Effects of neuropeptide FF analogs on morphine analgesia in the nucleus raphe dorsalis

Intracerebroventricular Neuropeptide FF Diminishes the Number of Apneas and Cardiovascular Effects Produced by Opioid Receptors' Activation

The opioid-induced analgesia is associated with a number of side effects such as addiction, tolerance and respiratory depression. The involvement of neuropeptide FF (NPFF) in modulation of pain perception, opioid-induced tolerance and dependence was well documented in contrast to respiratory depression. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the potency of NPFF to block post-opioid respiratory depression, one of the main adverse effects of opioid therapy. Urethane-chloralose anaesthetized Wistar rats were injected either intravenously (iv) or intracerebroventricularly (icv) with various doses of NPFF prior to iv endomorphin-1 (EM-1) administration. Iv NPFF diminished the number of EM-1-induced apneas without affecting their length and without influence on the EM-1 induced blood pressure decline. Icv pretreatment with NPFF abolished the occurrence of post-EM-1 apneas and reduced also the maximal drop in blood pressure and heart rate. These effects were completely blocked by the NPFF receptor antagonist RF9, which was given as a mixture with NPFF before systemic EM-1 administration. In conclusion, our results showed that centrally administered neuropeptide FF is effective in preventing apnea evoked by stimulation of μ-opioid receptors and the effect was due to activation of central NPFF receptors. Our finding indicates a potential target for reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression.

The influence of a new derivate of kisspeptin-10 - Kissorphin (KSO) on the rewarding effects of morphine in the conditioned place preference (CPP) test in male rats

Kissorphin (KSO) is a new peptide derived from kisspeptin-10. Previous study has indicated that this peptide displays neuropeptide FF (NPFF)-like anti-opioid activity. Herein, we examined the influence of KSO (1; 3, and 10 nmol, intravenously [i.v.]), on the rewarding action of morphine (5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]), using the unbiased design of the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm in rats. To test the effect of KSO on the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP, KSO and morphine were co-injected during conditioning with no drugs treatment on the test day. To investigate the effect of KSO on the expression of morphine-induced CPP, morphine alone was given during the conditioning phase (1 × 3 days) and KSO was administered 5 min prior to the placement in the CPP apparatus on the test day. To estimate the influence of KSO on the reinstatement of morphine-induced CPP, KSO was given 5 min before a priming dose of morphine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) on the reinstatement test day. The results show that KSO inhibited the acquisition, expression and reinstatement of morphine-induced CPP. The strongest effect of KSO was observed at the dose of 10 nmol (acquisition and reinstatement) or 1 nmol (expression). KSO given alone, neither induced place preference, nor aversion. Furthermore, the morphine-modulating effects of KSO were markedly antagonized by pretreatment with RF9 (10 nmol, i.v.), the NPFF receptors selective antagonist. Thus, KSO inhibited the morphine-induced CPP mainly by involving specific activation of NPFF receptors. Overall, these data further support the anti-opioid character of KSO.

The role of orphan G protein-coupled receptors in the modulation of pain: A review

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise a large number of receptors. Orphan GPCRs are divided into six families. These groups contain orphan receptors for which the endogenous ligands are unclear. They have various physiological effects in the body and have the potential to be used in the treatment of different diseases. Considering their important role in the central and peripheral nervous system, their role in the treatment of pain has been the subject of some recent studies. At present, there are effective therapeutics for the treatment of pain including opioid medications and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, the side effects of these drugs and the risks of tolerance and dependence remain a major problem. In addition, neuropathic pain is a condition that does not respond to currently available analgesic medications well. In the present review article, we aimed to review the most recent findings regarding the role of orphan GPCRs in the treatment of pain. Accordingly, based on the preclinical findings, the role of GPR3, GPR7, GPR8, GPR18, GPR30, GPR35, GPR40, GPR55, GPR74, and GPR147 in the treatment of pain was discussed. The present study highlights the role of orphan GPCRs in the modulation of pain and implies that these receptors are potential new targets for finding better and more efficient therapeutics for the management of pain particularly neuropathic pain.

Heterologous regulation of Mu-opioid (MOP) receptor mobility in the membrane of SH-SY5Y cells

The dynamic organization of G protein-coupled receptors in the plasma membrane is suspected of playing a role in their function. The regulation of the diffusion mode of the mu-opioid (MOP) receptor was previously shown to be agonist-specific. Here we investigate the regulation of MOP receptor diffusion by heterologous activation of other G protein-coupled receptors and characterize the dynamic properties of the MOP receptor within the heterodimer MOP/neuropeptide FF (NPFF2) receptor. The data show that the dynamics and signaling of the MOP receptor in SH-SY5Y cells are modified by the activation of α2-adrenergic and NPFF2 receptors, but not by the activation of receptors not described to interact with the opioid receptor. By combining, for the first time, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching at variable radius experiments with bimolecular fluorescence complementation, we show that the MOP/NPFF2 heterodimer adopts a specific diffusion behavior that corresponds to a mix of the dynamic properties of both MOP and NPFF2 receptors. Altogether, the data suggest that heterologous regulation is accompanied by a specific organization of receptors in the membrane.

