Effects of bright incandescent light on seasonal and nonseasonal major depressive disorder

Rate of switch from bipolar depression into mania after morning light therapy: A historical review

Light therapy (LT) is efficacious for bipolar depression with effect sizes equivalent to those in antidepressant pharmacotherapy trials. Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) show a 15-40% rate of manic switches during antidepressant drug treatment. The rate of manic switches during LT has never been estimated. We searched all the literature studies reporting effects of antidepressant LT in BD. 41 studies described 799 patients with BD treated with antidepressant LT, from among which 7 (0.9%) switched into mania and 11 (1.4%) switched into hypomania. The method of assessment of treatment-emergent symptoms significantly influenced the detection of switches into mania: 0% when no method was reported, 0.8% with clinical mental state examination, and 3% with rating scales (χ² = 14.805, d.f. 4, p = 0.005). The rate of switch increased to 18.8% when considering the 16 patients with rapid-cycling BD. Switches occurred independent of treatment modality (light intensity, duration, and circadian timing of administration). The available literature shows that the highest reported rate of switch from bipolar depression into mania after LT is closely similar to the 4% switch rate expected during the placebo treatment of BD, thus not justifying specific concerns when using this treatment option.

Magnetic fields and seasonality of affective illness: Implications for therapy

Seasonal affective disorder is characterized by recurrent winter depression associated with hypersomnia, overeating, and carbohydrate craving. The severe form of winter depression affects about 5% of the general population and is believed to be caused by light deficiency. About 70%-80% of patients with winter depression experience attenuation of symptoms when exposed to bright light therapy. Hypotheses pertaining to the pathogenesis of winter depression implicate the effects of light on different characteristics of circadian rhythms. One of the environmental factors which may be implicated, in addition to light, in the pathophysiology of winter depression is the geomagnetic field. There is strong indication that the pineal gland is a magnetosensitive system and that changes in the ambient magnetic field alter melatonin secretion and synchronize the circadian rhythms. In man, shielding of the ambient magnetic field significantly desynchronizes circadian rhythms which could be gradually resynchronized after application of magnetic fields. The strength of the environmental magnetic field diminishes during the winter months, leading to increased susceptibility for desynchronization of circadian rhythms. Thus, since the acute application of magnetic fields in experimental animals resembles that of acute exposure to light with respect to melatonin secretion (i.e., suppression of melatonin secretion), magnetic treatment might be beneficial for patients with winter depression. In addition, since the environmental light and magnetic fields, which undergo diurnal and seasonal variations, influence the activity of the pineal gland, we propose that a synergistic effect of light and magnetic therapy in patients with winter depression would be more physiological and, therefore, superior to phototherapy alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Contrast sensitivity in seasonal and nonseasonal depression

BACKGROUND

Psychophysics has been used for the early diagnosis of many diseases that affect the visual pathway including those not usually considered vision-related (e.g., Parkinson's disease). Little has been done, however, to investigate visual functioning in psychological disorders known to be effectively treated by phototherapy. We measured the static and dynamic spatial contrast detection thresholds of seasonally depressed (SAD), nonseasonally depressed (Depressed) and nondepressed (Control) individuals.

METHODS

Two psychophysical experiments which measured luminance contrast detection thresholds were conducted. Experiment 1 presented static, vertically oriented Gabors with center spatial frequencies ranging from 0.3 to 12.0 cpd (cycles per degree). Experiment 2 presented 0.5, 1.5 and 4.0 cpd Gabors whose phases were sinusoidally reversed at 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 16.0, and 32.0 c/s (Hz).

RESULTS

SAD showed significantly greater contrast sensitivities than Controls for static spatial frequencies equal to or greater than 6.0 cpd. Depressed showed significantly greater contrast sensitivities at 6.0 cpd and 12.0 cpd. With phase modulation, the SAD group showed significantly enhanced contrast sensitivity with 4.0 cpd-2.0 Hz Gabors. All other results at lower spatial-higher temporal frequencies were not significant.

LIMITATIONS

Most of the subjects were drawn from the student population instead of the community or clinics, even though they met the criteria for clinical depression. Antidepressant use was not controlled for among the subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that clinical depression can enhance contrast sensitivity when stimuli elicit strong parvocellular responses. These enhancements implicate differences in retinal functionality. Mechanisms that link neuromodulatory activity to retinal signal processing are proposed.

