Quality assurance for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery

Comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery platform characterization: A novel end-to-end approach with anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely employed strategy for intracranial metastases, utilizing linear accelerators and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Ensuring precise linear accelerator performance is crucial, given the small planning target volume (PTV) margins. Rapid dose falloff is vital to minimize brain radiation necrosis. Despite advances in SRS planning, tools for end-to-end testing of SRS treatments are lacking, hindering confidence in the procedure.

PURPOSE

This study introduces a novel end-to-end three-dimensional (3D) anthropomorphic dosimetry system for characterization of a radiosurgery platform, aiming to measure planning metrics, dose gradient index (DGI), brain volumes receiving at least 10 and 12 Gy (V10, V12), as well as assess delivery uncertainties in multitarget treatments. The study also compares metrics from benchmark plans to enhance understanding and confidence in SRS treatments.

METHODS

The developed anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry system includes a modified Stereotactic End-to-End Verification (STEEV) phantom with a customized insert integrating 3D dosimeters and a fiber optic CT scanner. Labview and MATLAB programs handle optical scanning, image preprocessing, and dosimetric analysis. SlicerRT is used for 3D dose visualization and analysis. A film stack insert was used to validate the 3D dosimeter measurements at specific slices. Benchmark plans were developed and measured to investigate off-axis errors, dose spillage, small field dosimetry, and multi-target delivery.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the developed 3D dosimetry system was rigorously assessed using radiochromic films. Two two-dimensional (2D) dose planes, extracted from the 3D dose distribution, were compared with film measurements, resulting in high passing rates of 99.9% and 99.6% in gamma tests. The mean relative dose difference between film and 3D dosimeter measurements was -1%, with a standard deviation of 2.2%, well within dosimeter uncertainties. In the first module, evaluating single-isocenter multitarget treatments, a 1.5 mm dose distribution shift was observed when targets were 7 cm off-axis. This shift was attributed to machine mechanical errors and image-guided system uncertainties, indicating potential limitations in conventional gamma tests. The second module investigated discrepancies in intermediate-to-low dose spillage, revealing higher measured doses in the connecting region between closely positioned targets. This discrepancy was linked to uncertainties in treatment planning system (TPS) modeling of out-of-field dose and multileaf collimator (MLC) characteristics, resulting in lower DGI values and higher V10 and V12 values compared to TPS calculations. In the third module, irradiating multiple targets showed consistent V10 and V12 values within 1 cm3 agreement with dose calculations. However, lower DGI values from measurements compared to calculations suggested intricacies in the treatment process. Conducting vital end-to-end testing demonstrated the anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry system's capacity to assess overall treatment uncertainty, offering a valuable tool for enhancing treatment accuracy in radiosurgery platforms.

CONCLUSIONS

The study introduces a novel anthropomorphic 3D dosimetry system for end-to-end testing of a radiosurgery platform. The system effectively measures plan quality metrics, captures mechanical errors, and visualizes dose discrepancies in 3D space. The comprehensive evaluation capability enhances confidence in the commissioning and verification process, ensuring patient safety. The system is recommended for commissioning new radiosurgery platforms and remote auditing of existing programs.

Long-term geometric quality assurance of radiation focal point and cone-beam computed tomography for Gamma Knife radiosurgery system

To investigate the geometric accuracy of the radiation focal point (RFP) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) over long-term periods for the ICON Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery system. This phantom study utilized the ICON quality assurance tool plus, and the phantom was manually set on the patient position system before the implementation of treatment for patients. The deviation of the RFP position from the unit center point (UCP) and the positions of the four ball bearings (BBs) in the CBCT from the reference position were automatically analyzed. During 544 days, a total of 269 analyses were performed on different days. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the deviation between measured RFP and UCP was 0.01 ± 0.03, 0.01 ± 0.03, and -0.01 ± 0.01 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. The deviations with offset values after the cobalt-60 source replacement (0.00 ± 0.03, -0.01 ± 0.01, and -0.01 ± 0.01 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively) were significantly (p = 0.001) smaller than those before the replacement (0.02 ± 0.03, 0.02 ± 0.01, and -0.02 ± 0.01 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively). The overall mean ± SD of four BBs was -0.03 ± 0.03, -0.01 ± 0.05, and 0.01 ± 0.03 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. Geometric positional accuracy was ensured to be within 0.1 mm on most days over a long-term period of more than 500 days.

