Ten-year results of chemoradiation for anal cancer: focus on late morbidity

Evaluation of dosimetric predictors of toxicity after IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy for anal cancer

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the impact of dosimetric parameters on acute and late toxicity for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in an observational cohort study between 2008 and 2013 (median follow-up 3.4 years). They were treated with standardized target and organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring, planning, and IG-IMRT. Radiotherapy dose, based on clinicopathologic features, ranged from 45 Gy to 63 Gy to gross targets and 27 Gy to 36 Gy to elective targets. Chemotherapy was concurrent 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C (weeks 1&5). Toxicity was prospectively graded using NCI CTCAE v.3 and RTOG scales. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between dose/volume parameters (e.g small bowel V5) and corresponding grade 2 + and 3+ (G2+/3 + ) toxicities (e.g. diarrhea).

RESULTS

In total, 87 and 79 patients were included in the acute and late toxicity analyses, respectively. The most common acute G2 + toxicities were skin (dermatitis in 87 % [inguino-genital skin], 91 % [perianal skin]) and hematologic in 58 %. G2 + late anal toxicity (sphincter dysfunction), gastrointestinal toxicity, and skin toxicity were respectively experienced by 49 %, 38 %, and 44 % of patients. Statistically significant associations were observed between: G2 + acute diarrhea and small bowel V35; G2 + acute genitourinary toxicity and bladder D_0.5cc; G2 + inguino-genital skin toxicity and anterior skin V35; G2 + perianal skin toxicity and posterior skin V15; G2 + anemia and lower pelvis bone V45. D0.5 cc was significantly predictive of late toxicity (G2 + anal dysfunction, intestinal toxicity, and inguino-genital/perianal dermatitis). Maximum skin toxicity grade was significantly correlated with the requirement for a treatment break.

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant dose-volume parameters were identified and may be used to offer individualized risk prediction and to inform treatment planning. Additional validation of the results is required.

Patient-Reported GI Outcomes in Patients With Anal Cancer Receiving Modern Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

Among patients with anal cancer, chemoradiotherapy is often associated with toxicities that diminish quality of life. We describe the GI-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients with anal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy to improve patient-physician communication.

METHODS

We prospectively followed patients with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal who received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients completed the bowel subdomain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire before treatment and at 4 subsequent timepoints. We used the paired Wilcoxon test to compare EPIC scores at different times.

RESULTS

The study included 21 patients; median age was 57 years. Most patients (52%) had T2 and either N0 or N1 disease (81%). Most patients (91%) received chemotherapy with cisplatin-fluorouracil and either intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. Compared with the patients' median overall summary score at baseline (66), their median score at 1 week (82) was higher (P = .009), whereas their median score at 5 weeks (54) was lower (P = .025). The patients' median overall summary score at baseline and at 3 months did not differ (P = .919). Three months after radiotherapy, most patients reported minimal adverse effects compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

The GI-related PROs of patients with anal cancer tend to fluctuate during radiotherapy but return to baseline by 3 months, at which time most patients report few or no residual adverse effects. We provide a clear timeline of GI acute toxicity using sequential PRO measurements that will improve patient-physician communication regarding expectations for cancer treatment.

Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of data on incidence and mechanisms of long-term gastrointestinal consequences after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. Most of the adverse effects reported were based on traditional external beam radiotherapy whilst only short-term follow-ups have been available for intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and there is lack of knowledge about consequences of dose-escalation radiotherapy.

METHOD

A systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred and eighty-five titles (excluding duplicates) were identified through the search; 130 articles were included in this review. The overall incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity was reported to be 7-64.5%, with Grade 3 and above (classified as severe) up to 33.3%. The most commonly reported late toxicities were fecal incontinence (up to 44%), diarrhea (up to 26.7%), and ulceration (up to 22.6%). Diarrhea, fecal incontinence and buttock pain were associated with lower scores in radiotherapy specific quality of life scales (QLQ-CR29, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-CR38) compared to healthy controls. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy appears to reduce late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Late gastrointestinal toxicities are common with severe toxicity seen in one-third of the patients. These symptoms significantly impact on patients' quality of life. Prospective studies with control groups are needed to elucidate long-term toxicity.

The ongoing challenge of large anal cancers: prospective long term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy

Purpose

Patterns of failure and long term outcomes were prospectively evaluated following tumor factors-stratified radiation dose for anal/perianal cancer.

