Effects of buprenorphine in heroin addicts

Subjective effects of additional doses of buprenorphine in patients on buprenorphine maintenance

OBJECTIVES

Buprenorphine has considerable abuse potential. Patients who are maintained on buprenorphine (for opioid dependence) further use additional doses besides its maintenance dose. Subjective effects of the additional doses of buprenorphine in patients on buprenorphine maintenance patients is focused in this study.

METHODS

Nineteen subjects who were maintained on buprenorphine 4mg, s/l per day for at least 1month were admitted and given three additional doses of buprenorphine 2mg, s/l at the interval of 2h each and subjective effects were assessed with the help of standard tools after 2h of each dose and the next day also. Drug was given in a cumulative dose design in the inpatient unit of a de-addiction centre.

RESULTS

Dysphoria and sleepiness increased while euphoria and drug liking decreased with additional doses of buprenorphine. These changes were statistically significant and were highest at maximum cumulative dose of 10mg.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that abuse liability of buprenorphine in these subjects is low in higher doses. However, these findings need to be replicated in this group of patients to make a comment on clinical implication.

Buprenorphine-containing treatments: place in the management of opioid addiction

Although the synthetic opioid buprenorphine has been available clinically for almost 30 years, its use has only recently become much more widespread for the treatment of opioid addiction. The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of buprenorphine make it unique in the armamentarium of drugs for the treatment of opioid addiction. Buprenorphine has partial mu-opioid receptor agonist activity and is a kappa-opioid receptor antagonist; hence, it can substitute for other micro-opioid receptor agonists, yet is less apt to produce overdose reactions or dysphoria. On the other hand, buprenorphine can block the effects of opioids such as heroin (diamorphine) and morphine, and can even precipitate withdrawal in individuals physically dependent upon these drugs. Buprenorphine has significant sublingual bioavailability and a long half-life, making administration on a less than daily basis possible. Furthermore, its discontinuation is associated with only a mild withdrawal syndrome. Clinical trials have demonstrated that sublingual buprenorphine is effective in both maintenance therapy and detoxification of individuals addicted to opioids. The introduction of a sublingual formulation combining naloxone with buprenorphine further reduces the risk of diversion to illicit intravenous use. Because of its relative safety and lower risk of illegal diversion, buprenorphine has been made available in several countries for treating opioid addiction in the private office setting, greatly enhancing treatment options for this condition.

Intravenous buprenorphine self-administration by detoxified heroin abusers

Several sources indicate that intravenously administered buprenorphine may have significant abuse liability in humans. The present study evaluated the reinforcing effects of intravenously administered buprenorphine (0, 2, and 8 mg) in detoxified heroin-dependent participants during a 7.5-week inpatient study. Participants (n = 6) were detoxified from heroin over a 1.5-week period immediately after admission. Testing subsequently occurred in three 2-week blocks. During the first week of each 2-week block, the reinforcing effects of buprenorphine were evaluated. Participants first received a dose of buprenorphine and $20 and then were given either the opportunity to self-administer the dose or $20 during choice sessions. During the second week of each 2-week block, the direct effects of heroin were measured to evaluate potential long-lasting antagonist effects of buprenorphine. Progressive ratio break-point values were significantly higher after 2 and 8 mg of buprenorphine compared with placebo. Correspondingly, several positive subjective ratings increased after administration of active buprenorphine relative to placebo. Although there were few differences in peak effects produced by 2 versus 8 mg of buprenorphine, the higher buprenorphine dose generally produced longer-lasting effects. Heroin also produced dose-related increases in several subjective effects. Peak ratings produced by heroin were generally higher than peak ratings produced by buprenorphine. There was little evidence of residual antagonism produced by buprenorphine. These results demonstrate that buprenorphine served as a reinforcer under these conditions, and that it may have abuse liability in nonopioid-dependent individuals who abuse heroin.

Naloxone-induced withdrawal in patients with buprenorphine dependence

Naloxone-induced withdrawal was studied in seven patients currently dependent only on injecting buprenorphine, within 3 to 6 hours of their last dose. Withdrawal severity began to rise from 5 minutes and reached a peak at 60 minutes after 1.2 mg naloxone given intravenously. The mean withdrawal severity score was significantly higher at 30, 60 and 90 minutes compared to the baseline. The most frequent withdrawal signs and symptoms were mydriasis, systolic hypertension, tachypnoea, muscle pains, yawning, anxiety, restlessness and craving.

