Pseudophaeochromocytoma in parkinsonian patient treated with fluoxetine plus selegiline

Interaction between Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors are used to treat the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease. Depression is commonly associated with Parkinson disease, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often used for its management. Tertiary sources warn that the combination of MAO-B inhibitors and SSRIs can result in increased serotonergic effects, leading to serotonin syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the mechanism, clinical significance, and management of this potential drug interaction through a review of the supporting evidence.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE (1946 forward), Embase (1947 forward), PsycINFO (1806 forward), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 forward) were searched on February 4, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies and case reports describing aspects of the potential interaction between MAO-B inhibitors and SSRIs in patients with Parkinson disease and published in English were identified by both title and abstract.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The search identified 8 studies evaluating the potential interaction between SSRIs and the MAO-B inhibitors selegiline and rasagiline. The largest, a retrospective cohort study of 1504 patients with Parkinson disease, found no cases of serotonin syndrome with coadministration of rasagiline and an SSRI. A survey of 63 investigators in the Parkinson Study Group identified 11 potential cases of serotonin syndrome among 4568 patients treated with the combination of selegiline and antidepressants (including SSRIs). In addition, 17 case reports describing the onset of serotonin syndrome with coadministration of an SSRI and either selegiline or rasagiline were identified. Following discontinuation or dose reduction of one or both of the agents, the symptoms of serotonin syndrome gradually resolved in most cases, with none being fatal.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the literature, serotonin syndrome occurs rarely, and the combination of SSRI and MAO-B inhibitor is well tolerated. Therefore, SSRIs and MAO-B inhibitors can be coadministered, provided that their recommended doses are not exceeded and the SSRI dose is kept at the lower end of the therapeutic range. Among the SSRIs, citalopram and sertraline may be preferred.

Levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease: influence on liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric-based measurements of plasma and urinary normetanephrine, metanephrine and methoxytyramine

BACKGROUND

Medication-related interferences with measurements of catecholamines and their metabolites represent important causes of false-positive results during diagnosis of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Such interferences are less troublesome with measurements by liquid chromatography with tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) than by other methods, but can still present problems for some drugs. Levodopa, the precursor for dopamine used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, represents one potentially interfering medication.

METHODS

Plasma and urine samples, obtained from 20 Parkinsonian patients receiving levodopa, were analysed for concentrations of catecholamines and their O-methylated metabolites by LC-MS/MS. Results were compared with those from a group of 120 age-matched subjects and 18 patients with PPGLs.

RESULTS

Plasma and urinary free and deconjugated (free + conjugated) methoxytyramine, as well as urinary dopamine, showed 22- to 148-fold higher (P < 0.0001) concentrations in patients receiving levodopa than in the reference group. In contrast, plasma normetanephrine, urinary noradrenaline and urinary free and deconjugated normetanephrine concentrations were unaffected. Plasma free metanephrine, urinary adrenaline and urinary free and deconjugated metanephrine all showed higher (P < 0.05) concentrations in Parkinsonian patients than the reference group, but this was only a problem for adrenaline. Similar to normetanephrine, plasma and urinary metanephrine remained below the 97.5 percentiles of the reference group in almost all Parkinsonian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data establish that although levodopa treatment confounds identification of PPGLs that produce dopamine, the therapy is not a problem for use of LC-MS/MS measurements of plasma and urinary normetanephrine and metanephrine to diagnose more commonly encountered PPGLs that produce noradrenaline or adrenaline.

Serotonin toxicity caused by moclobemide too soon after paroxetine-selegiline

Serotonin toxicity is an iatrogenic complication of serotonergic drug therapy. It is due to an overstimulation of central and peripheral serotonin receptors that lead to neuromuscular, mental and autonomic changes. Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A, selegiline is an irreversible selective inhibitor of MAO-B, and paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Combined use of these agents is known to cause serotonin toxicity. A 53-year-old woman had been treated with paroxetine and selegiline. After moclobemide was prescribed in place of paroxetine without a washout period, she quickly developed confusion, agitation, ataxia, diaphoresis, tremor, mydriasis, ocular clonus, hyperreflexia, tachycardia, moderately elevated blood pressure and high fever, symptoms that were consistent with serotonin toxicity. Discontinuation of the drugs, hydration and supportive care were followed by remarkable improvement of baseline status within 3 days. This case demonstrates that serotonin toxicity may occur even with small doses of paroxetine, selegiline and moclobemide in combination. Physicians managing patients with depression must be aware of the potential for serotonin toxicity and should be able to recognize and treat or, ideally, anticipate and avoid this pharmacodynamically-mediated interaction that may occur between prescribed drugs.