Methods

Between 2008-2013, patients with anal/perianal squamous cell carcinoma were accrued to an institutional REB-approved prospective study. All patients were treated with image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT). Radiation dose selection (27-36 Gy for elective target, and 45-63 Gy for gross target) was based on tumor clinico-pathologic features. Chemotherapy regimen was 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C (weeks 1&5). Local [LF], regional failure [RF], distant metastasis [DM], overall- [OS], disease-free [DFS], colostomy-free survival [CFS] and late toxicity were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 101 patients were evaluated; median follow-up: 56.5 months; 49.5% male; 34.7% T3/4-category, and 35.6% N+. Median radiation dose was 63 Gy. The most common acute grade ≥3 toxicities were skin (41.6%) and hematological (30.7%). Five-year OS, DFS, CFS, LF, RF, DM rates were 83.4%, 75.7%, 74.7, 13.9%, 4.6% and 5% respectively. Five-year LF for patients with T1-2 and T3-4 disease were 0% and 39.2% respectively. All LF (n = 14, after 63 Gy, in tumors ≥5 cm) were in the high dose volume except one marginal to the high dose volume. All RF (n = 4) were within elective dose volume except one within the high dose volume. On multivariable analysis, T3/4-category predicted for poor DFS, CFS and OS. The overall late grade ≥3 toxicity was 36.2% (mainly anal [20%]).

Conclusions

Individualized radiation dose selection using IG-IMRT resulted in good long term outcomes. However, central failures remain a problem for locally advanced tumors even with high dose radiation (63 Gy/7weeks).

Systematic review of the quality of life issues associated with anal cancer and its treatment with radiochemotherapy

PURPOSE

Radiochemotherapy is the standard of care for the treatment of anal carcinoma achieving good loco-regional control and sphincter preservation. This approach is however associated with acute and late toxicities including haematological, skin, bowel function and genito-urinary complications. This paper systematically reviews studies addressing the quality of life (QoL) implications of anal cancer and radiochemotherapy. The paper also evaluates how QoL is assessed in anal cancer.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications (1996-2014) reporting the effects on patients of anal cancer and radiochemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the 152 papers reporting treatment-related effects on patients, only 11 provided a formal assessment of QoL. In the absence of an anal cancer-specific measure, QoL was assessed using generic cancer instruments such as the core EORTC quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) or colorectal cancer tools such as the EORTC QLQ-CR29. Bowel function, particularly diarrhoea, and sexual problems were the most commonly reported QoL concerns. The review of QoL issues of anal cancer patients treated with radiochemotherapy is limited by the QoL assessment measures used. It is argued that certain treatment-related toxicities, for example skin-induced radiation problems, are overlooked or inadequately represented in existing measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasises the need to develop an anal cancer-specific QoL measure and to incorporate QoL as an outcome of future trials in anal cancer. The results of this review are informative to clinicians and patients in terms of treatment decision-making.

Quality of life outcomes in patients with anal cancer after combined radiochemotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess self-reported quality of life (QoL) experienced by anal cancer patients after radiochemotherapy, and to identify patient- and disease-related factors associated with QoL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 88 patients treated for anal cancer at our institution between 1990 and 2006 were identified from our database. Of these, 15 patients had died, and 4 were lost to follow-up. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (cancer-specific QoL) and the colorectal cancer module QLQ-CR38 (site-specific QoL); 52 responses were received. The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 5-137 months).

RESULTS

As for cancer-specific QoL, global health QoL score (mean 60.4) was similar to the general German population, whereas most of the function and symptom scale scores were considerably lower/higher in anal cancer patients. The most prominent mean score differences were observed in role functioning (-21.8 points), emotional functioning (-20.7 points), social functioning (-28.9 points), diarrhea (+34.6 points), and financial difficulties (+26.9 points; p < 0.001). As for site-specific QoL, the mean function scale scores ranged from 22.1 (sexual function) to 63.2 (body image), and the mean symptom scale scores from 14.7 (weight loss) to 69.0 (stoma-related problems, 4 patients) and 67.9 (male sexual dysfunction), respectively. Most of the QoL scores were not affected by late toxicity, patient- or disease-related factors. Fatigue (+18.2 points) emerged as the strongest predictor of impaired QoL.

CONCLUSION

The global health QoL of anal cancer patients is comparable with that of the general German population, but there are specific limitations, e.g., sexual dysfunction, urological/gastrointestinal complaints, financial difficulties, fatigue, and a reduction in emotional and social well-being.

The role of cytology (Pap tests) and human papillomavirus testing in anal cancer screening

OBJECTIVE

To assess anal oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) and anal cytology as screening tests for detecting high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN 2+), as this is an immediate anal cancer precursor.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of 401 HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). The endpoint was histologically confirmed AIN 2+ obtained by high-resolution anoscopy. Cytology and biopsy specimens were assigned random numbers and independently assessed by two pathologists.

