Receptor heterogeneity of human breast cancer as measured by multiple intratumoral assays of estrogen and progesterone receptor

Ultrasound-based radiomics model for predicting molecular biomarkers in breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and is highly heterogeneous. BC can be classified into four molecular subtypes based on the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and proliferation marker protein Ki-67. However, they can only be obtained by biopsy or surgery, which is invasive. Radiomics can noninvasively predict molecular expression via extracting the image features. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of data available regarding the prediction of molecular biomarker expression using ultrasound (US) images in BC.

Objectives

To investigate the prediction performance of US radiomics for the assessment of molecular profiling in BC.

Methods

A total of 342 patients with BC who underwent preoperative US examination between January 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. They were confirmed by pathology and molecular subtype analysis of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67. The radiomics features were extracted and four molecular models were constructed through support vector machine (SVM). Pearson correlation coefficient heatmaps are employed to analyze the relationship between selected features and their predictive power on molecular expression. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used for the prediction performance of US radiomics in the assessment of molecular profiling.

Results

359 lesions with 129 ER- and 230 ER+, 163 PR- and 196 PR+, 265 HER2- and 94 HER2+, 114 Ki-67- and 245 Ki-67+ expression were included. 1314 features were extracted from each ultrasound image. And there was a significant difference of some specific radiomics features between the molecule positive and negative groups. Multiple features demonstrated significant association with molecular biomarkers. The area under curves (AUCs) were 0.917, 0.835, 0.771, and 0.896 in the training set, while 0.868, 0.811, 0.722, and 0.706 in the validation set to predict ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 expression respectively.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-based radiomics provides a promising method for predicting molecular biomarker expression of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in BC.

The complex nature of heterogeneity and its roles in breast cancer biology and therapeutic responsiveness

Heterogeneity is a complex feature of cells and tissues with many interacting components. Depending on the nature of the research context, interacting features of cellular, drug response, genetic, molecular, spatial, temporal, and vascular heterogeneity may be present. We describe the various forms of heterogeneity with examples of their interactions and how they play a role in affecting cellular phenotype and drug responses in breast cancer. While cellular heterogeneity may be the most widely described and invoked, many forms of heterogeneity are evident within the tumor microenvironment and affect responses to the endocrine and cytotoxic drugs widely used in standard clinical care. Drug response heterogeneity is a critical determinant of clinical response and curative potential and also is multifaceted when encountered. The interactive nature of some forms of heterogeneity is readily apparent. For example, the process of metastasis has the properties of both temporal and spatial heterogeneity within the host, whereas each individual metastatic deposit may exhibit cellular, genetic, molecular, and vascular heterogeneity. This review describes the many forms of heterogeneity, their integrated activities, and offers some insights into how heterogeneity may be understood and studied in the future.

Heterogeneity and tumor evolution reflected in liquid biopsy in metastatic breast cancer patients: a review

Breast cancer is a spatially and temporally dynamic disease in which differently evolving genetic clones are responsible for progression and clinical outcome. We review tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution from studies comparing primary tumors and metastasis and discuss plasma circulating tumor DNA as a powerful real-time approach for monitoring the clonal landscape of breast cancer during treatment and recurrence. We found only a few early studies exploring clonal evolution and heterogeneity through analysis of multiregional tissue biopsies of different progression steps in comparison with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood plasma. The model of linear progression seemed to be more often reported than the model of parallel progression. The results show complex routes to metastasis, however, and plasma most often reflected metastasis more than primary tumor. The described patterns of evolution and the polyclonal nature of breast cancer have clinical consequences and should be considered during patient diagnosis and treatment selection. Current studies focusing on the relevance of clonal evolution in the clinical setting illustrate the role of liquid biopsy as a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring clonal progression and response to treatment. In the clinical setting, circulating tumor DNA may be an ideal support for tumor biopsies to characterize the genetic landscape of the metastatic disease and to improve longitudinal monitoring of disease dynamics and treatment effectiveness through detection of residual tumor after resection, relapse, or metastasis within a particular patient.

Chemokines in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Heterogeneity: New Challenges for Clinical Implications

Tumor heterogeneity is a hallmark of cancer and one of the primary causes of resistance to therapies. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which accounts for 15% to 20% of all breast cancers and is the most aggressive subtype, is very diverse, connected to metastatic potential and response to therapy. It is a very diverse disease at the molecular, pathologic, and clinical levels. TNBC is substantially more likely to recur and has a worse overall survival rate following diagnosis than other breast cancer subtypes. Chemokines, low molecular weight proteins that stimulate chemotaxis, have been shown to control the cues responsible for TNBC heterogeneity. In this review, we have focused on tumor heterogeneity and the role of chemokines in modulating tumor heterogeneity, since this is the most critical issue in treating TNBC. Additionally, we examined numerous cues mediated by chemokine networks that contribute to the heterogeneity of TNBC. Recent developments in our knowledge of the chemokine networks that regulate TNBC heterogeneity may pave the door for developing difficult-to-treat TNBC treatment options.

Heterogeneity in Signaling Pathway Activity within Primary and between Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer

Targeted therapy aims to block tumor-driving signaling pathways and is generally based on analysis of one primary tumor (PT) biopsy. Tumor heterogeneity within PT and between PT and metastatic breast lesions may, however, impact the effect of a chosen therapy. Whereas studies are available that investigate genetic heterogeneity, we present results on phenotypic heterogeneity by analyzing the variation in the functional activity of signal transduction pathways, using an earlier developed platform to measure such activity from mRNA measurements of pathways' direct target genes. Statistical analysis comparing macro-scale variation in pathway activity on up to five spatially distributed PT tissue blocks (n = 35), to micro-scale variation in activity on four adjacent samples of a single PT tissue block (n = 17), showed that macro-scale variation was not larger than micro-scale variation, except possibly for the PI3K pathway. Simulations using a "checkerboard clone-size" model showed that multiple small clones could explain the higher micro-scale variation in activity found for the TGFβ and Hedgehog pathways, and that intermediate/large clones could explain the possibly higher macro-scale variation of the PI3K pathway. While within PT, pathway activities presented a highly positive correlation, correlations weakened between PT and lymph node metastases (n = 9), becoming even worse for PT and distant metastases (n = 9), including a negative correlation for the ER pathway. While analysis of multiple sub-samples of a single biopsy may be sufficient to predict PT response to targeted therapies, metastatic breast cancer treatment prediction requires analysis of metastatic biopsies. Our findings on phenotypic intra-tumor heterogeneity are compatible with emerging ideas on a Big Bang type of cancer evolution in which macro-scale heterogeneity appears not dominant.

Hormone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Settings, and Therapeutic Implications

Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) accounts for approximately 75% of new BC diagnoses. Despite the undisputable progresses obtained in the treatment of HR+ BC in recent years, primary or acquired resistance to endocrine therapies still represents a clinically relevant issue, and is largely responsible for disease recurrence after curative surgery, as well as for disease progression in the metastatic setting. Among the mechanisms causing primary or acquired resistance to endocrine therapies is the loss of estrogen/progesterone receptor expression, which could make BC cells independent of estrogen stimulation and, consequently, resistant to estrogen deprivation or the pharmacological inhibition of estrogen receptors. This review aims at discussing the molecular mechanisms and the clinical implications of HR loss as a result of the therapies used in the neoadjuvant setting or for the treatment of advanced disease in HR+ BC patients.