Validation of Gamma Knife Perfexion Dose Profile Distribution by a Modified Variable Ellipsoid Modeling Technique

OBJECTIVE

High precision and accuracy are expected in gamma knife radiosurgery treatment. Because of the requirement of clinically applying complex radiation and dose gradients together with a rapid radiation decline, a dedicated quality assurance program is required to maintain the radiation dosimetry and geometric accuracy and to reduce all associated risk factors. This study investigates the validity of Leksell Gamma plan (LGP)10.1.1 system of 5th generation Gamma Knife Perfexion as modified variable ellipsoid modeling technique (VEMT) method.

METHODS

To verify LGP10.1.1 system, we compare the treatment plan program system of the Gamma Knife Perfexion, that is, the LGP, with the calculated value of the proposed modified VEMT program. To verify a modified VEMT method, we compare the distributions of the dose of Gamma Knife Perfexion measured by Gafchromic EBT3 and EBT-XD films. For verification, the center of an 80 mm radius solid water phantom is placed in the center of all sectors positioned at 16 mm, 4 mm and 8 mm; that is, the dose distribution is similar to the method used in the x, y, and z directions by the VEMT. The dose distribution in the axial direction is compared and analyzed based on Full-Width-of-Half-Maximum (FWHM) evaluation.

RESULTS

The dose profile distribution was evaluated by FWHM, and it showed an average difference of 0.104 mm for the LGP value and 0.130 mm for the EBT-XD film.

CONCLUSION

The modified VEMT yielded consistent results in the two processes. The use of the modified VEMT as a verification tool can enable the system to stably test and operate the Gamma Knife Perfexion treatment planning system.

Filmless quality assurance of a Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™

PURPOSE

The annual quality assurance (QA) of Leksell Gamma Knife^® (LGK) systems are typically performed using films. Film is a good candidate for small field dosimetry due to its high spatial resolution and availability. However, there are multiple challenges with using film; film does not provide real-time measurement and requires batch-specific calibration. Our findings show that active detector-based QA can simplify the procedure and save time without loss of accuracy.

METHODS

Annual QA tests for a LGK Icon™ system were performed using both film-based and filmless techniques. Output calibration, relative output factors (ROF), radiation profiles, sector uniformity/source counting, and verification of the unit center point (UCP) and radiation focal point (RFP) coincidence tests were performed. Radiochromic films, two ionization chambers, and a synthetic diamond detector were used for the measurements. Results were compared and verified with the treatment planning system (TPS).

RESULTS

The measured dose rate of the LGK Icon was within 0.4% of the TPS value set at the time of commissioning using an ionization chamber. ROF for the 8 and 4-mm collimators were found to be 0.3% and 1.8% different from TPS values using the MicroDiamond detector and 2.6% and 1.9% different for film, respectively. Excellent agreement was found between TPS and measured dose profiles using the MicroDiamond detector which was within 1%/1 mm vs 2%/1 mm for film. Sector uniformity was found to be within 1% for all eight sectors measured using an ionization chamber. Verification of UCP and RFP coincidence using the MicroDiamond detector and pinprick film test was within 0.3 mm at isocenter for both.

CONCLUSION

The annual QA of a LGK Icon was successfully performed by employing filmless techniques. Comparable results were obtained using radiochromic films. Utilizing active detectors instead of films simplifies the QA process and saves time without loss of accuracy.

Evaluation of a new secondary dose calculation software for Gamma Knife radiosurgery

Current available secondary dose calculation software for Gamma Knife radiosurgery falls short in situations where the target is shallow in depth or when the patient is positioned with a gamma angle other than 90°. In this work, we evaluate a new secondary calculation software which utilizes an innovative method to handle nonstandard gamma angles and image thresholding to render the skull for dose calculation. 800 treatment targets previously treated with our GammaKnife Icon system were imported from our treatment planning system (GammaPlan 11.0.3) and a secondary dose calculation was conducted. The agreement between the new calculations and the TPS were recorded and compared to the original secondary dose calculation agreement with the TPS using a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Further comparisons using a Mann‐Whitney test were made for targets treated at a 90° gamma angle against those treated with either a 70 or 110 gamma angle for both the new and commercial secondary dose calculation systems. Correlations between dose deviations from the treatment planning system against average target depth were evaluated using a Kendall’s Tau correlation test for both programs. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test indicated a significant difference in the agreement between the two secondary calculations and the TPS, with a P‐value < 0.0001. With respect to patients treated at nonstandard gamma angles, the new software was largely independent of patient setup, while the commercial software showed a significant dependence (P‐value < 0.0001). The new secondary dose calculation software showed a moderate correlation with calculation depth, while the commercial software showed a weak correlation (Tau = −.322 and Tau = −.217 respectively). Overall, the new secondary software has better agreement with the TPS than the commercially available secondary calculation software over a range of diverse treatment geometries.