METHODS

We did concomitant anal cytology, anal HPV testing and HRA with directed biopsies without knowing the results of each intervention. The main outcome measures were the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of anal cytology and oncogenic HPV for the detection of AIN 2+.

RESULTS

Cytology was abnormal in 67% of patients: high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 12%; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 43% and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 12%. Biopsies were abnormal in 68% of patients: AIN 2+, 25% and AIN 1, 43%. HPV was detected in 93% with multiple HPV types in 92% and oncogenic HPV types in 88%. Test performance characteristics for the detection of AIN 2+ using any abnormality on anal cytology were: sensitivity 84%, specificity 39%, negative predictive value 88% and positive predictive value 31%; using oncogenic HPV: sensitivity 100%, specificity 16%, negative predictive value 100% and positive predictive value 28%.

CONCLUSION

Anal cytology and HPV detection have high sensitivity but low specificity for detecting AIN 2+. HIV-positive men who have sex with men have a high prevalence of AIN 2+ and require high-resolution anoscopy for optimal detection of high-grade anal dysplasia.

Anal carcinoma in mid-Norway 1970-2000

The treatment of anal carcinoma changed from surgery to chemoradiotherapy 20-25 years ago. The aim of this observational study was to compare surgery with chemoradiotherapy with regard to side effects, local recurrence and survival during and after the implementation of a new treatment policy for anal carcinoma. The study includes all 111 patients with anal carcinoma diagnosed between 1970 and 2000 in mid-Norway. One hundred patients were treated with the intention to cure, and 11 patients received palliative treatment. Thirty-four patients were treated with surgery alone, and 57 patients with chemoradiotherapy. Among patients treated for cure, 17 patients (17%) developed local recurrence; ten patients (33%) in the surgically treated group and 4 (7%) in the chemoradiotherapy group (p = 0.15). Five year overall survival was 48% after surgery, compared to 78% after chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.004). Stage, age and treatment were all significant indicators of survival in uni- and multivariable analysis. Late side effects were moderate after combined therapy; only one patient preferred getting a stoma due to radiation damage of the anal sphincter. The change of strategy for anal cancer treatment from surgery to combined therapy has probably reduced local recurrence and improved survival. Side effects in this series of patients were minor after chemoradiotherapy compared to a permanent stoma after surgery.

Clinical outcome after treatment with a brachytherapy boost versus external beam boost for anal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome after definitive whole pelvis external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by brachytherapy (BT) boost after treatment break vs. external beam boost without break in the treatment of anal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty-one consecutive patients with invasive anal carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. Patients treated with an interstitial (192)Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) implant boost of 14Gy/7 fractions/3d given 3 weeks after completion of whole pelvis 45Gy EBRT were compared with those treated with external beam boost of 14.4Gy, started immediately after completion of whole pelvis 45Gy EBRT. Concomitant chemotherapy (CT) with mitomycin C was applied during whole pelvis EBRT depending on tumor stage. Pattern of care, local disease control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy with or without concomitant CT achieved clinical complete response in 93.4% of patients. In early stage tumors, (192)Ir-HDR BT boost with CT resulted in a 5-year LC and CSS of 100%. In all patients, BT boost did not result in improved LC, OS, and CSS compared with EBRT boost, despite stage and treatment bias favoring small tumors to be treated with BT. The 5-year and 10-year OS were 66% and 44% (BT boost) and 66% and 52% (EBRT boost), respectively. Subgroup analysis of Stages I and II disease revealed no significant improvement after BT boost compared with EBRT boost. Acute skin toxicity was less common in the BT boost group (whole cohort: p=0.14; Stages I-IIIa: p=0.05), but long-term morbidity and QOL were similar. No local necrosis was seen after BT boost and the 10-year sphincter preservation rate was 87% in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial (192)Ir-HDR implant boost with break and EBRT boost without break yield similar results. Acute skin toxicity is reduced with BT boost but long-term morbidity and QOL are identical. BT boost is most beneficial in early stage tumors but the advantage of BT seems to be limited due to its invasiveness, doctor dependence, and logistic circumstances.

