An algorithm for tight glycaemic control in diabetic infarct survivors

Implementing Intensive Insulin Therapy: Development and Audit of the Bath Insulin Protocol

Intensive insulin therapy to control blood glucose has been found to reduce mortality among critically ill patients in a surgical intensive care unit, though a simple prescriptive insulin infusion protocol to achieve this has not been published previously. This study documents the development and routine use of a simple prescriptive intravenous insulin infusion protocol for critically ill patients and compares the results with previous practice. During development the protocol was optimized and practical issues of implementation addressed. The optimized protocol was then used for all ICU admissions, and a prospectively defined retrospective chart audit performed for the first month of use. Results were compared with a similar time period the previous year. In September 2002, 27 admissions were started on the protocol. Blood glucose for the time on the protocol had a median value of 6.2 (IQR 5.9-7.1) mmol/l compared with 9.2 (IQR 8.1-10.2) mmol/l for those on insulin in 2001. Blood glucose for the whole ICU stay for those on the protocol in 2002 had a median value of 6.6 (IQR 6.0-7.4) mmol/l compared with 8.6 (IQR 8.0-9.4) mmol/l in 2001. Blood glucose for all ICU patients in 2002 had a median value of 6.5 (IQR 6.0-7.3) mmol/l compared with 7.2 (IQR 6.3-8.3) mmol/l in 2001.

Three blood glucose recordings were less than 2.2 mmol/l in September 2002. This study provides initial effectiveness and safety data for the Bath Insulin Protocol. Further audits in a larger patient population are now needed.

Intracerebral hemorrhage specific intensity of care quality metrics

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) care can vary among centers and previous studies have demonstrated differences in ICH outcome based on variations in patient care in various settings. The purpose of this paper is to present the design of an evidence-based dataset of elements of a new ICH specific intensity of care quality metrics.

METHODS

The articles were identified based on personal knowledge of the subject supplemented by data derived from multi-center randomized trials, and selected non-randomized or observational clinical studies. The information was identified with multiple searches on MEDLINE from 1986 through 2009. The current guidelines from American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association (ASA) Stroke Council and The European Stroke Initiative (EUSI) Writing Committee for management of ICH were reviewed extensively for identifying quality indicators and available scientific evidence. For certain elements where stroke-specific data was not available, data derived from other disease process with direct relevance was used.

RESULTS

A total of 26 quality indicators related to 18 facets of care with thresholds for quality response were identified. A pilot study was performed to asses and score 1300 (26 indicator per patientX25 patientsX2 raters) quality indicators. The minimum proportion of patients meeting quality parameter ranged from 44% to 100% depending upon the variable. The lowest performance scores were observed in the early intubation and mechanical ventilation, treatment of significant intracranial mass effect or transtentorial herniation, and timely acquisition of neuroimaging. The highest performance scores were seen in treatment of any seizure within 2 weeks of admission, status epilepticus, and prevention of gastric ulcer.

CONCLUSIONS

The next step in development of a new ICH specific intensity of care quality metrics is validation and refinement of the quality indicators and thresholds presented in the current report. Future activities may include selection and validation based on consensus of experts and application of the system to a large series of patients with ICH and assessment of relationship of components in isolation and as a group to outcome after severity adjustment.

The potential role of glucagon-like peptide-1 or its analogues in enhancing glycaemic control in critically ill adult patients

Intravenous insulin therapy is the gold standard therapy for glycaemic control in hyperglycaemic critically ill adult patients. However, hypoglycaemia remains a major concern in critically ill patients, even in some populations who are not receiving infused insulin. Furthermore, the influence of factors such as glycaemic variability and nutritional support may conceal any benefit of strict glycaemic control on morbidity and mortality in these patients. The recently revised guidelines of the American Diabetic Association/American College of Clinical Endocrinologists no longer advocate very tight glycaemic control or normalization of glucose levels in all critically ill patients. In the light of various concerns over the optimal glucose level and means to achieve such control, the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 or its analogues administered intravenously may represent an interesting therapeutic option.

Towards a feasible algorithm for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the literature

Introduction

Tight glycaemic control is an important issue in the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The glycaemic goals described by Van Den Berghe and colleagues in their landmark study of intensive insulin therapy appear difficult to achieve in a real life ICU setting. Most clinicians and nurses are concerned about a potentially increased frequency of severe hypoglycaemic episodes with more stringent glycaemic control. One of the steps we took before we implemented a glucose regulation protocol was to review published trials employing insulin/glucose algorithms in critically ill patients.

Methods

We conducted a search of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using the following terms: 'glucose', 'insulin', 'protocol', 'algorithm', 'nomogram', 'scheme', 'critically ill' and 'intensive care'. Our search was limited to clinical trials conducted in humans. The aim of the papers selected was required to be glycaemic control in critically ill patients; the blood glucose target was required to be 10 mmol/l or under (or use of a protocol that resulted in a mean blood glucose = 10 mmol/l). The studies were categorized according to patient type, desired range of blood glucose values, method of insulin administration, frequency of blood glucose control, time taken to achieve the desired range for glucose, proportion of patients with glucose in the desired range, mean blood glucose and frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes.

Results

A total of twenty-four reports satisfied our inclusion criteria. Most recent studies (nine) were conducted in an ICU; nine others were conducted in a perioperative setting and six were conducted in patients with acute myocardial infarction or stroke. Studies conducted before 2001 did not include normoglycaemia among their aims, which changed after publication of the study by Van Den Berghe and coworkers in 2001; glycaemic goals became tighter, with a target range between 4 and 8 mmol/l in most studies.