GRK2 protein-mediated transphosphorylation contributes to loss of function of μ-opioid receptors induced by neuropeptide FF (NPFF2) receptors

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) interacts with specific receptors to modulate opioid functions in the central nervous system. On dissociated neurons and neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y) transfected with NPFF receptors, NPFF acts as a functional antagonist of μ-opioid (MOP) receptors by attenuating the opioid-induced inhibition of calcium conductance. In the SH-SY5Y model, MOP and NPFF(2) receptors have been shown to heteromerize. To understand the molecular mechanism involved in the anti-opioid activity of NPFF, we have investigated the phosphorylation status of the MOP receptor using phospho-specific antibody and mass spectrometry. Similarly to direct opioid receptor stimulation, activation of the NPFF(2) receptor by [D-Tyr-1-(NMe)Phe-3]NPFF (1DMe), an analog of NPFF, induced the phosphorylation of Ser-377 of the human MOP receptor. This heterologous phosphorylation was unaffected by inhibition of second messenger-dependent kinases and, contrarily to homologous phosphorylation, was prevented by inactivation of G(i/o) proteins by pertussis toxin. Using siRNA knockdown we could demonstrate that 1DMe-induced Ser-377 cross-phosphorylation and MOP receptor loss of function were mediated by the G protein receptor kinase GRK2. In addition, mass spectrometric analysis revealed that the phosphorylation pattern of MOP receptors was qualitatively similar after treatment with the MOP agonist Tyr-D-Ala-Gly (NMe)-Phe-Gly-ol (DAMGO) or after treatment with the NPFF agonist 1DMe, but the level of multiple phosphorylation was more intense after DAMGO. Finally, NPFF(2) receptor activation was sufficient to recruit β-arrestin2 to the MOP receptor but not to induce its internalization. These data show that NPFF-induced heterologous desensitization of MOP receptor signaling is mediated by GRK2 and could involve transphosphorylation within the heteromeric receptor complex.

Modulation of neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptors influences the expression of amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference and amphetamine withdrawal anxiety-like behavior in rats

Many data indicate that endogenous opioid system is involved in amphetamine-induced behavior. Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) possesses opioid-modulating properties. The aim of the present study was to determine whether pharmacological modulation of NPFF receptors modify the expression of amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and amphetamine withdrawal anxiety-like behavior, both processes relevant to drug addiction/abuse. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of NPFF (5, 10, and 20 nmol) inhibited the expression of amphetamine CPP at the doses of 10 and 20 nmol. RF9, the NPFF receptors antagonist, reversed inhibitory effect of NPFF (20 nmol, i.c.v.) at the doses of 10 and 20 nmol and did not show any effect in amphetamine- and saline conditioned rats. Anxiety-like effect of amphetamine withdrawal was measured 24h after the last (14 days) amphetamine (2.5mg/kg, i.p.) treatment in the elevated plus-maze test. Amphetamine withdrawal decreased the percent of time spent by rats in the open arms and the percent of open arms entries. RF9 (5, 10, and 20 nmol, i.c.v.) significantly reversed these anxiety-like effects of amphetamine withdrawal and elevated the percent of time spent by rats in open arms at doses of 5 and 10 nmol, and the percent of open arms entries in all doses used. NPFF (20 nmol) pretreatment inhibited the effect of RF9 (10 nmol). Our results indicated that stimulation or inhibition of NPFF receptors decrease the expression of amphetamine CPP and amphetamine withdrawal anxiety, respectively. These findings may have implications for a better understanding of the processes involved in amphetamine dependence.

