A common octamer motif binding protein is involved in the transcription of U6 snRNA by RNA polymerase III and U2 snRNA by RNA polymerase II

U2.3 Precursor Small Nuclear RNA in vitro Processing Assay

Small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) are vital for eukaryotic cell activities and play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing. The molecular mechanism underlying the transcription of snRNA, regulated via upstream/downstream cis-elements and relevant trans-elements, has been investigated in detail using cell-free extracts. However, the processing of precursor snRNA (pre-snRNA), which is required by 3' end maturation of pre-snRNA, remains unclear as a proper processing assay is difficult to develop in vitro. Here, we present an in vitro method using synthetic labeled RNA as substrates to study the 3' cleavage of pre-snRNA.

Inducible Genetic Code Expansion in Eukaryotes

Genetic code expansion (GCE) is a versatile tool to site-specifically incorporate a noncanonical amino acid (ncAA) into a protein, for example, to perform fluorescent labeling inside living cells. To this end, an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase/tRNA (RS/tRNA) pair is used to insert the ncAA in response to an amber stop codon in the protein of interest. One of the drawbacks of this system is that, in order to achieve maximum efficiency, high levels of the orthogonal tRNA are required, and this could interfere with host cell functionality. To minimize the adverse effects on the host, we have developed an inducible GCE system that enables us to switch on tRNA or RS expression when needed. In particular, we tested different promotors in the context of the T-REx or Tet-On systems to control expression of the desired orthogonal tRNA and/or RS. We discuss our result with respect to the control of GCE components as well as efficiency. We found that only the T-REx system enables simultaneous control of tRNA and RS expression.

Optoribogenetic control of regulatory RNA molecules

Short regulatory RNA molecules underpin gene expression and govern cellular state and physiology. To establish an alternative layer of control over these processes, we generated chimeric regulatory RNAs that interact reversibly and light-dependently with the light-oxygen-voltage photoreceptor PAL. By harnessing this interaction, the function of micro RNAs (miRs) and short hairpin (sh) RNAs in mammalian cells can be regulated in a spatiotemporally precise manner. The underlying strategy is generic and can be adapted to near-arbitrary target sequences. Owing to full genetic encodability, it establishes optoribogenetic control of cell state and physiology. The method stands to facilitate the non-invasive, reversible and spatiotemporally resolved study of regulatory RNAs and protein function in cellular and organismal environments.

Short hairpin RNAs can be used to modulate and regulate gene expression. Here the authors generate chimeric RNAs that interact with the photoreceptor PAL, allowing for optoribogenetic control of cell physiology.

Diversity among POU transcription factors in chromatin recognition and cell fate reprogramming

The POU (Pit-Oct-Unc) protein family is an evolutionary ancient group of transcription factors (TFs) that bind specific DNA sequences to direct gene expression programs. The fundamental importance of POU TFs to orchestrate embryonic development and to direct cellular fate decisions is well established, but the molecular basis for this activity is insufficiently understood. POU TFs possess a bipartite 'two-in-one' DNA binding domain consisting of two independently folding structural units connected by a poorly conserved and flexible linker. Therefore, they represent a paradigmatic example to study the molecular basis for the functional versatility of TFs. Their modular architecture endows POU TFs with the capacity to accommodate alternative composite DNA sequences by adopting different quaternary structures. Moreover, associations with partner proteins crucially influence the selection of their DNA binding sites. The plentitude of DNA binding modes confers the ability to POU TFs to regulate distinct genes in the context of different cellular environments. Likewise, different binding modes of POU proteins to DNA could trigger alternative regulatory responses in the context of different genomic locations of the same cell. Prominent POU TFs such as Oct4, Brn2, Oct6 and Brn4 are not only essential regulators of development but have also been successfully employed to reprogram somatic cells to pluripotency and neural lineages. Here we review biochemical, structural, genomic and cellular reprogramming studies to examine how the ability of POU TFs to select regulatory DNA, alone or with partner factors, is tied to their capacity to epigenetically remodel chromatin and drive specific regulatory programs that give cells their identities.

snRNA 3' End Processing by a CPSF73-Containing Complex Essential for Development in Arabidopsis

Uridine-rich small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) are the basal components of the spliceosome and play essential roles in splicing. The biogenesis of the majority of snRNAs involves 3′ end endonucleolytic cleavage of the nascent transcript from the elongating DNA-dependent RNA ploymerase II. However, the protein factors responsible for this process remain elusive in plants. Here, we show that DEFECTIVE in snRNA PROCESSING 1 (DSP1) is an essential protein for snRNA 3′ end maturation in Arabidopsis. A hypomorphic dsp1-1 mutation causes pleiotropic developmental defects, impairs the 3′ end processing of snRNAs, increases the levels of snRNA primary transcripts (pre-snRNAs), and alters the occupancy of Pol II at snRNA loci. In addition, DSP1 binds snRNA loci and interacts with Pol-II in a DNA/RNA-dependent manner. We further show that DSP1 forms a conserved complex, which contains at least four additional proteins, to catalyze snRNA 3′ end maturation in Arabidopsis. The catalytic component of this complex is likely the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 73 kDa-I (CSPF73-I), which is the nuclease cleaving the pre-mRNA 3′ end. However, the DSP1 complex does not affect pre-mRNA 3′ end cleavage, suggesting that plants may use different CPSF73-I-containing complexes to process snRNAs and pre-mRNAs. This study identifies a complex responsible for the snRNA 3′ end maturation in plants and uncovers a previously unknown function of CPSF73 in snRNA maturation.

This study identifies a protein complex in plants that is responsible for the maturation of the 3′ ends of spliceosomal snRNAs and uncovers a novel function for the mRNA 3′ cleavage nuclease CPSF73.

snRNAs form the RNA components of the spliceosome and are required for spliceosome formation and splicing. The generation of snRNAs involves 3′ end endonucleolytic cleavage of primary snRNA transcripts (pre-snRNAs). The factors responsible for pre-snRNA 3′ end cleavage are known in metazoans, but many of these components are missing in plants. Therefore, the proteins that catalyze pre-snRNA cleavage in plants and the mechanism leading to plant snRNA 3′ maturation are unknown. Here, we show that a DSP1 complex (containing DSP1, DSP2, DSP3, DSP4, and CPFS73-I) is responsible for pre-snRNA 3′ end cleavage in Arabidopsis. We further show that CPSF73-I, which is known to cleave the pre-mRNA 3′ end, is likely the enzyme also catalyzing snRNA 3′ end maturation in plants. Interestingly, plants appear to use two different CPSF73-I-containing complexes to catalyze the maturation of mRNAs and snRNAs. The study thereby identifies an snRNA-processing complex in plants and also elucidates a new role for CPSF73-I in this process.

