Oral sumatriptan in acute migraine

Pilot study evaluating treatment with sumatriptan for moderate to severe post-traumatic headache: A phase 2 open-label study

OBJECTIVE

Our primary outcome was to determine the feasibility of patients with post-traumatic headache (PTH) keeping a daily headache diary and using sumatriptan as directed. Secondary outcomes include determining if sumatriptan is effective in aborting PTH and whether headache resolution is dependent on PTH phenotype.

BACKGROUND

PTH is prevalent and persistent after traumatic brain injury, yet there have been few studies evaluating the effects of pharmacological treatments in individuals with PTH.

METHODS

This is a single-arm, prospective, non-randomized phase 2 clinical trial registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01854385) and conducted from 2013 to 2017. Data analysis was completed in 2022. Of the 299 participants screened, 40 were enrolled in the study. Participants kept a headache diary documenting headache characteristics and severity. Headache characteristics were used to determine PTH phenotypes of migraine-like, probable migraine-like, or non-migraine-like. Participants reported whether sumatriptan was used for their headache, their response to the medication, if a second dose was taken, and their response to the second dose.

RESULTS

A total of 15 participants out of the 40 enrolled (mean [SD] age, 41.9 [14.2] years, and 53% [21/40] male), met the criteria for the use of sumatriptan, and completed all assessments. Average headache diary compliance rate for the final month of the study was 80% (372/465). While sumatriptan was used for only 19% (122/654) of all reported headaches, 72% (88/122) of those headaches resolved within 2 h of taking the medication. Resolution of headaches with sumatriptan was not significantly different among headache phenotypes (migraine-like: 22/38 [58%], probable migraine-like: 24/29 [83%], non-migraine-like: 6/15 [40%]; p = 0.154).

CONCLUSIONS

A daily headache diary is feasible for tracking headache symptoms. Preliminary results also suggest that sumatriptan, a migraine-specific medication, may be beneficial for the treatment of PTH of different clinical phenotypes. Future studies, such as a phase 3 clinical trial with a larger sample size, are needed to better understand the efficacy of sumatriptan in the treatment of PTH.

Medication "underuse" headache

BACKGROUND

Many risk factors have been associated with migraine progression, including insufficient and ineffective utilization of migraine medications; however, they have been inadequately explored. This has resulted in suboptimal usage of medications without effective altering of prescribing recommendations for patients, posing a risk for migraine chronification.

METHODS

Our aim is to conduct a comprehensive review of the available evidence regarding the underuse of migraine medications, both acute and preventive. The term "underuse" includes, but is not limited to: (1) ineffective use of appropriate and inappropriate medication; (2) underutilization; (3) inappropriate timing of usage; and (4) patient dissatisfaction with medication.

RESULTS

The underuse of both acute and preventive medications has been shown to contribute to the progression of migraine. In terms of acute medication, chronification occurs as a result of insufficient drug use, including failure of the prescriber to select the appropriate type based on pain intensity and disability, patients taking medication too late (more than 60 minutes after the onset or after central sensitization has occurred as evidenced by allodynia), and discontinuation because of lack of effect or intolerable side effects. The underlying cause of inadequate effectiveness of acute medication lies in its inability to halt the propagation of peripheral activation to central sensitization in a timely manner. For oral and injectable preventive migraine medications, insufficient efficacy and intolerable side effects have led to poor adherence and discontinuation with subsequent progression of migraine. The underlying pathophysiology here is rooted in the repetitive stimulation of afferent sensory pain fibers, followed by ascending brainstem pain pathways plus dysfunction of the endogenous descending brainstem pain inhibitory pathway. Although anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) medications partially address pain caused by the above factors, including decreased efficacy and tolerability from conventional therapy, some patients do not respond well to this treatment. Research suggests that initiating preventive anti-CGRP treatment at an early stage (during low frequency episodic migraine attacks) is more beneficial than commencing it during high frequency episodic attacks or when chronic migraine has begun.

CONCLUSIONS

The term "medication underuse" is underrecognized, but it holds significant importance. Optimal usage of acute care and preventive migraine medications could potentially prevent migraine chronification and improve the treatment of migraine attacks.

Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with CB/TiO2 Layer for Sensitive Determination of Sumatriptan by Means of Voltammetry and Flow Injection Analysis

Sumatriptan is an organic chemical compound from the tryptamine group. It is used as a medicine for migraine attacks and in the treatment of cluster headaches. In this work, a new voltammetric method is proposed for highly sensitive SUM determination, using glassy carbon electrodes modified with carbon black and titanium dioxide suspension. The novelty of the presented work is the usage of the mixture of carbon black and TiO₂ as glassy carbon electrode modifier for the first time for SUM determination. The mentioned sensor was characterized by great repeatability and sensitivity of measurements, which resulted in the obtention of a wide range of linearity and a low detection limit. The electrochemical properties of the CB-TiO₂/GC sensor was characterized using the LSV and EIS method. The effect of different factors on the SUM peak, such as supporting electrolyte type, preconcentration time and potential, or influence of interferents, were tested using the square wave voltammetry technique. The linear voltammetric response for the analyte was obtained in the concentration range of 5 nmol L^-1 to 150 μmol L^-1 with a detection limit of 2.9 nmol L^-1 for a preconcentration time of 150 s in the 0.1 mol L^-1 phosphate buffer pH 6.0. The proposed method was successfully applied for highly sensitive sumatriptan determination in complex matrices, such as tablets, urine, and plasma, with a good recovery parameter (94-105%). The presented CB-TiO₂/GC electrode is characterized by great stability, it was used for 6 weeks without significant changes in the SUM peak current. Amperometric and voltammetric measurements of SUM under the flow injection conditions were also performed to indicate the possibility of its fast and accurate determination with a time of single analysis of approx. 30 s.

Comparison between metamizole and triptans for migraine treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of metamizole and triptans for the treatment of migraine. MethodsRandomized controlled trials including people who received metamizole or triptan by multiple routes of administration and at all doses as treatment compared to subjects who received another treatment or placebo were included in the systematic review. The primary outcomes were freedom from pain at 2 hours; pain relief at 2 hours; sustained headache response at 24 hours; sustained freedom from pain at 24 hours. The statistical analysis of all interventions of interest were based on random effect models compared through a network meta-analysis. Results 209 studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. Of these, 130 had data that could be analyzed statistically. Only 3.0% provided enough information and were judged to have a low overall risk of bias for all categories evaluated; approximately 50% of the studies presented a low risk of selection bias. More than 75% of the studies presented a low risk of performance bias, and around 75% showed a low risk of detection and attrition bias. ConclusionThere is no evidence of a difference between dipyrone and any triptan for pain freedom after 2 hours of medication. Our study suggests that metamizole may be equally effective as triptans in acute migraine treatment.

The Migraine Premonitory Phase

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The premonitory phase of migraine is defined as the presence of nonpainful symptomatology occurring hours to days before the onset of headache. Symptoms can include neck stiffness, yawning, thirst, and increased frequency of micturition. Clinical recognition of these symptoms is important to ensure early and effective attack management. Further understanding of the clinical phenotype and neurobiological mediation of these symptoms is important in the advancement of therapeutics research in both acute and preventive treatments of migraine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2014, functional imaging studies have been conducted during the premonitory stage of migraine and have provided novel insights into the early neurobiology and anatomy of the earliest stage of the migraine attack. These studies have shown early involvement of subcortical brain areas including the hypothalamus, substantia nigra, dorsal pons, and various limbic cortical areas, including the anterior cingulate cortex during the premonitory phase. More recent work has revealed altered hypothalamic-brainstem functional connectivity during migraine, which starts before the onset of pain. These exciting findings have provided functional correlation of the symptoms experienced by patients and changes seen on functional brain imaging.

SUMMARY

This article focuses on the prevalence, phenotype, and proposed neurobiology of premonitory symptomatology in migraineurs as well as the scope of future research.