Effects of light therapy on sleep, mood, and temperature in women with nonseasonal major depression

Research has supported the applicability and efficacy of light therapy in the treatment of nonseasonal depression. The investigators examined the effects of light therapy on sleep, core temperature, depressed mood, and perception of fatigue and energy in a sample of pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women diagnosed with nonseasonal, nonbipolar depression. Women were randomly assigned to either light therapy (n = 16) or placebo (n = 13) for a 28-day period. Pre and post measures of sleep and core temperature were collected. In addition, measures of depressed mood, fatigue, and energy were collected throughout the study period. Significant changes in depression and energy were found in the treatment group, but not in the placebo group. There was a significant reduction in the temperature mesor and less wake time during the first third of the sleep period in the treatment group but not in the placebo group. Light therapy yielded significant improvement in depression when compared with placebo intervention and core temperature mesor returned to normal. There was no significant phase shift, perhaps due in part to the absence of any baseline circadian phase disturbances. Relationships between temperature, sleep, depressed mood, fatigue, and energy variables offer potential directions for future research and clinical intervention.

Light treatment of mood disorders

In 1981, seven patients with nonseasonal depression were treated with bright white light in 1982, bright artificial light was used to treat a manic-depressive patient with a seasonal mood cycle. In the last 20 years, a plethora of studies have further defined the depressive populations, who are responsive to light treatment; the optimal timing, intensity, spectral frequency, and duration of treatment; its comparison with other pharmacological interventions; predictors of response; side-effect profiles; viable placebo-control conditions; alternative devices and forms of administration; potential mechanisms and anatomical pathways mediating light's physiological effects; and its application to other disorders and subsyndromaI states. These studies have been conducted across multiple countries with surprisingly consistent results. Further work is needed, as highlighted in this review, to clarify the specific mechanism of action in subtypes of depressive disorders and differential age and gender effects. Although the majority of work in this area is relatively new, it behooves the reader to remember that Solomon, almost 3000 years ago, wrote in Ecclesiastes: "Truly the light is sweet and a pleasant thing it is for the eyes to behold the sun" (11:7).

Light therapy for non-seasonal depression

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of light therapy for non-seasonal depression has been studied without any consensus on its efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical effects of bright light therapy in comparison to the inactive placebo treatment for non-seasonal depression.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Depression Anxiety & Neurosis Controlled Trials register (CCDANCTR January 2003), comprising the results of searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 -), EMBASE (1980 -), CINAHL (1982 -), LILACS (1982 -), National Research Register, PsycINFO/PsycLIT (1974 -), PSYNDEX (1977 -), and SIGLE (1982 - ) using the group search strategy and the following terms: #30 = phototherapy or ("light therapy" or light-therapy). We also sought trials from conference proceedings and references of included papers, and contacted the first author of each study as well as leading researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing bright light with inactive placebo treatments for non-seasonal depression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and quality assessment was made independently by two reviewers. The authors were contacted to obtain additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies (49 reports) were included in the review. Most of the studies applied bright light as adjunctive treatment to drug therapy, sleep deprivation, or both. In general, the quality of reporting was poor, and many reviews did not report adverse effects systematically. The treatment response in the bright light group was better than in the control treatment group, but did not reach statistical significance. The result was mainly based on studies of less than 8 days of treatment. The response to bright light was significantly better than to control treatment in high-quality studies (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.50 to -0.31), in studies applying morning light treatment (SMD -0.38, CI -0.62 to -0.14), and in sleep deprivation responders (SMD -1.02, CI -1.60 to -0.45). Hypomania was more common in the bright light group compared to the control treatment group (risk ratio 4.91, CI 1.66 to 14.46, number needed to harm 8, CI 5 to 20). Twenty studies (49 reports) were included in the review. Most of the studies applied bright light as adjunctive treatment to drug therapy, sleep deprivation, or both. Treatment

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

For patients suffering from non-seasonal depression, bright light therapy offers modest though promising antidepressive efficacy, especially when administered during the first week of treatment, in the morning, and as an adjunctive treatment to sleep deprivation responders. Hypomania as a potential adverse effect needs to be considered. Due to limited data and heterogeneity of studies these results need to be interpreted with caution.

Impact of UVA exposure on psychological parameters and circulating serotonin and melatonin

BACKGROUND

People tend to feel better after exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. This study was performed to investigate the impact of UVA exposure on psychological and neuroendocrine parameters.

METHODS

Fifty-three volunteers were separated into 42 individuals who had UVA exposure and 11 individuals who had no UVA exposure. The UVA-exposed volunteers had irradiation sessions six times in a three-week period. All volunteers completed two questionnaires at baseline (T1) and at the end of the study (T3). For the determination of serotonin and melatonin serum levels of all volunteers blood samples were collected at baseline (T1), after the first UVA exposure (T2), and at the end of the study after the sixth exposure (T3).

RESULTS

UVA-exposed volunteers felt significantly more balanced, less nervous, more strengthened, and more satisfied with their appearance at T3. By contrast, the controls did not show significant changes of psychological parameters. In comparison to T1 and T3, serum serotonin was significantly higher and the serum melatonin was significantly lower for the volunteers exposed to UVA at T2. Both, for exposed and non-exposed volunteers serotonin and melatonin levels did not significantly differ at T1 and T3.