Involved-field, low-dose chemoradiotherapy for early-stage anal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To report the results of patients with early-stage anal cancer treated using a low-dose, reduced-volume, involved-field chemoradiotherapy protocol.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 2000 and June 2006, 21 patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fractions within 3 weeks) and concurrent chemotherapy (bolus mitomycin-C 12 mg/m(2) on Day 1 to a maximum of 20 mg followed by infusion 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2)/24 h on Days 1-4). Of the 21 patients, 18 underwent small-volume, involved-field radiotherapy and 3 were treated with anteroposterior-posteroanterior parallel-opposed pelvic fields. Of the 21 patients, 17 had had lesions that were excised with close (<1 mm) or involved margins, 1 had had microinvasive disease on biopsy, and 3 had had macroscopic tumor <2 cm in diameter (T1). All were considered to have Stage N0 disease radiologically.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 42 months, only 1 patient (4.7%) had experienced local recurrence and has remained disease free after local excision. No distant recurrences or deaths occurred. Only 1 patient could not complete treatment (because of Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in only 2 patients (9.5%). No significant late toxicity was identified.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that for patients with anal carcinoma who have residual microscopic or very-small-volume disease, a policy of low-dose, reduced-volume, involved-field chemoradiotherapy produces excellent local control and disease-free survival, with low rates of acute and late toxicity.

Anus-preservation treatment for anal cancer: Retrospective analysis at a single institution

BACKGROUND

To evaluate anus-preservation treatment for anal cancer.

METHODS

Review of 42 patients (24 M/18 F; median age, 70 years; range, 13-95) with stage I-IIIB disease (squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC], 33; adenocarcinoma, 9) who received curative radiotherapy between 1991 and 2004. Eleven patients had prior surgical excision. Radiotherapy comprised lower-pelvis irradiation with boost to primary tumor (median lower-pelvis dose, 45 Gy; range, 17.2-59; median primary-site dose, 56 Gy; range, 40-72). Of 31 patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 25 received 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 32 months. The most common toxicity was dermatological; 25 patients (59%) developed moderate-to-severe wet desquamation. Radiotherapy was interrupted in 18 patients (43%). The complete response rate was 67% (SqCC, 23/33; adenocarcinoma, 5/9); of 12 patients who failed treatment, primary tumor was the recurrent site in seven (median failure time, 5 months): six patients underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection. Three-year overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 53% and 64%. Five-year functional anus-preservation rate was 64%. In multivariate analysis, OS was affected by performance status (P < 0.001), N stage (P = 0.009), and pathological type (P = 0.006). Only N stage (P = 0.001) affected DFS.

CONCLUSION

With careful monitoring of toxicity, non-surgical anus-preservation treatment with good tumor control is feasible.

External beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy boost in treatment of anal canal carcinoma

Purpose: Radiotherapy has been the standard treatment of anal canal carcinoma for the last three decades. However, there are still many open questions such as optimal radiation technique, adequate boost dose or best chemotherapy regimen. Beside cure and local control, other important goals are sphincter salvage and avoidance of a permanent colostomy, i.e. morbidity minimization. Material and methods: At the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, between March 1997 and May 2004, patients with anal canal carcinoma were treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost as primary treatment modality. Initially, external beam radiotherapy was applied with two opposed parallel fields and dose ranged from 40-50 Gy and after that patient continued the treatment with brachytherapy boost (intraluminal or interstitial) with doses ranged from 10-25 Gy. Total tumor dose in combined radiotherapy treatment ranged from 55-70 Gy. Results: Out of 21 patients, acute complications were registered in 15 patients (71.4%) and the most frequent was dermatitis. Complete response after radiotherapy was registered in 17 patients (81%). In the median follow up time of 42 months, five-year overall survival was 71% and disease free survival was 61%. Late sequelas were registered in 14 patients (66.7%), but they were low grade. Conclusions: Our study shows results using external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost as single modality treatment, but we need more randomized trial to improve better local control and minimize toxicity.

AIDS malignancies

Among individuals with HIV-infection, coinfection with oncogenic viruses including EBV, HHV-8, and HPV cause significant cancer-related morbidity and mortality. It is clear that these viruses interact with HIV in unique ways that predispose HIV-infected individuals to malignant diseases. In general, treatment directed specifically against these viruses does not appear to change the natural history of the malignant disease, and once the malignancy develops, if their health permits, HIV-infected patients should be treated using similar treatment protocols to HIV-negative patients. However, for the less frequent HIV-related malignancies, such as PEL, or MCD, optimal treatments are still emerging. For certain AIDS-defining malignancies, it is clear that the widespread access to HAART has significantly decreased the incidence, and improved outcomes. However, for other cancers, such as the HPV-related tumors, the role of HAART is much less clear. Further research into prevention and treatment of these oncogenic virally mediated AIDS-related malignancies is necessary.