Development of a PMMA phantom as a practical alternative for quality control of gamma knife® dosimetry

BACKGROUND

To measure the absorbed dose rate to water and penumbra of a Gamma Knife® (GK) using a polymethyl metacrylate (PMMA) phantom.

METHODS

A multi-purpose PMMA phantom was developed to measure the absorbed dose rate to water and the dose distribution of a GK. The phantom consists of a hemispherical outer phantom, one exchangeable cylindrical chamber-hosting inner phantom, and two film-hosting inner phantoms. The radius of the phantom was determined considering the electron density of the PMMA such that it corresponds to 8 g/cm2 water depth, which is the reference depth of the absorbed dose measurement of GK. The absorbed dose rate to water was measured with a PTW TN31010 chamber, and the dose distributions were measured with radiochromic films at the calibration center of a patient positioning system of a GK Perfexion. A spherical water-filled phantom with the same water equivalent depth was constructed as a reference phantom. The dose rate to water and dose distributions at the center of a circular field delimited by a 16-mm collimator were measured with the PMMA phantom at six GK Perfexion sites.

RESULTS

The radius of the PMMA phantom was determined to be 6.93 cm, corresponding to equivalent water depth of 8 g/cm2. The absorbed dose rate to water was measured with the PMMA phantom, the spherical water-filled phantom and a commercial solid water phantom. The measured dose rate with the PMMA phantom was 1.2% and 1.8% higher than those measured with the spherical water-filled phantom and the solid water phantom, respectively. These differences can be explained by the scattered photon contribution of PMMA off incoming 60Co gamma-rays to the dose rate. The average full width half maximum and penumbra values measured with the PMMA phantom showed reasonable agreement with two calculated values, one at the center of the PMMA phantom (LGP6.93) and other at the center of a water sphere with a radius of 8 cm (LGP8.0) given by Leksell Gamma Plan using the TMR10 algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

A PMMA phantom constructed in this study to measure the absorbed dose rates to water and dose distributions of a GK represents an acceptable and practical alternative for GK dosimetry considering its cost-effectiveness and ease of handling.

Assessment of the accuracy and stability of frameless gamma knife radiosurgery

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and stability of frameless gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). The accuracies of the radiation isocenter and patient couch movement were evaluated by film dosimetry with a half-year cycle. Radiation isocenter assessment with a diode detector and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image accuracy tests were performed daily with a vendor-provided tool for one and a half years after installation. CBCT image quality was examined twice a month with a phantom. The accuracy of image coregistration using CBCT images was studied using magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images of another phantom. The overall positional accuracy was measured in whole procedure tests using film dosimetry with an anthropomorphic phantom. The positional errors of the radiation isocenter at the center and at an extreme position were both less than 0.1 mm. The three-dimensional deviation of the CBCT coordinate system was stable for one and a half years (mean 0.04 ± 0.02 mm). Image coregistration revealed a difference of 0.2 ± 0.1 mm between CT and CBCT images and a deviation of 0.4 ± 0.2 mm between MR and CBCT images. The whole procedure test of the positional accuracy of the mask-based irradiation revealed an accuracy of 0.5 ± 0.6 mm. The radiation isocenter accuracy, patient couch movement accuracy, and Gamma Knife Icon CBCT accuracy were all approximately 0.1 mm and were stable for one and a half years. The coordinate system assigned to MR images through coregistration was more accurate than the system defined by fiducial markers. Possible patient motion during irradiation should be considered when evaluating the overall accuracy of frameless GKRS.

An effective calibration technique for radiochromic films using a single-shot dose distribution in Gamma Knife(®)

PURPOSE

A method of calibrating radiochromic films for Gamma Knife(®) (GK) dosimetry was developed. The applicability and accuracy of the new method were examined.