CONCLUSIONS

It remains obscure, whether the exposure to UVA or other components of the treatment were responsible for the psychological benefits observed. The changes of circulating neuroendocrine mediators found after UVA exposure at T2 may be due to an UVA-induced effect via a cutaneous pathway. Nevertheless, the positive psychological effects observed in our study cannot be attributed to circulating serotonin or melatonin.

Seasonal depression: the dual vulnerability hypothesis revisited

OBJECTIVE

In DSM-IV, winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is classified as a seasonal pattern of recurrent major depressive episodes in winter with full remission of symptoms in summer. However, other groups with "winter depression" have been identified, including patients with incomplete summer remission (ISR) and subsyndromal SAD (sub-SAD, winter depressive symptoms that do not meet criteria for major depression). In this study, we compare the clinical characteristics of these three seasonal groups and their response to light therapy.

METHOD

558 patients assessed at a specialized SAD Clinic were diagnosed using DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria. Clinical information was recorded using a checklist at index assessment. A subset of patients (N=192) were treated with an open, 2 week trial of light therapy using a 10000 lux fluorescent light box for 30 min per day in the early morning. Patients were assessed before and after treatment with the 29 item modified Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and clinical response was defined as greater than 50% improvement in scores.

RESULTS

The rates of some melancholic symptoms, anxiety, panic, suicidal ideation, and family history of mood disorder were lowest in the sub-SAD group. The clinical response rates to light therapy were highest in the sub-SAD group (N=32, 78%), intermediate in the SAD group (N=113, 66%), and lowest in the ISR group (N=47, 51%).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study of patients seen in a specialty clinic, although information was obtained in a standardized format. The light therapy trial had an open design so that placebo response could not be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in both the patterns of clinical symptoms and the response to light therapy in these three groups with winter depression. These results are consistent with a dual vulnerability hypothesis that considers these groups to result from interaction of separate factors for seasonality and depression.

Mood and energy regulation in seasonal and non-seasonal depression before and after midday treatment with physical exercise or bright light

The effects of two non-drug treatments (physical exercise and bright light) on mood, body weight and oxygen consumption were compared in age-matched groups of female subjects with winter depression, non-seasonal depression or without depression. It was found that oxygen consumption in the pre-treatment condition was similar in non-depressed subjects (n=18) and depressed non-seasonals (n=18), while comparatively lower values were obtained in winter depression (n=27). Neither mood nor metabolic parameters changed significantly in the group of nine untreated winter depressives. One week of physical exercise (1-h pedaling on a bicycle ergometer between 13.00 and 14.00 h) increased oxygen consumption in the group of nine winter depressives and lowered oxygen consumption in nine-subject groups of depressed and non-depressed non-seasonals. One week of bright light treatment (2-h exposure to 2500 lux between 14.00 and 16.00 h) increased oxygen consumption in nine winter depressives and nine non-depressed subjects, while no significant change in oxygen consumption was found in nine subjects with non-seasonal depression. Weight loss was observed in the groups treated with physical exercise and in the group of light-treated winter depressives. Winter depression responded equally well to exercising and light, while a significant therapeutic difference in favor of exercising was found in non-seasonal depression. Overall, the results of the study suggest that energy-regulating systems are implicated in the antidepressant action of the non-drug treatments.

Dose-response relationship of phototherapy for seasonal affective disorder: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The therapeutic effect of phototherapy for seasonal affective disorder (SAD) has been widely investigated. However, the antidepressant effect of various light intensities is inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-response relationship of phototherapy for SAD.

METHOD

A meta-analytical methodology was applied to 39 studies of phototherapy for SAD. The studies collected were screened for study quality by a threats-to-validity method before inclusion. The fixed-effects-model analysis of variance procedures were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The results indicated that different light intensities produced different effects in reducing the typical symptoms, as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, of patients with SAD. However, no significant differences in these effects were revealed between strong, medium and dim light in reducing the atypical symptoms of patients.

CONCLUSION

These findings showed that light intensity varied positively with the antidepressant effect for typical but not for atypical symptoms of SAD, suggesting that light intensity tended to have different therapeutic effects on the typical and atypical symptoms of SAD.

Pathophysiological mechanism of seasonal affective disorder

Despite the long history in medicine, the pathophysiological mechanism(s) of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) remain largely unknown. By employing a meta-analytic methodology, the authors of this study attempted to verify the validity of different pathophysiological mechanism(s) proposed for SAD. The findings showed that for phototherapy of medium light intensity, a combination of morning-evening therapy regime yielded the best therapeutic effect, and the antidepressant effect of the morning-evening light regime was superior to a single pulse of light administered at other times of day. Furthermore, the data showed that the antidepressant effect of a single pulse of light was similar for morning, midday, and evening light. These findings supported the photon-count hypothesis and refuted the proposed photoperiod, melatonin, and phase-shifting models of SAD.