Systematic overview of drug interactions with antidepressant medications

OBJECTIVE

Antidepressants are commonly used drugs with potential for numerous drug interactions. This study aims to systematically review the literature on drug interactions with antidepressants.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to November 2003) and EMBASE (1980 to 2003), using the heading drug interactions combined with individual antidepressant names. We restricted searches to English-language articles and human studies. We screened drug interaction texts and review articles for relevant studies. We included articles reporting original human data on drug interactions with antidepressants commonly used in North America. Articles were independently evaluated by 2 reviewers on clinical effect, clinical significance, and quality of evidence. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

There were 904 eligible interactions, involving 9509 patients, for a total of 598 summary interactions. Of these, 439 (73%) demonstrated an interaction, 148 (25%) had no effect, and 11 (2%) had conflicting evidence. For 510 interactions (85%), the quality of evidence was poor. It was fair for 67 (11%) interactions and good for 10 (2%) interactions. There were no interactions with excellent quality of evidence. There were 145 (24%) interactions of major clinical significance. These were predominantly hypertensive emergencies and serotonin syndrome. Most interacting drugs had central nervous system (CNS) activity. As expected, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) appear to be the most problematic family in terms of potential for serious drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug interactions with antidepressants are an important cause for concern, but this concern is based primarily on poor evidence. We recommend caution when combining antidepressants with other CNS drugs, particularly when coadministering MAOIs with other substances.

Obstructive sleep apnea presenting as pseudopheochromocytoma: a case report

Sudden arousal from sleep causes a transient surge in sympathetic nervous activity. Repeated arousals, as occur in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), are well documented to cause a more prolonged sympathetic overactivity and consequent elevations in 24-h urinary catecholamine levels. We describe here a series of five patients, each presenting with a clinical and biochemical picture indistinguishable from that of pheochromocytoma. Thorough investigations have failed to find catecholamine-secreting tumor in any of these subjects, but all have been diagnosed with OSA. Primary treatment of OSA with nasal continuous positive airways pressure has led to normalization of systemic blood pressure and urinary catecholamines. Pseudopheochromocytoma is therefore a rare, but treatable, presentation of obstructive sleep apnea.

S-Adenosyl-Methionine improves depression in patients with Parkinson's disease in an open-label clinical trial

We report a pilot study of S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) in 13 depressed patients with Parkinson's disease. All patients had been previously treated with other antidepressant agents and had no significant benefit or had intolerable side effects. SAM was administered in doses of 800 to 3600 mg per day for a period of 10 weeks. Eleven patients completed the study, and 10 had at least a 50% improvement on the 17-point Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS). One patient did not improve. Two patients prematurely terminated participation in the study because of increased anxiety. One patient experienced mild nausea, and another two patients developed mild diarrhea, which resolved spontaneously. The mean HDS score before treatment was 27.09 +/- 6.04 (mean +/- standard deviation) and was 9.55 +/- 7.29 after SAM treatment (p < 0.0001). Although uncontrolled and preliminary, this study suggests that SAM is well tolerated and may be a safe and effective alternative to the antidepressant agents currently used in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Fluoxetine-induced pressor response in freely moving rats: a role for vasopressin and sympathetic tone

The present study was performed in order to assess, in freely moving rats, the cardiovascular effects of central administration of fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Two kinds of experiments were performed: 1) acute central administration of fluoxetine. and 2) chronic intraperitoneal administration of fluoxetine plus selegiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of fluoxetine (5-50 microg) induced an increase in blood pressure. This fluoxetine-induced pressor response reached its maximal 1 hour after injection without any significant change in heart rate. At the dose of 10 microg i.c.v., fluoxetine significantly increased mean blood pressure by 16 +/- 4 mmHg. This pressor response was reduced by an intravenous (i.v.) pretreatment with the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (500 microg kg(-1)) (+ 7 +/- 4 mmHg, P <0.05) or with the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist (20 microg kg(-1)) (+5 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). The pressor response was completely abolished by a concomitant pretreatment with prazosin plus the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist. Pretreatment with the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol (1 mg kg(-1) i.v.), or the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserine (5 mg kg(-1) i.v.), did not modify the fluoxetine-induced pressor response. In freely moving rats receiving fluoxetine (10 microg i.c.v.), vasopressin plasma levels were significantly higher (39 +/- 5 pg mL(-1) than in rats receiving 10 microL i.c.v. saline (14 +/- 4 pg mL(-1)). A 30 day intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of fluoxetine in association with selegiline induced an increase in noradrenaline plasma levels and locomotor activity without any significant change in blood pressure and heart rate. These data suggest that, the pressor response elicited by central acute administration of fluoxetine is mediated by both an increase in sympathetic tone and vasopressin release. This observation could suggest the putative interest of alpha1-adrenoceptor and or V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonists in the treatment of "Serotonin Syndrome".

