Mutagenecity of ethylene glycol ethers and of their metabolites in Salmonella trphimurium his−

A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins

In vitro genotoxicity testing needs to include tests in both bacterial and mammalian cells, and be able to detect gene mutations, chromosomal damage and aneuploidy. This may be achieved by a combination of the Ames test (detects gene mutations) and the in vitro micronucleus test (MNvit), since the latter detects both chromosomal aberrations and aneuploidy. In this paper we therefore present an analysis of an existing database of rodent carcinogens and a new database of in vivo genotoxins in terms of the in vitro genotoxicity tests needed to detect their in vivo activity. Published in vitro data from at least one test system (most were from the Ames test) were available for 557 carcinogens and 405 in vivo genotoxins. Because there are fewer publications on the MNvit than for other mammalian cell tests, and because the concordance between the MNvit and the in vitro chromosomal aberration (CAvit) test is so high for clastogenic activity, positive results in the CAvit test were taken as indicative of a positive result in the MNvit where there were no, or only inadequate data for the latter. Also, because Hprt and Tk loci both detect gene-mutation activity, a positive Hprt test was taken as indicative of a mouse-lymphoma Tk assay (MLA)-positive, where there were no data for the latter. Almost all of the 962 rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins were detected by an in vitro battery comprising Ames+MNvit. An additional 11 carcinogens and six in vivo genotoxins would apparently be detected by the MLA, but many of these had not been tested in the MNvit or CAvit tests. Only four chemicals emerge as potentially being more readily detected in MLA than in Ames+MNvit--benzyl acetate, toluene, morphine and thiabendazole--and none of these are convincing cases to argue for the inclusion of the MLA in addition to Ames+MNvit. Thus, there is no convincing evidence that any genotoxic rodent carcinogens or in vivo genotoxins would remain undetected in an in vitro test battery consisting of Ames+MNvit.

Assessing the toxic effects of ethylene glycol ethers using Quantitative Structure Toxicity Relationship models

Experimental determination of toxicity profiles consumes a great deal of time, money, and other resources. Consequently, businesses, societies, and regulators strive for reliable alternatives such as Quantitative Structure Toxicity Relationship (QSTR) models to fill gaps in toxicity profiles of compounds of concern to human health. The use of glycol ethers and their health effects have recently attracted the attention of international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO). The board members of Concise International Chemical Assessment Documents (CICAD) recently identified inadequate testing as well as gaps in toxicity profiles of ethylene glycol mono-n-alkyl ethers (EGEs). The CICAD board requested the ATSDR Computational Toxicology and Methods Development Laboratory to conduct QSTR assessments of certain specific toxicity endpoints for these chemicals. In order to evaluate the potential health effects of EGEs, CICAD proposed a critical QSTR analysis of the mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and developmental effects of EGEs and other selected chemicals. We report here results of the application of QSTRs to assess rodent carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and developmental toxicity of four EGEs: 2-methoxyethanol, 2-ethoxyethanol, 2-propoxyethanol, and 2-butoxyethanol and their metabolites. Neither mutagenicity nor carcinogenicity is indicated for the parent compounds, but these compounds are predicted to be developmental toxicants. The predicted toxicity effects were subjected to reverse QSTR (rQSTR) analysis to identify structural attributes that may be the main drivers of the developmental toxicity potential of these compounds.

Mechanisms of 2-Butoxyethanol–Induced Hemangiosarcomas

Chronic exposure to 2-butoxyethanol increased liver hemangiosarcomas in male mice. The mechanism for the selective induction of hemangiosarcomas by 2-butoxyethanol is unknown but has been suggested to occur through non-DNA-reactive mechanisms. The occurrence of liver hemangiosarcomas in male mice has been linked to oxidative damage subsequent to RBC hemolysis and iron deposition and activation of macrophages (Kupffer cells) in the liver, events that exhibit a threshold in both animals and humans. 2-Butoxyethanol is metabolized to 2-butoxyacetaldehyde and 2-butoxyacetic acid, and although the aldehyde metabolite is short lived, the potential exists for this metabolite to cause DNA damage. The present study examined whether 2-butoxyethanol and its metabolites, 2-butoxyacetaldehyde and 2-butoxyacetic acid, damaged mouse endothelial cell DNA using the comet assay. No increase in DNA damage was observed following 2-butoxyethanol (1-10mM), 2-butoxyacetaldehyde (0.1-1.0mM), or 2-butoxyacetic acid (1-10mM) in endothelial cells after 2, 4, or 24 h of exposure. Additional studies examined the involvement of hemolysis and macrophage activation in 2-butoxyethanol carcinogenesis. DNA damage was produced by hemolyzed RBCs (10 x 10(6), 4 h), ferrous sulfate (0.1-1.0 microM; 2-24 h), and hydrogen peroxide (50-100 microM; 1-4 h) in endothelial cells. Hemolyzed RBCs also activated macrophages, as evidenced by increased tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, while neither 2-butoxyethanol nor butoxyacetic acid increased TNF-alpha from macrophages. The effect of activated macrophages on endothelial cell DNA damage and DNA synthesis was also studied. Coculture of endothelial cells with activated macrophages increased endothelial cell DNA damage after 4 or 24 h and increased endothelial cell DNA synthesis after 24 h. These data demonstrate that 2-butoxyethanol and related metabolites do not directly cause DNA damage. Supportive evidence also demonstrated that damaged RBCs, iron, and/or products from macrophage activation (possibly reactive oxygen species) produce DNA damage in endothelial cells and that activated macrophages stimulate endothelial cell proliferation. These events coupled together provide the events necessary for the induction of hemangiosarcomas by 2-butoxyethanol.

