Fractionated radiotherapy of small inoperable lesions of the brain using a non-invasive stereotactic frame

Clinical Implementation of Adaptive Helical Tomotherapy: A Unique Approach to Image-Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Image-guided IMRT is a revolutionary concept whose clinical implementation is rapidly evolving. Methods of executing beam intensity modulation have included individually designed compensators, static multi-leaf collimators (MLC), dynamic MLC, and sequential (serial) tomotherapy. We have developed helical tomotherapy as an innovative solution to overcome some of the limitations of other IMRT systems. The unique physical design of helical tomotherapy allows the realization of the concepts of adaptive radiotherapy and conformal avoidance. In principle, these advances should improve normal tissue sparing and permit dose reconstruction and verification, thereby allowing significant biologically effective dose escalation.

Recent radiobiological findings can be translated into altered fractionation schemes that aim to improve the local control and long-term survival. This strategy is being tested at the University of Wisconsin using helical tomotherapy with its highly precise delivery and verification system along with meticulous and practical forms of immobilization. Innovative techniques such optical guidance, respiratory gating, and ultrasound assessments are being designed and tailored for helical tomotherapy use. The intrinsic capability of helical tomotherapy for megavoltage CT (MVCT) imaging for IMRT image-guidance is being optimized.

The unique features of helical tomotherapy might allow implementation of image-guided IMRT that was previously impossible or impractical. Here we review the technological, physical, and radiobiological rationale for the ongoing and upcoming clinical trials that will use image-guided IMRT in the form of helical tomotherapy; and we describe our plans for testing our hypotheses in a rigorous prospective fashion.

Dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of dose distribution perturbation due to head heterogeneities for Linac and Gamma Knife stereotactic radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

In SRT/SRS, dedicated treatment planning systems are used for the calculation of the dose distribution. The majority of these systems utilize the standard TMR/OAR formalism for dose calculation as well as they usually neglect any perturbation due to head heterogeneities. The aim of this study is to examine the errors due to head heterogeneities for both absolute and relative dose distributions in stereotactic radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dosimetric measurements in phantoms have been made for linac stereotactic irradiation. CT-based phantoms have been used for Monte Carlo simulations for both linac-based stereotactic system and Gamma Knife unit. Absolute and relative dose distributions have been compared between homogeneous and heterogeneous media. DVH and TCP results are presented for all cases.

RESULTS

The maximum absolute dose difference at the isocenter was 2.2% and 6.9% for the linac and Gamma Knife respectively. The impact of heterogeneity in the target DVH was minor for the linac technique whereas considerable difference was observed for the Gamma Knife treatment. This was reflected also to the radiobiological evaluation, where the maximum TCP difference for the linac system was 2.7% and for the Gamma Knife was 4%.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The errors rising from the existence of head heterogeneities are not negligible especially for the Gamma Knife which uses lower energy beams. The errors of the absolute dose calculation could be easily eliminated by implementing a simple heterogeneity correction algorithm at the TPS. Nevertheless, the errors for not taking into account the lateral electron transport would require a more sophisticated approach and even direct Monte Carlo calculation.

Towards a noninvasive intracranial tumor irradiation using 3d optical imaging and multimodal data registration

Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) results in high-precision tumor volume irradiation. In fractioned radiotherapy (FRT), lesions are irradiated in several sessions so that healthy neighbouring tissues are better preserved than when treatment is carried out in one fraction. In the case of intracranial tumors, classical methods of patient positioning in the irradiation machine coordinate system are invasive and only allow for CRT in one irradiation session. This contribution presents a noninvasive positioning method representing a first step towards the combination of CRT and FRT. The 3D data used for the positioning is point clouds spread over the patient's head (CT-data usually acquired during treatment) and points distributed over the patient's face which are acquired with a structured light sensor fixed in the therapy room. The geometrical transformation linking the coordinate systems of the diagnosis device (CT-modality) and the 3D sensor of the therapy room (visible light modality) is obtained by registering the surfaces represented by the two 3D point sets. The geometrical relationship between the coordinate systems of the 3D sensor and the irradiation machine is given by a calibration of the sensor position in the therapy room. The global transformation, computed with the two previous transformations, is sufficient to predict the tumor position in the irradiation machine coordinate system with only the corresponding position in the CT-coordinate system. Results obtained for a phantom show that the mean positioning error of tumors on the treatment machine isocentre is 0.4 mm. Tests performed with human data proved that the registration algorithm is accurate (0.1 mm mean distance between homologous points) and robust even for facial expression changes.

CHAINED LIGHTNING, PART II

THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE in the radiosurgical treatment of neurological conditions is the delivery of energy to a lesion with minimal injury to surrounding structures. The development of radiosurgical techniques from Leksell's original design has focused on the refinement of various methodologies to achieve energy containment within a target. This article is the second in a series reviewing the evolution of radiosurgical instruments with respect to issues of energy beam generation and delivery for improved conformal therapy.

Continuing with concepts introduced in an earlier article, this article examines specific aspects of beam delivery and the emergence of stereotactic radiosurgery as a measure for focusing energy beams within a target volume. The application of stereotactic principles and devices to gamma ray and linear accelerator-based energy sources provides the methodology by which energy beams are generated and targeted precisely in a focal lesion. Advanced technological systems are reviewed, including fixed beams, dynamic radiosurgery, multileaf collimation, beam shaping, and robotics as various approaches for manipulating beam delivery. Radiosurgical instruments are also compared with regard to mechanics, geometry, and dosimetry. Finally, new radiosurgical designs currently on the horizon are introduced. In exploring the complex history of radiosurgery, it is evident that the discovery and rediscovery of ideas invariably leads to the development of innovative technology for the next generation.

Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems—3D revisited: Comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT

PURPOSE

The repositioning accuracy of mask-based fixation systems has been assessed with two-dimensional/two-dimensional or two-dimensional/three-dimensional (3D) matching. We analyzed the accuracy of commercially available head mask systems, using true 3D/3D matching, with X-ray volume imaging and cone-beam CT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-one patients receiving radiotherapy (intracranial/head-and-neck tumors) were evaluated (14 patients with rigid and 7 with thermoplastic masks). X-ray volume imaging was analyzed online and offline separately for the skull and neck regions. Translation/rotation errors of the target isocenter were analyzed. Four patients were treated to neck sites. For these patients, repositioning was aided by additional body tattoos. A separate analysis of the setup error on the basis of the registration of the cervical vertebra was performed. The residual error after correction and intrafractional motility were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean length of the displacement vector for rigid masks was 0.312 +/- 0.152 cm (intracranial) and 0.586 +/- 0.294 cm (neck). For the thermoplastic masks, the value was 0.472 +/- 0.174 cm (intracranial) and 0.726 +/- 0.445 cm (neck). Rigid masks with body tattoos had a displacement vector length in the neck region of 0.35 +/- 0.197 cm. The intracranial residual error and intrafractional motility after X-ray volume imaging correction for rigid masks was 0.188 +/- 0.074 cm, and was 0.134 +/- 0.14 cm for thermoplastic masks.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study have demonstrated that rigid masks have a high intracranial repositioning accuracy per se. Given the small residual error and intrafractional movement, thermoplastic masks may also be used for high-precision treatments when combined with cone-beam CT. The neck region repositioning accuracy was worse than the intracranial accuracy in both cases. However, body tattoos and image guidance improved the accuracy. Finally, the combination of both mask systems with 3D image guidance has the potential to replace therapy simulation and intracranial stereotaxy.

Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Targets

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a technique for treating intracranial lesions with a high dose of ionizing radiation, usually in a single session, using a stereotactic apparatus for accurate localization and patient immobilization. This article describes several modalities of SRS and some of its applications, particularly for intracranial lesions.

Treatment accuracy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the geometric accuracy of the delivery of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for brain tumours using the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) relocatable frame. Accuracy of treatment delivery was measured via portal images acquired with an amorphous silicon based electronic portal imager (EPI). Results were used to assess the existing verification process and to review the current margins used for the expansion of clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were immobilized in a GTC frame. Target volume definition was performed on localization CT and MRI scans and a CTV to PTV margin of 5mm (based on initial experience) was introduced in 3D. A Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) fiducial system was used for stereotactic coordinate definition. The existing verification process consisted of an intercomparison of the coordinates of the isocentres and anatomy between the localization and verification CT scans. Treatment was delivered with 6 MV photons using four fixed non-coplanar conformal fields using a multi-leaf collimator. Portal imaging verification consisted of the acquisition of orthogonal images centred through the treatment isocentre. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) created from the CT localization scans were used as reference images. Semi-automated matching software was used to quantify set up deviations (displacements and rotations) between reference and portal images.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty six anterior and 123 lateral portal images were available for analysis for set up deviations. For displacements, the total errors in the cranial/caudal direction were shown to have the largest SD's of 1.2 mm, while systematic and random errors reached SD's of 1.0 and 0.7 mm, respectively, in the cranial/caudal direction. The corresponding data for rotational errors (the largest deviation was found in the sagittal plane) was 0.7 degrees SD (total error), 0.5 degrees (systematic) and 0.5 degrees (random). The total 3D displacement was 1.8 mm (mean), 0.8 mm (SD) with a range of 0.3-3.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal imaging has shown that the existing verification and treatment delivery techniques currently in use result in highly reproducible setups. Random and systematic errors in the treatment planning and delivery chain will always occur, but monitoring and minimising them is an essential component of quality control. Portal imaging provides fast and accurate facility for monitoring patients on treatment and the results of this study have shown that a reduction in CTV to PTV margin from 5 to 4 mm (resulting in a considerable increase in the volume of normal tissue sparing) could be made.

CT verification of isocentre relocatability using stereotactic mask fixation system

AIMS

This study introduces a non-invasive method based on computed tomography (CT) verification to ensure patients are accurately positioned before fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. It enables quality control of mask positioning with reference to the CT images of the treatment plan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mask system, together with a dental impression moulded mouth bite, was used for patient immobilisation. In order to facilitate relevant image comparison, special alignment during CT localisation was discussed in the study. The accuracy of patient set-up was studied by assessing the isocentre position in relation to the patient's anatomical structure. The planning CT images were applied as a reference and the study was applied to 261 cranial applications.

RESULTS

The results show that the mean and the maximum overall displacements at the isocentre were 0.7 and 2.5 mm, respectively. The mean and the maximum rotational displacement in the axial plane were 0.56 degrees and 2 degrees, respectively. The mean translational displacement and rotational displacement were close to zero when considering the direction of movement.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the systematic error of the mask system and the verification method are minimal. Advantages of this technique include the simple set-up, three-dimensional quantification and short study time (10-15 min). It is therefore practical to implement on a routine basis. Investigation of the ability to relocate the mask is also recommended to justify the required safety margin between the clinical and planning target volumes.

Isocenter accuracy in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy using implanted fiducials

PURPOSE

The stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) system verifies isocenter accuracy in patient space. In this study, we evaluate isocenter accuracy in frameless SRT using implanted cranial gold markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed frameless SRT on 43 intracranial tumor patients between August 1997 and December 2000. The treatment technique was determined by the tumor shape and volume, and by the location of critical organs. The coordinates of anterior-posterior and lateral port film were inputted to ISOLOC software, which calculated (1) the couch moves translation distance required to bring the target point to the isocenter, and (2) the intermarker distance comparisons between the CT study and the treatment machine films. We evaluated the isocenter deviation based on the error between orthogonal film target coordinates and isocenter coordinates.

RESULTS

The mean treatment isocenter deviations (x, y, z) were -0.03, 0.14, and -0.04 mm, respectively. The systematic component isocenter standard deviations were 0.28, 0.31, and 0.35 mm (1 SD), respectively, and the random component isocenter standard deviations were 0.53, 0.52, and 0.50 mm (1 SD), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The isocenter accuracy in the frameless SRT-implanted fiducial system is highly reliable and is comparable to that of other stereotactic radiosurgery systems.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: a short review

Currently, optimally precise delivery of intracranial radiotherapy is possible with stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. We present in this article a review of the underlying basic physical and radiobiological principles of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and review the clinical experience for ateriovenus malformations, pituitary adenomas, mengiomas, vestibular schwanomas, low grade astrocytomas, malignant gliomas, and brain metastases.