Targeted Acid-Sensing Ion Channel Therapies for Migraine

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are a family of ion channels, consisting of four members; ASIC1 to 4. These channels are sensitive to changes in pH and are expressed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems-including brain, spinal cord, and sensory ganglia. They have been implicated in a number of neurological conditions such as stroke and cerebral ischemia, traumatic brain injury, and epilepsy, and more recently in migraine. Their expression within areas of interest in the brain in migraine, such as the hypothalamus and PAG, their demonstrated involvement in preclinical models of meningeal afferent signaling, and their role in cortical spreading depression (the electrophysiological correlate of migraine aura), has enhanced research interest into these channels as potential therapeutic targets in migraine. Migraine is a disorder with a paucity of both acute and preventive therapies available, in which at best 50% of patients respond to available medications, and these medications often have intolerable side effects. There is therefore a great need for therapeutic development for this disabling condition. This review will summarize the understanding of the structure and CNS expression of ASICs, the mechanisms for their potential role in nociception, recent work in migraine, and areas for future research and drug development.

Comparative tolerability of treatments for acute migraine: A network meta-analysis

Introduction Migraine headache is a neurological disorder whose attacks are associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia. Treatments for migraine aim to either prevent attacks before they have started or relieve attacks (abort) after onset of symptoms and range from complementary therapies to pharmacological interventions. A number of treatment-related adverse events such as somnolence, fatigue, and chest discomfort have previously been reported in association with triptans. The comparative tolerability of available agents for the abortive treatment of migraine attacks has not yet been systematically reviewed and quantified. Methods We performed a systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis for comparative tolerability of treatments for migraine. The literature search targeted all randomized controlled trials evaluating oral abortive treatments for acute migraine over a range of available doses in adults. The primary outcomes of interest were any adverse event, treatment-related adverse events, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were fatigue, dizziness, chest discomfort, somnolence, nausea, and vomiting. Results Our search yielded 141 trials covering 15 distinct treatments. Of the triptans, sumatriptan, eletriptan, rizatriptan, zolmitriptan, and the combination treatment of sumatriptan and naproxen were associated with a statistically significant increase in odds of any adverse event or a treatment-related adverse event occurring compared with placebo. Of the non-triptans, only acetaminophen was associated with a statistically significant increase in odds of an adverse event occurring when compared with placebo. Overall, triptans were not associated with increased odds of serious adverse events occurring and the same was the case for non-triptans. For the secondary outcomes, with the exception of vomiting, all triptans except for almotriptan and frovatriptan were significantly associated with increased risk for all outcomes. Almotriptan was significantly associated with an increased risk of vomiting, whereas all other triptans yielded non-significant lower odds compared with placebo. Generally, the non-triptans were not associated with decreased tolerability for the secondary outcomes. Discussion In summary, triptans were associated with higher odds of any adverse event or a treatment-related adverse event occurring when compared to placebo and non-triptans. Non-significant results for non-triptans indicate that these treatments are comparable with one another and placebo regarding tolerability outcomes.

Emerging targets in migraine

Migraine is a common and highly disabling neurological disorder. Despite the complexity of its pathophysiology, substantial advances have been achieved over the past 20 years in its understanding, as well as the development of pharmacological treatment options. The development of serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists ("triptans") substantially improved the acute treatment of migraine attacks. However, many migraineurs do not respond satisfactorily to triptans and cardiovascular co-morbidities limit their use in a significant number of patients. As migraine is increasingly considered to be a disorder of the brain, and preclinical and clinical data indicate that the observed vasodilation is merely an epiphenomenon, research has recently focused on the development of neurally acting compounds that lack vasoconstrictor properties. This review highlights the most important pharmacological targets for which compounds have been developed that are highly likely to enter or have already advanced into clinical trials for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. In this context, preclinical and clinical data on compounds acting on calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor, the 5-HT(1F) receptor, nitric oxide synthase, and acid-sensing ion channel blockers are discussed.

Sumatriptan (oral route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a highly disabling condition for the individual and also has wide-reaching implications for society, healthcare services, and the economy. Sumatriptan is an abortive medication for migraine attacks, belonging to the triptan family.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and tolerability of oral sumatriptan compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, online databases, and reference lists for studies through 13 October 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- and/or active-controlled studies using oral sumatriptan to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used numbers of participants achieving each outcome to calculate relative risk (or 'risk ratio') and numbers needed to treat to benefit (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to placebo or a different active treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-one studies (37,250 participants) compared oral sumatriptan with placebo or an active comparator. Most of the data were for the 50 mg and 100 mg doses. Sumatriptan surpassed placebo for all efficacy outcomes. For sumatriptan 50 mg versus placebo the NNTs were 6.1, 7.5, and 4.0 for pain-free at two hours and headache relief at one and two hours, respectively. NNTs for sustained pain-free and sustained headache relief during the 24 hours postdose were 9.5 and 6.0, respectively. For sumatriptan 100 mg versus placebo the NNTs were 4.7, 6.8, 3.5, 6.5, and 5.2, respectively, for the same outcomes. Results for the 25 mg dose were similar to the 50 mg dose, while sumatriptan 100 mg was significantly better than 50 mg for pain-free and headache relief at two hours, and for sustained pain-free during 24 hours. Treating early, during the mild pain phase, gave significantly better NNTs for pain-free at two hours and sustained pain-free during 24 hours than did treating established attacks with moderate or severe pain intensity.Relief of associated symptoms, including nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia, was greater with sumatriptan than with placebo, and use of rescue medication was lower with sumatriptan than with placebo. For the most part, adverse events were transient and mild and were more common with the sumatriptan than with placebo, with a clear dose response relationship (25 mg to 100 mg).Sumatriptan was compared directly with a number of active treatments, including other triptans, paracetamol (acetaminophen), acetylsalicylic acid, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and ergotamine combinations.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Oral sumatriptan is effective as an abortive treatment for migraine attacks, relieving pain, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and functional disability, but is associated with increased adverse events.

WITHDRAWN: Oral sumatriptan for acute migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common neurovascular disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of disabling headache, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, and, in some patients, neurological aura symptoms. Sumatriptan is one of a class of selective serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1B/1D) agonists (triptans) thought to relieve migraine attacks by several mechanisms, including cranial vasoconstriction and peripheral and central neural inhibition.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and assess the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the efficacy and tolerability of oral sumatriptan for the treatment of a single acute attack of migraine in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 through November 2001), and reference lists of articles and books.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included double-blind RCTs comparing oral sumatriptan (100 mg, 50 mg, 25 mg) with placebo, no intervention, other drug treatments, behavioral therapy, or physical therapy for the treatment of an acute attack of migraine in adults. Trials comparing different doses of sumatriptan or dosing regimens were also included. Outcomes considered were: 2-hour pain-free response, headache relief/headache intensity, and functional disability; headache recurrence; and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted by one reviewer and over-read by the other. The two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. Information on adverse events was collected from trial reports.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five trials involving 16,200 participants were included. Methodological quality was generally good. Sixteen trials were placebo comparisons and showed that sumatriptan in doses of 100 mg (14 trials), 50 mg (five trials), and 25 mg (three trials) provided significantly better pain-free response (100 mg and 25 mg only), headache relief, and relief of disability at 2 hours. Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs) for pain-free response at 2 hours were 5.1 (3.9 to 7.1) for the 100-mg dose (n = 2221) and 7.5 (2.7 to 142) for the 25-mg dose (n = 131); there was no significant difference between the 50-mg dose and placebo for this outcome (n = 127). For headache relief at 2 hours, NNTs were 3.4 (3.0 to 4.0), 3.2 (2.4 to 5.1), and 3.4 (2.3 to 6.6) for sumatriptan 100 mg (n = 2940), 50 mg (n = 420), and 25 mg (n = 226), respectively. Precise estimates of the efficacy of the 50- and 25-mg doses relative to the 100-mg dose could not be obtained.Adverse events were more common with sumatriptan 100 mg than with placebo (risk difference [RD] = 0.14 [0.09 to 0.20]; number-needed-to-harm [NNH] = 7.1 [5.0 to 11.1]; n = 3172). RDs for the 50- and 25-mg vs. placebo comparisons were not statistically significant.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Oral sumatriptan has been shown to be an effective drug for the treatment of a single acute attack of migraine. It is well tolerated, though minor adverse events were not uncommon in the included trials. Other triptans were generally similar in efficacy and adverse events. Among non-triptan drugs, ergotamine + caffeine was significantly less effective than sumatriptan, and other drugs have been insufficiently studied to draw firm conclusions.