Neuropeptide FF receptors have opposing modulatory effects on nociception

The role of neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and its analogs in pain modulation is ambiguous. Although NPFF was first characterized as an antiopioid peptide, both antinociceptive and pronociceptive effects have been reported, depending on the route of administration. Currently, two NPFF receptors, termed FF1 and FF2, have been identified and cloned, but their roles in pain modulation remain elusive because of the lack of availability of selective compounds suitable for systemic administration in in vivo models. Ligand-binding studies confirm ubiquitous expression of both subtypes in brain, whereas only FF2 receptors are expressed spinally. This disparity in localization has served as the foundation of the hypothesis that FF1 receptors mediate the pronociceptive actions of NPFF. We have identified novel small molecule NPFF receptor agonists and antagonists with varying degrees of FF2/FF1 functional selectivity. Using these pharmacological tools in vivo has allowed us to define the roles of NPFF receptor subtypes as pertains to the modulation of nociception. We demonstrate that selective FF2 agonism does not modulate acute pain but instead ameliorates inflammatory and neuropathic pains. Treatment with a nonselective FF1/FF2 agonist potentiates allodynia in neuropathic rats and increases sensitivity to noxious thermal and to non-noxious mechanical stimuli in normal rats in an FF1 antagonist-reversible manner. Treatment with FF1 antagonists reversed established mechanical allodynia, indicating the possibility of increased NPFF tone through FF1 receptors. In conclusion, we provide evidence for the opposing roles of NPFF receptors and highlight selective FF2 agonism and/or selective FF1 antagonism as potential targets warranting further investigation.

Anti-opioid activities of NPFF1 receptors in a SH-SY5Y model

In order to elucidate the mechanisms of the neuronal anti-opioid activity of Neuropeptide FF, we have transfected the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line, which expresses mu- and delta-opioid receptors, with the human NPFF1 receptor. The SH1-C7 clone expresses high affinity NPFF1 receptors in the same range order of density as opioid receptors. Similarly to the opioids, acute stimulation with the NPFF1 agonist NPVF inhibits adenylyl cyclase activity and voltage-gated (N-type) Ca2+ currents and enhances the intracellular Ca2+ release triggered by muscarinic receptors activation. In contrast, preincubation of cells with NPVF decreases the response to opioids on both calcium signaling, thus reproducing the cellular anti-opioid activity described in neurons. SH1-C7 cells are therefore a suitable model to investigate the interactions between NPFF and opioid receptors.

A new member of the hypothalamic RF-amide peptide family, LPXRF-amide peptides: structure, localization, and function

Recently, we identified a novel hypothalamic neuropeptide with a C-terminal LPLRF-amide sequence in the quail brain. This avian neuropeptide was shown to inhibit gonadotropin release from the cultured anterior pituitary. This peptide is the first hypothalamic peptide that inhibited gonadotropin release reported in vertebrates. We, therefore, termed it gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH). After this finding, we found that GnIH-related peptides were present in the brains of other vertebrates, such as mammals, amphibians, and fish. These GnIH-related peptides possessed a LPXRF-amide (X=L or Q) motif at their C-termini in all investigated animals. Mass spectrometric analyses combined with immunoaffinity chromatography were powerful techniques for the identification of mature endogenous LPXRF-amide peptides. The identified LPXRF-amide peptides were found to be localized in the hypothalamus and brainstem areas, and to regulate pituitary hormone release. Subsequently, cDNAs that encode LPXRF-amide peptides were characterized in vertebrate brains. In this review, we summarize the identification, localization, and function of a new member of the hypothalamic RF-amide peptide family, LPXRF-amide peptides in vertebrates. Recent studies on the receptors for LPXRF-amide peptides will also be reviewed.

Comparison of pharmacological activities of Neuropeptide FF1 and Neuropeptide FF2 receptor agonists

The pharmacological effects of Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) analogs exhibiting different selectivities towards Neuropeptide FF1 (NPFF1) and Neuropeptide FF2 (NPFF2) receptors were investigated after supraspinal administration in mice. Injected into the third ventricle, VPNLPQRF-NH2, which is selective for Neuropeptide FF1 receptor induced a hypothermia while EFWSLAAPQRF-NH2 and SPAFLFQPQRF-NH2 which are selective for Neuropeptide FF2 receptor, did not. Furthermore, EFWSLAAPQRF-NH2 significantly increased the body temperature when compared to saline treated mice, indicating that Neuropeptide FF1 receptor could be responsible for hypothermia while Neuropeptide FF2 mediated an hyperthermic effect. After administration into the lateral ventricle, 1DMe ([D.Tyr1,(N.Me)Phe3]NPFF), a weakly selective Neuropeptide FF2 receptor agonist, exerted a clear anti-opioid effect in the tail flick test. The selective Neuropeptide FF1 receptor agonist VPNLPQRF-NH2 did not induce significant anti-opioid actions but rather increased, dose-dependently, morphine analgesia while EFWSLAAPQRF-NH2, the highest selective Neuropeptide FF2 receptor analog, induced the same pharmacological effect as VPNLPQRF-NH2 at comparable doses. These features indicate that the pro- and anti-opioid actions are not strictly related to the selectivity towards Neuropeptide FF2 or Neuropeptide FF1 receptor. Our data demonstrate that Neuropeptide FF1 and Neuropeptide FF2 receptors differently modulate nervous system functions.