Serotonin syndrome: history and risk

This review focuses on the history of investigations into the behavioural reaction resulting from excess stimulation of post-synaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors and the relative risk of this occurring with different combinations of drugs. Other aspects, particularly treatment with 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists, are reviewed in a recent separate paper [44]. The first human case was in 1955 and animal work had defined the characteristic features by 1958, and established they were lessened by chlorpromazine. Substantial evidence of a 'dose-effect' relationship existed by 1984. The relative risk with different drug combinations is assessed from available evidence and argued to be strongly associated with the degree of elevation of 5-hydroxytryptamine, which is greatest following combinations of irreversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A and B with potent serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The various serotonergic drugs that may be implicated in serotonin syndrome are tabulated and discussed in relation to the relative risk. It is suggested that the proposed 'diagnostic criteria' for serotonin syndrome are inappropriate since there is a continuous spectrum from side effects to toxicity. The term 'serotonin syndrome' may encourage the presumption that it is an idiosyncratic response, as neuroleptic malignant syndrome is usually considered to be. The terms 'toxic serotomimetic reaction' or 'toxic serotonin syndrome' may be preferable alternatives. The differences between serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome are highlighted with examples from difficult or questionable cases in the recent literature. It is proposed that more systematic national collection of toxicity data is essential in order to quantify the relative risk of serotonin syndrome with various combinations of serotonergic drugs.

Fluoxetine in orthostatic hypotension of Parkinson's disease: a clinical and experimental pilot study

Recent clinical studies have reported a beneficial effect of fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in patients with severe refractory orthostatic hypotension. The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of fluoxetine in orthostatic hypotension occurring during Parkinson's disease on both blood pressure values and number of clinical symptoms during orthostatic procedure evaluated using a validated clinical rating scale. In a pilot study performed in fourteen patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease plus orthostatic hypotension, fluoxetine hydrochloride (20 mg orally daily during one month) significantly reduced the fall in systolic blood pressure [-33 +/- 21 (SD) mmHg before fluoxetine vs -22 +/- 19 mmHg after fluoxetine, P = 0.03] elicited by standing without modifying heart rate. The drug also significantly reduced the number of postural symptoms occurring during the orthostatic procedure [2.9 +/- 1.5 (SD) before fluoxetine vs 1.2 +/- 1.3 after fluoxetine, P = 0.006]. A similar pattern of response was obtained in an experimental model of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension obtained in chronically sino-aortic denervated dogs submitted to an 80 degrees head-up tilt test procedure under chloralose anaesthesia. Fluoxetine did not change plasma noradrenaline levels. This pilot study suggests a slight but clinically significant effect of fluoxetine on both hemodynamic parameters and clinical symptoms in parkinsonian patients suffering from orthostatic hypotension.

Antiparkinsonian Agents : Clinically Significant Drug Interactions and Adverse Effects, and Their Management

The treatment of Parkinson's disease for most patients entails long term exposure to multiple agents, including anticholinergics, levodopa, amantadine, dopamine receptor agonists, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, selegiline (deprenyl) and clozapine. Patients with Parkinson's disease require medication for the control of the motor symptoms of their condition, for related medical or psychiatric symptoms of the disorder, and for concurrent medical problems, such as hypertension or cardiac disease.All these agents may cause adverse effects. There is a potential for drug-drug interactions between different antiparkinsonian agents and between antiparkinsonian medication and the other drugs a patient may be taking. Clinicians caring for patients with Parkinson's disease must be knowledgable about the potential adverse effects and drug interactions of an expanding array of medications for this condition.

Sertraline for the treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease

Although antidepressant medications are commonly used to treat depression in Parkinson's disease (PD), little information is available regarding their safety and efficacy in this condition. Sertraline is a relatively selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with some dopamine reuptake inhibitor activity. It has a favorable tolerability profile, especially in the elderly. We undertook an open-label pilot evaluation of the safety and efficacy of sertraline to treat depression in PD. A total of 15 patients with PD and depression participated in the study. Sertraline was introduced at a daily dose of 25 mg for 1 week and then increased to 50 mg/day. Patients underwent evaluation at baseline and at a final visit approximately 7 weeks later. Sertraline was generally well tolerated, but five patients experienced side effects, and two discontinued medication. Patients taking selegiline experienced more adverse effects. Beck Depression Inventory scores improved significantly (mean +/- SE = 16.0 +/- 2.0 vs 11.7 +/- 1.9, p = 0.03), and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and energy-level scores were unchanged. These results suggest that sertraline may be a useful treatment for depression in PD. As substantial placebo effects can occur in studies of PD and depression, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies are warranted.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced serotonin syndrome: review

