Dual control for transcription of the galactose operon by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein at two interspersed promoters

The S. Typhi leuO gene contains multiple functional promoters

The S. Typhi leuO gene, which codes for the LysR-type transcriptional regulator LeuO, contains five forward promoters named P3, P1, P2, P5 and P4, and two reverse promoters, P6 and P7. The activity of the forward promoters was revealed by primer extension using gene reporter fusions in an S. Typhi hns lrp mutant strain. Likewise, the activity of the reverse promoters was revealed in an hns background. Derepression of the transcription of the chromosomal gene was confirmed by RT-PCR in the hns lrp mutant. The leuOP1 transcriptional reporter fusion, which contained only the major P1 promoter, had a lower expression in a relA spoT mutant strain, indicating that the steady-state levels of the (p)ppGpp alarmone positively regulate it. In contrast, the leuOP3, leuOP5P4, leuOP6 and leuOP7 transcriptional fusions were derepressed in the relA spoT background, indicating that the alarmone has a negative effect on their expression. Thus, the search for genetic regulators and environmental cues that would differentially derepress leuO gene expression by antagonizing the action of the H-NS and Lrp nucleoid-associated proteins, or that would fine-tune the expression of the various promoters, will further our understanding of the significance that multiple promoters have in the control of LeuO expression.

Genome-Wide Transcriptional Regulation and Chromosome Structural Arrangement by GalR in E. coli

The regulatory protein, GalR, is known for controlling transcription of genes related to D-galactose metabolism in Escherichia coli. Here, using a combination of experimental and bioinformatic approaches, we identify novel GalR binding sites upstream of several genes whose function is not directly related to D-galactose metabolism. Moreover, we do not observe regulation of these genes by GalR under standard growth conditions. Thus, our data indicate a broader regulatory role for GalR, and suggest that regulation by GalR is modulated by other factors. Surprisingly, we detect regulation of 158 transcripts by GalR, with few regulated genes being associated with a nearby GalR binding site. Based on our earlier observation of long-range interactions between distally bound GalR dimers, we propose that GalR indirectly regulates the transcription of many genes by inducing large-scale restructuring of the chromosome.

Molecular Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation at gal Promoters and their Multi-Level Regulation by GalR, CRP and DNA Loop

Studying the regulation of transcription of the gal operon that encodes the amphibolic pathway of d-galactose metabolism in Escherichia coli discerned a plethora of principles that operate in prokaryotic gene regulatory processes. In this chapter, we have reviewed some of the more recent findings in gal that continues to reveal unexpected but important mechanistic details. Since the operon is transcribed from two overlapping promoters, P1 and P2, regulated by common regulatory factors, each genetic or biochemical experiment allowed simultaneous discernment of two promoters. Recent studies range from genetic, biochemical through biophysical experiments providing explanations at physiological, mechanistic and single molecule levels. The salient observations highlighted here are: the axiom of determining transcription start points, discovery of a new promoter element different from the known ones that influences promoter strength, occurrence of an intrinsic DNA sequence element that overrides the transcription elongation pause created by a DNA-bound protein roadblock, first observation of a DNA loop and determination its trajectory, and piggybacking proteins and delivering to their DNA target.

Differential role of base pairs on gal promoters strength

Sequence alignments of promoters in prokaryotes postulated that the frequency of occurrence of a base pair at a given position of promoter elements reflects its contribution to intrinsic promoter strength. We directly assessed the contribution of the four base pairs in each position in the intrinsic promoter strength by keeping the context constant in Escherichia coli cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) regulated gal promoters by in vitro transcription assays. First, we show that base pair frequency within known consensus elements correlates well with promoter strength. Second, we observe some substitutions upstream of the ex-10 TG motif that are important for promoter function. Although the galP1 and P2 promoters overlap, only three positions where substitutions inactivated both promoters were found. We propose that RNA polymerase binds to the -12T base pair as part of double-stranded DNA while opening base pairs from -11A to +3 to form the single-stranded transcription bubble DNA during isomerization. The cAMP-CRP complex rescued some deleterious substitutions in the promoter region. The base pair roles and their flexibilities reported here for E. coli gal promoters may help construction of synthetic promoters in gene circuitry experiments in which overlapping promoters with differential controls may be warranted.

Transcriptomic analysis reveals new regulatory roles of Clp signaling in secondary metabolite biosynthesis and surface motility in Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11

Lysobacter enzymogenes is a bacterial biological control agent emerging as a new source of antibiotic metabolites, such as heat-stable antifungal factor (HSAF) and the antibacterial factor WAP-8294A2. The regulatory mechanism(s) for antibiotic metabolite biosynthesis remains largely unknown in L. enzymogenes. Clp, a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-receptor-like protein, is shown to function as a global regulator in modulating biocontrol-associated traits in L. enzymogenes. However, the genetic basis of Clp signaling remains unclear. Here, we utilized transcriptome/microarray analysis to determine the Clp regulon in L. enzymogenes. We showed that Clp is a global regulator in gene expression, as the transcription of 775 genes belonging to 19 functional groups was differentially controlled by Clp signaling. Analysis of the Clp regulon detected previously characterized Clp-modulated functions as well as novel loci. These include novel loci involved in antibiotic metabolite biosynthesis and surface motility in L. enzymogenes. We further showed experimentally that Clp signaling played a positive role in regulating the biosynthesis of HSAF and WAP-8294A2, as well as surface motility which is a type-IV-pilus-dependent trait. The regulation by Clp signaling of antibiotic (HSAF and WAP-8294A2) biosynthesis and surface motility was found to be independent. Importantly, we identified a factor Lysobacter acetyltransferase (Lat), a homologue of histone acetyltransferase Hpa2, which was regulated by Clp and involved in HSAF biosynthesis, but not associated with WAP-8294A2 production and surface motility. Overall, our study provided new insights into the regulatory role and molecular mechanism of Clp signaling in L. enzymogenes.