Breast Cancer Heterogeneity and Response to Novel Therapeutics

Targeted cancer therapies against oncogenic drivers are actively being developed and tested in clinical trials. Targeting an oncogenic driver may only prove effective if the mutation is present in most tumoral cells. Therefore, highly heterogeneous tumors may be refractory to these therapies. This makes tumor heterogeneity a major challenge in cancer therapy. Although heterogeneity has traditionally been attributed to genetic diversity within cancer cell populations, it is now widely recognized that human cancers are heterogeneous in almost all distinguishable phenotypic characteristics. Understanding the genetic variability and also the non-genetic influences of tumor heterogeneity will provide novel insights into how to reverse therapeutic resistance and improve cancer therapy.

Intra-tumor molecular heterogeneity in breast cancer: definitions of measures and association with distant recurrence-free survival

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to define quantitative measures of intra-tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer based on histopathology data gathered from multiple samples on individual patients and determine their association with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS).

METHODS

We collected data from 971 invasive breast cancers, from 1st January 2000 to 23rd March 2014, that underwent repeat tumor sampling at our institution. We defined and calculated 31 measures of intra-tumor heterogeneity including ER, PR, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC), proliferation, EGFR IHC, grade, and histology. For each heterogeneity measure, Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether patients with heterogeneous disease had different distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) than those with homogeneous disease.

RESULTS

The presence of heterogeneity in ER percentage staining was prognostic of reduced DRFS with a hazard ratio of 4.26 (95% CI 2.22-8.18, p < 0.00002). It remained significant after controlling for the ER status itself (p < 0.00062) and for patients that had chemotherapy (p < 0.00032). Most of the heterogeneity measures did not show any association with DRFS despite the considerable sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-tumor heterogeneity of ER receptor status may be a predictor of patient DRFS. Histopathologic data from multiple tissue samples may offer a view of tumor heterogeneity and assess recurrence risk.

Tumor Pre-Analytics in Molecular Pathology: Impact on Protein Expression and Analysis

Purpose of Review

Precision medicine promises patient tailored, individualized diagnosis and treatment of diseases and relies on clinical specimen integrity and accuracy of companion diagnostic testing. Therefore, pre-analytics, which are defined as the collection, processing, and storage of clinical specimens, are critically important to enable optimal diagnostics, molecular profiling, and clinical decision-making around harvested specimens. This review article discusses the impact of tumor pre-analytics on molecular pathology focusing on biospecimen protein expression and analysis.

Recent Findings

Due to busy clinical schedules and workflows that have been established for many years and to lack of standardization and limited assessment tools to quantify variability in pre-analytical processing, the effects of pre-analytics on biospecimen integrity are often overlooked. Several studies have recently emphasized an emerging crisis in science and reproducibility of results.

Summary

Biomarker instability due to pre-analytical variables affects comprehensive analysis and molecular phenotyping of patients’ tissue. This problematic emphasizes the critical need for standardized protocols and technologies to be applied in the clinical and research setting.

Drug Sensitivity of Different Tumor Lesions from the Same Patient Evaluated by a Short-Term Assay

A short-term antimetabolic assay, which considers the interference with [3H]thymidine incorporation as an indicator of drug effect, has been used to comparatively assess the chemosensitivity of different tumor lesions from the same patient. The analysis was performed on primary tumors and their synchronous metastases from 67 patients with breast, ovarian, gastrointestinal and germ cell testicular tumors. A remarkable difference in sensitivity to cytostatic drugs was observed between the two lesions. In contrast, a strong association in chemosensitivity (81.7% agreement rate; p < 0.01) was observed between two synchronous metastases from 17 patients with breast, ovarian, germ cell testicular tumors or malignant melanoma. In addition, the predictive relevance of the antimetabolic assay on clinical response to chemotherapy was analyzed in relation to the type of tumor lesion tested in vitro in a retrospective correlative study on 57 patients with advanced ovarian and germ cell testicular tumors. The objective clinical response was significantly correlated to the in vitro sensitivity of metastases (83.7% agreement rate; p < 0.01), but not to that of the primary tumor.

Tumor Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and differs greatly among different patients (intertumor heterogeneity) and even within each individual tumor (intratumor heterogeneity). Clinical and morphologic intertumor heterogeneity is reflected by staging systems and histopathologic classification of breast cancer. Heterogeneity in the expression of established prognostic and predictive biomarkers, hormone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 oncoprotein is the basis for targeted treatment. Molecular classifications are indicators of genetic tumor heterogeneity, which is probed with multigene assays and can lead to improved stratification into low- and high-risk groups for personalized therapy. Intratumor heterogeneity occurs at the morphologic, genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels, creating diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms of tumor heterogeneity that are relevant to the development of treatment resistance is a major area of research. Despite the improved knowledge of the complex genetic and phenotypic features underpinning tumor heterogeneity, there has been only limited advancement in diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive strategies for breast cancer. The current guidelines for reporting of biomarkers aim to maximize patient eligibility for targeted therapy, but do not take into account intratumor heterogeneity. The molecular classification of breast cancer is not implemented in routine clinical practice. Additional studies and in-depth analysis are required to understand the clinical significance of rapidly accumulating data. This review highlights inter- and intratumor heterogeneity of breast carcinoma with special emphasis on pathologic findings, and provides insights into the clinical significance of molecular and cellular mechanisms of heterogeneity.

Oncolytic viruses: emerging options for the treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer among women and is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths, following lung cancer. Severe toxicity associated with a long-term use of BC chemo- and radiotherapy makes it essential to look for newer therapeutics. Additionally, molecular heterogeneity at both intratumoral and intertumoral levels among BC subtypes is known to result in a differential response to standard therapeutics. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have emerged as one of the most promising treatment options for BC. Many preclinical and clinical studies have shown that OVs are effective in treating BC, both as a single therapeutic agent and as a part of combination therapies. Combination therapies involving multimodal therapeutics including OVs are becoming popular as they allow to achieve the synergistic therapeutic effects, while minimizing the associated toxicities. Here, we review the OVs for BC therapy in preclinical studies and in clinical trials, both as a monotherapy and as part of a combination therapy. We also briefly discuss the potential therapeutic targets for BC, as these are likely to be critical for the development of new OVs.

A study of tumor heterogeneity in a case with breast cancer

Tumor heterogeneity has been suggested based on clinical and pathological findings. Several clinical findings can be explained by tumor evolution during progression and metastasis. We herein report a case of metastatic breast cancer indicated tumor heterogeneity by clinical findings and a genomic analysis. A 64-year-old woman with advanced breast cancer was treated with primary chemotherapy, to which primary tumor responded. After a 6 month treatment pause, lung, liver, and skin metastases developed and her serum tumor markers were elevated. None of those serum markers had been elevated before the treatment, despite the large tumor burden. Notably, there was discordance in the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) between the primary tumor and metastatic skin lesions, with the former being negative and the latter positive. A genomic analysis was performed by in-house Breast Cancer Panel, which consisted of 53 pre-selected genes. Twenty-three somatic mutations were found in primary breast tumor and 7 in the skin metastasis. None of these 30 genes matched. However, the cell-free (cf) DNA in the plasma taken at the time of skin metastasis contained 10 mutations, 7 from the primary lesion and 3 from the metastasis. These data indicate that the clonal changes or tumor heterogeneity was shown in two solid tumors by clinical and the result of a genomic analysis. Of particular interest was that cell-free DNA could be a powerful tool to look into these dynamic changes.

