCs).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate clinical features (type and severity of reactions, age at onset, results of skin prick and in vitro tests, and incidence of other allergic diseases and associated food allergies) of acute allergic reactions to melon confirmed by DBPCFCs.

METHODS

Fifty-three consecutive adult patients complaining of adverse reactions to melon were included in the study. Skin prick tests and detection of specific IgE were performed in all patients with melon, avocado, kiwi, banana, chestnut, latex, pollen, and other offending foods. Patients first underwent an open food challenge, unless they had a convincing history of severe anaphylaxis. Positive open food challenge reactions were subsequently evaluated by DBPCFCs.

RESULTS

Actual clinical reactivity was confirmed in 19 (36%) of 53 patients. The most frequent symptom was oral allergy syndrome (n = 14), but two patients experienced life-threatening reactions, including respiratory symptoms and hypotension. The positive predictive value for a skin prick test was 42%, and that for specific IgE measurement was 44%. Forty-five reactions to 15 other foods were confirmed in 18 patients. The most common foods associated with melon allergy were avocado (n = 7), banana (n = 7), kiwi (n = 6), watermelon (n = 6), and peach (n = 5). Onset of melon-induced allergic symptoms occurred from 6 to 45 years (median, 20 years), preceded by seasonal rhinitis, asthma, or both in 88% (15/17).

CONCLUSION

About one third of reported reactions to melon are confirmed by means of DBPCFC, which has been proven to be the most reliable procedure in the diagnosis of clinical fruit allergy. Isolated melon allergy is rare, with most patients either having allergic rhinitis, asthma, or both and associated food allergies.

The latex and food allergy connection

Natural rubber latex is used in the manufacture of many products in the United States. As natural rubber latex allergy becomes of increasing concern, dietitians need to have an understanding of this allergy and how it relates to workplace safety, employee health, and patient feeding and counseling. Natural rubber latex contains more than 35 proteins that may be related to Type I, Ig-E-mediated allergy in numerous segments of the population, including health care workers and patients. Many foods, especially chestnut, banana, and avocado, have the potential to cross-react with natural rubber latex. Chitinase enzymes, related to plant defense, are believed to be involved in this cross-reaction. A strong connection between food allergy and natural rubber latex allergy is recognized and described in this review.

Specific immunotherapy with a standardized latex extract versus placebo in allergic healthcare workers

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of allergy to natural rubber latex proteins has increased over recent years among healthcare professionals but also in children undergoing multiple operations. Exposure to the antigen mainly occurs through the respiratory mucosa and the percutaneous route. Clinical manifestations range from urticaria to angioedema, rhinoconjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, or anaphylactic shock. Preventive measures have been proposed to reduce the risk of sensitization by using only powder-free or synthetic gloves and latex-free material in operating units, but this is not always possible.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy in sensitized workers.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with latex skin allergy and rhinitis (9 of whom also had asthma) were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (9 in the active group and 8 in the placebo group) for 1 year. Treatment started with a 2-day course of rush immunotherapy in hospital. Treatment efficacy was assessed after 6 and 12 months by means of symptom and medication scores recorded on diary cards. Conjunctival provocation tests were also performed.

RESULTS

Patients in the active treatment group had a significantly lower total rhinitis score after 6 (P <. 04) and 12 months (P <.05), conjunctivitis score after 6 months (P <. 02), and cutaneous score after 12 months (P <.03) than in the placebo group. Asthma symptoms after 6 or 12 months of treatment were not significantly different between the two groups after adjustment for baseline values. The global medication score was markedly decreased in the latex-treated group. A significant difference in conjunctival reactivity was observed in favor of the active group: the number of patients for whom the threshold dose was increased after 12 months of treatment was significantly greater in the active group than in the placebo group (P <.02). Most injections were well tolerated, but several adverse effects, including hypotension, urticaria, wheezing, and pharyngeal edema, were observed.

CONCLUSION

The clinical benefits observed during the present study included a significant improvement of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and cutaneous symptoms. Immunotherapy also decreased allergen-specific conjunctival reactivity. Latex-specific immunotherapy may allow sensitized personnel to remain at work, but further trials need to be conducted in a larger number of patients.

Latex allergy

Latex allergy continues to be an important medical problem. In this review we re-examine the definition of latex allergy, the offending allergens, the factors that enhance sensitization, the threshold levels that sensitize and elicit reactions in sensitized individuals, current diagnostic techniques, avoidance measures, the barrier properties of nonlatex alternatives, and the roles of premedication and immunotherapy. Twenty years after its resurgence, latex allergy is a well-defined condition with established diagnostic criteria and rational treatment and prevention strategies. However, in spite of advances associated with molecular studies of latex allergens and improved understanding of immunotherapy, avoidance remains the only effective treatment.