[Epidermoid carcinomas of anal canal treated with radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and cisplatin)]

PURPOSE

To evaluate our results after radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy in terms of local control, survival and toxicity in patients with anal cancer.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Between November 1990 and January 2002, 60 patients (pts) were treated with radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy. The T-stage according to the 2001 UICC classification were: 2 T1, 26 T2, 25 T3, and 7 T4. There were 20 pts with nodal involvement at presentation. The treatment started with external beam RT (median dose: 45 Gy) and concomitant chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin during the first week and the fifth week of external beam RT (EBRT). After a rest period of 4 to 6 weeks, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by EBRT in 58 pts and by interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy in 2 pts. Mean follow-up were 78.5 months.

RESULTS

At the end of RT with concomitant chemotherapy local tumor clinical complete response rate was 83%. Out of 10 non responders or local progression, 5 (50%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection (APR). Out of 5 local tumor relapses, 3 were salvaged with APR. The overall local tumor control (LC) rate with or without salvage local treatment were 88%. LC rate with a good anal function scoring (score 0 and 1) was 70%. Among 43 pts who preserved their anus, 98% had a good anal function scoring. The 5-year disease-free survival was 75%. After multivariate analysis, 2 independent predicting factors significantly influenced the disease-free survival: HIV-positive pts (negative vs positive, P=0.032) and clinical tumor response after the first course of radiotherapy (<50% vs >or=50%, P=0.00032). Acute grade 2 or 3 toxicities were low: haematological toxicity in 4 pts and intestinal complication corresponding to diarrhea in 10 pts. Late severe complication was observed in 3 pts: 2 pts with painful necrosis of the anus requiring colostomy and 1 pt with grade 3 rectal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

We confirm the good results with RT and concomitant chemotherapy. The clinical tumor response after the first course of RT and concomitant chemotherapy is probably the most important predictive factor on the disease-free survival. For patients with T3 or T4 lesion and tumor regression <or=50% after the first course of radiation therapy, surgical non conservative treatment should be discussed.

Screening HIV-infected individuals for anal cancer precursor lesions: a systematic review

Individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are at increased risk for human papillomavirus-related squamous cell cancer of the anus. Screening HIV-infected patients for squamous cell cancer of the anus and human papillomavirus-related anal dysplasia may prevent excess morbidity and mortality. We have conducted a systematic review of the indirect evidence in the literature regarding the utility of anal Papanicolau (Pap) smear screening of HIV-infected individuals in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era. Although there are no published studies evaluating the efficacy of anal Pap smear screening for preventing squamous cell cancer of the anus or anal intraepithelial neoplasia, we reviewed data regarding the burden of disease, anal Pap smear sensitivity and specificity, the prevalence of anal dysplasia, and 1 cost effectiveness study. The available evidence demonstrates that HIV-infected individuals have an increased risk for squamous cell cancer of the anus and anal intraepithelial neoplasia. This review identifies important areas for further study before routine anal Pap smear screening can be recommended.

Effective treatment of anal cancer in the elderly with low-dose chemoradiotherapy

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is accepted as the standard initial treatment for squamous cell anal cancer. However, frail elderly patients cannot always tolerate full-dose CRT. This paper reports the results of a modified regimen for this group of patients. In all, 16 patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal or margin and performance status or co-morbidity precluding the use of full-dose CRT were included in this protocol. The median age was 81 (range 77-91). Patients received a dose of 30 Gy to the gross tumour volume plus 3 cm margin in all directions. Concurrent chemotherapy comprised 5-fluorouracil 600 mg m(-2) given over 24 h on days 1-4 of radiotherapy. The treatment was well tolerated. All 16 patients completed treatment as planned. Only one patient experienced any grade 3 toxicity (skin). The local control at a median follow-up of 16 months was 73% (13 out of 16). The overall survival was 69% and disease-specific survival 86%. This is a well-tolerated regimen for elderly/poor performance patients with anal cancer, which can achieve high rates of local control and survival. Longer follow-up will determine whether these encouraging results are maintained.

Quality of life after non-surgical treatment of anal carcinoma: a case control study of long-term survivors

AIMS

To evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of a cohort of patients after non-surgical treatment of anal carcinoma with chemotherapy and radiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated for anal carcinoma at the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1990 and 2001 were identified from audit data. A total of 92 suitable patients were found among these. They were approached by letter and encouraged to complete questionnaires regarding their QOL. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38 instruments were used to evaluate general QOL, and more disease and site-related aspects. Fifty responses were received and were compared with those of a sample of matched local volunteer control participants who had not received any treatment to their abdomen or pelvis. Responses were scored and the results analysed with the SPSS statistical package.