INRS activities on risk assessment of glycol ethers

The occupational exposure assessment uses data from published sources, from Industry (most often from the producers), and from dedicated occupational exposure data bases, as well as evaluations using the EASE model (Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure). Atmospheric concentrations and characteristics of skin contacts are evaluated in different scenarios (such as manufacturing, formulating, main and most polluting uses) and sub-scenarios (e.g. warm water dilution). Air concentrations of EGBE are low during production (most often <0.5 mg/m(3)), incidental excursions being <50 mg/m(3); the "worst-case" mean concentration is proposed as 9 mg/m(3). Skin contact, according to EASE, may be in the range of 0-0.1 mg/cm(2)(day), and should be mitigated by the use of suitable gloves. For formulations of products containing EGBE, air concentrations are evaluated as 10 mg/m(3) and skin contact as 0.19 mg/cm(2)(day). The "reasonable worst case" air concentrations (8-Hr TWA) are assessed at around 11 mg/m(3) (coating industry), from 5 to 20 mg/m(3) in printing activities (depending on the task), and in the 20-70 mg/m(3) range (upper limit 40 mg/m(3) in better controlled situations) for cleaning activities. Skin contact would be around twice the preceding level, i.e., 0.4 mg/cm(2)(day) for coating as well as cleaning activities. EGBE and its major metabolites, 2-butoxyacetaldehyde (2-BAL) and 2-butoxyacetic acid (2-BAA) have been subjected to tests for genetic toxicity tests both in vitro and in vivo. While some positive responses have been obtained, the balance of the evidence indicates that EGBE does not express significant genotoxic activity. There are no epidemiological data investigating a relationship between exposure to EGBE and human cancer. Two carcinogenicity inhalation bioassays have been conducted in rodents, one in rats and one in mice. Significant increases were found in forestomach tumours in female mice and haemangiosarcomas in male mice. No increases in tumour incidences were found in either male or female rats. Mechanistic studies have suggested the crucial involvement in the pathogenesis of haemangiosarcomas of a chain of events consisting of (1) haemolysis due to BAA, followed by (2) hepatic haemosiderin deposition and (3) the subsequent generation of reactive oxygen species within the endothelial cells from which haemangiosarcomas arise. Since human erythrocytes are particularly resistant to the haemolytic effects of BAA, it is extremely unlikely, according to this model, that the haemangiosarcomas observed in male mice will have human significance. Similarly, mechanistic studies on the female mouse forestomach tumours have suggested that these also are not important as an indication of human risk. In vivo, EGBE tested in a continuous breeding study and in repeated dose toxicity tests, did not produced specific effects on reproductive organs or fertility parameters. For developmental toxicity, rats, mice and rabbits were dosed via oral and/or inhalation routes. Foeto- and embryo-toxicity was observed in presence or maternal toxicity (haemolytic anaemia). The data available give plausible support to the hypothesis that this developmental toxicity is a direct consequence of maternal toxicity. There are no epidemiological data investigating a relationship between exposure to EGBE alone and human reproductive effects.