Class I chitinases as potential panallergens involved in the latex-fruit syndrome

BACKGROUND

Latex-fruit cross-sensitization has been fully demonstrated. However, the antigens responsible for this "latex-fruit syndrome" have not been identified. We have recently shown that class I chitinases are relevant chestnut and avocado allergens.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the in vivo and in vitro reactions of purified chestnut and avocado chitinases in relation to the latex-fruit syndrome.

METHODS

From a latex-allergic population, eighteen patients allergic to chestnut, avocado, or both were selected. Skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed with crude chestnut and avocado extracts, chitinase-enriched preparations, and purified class I and II chitinases from both fruits. CAP-inhibition assays with the crude extracts and purified proteins were carried out. Immunodetection with sera from patients with latex-fruit allergy and immunoblot inhibition tests with a latex extract were also performed. Eighteen subjects paired with our patients and 15 patients allergic to latex but not food were used as control groups.

RESULTS

The chestnut class I chitinase elicited positive SPT responses in 13 of 18 patients with latex-fruit allergy (72%), and the avocado class I chitinase elicited positive responses in 12 of 18 (67%) similarly allergic patients. By contrast, class II enzymes without a hevein-like domain did not show SPT responses in the same patient group. Each isolated class I chitinase reached inhibition values higher than 85% in CAP inhibition assays against the corresponding food extract in solid phase. Immunodetection of the crude extracts and the purified class I chitinases revealed a single 32-kd band for both chestnut and avocado. Preincubation with a natural latex extract fully inhibited the IgE binding to the crude extracts, as well as to the purified chestnut and avocado class I chitinases.

CONCLUSION

Chestnut and avocado class I chitinases with an N-terminal hevein-like domain are major allergens that cross-react with latex. Therefore they are probably the panallergens responsible for the latex-fruit syndrome.

Latex: a cause of allergic contact eczema in users of natural rubber gloves

BACKGROUND

Latex is a common cause of contact urticaria in glove users. We recently found that 1.2% of patients attending a contact dermatitis investigation unit had delayed type hypersensitivity to latex as a cause of eczema.

OBJECTIVE

We reassessed the relevant contact allergens in users of natural rubber gloves with hand dermatitis. Particular emphasis was placed on allergens not included in the standard patch test series.

METHODS

Consecutive natural rubber glove users with hand dermatitis were investigated for the presence of contact dermatitis and urticaria.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen consecutive patients were tested. The American standard series missed 34% and the European 40% of patients with positive patch test reactions to rubber related chemicals. Six percent of patients (20% of those with a positive reaction) demonstrated delayed type hypersensitivity to latex, often in the absence of other relevant contact allergens and contact urticaria to latex.

CONCLUSION

Latex is a relatively common cause of allergic contact eczema in the absence of contact urticaria. Latex should be included in a rubber series for screening patients with hand dermatitis who are glove users.

Latex allergy

Coined the next major health concern of the decade, allergy to natural rubber latex affects people routinely exposed to rubber products. Groups at highest risk include health care workers, rubber industry workers, and persons who have undergone multiple surgical procedures, especially those with spina bifida. Allergy to latex is a type I, immediate, IgE-mediated reaction, which can lead to anaphylaxis and death. Much of latex research is published in allergy journals. Dermatologists may not be aware of the prevalence, symptoms, risks, diagnosis, and treatment of latex allergy. These topics are the subject of this review. Research concerning antigenic proteins, as well as sources of latex alternatives, is also summarized. (J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39:1-24.)

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should have a clear understanding of the history, biology, epidemiology, mechanism, clinical characteristics, diagnostic work-up, and treatment of latex allergy. Readers should also have a greater understanding of multiple potential allergenic latex proteins and their importance in preventing future latex-sensitization.

Latex allergy in fruit-allergic patients

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of latex allergy in fruit-allergic patients, and to assess its clinical significance. Fifty-seven fruit-allergic patients and 50 non-fruit-allergic atopic patient controls were studied. All patients were questioned about conventional immediate symptoms after contact with latex products. Patients also underwent skin prick testing and determination of specific serum IgE to latex, as well as a screening test for environmental allergens. Immunologic latex sensitization occurred in 49/57 (85.9%) fruit-allergic patients, who showed a positive STP and/or CAP to latex, but in only two controls (P < 0.001). Six out of 57 (10.5%) fruit-allergic patients suffered from clinically relevant latex allergy. Symptoms included contact urticaria, angioedema, conjunctivitis, generalized urticaria, and moderate anaphylactic reactions. No control reported symptoms with latex products (P = 0.052). In all patients, clinical symptoms to fruits preceded a history of latex allergy. The fruits most associated were melon, peach, and banana. From our data, we conclude that there is a potential for allergic reactions to latex in patients with allergy to fruit. All patients with fruit allergy should be screened for individual risk of latex allergy.