An automated method to analyze vocalization of unrestrained rats submitted to noxious electrical stimuli

Research Progress on Main Symptoms of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Improved by Traditional Chinese Medicine

Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia has become a major threat to worldwide public health, having rapidly spread to more than 180 countries and infecting over 1.6 billion people. Fever, cough, and fatigue are the most common initial symptoms of COVID-19, while some patients experience diarrhea rather than fever in the early stage. Many herbal medicine and Chinese patent medicine can significantly improve these symptoms, cure the patients experiencing a mild 22form of the illness, reduce the rate of transition from mild to severe disease, and reduce mortality. Therefore, this paper summarizes the physiopathological mechanisms of fever, cough, fatigue and diarrhea, and introduces Chinese herbal medicines (Ephedrae Herba, Gypsum Fibrosum, Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma, Asteris Radix et Rhizoma, Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma, Codonopsis Radix, Atractylodis Rhizoma, etc.) and Chinese patent medicines (Shuang-huang-lian, Ma-xing-gan-shi-tang, etc.) with their corresponding therapeutic effects. Emphasis was placed on their material basis, mechanism of action, and clinical research. Most of these medicines possess the pharmacological activities of anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiviral, and immunity-enhancement, and may be promising medicines for the treatment or adjuvant treatment of COVID-19 patients.

Overview of Neurological Mechanism of Pain Profile Used for Animal "Pain-Like" Behavioral Study with Proposed Analgesic Pathways

Pain is the most common sensation installed in us naturally which plays a vital role in defending us against severe harm. This neurological mechanism pathway has been one of the most complex and comprehensive topics but there has never been an elaborate justification of the types of analgesics that used to reduce the pain sensation through which specific pathways. Of course, there have been some answers to curbing of pain which is a lifesaver in numerous situations-chronic and acute pain conditions alike. This has been explored by scientists using pain-like behavioral study methodologies in non-anesthetized animals since decades ago to characterize the analgesic profile such as centrally or peripherally acting drugs and allowing for the development of analgesics. However, widely the methodology is being practiced such as the tail flick/Hargreaves test and Von Frey/Randall-Selitto tests which are stimulus-evoked nociception studies, and there has rarely been a complete review of all these methodologies, their benefits and its downside coupled with the mechanism of the action that is involved. Thus, this review solely focused on the complete protocol that is being adapted in each behavioral study methods induced by different phlogogenic agents, the different assessment methods used for phasic, tonic and inflammatory pain studies and the proposed mechanism of action underlying each behavioral study methodology for analgesic drug profiling. It is our belief that this review could significantly provide a concise idea and improve our scientists' understanding towards pain management in future research.

Tests and models of nociception and pain in rodents

Nociception and pain is a large field of both neuroscience and medical research. Over time, various tests and models were developed in rodents to provide tools for fundamental and translational research on the topic. Tests using thermal, mechanical, and chemical stimuli, measures of hyperalgesia and allodynia, models of inflammatory or neuropathic pain, constitute a toolbox available to researchers. These tests and models allowed rapid progress on the anatomo-molecular basis of physiological and pathological pain, even though they have yet to translate into new analgesic drugs. More recently, a growing effort has been put forth trying to assess pain in rats or mice, rather than nociceptive reflexes, or at studying complex states affected by chronic pain. This aids to further improve the translational value of preclinical research in a field with balanced research efforts between fundamental research, preclinical work, and human studies. This review describes classical tests and models of nociception and pain in rodents. It also presents some recent and ongoing developments in nociceptive tests, recent trends for pain evaluation, and raises the question of the appropriateness between tests, models, and procedures.

[Acute pain measurement in animals. Part 1]

OBJECTIVE

To describe tests of nociception which appear in the "pre-clinical" literature.

DATA SOURCES

References obtained by computerized bibliographic research (Medline) and the authors' personal data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ethical problems arising from the study of the pain in awake animals, problems arising from the choice of stimulus and stimulus parameters and the quantification of responses are presented. Pain in animals can be estimated only by examining their reactions, but at the same time, the existence of a reaction does not necessarily mean that there is a concomitant sensation. A description of the signs of pain in mammals is proposed. A noxious stimulus can be defined by its physical nature, its site of application and what has previously happened to the tissues at this site. Electrical stimulation short-circuits the process of transduction at free nerve endings and is not specific; however it has the advantage that it can be applied suddenly and briefly and thus results in synchronised signals in the relevant primary afferent fibres which can be differentiated into A delta and C fibres. Heat selectively stimulates thermoreceptors and nociceptors, but the low calorific power of conventional stimulators restricts their usefulness. Radiant sources have the disadvantage of emitting waves in the visible and the adjacent infrared spectra, for which the skin is a poor absorber and good reflector. Thermodes have the disadvantage of activating mechanoreceptors and thermoreceptors simultaneously; furthermore, their capacity for transferring heat depends on the quality of contact with skin and thus on the pressure with which they are applied. These problems can be overcome by using CO2 lasers but even today, the cost of these is a major disadvantage. Chemical stimuli differ from those mentioned above by the progressive onset of their effectiveness, their duration of action and the fact that they are of an inescapable nature. Experimental models employing chemical stimuli are undoubtedly the most similar to acute clinical pain. A wide spectrum of reactions are observed in nociceptive tests, but in almost every case they involve motor responses. After defining the ideal characteristics of a nociceptive test, tests based on the use of short duration and longer duration stimuli are presented. In tests of phasic pain, reactions are evoked by thermal (tail-flick test, hot-plate test), mechanical or electrical (flinch-jump test, vocalisation test) stimuli. Tests of tonic pain employ injections of algogenic agents intradermally (formalin test) or intraperitoneally (writhing test) or even the dilation of hollow organs. All these tests will be critically appraised in a subsequent paper [1].