Final report on the safety assessment of ethoxyethanol and ethoxyethanol acetate

Ethoxyethanol is an ether alcohol described as a solvent and viscosity-decreasing agent for use in cosmetics. Ethoxyethanol Acetate is the ester of Ethoxyethanol and acetic acid described as a solvent for use in cosmetics. Although these ingredients have been used in the past, neither ingredient is in current use. Ethoxyethanol is produced by reacting ethylene oxide with ethyl alcohol. Ethoxyethanol Acetate is produced via an esterification of Ethoxyethanol and acetic acid, acetic acid anhydride, or acetic chloride. Ethoxyethanol is metabolized to ethoxyacetaldehyde, which is further metabolized to ethoxyacetic acid, which is also a metabolite of Ethoxyethanol Acetate. Low to moderate acute inhalation toxicity is seen in animals studies. Acute oral toxicity studies in several species reported kidney damage, including extreme tubular degeneration. Kidney damage was also seen in acute dermal toxicity studies in rats and rabbits. Minor liver and kidney damage was also seen in short-term studies of rats injected subcutaneously with Ethoxyethanol, but was absent in dogs dosed intravenously. Mixed toxicity results were also seen in subchronic tests in mice and rats. Ethoxyethanol and Ethoxyethanol Acetate were mild to moderate eye irritants in rabbits; mild skin irritants in rabbits, and nonsensitizing in guinea pigs. Most genotoxicity tests were negative, but chromosome aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges were among the positive results seen. Numerous reproductive and developmental toxicity studies, across several species, involving various routes of administration, indicate that Ethoxyethanol and Ethoxyethanol Acetate are reproductive toxicants and teratogens. Mild anemia was reported in individuals exposed occupationally to Ethoxyethanol, which resolved when the chemical was not used. Reproductive effects have been noted in males exposed occupationally to Ethoxyethanol. Although there are insufficient data to determine the potential carcinogenic effects of Ethoxyethanol or Ethoxyethanol Acetate, there is evidence that these chemicals are absorbed across human skin and that they are reproductive and developmental toxicants via dermal exposure. Therefore, these ingredients are unsafe for use in cosmetic formulations.

How can chemical compounds alter human fertility?

The effects of environmental toxins, such as pesticides, solvents and industrial waste, on human and animal health have caused much public fear. The suggested mechanism of action for these xenobiotics is their capacity to interact with steroid hormones receptors, in particular those for estrogens and androgens. Concern was reinforced by the "historical" example of diethylstilbestrol, an estradiol mimetic causing genital cancer in girls exposed in utero. The real harm of these environmental xenobiotics is controversial. Some authors estimate that they do not reach sufficiently high concentrations to do damage and much experimental work has been done. In this review, we summarise the latest findings on the molecular mechanisms of action of three environmental toxicants, xenohormones, dioxin and glycol ethers and compare animal and cell experimental model data with epidemiological studies.

In vitro toxicities of experimental jet fuel system ice-inhibiting agents

One research emphasis within the Department of Defense has been to seek the replacement of operational compounds with alternatives that pose less potential risk to human and ecological systems. Alternatives to glycol ethers, such as diethylene glycol monomethyl ether (M-DE), were investigated for use as jet fuel system ice-inhibiting agents (FSIIs). This group of chemicals includes three derivatives of 1,3-dioxolane-4-methanol (M-1, M-2, and M-3) and a 1,3-dioxane (M-27). In addition, M-DE was evaluated as a reference compound. Our approach was to implement an in vitro test battery based on primary rat hepatocyte cultures to perform initial toxicity evaluations. Hepatocytes were exposed to experimental chemicals (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 mM dosages) for periods up to 24 h. Samples were assayed for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, MTT dye reduction activity, glutathione level, and rate of protein synthesis as indicators of toxicity. Of the compounds tested, M-1, especially at the 10-mM dose, appeared to be more potent than the other chemicals, as measured by these toxicity assays. M-DE, the current FSII, elicited little response in the toxicity assays. Although some variations in toxicity were observed at the 10-mM dose, the in vitro toxicities of the chemicals tested (except for M-1) were not considerably greater than that of M-DE.

Toxicity review of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and its acetate ester

Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME) and its acetate ester (EGMEA) are highly flammable, colorless, moderately volatile liquids with very good solubility properties. They are used in paints, lacquers, stains, inks and surface coatings, silk-screen printing, photographic and photo lithographic processes, for example, in the semiconductor industry, textile and leather finishing, production of food-contact plastics, and as an antiicing additive in hydraulic fluids and jet fuel. EGME and EGMEA are efficiently absorbed by inhalation as well as via dermal penetration. Dermal absorption may contribute substantially to the total uptake following skin contact with liquids or vapours containing EGME or EGMEA. EGMEA is rapidly converted to EGME in the body and the two substances are equally toxic in animals. Therefore, the two substances should be considered as equally hazardous to man. Effects on peripheral blood, testes, and sperm have been reported at occupational exposure levels ranging between 0.4 and 10 ppm EGME in air, and with additional, possibly substantial, dermal exposure. Severe malformations and disturbed hematopoiesis have been linked with exposure to EGME and EGMEA at unknown, probably high, levels. Embryonic deaths in monkeys and impaired spermatogenesis in rabbits have been reported after daily oral doses of 12 and 25 mg per kg body weight, respectively. In several studies, increased frequency of spontaneous abortions, disturbed menstrual cycle, and subfertility have been demonstrated in women working in the semiconductor industry. The contribution of EGME in relation to other exposure factors in the semiconductor industry is unclear.