Assessment of patient-independent intrinsic error for a noninvasive frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

The purpose of our study was to examine the extent of patient-independent intrinsic error associated with multiple, repeat remounting of the Laitinen Stereoadapter. The Laitinen frame was repeatedly mounted on a solid water phantom and imaged using computed tomography (CT). The phantom contained five targets located in the center, anterior, right, left, and posterior orientations. The images were processed, fused, and analyzed on the Pinnacle 3-D treatment planning system. The coordinate values (in the x, y, and z directions) for each target were determined for each mounting, and an absolute mean deviation was calculated for 11 repetitions. The mean deviation in the x, y, and z direction for the central and right target, and in the x and y direction for the posterior and anterior target was less than 2.0 mm. However, the mean error in the z direction of the anterior and posterior targets was 1.79 +/- 1.02 mm and 2.20 +/- 1.32 mm, respectively. Rotational misalignment during repeat frame fixation contributed to the observed deviations and in particular affected the antero-posterior plane. With the exception of two occasions where an obvious mounting error occurred, a significant portion of error from remounting the Laitinen Stereoadapter is associated with the operator and the imaging process. The observation of an angular displacement around the axis through the earplugs suggests that a certain degree of rotational misalignment in daily remounting is possible. Targets in the antero-posterior plane are most susceptible to localization error as a consequence of rotational misalignment. In summary, the overall error is within the limits of current imaging technology but not within submillimeter accuracy. Clinical application should take these errors into consideration when designing field margins.

The TALON removable head frame system for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy: measurement of the repositioning accuracy

PURPOSE

To present the TALON removable head frame system as an immobilization device for single-fraction intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMRS) and fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FS-IMRT); and to evaluate the repositioning accuracy by measurement of anatomic landmark coordinates in repeated computed tomography (CT) examinations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine patients treated by fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy underwent repeated CTs during their treatment courses. We evaluated anatomic landmark coordinates in a total of 26 repeat CT data sets and respective x, y, and z shifts relative to their positions in the nine treatment-planning reference CTs. An iterative optimization algorithm was employed using a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomic landmark measurements relative to the original image set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y, and z components of translation of the target isocenter for each repeat CT. In addition to absolute target isocenter translation, the magnitude (sum vector) of isocenter motion and the patient/target rotation about the three principal axes were calculated.

RESULTS

Anatomic landmark analysis over a treatment course of 6 weeks revealed a mean target isocenter translation of 0.95 +/- 0.55, 0.58 +/- 0.46, and 0.51 +/- 0.38 mm in x, y, and z directions, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 1.38 +/- 0.48 mm. The 95% confidence interval ([CI], mean translation plus two standard deviations) for repeated isocenter setup accuracy over the 6-week period was 2.34 mm. Average rotations about the x, y, and z axes were 0.41 +/- 0.36, 0.29 +/- 0.25, and 0.18 +/- 0.15 degrees, respectively. Analysis of the accuracy of the first repeated setup control, representative of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery situations, resulted in a mean target isocenter translation in the x, y, and z directions of 0.52 +/- 0.38, 0.56 +/- 0.30, and 0.46 +/- 0.25 mm, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 0.99 +/- 0.28 mm. The 95% confidence interval for these radiosurgery situations was 1.55 mm. Average rotations at first repeated setup control about the x, y, and z axes were 0.24 +/- 0.19, 0.19 +/- 0.17, and 0.19 +/- 0.12 degrees, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The TALON relocatable head frame was seen to be well suited for immobilization and repositioning of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. Because of its unique removable design, the system was also seen to provide excellent repeat immobilization and alignment for fractionated stereotactic applications. The exceptional accuracy for the single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgical application of the system was seen to deteriorate only slightly over a 6-week fractionated stereotactic treatment course.

Three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment planning and delivery for low- and intermediate-grade gliomas

Three-Dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D-CRT) planning and delivery is an external beam radiation therapy modality that has the general goal of conforming the shape of a prescribed dose volume to the shape of a 3-dimensional target volume, simultaneously limiting dose to critical normal structures. 3-Dimensional conformal therapy should include at least one volumetric imaging study of the patient. This image should be obtained in the treatment position for visualizing the target and normal anatomic structures that are potentially within the irradiated volume. Most often, computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used; however, recently, other imaging modalities such as functional MRI, MR spectroscopy, and positron emission tomography (PET) scans have been used to visualize the clinically relevant volumes. This article will address the clinically relevant issues with regard to low- and intermediate-grade gliomas and the role of 3D-CRT planning. Specific issues that will be addressed will include normal tissue tolerance, target definition, treatment field design in regard to isodose curves and dose-volume histograms, and immobilization.

Repositioning accuracy with the Laitinen frame for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy in adult and pediatric brain tumors: preliminary report

PURPOSE

To determine the repositioning accuracy, patient tolerance, and clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiation therapy for brain tumors in children and adults performed with the Laitinen stereotactic localizer and head holder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, stereotactic frame tolerance was assessed by recording patient discomfort or pain in the ear and nose during each treatment in 34 patients, including 21 children and 13 adults with 37 lesions treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy. Radiation doses ranged from 10-60 Gy at 1.0-4.0 Gy per fraction. Repositioning accuracy was assessed by comparing portal radiographs with setup fields on computed tomographic (CT) scout images. Clinical efficacy was assessed by analyzing posttreatment CT and magnetic resonance images.

RESULTS

The stereotactic localizer was well tolerated. The mean isocenter shifts observed after studying 305 portal radiographs were x-coordinate shift of 1.0 mm +/- 0.7 (SD), y-coordinate shift of 0.8 mm +/- 0.8, and z-coordinate shift of 1.7 mm +/- 1.0. At a median follow-up of 16 months, local control was achieved in 18 of 22 primary and in one of eight of recurrent tumors.

CONCLUSION

The Laitinen stereotactic localizer is well tolerated with accurate reproducibility during stereotactic radiation therapy. Preliminary local control rates are consistent with those in other reports.

Accuracy of a photogrammetry-based patient positioning and monitoring system for radiation therapy

A photogrammetry system designed to reduce simulator-to-treatment and treatment-to-treatment patient positioning errors has been developed. Two complete systems have been installed in our department: one in the simulator room and one in a treatment room. Each system consists of three charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras; a ring of infrared LEDs around the lens of each camera; and several small, circular, retroreflective markers that are applied to the patient. The markers reflect infrared light directly back to the cameras, producing a binary image of oval hot spots when the image is thresholded. The three-dimensional position of each marker is calculated by conventional photogrammetry methods. At simulation, marker positions are measured, then transferred to the treatment room system. The system may be used to actively position patients, and to passively monitor a patient's position and motion during treatment. Studies have focused on measuring the system's temporal stability, precision, and accuracy; on optimal positioning of markers and cameras; and on assessing the system's capability to reduce the positioning error. The repeatability of measuring a marker's position is <0.1 mm in each orthogonal direction. The accuracy is approximately 0.5 mm over a 40 X 40 X 40 cm3 field of view. The system drift over four hours is approximately +/-0.2 mm. The photogrammetry system has been used to actively position a lead BB, embedded within a head phantom, at the isocenter; repeatability was +/-0.3 mm, as determined radiographically. The system has also been used to passively monitor the positioning of several head and neck patients that were set up by a therapist; setup errors of up to 10 mm in each orthogonal direction were measured, as well as the motion of the patient during treatment.