Kazinol-E is a specific inhibitor of ERK that suppresses the enrichment of a breast cancer stem-like cell population

Growing evidence shows that cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) contribute to breast cancer recurrence and to its resistance to conventional therapies. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway is a major determinant in the control of diverse cellular processes, including the maintenance of CSLCs. In this study, we found that Kazinol-E, an antioxidant flavan from Broussonetia kazinoki, decreased the CSLC population of a breast cancer cell line, MCF7. The CSLC population, characterized by CD44 high/CD24 low expression or by high Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 activity, was decreased by a concentration of Kazinol-E that did not affect the growth of bulk-cultured MCF7 cells. Kazinol-E did not decrease EGF-induced ERK phosphorylation in CSLCs, but did block the phosphorylation of an ERK substrate, p90RSK2, at Thr359/Ser363. We further demonstrated that EGF-induced ERK activity was blocked by Kazinol-E in a wild-type K-Ras-expressing non-small cell lung cancer cell line H226B. An in vitro kinase assay with purified ERK1 and p90RSK2 as its substrate demonstrated a direct inhibition of ERK activity by Kazinol E. Additionally, a the molecular docking study provided putative binding modes of Kazinol-E into the ATP binding pocket of ERK1 Collectively, these results suggest that Kazinol-E is a direct inhibitor of ERK1, and more studies are warranted to develop this reagent for therapeutic breast CSLC targeting.

Molecular Heterogeneity in Primary Breast Carcinomas and Axillary Lymph Node Metastases Assessed by Genomic Fingerprinting Analysis

Molecular heterogeneity within primary breast carcinomas and among axillary lymph node (LN) metastases may impact diagnosis and confound treatment. In this study, we used short tandem repeated sequences to assess genomic heterogeneity and to determine hereditary relationships among primary tumor areas and regional metastases from 30 breast cancer patients. We found that primary carcinomas were genetically heterogeneous and sampling multiple areas was necessary to adequately assess genomic variability. LN metastases appeared to originate at different time periods during disease progression from different sites of the primary tumor and the extent of genomic divergence among regional metastases was associated with a less favorable patient outcome (P = 0.009). In conclusion, metastasis is a complex process influenced by primary tumor heterogeneity and variability in the timing of dissemination. Genomic variation in primary breast tumors and regional metastases may negatively impact clinical diagnostics and contribute to therapeutic resistance.

Preanalytical variables and phosphoepitope expression in FFPE tissue: quantitative epitope assessment after variable cold ischemic time

Individualized targeted therapies for cancer patients require accurate and reproducible assessment of biomarkers to be able to plan treatment accordingly. Recent studies have shown highly variable effects of preanalytical variables on gene expression profiling and protein levels of different tissue types. Several publications have described protein degradation of tissue samples as a direct result of delay of formalin fixation of the tissue. Phosphorylated proteins are more labile and epitope degradation can happen within 30 min of cold ischemic time. To address this issue, we evaluated the change in antigenicity of a series of phosphoproteins in paraffin-embedded samples from breast tumors as a function of time to formalin fixation. A tissue microarray consisting of 93 breast cancer specimens with documented time-to-fixation was used to evaluate changes in antigenicity of 12 phosphoepitopes frequently used in research settings as a function of cold ischemic time. Analysis was performed in a quantitative manner using the AQUA technology for quantitative immunofluorescence. For each marker, least squares univariate linear regression was performed and confidence intervals were computed using bootstrapping. The majority of the epitopes tested revealed changes in expression levels with increasing time to formalin fixation. Some phosphorylated proteins, such as phospho-HSP27 and phospho-S6 RP, involved in post-translational modification and stress response pathways increased in expression or phosphorylation levels. Others (like phospho-AKT, phosphor-ERK1/2, phospho-Tyrosine, phospho-MET, and others) are quite labile and loss of antigenicity can be reported within 1-2 h of cold ischemic time. Therefore specimen collection should be closely monitored and subjected to quality control measures to ensure accurate measurement of these epitopes. However, a few phosphoepitopes (like phospho-JAK2 and phospho-ER) are sufficiently robust for routine usage in companion diagnostic testing.

Molecular signatures of lymph node status by intrinsic subtype: gene expression analysis of primary breast tumors from patients with and without metastatic lymph nodes

Background

Identification of a gene expression signature in primary breast tumors that could classify patients by lymph node status would allow patients to avoid the morbidities of surgical disruption of the lymph nodes. Attempts to identify such a signature have, to date, been unsuccessful. Because breast tumor subtypes have unique molecular characteristics and different sites of metastasis, molecular signatures for lymph node involvement may vary by subtype.

Methods

Gene expression data was generated from HG U133A 2.0 arrays for 135 node positive and 210 node negative primary breast tumors. Intrinsic subtype was assigned using the BreastPRS. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA using lymph node status as the variable with a False-discovery rate <0.05, to define significance.

Results

Luminal A tumors were most common (51%) followed by basal-like (27%), HER2-enriched (14%) luminal B (7%) and normal-like (1%). Basal-like and luminal A tumors were less likely to have metastatic lymph nodes (35% and 37%, respectively) compared to luminal B or HER2-enriched (52% and 51%, respectively). No differentially expressed genes associated with lymph node status were detected when all tumors were considered together or within each subtype.

Conclusions

Gene expression patterns from the primary tumor are not able to stratify patients by lymph node status. Although the primary breast tumor may influence tumor cell dissemination, once metastatic cells enter the lymphatics, it is likely that characteristics of the lymph node microenvironment, such as establishment of a pre-metastatic niche and release of pro-survival factors, determine which cells are able to colonize. The inability to utilize molecular profiles from the primary tumor to determine lymph node status suggest that other avenues of investigation, such as how systemic factors including diminished immune response or genetic susceptibility contribute to metastasis, may be critical in the development of tools for non-surgical assessment of lymph node status with a corresponding reduction in downstream sequelae associated with disruption of the lymphatics.

Personalized adjuvant therapies: lessons from the past: the opening address by the St. Gallen 2013 award recipient

For several decades, personalized adjuvant therapies have been prescribed based on features that predict response to specific types of treatment. In this summary four specific issues regarding adjuvant therapies are described. Each one developed using information from past experience and is ready to be challenged by future findings from clinical trials and maturation of follow-up data. 1) Accuracy of determination of steroid hormone receptors and of HER2-status was the key feature in International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) and Breast International Group (BIG) trials. 2) Investigations on ovarian function suppression in IBCSG clinical trials led to the design of two trials (SOFT and TEXT), which are likely to lead to improved adjuvant therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer. 3) Data from the BIG 1-98 trial of letrozole vs tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer provided information on which patients might obtain increased benefit from aromatase inhibitors and which might achieve similar treatment outcome with tamoxifen alone. 4) Finally, low-dose, frequently administered cytotoxics (metronomic chemotherapy) were tested in advanced disease with surprisingly favorable disease control and very low incidence of side effects. Personalized treatments are likely to improve substantially with increasingly accurate determination of their targets and by using risk- and toxicity-modulated therapies.