Migraine recurrence is not associated with depressive or anxiety symptoms. Results of a randomized controlled trial

In order to investigate the plausible association of migraine recurrence with anxiety and depressive symptoms, a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial was conducted using sumatriptan as a vehicle drug. Migraineurs were randomly assigned to receive either 50 mg sumatriptan or placebo for three consecutive migraine attacks, and then cross over to the other treatment for three more migraine attacks. The primary measurements were the observed rate of migraine recurrence in relation to (i) patient's mood condition, measured by the Hamilton rating scales for depression and anxiety and (ii) patient's general health and functioning measured by the Symptom Checklist (SCL)-90-R. Migraine recurrence was defined as any migrainous headache that occurred within 24 h post treatment, only when pain free at 2 h was achieved. The analysis of efficacy was performed on 376 migraine attacks treated with sumatriptan and 373 attacks treated with placebo. Recurrence ratio was 14.1% and 5.1%, respectively ( P = 0.045). The number needed to treat for pain free at 2 h post dose was 5.4. Recurrence was not affected by Hamilton scores for depression or anxiety, SCL-90-R scores or treatment. Apparently, depressive or anxiety symptoms do not influence headache recurrence in acute pharmaceutical migraine treatment, but further investigation is required.

When to Stress Over Triptans: A Markov Analysis of Cardiovascular Risk in Migraine Treatment

BACKGROUND

Migraines affect 10% of the U.S. population and the episodes are frequently associated with significant disability. Triptans, 5HT1 receptor agonists, can be highly effective in treating pain and reducing disability. However, reports of cardiac events associated with triptan ingestion have led to concerns about its use in the face of possible cardiac disease.

OBJECTIVE

Should a patient without known cardiovascular disease (CAD) and moderately severe to severe migraines undergo cardiovascular testing prior to the initiation of triptan therapy?

DESIGN

A Markov model of migraine and cardiac disease using DATA 4.0. Three strategies were compared: (1) use triptans without further evaluation (TREAT); (2) test, then treat if negative (TEST); and (3) avoid triptans (NOTRIPTAN). Triptans were prohibited if a cardiac event occurred.

DATA

Model inputs were derived from the literature and subjected to sensitivity analyses across all possible values.

TIME HORIZON

Markov cycle is 1 week.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcomes of interest were quality-adjusted life expectancy, in years (QALYs) and the impact of various cardiovascular risk levels on the preferred strategy.

RESULTS

For the base case results were TREAT 19.4 QALYs, TEST 19.2, NOTRIPTAN 19.1. When altering CAD probability: TREAT dominated from 0 to 87%, TEST 87% to 97%, and NOTRIPTAN above 97%. Results were robust during sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that even for individuals with a relatively high risk of CAD it is not beneficial to perform cardiac testing, nor to avoid triptans. The exact level of cardiac risk at which testing should be considered is probably at or above 87%.

Placebo adverse events in headache trials: headache as an adverse event of placebo

We analysed the adverse events of placebo in acute and preventive randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies for migraine treatment. Fifty-seven trials (oral triptans, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nasal ergot alkaloids and preventive agents) were included. From 10 to 30% of subjects reported adverse events after placebo. Most common were features associated with a migraine attack, such as nausea, phono- and photophobia. Other frequent complaints resembled those of the active drug (e.g. chest pressure in triptan trials). A third group of adverse events appeared to be coincidental (e.g. sleep disturbance). Adverse events following placebo are probably related to the drug under study and the symptomatology of migraine; some have no obvious explanation.

Sumatriptan plus metoclopramide in triptan-nonresponsive migraineurs

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effectiveness of combination treatment using sumatriptan plus metoclopramide versus sumatriptan alone for the treatment of acute migraine. The patients who were treated had failed to respond to triptans in the past despite adequate doses on at least 2 separate trials of the same triptan or 2 trials involving different triptans.

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence that dopaminergic antagonists may benefit the migraineur by relieving migraine pain and associated symptoms. The exact mechanism of action in migraine is unknown. The postulated action is the inhibition of dopaminergic overactivity. A dopaminergic antagonist, metoclopramide, may improve the efficacy of a 5-HT1B/1D agonist, sumatriptan.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 16 adult migraineurs fulfilling International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine with or without aura who had failed to receive adequate relief from triptans treated one migraine with each treatment: sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg or sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo to match metoclopramide. Patients treated their migraines when they were moderate or severe in intensity and recorded pain severity and symptoms prior to treatment and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after treatment.

RESULTS

Thirteen women and 3 men (mean age, 40 years) completed the study; ie, treated 2 migraines (a total of 32 migraines), one attack with each treatment. Meaningful relief was attained in 10 (63%) of 16 migraines treated with the combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg compared with 5 (31%) of 16 migraines treated with sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo. Headache response (moderate or severe to mild or no pain at 2 hours) was achieved in 7 (44%) of 16 migraines with the combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg compared with 5 (31%) of 16 migraines treated with sumatriptan 50 mg plus placebo. There did not appear to be a difference between treatment groups with respect to associated symptoms. The combination of sumatriptan 50 mg plus metoclopramide 10 mg was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining sumatriptan with metoclopramide provided relief in some migraineurs who failed to achieve adequate relief with a triptan alone. It remains unknown whether initiating therapy when pain was mild or using a higher dose of sumatriptan (ie, 100 mg) would have provided additional benefit. Further studies are indicated.

Oral sumatriptan for acute migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common neurovascular disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of disabling headache, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, and, in some patients, neurological aura symptoms. Sumatriptan is one of a class of selective serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT1B/1D) agonists (triptans) thought to relieve migraine attacks by several mechanisms, including cranial vasoconstriction and peripheral and central neural inhibition.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and assess the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the efficacy and tolerability of oral sumatriptan for the treatment of a single acute attack of migraine in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 through November 2001), and reference lists of articles and books.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included double-blind RCTs comparing oral sumatriptan (100 mg, 50 mg, 25 mg) with placebo, no intervention, other drug treatments, behavioral therapy, or physical therapy for the treatment of an acute attack of migraine in adults. Trials comparing different doses of sumatriptan or dosing regimens were also included. Outcomes considered were: 2-hour pain-free response, headache relief/headache intensity, and functional disability; headache recurrence; and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted by one reviewer and over-read by the other. The two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. Information on adverse events was collected from trial reports.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five trials involving 16,200 participants were included. Methodological quality was generally good. Sixteen trials were placebo comparisons and showed that sumatriptan in doses of 100 mg (14 trials), 50 mg (five trials), and 25 mg (three trials) provided significantly better pain-free response (100 mg and 25 mg only), headache relief, and relief of disability at 2 hours. Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs) for pain-free response at 2 hours were 5.1 (3.9 to 7.1) for the 100-mg dose (n = 2221) and 7.5 (2.7 to 142) for the 25-mg dose (n = 131); there was no significant difference between the 50-mg dose and placebo for this outcome (n = 127). For headache relief at 2 hours, NNTs were 3.4 (3.0 to 4.0), 3.2 (2.4 to 5.1), and 3.4 (2.3 to 6.6) for sumatriptan 100 mg (n = 2940), 50 mg (n = 420), and 25 mg (n = 226), respectively. Precise estimates of the efficacy of the 50- and 25-mg doses relative to the 100-mg dose could not be obtained. Adverse events were more common with sumatriptan 100 mg than with placebo (risk difference [RD] = 0.14 [0.09 to 0.20]; number-needed-to-harm [NNH] = 7.1 [5.0 to 11.1]; n = 3172). RDs for the 50- and 25-mg vs. placebo comparisons were not statistically significant.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Oral sumatriptan has been shown to be an effective drug for the treatment of a single acute attack of migraine. It is well tolerated, though minor adverse events were not uncommon in the included trials. Other triptans were generally similar in efficacy and adverse events. Among non-triptan drugs, ergotamine + caffeine was significantly less effective than sumatriptan, and other drugs have been insufficiently studied to draw firm conclusions.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of intranasal sumatriptan