Contributions of in vitro transcription to the understanding of human RNA polymerase III transcription

Human RNA polymerase III transcribes small untranslated RNAs that contribute to the regulation of essential cellular processes, including transcription, RNA processing and translation. Analysis of this transcription system by in vitro transcription techniques has largely contributed to the discovery of its transcription factors and to the understanding of the regulation of human RNA polymerase III transcription. Here we review some of the key steps that led to the identification of transcription factors and to the definition of minimal promoter sequences for human RNA polymerase III transcription.

Negative regulation of human U6 snRNA promoter by p38 kinase through Oct-1

Recruitment of Oct-1 protein to the octamer sequence of U6 promoter is critical for optimal transcription by RNA polymerase III. Here we report that p38 kinase inhibitors, SB202190 and SB203580, stimulated U6 promoter activity and this stimulation can be observed only in the presence of octamer sequence. SB202190-treated cell nuclear extract had about 50% increase in Oct-1 binding activity suggesting that the increased U6 promoter activity by p38 kinase inhibitor is mediated through Oct-1. Mutation in octamer sequence significantly reduced the SB202190-stimulated U6 promoter transcription and the distance between octamer and proximal sequence element of U6 promoter is also critical for the p38 kinase inhibitor-stimulated activity. Exogenous Oct-1 expression showed a concentration-dependent activation of U6 promoter that was further stimulated by the p38 kinase inhibitors. When cells were treated with p38 kinase inducer, hydrogen peroxide or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), U6 promoter activity was down regulated and this inhibition was reversed by p38 kinase inhibitors. Over-expression of p38α kinase down-regulated U6 promoter activity and this inhibition was further enhanced by PMA and p38 kinase inhibitors reversed this inhibition. p38 kinase inhibitor-treated cells had 50% more U6 RNA than the control cells. Taken together, our results show a negative correlation between the p38 kinase levels and Oct-1 binding on U6 promoter, suggesting that U6 promoter is negatively regulated by p38 kinase.

snRNA 3' end formation: the dawn of the Integrator complex

The ubiquitously expressed uridine-rich snRNAs (small nuclear RNAs) are essential for the removal of introns, proper expression of histone mRNA and biosynthesis of ribosomal RNA. Much is known about their assembly into snRNP (small nuclear ribonucleoprotein) particles and their ultimate function in the expression of other genes; however, in comparison, less is known about the biosynthesis of these critical non-coding RNAs. The sequence elements necessary for 3' end formation of snRNAs have been identified and, intriguingly, the processing of snRNAs is uniquely dependent on the snRNA promoter, indicating that co-transcriptional processing is important. However, the trans-acting RNA-processing factors that mediate snRNA processing remained elusive, hindering overall progress. Recently, the factors involved in this process were biochemically purified, and designated the Integrator complex. Since their initial discovery, Integrator proteins have been implicated not only in the production of snRNA, but also in other cellular processes that may be independent of snRNA biogenesis. In the present study, we discuss snRNA biosynthesis and the roles of Integrator proteins. We compare models of 3' end formation for different classes of RNA polymerase II transcripts and formulate/propose a model of Integrator function in snRNA biogenesis.

Cell growth- and differentiation-dependent regulation of RNA polymerase III transcription

RNA polymerase III transcribes small untranslated RNAs that fulfill essential cellular functions in regulating transcription, RNA processing, translation and protein translocation. RNA polymerase III transcription activity is tightly regulated during the cell cycle and coupled to growth control mechanisms. Furthermore, there are reports of changes in RNA polymerase III transcription activity during cellular differentiation, including the discovery of a novel isoform of human RNA polymerase III that has been shown to be specifically expressed in undifferentiated human H1 embryonic stem cells. Here, we review major regulatory mechanisms of RNA polymerase III transcription during the cell cycle, cell growth and cell differentiation.

Hybrid cytomegalovirus-U6 promoter-based plasmid vectors improve efficiency of RNA interference in zebrafish

Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) directed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III) or Pol II promoter was shown to be capable of silencing gene expression, which should permit analyses of gene functions or as a potential therapeutic tool. However, the inhibitory effect of shRNA remains problematic in fish. We demonstrated that silencing efficiency by shRNA produced from the hybrid construct composed of the CMV enhancer or entire CMV promoter placed immediately upstream of a U6 promoter. When tested the exogenous gene, silencing of an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) target gene was 89.18 +/- 5.06% for CMVE-U6 promoter group and 88.26 +/- 6.46% for CMV-U6 promoter group. To test the hybrid promoters driving shRNA efficiency against an endogenous gene, we used shRNA against no tail (NTL) gene. When vectorized in the zebrafish, the hybrid constructs strongly repressed NTL gene expression. The NTL phenotype occupied 52.09 +/- 3.06% and 51.56 +/- 3.68% for CMVE-U6 promoter and CMV-U6 promoter groups, respectively. The NTL gene expression reduced 82.17 +/- 2.96% for CMVE-U6 promoter group and 83.06 +/- 2.38% for CMV-U6 promoter group. We concluded that the CMV enhancer or entire CMV promoter locating upstream of the U6-promoter could significantly improve inhibitory effect induced by the shRNA for both exogenous and endogenous genes compared with the CMV promoter or U6 promoter alone. In contrast, the two hybrid promoter constructs had similar effects on driving shRNA.

Merging molecular imaging and RNA interference: early experience in live animals

The rapid development of non-invasive imaging techniques and imaging reporters coincided with the enthusiastic response that the introduction of RNA interference (RNAi) techniques created in the research community. Imaging in experimental animals provides quantitative or semi-quantitative information regarding the biodistribution of small interfering RNAs and the levels of gene interference (i.e., knockdown of the target mRNA) in living animals. In this review we give a brief summary of the first imaging findings that have potential for accelerating the development and testing of new approaches that explore RNAi as a method for achieving loss-of-function effects in vivo and as a promising therapeutic tool.

Transcriptional regulation of human small nuclear RNA genes

The products of human snRNA genes have been frequently described as performing housekeeping functions and their synthesis refractory to regulation. However, recent studies have emphasized that snRNA and other related non-coding RNA molecules control multiple facets of the central dogma, and their regulated expression is critical to cellular homeostasis during normal growth and in response to stress. Human snRNA genes contain compact and yet powerful promoters that are recognized by increasingly well-characterized transcription factors, thus providing a premier model system to study gene regulation. This review summarizes many recent advances deciphering the mechanism by which the transcription of human snRNA and related genes are regulated.