Rodent strain differences in the NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density in the central nervous system

The present study evaluates the putative differences between NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density throughout the central nervous system between rat and mouse strains by using in vitro quantitative autoradiography. The binding of [125I]YVP ([125I]YVPNLPQRF-NH2) and [125I]EYF ([125I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH2), used to label NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptors, respectively, was compared between Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats and between Swiss and C57BL/6-SV129 mice. In contrast to Wistar, Sprague-Dawley brains contained NPFF1 binding sites in the cortical and spinal cord areas, the accumbens nucleus, the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus, the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, the inferior colliculus and the nucleus of the solitary tract. The distribution of NPFF2 binding sites was also different between the two strains of rats. As compared to Swiss, C57BL/6-SV129 mice showed higher basal NPFF2 receptor levels in cortical areas, telencephalon and some other regions. In contrast, they showed lower amounts in thalamic structures, except the reuniens nucleus, and in mesencephalic and rhombencephalic regions. In the cervical spinal cord the levels of NPFF2 receptors were similar. The NPFF1 binding levels were nearly the same in telencephalic structures while distinct in the forebrain. Differences in amount of NPFF receptor subtypes among these strains of rats or mice could lead to differences in NPFF control of opioid nociception.

Opposite alterations of NPFF1 and NPFF2 neuropeptide FF receptor density in the triple MOR/DOR/KOR-opioid receptor knockout mouse brains

Mice lacking the mu-delta-kappa-opioid receptor (MOR/DOR/KOR) genes and their corresponding wild-type littermates have been used to quantify NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) (neuropeptide FF) receptors by in vitro autoradiography in the central nervous tissues. Adjacent coronal sections were labelled with [125I]YVP ([125I]YVPNLPQRF-NH(2)) and [125I]EYF ([125I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH(2)) as specific radioligands for NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) receptors, respectively. NPFF(2) receptors are predominantly expressed in both genotypes, but their density increases significantly in non cortical regions of mutant mice: 64% in the amygdaloid area, 89, 308, 1214 and 49% in the nucleus of the vertical limb of the diagonal band, substantia nigra, the vestibular nucleus and the spinal cord, respectively. In contrast, the density of the NPFF(1) subtype is lower than NPFF(2) in both genotypes and significantly decreased in some brain areas of mutant mice: -99, -90 and -90% in the nucleus of the vertical limb of the diagonal band, substantia nigra and the spinal cord, respectively. This study shows that mice lacking opioid receptors have brain region-dependent increases (NPFF(2)) and decreases (NPFF(1)) in NPFF receptors densities and suggests a different functional participation of each NPFF receptor subtype in the actions of opioids.

Detailed distribution of neuropeptide FF receptors (NPFF1 and NPFF2) in the rat, mouse, octodon, rabbit, guinea pig, and marmoset monkey brains: a comparative autoradiographic study

The distribution of neuropeptide FF receptors (NPFF(1) and NPFF(2)) was analyzed throughout the central nervous system of rodents (rat, mouse, Octodon degus, and guinea pig), rabbit, and marmoset monkey brains, representing three orders of mammals. Quantitative in vitro receptor autoradiography with [(125)I]EYF ([(125)I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH(2)) and [(125)I]YVP ([(125)I]YVPNLPQRF-NH(2)) as specific radioligands for NPFF(2) and NPFF(1) receptors, respectively, was used. The NPFF(2) receptor is predominantly expressed in all species, except in the central nervous system of Octodon degus, in which it is undetectable. The density of the NPFF(1) subtype is low in rat and mice, moderate in octodon, rabbit, and monkey, and relatively high in the guinea pig. The present study reveals prominent species differences in the NPFF receptors expression in the brain. The distribution pattern of NPFF(2) receptors in the diencephalon and the superficial layers of the spinal cord is consistent with a hypothesized potential role for NPFF in the modulation of sensory input and opioid analgesia. In contrast, the constant presence of NPFF(1) receptors in the septum, the nucleus of the tractus solitarius, and the hypothalamus suggest its participation in neuroendocrine functions.

Anatomy and physiology of chronic pain

Although much has been accomplished in the past several decades, treatment of chronic pain remains imperfect. This article presents the anatomy and physiology of the pain system along with the neurobiologic changes that occur in the establishment and maintenance of chronic pain states.