Daily positioning accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiation therapy with a fusion of computed tomography and linear accelerator (focal) unit: evaluation of z-axis with a z-marker

To evaluate quantitative positioning errors of frameless stereotactic radiation therapy with a fusion of computed tomography (CT) and linear accelerator unit, Z-type CT markers were attached to patients, and CT images were obtained before and after daily treatment. In 40 verification tests, geometrical errors were never more than 1 mm.

A non-invasive immobilization system and related quality assurance for dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy of intracranial and head and neck disease

PURPOSE

To develop and implement a non-invasive immobilization system guided by a dedicated quality assurance (QA) program for dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of intracranial and head and neck disease, with IMRT delivered using the NOMOS Corporation's Peacock System and MIMiC collimator.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thermoplastic face masks are combined with cradle-shaped polyurethane foaming agents and a dedicated quality assurance program to create a customized headholder system (CHS). Plastic shrinkage was studied to understand its effect on immobilization. Fiducial points for computerized tomography (CT) are obtained by placing multiple dabs of barium paste on mask surfaces at intersections of laser projections used for patient positioning. Fiducial lines are drawn on the cradle along laser projections aligned with nasal surfaces. Lateral CT topograms are annotated with a crosshair indicating the origin of the treatment planning and delivery coordinate system, and with lines delineating the projections of superior-inferior field borders of the linear accelerator's secondary collimators, or with those of the fully open MIMiC. Port films exposed with and without the MIMIC are compared to annotated topograms to measure positional variance (PV) in superior-inferior (SI), right-left (RL), and anterior posterior (AP) directions. MIMiC vane patterns superposed on port films are applied to verify planned patterns. A 12-patient study of PV was performed by analyzing positions of 10 anatomic points on repeat CT topograms, plotting histograms of PV, and determining average PV.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A 1.5+/-0.3 mm SD shrinkage per 70 cm of thermoplastic was observed over 24 h. Average PV of 1.0+/-0.8, 1.2+/-1.1, and 1.3+/-0.8 mm were measured in SI, AP, and RL directions, respectively. Lateral port films exposed with and without the MIMiC showed PV of 0.2+/-1.3 and 0.8+/-2.2 mm in AP and SI directions. Vane patterns superimposed on port films consistently verified the planned patterns.

CONCLUSION

The CHS provided adequately reproducible immobilization for dynamic IMRT, and may be applicable to decrease PV for other cranial and head and neck external beam radiation therapy.

Clinical commissioning of Laitinen Stereoadapter for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

The Laitinen Stereoadapter 5000 from Sandstroem Trade and Technology was acceptance tested and commissioned for clinical use in a Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Program at our facility. The frame was implemented to function as a localization device for target delineation rather than as an immobilization device. The frame is of non-invasive nature utilizing ear plugs and a nasion bridge adapter as the connecting points with the patient's head. The reproducibility of the head frame position with respect to external skull reference points was tested. CT and MRI imaging studies were performed on a patient phantom with the stereoadapter in place. The target was delineated and target coordinates were calculated for two implanted targets. The phantom was positioned according to the target coordinates on a Siemens MXE Linear Accelerator by aid of the target positioning lasers. Radiographic port film images were taken with the circular fields typically used in stereotactic radiosurgery. A complete treatment isodose plan was performed and dosimetric accuracy was tested by positioning a small volume ionization chamber at the center of the target volume in the head phantom. The results of these tests were found to be clinically acceptable.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: rationale and methods

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a widely accepted technique for the treatment intracranial neoplasms. Combined with modern imaging modalities, SRS has established its efficacy in a variety of indications. From the outset, however, it was recognized that the delivery of a single large dose of radiation was essentially "bad biology made better by good physics." To achieve the accuracy required to compensate for this biological shortcoming, the application of SRS has required that a neurosurgical head frame of some sort be rigidly attached to the patients head. Historically, this prerequisite has, primarily for practical reasons, precluded the delivery of multiple fractions over multiple days. With recent improvements in immobilization and repeat fixation, the good biology of fractionated delivery has been realized. This technique, which has come to be known as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), has significantly expanded the efficacy of the technique through the use of accurate physical targeting coupled with the basic radiobiological principles gleaned from decades of clinical experience.

Monte Carlo dosimetry study of a 6 MV stereotactic radiosurgery unit

Small-field and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) dosimetry with radiation detectors, used for clinical practice, have often been questioned due to the lack of lateral electron equilibrium and uncertainty in beam energy. A dosimetry study was performed for a dedicated 6 MV SRS unit, capable of generating circular radiation fields with diameters of 1.25-5 cm at isocentre using the BEAM/EGS4 Monte Carlo code. With this code the accelerator was modelled for radiation fields with a diameter as small as 0.5 cm. The radiation fields and dosimetric characteristics (photon spectra, depth doses, lateral dose profiles and cone factors) in a water phantom were evaluated. The cone factor (St) for a specific cone c at depth d is defined as St(d, c) = D(d, c)/D(d, c(ref)), where c(ref) is the reference cone. To verify the Monte Carlo calculations, measurements were performed with detectors commonly used in SRS such as small-volume ion chambers, a diamond detector, TLDs and films. Results show that beam energies vary with cone diameter. For a 6 MV beam, the mean energies in water at the point of maximum dose for a 0.5 cm cone and a 5 cm cone are 2.05 MeV and 1.65 MeV respectively. The values of St obtained by the simulations are in good agreement with the results of the measurements for most detectors. When the lateral resolution of the detectors is taken into account, the results agree within a few per cent for most fields and detectors. The calculations showed a variation of St with depth in the water. Based on calculated electron spectra in water, the validity of the assumption that measured dose ratios are equal to measured detector readings was verified.

A new non-invasive and relocatable immobilization frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

A newly developed non-invasive immobilization frame for stereotactic radiotherapy is presented, which is intended to be used for both imaging (computed tomography (CT) and angiography) and radiotherapeutic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The frame is made of duraluminium so as to be stable and light and it has an elliptical shape. The immobilization is achieved using three stable locations on the patient's head, i.e. the upper dentition, the nose and the back of the neck. The fixation on the three locations ensures complete immobilization in all directions.