Will light brighten the future of the depressed patient?

The present explosive growth of interest in the therapeutic possibilities of exposure to light was triggered by a patient, Herbert Kern. He suffered from episodic depressive and manic complaints and discovered, by registering these over the years, a seasonal pattern in their occurrence. Discussions with scientists of the NIMH resulted in his participation in a bright light-treatment experiment when he was depressed in the winter of 1980-1981. He recovered. Next, the same group of investigators defined the criteria for a new syndrome, Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD): a history of major affective disorder (according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria), at least two consecutive years in which the depressions have occurred during fall or winter and remitted in the following spring or summer, and the absence of any clear-cut seasonally changing psychosocial variable, such as work, stress and so on.

Atypical depressive symptoms in seasonal and non-seasonal mood disorders

The authors examined the rates of atypical depression and prevalence of specific atypical symptoms in patients with seasonal versus non-seasonal depression. Fifty-three patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) were compared to 54 patients with non-seasonal major depressive disorder (MDD) using the atypical depression diagnostic scale (ADDS). SAD patients scored significantly higher than non-seasonal MDD patients in hyperphagia and hypersomnia, and significantly lower in interpersonal sensitivity and other rejection avoidance. There was no difference in the rate of ADDS diagnosis of atypical depression. Differences between atypical depression and SAD suggest that they are separate subtypes of depression with an overlapping symptom picture.

Seasonal changes in affective state in samples of Asian and white women

Seasonality of the affective state has been reported to vary in direct proportion to latitude in temperate regions. The frequency of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and the severity of the symptoms associated with it have been reported to be greater in higher than in lower latitudes. In addition, recent research has suggested a genetic loading for SAD. Most of the research on the seasonality of affect has been done in high latitude areas, seasonal mood cycles have been infrequently investigated in tropical areas, and no study has so far measured and compared seasonal changes in affect and behaviour in indigenous and populations non-indigenous to high latitudes. To rule out the biases associated with retrospective designs, a prospective longitudinal study was designed to investigate seasonal mood variations in indigenous white and non-indigenous Asian populations. Since previous research has indicated the excessive vulnerability of women to winter depression, it was decided to measure seasonality of the affective state only in women. To examine the relative effects of genetic predispositions and physical environment, the Asian group was further divided into "Asian" and "Asian-British". The former group comprised women who were living in England but who had been born and had spent considerably more time in their country of origin, while the latter group consisted of women who were born in England and who had lived there all their lives. The three groups of 25 women each were matched for age and socio-economic status, and were interviewed every month for 1 year using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), a Behavioural Change Inventory (BCI), the Ladder Scale of General Well-being (LSW) and a Monthly Stress Inventory (MSI). One retrospective scale was administered at the end of the study year to compare the extent of seasonal change in affect with that on the HAD-depression subscale. The results showed that seasonal depression peaked in winter in all three groups, with the incidence of winter depression being highest in the Asian group. Seasonal changes on several dimensions of behaviour were in the direction of winter depression for all three groups. States other than depression (anxiety and general well-being) did not show any seasonal variation. Hours of daylight was found to be the best predictor of seasonal variation in mood among environmental and psychosocial variables. There was no evidence to support a genetic hypothesis for SAD.

Side effects of adjunct light therapy in patients with major depression

Adjunct bright-light therapy has been suggested to augment antidepressant drug treatment in patients with non-seasonal major depression. Side effects of the combined therapy have not been investigated thus far. Therefore, somatic complaints and side effects of combined therapy were evaluated in 28 patients with major depression (DSM-III-R) randomly assigned to either trimipramine or trimipramine and serially applied adjunct bright-light therapy. Response rates were comparable in both treatment groups and rates of newly emergent side effects during treatment were generally low. The most prominent unfavourable side effects of adjunct bright-light therapy as compared with trimipramine monotherapy were aggravated sedation, persisting restlessness, emerging sleep disturbance and decreased appetite as well as the worsening of vertigo. Discriminant analysis revealed that the combination of trimipramine with bright light results in a different side effect profile compared with drug monotherapy.

Sunny hospital rooms expedite recovery from severe and refractory depressions

Bright light therapy is an effective treatment for seasonal affective disorder, an uncommon condition marked by mild winter depression. Bright lights have been used as adjuncts in the pharmacological treatment of other types of depressive illness. The rooms in our psychiatric inpatient unit are so placed that half are bright and sunny and the rest are not. Reasoning that some patients were getting light therapy inadvertently, we compared the lengths of stay of depressed patients in sunny rooms with those of patients in dull rooms. Those in sunny rooms had an average stay of 16.9 days compared to 19.5 days for those in dull rooms, a difference of 2.6 days (15%): P < 0.05.