Expression of neuropeptide FF, prolactin-releasing peptide, and the receptor UHR1/GPR10 genes during embryogenesis in the rat

Recently, several RF-amide peptides have been identified in mammals. These peptides have a similar C-terminal RF-motif and share some G-protein coupled receptors. Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and prolactin-releasing peptide (PrRP) are expressed in the same brain areas in the adult rat and act both in prolactin release and cardiovascular regulation. Here, we characterized the embryonal expression from embryonal day 14 to postnatal day 0 of both peptide mRNAs and the mRNA distribution of UHR1/GPR10-like receptor by using in situ hybridization (ISH) and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. NPFF mRNA was found in the spinal cord, caudal solitary tract nucleus, and surprisingly, in the medullary reticular formation. The only peripheral organs displaying NPFF mRNA expression were the lungs and the spleen. PrRP gene expression was seen in the caudal solitary tract nucleus, medullary reticular formation, pontine isthmus and liver, kidney, and testis. The receptor UHR1/GPR10 gene was expressed consistently in the medullary reticular formation and the adrenal gland but also transiently in several locations. All three genes showed weak but even ISH signal in the pituitary. These findings suggest different roles for the peptides during development and indicate that UHR1/GPR10-like receptor could also bind other ligands in addition to PrRP.

Quantitative autoradiographic distribution of NPFF1 neuropeptide FF receptor in the rat brain and comparison with NPFF2 receptor by using [125I]YVP and [(125I]EYF as selective radioligands

The selectivity of two new radioligands, [(125)I]YVP ([(125)I]YVPNLPQRF-NH(2)) and [(125)I]EYF ([(125)I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH(2)), for neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptor subtypes was determined using HEK293 cells expressing hNPFF(1) and CHO cells expressing hNPFF(2) receptors. Saturation binding and displacement experiments showed that [(125)I]YVP and [(125)I]EYF bound selectively with a very high affinity, K(D)=0.18 nM and 0.06 nM, to NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) receptors respectively. By using in vitro autoradiography with these radioligands and frog pancreatic polypeptide (PP) as selective unlabelled competitor of NPFF(2) binding sites, NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) receptor distribution was analyzed throughout the rat CNS. The highest densities of [(125)I]EYF binding sites were seen in the most external layers of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, laterodorsal thalamic nucleus and presubiculum of hippocampus. All specific binding of this radioligand was inhibited by 200 nM frog PP. The density of 0.1 nM [(125)I]YVP binding was much smaller in all brain areas and frog PP-insensitive binding sites (NPFF(1) receptor subtype) were detected in septal, thalamic and hypothalamic areas but were absent in the spinal cord. The restricted distribution of NPFF(1) receptors in the CNS supports its specific role in a limited number of neuronal functions. In contrast to the rat spinal cord where the NPFF(1) system is absent, there is no strict separation between NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) system at the supraspinal level.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Functional characterization of a human receptor for neuropeptide FF and related peptides

1. Neuropeptides FF (NPFF) and AF (NPAF) are involved in pain modulation and opioid tolerance. These peptides were known to act through uncharacterized G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). We describe here, using an aequorin-based assay as screening tool, that an orphan GPCR, previously designated HLWAR77, is a functional high affinity receptor for NPFF and related peptides. This receptor is further designated as NPFFR. 2. Binding experiments were performed with a new radioiodinated probe, [(125)I]-EYF, derived from the EFW-NPSF sequence of the rat NPFF precursor. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell membranes expressing NPFFR bound [(125)I]-EYF with a K(d) of 0.06 nM. Various NPFF analogues and related peptides inhibited [(125)I]-EYF specific binding with the following rank order (K(i)): human NPAF (0.22 nM), SQA-NPFF (0.29 nM), NPFF (0.30 nM), 1DMe (0.31 nM), EYW-NPSF (0.32 nM), QFW-NPSF (0.35 nM), 3D (1.12 nM), Met-enk-RF-NH(2) (3.25 nM), FMRF-NH(2) (10.5 nM) and NPSF (12.1 nM). 3. The stimulatory activity of the same set of peptides was measured by a functional assay based on the co-expression of NPFFR, G(alpha 16) and apoaequorin. The rank order of potency was consistent with the results of the binding assay. 4. Membranes from NPFFR expressing CHO cells bound GTP gamma[(35)S] in the presence of SQA-NPFF. This functional response was prevented by pertussis toxin treatment, demonstrating the involvement of G(i) family members. 5. SQA-NPFF inhibited forskolin induced cyclic AMP accumulation in recombinant CHO cells in a dose dependent manner. This response was abolished as well by pertussis toxin pre-treatment. 6. RT -- PCR analysis of human tissues mRNA revealed that expression of NPFFR was mainly detected in placenta, thymus and at lower levels in pituitary gland, spleen and testis.