Characterization of an Oct1 orthologue in the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus: a negative regulator of immunoglobulin gene transcription?

BACKGROUND

The enhancer (Emu3') of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IGH) of the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) has been well characterized. The functional core region consists of two variant Oct transcription factor binding octamer motifs and one E-protein binding muE5 site. An orthologue to the Oct2 transcription factor has previously been cloned in catfish and is a functionally active transcription factor. This study was undertaken to clone and characterize the Oct1 transcription factor, which has also been shown to be important in driving immunoglobulin gene transcription in mammals.

RESULTS

An orthologue of Oct1, a POU family transcription factor, was cloned from a catfish macrophage cDNA library. The inferred amino acid sequence of the catfish Oct1, when aligned with other vertebrate Oct1 sequences, revealed clear conservation of structure, with the POU specific subdomain of catfish Oct1 showing 96% identity to that of mouse Oct1. Expression of Oct1 was observed in clonal T and B cell lines and in all tissues examined. Catfish Oct1, when transfected into both mammalian (mouse) and catfish B cell lines, unexpectedly failed to drive transcription from three different octamer-containing reporter constructs. These contained a trimer of octamer motifs, a fish VH promoter, and the core region of the catfish Emu3' IGH enhancer, respectively. This failure of catfish Oct1 to drive transcription was not rescued by human BOB.1, a co-activator of Oct transcription factors that stimulates transcription driven by catfish Oct2. When co-transfected with catfish Oct2, Oct1 reduced Oct2 driven transcriptional activation. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that catfish Oct1 (native or expressed in vitro) bound both consensus and variant octamer motifs. Putative N- and C-terminal activation domains of Oct1, when fused to a Gal4 DNA binding domain and co-transfected with Gal4-dependent reporter constructs were transcriptionally inactive, which may be due in part to a lack of residues associated with activation domain function.

CONCLUSION

An orthologue to mammalian Oct1 has been found in the catfish. It is similar to mammalian Oct1 in structure and expression. However, these results indicate that the physiological functions of catfish Oct1 differ from those of mammalian Oct1 and include negative regulation of transcription.

Characterization of two POU transcription factor family members from the urochordate Oikopleura dioica

Three POU domain containing transcription factors have been cloned from the urochordate Oikopleura dioica. Phylogenetic analysis showed that two of these (OctA1 and OctA2) are closely related members of the class II POU domain family, and one (OctB) is a member of the class III POU domain family. All three transcription factors contained a highly conserved bipartite DNA-binding POU domain with POU specific and POU homeodomains, separated by a linker region. All three proteins were shown to bind specifically to the canonical octamer motif, ATGCAAAT. The ability of these factors to drive transcription from an octamer-containing reporter construct was assessed in vertebrate B lymphocyte cell lines. Both OctA1 and OctA2 drove transcription in murine and catfish B cell lines, however, OctB did not increase the level of transcription above background levels. It is concluded that Oct transcription factors capable of functioning in a similar fashion to vertebrate Oct1/2 were present at the phylogenetic level of the urochordates.

Optimization of feline immunodeficiency virus vectors for RNA interference

RNA interference (RNAi) occurs naturally in plant and animal cells as a means for modulating gene expression. This process has been experimentally manipulated to achieve targeted gene silencing in cells, tissues, and animals, using a variety of vector systems. Here, we tested the hypothesis that vectors based on feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) could be used for coexpression of reporter constructs and RNAi expression cassettes. We found, unexpectedly, in our initial constructs that placement of RNAi expression cassettes downstream from a polymerase II (pol II)-expressed reporter gene inhibited reporter expression but not vector titer. Through a series of intermediate vector constructs, we found that placement of the RNAi expression cassette relative to the Rev response element and the pol II expression cassette was critical for efficient RNAi and reporter gene expression. These results suggested that steric factors, including RNA structure and recruitment of competing transcriptional machinery, may affect gene expression from FIV vectors. In a second series of studies, we show that target sequence silencing can be achieved in cells transduced by FIV vectors coexpressing reporter genes and 3' untranslated region resident microRNAs. The optimized FIV-based RNAi expression vectors will find broad use given the extensive tropism of pseudotyped FIV vectors for many cell types in vitro and in vivo.

Gene silencing in Xenopus laevis by DNA vector-based RNA interference and transgenesis

A vector-based RNAi expression system was developed using the Xenopus tropicalis U6 promoter, which transcribes small RNA genes by RNA polymerase III. The system was first validated in a Xenopus laevis cell line, designing a short hairpin DNA specific for the GFP gene. Co-transfection of the vector-based RNAi and the GFP gene into Xenopus XR1 cells significantly decreased the number of GFP-expressing cells and overall GFP fluorescence. Vector-based RNAi was subsequently validated in GFP transgenic Xenopus embryos. Sperm nuclei from GFP transgenic males and RNAi construct-incubated-sperm nuclei were used for fertilization, respectively. GFP mRNA and protein were reduced by approximately 60% by RNAi in these transgenic embryos compared with the control. This transgene-driven RNAi is specific and stable in inhibiting GFP expression in the Xenopus laevis transgenic line. Gene silencing by vector-based RNAi and Xenopus transgenesis may provide an alternative for 'repression of gene function' studies in vertebrate model systems.

Hybrid cytomegalovirus enhancer-h1 promoter-based plasmid and baculovirus vectors mediate effective RNA interference

Plasmid and viral vectors harboring an RNA polymerase (Pol) III promoter would be useful in achieving sustained cellular expression of short interfering RNA (siRNA) to inhibit disease-associated genes. Given that transcription machineries directed by certain Pol II and III promoters may use common factors, we investigated whether the enhancer of the Pol II cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early promoter could improve the efficacy of RNA interference mediated by the Pol III H1 promoter. We constructed a hybrid promoter by appending the CMV enhancer 5' to the H1 promoter. In the context of plasmid vectors, the hybrid promoter provided up to 50% greater inhibition of the expression of target genes than the unmodified H1 promoter and extended the silencing effect beyond that provided by the H1 promoter. Insect baculoviruses can infect a broad range of mammalian cell types. We constructed a baculovector expression cassette in which the synthesis of short hairpin RNA was under the control of the hybrid CMV enhancer-H1 promoter. This recombinant baculovirus vector was capable of suppressing expression of a target gene by 95% in cultured cells and by 82% in vivo in rat brain. These findings indicate that the hybrid CMV enhancer-H1 promoter can be used favorably for RNA interference.