A follow-up study of seasonal affective disorder

BACKGROUND

The long-term course of seasonal affective disorder has not been well studied.

METHOD

Using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, we interviewed 75% of a sample of 124 subjects diagnosed from five to eight years previously as fulfilling DSM-III-R criteria for recurrent major affective disorder, seasonal pattern.

RESULTS

In the follow-up period, 38% of the sample continued to fulfil DSM-III-R criteria for seasonal illness; 28% had recurrent major depressive disorder, but no longer displayed a seasonal pattern; 18% were completely well with no further depression; 6% had subsyndromal symptoms; and 5%, although not meeting DSM-III-R criteria for seasonal illness, were still displaying constant periodicity. A short duration of index episode and a high frequency of illness predicted a continuing seasonal course of illness.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic criteria for seasonal affective disorder need to be further refined, possibly restrictively, if they are to be used to predict the future course of seasonal illness.

Clinical and chronobiological effects of light therapy on nonseasonal affective disorders

Light therapy (bright or dim light) was given at different times (morning or evening) to 27 unmedicated patients with nonseasonal depression (according to DSM-III-R criteria) and 16 normal volunteers. Circadian rhythms in body temperature were measured before and after light therapy. Bright light significantly improved clinical symptoms of depression, as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), independent of the time of phototherapy. Dim light therapy had no effect on HRSD scores. Circadian rhythms of body temperatures in patients with affective disorder were more sensitive to the entraining effects of bright light than those of normal subjects, but these effects were not related to clinical improvement. Bright light exposure has an antidepressant effect on patients with nonseasonal depression, but the effect is unlikely to be mediated via the same circadian system that regulates body temperature.

Light treatment in seasonal and nonseasonal depression

Ninety patients with major depressive disorder were classified according to seasonal (n = 68, 50 women) or nonseasonal (n = 22, 17 women) pattern according to DSM-III-R. They were also clinically evaluated and rated before and after morning (0600-0800) or evening (1800-2000) light treatment for 10 days in a room with a luminance of 350 cd/m2 (approximately 1500 lx) at eye level. Mood ratings were performed using both the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Depressed patients with seasonal pattern improved significantly more than those with a nonseasonal pattern suggesting a specific nonplacebo effect of light treatment in depressed patients with seasonal pattern. There were no significant differences in outcome when light treatment was given in the morning or in the evening, and not between patients with and without atypical symptoms such as carbohydrate craving or increased appetite.

Seasonal and non-seasonal depression. A comparison of clinical characteristics in Swedish patients

This study compares the clinical characteristics of 127 patients with major depression, 99 with a seasonal and 28 with a non-seasonal pattern. Non-seasonal depressives had significantly higher scores in the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Increased appetite and carbohydrate craving, were more frequently reported among patients with a seasonal pattern. Compared to previous reports, the Swedish patients with seasonal depression had less atypical vegetative symptomatology. The symptoms sadness, suicidal thoughts, slowness of movement, gastrointestinal symptoms, and weight loss were more frequent in the patients with a non-seasonal pattern. The clinical symptomatology has a low specificity compared to the seasonal pattern in diagnosing seasonal affective disorder according to DSM-III-R for seasonal and non-seasonal patterns.

Early light treatment can prevent an emerging winter depression from developing into a full-blown depression

The administration of light at the development of the first signs of a winter depression appears to prevent it from developing into a full-blown depression. Not a single patient from a group of 16 treated this way became severely depressed during the remaining part of the winter season, whereas 5 out of 11 from the non-treated control group did.

Morning and evening light treatment of seasonal affective disorder: response, relapse and prediction

Patients with seasonal affective disorder were randomly assigned to treatment with light in the morning (9.00-12.00 a.m.; n = 16; ML) or evening (6.00-9.00 p.m.; n = 11; EL). An intensive 24-day assessment procedure revealed the same response rates: 57% for ML, 50% for EL. During the rest of the winter season a relatively low relapse rate of 54% was found. No differences between ML and EL were found in the time course of depressed mood or fatigue. A significant negative correlation was found between diurnal variation during baseline and therapeutic response: the larger the diurnal variation the less the response, indicating a potential negative predictive value for this symptom. There were no significant correlations between baseline fatigue or hypersomnia and response.

Validity of seasonal pattern as a modifier for recurrent mood disorders for DSM-IV

Data are reviewed regarding the validity of seasonal pattern (SP), according to DSM-III-R, as a modifier for recurrent mood disorders. The relationship of the DSM-III-R formulation of SP is compared with that of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) as used by the bulk of researchers in the area. Both definitions are evaluated against the criteria for validity suggested by Robins and Guze, by Kendell, and by Spitzer and Williams. While the two definitions are similar and available data support a distinct clinical syndrome of recurrent winter decrements of mood and energy, it is not yet clear whether what is identified as SP or SAD represents a distinct affective syndrome, a subtype of recurrent affective illness, or the most severe form of a widely distributed population trait. Several options for operationalized criteria sets are discussed.