Neuropeptide FF selectively attenuates the effects of nociceptin on acutely dissociated neurons of the rat dorsal raphe nucleus

Intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) was measured in neurons, acutely dissociated from the rat dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), with the fluorescent calcium probe Fluo3. Nociceptin (300 nM) had no effect on resting [Ca2+]i but reduced the magnitude of the [Ca2+]i transient triggered by depolarization in 90% of neurons having polygonal or fusiform perikarya. In 94% of neurons with the same morphology 5-HT (30 microM) also reduced the magnitude of the [Ca2+]i transient. The selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist 4-iodo-N-[2-[4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-ben zamide hydrochloride (p-MPPI) (0.4 microM) strongly attenuated (by 72+/-7%, n=4) this effect. The responses to nociceptin and 5-HT were not affected by BaCl2 (100 microM). The neuropeptide FF analog [D-Tyr1, (N-Me)Phe3]NPFF (1DMe) altered neither the resting [Ca2+]i nor the [Ca2+]i transient triggered by depolarization but dose-dependently decreased the effect of nociceptin (EC50=1.8 nM, maximal reduction: 68+/-5%). 1DMe had no effect on the response to 5-HT. Another neuropeptide FF analog, exhibiting a different pharmacological activity in mice and rats, [D-Tyr1, D-Leu2, D-Phe3]NPFF (1 microM) also reduced the effect of nociceptin by 74+/-11% (n=4). Few neurons (5 out of 42), either with polygonal/fusiform or smaller ovoid cell bodies, responded to the mu-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2, (N-Me)Phe4, Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAGO) with a decrease in the depolarization-induced [Ca2+]i transient. 1DMe (100 nM) attenuated this response by 69+/-14%. These results suggest that, at the cellular level, neuropeptide FF selectively counteracts the effects of opioid receptor activation.

Effects of (1DMe)NPYF, a synthetic neuropeptide FF analogue, in different pain models

The antinociceptive effects of intrathecal (IT) (1DMe)NPYF were studied in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. (1DMe)NPYF produced dose-dependent antinociception that was reduced by subcutaneous injection of naloxone. (1DMe)NPYF (0.5 nmol) also potentiated the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal morphine 7.8 nmol. This suggests that the antinociceptive effects of (1DMe)NPYF are partially mediated by opioid receptor activation. In carrageenan inflammation, 5-10 nmol of (1DMe)NPYF was effective against both thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia. In the neuropathic pain model, the lowest dose tested (0.5 nmol) showed antiallodynic effects against cold allodynia. The results suggest a potential role for (1DMe)NPYF in the treatment of pain including neuropathic pain.

Anti-opioid efficacy of neuropeptide FF in morphine-tolerant mice

The modulatory effects of 1DMe (d-Tyr-Leu-(NMe)Phe-Gln-Pro-Gln-Arg-Phe-NH2), an agonist of Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptors, on opioid antinociceptive activity have been compared in naive and tolerant mice in the tail-flick and the hot-plate tests. In naive mice, 1DMe alone had no effect on pain threshold but decreased dose-dependently (3-22 nmol) the analgesic activity of morphine in both tests. In tolerant mice, injections of 60-fold lower doses of 1DMe (0.05-0.5 nmol) reverse morphine-induced analgesia in the tail-flick test but this anti-opioid effect was no longer observed with the highest doses of 1DMe tested (3-22 nmol). In the hot-plate test, the anti-opioid action of 1DMe was not detected, whatever doses tested. Neither the NPFF-like immunoreactivity content of spinal cord and of olfactory bulbs, nor the density of NPFF receptors in olfactory bulbs, were altered. These results indicate that a chronic morphine treatment modifies the pharmacological properties of NPFF but the type of pain test is crucial in determining NPFF effects.

A differential modulation of allodynia, hyperalgesia and nociception by neuropeptide FF in the periaqueductal gray of neuropathic rats: interactions with morphine and naloxone

The effect of neuropeptide FF in the periaqueductal gray on pain behaviour was studied in rats with a chronic neuropathy induced by unilateral ligation of two spinal nerves. Neuropeptide FF produced in a non-monotonic fashion a significant attenuation of tactile allodynia. The antiallodynic effect was not significantly modulated by naloxone administered systemically or intracerebrally. The dose of neuropeptide FF producing a significant antiallodynic effect was not antinociceptive in a test of mechanical or thermal nociception. The thermal antinociceptive effect induced by morphine administered in the periaqueductal gray was significantly attenuated by neuropeptide FF, whereas that induced by systemically administered morphine was not. The interaction of neuropeptide FF with intracerebrally or systemically administered morphine in a test of tactile allodynia was not significant. The results indicate that neuropeptide FF in the periaqueductal gray may produce a selective attenuation of tactile allodynia in neuropathic rats. This antiallodynic effect is at least partly independent of naloxone-sensitive opioid receptors. Furthermore, neuropeptide FF in the periaqueductal gray attenuates antinociception induced by intracerebrally but not systemically administered morphine.