RNA polymerase II mediated transcription from the polymerase III promoters in short hairpin RNA expression vector

RNA polymerase III promoters of human ribonuclease P RNA component H1, human U6, and mouse U6 small nuclear RNA genes are commonly used in short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression vectors due their precise initiation and termination sites. During transient transfection of shRNA vectors, we observed that H1 or U6 promoters also express longer transcripts enough to express several reporter genes including firefly luciferase, green fluorescent protein EGFP, and red fluorescent protein JRed. Expression of such longer transcripts was augmented by upstream RNA polymerase II enhancers and completely inhibited by downstream polyA signal sequences. Moreover, the transcription of firefly luciferase from human H1 promoter was sensitive to RNA polymerase II inhibitor alpha-amanitin. Our findings suggest that commonly used polymerase III promoters in shRNA vectors are also prone to RNA polymerase II mediated transcription, which may have negative impacts on their targeted use.

An enhanced U6 promoter for synthesis of short hairpin RNA

Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III) promoters can trigger sequence-selective gene silencing in culture and in vivo and, therefore, may be developed to treat diseases caused by dominant, gain-of-function type of gene mutations. These diseases develop in people bearing one mutant and one wild-type gene allele. While the mutant is toxic, the wild-type performs important functions. Thus, the ideal therapy must selectively silence the mutant but maintain the wild-type expression. To achieve this goal, we designed an shRNA that selectively silenced a mutant Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1(G93A)) allele that causes amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, the efficacy of this shRNA was relatively modest. Since the allele-specific shRNA has to target the mutation site, we could not scan other regions of SOD1 mRNA to find the best silencer. To overcome this problem, we sought to increase the dose of this shRNA by enhancing the Pol III promoter. Here we demonstrate that the enhancer from the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter can enhance the U6 promoter activity, the synthesis of shRNA and the efficacy of RNA interference (RNAi). Thus, this enhanced U6 promoter is useful where limited choices of shRNA sequences preclude the selection of a highly efficient RNAi target region.

The Drosophila U1 and U6 gene proximal sequence elements act as important determinants of the RNA polymerase specificity of small nuclear RNA gene promoters in vitro and in vivo

Transcription of genes coding for metazoan spliceosomal snRNAs by RNA polymerase II (U1, U2, U4, U5) or RNA polymerase III (U6) is dependent upon a unique, positionally conserved regulatory element referred to as the proximal sequence element (PSE). Previous studies in the organism Drosophila melanogaster indicated that as few as three nucleotide differences in the sequences of the U1 and U6 PSEs can play a decisive role in recruiting the different RNA polymerases to transcribe the U1 and U6 snRNA genes in vitro. Those studies utilized constructs that contained only the minimal promoter elements of the U1 and U6 genes in an artificial context. To overcome the limitations of those earlier studies, we have now performed experiments that demonstrate that the Drosophila U1 and U6 PSEs have functionally distinct properties even in the environment of the natural U1 and U6 gene 5'-flanking DNAs. Moreover, assays in cells and in transgenic flies indicate that expression of genes from promoters that contain the "incorrect" PSE is suppressed in vivo. The Drosophila U6 PSE is incapable of recruiting RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription from the U1 promoter region, and the U1 PSE is unable to recruit RNA polymerase III to transcribe the U6 gene.

An unusually compact external promoter for RNA polymerase III transcription of the human H1RNA gene

H1 RNA, the RNA component of the human nuclear RNase P, is encoded by a unique gene transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III). In this work, cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in human H1 gene transcription were characterized by transcription assays of mutant templates and DNA binding assays of recombinant proteins. Four elements, lying within 100 bp of 5'-flanking sequences, were defined to be essential for maximal in vitro and in vivo expression, consisting of the octamer, Staf, proximal sequence element (PSE) and TATA motifs. These are also encountered in the promoter elements of vertebrate snRNA genes, where the first two constitute the distal sequence element (DSE). In all the genes examined so far, the DSE is distant from the PSE and TATA box that compose the basal promoter. However, we observed a fundamental difference in the organization of the H1 RNA and snRNA gene promoters with respect to the relative spacing of the DSE and PSE. Indeed, the H1 promoter is unusually compact, with the octamer motif and Staf binding site adjacent to the PSE and TATA motifs. It thus appears that the human RNase P RNA gene has adopted a unique promoter strategy placing the DSE immediately adjacent to the basal promoter.

Transcription of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe U2 gene in vivo and in vitro is directed by two essential promoter elements

As compared to the metazoan small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), relatively little is known about snRNA synthesis in unicellular organisms. We have analyzed the transcription of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe U2 snRNA gene in vivo and in the homologous in vitro system. Deletion and linker-scanning analyses show that the S.pombe U2 promoter contains at least two elements: the spUSE centered at -55, which functions as an activator, and a TATA box at -26, which is essential for basal transcription. These data point to a similar architecture among S.pombe, plant and invertebrate snRNA promoters. Factors recognizing the spUSE can be detected in whole cell extracts by DNase I footprinting and competition studies show that the binding of these factors correlates with transcriptional activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and gel-filtration chromatography revealed a native molecular mass of approximately 200 kDa for the spUSE binding activity. Two polypeptides of molecular masses 25 and 65 kDa were purified by virtue of their ability to specifically bind the spUSE.

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein targets distinct general transcription factors to regulate RNA polymerase III gene expression

The retinoblastoma protein (RB) represses RNA polymerase III transcription effectively both in vivo and in vitro. Here we demonstrate that the general transcription factors snRNA-activating protein complex (SNAP(c)) and TATA binding protein (TBP) are important for RB repression of human U6 snRNA gene transcription by RNA polymerase III. RB is associated with SNAP(c) as detected by both coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous RB with SNAP(c) and cofractionation of RB and SNAP(c) during chromatographic purification. RB also interacts with two SNAP(c) subunits, SNAP43 and SNAP50. TBP or a combination of TBP and SNAP(c) restores efficient U6 transcription from RB-treated extracts, indicating that TBP is also involved in RB regulation. In contrast, the TBP-containing complex TFIIIB restores adenovirus VAI but not human U6 transcription in RB-treated extracts, suggesting that TFIIIB is important for RB regulation of tRNA-like genes. These results suggest that different classes of RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes have distinct general transcription factor requirements for repression by RB.