A substantial proportion of migraine patients have gastric stasis and suffer severe nausea and/or vomiting during their migraine attack. This may lead to erratic absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and make oral treatment unsatisfactory. For such patients, an intranasal formulation may be advantageous. Sumatriptan is a potent serotonin 5HT(1B/1D) agonist widely used in the treatment of migraine; the effectiveness of the intranasal formulation (20mg) has been well established in several clinical studies. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics of intranasal sumatriptan and includes comparisons with oral and subcutaneous administration. After intranasal administration, sumatriptan is directly and rapidly absorbed, with 60% of the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) occurring at 30 minutes after administration of a single 20mg dose. Following intranasal administration, approximately 10% more sumatriptan is absorbed probably via the nasal mucosa when compared with oral administration. Mean C(max) after a 20mg intranasal dose is approximately 13.1 to 14.4 ng/mL, with median time to C(max) approximately 1 to 1.75 hours. When given as a single dose, intranasal sumatriptan displays dose proportionality in its extent of absorption and C(max) over the dose range 5 to 10mg, but not between 5 and 20mg for C(max). The elimination phase half-life is approximately 2 hours, consistent with administration by other routes. Sumatriptan is metabolised by monoamine oxidase (MAO; predominantly the A isozyme, MAO-A) to an inactive metabolite. Coadministration with a MAO-A inhibitor, moclobemide, leads to a significant increase in sumatriptan plasma concentrations and is contraindicated. Single-dose pharmacokinetics in paediatric and adolescent patients following intranasal sumatriptan were studied to determine the effect of changes in nasal morphology during growth, and of body size, on pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic profile observed in adults was maintained in the adolescent population; generally, factors such as age, bodyweight or height did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics. In children below 12 years, C(max) is comparable to that seen in adolescents and adults, but total exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) was lower in children compared with older patients, especially in younger children treated with 5mg. Clinical experience suggests that intranasal sumatriptan has some advantages over the tablet (more rapid onset of effect and use in patients with gastrointestinal complaints) or subcutaneous (noninvasive and fewer adverse events) formulations.

Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials

The triptans, selective serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonists, are very effective acute migraine drugs. Soon, seven different triptans will be clinically available at 13 different oral doses, making evidence-based selection guidelines necessary. Triptan trials have similar designs, facilitating meta-analysis. We wished to provide an evidence-based foundation for using triptans in clinical practice, and to review the methodological issues surrounding triptan trials. We asked pharmaceutical companies and the principal investigators of company-independent trials for the 'raw patient data' of all double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trials with oral triptans in migraine. All data were cross-checked with published or presented data. We calculated summary estimates across studies for important efficacy and tolerability parameters, and compared these with those from direct, head-to-head, comparator trials. Out of 76 eligible clinical trials, 53 (12 not yet published) involving 24089 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Mean results (and 95% confidence intervals) for sumatriptan 100 mg, the first available and most widely prescribed oral triptan, are 59% (57-60) for 2 h headache response (improvement from moderate or severe to mild or no pain); 29% (27-30) for 2 h pain free (improvement to no pain); 20% (18-21) for sustained pain free (pain free by 2 h and no headache recurrence or use of rescue medication 2-24 h post-dose), and 67% (63-70) for consistency (response in at least two out of three treated attacks); placebo-subtracted proportions for patients with at least one adverse event (AE) are 13% (8-18), for at least one central nervous system AE 6% (3-9), and for at least one chest AE 1.9% (1.0-2.7). Compared with these data: rizatriptan 10 mg shows better efficacy and consistency, and similar tolerability; eletriptan 80 mg shows better efficacy, similar consistency, but lower tolerability; almotriptan 12.5 mg shows similar efficacy at 2 h but better sustained pain-free response, consistency, and tolerability; sumatriptan 25 mg, naratriptan 2.5 mg and eletriptan 20 mg show lower efficacy and better tolerability; zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg, eletriptan 40 mg, and rizatriptan 5 mg show very similar results. The results of the 22 trials that directly compared triptans show the same overall pattern. We received no data on frovatriptan, but publicly available data suggest substantially lower efficacy. The major methodological issues involve the choice of the primary endpoint, consistency over multiple attacks, how to evaluate headache recurrence, use of placebo-subtracted proportions to control for across-study differences, and the difference between tolerability and safety. In addition, there are a number of methodological issues specific for direct comparator trials, including encapsulation and patient selection. At marketed doses, all oral triptans are effective and well tolerated. Differences among them are in general relatively small, but clinically relevant for individual patients. Rizatriptan 10 mg, eletriptan 80 mg and almotriptan 12.5 mg provide the highest likelihood of consistent success. Sumatriptan features the longest clinical experience and the widest range of formulations. All triptans are contra-indicated in the presence of cardiovascular disease.

Practical approaches to migraine management

Migraine is a recurrent clinical syndrome characterised by combinations of neurological, gastrointestinal and autonomic manifestations. The exact pathophysiological disturbances that occur with migraine have yet to be elucidated; however, cervico-trigemino-vascular dysfunctions appear to be the primary cause. Despite advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine and new effective treatment options, migraine remains an under-diagnosed, under-treated and poorly treated health condition. Most patients will unsuccessfully attempt to treat their headaches with over-the-counter medications. Few well designed, placebo-controlled studies are available to guide physicians in medication selection. Recently published evidence-based guidelines advocate migraine-specific drugs, such as serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists (the 'triptans') and dihydroergotamine mesylate, for patients experiencing moderate to severe migraine attacks. Additional headache attack therapy options include other ergotamine derivatives, phenothiazines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and opioids. Preventative medication therapy is indicated for patients experiencing frequent and/or refractory attacks.

Effects of sumatriptan on cerebral blood flow under normo- and hypercapnia in rats

To investigate further the pharmacological mechanism of an anti-migraine drug, sumatriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, we studied its effect on the cerebral circulation in seven anaesthetized rats, particularly during hypercapnia. After injection of 0.6 or 6.0 microg/kg sumatriptan succinate, no significant change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) was observed either in the striatum or in the parietal cortex. The increase in CBF both in the parietal cortex and the striatum during 5% CO2 inhalation was significantly less when sumatriptan succinate 6.0 microg/kg was injected. Sumatriptan appeared to have a vasoconstrictor effect on the relaxed vessels by CO2 inhalation. This mechanism might be attributable to vasoconstriction through activation of 5-HT1B receptors located in the vascular smooth muscle rather than 5-HT1B receptors in the vascular adventitia.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist eletriptan following intravenous and oral administration

Four separate studies were conducted to examine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of eletriptan, a 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist being developed for the treatment of migraines, after oral and intravenous administration. Fifty-five males received oral (1.5-30 mg or 30-120 mg) or intravenous (1.67-50 microg/kg or 50-102 microg/kg) eletriptan in four double- and single-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose crossover studies. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration curve (AUC) appeared linear over all dose ranges, with an apparent terminal half-life of 4 to 5 hours. Clearance and volume of distribution remained constant with dose. The time to first occurrence of Cmax (tmax) for oral eletriptan was approximately 1 hour and was unaffected by dose. Comparison of AUC values suggested an absolute bioavailability of approximately 50%. A linear PK/PD model, fitted to the data, predicted small, transient elevations in diastolic blood pressure following eletriptan doses > or = 60 mg. These effects were considered unlikely to be clinically significant. Eletriptan was well tolerated, and treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate and transient. These PK properties should result in eletriptan having a rapid onset and sustained duration of action in terms of migraine efficacy.

Intractable eye pain: indication for triptans

Management of pain is difficult in many eye diseases. Particularly in patients undergoing surgical procedures, postoperative intractable pain is a major concern and severely influences the patient's comfort. We present 13 patients (eight male, five female, mean age 36 years) in whom sumatriptan, a highly selective 5-HT1B/1D agonist that is normally used as a specific anti-migraine drug, was used for the treatment of pain following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). In two patients both eyes were operated on different days, resulting in a total of 15 operated eyes. A positive clinical response was achieved in all patients. In particular, in four patients, who received a second dose prophylactically 4 h following the first dose and before the recurrence of pain, we achieved excellent efficacy and stable control of pain. Further controlled studies are needed to investigate the usefulness of 5-HT1B/1D agonists in painful eye conditions.