Changes in norepinephrine output following light therapy for fall/winter seasonal depression

Recurrent fall/winter depressions that remit during spring and summer have been called Seasonal Affective Disorders (SAD) (Wehr and Rosenthal 1989). The pathophysiology of SAD, its relationship to nonseasonal affective disorders, and the mechanism of action of light therapy, which is effective in treating SAD, remain to be elucidated (Depue et al 1989; Jacobsen et al 1987; James et al 1986; Joseph-Vanderpool et al 1991; Skwerer et al 1988, Terman et al 1989). Norepinephrine (NE) may play a role in the mechanisms of action of many antidepressant treatments (Schildkraut 1965) that alter NE metabolism (Schildkraut et al 1964 and 1965) and decrease the urinary output of NE and its metabolites, i.e., "whole-body NE turnover" (WBNET) (Golden et al 1988; Potter et al 1988). The present study explored whether light therapy also reduces the urinary output of NE and its metabolites.

Seasonality of admissions in the psychoses: effect of diagnosis, sex, and age at onset

A summer peak was found in first admissions to hospitals in England and Wales between 1976 and 1986 for both affective psychoses and schizophrenia, but not for neurotic conditions or personality disorders. There was no significant relationship between age at first admission and season of admission. The summer peak was most prominent for mania, where it was present in both sexes; for schizophrenia, it was present only in females. These findings suggest that schizophrenia in females, and mania in both sexes, have some aetiological or precipitating factor in common.

Effects of bright artificial light on monoamines and neuropeptides in eight different brain regions compared in a pigmented and nonpigmented rat strain

Seasonal affective disorder is a form of depression which recurs at the same time of the year. Exposure to bright artificial light at a dose of 2,500 lux is used to treat seasonal affective disorders. We exposed a pigmented (Brown Norway) and a nonpigmented (Sprague-Dawley) rat strain with bright artificial light for 21 days at two doses (2,500 and 6,100 lux) and analyzed dopamine, dihydroxyphenyl-acetic acid, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and 5-hydroxyindole-acetic acid (5-HIAA) by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and electrochemical detection in eight different brain regions. Furthermore, we measured tissue levels of substance P (SP), neurokinins (NK), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) with radioimmunoassay. Our data obtained with light microscopy show that bright artificial light at both doses induced a massive destruction of photoreceptors in the retina of albino rats but not of the pigmented rat strain. Retinal lesion of photoreceptors resulted in increased tissue levels of all measured neuropeptides except SP in the hypothalamus and increased VIP in the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra. Furthermore, increased 5-HT and 5-HIAA tissue levels were found in the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra. In contrast, in the frontal cortex there was a significant reduction in 5-HIAA tissue levels and a decreased 5-HIAA/5-HT ratio, indicating decreased 5-HT metabolism. Light exposure of the pigmented rat strain revealed no changes in the measured biogenic amines and neuropeptides in any investigated brain region. Our data suggest that retinal lesion but not direct visual neurotransmission induced changes in neurotransmitters in some brain regions. We conclude that Brown Norway rats but not Sprague-Dawley rats are useful to study neurochemical effects of bright artificial light. However, Sprague-Dawley rats may be a useful tool to study biochemical mechanisms of photoreceptor damage by bright light.

Blood serotonin, serum melatonin and light therapy in healthy subjects and in patients with nonseasonal depression

The 24-h rhythms of blood serotonin and serum melatonin were determined in 39 unmediated inpatients with nonseasonal affective disorder and in 14 healthy men and women after 7 days of morning bright-light (2500 lx) or dim-light (50 lx) treatment. Bright-light treatment led to a more than 50% decrease in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score in 4/19 patients and dim light in 1/17 patients. After light treatment the mesor (the daily mean estimated by cosinor analysis) of patients' and subjects' melatonin levels did not change significantly, nor was there a correlation between phase change and decrease in HRSD score. We observed after bright- and dim-light treatment a consistent increase in blood serotonin in patients and healthy subjects, which differed significantly between healthy subjects and patients. These findings suggest the involvement of serotonergic mechanisms following light therapy.

Phototherapy with broad spectrum white fluorescent light: a comparative study

The principles of photobiology suggest that the antidepressant effect of phototherapy depends on the dose and spectrum of light. We investigated the effect of spectrum by comparing two broad spectrum fluorescent light sources with different spectral distributions. In a crossover design, 11 patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) were treated with broad spectrum fluorescent and cool white light for 7 days. Scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were reduced from 22.5 to 8.1 with broad spectrum fluorescent light and from 23.5 to 8.8 with cool white light. The results suggest that both light sources are effective treatments.

