Anaphylactoid reactions to protamine: An often lethal complication in insulin-dependent diabetic patients undergoing vascular surgery

Allergic and other adverse reactions to drugs used in anesthesia and surgery

The list of drugs patients may be exposed to during the perioperative and postoperative periods is potentially extensive. It includes induction agents, neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs), opioids, antibiotics, sugammadex, colloids, local anesthetics, polypeptides, antifibrinolytic agents, heparin and related anticoagulants, blue dyes, chlorhexidine, and a range of other agents depending on several factors related to individual patients’ clinical condition and progress in the postoperative recovery period. To avoid poor or ultrarapid metabolizers to a particular drug (for example tramadol and codeine) or possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs), some drugs may need to be avoided during or after surgery. This will be the case for patients with a history of anaphylaxis or other adverse events/intolerances to a known drug. Other drugs may be ceased for a period before surgery, e.g., anticoagulants that increase the chance of bleeding; diuretics for patients with acute renal failure; antihypertensives relative to kidney injury after major vascular surgery; and serotonergic drugs that together with some opioids may rarely induce serotonin toxicity. Studies of germline variations shown by genotyping and phenotyping to identify a predisposition of genetic factors to ADRs offer an increasingly important approach to individualize drug therapy. Studies of associations of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes with some serious delayed immune-mediated reactions are ongoing and variations of drug-metabolizing cytochrome CYP450 enzymes, P-glycoprotein, and catechol-O -methyltransferase show promise for the assessment of ADRs and non-responses to drugs, particularly opioids and other analgesics. Surveys of ADRs from an increasing number of institutions often cover small numbers of patients, are retrospective in nature, fail to clearly identify culprit drugs, and do not adequately distinguish immune-mediated from non-immune-mediated anaphylactoid reactions. From the many surveys undertaken, the large list of agents identified during and after anesthesia and surgery are examined for their ADR involvement. Drugs are classified into those most often involved, (NMBD and antibiotics); drugs that are becoming more frequently implicated, namely antibiotics (particularly teicoplanin), and blue dyes; those becoming less frequently involved; and drugs more rarely involved in perioperative, and postoperative adverse reactions but still important and necessary to keep in mind for the occasional potential sensitive patient. Clinicians should be aware of the similarities between drug-induced true allergic type I IgE/FcεRI- and pseudoallergic MRGPRX2-mediated ADRs, the clinical features of each, and their distinguishing characteristics. Procedures for identifying MRGPRX2 agonists and diagnosing and distinguishing pseudoallergic from allergic reaction mechanisms are discussed.

Protamine Induced Anaphylactic Shock after Peripheral Vascular Surgery

Anaphylactic reactions to protamine are quite rare and almost exclusively reported during cardiac surgery. In this report, we illustrate a rare case of protamine reaction after peripheral vascular surgery a couple of months after cardiac surgery and how the patient survived this critical complication.

Protamine Administration Via the Ascending Aorta May Prevent Cardiopulmonary Instability

OBJECTIVE

The method of protamine administration may influence adverse reactions. The authors investigated the effects of 3 different methods of protamine administration on cardiopulmonary function.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical study.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Human volunteer patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Ninety-five patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized prospectively into 3 groups. Group central vein control (CVC) and group central vein (CV) received protamine via a central vein over 10 minutes and 2 minutes, respectively. Group ascending aorta (AA) received protamine via the ascending aorta over 2 minutes. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at 7 intraoperative time points, and pulmonary parameters were assessed at 4 intraoperative time points.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The groups were similar regarding preoperative demographics, intraoperative care, and baseline cardiopulmonary function. However, both the CVC and CV groups exhibited decreased blood pressure and impaired pulmonary oxygenation after protamine administration; these changes were not observed in the AA group. Within-group changes in mean arterial blood pressure after protamine administration were significant in the AA group (mean increase 6.5 mmHg; p = 0.01) but not in the CVC (mean decrease 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.13) or CV (mean decrease 4.3 mmHg, p = 0.14) groups. Within-group changes in arterial oxygenation after protamine administration were significant in the CVC (mean decrease 85 mmHg; p<0.001) and CV (mean decrease 47 mmHg; p = 0.009) groups but not in the AA group (mean decrease 8 mmHg; p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that administration of protamine via the ascending aorta may be the preferred route. The potential ability of administering protamine via the ascending aorta to prevent cardiopulmonary instability in patients undergoing cardiac surgery deserves further clinical investigation.