Association of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 following neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyze the association between the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) in breast cancer with neoadjuvant therapy by using tissue biopsy and surgical specimens.

METHODS

This study included 78 patients with breast cancer, who presented to our hospital between June 1999 and June 2011, and were treated with neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent mastectomy or partial mastectomy. All clinicopathological data regarding pre-neoadjuvant biopsy and definitive surgical specimens were reviewed for accuracy. The status of ER, PR, and HER2 was determined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Paired samples from 78 women (mean age 51.4 ± 11.7 years) were successfully analyzed. A switch in the status of ER was identified in 16 patients (20 %); PR, in 18 (23 %); and HER2, in 27 (35 %). There were no significant differences in the status of ER, PR, and HER2 between the primary tumor and the resected tumor after neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy does not significantly influence the status of the steroid hormone receptors and the HER2 level in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial biopsy may be reliable for determining the appropriate adjuvant therapy, but final pathology are still needed to evaluate the prognosis and provided the alternative treatment when tumor recurrence. Further prospective study is needed to optimize the care available for breast cancer patients.

Quantitative assessment of effect of preanalytic cold ischemic time on protein expression in breast cancer tissues

BACKGROUND

Companion diagnostic tests can depend on accurate measurement of protein expression in tissues. Preanalytic variables, especially cold ischemic time (time from tissue removal to fixation in formalin) can affect the measurement and may cause false-negative results. We examined 23 proteins, including four commonly used breast cancer biomarker proteins, to quantify their sensitivity to cold ischemia in breast cancer tissues.

METHODS

A series of 93 breast cancer specimens with known time-to-fixation represented in a tissue microarray and a second series of 25 matched pairs of core needle biopsies and breast cancer resections were used to evaluate changes in antigenicity as a function of cold ischemic time. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2 or Ki67, and 19 other antigens were tested. Each antigen was measured using the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence on at least one series. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

We found no evidence for loss of antigenicity with time-to-fixation for ER, PgR, HER2, or Ki67 in a 4-hour time window. However, with a bootstrapping analysis, we observed a trend toward loss for ER and PgR, a statistically significant loss of antigenicity for phosphorylated tyrosine (P = .0048), and trends toward loss for other proteins. There was evidence of increased antigenicity in acetylated lysine, AKAP13 (P = .009), and HIF1A (P = .046), which are proteins known to be expressed in conditions of hypoxia. The loss of antigenicity for phosphorylated tyrosine and increase in expression of AKAP13, and HIF1A were confirmed in the biopsy/resection series.

CONCLUSIONS

Key breast cancer biomarkers show no evidence of loss of antigenicity, although this dataset assesses the relatively short time beyond the 1-hour limit in recent guidelines. Other proteins show changes in antigenicity in both directions. Future studies that extend the time range and normalize for heterogeneity will provide more comprehensive information on preanalytic variation due to cold ischemic time.

DNA methylation of polycomb group target genes in cores taken from breast cancer centre and periphery

We previously demonstrated that methylation of neugogenic differentiation 1 (NEUROD1) gene, a polycomb group target (PCGT) gene is a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Here, we address the question whether NEUROD1 methylation provides clinical information independent from its expression level, and whether PCGT methylation is homogeneous in breast cancer. We examined: (1) NEUROD1 methylation and mRNA expression in 9 breast cancer cell lines and 63 tumour specimens, (2) DNA methylation in a training set of 55 PCGT genes taken from the centre (TUC) and periphery (TUP) of 15 breast cancer specimens, and compared this with 22 non neoplastic controls, and finally, (3) validated statistically significant genes in an independent set of 20 cases versus 18 controls. 8/9 cell lines demonstrated NEUROD1 methylation, whereas, there was only one cell-line that showed NEUROD1 expression. There was no association between methylation and expression in breast tumour specimens, with only 14% exhibiting NEUROD1 expression. Of the 55 PCGT genes analysed, 24% (13/55) were shown to be cancer specific (p < 0.05) with a receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) area-under-the-curve (AUC) of >0.7 (range 0.71-0.95). DNA methylation accurately predicted the presence of cancer in both TUC and TUP. DNA methylation of PCGT genes predicts the presence of breast cancer and is not subject to tumour heterogeneity. Further work will reveal if methylation of PCGT genes will serve as a robust means for the clinical detection and assessment of breast cancer.

Changes in and prognostic value of hormone receptor status in a series of operable breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to detect and analyze changes in hormone receptor (HR) status after treatment of operable breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Patients were treated from 1982 to 2004 with different NCT combinations, mainly in successive prospective phase II trials. HR status before and after NCT was retested and reviewed in a blinded fashion by two pathologists, for 420 patients from a database of 710 patients. Among these 420 tumors, 145 (35%) were HR negative and 275 (65%) were HR positive before NCT. The HR status had changed after treatment in 98 patients (23%): 61 patients (42%) initially HR negative became HR positive. This HR-positive switch was significantly correlated with better overall survival (OS), compared with patients with unchanged HR-negative tumors. Moreover, this HR-positive switch also had an effect on disease-free survival (DFS). Conversely, 37 patients (13%) initially HR positive became HR negative after NCT. However, this group of previously positive patients still had a survival advantage for OS, but not for DFS. The Allred score was evaluated before and after chemotherapy. An increase in Allred score after NCT was significantly correlated with better DFS but not OS. It was previously shown, for other tumor parameters, that residual disease after NCT, rather than parameters evaluated on the initial biopsy, must be considered for patient prognosis. In this work, NCT induced variations in HR status in 23% of patients. A positive switch in HR status after NCT could be an indicator of better prognosis for patient outcome.

Quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor heterogeneity in breast cancer

Immunohistochemical analyses (IHC) of biomarkers are extensively used for tumor characterization and as prognostic and predictive measures. The current standard of single slide analysis assumes that one 5 microM section is representative of the entire tumor. We used our automated image analysis technology (AQUA) using a modified IHC technique with fluorophores to compare estrogen receptor (ER) expression in multiple blocks/slides from cases of primary breast cancer with the objective of quantifying tumor heterogeneity within sections and between blocks. To normalize our ER scores and allow slide-to-slide comparisons, 0.6 microm histospots of representative breast cancer cases with known ER scores were assembled into a 'gold standard array' (GSA) and placed adjacently to each whole section. Overall, there was excellent correlation between AQUA scores and the pathologist's scores and reproducibility of GSA scores (mean linear regression R value 0.8903). Twenty-nine slides from 11 surgical cases were then analyzed totaling over 2000 AQUA images. Using standard binary assignments of AQUA (>10) and pathologist's (>10%) scores as being positive, there was fair concordancy between AQUA and pathologist scores (73%) and between slides from different blocks from the same cases (75%). However using continuous AQUA scores, agreement between AQUA and pathologist was far lower and between slides from different blocks from the same cases only 19%. Within individual slides there was also significant heterogeneity in a scattered pattern, most notably for slides with the highest AQUA scores. In sum, using a quantitative measure of ER expression, significant block-to-block heterogeneity was found in 81% of cases. These results most likely reflect both laboratory-based variability due to lack of standardization of immunohistochemistry and true biological heterogeneity. It is also likely to be dependent on the biomarker analyzed and suggests further studies should be carried out to determine how these findings may affect clinical decision-making processes.