Neuropeptide FF, pain and analgesia

Neuropeptide FF (Phe-Leu-Phe-Gln-Pro-Gln-Arg-Phe-NH2) and the octadecapeptide neuropeptide AF (Ala-Gly-Glu-Gly-Leu-Ser-Ser-Pro-Phe-Trp-Ser-Leu-Ala-Ala-Pro-Gln-Arg-Phe -NH2) were isolated from bovine brain, and were initially characterized as anti-opioid peptides. They can oppose the acute effects of opioids and an increase in their brain concentrations may be responsible for the development of tolerance and dependence to opioids. Numerous experiments suggest a possible neuromodulatory role for neuropeptide FF. A precursor protein has been identified, in particular in human brain. Neuropeptide FF immunoreactive neurons are present only in the medial hypothalamus, and the nucleus of the solitary tract, and in the spinal cord in the superficial layers of the dorsal horn and areas around the central canal. Depolarization induces a Ca2+-dependent release of neuropeptide FF immunoreactivity from the spinal cord. Neuropeptide FF acts through stimulation of its own receptors and high densities of specific binding sites are found in regions related either to sensory input and visceral functions or to the processing of nociceptive messages. In both isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons and CA1 pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus, neuropeptide FF has little effect of its own but reverses the effects of mu-opioid receptor agonists. In agreement with the hypothesized anti-opioid role of neuropeptide FF, supraspinal injection lowers the nociceptive threshold and reverses morphine-induced analgesia in rats. Furthermore, immunoneutralization of neuropeptide FF increases endogenous and exogenous opioid-induced analgesia. Similarly, microinfusion of neuropeptide FF or neuropeptide FF analogs into the nucleus raphe dorsalis, the parafascicular nucleus, or the ventral tegmental area has no effect on the nociceptive threshold but inhibits the analgesia induced by co-injected morphine. Furthermore, infusion of neuropeptide FF into the parafascicular nucleus or the nucleus raphe dorsalis reverses the analgesic effect of morphine infused into the nucleus raphe dorsalis or the parafascicular nucleus, respectively, demonstrating remote interactions between neuropeptide FF and opioid systems. By contrast, intrathecal administration of neuropeptide FF analogs induces a long lasting, opioid-dependent analgesia and potentiates the analgesic effect of morphine. Analgesic effects of neuropeptide FF after supraspinal injection could also be observed, for example during nighttime. In young mice, (1DMe)Y8Famide (D.Tyr-Leu-(NMe)Phe-Gln-Pro-Gln-Arg-Phe-NH2), a neuropeptide FF analog, increases delta-opioid receptor-mediated analgesia. These findings indicate that neuropeptide FF constitutes a neuromodulatory neuronal system interacting with opioid systems, and should be taken into account as a participant of the homeostatic process controlling the transmission of nociceptive information.

Affinity of neuropeptide FF analogs to opioid receptors in the rat spinal cord

Several high-affinity analogs of neuropeptide FF (Phe-Leu-Phe-Gln-Pro-Gln-Arg-Phe-NH2, NPFF) exhibiting both supraspinal anti-opioid and spinal analgesic activities were studied for their abilities to interact with specific mu, delta, and kappa opioid binding in the rat spinal cord. Measurements by quantitative receptor autoradiography in the superficial layers of the spinal cord revealed that NPFF analogs tested have only a low affinity for opioid receptors since Ki values ranged from 5 to 400 microM. Taking into account the high efficacy of NPFF after intrathecal injection, these results indicate that analgesic effects of NPFF did not result from opioid receptor stimulation.

Hypothermic effects of neuropeptide FF analogues in mice

The effects of neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and its analogues on mouse body temperature were examined. In a thermoneutral environment, administration of NPFF (Phe-Leu-Phe-Gln-Pro-Gln-Arg-Phe-NH2), 1DMe ([D.Tyr1, (N.Me)Phe3] NPFF), and 3D ([D.Tyr1, D.Leu2, D.Phe3] NPFF) in the third ventricle produced marked hypothermia. The effect of 1DMe was dose-dependent, and 45 nmol decreased body temperature by 5.6 degrees C. This effect was more pronounced when mice were placed at 4 degrees C. Hypothermia was not reversed by naloxone, an opioid antagonist, and was not modified by morphine. After 5 days of chronic treatment with 1DMe, mice did not became tolerant to the hypothermic effect. These results indicate that central NPFF receptors may control body temperature independently from opioid functions.