Peri-operative anaphylaxis

Peri-operative anaphylaxis is an important cause for mortality and morbidity associated with anaesthesia. The true incidence is unknown and is most likely under reported. Diagnosis can be difficult, particularly as a number of drugs are given simultaneously and any of these agents can potentially cause anaphylaxis. This review covers the clinical features, differential diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis associated with anaesthesia. The investigations to confirm the clinical suspicion of anaphylaxis and further tests to identify the likely drug(s) are examined. Finally the salient features of common and rare causes including non-drug substances are described.

Use of methylene blue for catecholamine-refractory vasoplegia from protamine and aprotinin

We present two cases of catecholamine-refractory and vasopressin-refractory vasoplegic syndrome associated with intraoperative anaphylaxis during cardiac surgery. One case was related to the administration of protamine and the other case to the administration of aprotinin. Both cases were successfully managed using intravenous methylene blue. The use of methylene blue blocks accumulation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate by competitively inhibiting the enzyme guanylate cyclase. This results in reduced responsiveness of the vasculature to cyclic guanosine monophosphate-mediated vasodilators, such as nitric oxide. This report provides a description of severe anaphylaxis induced by different agents, in which the use of methylene blue was associated with a significant clinical response.

Serious anaphylactic reactions due to protamine sulfate: a systematic literature review

Anaphylactic reactions caused by injection of protamine sulfate during cardiac surgery are a well-known complication. A systematic literature review was therefore conducted to gather evidence of the knowledge concerning these side effects, and to see if any prospective randomized studies supported this. Studies investigating the effect of protamine sulfate in human beings were extracted from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library, retrieving 487 articles. Abstracts were evaluated by both authors, and referred articles not found in the primary search were furthermore extracted from reviews and case reports, resulting in a total of 272 relevant articles. Of these, 9 retrospective studies and 16 prospective studies were performed in an evidence-based manner. However, only 3 of the 16 prospective articles had an optimal design as far as inclusion criteria, randomization, and description of symptoms were concerned. Incidence of anaphylactic reactions in the prospective studies was 0.69% compared to 0.19% in the retrospective studies, but caution should be taken due to a pronounced heterogeneity of those studies. One study found heparinase I unsuitable as replacement for protamine sulfate. Overall, our findings support the low incidence of anaphylactic reactions reported in previous studies, but of note only few prospective investigations was conducted on the subject. Our study also emphasizes the need for critical appraisal of many routine procedures: in all aspects of medical care, systematic literature review conducted in a well-structured, repeated manner should be given high priority.

Toxicities associated with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion and isolated limb infusion in the treatment of melanoma and sarcoma

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) and isolated limb infusion (ILI) may play a significant role in the treatment of patients with recurrent or in transit extremity melanoma or sarcoma that is unresectable. These procedures may be indicated when patients are otherwise faced with the possibility of a debilitating amputation. Not entirely benign treatment modalities, HILP and ILI can be associated with regional and systemic toxicities. We conducted a literature search of published studies using HILP and ILI for the treatment of extremity sarcomas and melanomas, and associated toxicities was performed. The regional toxicities of HILP and ILI are similar. The most common toxicities reported are mild to moderate. However, when severe regional toxicity occurs, albeit infrequently (<5%), fasciotomies or even amputation may be necessary. Some studies have showed a relationship between acute regional toxicities and long term regional morbidity. Systemic toxicity appears to be more frequent when TNF-alpha is used in combination with other drugs during HILP, however the use of TNF-alpha in the United States is limited to trials. Although regional toxicities are similar, systemic toxicity of ILI is minimal compared to HILP. ILI is easier to repeat, technically less complex, and may be more acceptable in infirmed patients. Long term morbidity and outcomes for ILI are still being evaluated. Both of these techniques may be suitable options in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent, or in transit extremity melanoma or sarcoma.