RESULTS

The immobilization frame can be fitted as many times as is needed to most heads. In order to assess the accuracy of relocation, repeated fittings on two volunteers and on 22 patients undergoing stereotactic treatment were performed (more than 200 mountings in total), which showed maximum anterior-posterior, inferior-superior and lateral reproducibility in positioning of less than 1 mm in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION

The in-house-constructed stereotactic frame is simple to use, easily made, non-invasive, relocatable and well tolerated by the patients, providing the possibility of multiple fractions. The major advantage of using such a non-invasive stereotactic frame is the flexibility in timing the different diagnostic procedures (CT and angiography) as well as providing the possibility to extend the use to large brain lesions (treatment without an additional collimator) where a high precision is also required. It also offers significant labour and cost saving over the invasive frames and the majority of the non-invasive frames. To date, 22 patients with ages varying between 12 and 70 years have been treated using this method.

[Technical evolution of irradiation in stereotactic conditions: dose fractionation]

The development of non-invasive head fixation systems, allowing 3D determination of the target coordinates, has lead to the increased use of fractionated stereotactic irradiation. These systems have been checked for accuracy and the mean precision of repositioning has been evaluated to +/- 1 mm. With the mean geometrical accuracy set at +/- 1 mm, a 2 mm safety margin is usually added to the clinical target volume in order to define the planning target volume. Quality assurance procedures must conform to the required precision of the technique while remaining realistic in day-to-day use relative to planned conventional treatments. Biologically different from single dose irradiation, the fractionated stereotactic irradiation completes the range of techniques used in the treatment of intra-cerebral lesions.

[Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: results in hypophyseal adenomas, acoustic neurinomas, and meningiomas of the cavernous sinus]

PURPOSE

In order to optimize cerebral benign tumor irradiation, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy allows a focused-volume irradiation (2.1 cm3, 16 mm diameter) under standard fractionation conditions. Results of a retrospective and multicentric analysis are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy uses the ballistic principles of the radiosurgery: stereotactic localization, multi-beam irradiation, secondary collimation, three-dimensional dosimetry. Standard fractionation is possible with a re-locatable non-invasive stereotactic device. The technique has been used for treating pituitary adenomas (86 patients), acoustic neuromas (32 patients) and cavernous meningiomas (26 patients).

RESULTS

1) pituitary adenomas: cumulative tumoral objective-response rates (42 patients) were respectively 42%, 69% and 88% at 24, 48 and 60 months. The cumulative endocrinologic objective-response rates (32 patients) were respectively 53%, 75% and 85% at 24, 48 and 60 months. The cumulative risk of radio-induced hormonal deficiency varied from 18% (growth hormone [GH]) to 42% for TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) at 48 months. No other complication was observed; 2) acoustic neuromas: 33 tumors, < 25 mm in diameter, were treated in 32 patients. Tumor control was observed in 29/33 tumors: 14 were stable, 15 decreased and three progressed. Useful hearing was maintained in 9/10 patients. Only three patients (9%) presented persistent complications; 3) cavernous meningioma: 17/19 clinical responses were noted, 20 tumoral stabilisations, one partial response and one progression (22 magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] evaluable patients). One unilateral radio-induced blindness was observed.

CONCLUSION

For these benign tumors, the focused target volume obtained by the fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy seems to be better adapted to the treatment of limited benign tumors than standard radiotherapy. The use of standard fractionation reduces the risk of severe normal tissue damage, sometimes observed for radiosurgery and inherent in the use of single fraction.

CT simulation in stereotactic brain radiotherapy--analysis of isocenter reproducibility with mask fixation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

CT verification and measurement of isocenter deviation using repeated mask fixation in linac-based stereotactic high dose radiotherapy of brain metastases were performed in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases a commercial head mask fixation device based on thermoplastic materials (BrainLAB) was used. A two-step planning-treatment procedure was performed. Immediately before treatment the patient was relocated in the mask and a verification CT scan of the radiopaque marked isocenter was performed and if necessary its position was corrected. The verification procedure is described in detail. Twenty-two CT verifications in 16 patients were analyzed. Deviations were measured separately for each direction. A 3D-deviation vector was calculated. Additionally the average amount of deviation in each of the three dimensions was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean deviation and standard deviation (SD) of the isocenter was 0.4 mm (SD 1.5 mm) in the longitudinal direction, -0.1 mm (SD 1.8 mm) in the lateral direction and 0.1 mm (SD 1.2 mm) in the anterior-posterior direction. The mean three-dimensional distance (3D-vector) between the verified and the corrected isocenter was 2.4 mm (SD 1.3 mm). The average deviation (without consideration of direction) was 1.1 mm (SD 1.1 mm), 1.3 mm (SD 1.3 mm) and 0.8 mm (SD 0.9 mm) in the longitudinal, lateral and sagittal directions, respectively. No correlation was found between 3D-deviation and the distance of the isocenter from the reference plane nor between deviation and the position of metastases in the brain (central versus peripheral or between different lobes), or the date of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Reproducibility of the isocenter using the presented mask fixation is in the range of positioning reproducibility reported for other non-invasive fixation devices for stereotactic brain treatment. Our results underline the importance of CT verification as a quality assurance method in stereotactic radiotherapy. Under the condition of a preceding CT verification the mask can be used for single dose stereotactic radiotherapy. For fractionated stereotactic irradiation of small target volumes we recommend repeated CT verifications to assure reproducibility.

The University of Florida frameless high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system

PURPOSE

To develop and test a system for high precision fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy that separates immobilization and localization devices.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patient localization is achieved through detection and digital registration of an independent bite plate system. The bite plate is made and linked to a set of six infrared light emitting diodes (IRLEDs). These IRLEDs are detected by an infrared camera system that identifies the position of each IRLED within 0.1 to 0.15 mm. Calibration of the camera system defines isocenter and translational X, Y, and Z axes of the stereotactic radiosurgery subsystem and thereby digitally defines the virtual treatment room space in a computer linked to the camera system. Positions of the bite plate's IRLEDs are processed digitally using a computer algorithm so that positional differences between an actual bite plate position and a desired position can be resolved within 0.1 mm of translation (X, Y, and Z distance) and 0.1 degree of rotation. Furthermore, bite plate misalignment can be displayed digitally in real time with translational (x, y, and z) and rotational (roll, pitch, and yaw) parameters for an actual bite plate position. Immobilization is achieved by a custom head mold and thermal plastic mask linked by hook-and-loop fastener tape. The head holder system permits rotational and translational movements for daily treatment positioning based on the bite plate localization system. Initial testing of the localization system was performed on 20 patients treated with radiosurgery. The system was used to treat 11 patients with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Assessment of bite plate localization in radiosurgery patients revealed that the patient's bite plate could be positioned and repositioned within 0.5 +/- 0.3 mm (standard deviation). After adjustments, the first 11 patients were treated with the bite plate repositioning error reduced to 0.2 +/- 0.1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

High precision stereotactic radiotherapy can be delivered using separate localization and immobilization systems. Treatment setup and delivery can be accomplished in 15 min or less. Advantages compared with standard systems require further study.

