Embryonic limb development in Drosophila

The wing and the eye: a parsimonious theory for scaling and growth control?

How a developing organ grows and patterns to its final shape is an important question in developmental biology. Studies of growth and patterning in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc have identified a key player, the morphogen Decapentaplegic (Dpp). These studies provided insights into our understanding of growth control and scaling: expansion of the Dpp gradient correlated with the growth of the tissue. A recent report on growth of a Drosophila organ other than the wing, the eye imaginal disc, prompts a reconsideration of our models of growth control. Despite striking differences between the two, the Dpp gradient scales with the target tissues of both organs and the growth of both the wing and the eye is controlled by Dpp. The goal of this review is to discuss whether a parsimonious model of scaling and growth control can explain the relationship between the Dpp gradient and growth in these two different developmental systems.

Axes, boundaries and coordinates: the ABCs of fly leg development

Recent studies of gene expression in the developing fruitfly leg support a model--Meinhardt's Boundary Model--which seems to contradict the prevailing paradigm for pattern formation in the imaginal discs of Drosophila--the Polar Coordinate Model. Reasoning from geometric first principles, this article examines the strengths and weaknesses of these hypotheses, plus some baffling phenomena that neither model can comfortably explain. The deeper question at issue is: how does the fly's genome encode the three-dimensional anatomy of the adult? Does it demarcate territories and boundaries (as in a geopolitical map) and then use those boundaries and their points of intersection as a scaffolding on which to erect the anatomy (the Boundary Model)? Or does it assign cellular fates within a relatively seamless coordinate system (the Polar Coordinate Model)? The existence of hybrid Cartesian-polar models shows that the alternatives may not be so clear-cut: a single organ might utilize different systems that are spatially superimposed or temporally sequential.

Localization of thoracic imaginal-disc precursor cells in the early embryo of Drosophila melanogaster

Our previous cell lineage analysis of the thoracic disc primordia of Drosophila showed that at the blastoderm and early gastrula stage, cells are not yet committed to form either larval or imaginal tissue (Meise and Janning, 1993). We have now refined our studies on the cell lineage and have mapped the imaginal primordia in the thoracic region. Homotopic transplantations of single cells within the thoracic region of blastoderm and early gastrula stages show that the precursor cells of thoracic imaginal discs are locally restricted to a small lateral area of the thoracic region. Clones labelling leg discs frequently included the Keilin's organs. Heterotopic transplantations along the dorsoventral axis indicate that cells within the thoracic region are not yet committed with respect to larval or imaginal tissue, their fate being dependent on the position where the transplanted cell had been deposited. On the other hand, cells taken from the abdominal anlagen and transplanted into the region of thoracic disc primordia could not participate in the formation of imaginal discs. This shows that, in contrast to the dorsoventral axis, determinative events had separated primordia along the anterior-posterior axis.

wingless acts through the shaggy/zeste-white 3 kinase to direct dorsal-ventral axis formation in the Drosophila leg

The secreted glycoproteins encoded by Wnt genes are thought to function as intercellular signaling molecules which convey positional information. Localized expression of Wingless protein is required to specify the fate of ventral cells in the developing Drosophila leg. We report here that Wingless acts through inactivation of the shaggy/zeste white 3 protein kinase to specify ventral cell fate in the leg. Ectopic expression of Wingless outside its normal ventral domain has been shown reorganize the dorsal-ventral axis of the leg in a non-autonomous manner. Using genetic mosaics, we show that cells that lack shaggy/zeste white 3 activity can influence the fate of neighboring cells to reorganize dorsal-ventral pattern in the leg, in the same manner as Wingless-expressing cells. Therefore, clones of cells that lack shaggy/zeste white 3 activity exhibit all of the organizer activity previously attributed to Wingless-expressing cells, but do so without expressing wingless. We also show that the organizing activity of ventral cells depends upon the location of the clone along the dorsal-ventral axis. These findings suggest that Wingless protein does not function as a morphogen in the dorsal-ventral axis of the leg.