Phase 1b randomized study of antidote-controlled modulation of factor IXa activity in patients with stable coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Whether selective factor IXa inhibition produces an appropriate anticoagulant effect when combined with platelet-directed therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease is unknown. REG1 consists of RB006 (drug), an injectable RNA aptamer that specifically binds and inhibits factor IXa, and RB007 (antidote), the complementary oligonucleotide that neutralizes its anti-IXa activity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic profile of REG1 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, assigning 50 subjects with coronary artery disease taking aspirin and/or clopidogrel to 4 dose levels of RB006 (15, 30, 50, and 75 mg) and RB007 (30, 60, 100, and 150 mg). The median age was 61 years (25th and 75th percentiles, 56 and 68 years), and 80% of patients were male. RB006 increased the activated partial thromboplastin time dose dependently; the median activated partial thromboplastin time at 10 minutes after a single intravenous bolus of 15, 30, 50, and 75 mg RB006 was 29.2 seconds (25th and 75th percentiles, 28.1 and 29.8 seconds), 34.6 seconds (25th and 75th percentiles, 30.9 and 40.0 seconds), 46.9 seconds (25th and 75th percentiles, 40.3 and 51.1 seconds), and 52.2 seconds (25th and 75th percentiles, 46.3 and 58.6) (P<0.0001; normal 25th and 75th percentiles, 27 and 40 seconds). RB007 reversed the activated partial thromboplastin time to baseline levels within a median of 1 minute (25th and 75th percentiles, 1 and 2 minutes) with no rebound increase through 7 days. No major bleeding or other serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first experience of an RNA aptamer drug-antidote pair achieving inhibition and active restoration of factor IXa activity in combination with platelet-directed therapy in stable coronary artery disease. The preliminary clinical safety and predictable pharmacodynamic effects form the basis for ongoing studies in patients undergoing elective revascularization procedures.

A novel antidote-controlled anticoagulant reduces thrombin generation and inflammation and improves cardiac function in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

Heparin and protamine are the standard anticoagulant-antidote regimen used in almost every cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedure even though both are associated with an array of complications and toxicities. Here we demonstrate that an anticoagulant aptamer-antidote pair targeting factor IXa can replace heparin and protamine in a porcine CPB model and also limit the adverse effects on thrombin generation, inflammation, and cardiac physiology associated with heparin and protamine use. These results demonstrate that targeting clotting factors upstream of thrombin in the coagulation cascade can potentially reduce the perioperative pathologies associated with CPB and suggest that the aptamer-antidote pair to FIXa may improve the outcome of patients undergoing CPB. In particular, this novel anticoagulant-antidote pair may prove to be useful in patients diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or those who have been sensitized to protamine, particularly patients who have insulin-dependent diabetes.

PEG-Modified Protamine with Improved Pharmacological/Pharmaceutical Properties as a Potential Protamine Substitute: Synthesis and in Vitro Evaluation