Upstream flanking sequences and transcription of SINEs

SINEs, short interspersed repeated DNA elements, undergo amplification through retroposition and subsequent integration into a new location in the genome. Each new SINE insertion will be located in a new chromosomal environment, with different flanking sequences. Modulation of transcription by different flanking sequences may play an important role in determining which SINE elements are preferentially active in a genome. We evaluated the ability of upstream flanking sequences to regulate the transcription of three different SINEs (Alu, B2 and ID) by constructing chimeric constructs with known 5' flanking sequences of RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes. Upstream sequences from the 7SL RNA gene, U6 RNA gene, vault RNA gene, and BC1 gene increase transcription of Alu, B2 and BC1 in transient transfections of NIH3T3, HeLa, Neuro2a and C6 glioma cell lines. The 7SL sequence proved most efficient in increasing SINE transcription. The 7SL upstream fused to the BC1 RNA gene (an ID element) was used to create a transgenic mouse line. In contrast to the tissue-specific endogenous BC1 transcription, BC1 transgene transcripts were detected in all tissues tested. However, expression was much higher in those tissues that express the endogenous gene, demonstrating both transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. The BC1 RNA was detected in a similar ribonucleoprotein complex in the different tissues.

Survey and summary: transcription by RNA polymerases I and III

The task of transcribing nuclear genes is shared between three RNA polymerases in eukaryotes: RNA polymerase (pol) I synthesizes the large rRNA, pol II synthesizes mRNA and pol III synthesizes tRNA and 5S rRNA. Although pol II has received most attention, pol I and pol III are together responsible for the bulk of transcriptional activity. This survey will summarise what is known about the process of transcription by pol I and pol III, how it happens and the proteins involved. Attention will be drawn to the similarities between the three nuclear RNA polymerase systems and also to their differences.

Identification of an essential proximal sequence element in the promoter of the telomerase RNA gene of Tetrahymena thermophila

Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein reverse transcriptase that synthesizes and maintains telomeric DNA. Studies of telomeres and telomerase are facilitated by the large number of linear DNA molecules found in ciliated protozoa, such as Tetrahymena thermophila. To examine the expression of telomerase, we investigated the transcription of the RNA polymerase III-directed gene encoding the RNA subunit (TER1) of this enzyme. A chimeric gene containing the Glaucoma chattoni TER1 transcribed region flanked by 5' and 3' Tetrahymena regions was used to identify promoter elements following transformation of Tetrahymena cells. Disruption of a conserved proximal sequence element (PSE) located at -55 in the Tetrahymena TER1 5' flanking region eliminated expression of the chimeric gene. In addition, mutation of an A/T-rich element at -25 decreased expression markedly. A gel mobility shift assay and protein-DNA cross-linking identified a PSE-binding polypeptide of 50-60 kDa in Tetrahymena extracts. Gel filtration analysis revealed a native molecular mass of approximately 160 kDa for this binding activity. Our results point to a similar architecture between ciliate telomerase RNA and metazoan U6 small nuclear RNA promoters.

Analysis of transcription factors binding to the human 7SL RNA gene promoter

Transcription of the human 7SL RNA gene by RNA polymerase III depends on the concerted action of transcription factors binding to the gene-internal and gene-external parts of its promoter. Here, we investigated which transcription factors interact with the human 7SL RNA gene promoter and which are required for transcription of the human 7SL RNA gene. A-box/B-box elements were previously identified in 5S RNA, tRNA, and virus associated RNA genes and are recognized by transcription factor IIIC (TFIIIC). The gene-internal promoter region of the human 7SL RNA gene shows only limited similarity to those elements. Nevertheless, competition experiments and the use of highly enriched factor preparations demonstrate that TFIIIC is required for human 7SL transcription. The gene-external part of the promoter includes an authentic cAMP-responsive element previously identified in various RNA polymerase II promoters. Here we demonstrate that members of the activating transcription factor/cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein (ATF/CREB) transcription factor family bind specifically to this element in vitro. However, the human 7SL RNA gene is not regulated by cAMP in vivo. Furthermore, in vitro transcription of the gene does not depend on ATF/CREB transcription factors. It rather appears that a transcription factor with DNA-binding characteristics like ATF/CREB proteins but otherwise different properties is required for human 7SL RNA transcription.Key words: 7SL RNA, ATF, CRE, TFIIIC, RNA polymerase III.

Transcription factor activities and gene expression during mouse mammary gland involution

Maintenance of mammary epithelial differentiation and milk production during lactation is a consequence of milk removal and the presence of lactogenic hormones, particularly glucocorticoids, insulin and prolactin. After weaning the fall in lactogenic hormones and milk stasis lead to involution, a process that is mainly characterized by three events: (i) downregulation of milk protein gene expression, (ii) loss of epithelial cells by apoptosis and, (iii) tissue remodeling and preparation of the gland for a new pregnancy. Each of these processes is likely to depend on the activity of specific sets of transcription factors in the mammary epithelium and stroma that ensure the timely and spatially coordinated expression of critical gene products such as mediators of apoptosis (e.g., caspase-1 and regulators of tissue remodeling events (e.g., matrix metalloproteinases). Here we describe signal transduction events such as activation of protein kinase A and JNK and changes in the activity of several transcription factors including Stat5, Stat3, NF1, Oct-1, and AP-1 during the early and late phases of mammary gland involution. We discuss their possible role in regulating and coordinating involution with emphasis on the apoptotic process of involution.

Oct-1 promoter region contains octamer sites and TAAT motifs recognized by Oct proteins

The 5'-upstream region (1.3 kb) of the gene encoding the POU domain transcription factor Oct-1 was cloned and sequenced. CAT reporter gene analysis of this region has detected a functionally active promoter. This region contains 24 TAAT-core sites, arranged in five clusters (four to six sites in one cluster); two octamer sites (ATGCAAAT) are located in the first and second clusters; in the second one the CCAAT-box adjacent to the octamer overlaps with the TAAT-core site. As shown by gel retardation assay, Oct-1, Oct-2, and some unknown proteins from myeloma cell line NS/0 interact with the TAAT-core sites of these clusters. The results suggest autoregulation of Oct-1 gene expression that may also be controlled by other POU proteins, homeodomain proteins and CCAAT trans-action factors.