Analysis of activator and repressor functions reveals the requirements for transcriptional control by LuxR, the master regulator of quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi

LuxR-type transcription factors are the master regulators of quorum sensing in vibrios. LuxR proteins are unique members of the TetR superfamily of transcription factors because they activate and repress large regulons of genes. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and nucleotide sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify LuxR binding sites in the Vibrio harveyi genome. Bioinformatics analyses showed that the LuxR consensus binding site at repressed promoters is a symmetric palindrome, whereas at activated promoters it is asymmetric and contains only half of the palindrome. Using a genetic screen, we isolated LuxR mutants that separated activation and repression functions at representative promoters. These LuxR mutants exhibit sequence-specific DNA binding defects that restrict activation or repression activity to subsets of target promoters. Altering the LuxR DNA binding site sequence to one more closely resembling the ideal LuxR consensus motif can restore in vivo function to a LuxR mutant. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how a single protein can recognize a variety of binding sites to differentially regulate gene expression.

Bacteria use the cell-cell communication process called quorum sensing to regulate collective behaviors. In vibrios, LuxR-type transcription factors control the quorum-sensing gene expression cascade. LuxR-type proteins are structural homologs of TetR-type transcription factors. LuxR proteins were assumed to function analogously to TetR proteins, which typically bind to a single conserved binding site to repress transcription of one or two genes. We find here that unlike TetR proteins, LuxR acts a global regulator, directly binding upstream of and controlling more than 100 genes. Again unlike TetR, LuxR functions as both an activator and a repressor, and these two activities can be separated by mutagenesis. Finally, the consensus binding motifs driving LuxR-activated and -repressed genes are distinct. This work shows that LuxR, although structurally similar to TetR, has evolved unique features enabling it to differentially control a large regulon of genes in response to quorum-sensing cues.

In vivo transcription dynamics of the galactose operon: a study on the promoter transition from P1 to P2 at onset of stationary phase

Quantitative analyses of the 5′ end of gal transcripts indicate that transcription from the galactose operon P1 promoter is higher during cell division. When cells are no longer dividing, however, transcription is initiated more often from the P2 promoter. Escherichia coli cells divide six times before the onset of the stationary phase when grown in LB containing 0.5% galactose at 37°C. Transcription from the two promoters increases, although at different rates, during early exponential phase (until the third cell division, OD₆₀₀ 0.4), and then reaches a plateau. The steady-state transcription from P1 continues in late exponential phase (the next three cell divisions, OD₆₀₀ 3.0), after which transcription from this promoter decreases. However, steady-state transcription from P2 continues 1 h longer into the stationary phase, before decreasing. This longer steady-state P2 transcription constitutes the promoter transition from P1 to P2 at the onset of the stationary phase. The intracellular cAMP concentration dictates P1 transcription dynamics; therefore, promoter transition may result from a lack of cAMP-CRP complex binding to the gal operon. The decay rate of gal-specific transcripts is constant through the six consecutive cell divisions that comprise the exponential growth phase, increases at the onset of the stationary phase, and is too low to be measured during the stationary phase. These data suggest that a regulatory mechanism coordinates the synthesis and decay of gal mRNAs to maintain the observed gal transcription. Our analysis indicates that the increase in P1 transcription is the result of cAMP-CRP binding to increasing numbers of galactose operons in the cell population.

LmrR-mediated gene regulation of multidrug resistance in Lactococcus lactis

Multidrug resistance (MDR) in Lactococcus lactis is due to the expression of the membrane ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter LmrCD. In the absence of drugs, the transcriptional regulator LmrR prevents expression of the lmrCD operon by binding to its operator site. Through an autoregulatory mechanism LmrR also suppresses its own expression. Although the lmrR and lmrCD genes have their own promoters, primer extension analysis showed the presence of a long transcript spanning the entire lmrR-lmrCD cluster, in addition to various shorter transcripts harbouring the lmrCD genes only. 'In-gel' Cu-phenanthroline footprinting analysis indicated an extensive interaction between LmrR and the lmrR promoter/operator region. Atomic force microscopy imaging of the binding of LmrR to the control region of lmrR DNA showed severe deformations indicative of DNA wrapping and looping, while LmrR binding to a fragment containing the lmrCD control region induced DNA bending. The results further suggest a drug-dependent regulation mechanism in which the lmrCD genes are co-transcribed with lmrR as a polycistronic messenger. This leads to an LmrR-mediated regulation of lmrCD expression that is exerted from two different locations and by distinct regulatory mechanisms.

Quantification of the galactose-operon mRNAs 5 bases different in their 5'-ends

Three assay methods for quantification of the two galactoseoperon mRNAs that only differ by 5 bases in their 5'-end are presented. The 5' ends of each mRNA were extended by ligating the 3'-end of the abundant 5S rRNA. This ligation extends the 5' ends of the two gal mRNAs long enough to be distinguished by the specific PCR primers in the following quantification reactions. Quantification of the corresponding cDNAs was performed either by primer extension assay or real-time qPCR. To circumvent the problem of the RNA ligation reaction (i.e. very low ligation efficiency), we devised a new method that employs real-time qPCR directly for the quantification of the gal transcripts which differ by 5 bases in their 5'-ends.

Bacterial growth on lactose: an experimental investigation

A wild-type strain of Klebsiella oxytoca growing aerobically in batch culture has exhibited intermittent or oscillatory growth while growing on lactose at concentrations on the order of 1 g/L or less. In two-substrate experiments, preferred growth on glucose followed by growth on lactose also produced oscillatory growth behavior during the lactose growth phase at lactose concentrations of 1 g/L or less. Only oscillations in cell density have currently been observed. Alkalinization of the medium during growth on lactose indicated the presence of lactose active transport. The observed intermittent growth was reduced or removed during growth on lactose after preferred growth on galactose or in a medium containing 50 mM NaCl. Results suggested that the presence of an intracellular energy source or a sufficient DeltapH buffer may alleviate growth inhibition when transport and growth processes compete for essential energy resources during growth on lactose.