The effects of ultraviolet-A wavelengths in light therapy for seasonal depression

Although light therapy is a recognized effective treatment for seasonal affective disorder (SAD), there has been little research into the critical wavelengths of light that produce the antidepressant effect. Previous studies found conflicting results for the importance of the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum in the therapeutic effect of light therapy. To assess the clinical effects of UV-A wavelengths (315-400 nm), we studied 33 depressed SAD patients diagnosed with structured interviews by DSM-IIIR criteria. Following a baseline week, patients underwent 2 weeks of 2500 lux light therapy for 2 h daily (06:00-08:00). Light therapy consisted of cool-white fluorescent light with the addition of a special UV-A fluorescent tube. Patients were randomized to wear glasses during light therapy that either blocked (UV-blocked condition) or passed (UV-A condition) wavelengths below 400 nm. Both treatments significantly reduced all depression ratings, but no differences were found between the UV-A and UV-blocked conditions. We conclude that the UV-A spectrum does not increase the antidepressant response of light therapy. Given the potential side effects of chronic UV exposure, clinical application of light therapy should use light sources that have the UV spectrum filtered.

Controlled trial of bright light for nonseasonal major depressive disorders

Psychotropic drug-free hospitalized veterans with nonseasonal major depressive disorders or depressed forms of bipolar disorder were treated with light for 1 week. Twenty-five patients were randomly assigned to bright white light treatment (2000-3000 lux), and 26 patients were randomized to dim red light placebo control treatment. Unlike those treated with dim red light, those treated with bright white light showed declines in three measures of depression during treatment. Partial relapse appeared within 2 days. A global depression score showed a statistically significant (p = 0.02) difference favoring bright white light treatment. Two bright-light-treated patients became mildly hypomanic, but side effects were mild. Improvement was not correlated with patient expectations; indeed, patients expected somewhat greater benefit from the placebo. Patients treated in summer responded as well as those treated in winter. Baseline electroencephalogram (EEG) sleep stage data (e.g., rapid eye movement; REM latency) did not predict treatment responses. These 1-week treatment results suggest that bright light might produce benefits for patients with nonseasonal depression. Bright light should not be recommended for routine clinical application before additional assessments with longer treatment durations are done.

Seasonal affective disorder in adolescence

Two adolescent girls with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) are described. It is suggested that the classic symptom profile seen in adults is not characteristic in younger subjects. Although hypersomnia is prominent, increased appetite and carbohydrate craving are rarely reported. Local meteorological data link the course of the disorder in one case to the hours of sunshine and ambient temperature during the winter months.

Seasonal affective disorder, Part II: Phototherapy, an expanded role of the psychosocial nurse

The integration of neurobiology into the research and practice of psychosocial nursing is an imperative for the decade of the 1990s. This substantial goal probably will be achieved through the completion of smaller endeavors. This article is intended to be one such contribution. The purpose of this article are threefold. First, it will introduce the psychosocial nurse to the characteristics of Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD). This article also will provide the psychosocial nurse with the putative biological basis of SAD and phototherapy. Finally, specific information regarding the therapeutic application of bright light is provided.

Atypical depressive symptoms possibly predict responsiveness to phototherapy in seasonal affective disorder

Phototherapy was administered to 24 depressed patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD), of which 62%, 24%, and 14%, respectively, showed improvements of greater than or equal to 50%, 25-50%, and less than 25% based on the Hamilton rating scale for depression for SAD (HAMSAD). No patients showed aggravation or side effects. Although the improvement rate in HAMSAD correlated significantly with the pretreatment severity of atypical symptoms of depression, it did not correlate with that of typical symptoms. This suggests that phototherapy is a useful treatment in SAD and that responsiveness to phototherapy in SAD can possibly be predicted by the atypical depressive symptoms before treatment.

Can winter depression be prevented by light treatment?

The administration of light at the development of the first signs of a winter depression appears to prevent it from developing into a full-blown depression. No patient from a group of 10 treated in this way developed any signs of depression during the rest of the winter season, while five of seven patients from a control group became depressed and needed treatment during the winter season.

Phototherapy in nonseasonal depression

Previous reports have shown that bright light exposure may benefit patients with seasonal depression. In the present study, the possible therapeutic effect of bright light in nonseasonal major depressive disorder was examined. Forty-two depressed patients not receiving additional antidepressant medication were exposed to bright white light of 2500 lux or dim red light of 50 lux over one week for two hr daily in the morning. The change in depressive symptoms was assessed by rating scales (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, CGI) and by self-rating scales (Depression Scale, Complaint List, Visual Analogue Scale). Consistent for all ratings, the decrease in depressive symptoms after bright white light was only slight and not different from dim red-light exposure. Contrary to the findings in seasonal affective disorder, phototherapy administered over one week for two hr daily is not effective in nonseasonal major depressive disorder.