RESULTS

Significant differences were detected in global QOL and in more specific areas of both general and site/disease-specific nature. Identified general areas involved physical, social, and role functions, and symptoms of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dyspnoea, appetite loss, diarrhoea, constipation, and financial problems, with cancer/site-related micturition, gastrointestinal and chemotherapy side-effect symptoms, and male and female sexual problems.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that after curative treatment for anal carcinoma with chemoradiation that has spared the patient of surgery, issues affecting QOL can present in a significant proportion of patients.

Cancer of the anal canal

Anal cancer is an uncommon tumour that represents 4% of all cancers of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Its pathogenesis and treatment have undergone substantial reassessment over the past two decades, and this is likely to continue. Anal cancer can be cured by synchronous chemoradiotherapy, a treatment that both enables anal continence to be retained and reserves abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and anal canal (with formation of a permanent colostomy) for recurrent or residual disease after primary chemoradiotherapy. Overall, survival from anal cancer is now around 70-80% at 5 years. Future challenges will be influenced by an increasing incidence due to human papillomavirus and HIV infection, more accurate characterisation and treatment of early (in situ) disease, and optimisation of chemoradiation regimens.

[Epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal treated with definitive radiation therapy in a series of 305 patients]

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors and treatment toxicity in a serie of epidermoid cancers of the anal canal without evident metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1972 and January 1997, 305 patients (pts) were treated with curative-intent radiation therapy (RT). The T-stages according to the 1987 UICC classification were: 26 T1, 141 T2, 104 T3, and 34 T4. There were 49 pts with nodal involvement at presentation. Pretreatment anal function scoring according to our in-house system was: 22 scored 0, 182 scored 1, 74 scored 2, 7 scored 3, 11 scored 4, and 9 not available pts. The treatment started with external beam RT (EBRT) in 303 pts (median dose: 45 Gy). After a rest period of 4 to 6 weeks, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by EBRT in 279 pts and by interstitial 192Ir brachytherapy (Bcy) in 17 pts. Seven pts received only one course of EBRT (mean dose: 49.5 Gy) and 2 pts were treated with interstitial 192Ir Bcy alone (55 and 60 Gy, respectively). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluoro-uracil and either mitomycin C or cisplatin) was delivered to 19 pts. Mean follow-up was 103 months.

RESULTS

At the end of RT local tumor clinical complete response (cCR) rate was 80%. Out of 61 non responders or local progressive tumors 27 (44%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection (APR). The rate of local tumor relapse (LR) was 12%. Out of 37 LTR, 20 (54%) were salvaged with APR and one with interstitial 192Ir Bcy. The orevall local tumor control (LC) rate with or without salvage local treatment was 84%. LC rate with a good anal function scoring (score 0 and 1) was 56.5%. Among 181/186 available pts who preserved their anus, 94% had a good anal function scoring. For a subgroup of 15 pts with length tumor <2 cm-N0, the LC rate after the end of RT was 100%, the LC rate with or without local salvage treatment was 100%, and among 13 available pts who preserved their anus, the anal function scoring was good in 12 pts (92%). The 10-years disease-free survival was 74%. After multivariate analysis, 3 independent predicting factors significantly influenced the disease-free survival: gap duration between 2 courses of RT (>38 days vs < or =38 days, P =0.0025), pretreatment anal function scoring (0 vs 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs 4, P =4.4 10(-6)), and cCR after the end of RT (no complete response vs complete response, P =2.5 10(-14)).

CONCLUSION

We confirm excellent results with RT in T1 and T2 lesions. However, chemoradiotherapy should be prefered to improve survival free of colostomy with a good anal sphincter function for tumors more than or equal to 2 cm in length and locally advanced tumors.

Results of definitive irradiation in a series of 305 epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal

PURPOSE

To evaluate our data concerning the prognostic factors for locoregional control, survival, late complications, and sphincter conservation in a series of epidermoid cancers of the anal canal without clinical evidence of metastasis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 1972 and January 1997, 305 patients were treated with curative-intent radiotherapy (RT). The T stage according to the 1987 International Union Against Cancer classification was T1 in 26, T2 in 141, T3 in 104, and T4 in 34. Forty-nine patients had nodal involvement at presentation. The pretreatment anal function score, according to our in-house system, was 0 for 22 patients, 1 for 182, 2 for 74, 3 for 7, and 4 for 11 patients; for 9 patients, scores were unavailable. The treatment started with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 303 patients (median dose 45 Gy). After a rest period of 4-6 weeks, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by EBRT in 279 patients and by interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy in 17 patients. Seven patients received only one course of EBRT (mean dose 49.5 Gy), and 2 patients were treated with interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy alone (55 Gy and 60 Gy). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and either mitomycin C or cisplatin) was delivered to 19 patients. The mean follow-up was 103 months (median 84).