Induction of the galactose enzymes in Escherichia coli is independent of the C-1-hydroxyl optical configuration of the inducer D-galactose

The two optical forms of aldohexose galactose differing at the C-1 position, alpha-D-galactose and beta-D-galactose, are widespread in nature. The two anomers also occur in di- and polysaccharides, as well as in glycoconjugates. The anomeric form of D-galactose, when present in complex carbohydrates, e.g., cell wall, glycoproteins, and glycolipids, is specific. Their interconversion occurs as monomers and is effected by the enzyme mutarotase (aldose-1-epimerase). Mutarotase and other D-galactose-metabolizing enzymes are coded by genes that constitute an operon in Escherichia coli. The operon is repressed by the repressor GalR and induced by D-galactose. Since, depending on the carbon source during growth, the cell can make only one of the two anomers of D-galactose, the cell must also convert one anomer to the other for use in specific biosynthetic pathways. Thus, it is imperative that induction of the gal operon, specifically the mutarotase, be achievable by either anomer of D-galactose. Here we report in vivo and in vitro experiments showing that both alpha-D-galactose and beta-D-galactose are capable of inducing transcription of the gal operon with equal efficiency and kinetics. Whereas all substitutions at the C-1 position in the alpha configuration inactivate the induction capacity of the sugar, the effect of substitutions in the beta configuration varies depending upon the nature of the substitution; methyl and phenyl derivatives induce weakly, but the glucosyl derivative does not.

DNA sequences in gal operon override transcription elongation blocks

The DNA loop that represses transcription from galactose (gal) promoters is infrequently formed in stationary-phase cells because the concentration of the loop architectural protein HU is significantly low at that state, resulting in expression of the operon in the absence of the gal inducer D-galactose. Unexpectedly, transcription from the gal promoters under these conditions overrides physical block because of the presence of the Gal repressor bound to an internal operator (O(I)) located downstream of the promoters. We have shown here that although a stretch of pyrimidine residues (UUCU) in the RNA:DNA hybrid located immediately upstream of O(I) weakens the RNA:DNA hybrid and favors RNA polymerase (RNAP) pausing and backtracking, a stretch of purines (GAGAG) in the RNA present immediately upstream of the pause sequence in the hybrid acts as an antipause element by stabilizing the RNA:DNA duplex and preventing backtracking. This facilitates forward translocation of RNAP, including overriding of the DNA-bound Gal repressor barrier at O(I). When the GAGAG sequence is separated from the pyrimidine sequence by a 5-bp DNA insertion, RNAP backtracking is favored from a weak hybrid to a more stable hybrid. RNAP backtracking is sensitive to Gre factors, D-galactose, and antisense oligonucleotides. The ability of a native DNA sequence to override transcription elongation blocks in the gal operon uncovers a previously unknown way of regulating gal metabolism in Escherichia coli. It also explains the synthesis of gal enzymes in the absence of inducer for biosynthetic reactions.

Establishment of an mRNA gradient depends on the promoter: an investigation of polarity in gene expression

We found six mRNA species specific to the galactose operon of Escherichia coli. Analyses of both ends of the mRNAs indicated that while the 5' ends are fixed at the promoter region, the 3' ends vary along the operon. The resulting gal mRNA map suggests generation of an mRNA concentration gradient that is higher in the promoter-proximal region and lower toward the distal region. Real-time RT-PCR analyses of the amount of each mRNA species confirmed the existence of the gradient. This gradient of mRNA concentration could serve as an underlying mechanism for the long known phenomenon "natural polarity." Further analyses of the 3' ends of the mRNAs showed that they are generated by either an unknown mRNA processing/transcription termination mechanism(s) or Rho-dependent intra-cistronic transcription termination. The results showed also that transcription from the P2 promoter can yield a more severe mRNA gradient than that from the P1 promoter, suggesting that the slope of the mRNA gradient depends on which promoter the transcription has initiated from. These results led us to suggest a novel gene regulation model in which transcription initiation is tightly coupled to mRNA processing and/or transcription termination.

Cyclic AMP-dependent functional forms of cyclic AMP receptor protein from Vibrio cholerae

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) from Escherichia coli, involved in the transcriptional regulation of a number of genes and operons, works by binding to specific sites upstream of promoters. CRP also binds cyclic AMP (cAMP), and this binding, which causes conformational changes in CRP, is mandatory for its activity. A cAMP-dependent variation in the conformation as well as biological activity of E. coli CRP has been reported, with the cAMP-CRP complex formed at high cAMP concentrations resembling the uncomplexed apoprotein CRP. CRP from Vibrio cholerae, which plays an important role in the regulation of virulence gene expression, has a 95% sequence identity with the E. coli protein. We have purified and characterized V. cholerae CRP and studied its transcription activation properties as a function of increasing cAMP concentrations. A biphasic dependence on cAMP levels was observed, similar to that found for E. coli CRP. The implications of these results on regulation of cAMP-CRP dependent promoters in V. cholerae has been discussed.