Effect of phototherapy on 3H-imipramine binding sites in patients with SAD, non-SAD and in healthy controls

The effect of incandescent light treatment on the density of 3H-imipramine binding sites (Bmax) was investigated in 17 patients with seasonal affective disorder, in eight patients with non-seasonal depression and in six healthy volunteers. A significant increase in mean Bmax value parallel to a marked improvement of the depressive symptoms was found only in patients with SAD. No effect was observed either on mean Bmax value or on clinical symptoms in patients with non-SAD and on mean Bmax value in healthy volunteers.

Diurnal variation of symptoms in seasonal affective disorder

The classic melancholic pattern of depressive symptoms being worse in the morning was present in 3/4 of a sample of 47 seasonal affective disorder patients (SAD), as assessed by global ratings and self-ratings of diurnal variation (DV). The type of DV did not predict response to light, but it did predict relapse within a week: Only those SAD patients with symptoms worse in the evening or no DV did so.

Morning or evening bright light treatment of winter depression? The significance of hypersomnia

In a randomized crossover design 19 patients with winter depression were treated with 7 days of bright morning light (6:00 to 8:00 AM) and 7 days of evening light (7:00 to 9:00 PM). Bright light in the morning reduced the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score from 22.3 to 5.5; bright light in the evening decreased the Hamilton score from 21.0 to 12.2. Improvement in the depression as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating scores was greater with morning light compared with evening lights. Hypersomnia was associated (p less than 0.05) with a superior response to morning light.

Is seasonal affective disorder a variant of atypical depression? Differential response to light therapy

Similar symptomatology has been described for both seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and atypical depression. For example, hyperphagia, hypersomnia, and intense lethargy are common to both, suggesting that they might be subtypes of the same disorder. If SAD and atypical depression are different manifestations of the same underlying pathophysiology, treatment effective for one might also benefit the other. Bright artificial lights (2500 lux, 6-8 a.m. and p.m.) were significantly less effective in treating eight patients diagnosed as having atypical depression without a seasonal pattern than 25 SAD patients. Differential treatment outcome suggests that SAD and atypical depression are separate disorders.

Seasonal affective disorder, the depression of winter: a literature review and description from a nursing perspective

This article presents a literature review and description of seasonal affective disorder (SAD). SAD is a newly recognized disorder, differentiated from other affective illnesses by its seasonality (with midwinter dysthymia and spring/summer remission), and its atypical symptoms of hypersomnia and hyperphagia. SAD symptoms remit with travel towards the equator or with bright light treatments, possibly indicating a chronobiological circadian etiology. This article introduces aspects of SAD that are amenable to the nursing process, including assessment of the seasonality of dysthymic symptoms; diagnoses of patient responses; referral, education, and psychotherapeutic interventions; and evaluation of patient responses to interventions. Since SAD is found predominantly in young women, and because symptoms may be exacerbated by rotating shifts, it is possible that nurses may have a higher incidence of SAD, compared with other professions.

Sleep deprivation in bright and dim light: antidepressant effects on major depressive disorder

Twenty-three patients with a major depressive disorder were deprived of a night's sleep twice weekly, one week staying up in the dimly lit living room of the ward (less than 60 lux), and one week in a brightly lit room (greater than 2000 lux). Immediate, but transient beneficial effects of sleep deprivation were observed primarily in eight patients (the 'responders'). The immediate effects did not differ greatly for the two conditions, indicating that exposure to light at night is an implausible explanation for the antidepressant effects of total sleep deprivation. There was some evidence that the bright light condition led to a more prolonged improvement of the responders.

Effect of bright white light therapy on non-seasonal depressive disorder. Preliminary results

In this study, the effect of bright white light (2500 lux) and dim light (50 lux) were assessed in 30 patients with non-seasonal major depressive disorder randomly assigned to either procedure. Patients met RDC for major depressive disorder and ICD-9 criteria (296.1 and 296.3). During a 7-day period, the patients were exposed to bright white light (2500 lux) or dim light (50 lux) from 7.00 to 9.00 h daily. The severity of depression was assessed with observer scales (AMDP system, Hamilton depression scale, CGI) and through self-evaluation by self-rating scales (depression scale and list of complaints by von Zerssen). No difference was noted between bright light therapy and dim light, though a significant reduction of depressive symptomatology was observed for all patients during the study. These findings are discussed from a clinical point of view.

Is winter depression a bipolar disorder?

Sixty-one winter depressive patients were evaluated for evidence of bipolar illness. Using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version and the General Behavior Inventory, only nine (15%) could be considered bipolar. On prospective evaluation of patients during the summer following winter depression, few showed signs of manic or hypomanic symptoms. Also, few patients had a family history of bipolar illness. When patients were asked to evaluate symptoms of winter depression, lack of energy was found to be the most prominent feature of the syndrome.