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures are frequently associated with massive inflammatory responses, resulting in a high rate of morbidity and mortality in routine cardiac operations. One recognized attribute of these deleterious responses is the synergic effect of heparin and protamine, which elicit the activation of the complement system in vivo. To circumvent such toxic effects following protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation in the CPB procedures, we proposed that poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-modified protamine could retain the heparin-neutralization ability and yet diminish the induced complement activation by the formed heparin-protamine complexes (HPC), thereby providing highly improved pharmacological properties. PEGylation of protamine was carried out by utilizing N-hydroxysuccinimidyl (NHS) conjugation chemistry. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC), reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), and matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) were used to assess the conjugation stiochiometry, the purity of the conjugates, and the site of PEG modification, respectively. The heparin-neutralizing activity was determined by using heparin affinity chromatography and various biological assays including the plasma-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), anti-Xa, and anti-IIa methods. The potency in inducing complement activation was examined in vitro using the CH50 hemolytic assay. The PEG-modified protamine was successfully synthesized with a PEG/protamine stiochiometry of 1:1. Only one conjugation site for PEG that was located at the N-terminal end of protamine was obtained. In the biological evaluations, the PEG-modified protamine displayed a full retention of the heparin-neutralizing ability of protamine and a significantly reduced activity in complement activation following its complexation with heparin. Results from studies of the particle size and zeta potential indicated that the PEG-modified protamine formed substantially smaller aggregates with heparin, rendering them less effective in triggering the size-dependent complement responses. As with protamine, PEG-modified protamine exhibited an enhanced aqueous solubility, therefore attaining significantly improved pharmaceutical properties. These preliminary results suggested that the PEG-modified protamine conjugate might serve as a potential protamine substitute with improved therapeutic and pharmaceutical properties in heparin reversal.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for peripheral arterial occlusive disease is part of the seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs, and Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004;126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients with chronic limb ischemia, we recommend lifelong aspirin therapy in comparison to no antiplatelet therapy in patients with clinically manifest coronary or cerebrovascular disease (Grade 1A) and in those without clinically manifest coronary or cerebrovascular disease (Grade 1C+). We recommend clopidogrel over no antiplatelet therapy (Grade 1C+) but suggest that aspirin be used instead of clopidogrel (Grade 2A). For patients with disabling intermittent claudication who do not respond to conservative measures and who are not candidates for surgical or catheter-based intervention, we suggest cilostazol (Grade 2A). We suggest that clinicians not use cilostazol in patients with less-disabling claudication (Grade 2A). In these patients, we recommend against the use of pentoxifylline (Grade 1B). We suggest clinicians not use prostaglandins (Grade 2B). In patients with intermittent claudication, we recommend against the use of anticoagulants (Grade 1A). In patients with acute arterial emboli or thrombosis, we recommend treatment with immediate systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 1C]. We also recommend systemic anticoagulation with UFH followed by long-term vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with embolism [Grade 1C]). For patients undergoing major vascular reconstructive procedures, we recommend UFH at the time of application of vascular cross-clamps (Grade 1A). In patients undergoing prosthetic infrainguinal bypass, we recommend aspirin (Grade 1A). In patients undergoing infrainguinal femoropopliteal or distal vein bypass, we suggest that clinicians do not routinely use a VKA (Grade 2A). For routine patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass without special risk factors for occlusion, we recommend against VKA plus aspirin (Grade 1A). For those at high risk of bypass occlusion and limb loss, we suggest VKA plus aspirin (Grade 2B). In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, we recommend aspirin preoperatively and continued indefinitely (Grade 1A). In nonoperative patients with asymptomatic or recurrent carotid stenosis, we recommend lifelong aspirin (Grade 1C+). For all patients undergoing extremity balloon angioplasty, we recommend long-term aspirin (Grade 1C+).

Mortality and adverse events after protamine administration in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

We designed this study to determine whether adverse hemodynamic events after a protamine administration increase the risk of in-hospital mortality. Using a retrospective cohort study design, medical and anesthesia records of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, between 1990 and 1994 were reviewed. Adverse events after a protamine administration were determined using strict, predefined criteria, and in-hospital mortality was assessed without knowledge of exposure status. Mortality was more frequent among the 53 patients with adverse events (13.2%) than the 223 patients without events (2.7%; crude odds ratio 5.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-20.6). After adjusting for confounders, the odds ratio was 6.98 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-35.9; P = 0.017). Those suffering severe events had the highest mortality (23.5% compared with 8.3% among those with less severe events versus 2.7% among those without any event, P = 0.001 for trend). In addition, the odds ratio was largest when using the strictest definition for protamine-related events. In conclusion, patients undergoing CPB who experience adverse events after a protamine administration have an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Further studies to confirm these findings and development and testing of protamine alternatives or prophylactic therapies are required to determine if mortality can be reduced.