Axiom of determining transcription start points by RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli

To investigate the determining factors in the selection of the transcription start points (tsp) by RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli, we systematically deleted or substituted single base pairs (bps) at 25 putative critical positions in the two extended -10 promoters, P1 and P2, of the gal operon. These changes extend downstream from -24 to +1 of the P1 promoter. In vitro transcription assays using supercoiled DNA templates revealed a preference for a purine in the non-template strand for tsp in both promoters. The optimal tsp is the 11th bp counting downstream from the -10 position. A single bp deletion anywhere from -10 to +1 switched the tsp to the next available purine 2-3 bp downstream on the non-template strand whereas deleting a single bp at position from -24 to -11 did not affect the tsp. The nature of the 10 bp sequence of the -10 to -1 region, while affecting promoter strength, did not influence tsp. The cAMP-CRP complex, which stimulates P1 and represses P2, did not affect the tsp selection process. The rules of tsp selection by RNA polymerase containing sigma70 in gal and pyr promoters discussed here may be applicable to others.

lacP1 promoter with an extended -10 motif. Pleiotropic effects of cyclic AMP protein at different steps of transcription initiation

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), which activates transcription from the wild-type lacP1 promoter and most of its mutants, represses productive RNA synthesis from a lacP1 promoter variant that contains an extended -10 element, although CRP enhances RNA polymerase binding as well as open complex formation in both promoters. Moreover, abortive RNA synthesis, which is already higher in the extended -10 variant compared with the parent promoter, was further enhanced by CRP. These results, together with the observed decrease in productive RNA synthesis, indicate that CRP, while facilitating the earlier steps of initiation, inhibits transcription from the extended -10 lacP1 by hindering promoter clearance. We propose that CRP decreases energetic barriers to RNA polymerase binding, isomerization, and abortive RNA synthesis but stabilizes the abortive RNA initiating complex, which results in increasing the activation energy of the transition state before the elongation complex. The results demonstrate for the first time that a DNA-binding regulatory protein acts as an activator or a repressor in different steps of the transcription initiation pathway because of the energetic differences of the intermediate complex in the same promoter.

A "master" in base unpairing during isomerization of a promoter upon RNA polymerase binding

Isomerization of a closed to open complex of a promoter upon RNA polymerase binding involves base unpairing at the -10 region. After potassium permanganate sensitivity of unpaired thymine residues, we studied base unpairing at the -10 region during isomerization upon RNA polymerase binding at the P1 and P3 promoters of the gal operon. Substitution of adenine by 2-amino purine (2-AP) at the invariable A small middle dotT base pair at the -11 position of P1 and P3 prevented unpairing not only at that position but also at the other downstream positions, suggesting a "master" role of the adenine base at -11 of the template strand in overall base unpairing. 2-AP at -11 did not inhibit the formation of RNA polymerase small middle dotpromoter complex and subsequent isomerization of the polymerase. Substitution of adenine by 2-AP at several other positions did not affect thymine unpairing. Changing the position of the amino group from C6 in adenine to C2 in 2-AP is mutational only at the master switch position, -11.

Positioning of region 4 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma(70) subunit by a transcription activator

A DNA cleavage reagent, specifically tethered to residue 581 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma(70) subunit, has been used to investigate the location of sigma(70) region 4 in different complexes at the galp(1) promoter and the effect of the cyclic AMP receptor protein. The positions of DNA cleavage by the reagent are not affected by the cyclic AMP receptor protein. We conclude that transcription activation at the galp(1) promoter by the cyclic AMP receptor protein does not involve major conformation changes in or repositioning of sigma(70) region 4.

Reiterative transcription initiation from galP2 promoter of Escherichia coli

The expression of gal operon in Escherichia coli is driven by two promoters, P1 and P2 separated by 5 bp. The transcription initiated from the P2 generates a large amount of abortive transcripts to produce a comparable amount of full-length transcript as P1 in vitro. In this study, we investigated the source of the abortive transcripts by employing a quantitative potassium permanganate footprinting method that determines the extent of open promoter complex formation. The extents of open promoter complex formation at the two gal promoters were about the same during the given reaction time while the amount of transcription initiation determined by in vitro transcription assay showed a considerable difference: several hundred-fold more transcription initiation from the P2 than the P1, most of which was abortive. Thus, it was concluded that the abortive transcripts are generated reiteratively by a small fraction of RNA polymerase. An in vitro transcription assay using an immobilized DNA template revealed that the fraction of RNA polymerase generating abortive transcripts never produces the full-length transcript and it remains bound to the promoter. We concluded that there are two kinds of RNA polymerase-promoter complexes formed at galP2, at least in vitro, productive complex and nonproductive complex; and, the nonproductive complex is responsible for generating large amount of abortive transcripts from the P2.

Transcription regulation by repressosome and by RNA polymerase contact

The original model of repression of transcription initiation is steric interference of RNA polymerase binding to a promoter by its repressor protein bound to a DNA site that overlaps the promoter. From the results described here, we propose two other mechanisms of repressor action, both of which involve formation of higher-order DNA-multiprotein complexes. These models also explain the problem of RNA polymerase gaining access to a promoter in the condensed nucleoid in response to an inducing signal to initiate transcription.

Functional roles of the two cyclic AMP-dependent forms of cyclic AMP receptor protein from Escherichia coli

The cyclic AMP receptor protein activates transcription in Escherichia coli, only when complexed with cyclic AMP. The cyclic AMP receptor protein-cyclic AMP complex formed at low concentrations of cyclic AMP has a different conformation from either cyclic AMP receptor protein alone or its complex with cyclic AMP formed at high cyclic AMP concentrations. Various biophysical data suggest that the latter complex resembles free cyclic AMP receptor protein. We have examined the conformational and biological properties of cyclic AMP receptor protein as a function of cyclic AMP concentrations, using the gal operon of E. coli. A biphasic behavior is observed. It is shown that only the complex formed at lower concentrations of cyclic AMP is the transcriptionally active form. This difference between the complexes at different levels of cyclic AMP arises from a decreased ability of the cyclic AMP receptor protein-cyclic AMP complex at high cyclic AMP concentrations to bind to DNA at specific sites.