How does almotriptan compare with other triptans? A review of data from placebo-controlled clinical trials

Almotriptan, the new selective 5-HT1B/1D agonist, has a higher oral bioavailability than any other triptan, with more than two thirds of the administered dose absorbed within the first hour both inside and outside of a migraine attack. Gender or the presence of food in the stomach does not affect its pharmacokinetic profile, and the compound has no clinically relevant interactions with other drugs. Among the available triptans, response rates at 2 hours range from 50% to 80%, with 20% to 50% of patients pain-free. Almotriptan 12.5 mg provides similar efficacy, with significant advantage over placebo at 30 minutes and a reliable consistency (75% in two of three attacks). Headache typically recurs in 25% to 45% of patients with most triptans. The recurrence rate with almotriptan 12.5 mg, 18% to 27%, is among the lowest reported. The tolerability of almotriptan 12.5 mg is close to that of placebo with a low incidence of central nervous system side effects and chest symptoms. In conclusion, almotriptan's consistent pharmacokinetics and good efficacy, in combination with excellent tolerability, make it an attractive choice in the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the triptan antimigraine agents: a comparative review

The current approach to antimigraine therapy comprises potent serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists collectively termed triptans. Sumatriptan was the first of these compounds to be developed, and offered improved efficacy and tolerability over ergot-derived compounds. The development of sumatriptan was quickly followed by a number of 'second generation' triptan compounds, characterised by improved pharmacokinetic properties and/or tolerability profiles. Triptans are believed to effect migraine relief by binding to serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine) receptors in the brain, where they act to induce vasoconstriction of extracerebral blood vessels and also reduce neurogenic inflammation. Although the pharmacological mechanism of the triptans is similar, their pharmacokinetic properties are distinct. For example, bioavailability of oral formulations ranges between 14% (sumatriptan) and 74% (naratriptan), and their elimination half-life ranges from 2 hours (sumatriptan and rizatriptan) to 25 hours (frovatriptan). Clearly, such diverse pharmacokinetic properties will influence the effectiveness of the compounds and favour the prescription of one over another in different patient populations. This article reviews the pharmacological properties of the triptans (time to peak plasma concentration, half-life, bioavailability and receptor binding) and relates these properties to efficacy and time of onset. It also considers the effects of concomitant medication, food, age and disease on the pharmacokinetics of the compounds. In addition, the relative merits, such as headache recurrence, tolerability and route of administration, are discussed. Finally, the performance of the triptans is considered in the context of direct head-to-head comparative trials that have assessed the efficacy profile of the compounds.

A systematic review of the use of triptans in acute migraine

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken, to consolidate evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of triptans currently available in Canada (sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, zolmitriptan), and to provide guidelines for selection of a triptan.

METHODS

Data from published, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were pooled and a combined number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) was generated for each triptan. Direct comparative trials of triptans were also examined.

RESULTS

The lowest NNT for headache response/pain-free at one/two hours is observed with subcutaneous sumatriptan. Among the oral formulations, the lowest NNT is observed with rizatriptan and the highest NNT with naratriptan. The lowest NNH is observed with subcutaneous sumatriptan.

CONCLUSIONS

Triptans are relatively safe and effective medications for acute migraine attacks. However, differences among them are relatively small. Considerations in selecting a triptan include individual patient response/tolerance, characteristics of the attacks, relief of associated symptoms, consistency of response, headache recurrence, delivery systems and patient preference.

Triptans in migraine: a comparative review of pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and efficacy

Triptans are a new class of compounds developed for the treatment of migraine attacks. The first of the class, sumatriptan, and the newer triptans (zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, eletriptan, almotriptan and frovatriptan) display high agonist activity at mainly the serotonin 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor subtypes. As expected for a class of compounds developed for affinity at a specific receptor, there are minor pharmacodynamic differences between the triptans. Sumatriptan has a low oral bioavailability (14%) and all the newer triptans have an improved oral bioavailability and for one, risatriptan, the rate of absorption is faster. The half-lives of naratriptan, eletriptan and, in particular, frovatriptan (26 to 30h) are longer than that of sumatriptan (2h). These pharmacokinetic improvements of the newer triptans so far seem to have only resulted in minor differences in their efficacy in migraine. Double-blind, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the different triptans and triptans with other medication should ideally be the basis for judging their place in migraine therapy. In only 15 of the 83 reported RCTs were 2 triptans compared, and in 11 trials triptans were compared with other drugs. Therefore, in all placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials, the relative efficacy of the triptans was also judged by calculating the therapeutic gain (i.e. percentage response for active minus percentage response for placebo). The mean therapeutic gain with subcutaneous sumatriptan 6mg (51%) was more than that for all other dosage forms of triptans (oral sumatriptan 100mg 32%; oral sumatriptan 50mg 29%: intranasal sumatriptan 20mg 30%; rectal sumatriptan 25mg 31%; oral zolmitriptan 2.5mg 32%; oral rizatriptan 10mg 37%; oral eletriptan 40mg 37%; oral almotriptan 12.5mg 26%). Compared with oral sumatriptan 100mg (32%), the mean therapeutic gain was higher with oral eletriptan 80mg (42%) but lower with oral naratriptan 2.5mg (22%) or oral frovatriptan 2.5mg (16%). The few direct comparative randomised clinical trials with oral triptans reveal the same picture. Recurrence of headache within 24 hours after an initial successful response occurs in 30 to 40% of sumatriptan-treated patients. Apart from naratriptan, which has a tendency towards less recurrence, there appears to be no consistent difference in recurrence rates between the newer triptans and sumatriptan. Rizatriptan with its shorter time to maximum concentration (tmax) tended to produce a quicker onset of headache relief than sumatriptan and zolmitriptan. The place of triptans compared with non-triptan drugs in migraine therapy remains to be established and further RCTs are required.

2000 Wolfe Award. Sumatriptan for the range of headaches in migraine sufferers: results of the Spectrum Study

BACKGROUND

Migraineurs experience a spectrum of headaches: migraine, migrainous, and episodic tension-type as defined by the International Headache Society (IHS).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of sumatriptan, 50-mg tablets, in treating the spectrum of headaches in IHS-diagnosed migraineurs.

DESIGN/METHODS

Migraineurs with severe disability (Headache Impact Questionnaire score 250 or greater) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Patients treated up to 10 headaches with sumatriptan, 50 mg, or placebo (4:1). Headache features, recorded prior to treatment, were used to classify each headache using IHS criteria. Headache response (moderate or severe pain reduced to mild or no pain) and pain-free response were recorded at 2 and 4 hours postdose (primary endpoint). Because patients treated multiple attacks, statistical methods controlling for within-subject correlation were used.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-nine migraineurs treated 1576 moderate or severe headaches: migraine (n = 1110), migrainous (n = 103), and tension-type (n = 363). Sumatriptan was superior to placebo for headache response 4 hours postdose (primary endpoint) across all headache types (migraine, 66% versus 48%; P<.001; migrainous, 71% versus 39%; P<.01; tension-type, 78% versus 50%, P<.001). Sumatriptan was also superior to placebo for pain-free response 4 hours postdose for migraine (41% versus 24%, P<.001) and tension-type headaches (56% versus 36%, P =.001). Sumatriptan provided superior pain-free response 2 hours postdose for migraine (18% versus 7%, P<.0001) and tension-type headache (28% versus 14%, P =.0005) compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Sumatriptan, 50-mg tablets, are effective for the full spectrum of headaches experienced by patients with disabling migraine due to a sumatriptan-responsive mechanism.

Therapy of Migraine Headache in Cancer Patients

This article reviews how to establish the diagnosis of migraine, the possible differential diagnoses, and the present state of the art of therapy. Emphasis is laid on nonsteroidal antiphlogistic drugs, serotonin receptor agonists (the so called triptans), and antiemetic drugs. The interval therapy consists of beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, antiepileptics, and serotonin receptor antagonists. The pathophysiology is based on the concept of sterile neurogenic inflammation, cortical spreading depression (CSD), and hyperexcitability of the central nervous system (CNS).

Comparison of naratriptan and sumatriptan in recurrence-prone migraine patients. Naratriptan International Recurrence Study Group

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, double-blind, crossover study was undertaken to compare the incidence of headache recurrence after treatment with naratriptan or sumatriptan in migraine patients with a history of frequent headache recurrence (recurrence in > or =50% of successfully treated attacks).