The distal elements, OCT and SPH, stimulate the formation of preinitiation complexes on a human U6 snRNA gene promoter in vitro

The distal control region of a human U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) gene promoter contains two separable elements, octamer (OCT) and SPH, found in many vertebrate snRNA genes. Complete distal regions generally account for a 4- to 100-fold stimulation of snRNA gene promoters. We examined the mechanism of transcriptional stimulation by each element when linked to the proximal U6 promoter. Multimers of either OCT or SPH did not increase transcriptional levels above that with a single copy, either in transfected human cells or after in vitro transcription in a HeLa S100 extract. The orientation of a single SPH element differentially stimulated transcription in transfected cells, whereas the orientation of an octamer element was not important. Using Sarkosyl to limit transcription to a single-round, we concluded that promoters containing either OCT or SPH elements supported an increased number of preinitiation complexes in vitro. Furthermore, the rate of formation of U6 promoter preinitiation complexes resistant to low (0.015%) concentrations of Sarkosyl was accelerated on templates containing either OCT or SPH. However, neither element had a significant effect on the number of rounds of reinitiation in the S100 extract.

Identification and analysis of the u6 small nuclear RNA gene from Entamoeba histolytica

Among the small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) involved in the spliceosomal processing of pre-mRNA, U6 is the most conserved. As a first evidence for the presence of the splicing machinery in the amitochondrial protozoan Entamoeba histolytica (Eh), we have cloned the u6 snRNA gene. We find that in this organism u6 is a single copy gene that is transcribed as a poly(A)- RNA molecule of approximately 105 nucleotides. We have mapped the 5' end of the U6 snRNA transcript, and identified typical elements of a putative polymerase III promoter. This is the first snRNA gene reported in Eh. Sequence analysis indicates that this gene contains all the conserved nucleotides known to be important for U6 snRNA function. These results, in conjunction with the earlier finding of genes that contain pre-mRNA introns, suggest that Eh has a functional spliceosomal complex.

Genes for murine Y1 and Y3 Ro RNAs have class 3 RNA polymerase III promoter structures and are unlinked on mouse chromosome 6

Murine YRNAs, which are components of the conserved Ro ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, have been identified by enzymatic RNA sequencing. Mouse Y1 (mY1) and Y3 (mY3; originally named mY2) RNAs share 97 and 95% identity to the human Y1 and Y3 RNAs, respectively. TATA-like sequences, Proximal Sequence Elements, and octamer sequences, which are upstream promoter element motifs indicative of Class 3 RNA Polymerase III (RNAPIII) transcribed genes, are found upstream of both the putative mY1 and mY3 coding regions. Further, these elements are strikingly conserved both in sequence and position relative to known Class 3 genes and to human YRNA genes. Inhibition of transcription in vitro by 200 micrograms/ml but not 1 microgram/ml of alpha-amanitin indicates transcription of the mouse YRNA genes by RNAPIII. Southern blot of C57BL/6J and Mus spretus murine genomic DNA with mY1 and mY3 gene-specific probes suggests that these genes are single copy in the mouse genome. Finally, gene mapping with a (C57BL/6J x SPRET/Ei)F1 x SPRET/Ei mouse interspecific backcross DNA panel localizes the mY1 gene to the distal end of mouse chromosome 6, close to the motheaten (me) autoimmunity locus. The mY3 gene maps to the proximal end of mouse chromosome 6 very close to the T cell receptor beta locus, in a region homologous to human chromosome 7 where the human YRNA genes have been mapped.

Sequence-specific DNA binding of the B-cell-specific coactivator OCA-B

B-cell-specific transcription of immunoglobulin genes is mediated by the interaction of a POU domain containing transcription factor Oct-1 or Oct-2, with the B-cell-specific coactivator OCA-B (Bob-1, OBF-1) and a prototype octamer element. We find that OCA-B binds DNA directly in the major groove between the two subdomains of the POU domain, requiring both an A at the fifth position of the octamer element and contact with the POU domain. An amino-terminal fragment of OCA-B binds the octamer site in the absence of a POU domain with the same sequence specificity. Coactivator OCA-B may undergo a POU-dependent conformational change that exposes its amino terminus, allowing it to recognize specific DNA sequences in the major groove within the binding site for Oct-1 or Oct-2. The recognition of both the POU domain and the octamer sequence by OCA-B provides a mechanism for differential regulation of octamer sites containing genes by the ubiquitous factor Oct-1.

Conformational alteration of Oct-1 upon DNA binding dictates selectivity in differential interactions with related transcriptional coactivators

VP16 (termed VP16-H here) of herpes simplex virus (HSV) belongs to a family of related regulatory proteins which includes VP16-B of bovine herpesvirus (BHV). We show that VP16-B, while also being a powerful transactivator of transcription dependent on Oct-1 binding sites in its target promoters, has virtually no activity on a defined VP16-H-responsive, octamer-containing target promoter. While Oct-1 binds equally well to the VP16-B-responsive and -nonresponsive sites, VP16-B interacts with Oct-1 only when Oct-1 is bound to the BHV octamer site and not when it is bound to the HSV site. We show from the analysis of chimeric proteins that the ability of VP16-B to discriminate between the Oct-1 forms depends on features of its N-terminal region. We also show from an analysis of chimeric DNA motifs that sequences that lie 3' to the POU domain-contacting region of the HSV octamer site play a role in making it unresponsive to VP16-B. Finally, we show by high-resolution hydroxyl radical footprint analysis that the conformation of Oct-l is different on the two sites. These results augment our previous report on an allosteric effect of DNA signals on the conformation of bound proteins and indicate that different conformations of the same DNA binding protein can be recognized selectively by related members of interacting regulatory proteins. The possible implications of our observations for selective gene regulation by Oct-1, a ubiquitous transcription factor, and other multimember transcription families are discussed.

TATA elements direct bi-directional transcription by RNA polymerases II and III

Eukaryotic promoter elements specify the direction and efficiency of transcription, as well as the type of RNA polymerase to be used. One such element, the TATA box, is thought to participate in determining the direction of transcription and can function within promoters for RNA polymerase II or III, depending on the sequence context. In this report the ability of four different TATA boxes to support transcription in vitro was determined. It was found that TATA elements are not directional. However, they support transcription by RNA polymerases II and III. An upstream activating sequence was found to stimulate downstream transcription by RNA polymerase II and to inhibit upstream transcription by RNA polymerases II and III. Thus a promoter necessarily consists of a TATA element and upstream sequences in order to specify the direction of transcription and the type of polymerase to be used.