A precision repeat localization head frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

An immobilization device was constructed for Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) based on registration of the teeth and facial bones in a single thermoplastic mask system, along with a custom hardened foam pillow for posterior head immobilization relative to the mask. The unit interfaces mechanically with all of our current radiosurgery equipment and can be used with any standard stereotactic planning system. After initial trials to design a reproducible radiographic localization test, we performed a series of daily AP and Lateral port films on 3 patients over five isocenters. Seventy-nine films were reviewed and the maximum deviation in anatomical projection in both sagittal and coronal planes was less than 2 mm, with over 60% of films showing no distinguishable deviations from initial port films. Ninety-three percent of the test films showed a repositioning accuracy of less than 1 mm for all tested structures. We have developed an accurate, non-invasive means of repeat head immobilization that, when properly constructed, can facilitate precise fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy with patient comfort, ease of construction and long term stability.

The effect of setup uncertainties on the radiobiological advantage of fractionation in stereotaxic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

There may be radiobiological advantages in administering stereotaxic radiation treatment in multiple fractions instead of by a single irradiation. However, a larger planning target volume may be required for fractionated stereotaxic radiotherapy than for a single session treatment, if decreased geometrical precision and increased setup uncertainty are associated with multiple-fraction treatments. This factor may partially offset the radiobiological gain. The purpose of this study is to estimate the potential therapeutic gain of fractionated treatments for brain tumors, and to assess the effect of increased setup uncertainty on the potential gain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The concept of biologically effective dose (BED), based on the linear quadratic (LQ) model, was used to quantify the therapeutic efficacy of the respective treatment schema. Therapeutic gain (TG) was defined as the ratio of tumor BEDs, for multiple fractions and single treatment, respectively, for the same normal brain BED. To include the effect of increased planning volume in fractionated treatment, a power-law relationship was assumed for the volume dependence of prescription dose, and the TG was recalculated using the "volume-adjusted" doses.

RESULTS

The therapeutic gain for fractionated treatment increases with fraction number, and is smaller for larger single treatment doses. For example, in going from 1 to 10 fractions, the TG is 1.40, 1.32, or 1.27 for single treatment dose of 20, 30, or 40 Gy, respectively. Also, the TG is more significant for the initial few fractions. The benefit of fractionation is diminished if larger planning volume is needed for multiple fraction treatments. For example, the above TG are reduced to 1.19, 1.11, or 1.06, if a 2 cm planning target volume in single fraction treatment is enlarged to 2.3 cm in fractionated treatment.

CONCLUSION

Consideration of the therapeutic gain with fractionation should include estimates of setup uncertainty for multiple-fraction treatments, relative to that of single fraction radiosurgery.

A comparison of dosimetry techniques in stereotactic radiosurgery

Accurate dosimetry of small-field photon beams used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be made difficult because of the presence of lateral electronic disequilibrium and steep dose gradients. In the published literature, data acquisition for radiosurgery is mainly based on diode and film dosimetry, and sometimes on small ionization chamber or thermolominescence dosimetry. These techniques generally do not provide the required precision because of their energy dependence and/or poor resolution. In this work PTW diamond detectors and Monte Carlo (EGS4) techniques have been added to the above tools to measure and calculate SRS treatment planning requirements. The validity of the EGS4 generated data has been confirmed by comparing results to those obtained with an ionization chamber, where the field size is large enough for electronic equilibrium to be established at the central axis. Using EGS4 calculations, the beam characteristics under the experimental conditions have also been quantified. It was shown that diamond detectors are potentially ideal for SRS and yield more accurate results than the above traditional modes of dosimetry.

Characteristics of a dedicated linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery-radiotherapy unit

A stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) system on a dedicated Varian Clinac-600SR linear accelerator with Brown-Roberts-Wells and Gill-Thomas-Cosman relocatable frames along with the Radionics (RSA) planning system is evaluated. The Clinac-600SR has a single 6-MV beam with the same beam characteristics as that of the mother unit, the Clinac-600C. The primary collimator is a fixed cone projecting to a 10-cm diameter at isocenter. The secondary collimator is a heavily shielded cylindrical collimator attached to the face plate of the primary collimator. The tertiary collimation consists of the actual treatment cones. The cone sizes vary from 12.5 to 40.0 mm diameter. The mechanical stability of the entire system was verified. The variations in isocenter position with table, gantry, and collimator rotation were found to be < 0.5 mm with a compounded accuracy of < or = 1.0 mm. The radiation leakage under the cones was < 1% measured at a depth of 5 cm in a phantom. The beam profiles of all cones in the x and y directions were within +/- 0.5 mm and match with the physical size of the cone. The dosimetric data such as tissue maximum ratio, off-axis ratio, and cone factor were taken using film, diamond detector, and ion chambers. The mechanical and dosimetric characteristics including dose linearity of this unit are presented and found to be suitable for SRS/SRT. The difficulty in absolute dose measurement for small cone is discussed.

A noninvasive, reattachable skull fiducial marker system. Technical note

As computer-interactive technologies become more widely used in neurosurgery, radiology, and radiation therapy, the need for an optimum skull fiducial marker system increases. In the past, intracranial localization methods required precisely machined metal frames and rigid pin fixation to the skull. Recently, this function has been performed using "frameless" computer-based systems that calculate brain position relative to a series of external reference points, the most accurate of which are screwed directly into the skull. A penetrating fiducial marker system, however, is not well suited for applications requiring multiple volume registrations over an extended time period. We describe a new skull fiducial marker system that attaches to the maxillary teeth and can be used repeatedly on different occasions. A curved bar, known as a Banana Bar (BB) extends backward from a custom mouthpiece around the side of the patient's head; the bar contains sites of attachment for screw-in radiographic fiducial markers. Repositioning accuracy was quantitated using a photographic technique. A BB prototype was constructed and tested in three subjects. The BB weighs less than 100 g and can be comfortably held in position for up to 30 minutes. It takes less than 1 minute to screw in the mouthpiece and only seconds to secure the BB to the teeth. One hundred twenty photographic measurements were analyzed from 60 repositionings over a minimum 3-week period. Standard deviations for the measurement series ranged from 0.29 to 0.86 mm. Results suggest that the BB may be an inexpensive, efficient, and accurate method for providing the external reference points needed for a wide range of emerging computer-interactive applications.