BACKGROUND

Although the selective 5-hydroxytryptamine, (5-HT1) agonist sumatriptan is effective and well tolerated for acute treatment of migraine in most patients, headache recurrence within 24 hours of initial successful treatment with sumatriptan and other medications has been reported in approximately 35% of patients. The novel 5-HT1 agonist naratriptan possesses pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic characteristics that may address the issue of headache recurrence.

METHODS

Men and women aged 18 to 65 years with a > or =1-year history of migraine with or without aura were randomly assigned to treat 1 moderate or severe migraine attack in a nonclinical setting with one 2.5-mg naratriptan tablet and 1 attack with one 100-mg sumatriptan tablet. A pain-free interval of > or =24 hours was required between attacks. At 4 hours, patients not using rescue medication and experiencing headache recurrence could take a second, identical dose of study medication to treat recurrence. No more than 2 tablets of study medication were permitted in any 24-hour period.

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients treated > or =1 migrane attack and were included in the safety analysis; the 225 patients who treated both attacks were included in the efficacy analysis. Of the 164 naratriptan-treated and 181 sumatriptan-treated patients experiencing headache relief after > or =1 attack, headache recurrence 4 to 24 hours after treatment was reported by 74 naratriptan-treated patients (45%) and 101 sumatriptan-treated patients (57%; not statistically significant). (One naratriptan- and 3 sumatriptan-treated patients who experienced headache relief did not record recurrence status and were not included in the denominator for the percentage calculation.) In a subset of patients experiencing headache relief after 2 attacks, headache recurrence 4 to 24 hours after initial dosing was reported by 55 naratriptan- and 77 sumatriptan-treated patients (41% and 57%, respectively; P = 0.005). The overall incidence of adverse events was 22% after treatment with naratriptan and 33% after treatment with sumatriptan. This incidence did not increase after use of a second dose of naratriptan (20%) or sumatriptan (31%).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that naratriptan is a long-acting and well-tolerated addition to currently available medications for the treatment of acute migraine.

Naratriptan efficacy in migraineurs who respond poorly to oral sumatriptan

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether 347 patients would respond to a 50-mg oral dose of sumatriptan, even though they considered themselves poor responders to this acute therapy for migraine, and to investigate whether oral naratriptan can be an effective acute therapy for migraine in the subset of patients who did not respond to sumatriptan under double-blind, well-controlled conditions.

BACKGROUND

Although most migraineurs respond to sumatriptan, there remains a need for an effective alternative for those who do not respond. Naratriptan is a more potent and more lipophilic member of this class of agent and could prove beneficial in such patients. This is the first well-controlled study to assess the value of another 5-HT1B/1D agonist in this difficult patient subset.

METHODS

This study comprised two migraine attacks. The first (attack 1) was a single-blind assessment of the efficacy of sumatriptan (50 mg orally) in patients with a history of poor response to the drug. The second (attack 2) was a randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naratriptan (2.5 mg orally) in nonresponders to oral sumatriptan.

RESULTS

Attack 1: About two thirds of this selected migraine population did not respond to sumatriptan. Attack 2: Naratriptan was statistically superior to placebo for headache relief at 2 hours and 4 hours, as well as for most other features of migraine attacks. These data suggest an intrinsic efficacy of naratriptan in this patient subset and not a coincidental response. No unexpected tolerability issues arose.

CONCLUSIONS

Naratriptan is an alternative therapy for migraineurs who respond poorly to oral sumatriptan. No response to one "triptan" does not necessarily predict no response to them all.

Use and overuse of sumatriptan. Pharmacoepidemiological studies based on prescription register and interview data

The serotonin agonist sumatriptan was marketed in Denmark in 1992 for the treatment of acute attacks of migraine and cluster headache. The clinical development program of the drug was impressive. However, knowledge of the long-term use of sumatriptan in unselected patients was lacking. Misuse of sumatriptan was reported in single patients shortly after the introduction of the drug. The aim of the present thesis was, therefore, to provide an epidemiological description of sumatriptan use with particular emphasis on overuse. The author conducted three studies, two of which were exclusively based on population-based data from a regional (Odense Pharmacoepidemiological Database) and a national (Registry of Drug Statistics, Danish Medicines Agency) prescription registry. Both registries record patient-specific information, thus enabling the conduct of longitudinal studies of drug use. The regional registry covers the county of Funen (reimbursable prescription drugs only), while the national registry records information on all prescriptions presented in the entire country. Consumption was described by means of the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) unit. One DDD of sumatriptan amounts to 100 mg orally or 6 mg subcutaneously. Subjects were classified as recipients of single or multiple prescriptions. Individuals in the latter category were characterized by the 30-day period with the most intensive dispensing of sumatriptan (peak use): low (less than 30 DDD/30 days), intermediate (30-59 DDD/30 days) and high-peak users (60 or more DDD/30 days). In 1995, 33,206 users of sumatriptan were identified in Denmark, corresponding to a 1-year period prevalence of use of 7.8 per 1,000 inhabitants (only persons aged > or = 16 years were included). A female-to-male ratio of 3.8:1 was found. Use was most common among women aged 35-54 years and was highest among 45 to 49-year-olds for both sexes. The standardized period prevalence of sumatriptan use varied regionally between the Danish counties from 6.4 to 9.6 per 1,000 inhabitants. The period prevalence of sumatriptan use in the county of Funen was highly comparable with that of the entire nation. Among the 43,389 sumatriptan users presenting prescriptions for sumatriptan in Denmark in 1994 and 1995, 507 (1.1%) and 1726 (4.0%) belonged to the high and intermediate-peak-use group, respectively. Patients belonging to these two groups were responsible for 38% of the total consumption of sumatriptan. For patients in the high-peak-use group the median span between first and last prescription was 693 days while the median quantity of sumatriptan purchased was 648 DDD. Highly comparable patterns of long-term intense sumatriptan use were found in the data from the regional registry, which covered the 27-month period after the introduction of the drug (February 1992). The register data were highly suggestive of overuse, but lacked essential information, e.g., the indication for use. A third study was therefore conducted using a combination of register and interview data. During a 14-day period, current users of sumatriptan were recruited through community pharmacies in the county of Funen. Respondents returned a signed consent form, including their unique personal identification number (CPR), allowing us to retrieve patient-specific data from the regional registry. For each respondent, all available relevant prescription data for the period 1992-96 were retrieved. Subjects were classified into high, intermediate, and low-peak-use groups according to register data from the 4-year period. The register data were used to evaluate representativity after anonymizing nonrespondent data. The response rates were 33% (7/21) in the high-peak-use group, 47% (30/64) in the intermediate-peak-use group, and 56% (196/350) in the low-peak-use group. Respondents and nonrespondents in the three groups were comparable with regard to age and use of other drugs. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Migraine polypharmacy and the tolerability of sumatriptan: a large-scale, prospective study

Polypharmacy (the prescription of more than one therapy for a single patient) and subcutaneous (s.c.) sumatriptan tolerability were prospectively studied in 12,339 migraineurs, each followed for up to 1 year. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were minimal and mirrored United States Imitrex labeling. Drug usage and compliance monitoring were automatically interfaced with prescription refill. Concomitant drugs were used by 79% of patients, with analgesics, antidepressants, and sedatives used most commonly. No adverse interactions between sumatriptan and neurological drugs were found, possibly reflecting relative inability of the former to cross the blood-brain barrier. No difference in cardiovascular adverse events was associated with oral contraceptive use, which was more common than expected. No other drug class influenced adverse event probability, although sample sizes for these comparisons was sometimes <400 patients. This study confirms the prevalence of polypharmacy in migraine, identifies the drugs used, and concludes that, on a population basis, the tolerability of s.c. sumatriptan, when used according to labeled instructions, is unaffected by these concomitant drugs.

Effective headache management. Strategies to help patients gain control over pain

A general guideline to successful treatment of headache focuses on a diagnosis that satisfies both physician and patient. Thorough history taking, patient and family education, aggressive approaches, and careful follow-up help patients reach therapeutic goals. Successful long-term therapy for headache enables patients to gain control over their symptoms with a combination of carefully selected medications and nonpharmacologic approaches.

Efficacy and adverse events of subcutaneous, oral, and intranasal sumatriptan used for migraine treatment: a systematic review based on number needed to treat

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, speed of onset, and adverse events of 6 mg subcutaneous, 100 mg oral, and 20 mg intranasal sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine attacks.