RESULTS

At the end of RT, the local tumor clinical complete response rate was 96% for T1, 87% for T2, 79% for T3, and 44% for T4. Of the 61 locally progressive tumors, 27 (44%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection. The rate of local tumor relapse was 12%. Among 37 local tumor relapses, 20 (54%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection and one with interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy. The overall local control rate (with or without salvage local therapy) was 84%. The local control rate with good anal function (score 0 or 1) was 56.5%. Of 181 available patients with their anus preserved, 94% had good anal function. For a subgroup of 15 patients with a tumor length of <2 cm and without nodal involvement, the clinical complete response rate after RT completion was 100%, the local control rate with or without local salvage treatment was 100%, and among 13 available patients with their anus preserved, the anal function score was good in 12 patients (92%). The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 74%. After multivariate analysis, three independent predictive factors significantly influenced disease-free survival: the interval between the two courses of RT (>38 days vs. < or =38 days, p = 0.0025), pretreatment anal function score (0 vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4, p = 4.4.10(-6)), and clinical complete response after RT completion (no complete response vs. complete response, p = 2.5.10(-14)).

CONCLUSION

We confirm the excellent results with RT in T1 and T2 lesions. However, to improve survival without colostomy with good anal sphincter function, chemoradiotherapy should be preferred for tumors > or =2 cm in length and for locally advanced tumors.

Contribution of conformal therapy in the treatment of anal canal carcinoma with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy: results of a phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of delivering conformal radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemotherapy without a mandatory break in patients with anal canal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients with T2-T4 tumors were treated with a combination of 54 Gy in 30 fractions and two cycles of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Dose-volume histograms were obtained for bone marrow, small bowel, and skin to compare the conventional technique using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group standard with our conformal technique.

RESULTS

The mean dose ratio of the conventional compared with the conformal technique for bone marrow, small bowel, and skin was, respectively, 2.1-2.7, 3.0, and 2.0, in favor of the conformal technique. All patients completed their treatment without a treatment break. An incidence of Grade 3 toxicity for bone marrow, bowel, and skin of 13.3%, 3.3%, and 20%, respectively, was observed. With a median follow-up of 33 months, a 4-year local recurrence-free survival rate of 91% was observed.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study have shown that conformal RT leads to a well-tolerated treatment. The treatment time is shortened to 6 weeks. A significant decrease in the acute toxicity rate suggests that by decreasing the "volume factor," conformal RT improves the therapeutic index in patients treated with combined chemotherapy and RT.

[Carcinoma of the anal canal--results of radical radiotherapy]

From February 1995 to August 2001, 34 pts with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (stage T2-35.3%, stage T3-44.1%, stage T4-20.6%, stage N1-29.4%) were treated prospectively by definitive radiotherapy only, delivered with megavoltage linear accelerator, combined with intracavitary brachytherapy in some patients, at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia. Total tumor dose was range 55-75 Gy. Median follow-up time was 24.7 mounts (range 6-66 mounts). Overall survival and disease free survival at 5 years were 65.44% and 68.44%. Local control was 82.3% (28/34 pts). Eight pts had local or distant failure. Early and late complication rates were acceptable. In majority of patients the anal sphincter function was preserved.

Carcinoma of the anus: strategies in management

The management of anal cancer underwent an interesting transformation over the last two decades. Prior to this period, the standard definitive treatment for carcinoma of the anal canal was abdominal-perineal resection, which necessitated a permanent colostomy. The organ preservation concept appeared following the discovery of a high complete response rate from preoperative combined chemoradiation prior to abdominal-perineal resection. The organ preservation method of treatment rapidly gained popularity and ultimately saved a large number of patients from undergoing abdominal-perineal resection and colostomy. Chemoradiation treatment itself subsequently went through an evolutionary process. Several studies have sought to define the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen as well as radiation treatment dose and fractionation. Ongoing studies attempt to define an optimal treatment regimen that yields a higher cure rate while minimizing toxicity. We review the etiology, epidemiology, and treatment regimens for anal cancer.