Apoptosis inhibition and ornithine decarboxylase superinduction as early epigenetic events in morphological transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells exposed to 2-methoxyacetaldehyde, a metabolite of 2-methoxyethanol

We have conducted a study to determine the carcinogenic potential of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME), a member of the glycol ether family, as compared to its reactive metabolite 2-methoxy-acetaldehyde (MALD). Since disruption of equilibrium between cell proliferation and cell death is thought to play a key role in multistage carcinogenesis, we investigated, in Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells exposed to various doses of EGME and MALD, impairment in apoptosis rate and in ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) metabolism. The activity of this rate-limiting enzyme of polyamine biosynthesis is closely related to cell proliferation and cell transformation. At the end-point, comparative action of the two products on SHE cell morphological transformation frequency was evaluated. One-stage exposure of SHE cells to 2 mM EGME and 200 microM MALD for 5 h did not change basal apoptotic level, whereas 0.16 microM phorbol ester (TPA) decreased it. Using two-stage exposure protocol (1 h xenobiotic followed by 5 h TPA), MALD strongly inhibited apoptosis more than did TPA alone; the parent compound EGME did not have any effect on TPA inhibiting action. Western blotting analysis showed that sequential treatment (MALD/TPA) increased Bcl-2 oncoprotein expression, whereas Bcl-XL and Bax proteins were not changed. The same staged exposure of SHE cells to MALD/TPA strongly induced ODC activity, and the rate was higher than that obtained with TPA alone: this was accompanied by an increase of ODC protein level. This ODC superinduction was not observed with EGME/TPA treatment. In long-term SHE-cell morphological transformation assay, staged exposure to MALD (800 microM or 1 mM for 24 h) followed by TPA applications increased the number of transformed colonies at the seventh day. Such early cooperative events as apoptosis inhibition and ODC superinduction, followed by the increase of SHE-cell transformation frequency, are highly indicative of a carcinogenic potential for the metabolite, MALD.

Two-stage exposure of Syrian-hamster-embryo cells to environmental carcinogens: superinduction of ornithine decarboxylase correlates with increase of morphological-transformation frequency

As part of environmental toxicology, it is important to assess both the carcinogenic potential of xenobiotics and their mode of action on target cells. Since dysregulation of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), a rate-limiting enzyme of polyamine biosynthesis, is considered as an early and essential component in the process of multistage carcinogenesis, we have studied the mode of ODC induction in Syrian-hamster-embryo(SHE) cells stage-exposed to carcinogens and to non-carcinogens. One-stage (5 hr) treatment of SHE cells with 50 microM clofibrate (CLF), a non-genotoxic carcinogen, or with 0.4 microM benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), a genotoxic carcinogen, slightly decreased basal ODC activity. Using the 2-stage exposure, 1 hr to carcinogen, then replacement by TPA for 5 hr, the ODC activity was higher than that obtained with TPA alone. This ODC superinduction was not observed when SHE cells were similarly pre-treated with non-carcinogenic compounds. Several environmental chemicals, pesticides, solvents, oxidizers and drugs were investigated with this SHE cell model. With one-stage exposure, some xenobiotics decreased basal ODC activity, while for others ODC changes were not noticeable. With 2-stage exposure (chemical followed by TPA), all carcinogens amplified the TPA-inducing effect, resulting in ODC superinduction. Comparative studies of the action of carcinogens and of non-carcinogens, using 2-stage exposure protocols, clearly show a close relationship between ODC induction rate and morphological transformation frequency.

Review of the genotoxicity of 2-butoxyethanol

The available data on the genotoxicity of 2-butoxyethanol have been reviewed. 2-Butoxyethanol has been examined for genotoxic activity in a range of in vitro and in vivo assays, including the mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay. The in vitro assays used range from well validated and generally accepted assays such as the Salmonella/microsome and in vitro cytogenetic assay, through to less well validated assays such as assessment of the inhibition of metabolic cooperation in V79 cells. The levels of experimental details and data reporting vary across the studies with some papers presenting only limited information. Taking the above factors into consideration, the available data indicate that 2-butoxyethanol has no significant genotoxic activity. This conclusion is also consistent with the chemical structure of 2-butoxyethanol, which is not alerting for likely genotoxic activity. These collected considerations indicate that 2-butoxyethanol is unlikely to be a genotoxic carcinogen to rodents, a prediction that supplements seventeen published predictions of the outcome of the ongoing NTP rodent carcinogenicity bioassays.