Re-evaluating adjuvant breast cancer trials: assessing hormone receptor status by immunohistochemical versus extraction assays

BACKGROUND

Tumor levels of steroid hormone receptors, a factor used to select adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer, are currently determined with immunohistochemical assays. These assays have a discordance of 10%-30% with previously used extraction assays. We assessed the concordance and predictive value of hormone receptor status as determined by immunohistochemical and extraction assays on specimens from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VIII and IX. These trials predominantly used extraction assays and compared adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy with endocrine therapy alone among pre- and postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer. Trial conclusions were that combination therapy provided a benefit to pre- and postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors but not to ER-positive postmenopausal patients. ER-positive premenopausal patients required further study.

METHODS

Tumor specimens from 571 premenopausal and 976 postmenopausal patients on which extraction assays had determined ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) levels before randomization from October 1, 1988, through October 1, 1999, were re-evaluated with an immunohistochemical assay in a central pathology laboratory. The endpoint was disease-free survival. Hazard ratios of recurrence or death for treatment comparisons were estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression models, and discriminatory ability was evaluated with the c index. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Concordance of hormone receptor status determined by both assays ranged from 74% (kappa = 0.48) for PgR among postmenopausal patients to 88% (kappa = 0.66) for ER in postmenopausal patients. Hazard ratio estimates were similar for the association between disease-free survival and ER status (among all patients) or PgR status (among postmenopausal patients) as determined by the two methods. However, among premenopausal patients treated with endocrine therapy alone, the discriminatory ability of PgR status as determined by immunohistochemical assay was statistically significantly better (c index = 0.60 versus 0.51; P = .003) than that determined by extraction assay, and so immunohistochemically determined PgR status could predict disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial conclusions in which ER status (for all patients) or PgR status (for postmenopausal patients) was determined by immunohistochemical assay supported those determined by extraction assays. However, among premenopausal patients, trial conclusions drawn from PgR status differed--immunohistochemically determined PgR status could predict response to endocrine therapy, unlike that determined by the extraction assay.

Metastatic breast cancer: an updating

This article reports on recent advances on metastatic breast cancer. Detection, prognostic factors, predictors of response to therapy and therapy, with particular regard to targeted therapies, were examined.

DETECTION

Unlike current guidelines that yet do not routinely recommend intensive clinical-instrumental post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients, relatively large data collected in the last decades have shown that an intensive post-operative follow-up with 'dynamic evaluation' of a suitable tumour marker panel precedes a few months as average the clinical and/or instrumental sign of a pending relapse in most relapsed patients and largely limits the use of the common instrumental examinations.

PROGNOSIS AND THERAPY PREDICTORS

Disease-free interval (DFI)<or=24 months, adjuvant chemotherapy, liver and distant soft tissue involvement or DFI>24 months and disease confined to bony skeleton are prognostic factors more often correlated with relatively poor or prolonged survival, respectively. Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in primary tumour and at the relapse correlates strongly with response to salvage hormone therapy and data from large trials showed that 38-59% of ER and/or PR+ post-menopausal patients had clinical benefit from first line tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. An inverse correlation of ER with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been found. The co-expression of HER-2/neu and/or elevated serum HER-2/neu protein level were associated with a low rate and shorter duration of response of ER+ patients to first line hormone therapy. Accordingly, ER-EGFR- compared with ER-EGFR+ tumours are usually more responsive to endocrine therapy. High class III beta-tubulin expression or fall in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) from baseline levels have been found to significantly predict resistance to chemotherapeutic agents.

THERAPY

Liposomes as carrier of doxorubicin (Caelix, Evacet, Myocet) is one approach to decrease the anthracycline-related cardiac toxicity. Weekly paclitaxel or docetaxel and oral formulation of vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (capecitabine) provide new effective and well tolerated options that reach greater dose intensity and cumulative dose than with the conventional schedules. As to the so called 'tailored' or targeted therapies, the more potent and highly selective third generation of aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane) targeting ER+ tumours by estrogen deprivation, challenge tamoxifen as current standard first line therapy in postmenopausals. One pilot study showed that stimulation of cellular immunity by the addition of beta-interferon-interleukin-2 sequence in patients on clinical benefit on first line tamoxifen significantly prolonged median overall survival (OS) and duration of response compared to that observed in similar patients only treated with tamoxifen. Trastuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to extracellular domain of HER-2, plus conventional chemotherapy has become a standard of care for women with overexpressing HER-2 tumours. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that in refractory metastatic breast cancer doubled the response rate of capecitabine although it did not affect survival. Finally, the so called 'oligometastatic' and a few stage IV diseases are conditions amenable to be rendered with no evidence of disease (NED) after local surgery and/or radiation. In both, as well as in complete responders to chemotherapy, minimal residual disease (m.r.d.) likely continues to be present. Recent data suggest that 'biological' therapy (immunomodulators and/or retinoids with or without hormone therapy), might be suitable to be successfully tested in these patients as maintenance treatment given soon after local intervention or chemotherapy.

Tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal women with lymph node-positive breast cancer: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 13-93

PURPOSE

The value of adjuvant tamoxifen after chemotherapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer has not been adequately assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 1999, International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 13-93 enrolled 1,246 assessable premenopausal women with axillary node-positive, operable breast cancer. All patients received chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide plus either doxorubicin or epirubicin for four courses followed by immediate or delayed classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil for three courses), which was followed by either tamoxifen (20 mg daily) for 5 years or no further treatment. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Tumors were classified as estrogen receptor (ER) -positive (n = 735, 59%) if immunohistochemical (IHC) or ligand-binding assays (LBA) were clearly positive. The ER-negative group included all other tumors (n = 511, 41%). A subset of the ER-negative group was defined as ER absent (n = 108, 9%) if IHC staining was none or if the LBA result was 0 fmol/mg cytosol protein. The median follow-up time was 7 years.

RESULTS

Tamoxifen improved DFS in the ER-positive cohort (hazard ratio [HR] for tamoxifen v no tamoxifen = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.75; P < .0001) but not in the ER-negative cohort (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.35; P = .89). Tamoxifen had a detrimental effect on patients with ER-absent tumors compared with no tamoxifen in an unplanned exploratory analysis (HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.03 to 4.29; P = .04). Patients with ER-positive tumors who achieved chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea had a significantly improved outcome (HR for amenorrhea v no amenorrhea = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86; P = .004), whether or not they received tamoxifen.

CONCLUSION

Tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved treatment outcome in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive disease, but its use as adjuvant therapy for patients with ER-negative tumors is not recommended.