The selective pharmacology of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) results in a lower potential for pharmacodynamic drug interactions relative to other antidepressants such as the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). However, the SSRIs have been implicated in the development of the serotonin syndrome--a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment with psychotropic drugs. The syndrome is produced most often by the concurrent use of two or more drugs that enhance central nervous system serotonin activity and often goes unrecognized because of the varied and nonspecific nature of its clinical features. The serotonin syndrome is characterized by alterations in cognition (disorientation, confusion), behavior (agitation, restlessness), autonomic nervous system function (fever, shivering, diaphoresis, diarrhea), and neuromuscular (ataxia, hyperreflexia, myoclonus) activity. The difference between this syndrome and the occurrence of adverse effects caused by serotonin reuptake inhibitors alone is the clustering of the signs and symptoms, their severity, and their duration. There are important pharmacokinetic interactions between SSRIs and other serotonergic drugs due principally to their effects on the cytochrome P450(CYP) isoenzymes, the potential for which varies widely amongst the SSRI group, which may increase the likelihood of a pharmacodynamic interaction. The exceptionally long washout period required after fluoxetine discontinuation may cause additional problems and/or inconvenience. Patients with serotonin syndrome usually respond to discontinuation of drug therapy and supportive care alone, but they may also require treatment with antiserotonergic agent such as cyproheptadine, methysergide, and/or propranolol. To reduce the occurrence, morbidity, and mortality of the serotonin syndrome, it must be both prevented by prudent pharmacotherapy and given prompt recognition when it is present.

Neuropsychiatric adverse effects of antiparkinsonian drugs. Characteristics, evaluation and treatment

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurological condition that causes considerable disability in the elderly. Drugs used to treat PD, such as levodopa, offer symptomatic relief but often have neuropsychiatric adverse effects, most prominently psychosis and delirium. Aged patients and those with dementia are particularly vulnerable to these adverse effects. Evaluating PD patients with drug-induced neuropsychiatric adverse effects is made difficult by their complex clinical presentations. The treatment of drug-induced psychosis and delirium begins with manipulating the antiparkinsonian drug regimen, but this frequently worsens motor function. Atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine have been successfully employed to treat the psychosis without worsening the motor disability. Patient intolerance of clozapine therapy has prompted open-label studies with newer agents such as risperidone, remoxipride, zotepine, mianserin and ondansetron.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

The current symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease mainly relies on agents which are able to restore dopaminergic transmission in the nigrostriatal pathway, such as the dopamine precursor levodopa or direct agonists of dopamine receptors. Ancillary strategies include the use of anticholinergic and antiglutamatergic agents or inhibitors of cerebral dopamine catabolism, such as monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors. Levodopa is the most widely used and effective drug. Its peculiar pharmacokinetics are characterised by an extensive presystemic metabolism, overcome by the combined use of extracerebral inhibitors of the enzyme aromatic-amino acid decarboxylase and rapid adsorption in the proximal small bowel by a saturable facilitated transport system shared with other large neutral amino acids. Drug transport from plasma to the brain is mediated by the same carriers operating in the intestinal mucosa. The main strategies to assure reproducibility of both drug intestinal absorption and delivery to the brain and clinical effect include standardisation of levodopa administration with respect to meal times and a controlled dietary protein intake. The levodopa plasma half-life is very short, resulting in marked plasma drug concentration fluctuations which are matched, as the disease progresses, with swings in the therapeutic response ('wearing-off' phenomena). 'Wearing-off' phenomena can be also associated, at the more advanced disease stages with a 'negative', both parkinsonism-exacerbating and dyskinetic effect of levodopa at subtherapeutic plasma concentrations. Dyskinesias may be also related to high-levodopa, excessive plasma concentrations. Recognition of the different levodopa toxic response patterns can be difficult on a clinical basis alone, and simultaneous monitoring of levodopa concentration-effect relationships may prove useful to disclose the underlying mechanism and in planning the correct pharmacokinetic management. Controlled-release levodopa formulations have been developed in an attempt to smooth out fluctuations in plasma profiles and matched therapeutic responses. The delayed levodopa absorption and lower plasma concentrations which characterise controlled-release formulations compared with standard forms must be taken into account when prescribing dosage regimens and can be complicating factors in the management of the advanced disease stages. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterisation of the other antiparkinsonian agents is hampered by the lack of sensitive and specific analytical methods to measure their very low plasma drug concentrations and by the difficulty in quantitatively assessing overall moderate drug clinical effects. In clinical practice an optimal dosage schedule is still generally found for each patient on an empirical basis. Future strategies should focus on the search for pharmacological agents with a better kinetic profile, particularly a higher and reproducible bioavailability and a predictable relationship between plasma drug concentration and clinical response. Treatments aimed not only at controlling the symptoms, but also at slowing the neurodegenerative process, are currently under intensive investigation.