Negative regulation of IS2 transposition by the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein complex

Three sequences similar to that of the consensus binding sequence of the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex were found in the major IS2 promoter region. Experiments were performed to determine whether the cAMP-CRP complex plays a role in the regulation of IS2 transposition. In the gel retardation assay, the cAMP-CRP complex was found to be able to bind the major IS2 promoter. A DNA footprinting assay confirmed that the cAMP-CRP complex binds to the sequences mentioned above. With an IS2 promoter-luciferase gene fusion construct, the cAMP-CRP complex was shown to inhibit transcription from the major IS2 promoter. IS2 was found to transpose at a frequency approximately 200-fold higher in an Escherichia coli host defective for CRP or adenyl cyclase than in a wild-type host. These results suggest that the cAMP-CRP complex is a negative regulator of IS2 transposition.

Repressor induced site-specific binding of HU for transcriptional regulation

Transcription from two overlapping gal promoters is repressed by Gal repressor binding to bipartite gal operators, O(E) and O(I), which flank the promoters. Concurrent repression of the gal promoters also requires the bacterial histone-like protein HU which acts as a co-factor. Footprinting experiments using iron-EDTA-coupled HU show that HU binding to gal DNA is orientation specific and is specifically dependent upon binding of GalR to both O(E) and O(I). We propose that HU, in concert with GalR, forms a specific nucleoprotein higher order complex containing a DNA loop. This way, HU deforms the promoter to make the latter inactive for transcription initiation while remaining sensitive to inducer. The example of gal repression provides a model for studying how a 'condensed' DNA becomes available for transcription.

The cyclic AMP receptor protein is the main activator of pectinolysis genes in Erwinia chrysanthemi

The main virulence factors of the phytopathogenic bacterium Erwinia chrysanthemi are pectinases that cleave pectin, a major constituent of the plant cell wall. Although physiological studies suggested that pectinase production in Erwinia species is subjected to catabolite repression, the direct implication of the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) in this regulation has never been demonstrated. To investigate the role of CRP in pectin catabolism, we cloned the E. chrysanthemi crp gene by complementation of an Escherichia coli crp mutation and then constructed E. chrysanthemi crp mutants by reverse genetics. The carbohydrate fermentation phenotype of the E. chrysanthemi crp mutants is similar to that of an E. coli crp mutant. Furthermore, these mutants are unable to grow on pectin or polygalacturonate as the sole carbon source. Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the E. chrysanthemi crp gene revealed the presence of a 630-bp open reading frame (ORF) that codes for a protein highly similar to the CRP of E. coli. Using a crp::uidA transcriptional fusion, we demonstrated that the E. chrysanthemi CRP represses its own expression, probably via a mechanism similar to that described for the E. coli crp gene. Moreover, in the E. chrysanthemi crp mutants, expression of pectinase genes (pemA, pelB, pelC, pelD, and pelE) and of genes of the intracellular part of the pectin degradation pathway (ogl, kduI, and kdgT), which are important for inducer formation and transport, is dramatically reduced in induced conditions. In contrast, expression of pelA, which encodes a pectate lyase important for E. chrysanthemi pathogenicity, seems to be negatively regulated by CRP. The E. chrysanthemi crp mutants have greatly decreased maceration capacity in potato tubers, chicory leaves, and celery petioles as well as highly diminished virulence on saintpaulia plants. These findings demonstrate that CRP plays a crucial role in expression of the pectinolysis genes and in the pathogenicity of E. chrysanthemi.

Thyroid-stimulating hormone-induced down-regulation of thyroid transcription factor 1 in rat thyroid FRTL-5 cells

Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) is thought to play an important role in the expression of genes that encode thyroid-specific proteins such as thyroglobulin, thyroid peroxidase, and TSH-receptor. The role of TSH in the regulation of TTF-1 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein abundance was investigated in rat thyroid FRTL-5 cells. Northern blot analysis revealed that TSH reduced TTF-1 mRNA abundance in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Immunoblot analysis with rabbit antibodies prepared against a recombinant fragment of TTF-1 expressed in bacteria showed that TSH also reduced the amount of TTF-1 protein in FRTL-5 cells. Whereas the effect of TSH on TTF-1 mRNA was apparent after 3 h, the effect on TTF-1 protein was not apparent until 12 h after TSH addition to the cells. Both TTF-1 mRNA and protein were significantly decreased after the addition of (Bu)2 cAMP or forskolin for 24 h, whereas they were not decreased by 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate. These results indicate that TSH down-regulates TTF-1 expression in FRTL-5 cells via the cAMP pathway.

The nucleotide sequence of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyrE-crc-rph region and the purification of the crc gene product

The gene (crc) responsible for catabolite repression control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been cloned and sequenced. Flanking the crc gene are genes encoding orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (pyrE) and RNase PH (rph). New crc mutants were constructed by disruption of the wild-type crc gene. The crc gene encodes an open reading frame of 259 amino acids with homology to the apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease family of DNA repair enzymes. However, crc mutants do not have a DNA repair phenotype, nor can the crc gene complement Escherichia coli DNA repair-deficient strains. The crc gene product was overexpressed in both P. aeruginosa and in E. coli, and the Crc protein was purified from both. The purified Crc proteins show neither apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease nor exonuclease activity. Antibody to the purified Crc protein reacted with proteins of similar size in crude extracts from Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas fluorescens, suggesting a common mechanism of catabolite repression in these three species.

Transcription regulation by inflexibility of promoter DNA in a looped complex

The gal operon of Escherichia coli is negatively regulated by repressor binding to bipartite operators separated by 11 helical turns of DNA. Synergistic binding of repressor to separate sites on DNA results in looping, with the intervening DNA as a topologically closed domain containing the two promoters. A closed DNA loop of 11 helical turns, which is in-flexible to torsional changes, disables the promoters either by resisting DNA unwinding needed for open complex formation or by impeding the processive DNA contacts by an RNA polymerase in flux during transcription initiation. Interaction between two proteins bound to different sites on DNA modulating the activity of the intervening segment toward other proteins by allostery may be a common mechanism of regulation in DNA-multiprotein complexes.