Neuropeptide FF receptors control morphine-induced analgesia in the parafascicular nucleus and the dorsal raphe nucleus

The ability of (1DMe)Y8Fa (D.Tyr-Leu-(NMe)Phe-Gln-Pro-Gln-Arg-Phe-NH2), a selective neuropeptide FF analog resistant to enzymatic degradation, to control morphine-induced analgesia was investigated in rat after microinfusion into the dorsal raphe nucleus and the nucleus parafascicularis of the thalamus. Infusion of (1DMe)Y8Fa (2.5 nmol) in the nucleus raphe dorsalis did not modify the animal response in the tail-immersion test but significantly reversed analgesia induced by coinjected morphine (27 nmol). Similarly, (1DMe)Y8Fa (5 nmol) inhibited morphine effects in the hot-plate test after co-injection into the parafascicular nucleus. Furthermore, (1DMe)Y8Fa injected into the parafascicular nucleus attenuated analgesia induced by morphine injected into the nucleus raphe dorsalis and similarly, the neuropeptide FF analog in the nucleus raphe dorsalis decreased the effects of 27 nmol morphine injected in the parafascicular nucleus. The density of neuropeptide FF receptors did not decrease in the nucleus raphe dorsalis after lesion of serotonergic neurons by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine. However, after this lesion, (1DMe)Y8Fa injected in the nucleus raphe dorsalis was no longer able to modify analgesic effects of morphine in hot-plate and tail-immersion tests. Similarly, the serotonin (5-HT) depletion induced by a systemic administration of para-chlorophenylalanine did not modify morphine analgesia microinjected into the nucleus raphe dorsalis and the parafascicular nucleus but blocked the ability of (1DMe)Y8Fa to reverse morphine effects in both nuclei. These data show that neuropeptide FF exerts anti-opioid effects directly into both the nucleus raphe dorsalis and the parafascicular nucleus and acts also at distance on opioid functions. Furthermore, anti-opioid effects of neuropeptide FF require functional serotonergic neurons although neuropeptide FF receptors are not carried on these neurons.

Autoradiographic characterization of rat spinal neuropeptide FF receptors by using [125I][D.Tyr1, (NMe)Phe3]NPFF

The binding properties of neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptors were investigated in different laminae of the rat spinal cord by using quantitative autoradiography and [125I][D.Tyr1, (NMe)Phe3]NPFF as radioligand. In the superficial layers, the specific binding of [125I][D.Tyr1, (NMe)Phe3]NPFF was time-dependent, reversible, and saturable (KD = 0.1 nM). Preincubation of spinal sections increased the maximal number of [125I][D.Tyr1, (NMe)Phe3]NPFF binding sites. Bestatin, an inhibitor of aminopeptidases, increased significantly the apparent affinity of NPFF. Optimal binding of [125I][D.Tyr1, (NMe)Phe3]NPFF was observed in the presence of 120 mM NaCl in all laminae of the spinal cord. No significant differences were noted in the salt dependence in laminae I-II, IV-V, and X, and the pharmacological profile of [125I][D.Tyr1, (NMe)Phe3]NPFF binding was similar in each laminae. These results do not support the existence of NPFF receptors subtypes differentially localized in different area of the spinal cord. Our data reveal the effects of tissue treatments on binding characteristics of NPFF receptors and indicate that [125I][D.Tyr1, (NMe)Phe3]NPFF is a useful radioactive probe for the characterization of NPFF receptors in discrete brain areas.

Presence of neuropeptide FF receptors on primary afferent fibres of the rat spinal cord

A radioiodinated analogue of neuropeptide FF, [125I][D. Tyr1,(NMe) Phe3]neuropeptide FF, was used as a selective probe to label neuropeptide FF receptors in the rat spinal cord. Following neonatal capsaicin treatment, dorsal rhizotomy or sciatic nerve section, the distribution and possible alterations of spinal cord specific [125I][D.Tyr1,(NMe)Phe3]neuropeptide FF binding sites were evaluated using in vitro quantitative receptor autoradiography. In normal rats, the highest densities of sites were observed in the superficial layers of the dorsal horn (laminae I-II) whereas moderate to low amounts of labelling were seen in the deeper (III-VI) laminae, around the central canal, and in the ventral horn. Capsaicin-treated rats showed a bilateral decrease (47%) in [125I][D.Tyr1,(NMe)Phe3]neuropeptide FF binding in all spinal areas. Unilateral sciatic nerve section and unilateral dorsal rhizotomy induced significant depletions (15-27%) in [125I][D.Tyr1,(NMe)Phe3]neuropeptide FF labelling in the ipsilateral dorsal horn. These results suggest that a proportion of neuropeptide FF receptors is located on primary afferent terminals of the dorsal horn and could thus play a role in the modulation of nociceptive transmission.