Fractionated radiation therapy in the treatment of stage III and IV cerebello-pontine angle neurinomas: long-term results in 24 cases

PURPOSE

To reevaluate long-term results of fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in a previously published series of cerebello-pontine angle neurinomas (CPA).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 1986 to May 1992, 24 patients with Stage III and IV CPA neurinomas were treated with external fractionated RT; 7 patients had phacomatosis. One patient was irradiated on both sides and indications for radiotherapy were as follows: (a) poor general condition or old age contraindicating surgery, 14 cases; (b) hearing preservation in bilateral neurinomas after contralateral tumor removal, 5 cases; (c) partial resection or high risk of recurrence after subsequent surgery for relapse, 4 cases; (d) nonsurgical relapse, 2 cases. Most patients were irradiated with 9 MV photons. A three- to four-field technique with coned-down portals was used. Doses were calculated on a 95% isodose and were given 5 days a week for a mean total dose of 51 Gy (1.80 Gy/fraction).

RESULTS

Median follow-up from RT was 60 months (7 to 84); five patients died, two with progressive disease. Two patients underwent total tumor removal after RT (one stable and one growing tumor). On the whole, tumor shrinkage was observed in 9 patients (36%), stable disease in 13 (52%), and tumor progression in 3. Hearing was maintained in 3 out of 5 hearing patients with phacomatosis.

CONCLUSION

Fractionated RT appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Stage III and IV CPA neurinomas. Hearing can be preserved for a long time.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for pediatric and adult brain tumors: preliminary report

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a new modality that combines the accurate focal dose delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery with the biological advantages of conventional radiotherapy (1.8-2.0 Gy/day using 25-30 fractions). The modality requires sophisticated treatment planning, dedicated high-energy linear accelerator, and relocatable immobilization devices. We report here our early experience using stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial neoplasms.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 1992 and September 1993, we treated 82 patients with central nervous system lesions using stereotactic radiotherapy, delivered from a dedicated 6 MV stereotactic linear accelerator. A head fixation frame provided daily relocatable setup using a dental plate for all patients over 8 years of age. A modified head frame, which does not require a mouthpiece, was used for children requiring anesthesia. The patients ranged in age from 9 months to 76 years. Thirty-three patients were children less than 21 years of age. Selection criteria for the protocol included: (a) focal, small (< 5 cm) radiographically distinct lesions known to be radiocurable (pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, pilocytic astrocytoma, retinoblastoma), and (b) lesions located in regions not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery such as the brain stem or chiasm. Standard fractionation and conventional doses were delivered. Patients with low-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, or ependymoma were treated using a dose escalation regime consisting of conventional doses plus a 10% increase.

RESULTS

Although follow-up is 16 months (range 3-16 months), posttreatment radiographic studies in 77 patients have been consistent with changes similar to those found after conventional radiation therapy. To date, reduction of up to 50% of the original volume has been noted in 19 out of 77 patients, and 4 patients had a complete response, 2 with dysgerminoma, and 1 each with astrocytoma and retinoblastoma. In 56 patients disease was either stable or the follow-up was too short for evaluation. While the follow-up is relatively short, there have been no in-field or marginal recurrences. The only unexpected radiographic findings were in three patients with pilocytic astrocytomas, who developed asymptomatic edema in the treatment volume. Accuracy in daily fractionation was excellent. In over 2000 patient setups with 41,000 scalp measurements, reproducibility was found to be within 0.41 mm (median) of baseline readings, allowing for precise immobilization throughout the treatment course. The treatment in all cases was well tolerated with minimal acute effects. Our stereotactic radiotherapy facility can provide fractionated therapy for 10-12 patients a day efficiently and accurately.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment and relocatable stereotactic head frames were well tolerated with minimal acute effects. No long-term sequelae have been noted, although the observation period is short. To fully define the role of stereotactic radiotherapy, we are conducting prospective studies to evaluate neurocognitive and neuroendocrine effects. We expect that this innovative approach will make a significant impact on the treatment of intracranial neoplasms, particularly in children.

Adaptation and verification of the relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame in stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) combines techniques of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with radiation therapy fractionation schemes. Fractionation in SRT necessitates a relocatable immobilization system to precisely reproduce the patient's position at each treatment. The Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) head frame is such an immobilization device compatible with the Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) stereotactic system. We describe this device, our modifications to the original design, the repeat position accuracy, and the daily verification procedure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The original GTC frame was tested on volunteers. This testing led to an improved strapping system, the decision to construct the oral fixation appliance at our dental clinic, and the construction of a depth confirmation helmet to rapidly confirm the position of the frame on a daily basis. The GTC frame, at our institution, is not acceptable for children requiring anesthesia, and a new frame, the "Boston Childrens' Hospital" frame, was designed. This device uses the base ring of the GTC frame. Airway access is maintained through fixation on the nasal-glabellar region and the ear canal rather than the hard palate and upper gingiva.

RESULTS

The modifications of the GTC frame and the verification protocol result in repeat positioning of the frame with respect to the patient anatomy, with a standard deviation of 0.4 mm for both the modified GTC frame and the Boston Childrens' Hospital frame. The relocatibility of the frames has been established in over 2,000 patient setups in over 60 patients to date.

DISCUSSION

The GTC frame is a noninvasive and versatile fixation system that provides patient comfort, as well as accurate relocatibility for SRT. The frame is not appropriate for single fraction radiosurgery, as a large setup error (> 2 mm) for a single treatment cannot be excluded. The GTC frame is compatible with the BRW system, and treatment planning for SRT and SRS patients is identical. We currently treat 10-13 SRT patients per day with intracranial neoplasms on a dedicated stereotactic therapy unit. In addition, the Boston Childrens' Hospital frame allows the use of stereotactic therapy in the treatment of children under 6 years of age. This population will benefit especially from precise and highly focal cranial irradiation.