METHODS

The dose distribution for a sixteen millimeter single-shot from a GK was built using a reference film that was calibrated using the conventional multi-film calibration (MFC) method. Another film, the test film, from a different set of films was irradiated under the same conditions as the reference film. The calibration curve for the second set of films was obtained by assigning the dose distribution of the reference film to the optical density of the test film, point by point. To assess the accuracy of this single-film calibration (SFC) method, differences between gamma index pass rates (GIPRs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The SFC curves were successfully obtained with estimated errors of 1.46%. GIPRs obtained with the SFC method for films irradiated using a single-shot showed differences less than one percentage point when dose difference criterion (ΔD) was 2% and the distance to agreement criterion (Δd) was 1 mm. The GIPRs of the SFC method when the films were irradiated following a virtual target treatment plan were consistent with the GIPRs of the MFC method, with differences of less than 0.2 percentage points for ΔD = 1% and Δd = 1 mm.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of the SFC method is comparable to that of conventional multi-film calibration method for GK film dosimetry.

Design and Testing of Indigenous Cost Effective Three Dimensional Radiation Field Analyser (3D RFA)

The aim of the study is to design and validate an indigenous three dimensional Radiation Field Analyser (3D RFA). The feed system made for X, Y and Z axis movements is of lead screw with deep ball bearing mechanism made up of stain less steel driven by stepper motors with accuracy less than 0.5 mm. The telescopic column lifting unit was designed using linear actuation technology for lifting the water phantom. The acrylic phantom with dimensions of 800 × 750 × 570 mm was made with thickness of 15 mm. The software was developed in visual basic programming language, classified into two types, viz. beam analyzer software and beam acquisition software. The premeasurement checks were performed as per TG 106 recommendations. The physical parameters of photon PDDs such as Dmax, D10, D20and Quality Index (QI), and the electron PDDs such as R50, Rp, E0, Epoand X-ray contamination values can be obtained instantaneously by using the developed RFA system. Also the results for profile data such as field size, central axis deviation, penumbra, flatness and symmetry calculated according to various protocols can be obtained for both photon and electron beams. The result of PDDs for photon beams were compared with BJR25 supplement values and the profile data were compared with TG 40 recommendation. The results were in agreement with standard protocols.

American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Practice Guideline for the Performance of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)

American College of Radiology and American Society for Radiation Oncology Practice Guideline for the Performance of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). SRS is a safe and efficacious treatment option of a variety of benign and malignant disorders involving intracranial structures and selected extracranial lesions. SRS involves a high dose of ionizing radiation with a high degree of precision and spatial accuracy. A quality SRS program requires a multidisciplinary team involved in the patient management. Organization, appropriate staffing, and careful adherence to detail and to established SRS standards is important to ensure operational efficiency and to improve the likelihood of procedural success. A collaborative effort of the American College of Radiology and American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology has produced a practice guideline for SRS. The guideline defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all the involved personnel, including the radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, and qualified medical physicist. Quality assurance is essential for safe and accurate delivery of treatment with SRS. Quality assurance issues for the treatment unit, stereotactic accessories, medical imaging, and treatment-planning system are presented and discussed. Adherence to these practice guidelines can be part of ensuring quality and patient safety in a successful SRS program.

[Ballistic quality assurance]

This review describes the ballistic quality assurance for stereotactic intracranial irradiation treatments delivered with Gamma Knife® either dedicated or adapted medical linear accelerators. Specific and periodic controls should be performed in order to check the mechanical stability for both irradiation and collimation systems. If this step remains under the responsibility of the medical physicist, it should be done in agreement with the manufacturer's technical support. At this time, there are no recent published guidelines. With technological developments, both frequency and accuracy should be assessed in each institution according to the treatment mode: single versus hypofractionnated dose, circular collimator versus micro-multileaf collimators. In addition, "end-to-end" techniques are mandatory to find the origin of potential discrepancies and to estimate the global ballistic accuracy of the delivered treatment. Indeed, they include frames, non-invasive immobilization devices, localizers, multimodal imaging for delineation and in-room positioning imaging systems. The final precision that could be reasonably achieved is more or less 1mm.