Conclusion

Studies using a dynamic scale protocol combining a tight glucose target and the last two blood glucose values to determine the insulin infusion rate yielded the best results in terms of glycaemic control and reported low frequencies of hypoglycaemic episodes.

Introducing intensive insulin therapy: the nursing perspective

Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) for the management of high blood glucose can reduce mortality and morbidity in the critically ill. However, there is little published literature on how to implement it successfully. The aim of this study is to chronicle the development and difficulties encountered in implementing an IIT protocol in a critical care unit in a district general hospital. A nurse-led protocol was developed. Qualitative audit was undertaken during development and implementation to identify potential problems with using the Bath Insulin Protocol. Regular feedback sessions were introduced to encourage change and further identify problem issues. Qualitative audit led to changes in practice for individual nurses and changes to other unit protocols. The main change for individual nurses was to measure blood glucose hourly using a bedside glucometer. The unit's feeding and drug dilution policies were identified as a potential cause of glucose instability and were modified. To implement IIT successfully, it is necessary to consider changing working practices and to identify other unit protocols which can cause glucose instability. The additional nursing workload must be considered and appropriate means of supporting staff identified.

Validation of a glucose-insulin-potassium infusion algorithm in hospitalized diabetic patients

OBJECTIVES

Validation of a novel glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion algorithm to optimize metabolic control in hospitalized diabetic patients.

SUBJECTS

We randomized 33 diabetic patients admitted to Sahlgrenska University Hospital with acute internal medicine diseases to either GIK infusion or multiple injection therapy (MIT). The GIK infusion rate and the MIT were controlled according to special algorithms. The treatment efficacy was evaluated through comparisons of capillary blood glucose eight times on day 2 of the study.

RESULTS

The GIK infusion led to significantly lower mean blood glucose when compared with MIT [10.1 (9.0-11.2) vs. 12.3 (9.3-14.4) mmol L(-1), median and interquartile range, P < 0.01]. Four episodes of hypoglycaemia without loss of consciousness were recorded in the GIK group whereas no hypoglycaemic event occurred in the MIT group. A mean of 1 (1-3) episodes of blood glucose levels above 12.0 mmol L(-1) were recorded in the GIK group compared with 3.5 (1.5-5.0) in the MIT group, P < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm used for the GIK infusion gave an acceptable level of metabolic control and this insulin infusion protocol is safe enough to be used by the nursing staff on a general internal medicine ward.

Intravenous insulin nomogram improves blood glucose control in the critically ill

OBJECTIVE

To improve control of blood glucose concentrations in critically ill patients through use of a bedside, nurse-managed, intravenous insulin nomogram.

DESIGN

Retrospective, before-after cohort study.

SETTING

Fifteen-bed mixed medical/surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary, teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 167 intensive care unit patients requiring intravenous insulin infusions during two 9-month periods.

INTERVENTION

The sliding scale group was treated using ad hoc sliding scale infusion therapy. The intervention group was treated using a dosing nomogram that allowed the nurse to adjust the insulin infusion rate based on current glucose concentration and concurrent insulin infusion rates. The adjustments were made independent of physician input.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Time from initiating the insulin infusion to initial control of glucose concentration (<11.5 mmol/L) was determined. Effectiveness of glucose control was determined retrospectively by measuring the area under the curve of blood concentrations >11.5 mmol/L versus time of insulin infusion, divided by total duration of insulin infusion. The median time to initial control of glucose (<11.5 mmol/L) was 4 hr (range 1-38 hr) for the baseline and 2 hr (range 1-22 hr) for nomogram group (p =.0004). The median area under the curve of glucose concentration divided by duration of insulin infusion was 0.9 (range 0.0-5.9) for sliding scale group and 0.3 (range 0.0-11.1) for nomogram (p =.0001), without any increase in the frequency of episodes of hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Use of an insulin nomogram in critically ill patients improves control of blood glucose concentrations and is safe.

Relationship between diabetes mellitus and long-term survival after coronary bypass and angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Recent subgroup analyses of randomized trials have suggested that percutaneous intervention in diabetic patients with multivessel disease results in higher mortality than coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We studied the relationship between diabetes and survival after revascularization in a large prospective cohort of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

By analyzing data for 3220 patients (24% diabetic) with symptomatic two- or three-vessel coronary disease who were undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or CABG at Duke University Medical Center between 1984 and 1990, we found that at 5 years, unadjusted survival in the group of patients undergoing CABG was 74% in diabetics and 86% in nondiabetics. Similarly, 5-year survival among PTCA patients was 76% in diabetics and 88% in patients without diabetes. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, diabetic patients receiving either PTCA or CABG had significantly poorer survival than nondiabetics (chi2=43.56, P<.0001). Unlike previous studies, however, there was no significant differential effect of diabetes on outcome between patients treated with PTCA and those treated with CABG (chi2=0.01, P=.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Although diabetes was associated with a worse long-term outcome after both PTCA and CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, the effect of diabetes on prognosis was similar in both treatment groups. Thus, our findings support the concept that the choice of initial revascularization strategy should not be based exclusively on a history of diabetes but rather should rely on other factors, such as angiographic suitability and clinical status.