Experience with split-course external beam irradiation +/- chemotherapy and integrated Ir-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of primary carcinomas of the anal canal

PURPOSE

The effect of the treatment of anal cancer by performing a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost during a short split between the external beam radiotherapy series (EBR) +/- chemotherapy was investigated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-nine patients with anal canal cancers, stages T1-T4 N0-2 M0, were treated with split-course EBR (50-50.4 Gy) and a Iridium 192 ((192)Ir-) HDR boost (6 Gy) performed during the 1-2-week split. Patients who failed to achieve a complete tumor response received additional brachytherapy. Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C was offered to patients with tumors > 3 cm and employed concomitantly on days 1-5 and day 1, respectively, of each EBR series.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 3 to 140 months (median 31). Median treatment duration was 56 days. The 3-year (5-year) actuarial rates of locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 81% (76%) and 80% (76%), respectively. The crude rate of anal preservation was 77% overall, and 97% in patients in whom LRC was achieved. Uncompromised anal function was recorded in 93% of these patients. The actuarial 3-year (5-year) rate of colostomy-free survival (CFS) was 78% (73%). There was a statistically significant difference in LRC and DSS according to stage, tumor size, and nodal status. Complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 7.6% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The integration of the HDR boost in a split-course EBR regimen +/- chemotherapy resulted in excellent sphincter function without an increase of severe complications and with rates of LRC, DSS, and CFS, which compare favorably with those reported in the literature.

Anal carcinoma: histology, staging, epidemiology, treatment

Our understanding of the pathogenesis and management of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal has undergone profound change over the last 30 years. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that infection with human papillomavirus is most likely responsible for the majority of cases. Primary treatment with concomitant chemotherapy and radiation cures the majority of patients without the need for an abdominoperineal resection. Recent series have demonstrated that approximately one half of patients with a local recurrence after chemoradiation will be cured with salvage surgery. The incorporation of cisplatin into the primary chemoradiation treatment of patients with carcinoma of the anal canal is the focus of current studies.

Carcinoma of the anal canal

Despite the rarity of carcinoma of the anal canal, remarkable progress has been achieved during the past 30 years in understanding its pathogenesis and improving treatment. Largely because of the rigorous collection of data and the treatment of patients in clinical trials, it is now widely accepted that the majority of cases are caused by human papillomavirus and can be cured by combination therapy. Concomitant treatment with external-beam radiation therapy and chemotherapy with fluorouracil and mitomycin represents the standard approach to combination treatment. Appropriate cytologic screening of high risk populations and the integration of platinum compounds into treatment regimens will most likely reduce mortality from this disorder even further.

[Chemoradiotherapy in treatment of cancer of the anal canal]

In the treatment of anal canal carcinoma, since the work of Nigro, the 5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C regimen is considered standard when applied concomitantly with radiotherapy. Surgery is used mainly to salvage the failures after irradiation. Two randomized European trials (EORTC, UKCCCR) have shown that the 5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C combination improves local control but not overall survival. The RTOG-ECOG trial has shown that mitomycin C improves local control when compared to 5-fluorouracil alone. This chemotherapy is responsible for a toxic death in 2% of cases. The 5-fluorouracil-cisplatin regimen will possibly represent an alternative to the 5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C. Ongoing trials will help to answer this question.

Time-dose considerations in the treatment of anal cancer

PURPOSE

To analyze the impact of patient and treatment parameters in concurrent chemoradiation treatment for anal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective review of 50 MO anal cancer patients treated from 1984-1994. Most patients received concurrent 5-FU, mitomycin, and radiation. Local control and disease-free/overall survival were determined and analyzed according to patient and treatment parameters.

RESULTS

With 43 month median follow-up, projected overall survival is 66% at 5 and 8 years. Disease-free survival is 67% at 5 years and 59% at 8 years. Local control is 70% at 5 and 8 years. Doses of > or =54 Gy are associated with improved 5-year survival (84 vs. 47%, p = 0.02), disease-free survival (74 v. 56%, p = 0.09), and local control (77 vs. 61%, p = 0.04). Although local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were improved in patients whose overall treatment time was <40 days, this was not statistically significant. Outcome in the four patients with pretreatment hemoglobin (Hgb) <10 appeared worse with 3-year overall survival 50 vs. 68% (p = 0.07), disease-free survival 0 vs. 67% (p = 0.11), and local control 0 vs. 74% (p = 0.05). Projected 5-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and local control in 4 HIV(+) patients is 0, 75, and 75%. Multivariate analysis reveals that dose (p = 0.02) and Hgb (p = 0.05) independently affect local control, dose (p = 0.02) affects disease-free survival, and dose (p = 0.01), Hgb (p = 0.03), T-stage (p = 0.03), and HIV-status (0.07) independently influence overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Radiation doses of > or =54 Gy are associated with significantly improved survival and local control in anal cancer patients treated with chemoradiation. Overall treatment times of less than 40 days are associated with a trend towards improved outcome, but this is not significant. Pretreatment hemoglobin <10 is associated with worse treatment outcome. Survival of HIV (+) patient is poor, but the majority of such patients in this series died of intercurrent disease with their anal carcinomas controlled by chemoradiation.