Determination of the absorbed dose rate to water for the 18-mm helmet of a gamma knife

PURPOSE

To measure the absorbed dose rate to water of (60)Co gamma rays of a Gamma Knife Model C using water-filled phantoms (WFP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Spherical WFP with an equivalent water depth of 5, 7, 8, and 9 cm were constructed. The dose rates at the center of an 18-mm helmet were measured in an 8-cm WFP (WFP-3) and two plastic phantoms. Two independent measurement systems were used: one was calibrated to an air kerma (Set I) and the other was calibrated to the absorbed dose to water (Set II). The dose rates of WFP-3 and the plastic phantoms were converted to dose rates for an 8-cm water depth using the attenuation coefficient and the equivalent water depths.

RESULTS

The dose rate measured at the center of WFP-3 using Set II was 2.2% and 1.0% higher than dose rates measured at the center of the two plastic phantoms. The measured effective attenuation coefficient of Gamma Knife photon beam in WFPs was 0.0621 cm(-1). After attenuation correction, the difference between the dose rate at an 8-cm water depth measured in WFP-3 and dose rates in the plastic phantoms was smaller than the uncertainty of the measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic errors related to the characteristics of the phantom materials in the dose rate measurement of a Gamma Knife need to be corrected for. Correction of the dose rate using an equivalent water depth and attenuation provided results that were more consistent.

The variable ellipsoid modeling technique as a verification method for the treatment planning system of gamma knife radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

The secondary verification of Leksell Gamma Knife treatment planning system (LGP) (which is the primary verification system) is extremely important in order to minimize the risk of treatment errors. Although prior methods have been developed to verify maximum dose and treatment time, none have studied maximum dose coordinates and treatment volume.

METHODS

We simulated the skull shape as an ellipsoid with its center at the junction between the mammillary bodies and the brain stem. The radiation depths of the beamlets emitted from 201 collimators were calculated based on the relationship between this ellipsoid and a single beamlet expressed as a straight line. A computer program was coded to execute the algorithm. A database system was adopted to log the doses for 31x31x31 or 29,791 matrix points allowing for future queries to be made of the matrix of interest.

RESULTS

When we compared the parameters in seven patients, all parameters showed good correlation. The number of matrix points with a dose higher than 30% of the maximal dose was within +/- 2% of LGP. The 50% dose volume, which is generally the target volume, differs maximally by 4.2%. The difference of the maximal dose ranges from 0.7% to 7%.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, the variable ellipsoid modeling technique or variable ellipsoid modeling technique (VEMT) can be a useful and independent tool to verify the important parameters of LGP and make up for LGP.

Radiosurgery with the world's first fully robotized Leksell Gamma Knife PerfeXion in clinical use: a 200-patient prospective, randomized, controlled comparison with the Gamma Knife 4C

OBJECTIVE

The world's first Leksell Gamma Knife PerfeXion (Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, Sweden) for radiosurgery of the head and neck became operational at Timone University Hospital in Marseille on July 10, 2006. To allow strict evaluation of the capabilities, advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of this new technology, patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized trial.

METHODS

In 66 working days, between July 10 and December 20, 2006, 363 patients were treated by gamma knife surgery at Timone University Hospital, Marseille. Of these patients, 200 were eligible for the comparative prospective study (inclusion criteria were informed consent obtained, tumor or vascular indication, and no previous radiosurgery or radiotherapy). In accordance with the blinded randomization process, 100 patients were treated with the Leksell Gamma Knife 4C (Elekta Instrument AB) and Gamma Knife 100 (Elekta Instrument AB) with the Leksell Gamma Knife PerfeXion. Dose planning parameters, dosimetry measurements on the patient's body, workflow, patient comfort, quality assurance procedure, and a series of other treatment-related parameters were systematically and prospectively evaluated in both arms of the trial.

RESULTS

No technical failure of the treatment procedure was encountered. The new dose-planning system led to the use of composite shots in 39.4% of the patients. The median number of different collimator sizes used was larger with the PerfeXion than with the 4C (2 and 1, respectively). The mean number of isocenters used was lower (10.67 and 13.08, respectively). The median total treatment time was significantly shorter with the PerfeXion (40 and 60 minutes, respectively), but there was no significant difference in the median radiation time (34.02 and 33.40 minutes, respectively). The procedure was performed using only a single run in 98.99% of the PerfeXion cases and in 42% of the 4C cases. Collision risk on the 4C forced us to change the frame gamma angle for at least 1 shot in 24% of the patients and led to treatment in manual mode for at least 1 shot in 21% of the patients. Collision risk requiring technical adaptation did not occur with the PerfeXion. In 1 patient treated with the PerfeXion, the system required a direct collision check. In terms of dose to structures outside the target area, the PerfeXion delivers 8.2 times less to the vertex, 10 times less to the thyroid, 12.9 times less to the sternum, and 15 times less to the gonads.