Impact of metastatic estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status on survival

Hormone responsive breast cancer is usually determined by the presence of estrogen receptors (ER) or progesterone receptors (PR) on primary invasive breast cancers. Adjuvant and metastatic hormone therapy are recommended based on primary ER and PR determination. Little information is available to determine if primary hormone receptors correlate with metastatic disease and if survival is influenced by metastatic receptor status. We retrospectively compared primary to metastatic tumor ER and PR content from 200 metastatic breast cancer patients. ER and PR analyses were available in both primary and metastatic disease in 200 and 173 patients, respectively. There was a correlation between both the ER and PR in the primary and metastatic lesion (p < 0.001). However, in 60 of 200 (30%) patients, discordance between primary and metastatic ER was noted. Tumors from 68 of 173 (39.3%) showed discordance for PR. In 39 (19.5%) patients, the ER primary status was positive and metastatic status was negative and in 21 (10.5%) patients, the primary status was negative and metastatic status was positive. Survival from the time of metastatic diagnosis was calculated. Those patients with ER positive primary and metastatic tumors (Positive/Positive) or only the metastatic lesion (Negative/Positive) had similar median survival (1131 and 1111 days, respectively). However, patients with tumors that changed from positive primary to negative metastasis (Positive/Negative) experienced significantly shorter median survival (669 days, p < 0.05). Likewise, median survival (580 days) was significantly shorter for patients with primary and metastasis ER negative (Negative/Negative, p < 0.001) compared to Positive/Positive (p < 0.001) or compared to Negative/Positive (p < 0.02). The changes in PR status were not associated with a change in survival. We found a significant discordance between hormone receptor content of primary versus metastatic breast cancer. The ER status of the metastatic lesion was a better predictor of survival. Therefore, optimal metastatic treatment cannot be determined solely on primary ER and PR analysis.

Toremifene and tamoxifen are equally effective for early-stage breast cancer: first results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials 12-93 and 14-93

BACKGROUND

Toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of tamoxifen, developed to improve its risk-benefit profile. The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) conducted two complementary randomized trials for peri- and postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer to compare toremifene versus tamoxifen as the endocrine agent and simultaneously investigate a chemotherapy-oriented question. This is the first report of the endocrine comparison after a median follow-up of 5.5 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1035 patients were available for analysis: 75% had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary tumors, the median number of involved axillary lymph nodes was three and 81% received prior adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Toremifene and tamoxifen yielded similar disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS): 5-year DFS rates of 72% and 69%, respectively [risk ratio (RR)=0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.76-1.18]; 5-year OS rates of 85% and 81%, respectively (RR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.78-1.36). Similar outcomes were observed in the ER-positive cohort. Toxicities were similar in the two treatment groups with very few women (<1%) experiencing severe thromboembolic or cerebrovascular complications. Quality of life results were also similar. Nine patients developed early stage endometrial cancer (toremifene, six; tamoxifen, three).

CONCLUSIONS

Toremifene is a valid and safe alternative to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Goserelin Versus Either Modality Alone for Premenopausal Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Although chemotherapy and ovarian function suppression are both effective adjuvant therapies for patients with early-stage breast cancer, little is known of the efficacy of their sequential combination. In an International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) randomized clinical trial (Trial VIII) for pre- and perimenopausal women with lymph node-negative breast cancer, we compared sequential chemotherapy followed by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist goserelin with each modality alone.

METHODS

From March 1990 through October 1999, 1063 patients stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status and radiotherapy plan were randomly assigned to receive goserelin for 24 months (n = 346), six courses of "classical" CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy (n = 360), or six courses of classical CMF followed by 18 months of goserelin (CMF --> goserelin; n = 357). A fourth arm (no adjuvant treatment) with 46 patients was discontinued in 1992. Tumors were classified as ER-negative (30%), ER-positive (68%), or ER status unknown (3%). Twenty percent of patients were aged 39 years or younger. The median follow-up was 7 years. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Patients with ER-negative tumors achieved better disease-free survival if they received CMF (5-year DFS for CMF = 84%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77% to 91%; 5-year DFS for CMF --> goserelin = 88%, 95% CI = 82% to 94%) than if they received goserelin alone (5-year DFS = 73%, 95% CI = 64% to 81%). By contrast, for patients with ER-positive disease, chemotherapy alone and goserelin alone provided similar outcomes (5-year DFS for both treatment groups = 81%, 95% CI = 76% to 87%), whereas sequential therapy (5-year DFS = 86%, 95% CI = 82% to 91%) provided a statistically nonsignificant improvement compared with either modality alone, primarily because of the results among younger women.

CONCLUSIONS

Premenopausal women with ER-negative (i.e., endocrine nonresponsive), lymph node-negative breast cancer should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with ER-positive (i.e., endocrine responsive) disease, the combination of chemotherapy with ovarian function suppression or other endocrine agents, and the use of endocrine therapy alone should be studied.

Comparison of core oestrogen receptor (ER) assay with excised tumour: intratumoral distribution of ER in breast carcinoma

AIMS

The use of the H score (involving the assessment of intensity and distribution of positivity) on sections stained for the oestrogen receptor (ER) by immunocytochemistry (ICC) allows different samples to be compared and detailed correlations to be made between hormone receptor expression and morphology. This study assessed the reliability of core biopsy in predicting ER expression in the same tumour excised later at treatment. The distribution of ER within excised tumours was investigated.

METHODS

The distribution of ER positivity was investigated in 51 diagnostic core biopsies and across the diameter of 51 subsequently excised tumours in a field by field (magnification, x40; field diameter, 0.4 mm) assessment using the semiquantitive H scoring system.

RESULTS

The ER H score in diagnostic core biopsy was significantly higher (p = 0.05, paired rank test; overall mean, 130; n = 51) than the mean in the corresponding excised tumour (mean, 110; n = 51). There was a significant downward trend in ER positivity from the periphery of tumours towards the centre (p = 0.001). The reduction of ER positivity was 6 H score units (2%)/mm. If core biopsies were orientated with the tumour edge at one end no change in ER positivity with field number along the length of the core could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

ER estimation in core biopsies correlated well with expression in tumours but ER expression was higher in the core biopsies than in the excised tumours. ER expression was higher at the periphery of tumours than at the centre. The higher ER expression in cores may reflect the higher chance of sampling the peripheral part of a tumour using a needle core.

Tubular carcinoma of the breast: prognosis and response to adjuvant systemic therapy

BACKGROUND

Tubular carcinoma of the breast is an uncommon and usually small tumour, and is thought to have a favourable prognosis. The present study examined the long-term prognosis of patients with tubular breast carcinoma and the roles of axillary dissection and adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Eighty-six tubular cases were identified from a large worldwide database of 9520 breast carcinoma patients entered into randomized adjuvant therapy trials run by the International Breast Cancer Study Group from 1978 to 1999. These patients were followed for a median of 12 years.

RESULTS

Forty-two (49%) cases were node-positive, of which 33 (79%) had 1-3 nodes involved. Ten (32%) of the 31 smaller tumours (< or = 1 cm in size) were node-positive. Patients with node-positive tubular carcinoma had a significantly better 10-year relapse-free survival (P = 0.006) and survival (P < 0.0001) compared with non-tubular node-positive cases. Overall survival was similar for node-positive and node-negative tubular carcinoma. Overall, 71 patients (83%) received some form of adjuvant systemic therapy. Of the 86 cases, 43 (50%) received more than one course of chemotherapy. There was an 85% decrease in the risk of death for patients who received more than one course of chemotherapy compared to those who did not (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.82; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to other histological types of breast cancer, tubular carcinoma has a better long-term prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy may further improve prognosis and involvement of axillary nodes may not be an indicator for early death due to breast carcinoma.