Flanking sequences of an Alu source stimulate transcription in vitro by interacting with sequence-specific transcription factors

An Alu source gene, called the EPL Alu, was previously isolated by a phylogenetic strategy. Sequences flanking the EPL Alu family member stimulate its RNA polymerase III (Pol III) template activity in vitro. One cis-acting element maps within a 40-nucleotide region immediately upstream to the EPL Alu. This same region contains an Ap1 site which, when mutated, abolishes the transcriptional stimulation provided by this region. The flanking sequence, as assayed by gel mobility shift, forms sequence-specific complexes with several nuclear factors including Ap1. These results demonstrate that an an ancestral Alu source sequence fortuitously acquired positive transcriptional control elements by insertion into the EPL locus, thereby providing biochemical evidence for a model which explains the selective amplification of Alu subfamilies.

The activity of transcription factor PBP, which binds to the proximal sequence element of mammalian U6 genes, is regulated during differentiation of F9 cells

Mouse F9 embryonic carcinoma (EC) cells differentiate in culture to parietal endoderm (PE) cells upon induction with retinoic acid and cyclic AMP. In the course of this process, the expression of polymerase III transcripts, e.g., 5S rRNA and U6 small nuclear RNA, is dramatically reduced. This reduction of endogenous RNA content is accompanied by a loss of transcriptional capacity in cell extracts from PE cells. Partial purification of such extracts reveals that the DNA-binding activity of transcription factor PBP, binding specifically to the proximal sequence element (PSE) sequence of vertebrate U6 genes, is significantly reduced. This finding is corroborated by a loss in the transcriptional activity of this factor in reconstitution assays with partially purified polymerase III transcription components. In contrast, the activity of TFIIIA and TFIIIB and the amount of free TATA-binding protein remain unchanged during the differentiation process analyzed here. These data show for the first time that the PSE-binding protein PBP is essentially involved in the differential regulation of polymerase III genes governed by external promoters.

The cellular C1 factor of the herpes simplex virus enhancer complex is a family of polypeptides

The alpha/immediate early genes of herpes simplex virus are regulated by the specific assembly of a multiprotein enhancer complex containing the Oct-1 POU domain protein, the viral alpha-transinduction factor alpha TIF, (VP16, ICP25), and the C1 cellular factor. The C1 factor from mammalian cells is a heterogeneous but related set of polypeptides that interact directly with the alpha-transinduction factor to form a heteromeric protein complex. The isolation of cDNAs encoding the polypeptides of the C1 factor suggests that these proteins are proteolytic products of a novel precursor. The sequence of the amino termini of these polypeptide products indicate that the proteins are generated by site-specific cleavages within a reiterated 20-amino acid sequence. Although the C1 factor appears to be ubiquitously expressed, it is localized to subnuclear structures in specific cell types.

BC1 RNA: transcriptional analysis of a neural cell-specific RNA polymerase III transcript

Rodent BC1 RNA represents the first example of a neural cell-specific RNA polymerase III (Pol III) transcription product. By developing a rat brain in vitro system capable of supporting Pol III-directed transcription, we showed that the rat BC1 RNA intragenic promoter elements, comprising an A box element and a variant B box element, as well as its upstream region, containing octamer-binding consensus sequences and functional TATA and proximal sequence element sites, are necessary for transcription. The BC1 B box, lacking the invariant A residue found in the consensus B boxes of tRNAs, represents a functionally related and possibly distinct promoter element. The transcriptional activity of the BC1 B box element is greatly increased, in both a BC1 RNA and a chimeric tRNA(Leu) gene construct, when the BC1 5' flanking region is present and is appropriately spaced. Moreover, a tRNA consensus B-box sequence can efficiently replace the BC1 B box only if the BC1 upstream region is removed. These interactions, identified only in a homologous in vitro system, between upstream Pol II and intragenic Pol III promoters suggest a mechanism by which the tissue-specific BC1 RNA gene and possibly other Pol III-transcribed genes can be regulated.

Interaction between a novel F9-specific factor and octamer-binding proteins is required for cell-type-restricted activity of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer

Understanding how diverse transcription patterns are achieved through common factor binding elements is a fundamental question that underlies much of developmental and cellular biology. One example is provided by the fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4) gene, whose expression is restricted to specific embryonic tissues during development and to undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma cells in tissue culture. Analysis of the cis- and trans-acting elements required for the activity of the previously identified FGF-4 enhancer in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells showed that enhancer function depends on sequences that bind Sp1 and ubiquitous as well as F9-specific octamer-binding proteins. However, sequences immediately upstream of the octamer motif, which conform to a binding site for the high-mobility group (HMG) domain factor family, were also critical to enhancer function. We have identified a novel F9-specific factor, Fx, which specifically recognizes this motif. Fx formed complexes with either Oct-1 or Oct-3 in a template-dependent manner. The ability of different enhancer variants to form the Oct-Fx complexes correlated with enhancer activity, indicating that these complexes play an essential role in transcriptional activation of the FGF-4 gene. Thus, while FGF-4 enhancer function is octamer site dependent, its developmentally restricted activity is determined by the interaction of octamer-binding proteins with the tissue-specific factor Fx.

Interaction between a novel F9-specific factor and octamer-binding proteins is required for cell-type-restricted activity of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer

Understanding how diverse transcription patterns are achieved through common factor binding elements is a fundamental question that underlies much of developmental and cellular biology. One example is provided by the fibroblast growth factor 4 (FGF-4) gene, whose expression is restricted to specific embryonic tissues during development and to undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma cells in tissue culture. Analysis of the cis- and trans-acting elements required for the activity of the previously identified FGF-4 enhancer in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells showed that enhancer function depends on sequences that bind Sp1 and ubiquitous as well as F9-specific octamer-binding proteins. However, sequences immediately upstream of the octamer motif, which conform to a binding site for the high-mobility group (HMG) domain factor family, were also critical to enhancer function. We have identified a novel F9-specific factor, Fx, which specifically recognizes this motif. Fx formed complexes with either Oct-1 or Oct-3 in a template-dependent manner. The ability of different enhancer variants to form the Oct-Fx complexes correlated with enhancer activity, indicating that these complexes play an essential role in transcriptional activation of the FGF-4 gene. Thus, while FGF-4 enhancer function is octamer site dependent, its developmentally restricted activity is determined by the interaction of octamer-binding proteins with the tissue-specific factor Fx.