CONCLUSION

Our prospective study indicates that procedures with the PerfeXion were collision-free, even with very eccentric lesions (e.g., multiple metastases). The duration of the surgical procedure, the amount of time required for nurse, physicist, and physician intervention on the machine, and the duration of the quality assurance procedure were all shown to be dramatically reduced with the PerfeXion gamma knife. Patient protection is greatly improved with the PerfeXion. In our experience, the technological advances of the Leksell Gamma Knife PerfeXion will make a very significant contribution to future progress in head and neck radiosurgery.

Linear accelerator and gamma knife-based stereotactic cranial radiosurgery: challenges and successes of existing quality assurance guidelines and paradigms

Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery has been practiced since 1951. The technique has expanded from a single dedicated unit in Stockholm in 1968 to hundreds of centers performing an estimated 100,000 Gamma Knife and linear accelerator cases in 2005. The radiation dosimetry of small photon fields used in this technique has been well explored in the past 15 years. Quality assurance recommendations have been promulgated in refereed reports and by several national and international professional societies since 1991. The field has survived several reported treatment errors and incidents, generally reacting by strengthening standards and precautions. An increasing number of computer-controlled and robotic-dedicated treatment units are expanding the field and putting patients at risk of unforeseen errors. Revisions and updates to previously published quality assurance documents, and especially to radiation dosimetry protocols, are now needed to ensure continued successful procedures that minimize the risk of serious errors.

Stereotactic device for Gamma Knife radiosurgery in experimental animals: technical note

OBJECTIVE

Radiosurgery has become a well-established treatment modality for many intracranial lesions and the information obtained from animal experiments is crucial in devising new strategies with improved efficacy and less risk. We constructed a stereotactic device for rats which can be used for both usual laboratory work and radiosurgery using a Gamma Knife.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The stereotactic device was made by modifying the basic design of the ordinary stereotactic frames used for usual laboratory work. It was developed for both Gamma Knife model B and C. An auxiliary tool was also devised which facilitates the placement of the target point at the radiation isocenter.

RESULTS

The reliability of the device was verified by checking the radiation profile and absorbed dose. The results of the experimental irradiation in normal and tumor-cell-inoculated rats demonstrated the usefulness of the device.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified animal stereotactic frame described herein can be used for both the production of experimental animal models and for performing radiosurgery with a common apparatus.

High precision radiosurgery and technical standards

BACKGROUND

A high degree of precision and accuracy in radiosurgery is a fundamental requirement for therapeutic success. Small radiation fields and steep dose gradients are clinically applied thus necessitating a dedicated quality assurance program in order to guarantee dosimetric and geometric accuracy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A detailed analysis of the course of treatment independent of the irradiation technique used results in the so-called chain of uncertainties in radiosurgery (immobilisation, imaging, treatment planning system, definition of regions of interest, mechanical accuracy, dose planning, dose verification). Each link in this chain is analysed for accuracy and the established quality assurance procedures are discussed. A "System Test" was used to check the whole chain of uncertainties simultaneously.

RESULTS

The tests described are compatible with published reports on quality assurance in radiosurgery. In terms of accuracy the weakest link in the chain of uncertainties is stereotactic MR imaging. Geometric overall accuracy measured in the "System Test" is less than 0.7 mm.

CONCLUSION

The established quality assurance routines have clinically been validated. MR imaging dominates geometric overall accuracy in radiosurgery, which can be limited to less than 1 mm by an adequate quality assurance protocol.