The NocR repressor-activator protein regulates expression of the nocB and nocR genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens

The NocR protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens was found to regulate expression of the divergently transcribed nocB and nocR genes of the pTiT37 nopaline catabolism (noc) region. Experiments using the firefly luciferase (luc) gene as reporter demonstrated that NocR represses and activates transcription from the nocB promoter in the absence and presence of nopaline, respectively. NocR also negatively autoregulates its own synthesis irrespective of the presence of nopaline. Regulation of expression of both nocB and nocR is mediated by binding of the NocR protein to the nocR promoter. A 12 bp symmetrical sequence, which lies 3 bp downstream of the -10 hexamer of the nocR promoter, was confirmed to be essential for binding of the NocR protein. Functional localization of the nocB and nocR promoters verified that they do not overlap at all, and that the interrupted dyad, at which NocR binds, is 137 bp upstream of the regulated nocB promoter. The in vivo and in vitro results described here and those published previously suggest that a novel type of regulatory mechanism, which may involve changes in DNA topology, controls gene expression in the noc operon of pTiT37.

Identification of a complex operator for galP1, the glucose-sensitive, galactose-dependent promoter of the Streptomyces galactose operon

The galP1 promoter is responsible for galactose-dependent, glucose-sensitive transcription of the galactose utilization operon of Streptomyces coelicolor and Streptomyces lividans. We describe the characterization of mutations that were positioned directly upstream of the apparent transcription start site of galP1 and that resulted in deregulated expression. Certain combinations of base changes within a series of hexamers that lie within two pairs of direct repeat sequences resulted in significant expression from galP1 in the absence of inducer. These motifs are further implicated in regulation by the observation that DNA fragments containing the hexamers and direct repeat sequences resulted in increased transcription from the chromosomal copy of galP1 on multicopy plasmids in the absence of galactose. We suggest that these hexamers and direct repeat sequences constitute an operator for the negative regulation of the Streptomyces gal operon.

RNA polymerase idling and clearance in gal promoters: use of supercoiled minicircle DNA template made in vivo

We have developed an in vivo system to engender supercoiled "minicircle" DNA containing a single promoter by using the integrative recombination system of bacteriophage lambda. The resulting minicircle templates allow quantitative analysis of the stages of transcription initiation from a promoter, including synthesis of both full-length and aborted transcripts in the same reactions under physiological conditions. We have used such minicircle DNA templates to study in vitro transcription of the Escherichia coli gal promoter. The full-length transcripts from gal P1 and P2 promoters responded to cAMP-cAMP receptor protein in a manner identical to that observed in vivo. There is a 3.5-fold stimulation of P1 and almost total inhibition of P2 in the presence of cAMP. Thus, the unitary promoter system described here duplicates the in vivo physiology. In spite of the synthesis in equimolar amounts of full-length transcripts from P1 and P2 in the absence of cAMP in vitro, as in vivo, RNA polymerase encountered different rate-limiting steps of transcription initiation at the two promoters.

Control of gal transcription through DNA looping: inhibition of the initial transcribing complex

Involvement of DNA looping between two spatially separated gal operators, OE and OI, in repression of the gal operon has been demonstrated in vivo. An in vitro transcription assay using a minicircle DNA containing the gal promoter region with lac operators was employed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of repression. Wild-type lac repressors (LacI+ protein molecules), which are capable of associating into a tetramer and forming a DNA loop, repressed transcription from promoter sites P1 and P2, whereas a non-looping lac repressor mutant (LacI(adi)) failed to show normal repression of both of the gal promoters. Thus a DNA loop is also required for repression of transcription in vitro. Repression mediated by DNA looping resulted in the inhibition of the synthesis of complete as well as aborted transcripts, demonstrating that the repressive action was on the formation or activity of the initial transcribing complex. Under similar conditions, the gal repressor (GalR protein) did not repress the gal promoters effectively, apparently because it failed to loop DNA containing gal operators in the purified system. The component(s) or conditions that aid GalR in DNA looping remain to be identified.

Mapping the cAMP receptor protein contact site on the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

The C-terminal region (amino acid residues 236-329) of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit carries the contact site I for positive transcription factors. For detailed mapping of the contact site for the cAMP receptor protein (CRP), we made a library of mutant rpoA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mutagenesis, such that each should carry a single mutation on average and exclusively in the C-terminal half of the rpoA gene, and then screened this library for mutants with decreased expression of the lacZ gene. Reconstituted holoenzyme containing the mutant alpha subunits transcribed galP1 but not lacP1 in vitro in the presence of cAMP-CRP. DNA sequence determination of several 'Lac-' mutant rpoA genes revealed that all had mutations clustered within a short segment near the C-terminus of alpha, between amino acid residues 265 and 270. A cluster of contact sites appear to exist within the contact site I region, each comprising of about five amino acids and responding in molecular communication with a different transcription factor(s).

Supercoiling, integration host factor, and a dual promoter system, participate in the control of the bacteriophage lambda pL promoter

The high level of efficiency of the bacteriophage lambda pL promoter is dependent upon the topological state of the promoter DNA and the binding of a DNA-bending protein, IHF, to a site centered -86 base-pairs upstream from the pL transcription start site. Abortive initiation assays indicate that DNA supercoiling stimulates open complex formation, whereas IHF enhances promoter recognition. IHF stimulates promoter recognition to the same extent on linear and supercoiled templates. We found that the pL region contains a second promoter, pL2, that initiates transcription 42 base-pairs upstream from pL. Although competitive with pL and inhibited by IHF, mutations in pL2 do not affect the regulation of pL. Stimulation by IHF is helix-face-dependent. IHF inhibits pL when the IHF binding site is displaced a helical half-turn upstream. The pL sequences protected against DNase I digestion by bound IHF and RNA polymerase do not overlap. However, DNase I-hypersensitive sites appear in the region between the two bound proteins. In addition, IHF enhances RNA polymerase binding to pL. These data suggest that stimulation of pL by IHF involves the interaction of IHF and RNA polymerase to form a loop or otherwise distort the DNA between their binding sites.

Regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters. Simultaneous interaction of RNA polymerase, gal repressor and CAP/cAMP

The regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters by galactose repressor and catabolite activator protein/cyclic AMP (CAP/cAMP) was investigated in DNA-binding and kinetic experiments performed in vitro. We found that gal repressor and CAP/cAMP bind to the gal regulatory region independently, resulting in simultaneous occupancy of the two gal operators and the CAP/cAMP binding site. Both CAP/cAMP and gal repressor altered the partitioning of RNA polymerase between the two overlapping gal promoters. Open complexes formed in the absence of added regulatory proteins were partitioned between gal P1 and P2 with occupancies of 25% and 75%, respectively. CAP/cAMP caused open complexes to be formed nearly exclusively at P1 (98% occupancy). gal repressor caused a co-ordinated, but incomplete, switch in promoter partitioning from P1 to P2 in both the absence and presence of CAP/cAMP. We measured the kinetic constants governing open complex formation and decay at the gal promoters in the absence and presence of gal repressor and CAP/cAMP. CAP/cAMP had the largest effect on the kinetics of open complex formation, resulting in a 30-fold increase in the apparent binding constant. We conclude that the regulation of open complex formation at the gal promoters does not result from competition between gal repressor, CAP/cAMP and RNA polymerase for binding at the gal operon regulatory region, but instead results from the interactions of the three proteins during the formation of a nucleoprotein complex on the gal DNA fragment. Finally, we present a kinetic model for the regulation of open complex formation at the gal operon.

Catabolite gene activator protein activation of lac transcription

Images

Competing promoters in prokaryotic transcription

Two (or more) bacterial promoters are often found in close proximity, and may compete for the binding of RNA polymerase. These competing promoters have interesting characteristics in vitro and analysis of the competition should be valuable to kinetic studies of more complex transcription systems.

Cloning of a catabolite repression control (crc) gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, expression of the gene in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Mutants which are defective in catabolite repression control (CRC) of multiple independently regulated catabolic pathways have been previously described. The mutations were mapped at 11 min on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa chromosome and designated crc. This report describes the cloning of a gene which restores normal CRC to these Crc- mutants in trans. The gene expressing this CRC activity was subcloned on a 2-kb piece of DNA. When this 2-kb fragment was placed in a plasmid behind a phage T7 promoter and transcribed by T7 RNA polymerase, a soluble protein with a molecular weight (MW) of about 30,000 was produced in Escherichia coli. A soluble protein of identical size was overproduced in a Crc- mutant when it contained the 2-kb fragment on a multicopy plasmid. This protein could not be detected in the mutant containing the vector without the 2-kb insert or with no plasmid. When a 0.3-kb AccI fragment was removed from the crc gene and replaced with a kanamycin resistance cassette, the interrupted crc gene no longer restored CRC to the mutant, and the mutant containing the interrupted gene no longer overproduced the 30,000-MW protein. Pools of intracellular cyclic AMP and the activities of adenylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase were measured in mutant and wild-type strains with and without a plasmid containing the crc gene. No consistent differences between any strains were found in any case. These results provide original evidence for a 30,000-MW protein encoded by crc+ that is required for wild-type CRC in P. aeruginosa and confirms earlier reports that the mode of CRC is cyclic AMP independent in this bacterium.

Functional map of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: two modes of transcription activation by positive factors

The role of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in transcription activation by positive factors was investigated using two reconstituted mutant RNA polymerases (containing C-terminally truncated alpha subunits) and three positive factors [the cAMP receptor protein (CRP), OmpR, and PhoB]. The mutant RNA polymerases did not respond to transcription activation by activator proteins that bind upstream of the respective promoters. Transcription by these mutant enzymes was, however, activated in the cases where activators bind to target sites that overlap the promoter -35 region. Two different mechanisms are proposed for the positive control of transcription by activator proteins, one requiring the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit, and the other not requiring it.

Molecular mechanism of negative autoregulation of Escherichia coli crp gene

Transcription of the Escherichia coli crp gene encoding cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is negatively regulated by CRP-cAMP complex that binds to a specific site located downstream from the transcription start site. The binding of CRP-cAMP to this site activates transcription from a second divergent overlapping promoter. The mechanism of this negative autoregulation of the crp gene has been investigated by in vitro transcription, gel shift, DNase I footprinting, and exonuclease III protection assays. We demonstrated that the crp and divergent promoters are reciprocally and coordinately regulated by CRP-cAMP. The abortive initiation assay revealed that the divergent RNA itself is not required for the inhibition of crp transcription. Detailed binding studies revealed that CRP-cAMP stimulates the binding of RNA polymerase to the divergent promoter and thus blocks the occupation of the crp promoter by RNA polymerase.

Escherichia coli catabolite gene activator protein mutants defective in positive control of lac operon transcription

We isolated three Escherichia coli catabolite gene activator protein mutants that are defective in the positive control of transcription initiation from the lac operon promoter region yet retain negative control of transcription from other promoters. One mutant has a substitution of valine for glutamate at residue 72, which lies in the cyclic AMP binding domain and contacts cyclic AMP. The other two mutants have substitutions of asparagine and cysteine for glycine 162, which lies in a surface-exposed turn of the DNA-binding domain. Surprisingly, although all three mutants can repress the lacP2/P3 promoters through the catabolite gene activator protein target site of lac, none displays strong dominance over the ability of wild-type catabolite gene activator protein to stimulate the lacP1 promoter.