Small nuclear RNA genes transcribed by either RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III in monocot plants share three promoter elements and use a strategy to regulate gene expression different from that used by their dicot plant counterparts

RNA polymerase (Pol) II- and RNA Pol III-transcribed small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes of dicotyledonous plants contain two essential upstream promoter elements, the USE and TATA. The USE is a highly conserved plant snRNA gene-specific element, and its distance from the -30 TATA box, corresponding to approximately three and four helical DNA turns in Pol III and Pol II genes, respectively, is crucial for determining RNA Pol specificity of transcription. Sequences upstream of the USE play no role in snRNA gene transcription in dicot plants. Here we show that for expression of snRNA genes in maize, a monocotyledonous plant, the USE and TATA elements are essential, but not sufficient, for transcription. Efficient expression of both Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA genes in transfected maize protoplasts requires an additional element(s) positioned upstream of the USE. This element, named MSP (for monocot-specific promoter; consensus, RGCCCR), is present in one to three copies in monocot snRNA genes and is interchangeable between Pol II- and Pol III-specific genes. The efficiency of snRNA gene expression in maize protoplast is determined primarily by the strength of the MSP element(s); this contrasts with the situation in protoplasts of a dicot plant, Nicotiana plumbaginifolia, where promoter strength is a function of the quality of the USE element. Interestingly, the organization of monocot Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters closely resembles those of equivalent vertebrate promoters. The data are discussed in the context of the coevolution of Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters within many eukaryotic organisms.

Small nuclear RNA genes transcribed by either RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III in monocot plants share three promoter elements and use a strategy to regulate gene expression different from that used by their dicot plant counterparts

RNA polymerase (Pol) II- and RNA Pol III-transcribed small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes of dicotyledonous plants contain two essential upstream promoter elements, the USE and TATA. The USE is a highly conserved plant snRNA gene-specific element, and its distance from the -30 TATA box, corresponding to approximately three and four helical DNA turns in Pol III and Pol II genes, respectively, is crucial for determining RNA Pol specificity of transcription. Sequences upstream of the USE play no role in snRNA gene transcription in dicot plants. Here we show that for expression of snRNA genes in maize, a monocotyledonous plant, the USE and TATA elements are essential, but not sufficient, for transcription. Efficient expression of both Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA genes in transfected maize protoplasts requires an additional element(s) positioned upstream of the USE. This element, named MSP (for monocot-specific promoter; consensus, RGCCCR), is present in one to three copies in monocot snRNA genes and is interchangeable between Pol II- and Pol III-specific genes. The efficiency of snRNA gene expression in maize protoplast is determined primarily by the strength of the MSP element(s); this contrasts with the situation in protoplasts of a dicot plant, Nicotiana plumbaginifolia, where promoter strength is a function of the quality of the USE element. Interestingly, the organization of monocot Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters closely resembles those of equivalent vertebrate promoters. The data are discussed in the context of the coevolution of Pol II- and Pol III-specific snRNA gene promoters within many eukaryotic organisms.

Isolation and characterization of the tandemly repeated U6 genes from the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

The tandemly repeated U6 genes were isolated from the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Each 1.8 kb repeat unit contains a single U6 RNA sequence. There are no sequence similarities between the U6 promoter and other sea urchin snRNA genes, other than a long polypyrimidine tract 3' of the U6 sequence.

Functional analysis of cis-acting DNA elements required for expression of the SL RNA gene in the parasitic protozoan Leishmania amazonensis

DNA sequences, that control expression of the spliced leader (SL) RNA gene in the parasitic protozoan Leishmania amazonensis, were mapped by block substitution mutagenesis. In the absence of a functional in vitro system for transcription, no promoter elements have yet been identified in this organism. We therefore developed an alternative in vivo approach, in which the SL RNA gene was tagged and then subjected to a series of linker scanning mutations. Each tagged and mutated SL RNA construct was introduced into parasite cells via the pX transfection vector, and was examined for expression of the tagged SL RNA followed by characterization of its transcriptional start site. The replacement of a critical DNA element was expected to prevent expression of the tagged SL RNA. We found that the putative SL RNA promoter is complex and includes two elements: one is located upstream to the coding region, between positions -30 to -70; and the other is located between -10 to +10, and includes transcribed sequences. In addition to the functional relationship between the SL RNA and vertebrate U snRNAs, we found structural similarities in their regulatory elements, which may possibly indicate a common evolutionary ancestry for these molecules.

Transcription factors required for the expression of Xenopus laevis selenocysteine tRNA in vitro

It has previously been reported that transcription in vivo of the tRNA(Sec) gene requires three promoter elements, a PSE and a TATA-box upstream of the coding region which are functionally interchangeable with the U6 snRNA gene counterparts and an internal B-block, resembling that of classical tRNA genes (1). We have established an in vitro transcription system from HeLa cells in which three factors, which are either essential for or stimulate transcription were identified. Apart from the TATA-binding protein TBP, the PSE-binding protein PBP was found to be essentially required for expression of the gene. Depletion of PBP from cell extracts by PSE-oligonucleotides abolished tRNA(Sec) transcription, which could be reconstituted by readdition of partially purified PBP. Addition of increasing amounts of recombinant human TBP to an S100 extract stimulated transcription of the tRNA(Sec), the mouse U6 snRNA and the human Y3 genes, an effect which was not observed in the case of a TATA-less tRNA gene. Purified human TFIIA strongly stimulated tRNA(Sec) transcription in a fashion depending on the concentration of TBP. Surprisingly, partially purified TFIIIC was shown to be dispensable for transcription in vitro and unable to bind the B-block of this gene in vitro, although its sequence matches the consensus for this element. Collectively, these data suggest that the mechanism by which transcription complexes are formed on the tRNA(Sec) gene is dramatically different from that observed for classical tRNA genes and much more resembles that observed for externally controlled pol III genes.

Point mutations 5' to the tRNA selenocysteine TATA box alter RNA polymerase III transcription by affecting the binding of TBP

The selenocysteine tRNA(Sec) gene possesses two external promoter elements, one of which is constituted by a strong TATA box. Point mutant analysis performed in this study led to the conclusion that the functional TATA promoter actually encompasses the sequence -34 GGGTATAAAAGG-23. Individual changes at T-31 do not affect transcription much. Position T-29 is less permissive to mutation since transversion to a G, for example, is less well tolerated than at T-31. Interestingly, a double point mutation, converting GG(-33/-32) to TT, causes abrogation of transcription in vivo and severe reduction of transcription in vitro with human TBP. Therefore, data obtained underscore the fact that, in the Xenopus tRNA(Sec), these two Gs are an integral part of the TATA promoter. Gel retardation experiments indicate that the GG to TT substitution, which led human TBP to lose its ability to support efficient transcription in vitro, correlates with the appearance of an altered pattern of retarded complexes. Altogether, the data presented in this report support a model in which TBP interacts directly with the TATA element of the tRNA(Sec) gene, in contrast to the type of interaction proposed for classical TATA-less tRNA genes.