Use of the Leksell Gamma Knife for localized small field lens irradiation in rodents

For most basic radiobiological research applications involving irradiation of small animals, it is difficult to achieve the same high precision dose distribution realized with human radiotherapy. The precision for irradiations performed with standard radiotherapy equipment is +/-2 mm in each dimension, and is adequate for most human treatment applications. For small animals such as rodents, whose organs and tissue structures may be an order of magnitude smaller than those of humans, the corresponding precision required is closer to +/-0.2 mm, if comparisons or extrapolations are to be made to human data. The Leksell Gamma Knife is a high precision radiosurgery irradiator, with precision in each dimension not exceeding 0.5 mm, and overall precision of 0.7 mm. It has recently been utilized to treat ocular melanoma and induce targeted lesions in the brains of small animals. This paper describes the dosimetry and a technique for performing irradiation of a single rat eye and lens with the Gamma Knife while allowing the contralateral eye and lens of the same rat to serve as the "control". The dosimetry was performed with a phantom in vitro utilizing a pinpoint ion chamber and thermoluminescent dosimeters, and verified by Monte Carlo simulations. We found that the contralateral eye received less than 5% of the administered dose for a 15 Gy exposure to the targeted eye. In addition, after 15 Gy irradiation 15 out of 16 animals developed cataracts in the irradiated target eyes, while 0 out of 16 contralateral eyes developed cataracts over a 6-month period of observation. Experiments at 5 and 10 Gy also confirmed the lack of cataractogenesis in the contralateral eye. Our results validate the use of the Gamma Knife for cataract studies in rodents, and confirmed the precision and utility of the instrument as a small animal irradiator for translational radiobiology experiments.

Concomitant boost of stratified target area with gamma knife radiosurgery: a treatment planning study

Conventional Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSRS) has been focused on delivering a single peripheral dose to the gross target volume based on the anatomic information derived from the magnetic resonance or computed tomography (CT) studies. In this study, we developed a treatment planning approach that allows a boost dose to be delivered concomitantly to the desired subtarget area while maintaining the peripheral isodose coverage of the target volume. The subtarget area is defined as the high-risk or the tumor burden areas based on the functional imaging information such as the magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies or the physician's clinical diagnosis. Treatment plan comparisons were carried out between the concomitant boost plans and the conventional treatment plans using dose volume histogram (DVH), tissue volume ratio (TVR), and the maximum dose to the peripheral dose ratio (MD/PD) analysis. Using the concomitant boost approach, more conformal and higher dose was delivered to the desired subtarget area while maintaining the peripheral isodose coverage of the gross target volume (GTV). Additionally, the dose to the normal brain tissue was found to be equivalent between the concomitant boost plans and the conventional plans. As a result, we conclude that concomitant boost of a stratified target area is feasible for GKSRS.

Risk analysis of Leksell Gamma Knife Model C with automatic positioning system

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the decrease in risk from misadministration of the new Leksell Gamma Knife Model C with Automatic Positioning System compared with previous models.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Elekta Instruments, A.B. of Stockholm has introduced a new computer-controlled Leksell Gamma Knife Model C which uses motor-driven trunnions to reposition the patient between isocenters (shots) without human intervention. Previous models required the operators to manually set coordinates from a printed list, permitting opportunities for coordinate transposition, incorrect helmet size, incorrect treatment times, missing shots, or repeated shots.

RESULTS

A risk analysis was conducted between craniotomy involving hospital admission and outpatient Gamma Knife radiosurgery. A report of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies dated November 29, 1999 estimated that medical errors kill between 44,000 and 98,000 people each year in the United States. Another report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System estimates that 2.1 million nosocomial infections occur annually in the United States in acute care hospitals alone, with 31 million total admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

All medical procedures have attendant risks of morbidity and possibly mortality. Each patient should be counseled as to the risk of adverse effects as well as the likelihood of good results for alternative treatment strategies. This paper seeks to fill a gap in the existing medical literature, which has a paucity of data involving risk estimates for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Inverse treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery

An inverse treatment planning system for Gamma Knife radiosurgery has been developed using nonlinear programming techniques. The system optimizes the shot sizes, locations, and weights for Gamma Knife treatments. In the patient's prescription, the user can specify both the maximum number of shots of radiation and a minimum isodose line that must surround the entire treatment volume. After satisfying all of the constraints included in the prescription, the system maximizes the conformity of the dose distribution. This automated approach to treatment planning has been applied retrospectively to a series of patient cases, and each optimized plan has been compared to the corresponding manual plan produced by an experienced user. The results demonstrate that this tool can often improve the tumor dose homogeneity while using fewer shots than were included in the original plan. Therefore, inverse treatment planning should improve both the quality and the efficiency of Gamma Knife treatments.