Consumption of buprenorphine and other drugs among heroin addicts under ambulatory treatment: results from cross-sectional studies in 1988 and 1990

We assessed the prevalence of consumption of buprenorphine and other drugs among heroin addicts under ambulatory treatment in two cross-sectional studies conducted in 1988 (188 subjects) and in 1990 (197 subjects). Patients were enrolled in one of three different programmes: methadone maintenance programme (MMP), antagonist maintenance programme (AMP) and drug-free programme (DFP). Information given by participants was compared with results of urine screening for drugs. Urine samples were tested using enzyme immunoassay for the detection of heroin, cocaine, dextropropoxyphene, cannabis and benzodiazepines, and radioimmunoassay for buprenorphine. Sixty-six percent of patients in 1988 and 71% of patients in 1990 reported having consumed buprenorphine at some time during their history of drug dependence (period prevalence) and 5.9% and 6.1%, respectively, tested positive to the drug (point prevalence). In over 70% of these patients consumption was by the intravenous route. Consumption of cannabis, cocaine and benzodiazepines was also very high in the study population. Overall, patients in the DFP group consumed the largest number of the drugs tested, while those in the AMP group consumed the smallest number. Abuse of buprenorphine could be more widespread than previously reported.

Assessment and management of opioid withdrawal symptoms in buprenorphine-dependent subjects

The spontaneous physical dependence of buprenorphine was assessed in opioid addicts who switched from heroin to sublingual or intravenous buprenorphine. Twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to double-blind administration of methadone (n = 11) or placebo (n = 11) for 13 days after abrupt withdrawal of buprenorphine. Methadone was administered according to four pre-established dosing schedules depending on the previous amount of daily consumed buprenorphine. No methadone-treated patient required modification of the therapeutic regimen, whereas eight of eleven placebo-treated patients needed treatment with methadone. Buprenorphine withdrawal syndrome was of opioid type, began somewhat more slowly, and showed a peak until day 5. The occurrence, time-course and characteristics of buprenorphine withdrawal syndrome make it necessary to reconsider the abuse potential of this analgesic.

Abuse liability studies of opioid agonist-antagonists in humans

Prediction of the abuse liability of a drug before it reaches the market is complicated by the fact that there are many factors that influence the actual abuse of a drug. Laboratory methods used in humans to assess the abuse liability of the opioids are reviewed and illustrative studies of morphine and the agonist-antagonist opioids, pentazocine, butorphanol, nalbuphine and buprenorphine, are presented. Three assessment methods, subjective effect measurement, self-administration and drug discrimination, provide information relevant to measuring reinforcing efficacy, a major determinant of the degree to which a drug is sought and self-administered by abusers. Physical dependence capacity, which can contribute to sustained drug use, is evaluated in direct addiction and substitution/suppression studies. Withdrawal precipitation studies measure antagonist activity which might limit abuse. The results of testing the agonist-antagonist opioids are generally consistent across these various methods and consistent with historical experience with these drugs, suggesting that these methods are useful in predicting abuse liability of novel opioids.

Safety and side-effects of buprenorphine in the clinical management of heroin addiction

Sublingual buprenorphine (8 mg) was administered to heroin-dependent addicts daily for 18 days and continued from day 19-day 36 either daily or on alternate days. Final data are reported on 18 subjects. The number of self-reported symptoms reviewed as potential adverse drug reactions ranged from 1 to 88 per participant. None was considered to be related definitely to the study medication, and there were no reporting differences between the two dosing regimens. Forty-five reactions were considered probably related to buprenorphine: sedation/drowsiness (three reports) and constipation (42 reports). It was concluded that these were anticipated drug effects rather than adverse reactions. Although some participants showed increases in serum aminotransferase levels, those increases could not be directly attributed to buprenorphine. We conclude that buprenorphine was well tolerated, but further study is needed in this population to delineate the possible attributable risk of the drug to hepatic dysfunction in this population.

Pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of opioid dependence and withdrawal

This article discusses current pharmacologic methods in the treatment of heroin dependence and withdrawal. Methadone hydrochloride, the most commonly used opiate agonist, is used for both withdrawal and maintenance therapy. However, it produces dependence and withdrawal results upon abrupt discontinuation. Other opiate agonists including L-alpha acetyl methadyl (LAAM) and propoxyphene napsylate have been used for both withdrawal and maintenance therapy. LAAM is currently available only as an investigational agent and propoxyphene is easily accessible but has been associated with hallucinations and dysphoria at high doses. Alpha 2-adrenergic agonists decrease opiate withdrawal symptoms by decreasing the central adrenergic hyperarousal that is associated with withdrawal. Clonidine effectively attenuates but does not totally eliminate withdrawal symptoms. Other alpha 2-adrenergic agonists (e.g., lofexidine hydrochloride, guanfacine hydrochloride, and guanabenz) have undergone only preliminary investigations. Although alpha 2 agonists effectively decrease most withdrawal symptoms they often cause hypotension. Buprenorphine hydrochloride is a partial opiate agonist that shows some promise in the treatment of the heroin-dependent population. It attenuates opiate craving and causes only minimal withdrawal upon abrupt discontinuation. Because it is well accepted by the heroin-dependent population, however, it may ultimately become an abused substance. Naltrexone is a potent, orally acting opiate antagonist that blocks all opiate-agonist effects and causes no euphoria. Unfortunately, it has not been well accepted by the heroin-dependent population. Scant research has been conducted concerning the use of adjunctive medications during opioid withdrawal.