Oestrogen receptor: a stable phenotype in breast cancer

Oestrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer is regarded as a phenotype that may change during the natural history of the disease or during endocrine therapy. It has been suggested that in up to 70% of tumours that show acquired resistance the mechanism may be changed in ER status from positive to negative. This paper proposes an alternative hypothesis that ER expression in a stable phenotype in breast cancer. The paper reviews the literature on ER expression during the natural history of breast cancer in patients and also presents data on the effect of endocrine therapy on ER expression. If the alternative hypothesis is true it has important implications for treatment from chemoprevention to acquired endocrine resistance in advanced disease. Equally, if the hypothesis is true, attempts to develop laboratory models of endocrine resistance where ER-positive tumours become ER negative need to be re-evaluated.

Immunohistochemical study of estrogen receptors in primary breast carcinomas and their lymph node metastases including comparison of two monoclonal antibodies

Estrogen receptors (ER) status was investigated in 101 primary breast carcinomas and their axillary lymph node metastases to determine if the malignant cells retained or changed this phenotypic feature during the metastatic process. Immunohistochemistry with the ER-ICA kit (Abbott Laboratory) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was used (paraffin ER-ICA). The ER status in primary and secondary tumours was concordant in 80 patients (79%) and discordant in 21 (21%). Eighteen of these twenty-one patients had ER-positive primary tumours and ER-negative lymph node metastases. This discordance, which may be due to loss of ERs in the metastatic cells or tumour heterogeneity, could explain the well-known failure of endocrine treatment in some of the patients with ER-positive primary tumours. A new monoclonal antibody ID5 (DAKO) against ERs was applied on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 83 of these 101 primary carcinomas. These analyses and paraffin ER-ICA analyses were compared to prior analyses of the same 83 tumours using the ER-ICA kit on fresh frozen tissue ("gold standard", frozen ER-ICA). Kappa coefficient, sensitivity and specificity were 0.74, 0.96 and 0.75 for ID5 antibody, and 0.59, 0.72 and 0.96 for ER-ICA antibody on paraffin sections.

Sequential estrogen receptor determinations from primary breast cancer and at relapse: prognostic and therapeutic relevance. The International Breast Cancer Study Group (formerly Ludwig Group)

We retrospectively evaluated 401 selected patients who had estrogen receptor (ER) assays both at primary surgery and at relapse in an accessible site to determine the clinical relevance of the subsequent ER determination. The median time between ER assessments was 27 months (range: 2-122 months). The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 6 years (range: 2-12 years). For patients with ER+ tumors at primary diagnosis, 29% (76/261) had ER- tumors at relapse, while for ER- primaries, the conversion rate was 33% (46/140). Conversions from ER+ to ER- occurred more often when the time interval between assays was less than one year (p = 0.004), while conversions from ER- to ER+ tended to occur late (beyond three years; p = 0.0003). Treatments received between assays (usually adjuvant therapy) had only a slight influence on ER status conversion. Post-relapse survival was poor for patients who had the biopsy accessible recurrence within one year; an expression of the aggressive nature of the disease. Among patients whose accessible relapse was beyond one year, those with ER- primaries who converted to ER+ had a longer survival than those whose recurrence was classified again as ER- (p = 0.006). This group of patients with ER- primaries who recurred beyond one year with an ER+ tumor in an accessible site represented 29% (40/140) of all patients with ER- primaries and had an estimated overall survival rate of more than 60% at 6 years from the accessible relapse. ER determination upon relapse within one year has very little clinical relevance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Regional heterogeneity in breast carcinoma: thymidine labelling index, steroid hormone receptors, DNA ploidy

We examined multiple samples of 65 primary breast carcinomas larger than 1 cm in diameter for thymidine labelling index (TLI), DNA index (DNAI, a measure of cellular DNA content by flow cytometry), and estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors by radioligand-binding. One or more axillary metastases were also assayed in 11 patients. Two to 15 samples were successfully assayed for TLI from 59 tumors, 2-31 samples for DNAI from 61 tumors, and 2-15 samples from 55 tumors for ER and PgR. Criteria for heterogeneity were excess inter-sample variance in comparison with intrasample variance at the p less than 0.05 level for TLI and DNAI, and variation of clinically significant magnitude in assay results for ER and PgR. Sixty-one percent of tumors were heterogeneous for TLI, 26% for DNAI, 24% for ER and 40% for PgR. High TLI disposed toward heterogeneity for TLI itself (p = 0.06), for ER (p = 0.04), and for PgR (p = 0.007). Young age favored heterogeneity for TLI (p = 0.12), ER (p = 0.002), and PgR (p = 0.04). Heterogeneity for DNAI was not related to age and TLI status but was more common in larger tumors (p = 0.08). After consideration of relationships between TLI, age, size, ER and PgR, TLI rather than age appears to be the more important determinant of heterogeneity for receptors. High TLI could lead to heterogeneity through increased numbers of cell divisions that favor emergence of variant stemlines, or by causing local vascular and humoral disparities through rapid growth. Regional heterogeneity can explain erroneous prognostic predictions in approximately 10% to 20% of breast carcinoma patients. We recommend multiple sampling of large breast carcinomas and analysis of axillary metastases for study of tumor markers.

Discordant results between radioligand and immunohistochemical assays for steroid receptors in breast carcinoma

Surgical biopsy specimens of 179 breast carcinoma were studied by steroid-binding and immunohistochemical assays or oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR) in order to explore reasons for discordant results between the two assay types. Receptor statuses in 18% of ER assays and 30% of PR assays were in disagreement. Immunohistochemistry-positive steroid-binding-negative status predominated among the discordant ER assays, while the discordant PR assays displayed the opposite situation. In discordant assays receptor concentration was significantly more often close to the cut-off (10-50 fmol mg-1) than in the concordant ones. Low binding affinity (high Kd) was also significantly associated with disagreeing assay results. These observations clearly indicate that immunohistochemical ER and PR assays measure high-affinity binding components (i.e. type I receptors) in steroid-binding assays. ER but not PR assays in premenopausal women disagreed more often than those in post-menopausal women. Such factors as histological type, specimen size in steroid-binding assay, grade of malignancy and tumour necrosis were statistically unrelated to agreement or disagreement of receptor assays.

Correlation of an Estrogen Receptor-related Phosphoprotein with Histopathological Features in Breast Cancer

A series of 65 cases of different histological types of breast carcinoma was investigated for the immunohistochemical location of the estrogen receptor-related, 29 kD phosphoprotein using the ER-D5 monoclonal antibody.

The ER-D5 response is heterogeneous in relation to some therapeutic limitations and is correlated with histopathological features of the tumors and survival. The main parameters for evaluation of breast cancers are reviewed, both those that are statistically correlated and those that are not apparently always correlated but are known to have considerable biological meaning, such as the ER-status of tumors.

Estrogen receptor distribution in the peripheral, intermediate and central regions of breast cancers

The central, intermediate and peripheral regions of 25 breast tumors were analyzed for estrogen receptors (ER) using a combined biochemical (BC)/immunohistochemical (IHC) micromethod. To optimize the regional comparison, the percentage carcinoma per sample (PCS) was evaluated and incorporated into the quantification of the ER. Correction of the measured ER for the PCS eliminated differences in receptor levels between the central and peripheral regions but not the intermediate region. Although the corrected BC-ER level in this region was found to be about 20% higher, the IHC method did not detect such a difference. Determination of the ER status at the actual growth front of a tumor, rather than in the intermediate region where ER levels appear to be highest, may be of greater clinical relevance. Intra-regional ER heterogeneity appears, however, to be particularly pronounced in this area of a tumor.