Single amino acid substitutions in the cAMP receptor protein specifically abolish regulation by the CytR repressor in Escherichia coli

Promoters in Escherichia coli that are negatively regulated by the CytR repressor are also activated by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complexed to cAMP; as a characteristic, these promoters encode tandem binding sites for cAMP-CRP. In one such promoter, deoP2, CytR binds to the region between the tandem CRP binding sites with a relatively low affinity; in the presence of cAMP-CRP, however, the repressor and activator bind cooperatively to the DNA. Here we have investigated this cooperativity by isolating mutants of the CRP protein that abolish CytR regulation without exhibiting a concomitant loss in their ability to activate transcription. Four different, single amino acid substitutions in CRP give rise to this phenotype. These amino acids lie in close proximity on the surface of the CRP tertiary structure in a portion of the protein that is not in contact with the DNA. In vitro analyses of one of the CRP mutants show that it interacts with the DNA in a manner indistinguishable from wild-type CRP, whereas its interaction with CytR is perturbed. These results strongly indicate that cooperative DNA binding of CytR and cAMP-CRP is achieved through protein-protein interactions.

Further inducibility of a constitutive system: ultrainduction of the gal operon

In wild-type Escherichia coli, expression of the gal operon is negatively regulated by the Gal repressor and is induced 10- to 15-fold when the repressor is inactivated by an inducer. In strains completely deleted for galR, the gene which encodes the Gal repressor, the operon is derepressed by only 10-fold without an inducer. But this derepression is increased further by threefold during cell growth in the presence of an inducer, D-galactose or D-fucose. This phenomenon of extreme induction in the absence of Gal repressor is termed ultrainduction--a manifestation of further inducibility in a constitutive setup. Construction and characterization of gene and operon fusion strains between galE and lacZ, encoding beta-galactosidase as a reporter gene, show that ultrainduction occurs at the level of transcription and not translation. Transcription of the operon, from both the cyclic AMP-dependent P1 and the cyclic nucleotide-independent P2 promoters, is subject to ultrainduction. The wild-type galR+ gene has an epistatic effect on ultrainducibility: ultrainduction is observed only in cells devoid of Gal repressor protein. Titration experiments show the existence of an ultrainducibility factor that acts like a repressor and functions by binding to DNA segments (operators) to which Gal repressor also binds to repress the operon.

CAP binding sites reveal pyrimidine-purine pattern characteristic of DNA bending

To investigate the intrinsic bending of DNA at sites where proteins bind, we analyzed catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) binding sites and various operators from the viewpoint of DNA bending flexibility. Theoretical conformational analysis. DNase I digestion and x-ray crystallography data indicate that bending of B-DNA is highly anisotropic and sequence-dependent. Certain dimers prefer to bend into the major groove ("major-philic") and others prefer to bend into the minor groove ("minor-philic" dimers). From these data we considered TA, CG, CA:TG and GG:CC as major-philic dimers and AT,AA:TT and GT:AC as minor-philic ones. Analysis of 31 CAP binding sites has identified strong major-philic tendencies 5-7 base pairs (bp) away from the center. In addition, we found minor-philic poly-A tracts extending 4-5 bp away from the proposed major-philic bends. Finally, to analyze the central regions we followed the lead of Shumilov and classified the DNA sites by their spacer lengths [V.Y. Shumilov, Mol. Biol. (Mosk) 21, 168-187 (1987)]. In this way, we identified two subsets of CAP binding sites: one with 6 bp between the TGTGA:TCACA consensus boxes (N6-set) and one with 8 central bp (N8-set). We discovered that the dimer at the center of an N6-set site was usually major-philic, whereas at the center of an N8-set site more often minor-philic. Analysis of phages 434, P22 lambda and trp operators revealed similar results. In conclusion, our data show that CAP binding sites have major-philic and minor-philic dimers at specific positions; the location of these dimers may facilitate wrapping of DNA around CAP. A similar pattern is seen in nucleosomes.

Stringent spacing requirements for transcription activation by CRP

The cyclic AMP receptor protein-cAMP complex (CRP-cAMP) binds at a variety of distances upstream of several E. coli promoters and activates transcription. We have constructed a model system in which a consensus CRP binding site is placed at different distances upstream of the melR promoter. CRP-cAMP activates transcription from melR when bound at a number of positions, all of which lie on the same face of the DNA helix. The two distances at which transcription is strongly activated correspond exactly to those at which CRP-cAMP binds upstream of the well-studied galP1 and lac promoters. Footprinting of the synthetic promoters reveals that RNA polymerase makes identical contacts with their -10 regions even though CRP-cAMP binds at a different distance in each case. Kinetic analysis in vitro indicates that CRP-cAMP activates transcription from these promoters in similar but distinct ways. A model is proposed to explain this two-position activation.

Unwinding of duplex DNA during transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon overlapping promoters

We have used potassium permanganate as a probe to detect DNA duplex unwinding in vitro, in open complexes between E. coli RNA polymerase and DNa fragments carrying the E. coli galactose operon regulatory region. This zone contains 3 overlapping promoters which specify transcription initiation at 3 distinct startpoints. We have used mutant gal derivatives carrying different single point mutations, each of which allows initiation from only one of the 3 start sites. This has allowed us to compare duplex unwinding in open complexes at the 3 different promoters, and to show that the extent of the unwinding is similar in each case. Further, the pattern of DNA modification by potassium permanganate suggests a model for discrimination between the upper and lower strands. Finally, we show that DNA modification by potassium permanganate at the gal promoters is the same in vivo as in vitro.