DESIGN

Systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.

DATA SOURCES

Thirty trials up to April 1997 retrieved from a systematic literature search (Medline, review papers, handsearching of journals, congress proceedings, manufacturer's database); no restriction on language.

OUTCOME PARAMETERS

Numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated for relief of headache and for adverse events (when data were available). Therapeutic gain was used to evaluate speed of onset of action.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous sumatriptan was more efficacious, combined number needed to treat 2.0 at 1 h, than oral (3.0 at 2 h) and intranasal sumatriptan (3.1 at 2 h). For adverse events, the NNT was 3.0 for subcutaneous and 8.3 for oral sumatriptan. Only limited data on adverse events for intranasal sumatriptan were available. Therapeutic gain analysis during the first 2 h showed that subcutaneous sumatriptan was the fastest-acting form of administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous sumatriptan in a dose of 6 mg is significantly more efficacious than 100 mg of oral sumatriptan, but causes more adverse events than oral sumatriptan. Subcutaneous sumatriptan is the form with the quickest onset of action. Intranasal sumatriptan has the same efficacy as oral sumatriptan and a quicker onset of action than the oral form, but with a limited therapeutic effect for the first 30 min after administration.

Substance P blockade with the potent and centrally acting antagonist GR205171 does not effect central trigeminal activity with superior sagittal sinus stimulation

The development and use of serotonin-1B/1D agonists to treat the acute attack of migraine has been a significant advance, but their vasoconstrictor effects have lead to a search for non-vasoconstrictor approaches to the management of the acute attack of migraine. One such suggested approach has been substance P (neurokinin-1) antagonists, since substance P is involved in mediating neurogenic plasma protein extravasation and has long been held to have a role in pain transmission. In this study, one such candidate compound, GR205171, a highly lipophilic potent neurokinin-1 antagonist, has been tested in a model of trigeminovascular nociception with considerable predictive value for anti-migraine activity. The superior sagittal sinus was isolated in the alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg, i.p., and 20 mg/kg, i.v., supplemented every 2 h)-anaesthetized cat. The sinus was stimulated electrically (100 V, 250 micros duration, 0.3 Hz) and neurons in the dorsal C2 spinal cord monitored using electrophysiological methods. In separate experiments, the animals were prepared for stimulation and then maintained for 24 h before stimulation and perfusion for Fos immunohistochemistry. Stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus resulted in activation of cells in the dorsal horn of C2. Cells fired with a probability of 0.7 +/- 0.1 at a latency of 10.7 +/- 0.2 ms. Administration of GR205171 (100 microg/kg, i.v.) had no effect on probability of firing or latency. Stimulation of the sinus in separate cats resulted in increased expression over control levels in the superficial laminae of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and C1/2 dorsal horns. GR205171 in the same dose had no effect upon Fos expression. Inhibition of substance P by the potent, selective and brain penetrant neurokinin-1 antagonist GR205171 had no effect upon either cell firing or Fos expression in the central trigeminal cells activated by stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus. These data and the published clinical data for other compounds suggest that neurokinin-1 blockade alone will not be an effective anti-migraine strategy. Further data will be required to assess whether neurokinin-1 antagonists will have any more general value in pain.

Serotonin inhibits trigeminal nucleus activity evoked by craniovascular stimulation through a 5HT1B/1D receptor: a central action in migraine?

The development of serotonin (5HT1B/1D) agonists as treatments for the acute attack of migraine has resulted in considerable interest in their mechanism of action and, to some extent, renewed interest in the role of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT) in the disorder. The initial synthesis of this class of compounds was predicated on the clinical observation that intravenous 5HT terminated acute attacks of migraine. In this study the superior sagittal sinus was isolated in the alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg i.p. and 20 mg/kg i.v. injection supplementary 2 hourly) anesthetized cat. The sinus was stimulated electrically (120V, 250 microsec duration, 0.3 Hz), and neurons of the trigeminocervical complex in the dorsal C2 spinal cord were monitored using electrophysiological methods. After baseline recordings in each animal, 5HT (15 microg/kg/min) was infused for 5 minutes in the presence of either vehicle (group A) or the 5HT1B/1D antagonist GR127935 (100 microg/kg i.v. injection; group B). The baseline probability of cell firing after sagittal sinus stimulation was 0.61 +/- 0.1 at a latency to the fastest peak of 11.1 +/- 0.4 msec. In group A, 5HT infusion alone had a small effect of increasing mean blood pressure (12 +/- 3 mm Hg), which in itself did not alter cell firing. In group A, 5HT alone had an inhibitory effect on evoked trigeminal activity, which developed 15 to 20 minutes after commencement of the infusion. The inhibition of cell firing lasted for 20 minutes, after which the activity returned to baseline. In group B, the combination of 5HT and GR127935 had no effect on trigeminal cell firing, although the small hypertensive effect was still present. These data indicate that 5HT inhibits evoked trigeminal nucleus firing via the 5HT1B/1D receptor at which GR127935 is an antagonist. It is likely that some part of the effect of 5HT in migraine relates to inhibition of trigeminal nucleus activity, just as it is likely that some part of the effect of the triptans is also mediated at this central site and may be complementary to their nonneuronal actions. Moreover, the data highlight the case for describing this class of headache as neurovascular headaches rather than vascular headaches, to recognize the implicit contribution of the trigeminovascular system to their pathophysiology.

Plasma protein extravasation induced in the rat dura mater by stimulation of the parasympathetic sphenopalatine ganglion

It has been proposed that migraine could result from a neurogenic inflammation of the dura mater. According to this theory, inflammation could be initiated by an axon reflex of nociceptive nerve fibers, but the trigger of this axon reflex remains poorly understood. Previous works have shown that parasympathetic agonists can activate mast cells and/or sensory C-fibers, inducing pain and inflammation. The aim of the present work was to determine whether the activation of intracranial parasympathetic nerve fibers could trigger an inflammatory mechanism within the rat dura mater. Activation of the intracranial parasympathetic system was achieved by electrical stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG). The development of a neurogenic inflammation was estimated either by microscopic examination or by quantitative measurement of plasma protein extravasation (PPE) in the dura. To determine the respective roles of the parasympathetic and sensory innervations, two groups of rats were pretreated either with atropine or with capsaicin. Stimulation of the SPG induced a PPE increase of about 200% in the stimulated side on the dura mater. Extravasated material was mainly concentrated around small blood vessels. This extravasation was significantly reduced by capsaicin pretreatment and completely abolished by atropine. Infusion of carbachol in the common carotid artery induced PPE in the ipsilateral dura comparable to that induced by electrical stimulation of the SPG. This extravasation was also blocked by atropine infusion. These data indicate for the first time that the parasympathetic nervous system can trigger a neurogenic inflammation in the dura via muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Sensory C-fibers seem to play a role in this phenomenon. With respect to the potential autonomic imbalance described in the etiology of various types of vascular headaches, such a mechanism could be important in inducing attacks.

Genetic epidemiology of migraine and cluster headache

Migraine. The present genetic epidemiological survey of migraine was based on semi-structured interviews by a physician. The operational diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society were used. Three thousand males and 1,000 females aged 40 were drawn from the Danish National Central Person Registry. They received a questionnaire by post regarding migraine and the response rate was 87%. People with self-reported migraine and a random sample reporting no migraine were invited to a headache interview and physical and neurological examination. Those not reacting to the invitation were interviewed by telephone. The participation of the interview was 87%. Kappa was 0.77 validating self-reported migraine against a clinical interview by a physician. Non-responders did not differ from responders regarding migraine. The lifetime prevalence of MO and MA was 9.3% and 6.3% in males and 20.1% and 9.6% in females. People with MA were included as probands in the family study. An equivalent number of probands with MO and probands who had never had migraine were random samples of the people with MO) and those who had never had migraine, respectively. First-degree relatives and spouses were interviewed blindly by a physician. The 378 probands had 1,109 first-degree relatives and 229 spouses. Compared with the general population, the first-degree relatives of probands with MO had a 1.9-fold increased risk of MO and a 1.4-fold increased risk of MA, after standardization for sex and age. The first-degree relatives of probands with MA had a 3.8-fold increased risk of MA and no increased risk of MO. The first-degree relatives of probands who had never had migraine had no increased risk of either MO or MA. Spouses to pro-bands with MC) had a 1.5-fold increased risk of MO, while spouses to probands with MA had no increased risk of MA. The familial patterns indicate that MO and MA are distinct entities. The familial occurrence suggests that MO is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, while MA is determined mainly or exclusively by genetic factors. The complex segregation analysis supports the importance of genetic factors and suggests multifactorial inheritance without generational difference in both MO and MA, but genetic heterogeneity cannot be excluded.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan in healthy subjects following ascending single intranasal doses and multiple intranasal doses