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. An update on drug interactions

After initial enthusiasm, the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) has been limited by the wide range of MAOI-drug and MAOI-food interactions that are possible, particularly with sympathomimetic medications or tyramine-containing foods, resulting in hypertensive reactions. Despite their clinical benefits, this has led to a reduction in use of such medications. Discovery of the 2 main subgroups of monoamine oxidase, types A and B, led to the synthesis of MAOIs selective for one or other of these isoenzymes. Consequently, selegiline (deprenyl), a selective MAO-B inhibitor, was developed for the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. This drug is useful in the treatment of the early stages of the disease and later on as an adjunct to other drug therapies. Although the selective MAO-A inhibitor, clorgiline (clorgyline), was found to be effective in the treatment of depression, it still retained the potential to cause hypertensive reactions. Recently, agents that are not only selective, but reversible in their inhibition of MAO-A (RIMAs) have been synthesised (e.g. moclobemide and toloxatone), and have proven antidepressant efficacy. Whilst they are less likely to induce hypertensive reactions with the concomitant administration of sympathomimetic drugs or with tyramine-rich foodstuffs, it still seems wise to advocate care in co-prescribing potentially interacting medications and to advise a degree of caution with regard to the dietary intake of foodstuffs likely to contain a high tyramine content. Although these newer drugs represent an advance in safety, their use has, as yet, only been established in the treatment of depression. RIMAs also retain a potential for adverse interaction with other drugs. Concomitant prescription of serotonin-enhancing drugs should only be undertaken with caution for patients on moclobemide, toloxatone or selegiline. Coprescription of sympathomimetic drugs should also be avoided with these newer MAOIs and patients should be advised against purchasing over-the-counter preparations that may contain sympathomimetic drugs.

[Serotonin syndrome in acute poisoning with antidepressive agents]

We report a case of severe serotonin syndrome after self-poisoning with two antidepressant drugs, paroxetine (a selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake) and moclobemide (a reversible inhibitor of MAO-A). The serotonin syndrome is characterized by neuromuscular, behavioural, and autonomic changes. It occurs with the use of drugs able to increase serotonergic transmission in brain by acting on biosynthesis, reuptake, catabolism or release of serotonin. Treatment is symptomatic. The incidence of severe cases seems to have increased, probably due to the use of new antidepressant "specific" inhibitors of the serotonin reuptake.

Pseudo-phaeochromocytoma after multiple drug interactions involving the selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor selegiline

A patient presented with paroxysmal hypertension and typical clinical features of phaeochromocytoma, but with a normal adrenal computed tomographic scan and much higher plasma noradrenaline than adrenaline concentrations. Urinary vanillylmandelic acid concentrations were only moderately elevated. This syndrome probably arose as a consequence of an interaction between the monoamine oxidase inhibitor selegiline, the sympathomimetic agent ephedrine, and a tricyclic antidepressant. The mechanism of the interaction is thought to be related to increased sympathetic release of noradrenaline by ephedrine, inhibition of catabolism by selegiline, and inhibition of reuptake of noradrenaline by the tricyclic. Although newer selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors are considered to be safer than earlier non-selective inhibitors, they can also contribute to drug interactions mimicking phaeochromocytoma.

Fluoxetine and selegiline--lack of significant interaction

The use of the combination of fluoxetine, an anti-depressant serotonin uptake inhibitor, and selegiline, a monoamine oxidase -B inhibitor, was reviewed in a large population of patients with Parkinson's disease. All records were reviewed from a Parkinson's disease clinic to determine how many patients were treated simultaneously with selegiline and fluoxetine. Patient characteristics, duration and dose of treatment, side effects and reasons for discontinuation were noted. Twenty-three patients received both medications at the same time. No additional side effects were noted with the combination therapy that had not already been reported with each medication alone. No serious side effects were found. In this clinic population, fluoxetine and selegiline were used in combination without major side effects, but further observation is warranted.