An efficient method of measuring the 4 mm helmet output factor for the Gamma knife

It is essential to have accurate measurements of the 4 mm helmet output factor in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia patients using the Gamma Knife. Because of the small collimator size and the sharp dose gradient at the beam focus, this measurement is generally tedious and difficult. We have developed an efficient method of measuring the 4 mm helmet output factor using regular radiographic films. The helmet output factor was measured by exposing a single Kodak XV film in the standard Leksell spherical phantom using the 18 mm helmet with 30-40 of its plug collimators replaced by the 4 mm plug collimators. The 4 mm helmet output factor was measured to be 0.876 +/- 0.009. This is in excellent agreement with our EGS4 Monte Carlo simulated value of 0.876 +/- 0.005. This helmet output factor value also agrees with more tedious TLD, diode and radiochromic film measurements that were each obtained using two separate measurements with the 18 mm helmet and the 4 mm helmet respectively. The 4 mm helmet output factor measured by the diode was 0.884 +/- 0.016, and the TLD measurement was 0.890 +/- 0.020. The radiochromic film measured value was 0.870 +/- 0.018. Because a single-exposure measurement was performed instead of a double exposure measurement, most of the systematic errors that appeared in the double-exposure measurements due to experimental setup variations were cancelled out. Consequently, the 4 mm helmet output factor is more precisely determined by the single-exposure approach. Therefore, routine measurement and quality assurance of the 4 mm helmet output factor of the Gamma Knife could be efficiently carried out using the proposed single-exposure technique.

Quality assurance of beam accuracy for Leksell Gamma Unit

For the acceptance test and annual quality assurance of the Leksell Gamma Unit, measurement of the beam accuracy, defined as a distance between mechanical and radiological isocenters, poses a challenge to medical physicists. The specification for the beam accuracy is within 0.5 mm for the 4-mm collimator helmet. In this report, we introduce a simple technique to analyze the beam accuracy by using a conventional film densitometer plus mathematical modeling. A small piece of film was placed inside the film cassette containing a sharp needle. The needle is located such that its tip is exactly positioned at the mechanical isocenter. Before exposure, the film was pierced by the needle. Density profile was measured by using a densitometer with a spatial resolution of 0.8 mm. The profile was then fitted to a model of the two Gaussian functions. One is for the radiation field profile, the other for a dip caused by the narrow hole. The difference between the centers of the two Gaussian functions defines the deviation of the beam accuracy from the mechanical center of the unit. The deviations for x, y, and z directions from one of our annual measurements are 0.032, 0.054, and 0.195 mm, respectively. The combined deviation is 0.20 mm, which is well within the specification and in excellent agreement with the results from the manufacture's laser measurement. This technique provides a simple, accurate and practical tool for measurement of the beam accuracy in the acceptance test and annual quality assurance of the Leksell Gamma Unit.

Quality assurance for the Leksell gamma unit: considering magnetic resonance image-distortion and delineation failure in the targeting of the internal auditory canal

Our aim in this study was to distinguish quantitatively between the localization accuracy of a commercially available stereotactic fixation device as claimed by the manufacturer and the target accuracy as measured by a user, applying neuroradiologic imaging in Gamma Knife planning and phantom irradiation. Missing the target is the most serious possible failure in Gamma Knife and Linac therapy. To reduce this risk, we developed a quality control algorithm and designed a phantom. To evaluate the accuracy of the targeting procedure with a Leksell Gamma unit, and to experience the possible errors in all procedural steps, irradiations of phantoms were performed, using the so-called "unknown" targeting method. Accuracy is defined by the extent of spatial deviation of the irradiated target from the calculated target. Digital imaging was used for therapy planning. GafChromic films, which had been irradiated while affixed to a specially developed phantom, were used for measuring the precision of the radiation unit. A series of MR images (in two plains: transverse and coronal) was acquired sequentially to image the three-dimensional (3-D) volume of the phantom. The results obtained for isocentric accuracy of the Leksell Gamma unit, model B, were in good agreement to the calculated position. The observed spatial deviations between calculated and irradiated targets is less than 1 mm. The newly designed phantom and quality control algorithm are useful in quality assurance measurements of stereotactic radiation therapy.

Treatment planning of stereotactic convergent gamma-ray irradiation using Co-60 sources

The basic features of the convergent Co-60 gamma-ray unit, known as Gamma Knife and the standard procedures of treatment planning for various cases in general have been described in details. The new generation of the rotating gamma system and the future clinical applications are briefly mentioned.