Quantification of oestrogen receptors in breast cancer: radiochemical assay on cytosols and cryostat sections compared with semiquantitative immunocytochemical analysis

A radiochemical oestrogen receptor assay on cytosol was correlated with a radiochemical and an immunohistochemical oestrogen receptor assay using cryostat sections from 50 breast cancer specimens. Oestrogen receptors were reliably quantitated in 6 micron cryostat sections with Scatchard analysis using radiolabelled oestradiol, and a good quantitative and qualitative relation with cytosol oestrogen receptor assay was found. Parallel sections were used for routine histological tissue verification and for direct comparison with immunohistochemistry for oestrogen receptor. Specific immunoperoxidase staining with a rat monoclonal antibody was scored by semiquantitative evaluation of the staining intensity of cancer cell nuclei. Oestrogen receptor scoring was highly reproducible when performed by the same observer. The semiquantitative immunohistochemical oestrogen receptor score correlated significantly better with the radiochemical assay on sections than with cytosol assay. Oestrogen receptor in breast cancer can be reliably assayed by semiquantitative evaluation of cryostat sections immunostained for oestrogen receptor, but only if the procedure is adequately standardised. The results underline the importance of cellular heterogeneity as a cause of variation in oestrogen receptor assay evaluation in breast cancer.

Estrogen control of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme-5 in human breast cancer

Determinations of estradiol receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), total lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH) and electrophoretic separation of LDH isoenzymes were performed in cytosols from 118 samples of primary infiltrating ductal mammary carcinoma. ER + PR+ tumors demonstrated a significant increase in the proportion of the LDH muscle-type isoenzyme (LDH5) as compared to ER-PR- samples (p less than 0.002). Tumors lacking one of the receptors presented intermediate LDH5 percentages. As total LDH activity bore no relation to either the presence or absence of receptors, the increased proportion represents an absolute elevation of LDH5, suggesting that LDH5 may be a promising hormone-dependence marker. As an in vitro model to study whether LDH5 was induced by estradiol via ER, we have used two human breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and T47D. In both cell lines LDH5 was the sole isoenzyme. Total ER and PR have been determined by a whole-cell method. In MCF-7 cells (with high ER levels), after incubation with 10(-10) M estradiol, maximal induction of LDH had already been achieved. In relation to T47D (low ER levels) estradiol did not evoke an induction of LDH5 at any concentration examined. In MCF-7 cells, the level of LDH5 induction paralleled processing of ER. The processing effect was rapid, beginning within 5 min of estradiol addition, and was completed within 1 hr. With 10(-6) M tamoxifen, LDH5 induction was suppressed and this effect was reversed by estradiol. Such antiestrogenic effects of tamoxifen on LDH5 have not been observed in T47D cells. Agonistic effects of low doses of tamoxifen on LDH5 were not observed. Our studies suggest that estrogen stimulation of LDH5 involves ER.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Adriamycin, Fluorouracil, Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, with or without Tamoxifen in Operable Breast Cancer

Between January 1982 and February 1985, 70 breast cancer patients with histologically confirmed axillary node involvement and T1–3a were treated following surgery with a combination of adriamycin, fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, with or without tamoxifen according to the estrogen and progesterone receptors state. At 60 months of study (median follow-up, 41 months), the estimated proportion remaining disease-free was 62%. The estimated survival rate was 81%. A comparison of the actuarial disease-free and overall survival with data reported in the literature indicates a similar positive effect of adjuvant systemic therapy as described in adjuvant studies using polychemotherapy regimens. Patient acception of chemotherapy regimen was generally good. This can be accounted for because of an adequate emesis control and real compliance of the patients with the oncologist.

Actions of a progestogen on human breast cancer cells: mechanisms of growth stimulation and inhibition

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) reduced the proliferation of MCF-7 cells with a maximal response at 100 nM. A subline ('M' cells) resistant to this action remained responsive to antioestrogen but showed a poor response to dexamethasone (DEX). Experiments with mixtures of MPA and DEX showed that MPA acts on wild-type MCF-7 cells through a glucocorticoid as well as a progestogen mechanism. The growth of 'M' cells was stimulated by MPA at 100 nM or greater and the drug increased polyamine concentrations in 'wild-type' as well as 'M' cells. It is suggested that both progestogen and glucocorticoid receptors may mediate the effects of high-dose MPA therapy in breast cancer. The possible stimulation of the growth of some cell types by MPA requires further investigation.

Prognostic significance of tumor grade in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis

The prognostic significance of histologic tumor grade has been evaluated in 1537 women entered into the Ludwig Trials I-IV of adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer. Tumor grade was determined on histologic review of primary tumor sections by two central review pathologists using a modification of the Bloom and Richardson grading system. The 5-year overall survival rates (+/- SE) were: Grade 1, 86% +/- 2; Grade 2, 70% +/- 2; and Grade 3, 57% +/- 2 (P less than 0.0001). This survival difference was seen in both premenopausal (P less than 0.0001) and postmenopausal (P less than 0.0001) women. Significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) by tumor grade were also observed (P less than 0.0001). The tumor grade determined by the 75 contributing local clinic pathologists was also highly significant for predicting DFS and overall survival. Tumor grade remained a statistically significant prognostic factor for DFS (P less than 0.0001) and overall survival (P less than 0.0001) in multivariate analyses controlling for nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, age, peritumoral vessel invasion, and treatment assigned. In postmenopausal patients for whom adjuvant treatment was compared with no adjuvant therapy, the prognostic significance of tumor grade was modified by the effect of treatment. The presence of vessel invasion by primary tumor cells was a stronger predictor of early recurrence than was increasing tumor grade in postmenopausal patients who received no adjuvant therapy. The higher failure rates for patients with high-grade tumors was due to a larger number of failures in regional and visceral sites. Tumor grade can be determined by any pathologist and allows for selection of a subpopulation of breast cancer patients at high risk for early mortality.

Androgen, estrogen, and progesterone receptor levels in malignant and benign breast tumors: a multivariate analysis approach

Androgens have been frequently used in the treatment of breast cancer. However, objective responses seem to vary according to the steroid hormone receptor expression of the tumor. We have studied the relationship between concentrations of androgen receptors (AR) and those of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors by multiple regression and stratified analysis techniques in 154 cases of primary breast carcinomas and 39 cases of benign tumors. Both the proportion of AR-positive tumors and the concentration of AR were dependent upon the coexpression of ER and PR by the specimens. This association was evident for malignant tumors with predominance of the positive correlation between AR and ER over that of AR and PR in post-menopausal patients. In premenopausal women, ER and PR concentrations were similarly correlated with AR levels. The PR, but not the ER concentration, was positively correlated to AR levels in benign breast tumors. These findings were confirmed by multiple regression, taking into consideration additional information about the patients to build statistical models allowing prediction of AR. Among the other variables considered in building these models--age, menopausal status, weight, height, and clinical stage--only height (using data from all patients) and age (data from post-menopausal women) emerged in addition to ER and PR as significantly explaining the variability of AR as the dependent variable.