The delivery of sumatriptan doses intranasally could add greater flexibility in the treatment of migraine than is possible with the currently available subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan preparations. Two independent double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of intranasally administered sumatriptan following ascending single doses (three different dose levels) and multiple doses. In the four-way, crossover, ascending-dose study, 20 healthy female subjects were randomized to receive on separate occasions single intranasal spray doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg sumatriptan (as the hemisulphate salt) or placebo into one nostril. Adverse events were mild and consisted mainly of bitter taste at the back of the throat and events typical of sumatriptan administered by other routes (headache, lightheadedness and tingling). Area under the plasma sumatriptan concentration versus time curve (AUC infinity) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) increased with the dose. Dose proportionality was demonstrated between 5 and 10 mg but not across the dose range 5-20 mg. Time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was variable due to multiple peaking. The elimination half-life (t1/2), approximately 2 h, was unaffected by the magnitude of dose. In the two-period, multiple-dose, crossover study, 12 healthy adult male and female subjects were randomized to receive either sumatriptan hemisulphate 20 mg or placebo, administered intranasally as a spray three times a day for 4 days. The two dosing periods were separated by 3 to 14 days. Multiple doses of sumatriptan were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events occurring or withdrawals due to adverse events. All patients reported a mild to moderate drug-related disturbance of taste. Nasal examinations remained normal, and olfactory function was unaffected. The AUC over the first 8 h following dosing (AUC8) and fraction of the dose excreted in the urine (fe; 6.2% vs 3.6%) were similar on Days 1 and 4. Day 4 values were significantly higher (p < or = 0.05) for Cmax (16.9 ng/ml vs 13.1 ng/ml), renal clearance (Clr; 19.0 l/h vs 14.2 l/h), and t1/2 (2.18 h vs 1.93 h), and shorter for tmax (0.88 h vs 1.75 h). Some accumulation (22%) occurred over the 4 days of dosing. Serum concentrations of the pharmacologically inactive indole acetic acid metabolite of sumatriptan were fourfold to fivefold higher than corresponding sumatriptan concentrations. Overall, these studies show that the sumatriptan intranasal spray formulation is well tolerated, allows rapid absorption of sumatriptan, and results in only a clinically insignificant degree of sumatriptan accumulation upon repeated dosing.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan suppositories following single and multiple doses in healthy volunteers

A suppository formulation of the 5HT1 agonist sumatriptan could prove an important therapeutic option in migraine patients who dislike or poorly tolerate injectable therapy and where oral tablet administration is unsuitable because of severe migraine-related vomiting. Two independent double-blind, randomized clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan suppositories following ascending single doses (four different dose levels) and multiple doses. In the four-period, crossover, single-dose study, 24 healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a suppository containing 12.5, 25, 50, or 100 mg on separate occasions 3-14 days apart. The suppositories were generally well tolerated; transient asthenia, drowsiness, and headache were the most frequently reported adverse events, and these were not dose-related. Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of sumatriptan were proportional to dose from 25 to 100 mg; area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC infinity) values were proportional to dose except at the highest doses, when they were greater than those predicted from lower doses. For all doses, the tmax of sumatriptan occurred within 2.5 h, and the t1/2 was approximately 2 h. In the two-period, placebo-controlled, crossover, repeat-dose study, 12 healthy adult male subjects were randomized to receive either a 50-mg sumatriptan suppository or placebo suppository, administered rectally twice a day, for 11 doses (5 1/2 days). Adverse events were no more frequent with sumatriptan than with placebo, and stool guaiac, rectal examinations, and physical examinations remained normal. No significant differences were noted between Day 1 and Day 6 values in the AUC, Cmax, time of peak serum concentration (tmax), elimination half-life (t 1/2), fraction of the dose excreted in the urine (fe), or renal clearance (Clr) of sumatriptan or its pharmacologically inactive indole acetic acid metabolite. Serum metabolite concentrations were two to three-fold higher than corresponding sumatriptan concentrations. No clinically significant accumulation of sumatriptan or its metabolite occurred. Overall, these studies show that sumatriptan administration via a suppository formulation is well tolerated, allows rapid absorption of sumatriptan, results in sumatriptan Cmax values that are proportional to dose from 25 to 100 mg, and is not associated with accumulation of sumatriptan or its metabolite.

Direct evidence for central sites of action of zolmitriptan (311C90): an autoradiographic study in cat

The trigeminovascular system consists of bipolar neurons which innervate pain-sensitive intracranial structures and projecting to neurons in the superficial laminae of the caudal trigeminal nucleus and of the dorsal horns of C1 and C2. The serotonin (5HT1B/D) agonist zolmitriptan (311C90) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute attacks of migraine and experimental data suggest that it may have both peripheral and central sites of action. This study sought to further investigate possible central effects of zolmitriptan (311C90) by examining its distribution in the central nervous system. Specific binding of [3H]-zolmitriptan was determined both ex vivo and in vitro in the cat brain. For the ex vivo studies, cats were anaesthetized with halothane and alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg intraperitoneal). A femoral vein catheter was inserted for injection of the [3H]-zolmitriptan and then 1 h after injection the brain removed. For the in vitro studies fresh frozen brain slices were incubated with labelled and masking concentrations of zolmitriptan. The distribution of [3H]-zolmitriptan was determined using quantitative autoradiographic methods. The in vitro work demonstrated specific binding of [3H]-zolmitriptan in the superficial laminae of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and dorsal horns of the C1 and C2 cervical spinal cord. The density of binding was 53 +/- 9 fmol/mg for the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, 47 +/- 7 fmol/mg for C1 and 50 +/- 6 fmol/mg for C2. The ex vivo work demonstrated binding in anatomically identical areas which was less dense than that seen with the in vitro method. These data confirm the existence of a population of receptors that specifically bind zolmitriptan following systemic administration. These receptors may, in part, be responsible for its clinical efficacy and reinforce the importance of central trigeminal neurons as a possible site of action of anti-migraine drugs.

Serotonin 1D (5-HT1D) agonists and other agents in acute migraine

This article discusses the use of serotonin1D agonists in the treatment of acute migraine. Specifically, the author reviews the efficacy and safety of this class of drugs with sumatriptan as the main focus. Agents under clinical trial are also discussed. Recurrence of migraine, long-term usage, and side effects of serotonin1D agonists are included in the review. The article also discusses alternative medications, such as intranasal lidocraine, intravenous chlorpromazine, and intravenous prochlorperazine, for acute treatment of migraine. The limited role of narcotics and sedatives is also mentioned.

Initial human experience with MK-462 (rizatriptan): a novel 5-HT1D agonist

AIMS

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral MK-462 in comparison with oral sumatriptan in healthy male volunteers.

METHODS

Sixteen healthy male volunteers were studied in a rising, single dose, alternating panel design with eight subjects per panel. Matching placebo was administered to two of eight study subjects at each dose level of MK-462 in a randomized, double-blind fashion.

RESULTS

MK-462 was rapidly absorbed with a median tmax of 1.3 h (range 1-3 h) vs a tmax for sumatriptan of 2.5 h (range 1-4 h, P < 0.001). Administration of either MK-462 or sumatriptan produced maximal mean elevations of 5-10 mmHg in systolic and diastolic blood pressures without effect on heart rate; the changes occurred sooner following MK-462, consistent with more rapid absorption. Both MK-462 and sumatriptan provoked mild increases in serum growth hormone without any effect on serum prolactin concentrations. The most commonly reported symptom following MK-462 was drowsiness.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the novel 5-HT1D agonist, MK-462, is rapidly absorbed following oral administration and warrants further investigation of its utility in the treatment of acute migraine.