CONCLUSION

The tail-flick and hot-plate tests are the most used, but there is an increasing recourse to the formalin test and tests involving foot withdrawal after mechanical stimulation.

Automated behavioural analysis in animal pain studies

The assessment of the effectiveness of analgesics is strongly based on observational data from behavioural tests. These tests are interesting and give a quantification of the effect of the drugs on the whole animal but their use is subject to several difficulties: (i) many results are difficult to analyse as they only correspond to the evaluation of a reflex response; (ii) the tests dealing with more integrated responses are also more difficult to use and closely depend on the experimenter's subjectivity. If automation is widely used in a lot of research fields, this is not the case in behavioural pharmacology. Yet, it can contribute to optimize the tests. The use of signal processing devices allows the automated (and thus objective) measurement of behavioural reactions to nociceptive stimulation (amplitude of a reflex, vocal emission intensity). Mechanical devices based on a computer-driven dynamic force detector allows the recording of some pain behaviours. Video image analysis allows the quantification of more complex behaviours (nociception-induced specific motor behaviours) as well as meaningful information during the same experimentation (exploratory behaviour, total motor activity, feeding behaviour). Moreover, these methods make it possible to obtain a more objective measurement, to reduce animal-experimenter interactions, to ease system use, and to improve effectiveness. The prospects to work in this field are multiple: continuation of the attempts at an automation of the behaviours specifically induced by chronic pain; development of real animal pain monitoring based on analysis of specific and non-specific behavioural modifications induced by pain. In this context, the automation of the behavioural analysis is likely to make possible real ethical progress thanks to an increase in the test's effectiveness and a real taking into account of animal's pain. Nevertheless, there are some limits due to characteristics of the behavioural expression of nociception and technological problems.

Audible and ultrasonic vocalization elicited by a nociceptive stimulus in rat: relationship with respiration

Brief electrical pulses applied to a rat's tail elicit complex vocal responses including audible ("peeps," "chatters") and ultrasonic components. These responses, particularly the two first peeps which have been shown to be triggered by A delta- and C-fibers, could provide a useful tool in pain studies. In the present study, we aimed to optimize this test by investigating the influence of respiration on the vocal responses. The following results were obtained: 1) As expected, the vocalization periods were concomitant with expiration; 2) The phase of the respiratory cycle at the onset of stimulation did not modify the mean intensities of the peeps; 3) The lung volume at the onset of stimulation significantly influenced the intensity and duration of the first peep and the latency of the second peep. Taking account of respiratory parameters in pain tests based on a quantified analysis of vocal responses could improve their sensibility by reducing variability and their specificity by detecting confounding factors such as effects of drugs on respiratory centres or on motor function.

Audible and ultrasonic vocalization elicited by single electrical nociceptive stimuli to the tail in the rat

We describe audible and ultrasonic vocalization elicited in rats by a short electrical pulse applied to the tail. Three types of vocal emissions were recorded: (1) 'peep', characterized by a repartition of energy over a wide range (0-50 kHz) of frequencies without any clear structure; (2) 'chatters', characterized by an audible (frequencies in hearing range of humans) fundamental frequency (2.47 +/- 0.03 kHz) and harmonics; and (3) 'ultrasonic emissions', characterized by a succession of slightly modulated pulses with frequencies in the 20-35 kHz range. Peeps and chatters were never recorded before the application of the stimuli. Several different vocalization patterns were described in terms of these types of responses. Just after the stimulation, all the animals emitted a 1st peep, which was generally (61%) followed by a 2nd one. They appeared with reproducible latencies, durations and envelopes. The envelopes of the audible (peeps and chatters) responses were intensity-dependent. Experimental data (moving the stimulation site, lidocaine injection) indicated that the 1st and 2nd peeps were triggered by two different groups of peripheral fibres with mean conduction velocities of 7.3 +/- 0.8 and 0.7 +/- 0.1 m/sec, respectively. This suggested an involvement of A delta and C fibres. Morphine showed a naloxone-reversible and dose-dependent antinociceptive effect by decreasing the 1st and 2nd peep envelopes. It is concluded that a short stimulus applied to the tail triggers a complex behavioural repertoire. It is proposed that this model will be a useful tool for physiological and pharmacological studies of nociception.