Stereotactic radiotherapy: a technique for dose optimization and escalation for intracranial tumors

Stereotactic radiosurgery offers the ability to treat relatively small volume intracranial lesions with single fraction, high dose radiotherapy while sparing surrounding tissue due to rapid fall off of dose outside of the treatment volume. Conventional radiotherapy takes advantage of the sparing effects of dose fractionation, but includes relatively large amounts of normal brain in the treatment volume the tolerance of which is dose-limiting. For some intracranial lesions it may not be optimal to treat with large single fractions due to tumor location or size. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy may not be optimum in all cases due to the necessary inclusion of normal structures. Through the development of relocatable head frames, the precision of stereotactic techniques and the biologic advantages of fractionation may be combined in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). We report on the treatment of 68 patients with intracranial lesions using a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator to deliver SRT between June 1992 and June 1993. SRT was used either in order to optimize dose distribution and spare normal tissues in patients with excellent prognosis or in order to increase the dose to tumor while keeping doses to normal tissues below tolerance levels in patients with poorer prognosis (dose escalation). Histologies treated included meningioma, low grade astrocytoma, pituitary adenoma and acoustic neuroma. The most common treatment sites were the parasellar region and cavernous sinuses. Most patients (79%) had surgical debulking prior to SRT. 10-12 patients were treated daily. Patient positioning using relocatable stereotactic frames was highly precise. Acute and subacute side effects were minimal and radiographic responses have been similar to those expected with conventional radiotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A frameless method for stereotactic radiotherapy

A frameless method for stereotactic multiple arc radiotherapy (SMART) is described. Three short gold wires are implanted in the scalp approximately 100 mm apart. These are localized in a computed tomographic or angiographic study along with the target. Subsequently the gold markers are localized on beam films and the target position calculated using a computer program ISOLOC. This program provides the couch movements required to move the target to the isocentre and a micropositioner attached to the couch is used to make the adjustment. Beam films are repeated until the movements required are less than 1 mm in any direction. It is shown that the simple procedures of implanting the markers subcutaneously do not provide a stable reference system in about 25% of patients and the markers are now screwed into the cranium. The precision of the method is evaluated by phantom studies and measurements taken during several hundred treatments.

A technique for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of intracranial tumors

PURPOSE

The excellent treatment results obtained with traditional radiosurgery have stimulated attempts to broaden the range of intracranial disorders treated with radiosurgical techniques. For major users of radiosurgery this resulted in a gradual shift from treating vascular diseases in a single session to treating small, well delineated primary tumors on a fractionated basis. In this paper we present the technique currently used in Montreal for the fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of selected intracranial lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The regimen of six fractions given every other day has been in use for "fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy" in our center for the past 5 years. Our current irradiation technique, however, evolved from our initial method of using the stereotactic frame for target localization and first treatment, and a "halo-ring" with tattoo skin marks for the subsequent treatments. Recently, we developed a more precise irradiation technique, based on an in-house-built stereotactic frame which is left attached to the patient's skull for the duration of the fractionated regimen. Patients are treated with the stereotactic dynamic rotation technique on a 10 MV linear accelerator (linac).

RESULTS

In preparation for the first treatment, the stereotactic frame is attached to the patient's skull and the coordinates of the target center are determined. The dose distribution is then calculated, the target coordinates are marked onto a Lucite target localization box, and the patient is placed into the treatment position on the linac with the help of laser positioning devices. The Lucite target localization box is then removed, the target information is tattooed on the patient's skin, and the patient is given the first treatment. The tattoo marks in conjunction with the target information on the Lucite target localization box are used for patient set-up on the linac for the subsequent 5 treatments. The location of the target center is marked with radio-opaque markers on the target localization box and verified with a computerized tomography scanner prior to the second treatment. The same verification is done prior to other treatments when the target center indicated by the target localization box disagrees with that indicated by the tattoo marks. The new position of the target center is then determined and used for treatment positioning.

CONCLUSION

The in-house-built frame is inexpensive and easily left attached to the patient's skull for the 12 day duration of the fractionated regimen. Positioning with the Lucite target localization box verified with tattoo marks ensures a high level of precision for individual fractionated treatments.

A halo-ring technique for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

Stereotactic radiosurgery has become established as an effective treatment modality for certain non-malignant brain diseases such as arteriovenous malformations. This paper describes an extension of our linear accelerator-based radiosurgical technique to fractionated treatment of intracranial disease. The fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy technique expands the use of the modality by sparing normal cells within the treatment volume thus improving the therapeutic ratio. The first treatment is given using a stereotactic frame both for target localization and patient immobilization. The frame is then removed and subsequent treatments use a standard neurosurgical halo-ring for patient immobilization. The halo-ring is left in place on the skull for the duration of the course of treatment. Thus the physical requirements for fractionation pertain firstly to the patient immobilization and target localization using the halo-ring and secondly to the stringent quality assurance procedures required to maintain spatial accuracy under these new conditions. We describe a sensitive and effective technique for checking the rotational beam parameters and collimator alignment which we use immediately prior to treatment to ensure adequate accuracy of dose delivery to the target volume.

The radiobiology of radiosurgery: rationale for different treatment regimes for AVMs and malignancies

Based on basic radiobiological principles, we suggest that the radiosurgery technique of delivering a radiation dose in a single fraction, whilst appropriate for benign brain lesions such as arteriovenous malformations (AVM), is not optimal for treating malignant tumors. Radiosurgery was originally developed to treat benign lesions in the brain, such as AVMs, and has been successfully used for this purpose for over four decades. Recently, the technique has been adopted for treating small primary malignant brain tumors or single metastases. We argue, and derive radio-biological data to support the view that, treating malignant tumors with a single fraction will result in a suboptimal therapeutic ratio between tumor control and late effects, even for small tumors; and that improved therapeutic ratios would be expected if the treatment were fractionated into a small number of fractions. On the other hand, no therapeutic gain is to be expected from fractionating treatment of AVMs. A new generation of noninvasive relocatable stereotactic head frames makes feasible the use of fractionated stereotactic external-beam radiotherapy, and may allow significant benefits over single, radiosurgical, treatments for malignant brain tumors. As stereotactic fractionation/protraction regimes become more widespread, a uniform approach for determining equivalent fractionation schemes becomes important for intercomparing clinical results, and such calculations can be reliably carried out using the linear-quadratic formalism.

Stereotactic treatment of brain tumors with radioactive implants or external photon beams: radiobiophysical aspects

We perform calculations, based on the linear-quadratic model, to assess the biologically effective doses (BED) of tumor and normal tissue in the stereotactic irradiation of brain tumors with either radioactive implants or radiosurgery techniques. Treatment protocols for radiosurgery and radioactive implants, as obtained from the literature, are reviewed and compared. A figure of merit is defined to be the ratio of tumor to normal tissue BED, expressed in units of Gy10/Gy3. These comparisons indicate a clear radiobiological advantage for brachytherapy, unless the radiosurgery is to be delivered in a large number of fractions. The differences in dose uniformity, and in the volume of normal tissue encompassed by the high dose regions, are factors that may also influence clinical results.