IMPLICATIONS

A retrospective cohort study demonstrated an association between adverse events after a protamine administration and increased in-hospital mortality.

Alternatives to unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiopulmonary bypass

Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated heparin, protamine or both cannot be used for various reasons. Intolerance of protamine can be addressed with extracorporeal heparin removal devices, perfusion with (no) low systemic heparinization and, to some degree, by perfusion with alternative anticoagulants. Various alternative anticoagulation regimens have been used in cases of intolerance to unfractionated heparin, including extreme hemodilution, low molecular weight heparins, danaparoid, ancrod, r-hirudin, abciximab, tirofiban, argatroban and others. In the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis, the use of r-hirudin appears to be an acceptable solution which has been well studied. The main issue with r-hirudin is the difficulty in monitoring its activity during CPB, despite the fact that ecarin coagulation time assessment is now available. A more recent approach is based on selective blockage of platelet aggregation by means of monoclonal antibodies directed to GPIIb/IIIa receptors (abciximab) or the use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban). An 80% blockage of the GPIIb/IIIa receptors and suppression of platelet aggregation to less than 20% allows the giving of unfractionated heparin and running CPB in a standard fashion despite HIT and thrombosis. Likewise, at the end of the procedure, unfractionated heparin is neutralized with protamine as usual and donor platelets are transfused if necessary. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors are frequently used in interventional cardiology and, therefore, are available in most hospitals.

The effect of differing rates and injection sites on the amount of protamine delivered before detection of hemodynamic alterations in dogs

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of the route and rate of protamine administration on the amount of protamine that could be delivered before a hemodynamic reaction occurred in dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized experimental study.

ANIMALS

Twenty adult mixed-breed dogs weighing 25.1+/-2.5 kg.

METHODS

Before vascular surgery, the dogs were heparinized to reach an activated clotting time (ACT) of 300 seconds. After completion of the vascular surgery, protamine was administered intravenously until a hemodynamic reaction was recorded. The 4 groups of dogs were given protamine at 5 mg/min (slow) or 10 mg/min (fast) via the cephalic or the jugular veins. Systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, central venous pressure (CVP), and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure (PAOP) were recorded before and after protamine administration. The dose of protamine was recorded when a reaction occurred, which was defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) <60 mm Hg or mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) >20 mm Hg or more than double the baseline value.

RESULTS

Significant decreases in systolic arterial pressure (SAP), MAP, and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and significant increases in systolic (SPAP), mean (MPAP), and diastolic (DPAP) pulmonary arterial pressures were recorded after protamine administration. The cephalic slow group had significantly fewer protamine reactions than other groups (chi-square = 8.57, P = .03, df = 3). Significantly more protamine could be delivered from the cephalic vein (52.5+/-14.5 mg) compared with the jugular vein (37.6+/-16 mg) before a reaction occurred (P = .048).

CONCLUSION

The rate of administration did not have an effect on the amount of protamine delivered. Adverse reactions were minimized when protamine was administered via the cephalic vein at a slow rate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We would recommend delivering protamine after cardiopulmonary bypass or vascular surgery through a peripheral venous route.

Allergy to protamine sulfate

Adverse responses to protamine sulfate have been identified for many years. The antigen-antibody response to protamine sulfate results in a type I anaphylactic reaction. Manifestations of allergic reactions include hypotension, bronchospasm, and skin and mucous membrane reactions. The severity of the adverse responses may vary from mild to causing death. Several potential risk factors for adverse reactions to protamine have been identified, including insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, vasectomy, allergy to fish, prior exposure to protamine sulfate, and the rate of infusion. A case study is presented, and strategies for improving patient outcomes are discussed.

Risk factors for clinically important adverse events after protamine administration following cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for adverse events following protamine administration after cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND

Intravenous protamine administration is associated with a risk of severe systemic reactions. However, risk factors for these events have not been well delineated, thus hampering development of preventive strategies.

METHODS

A case-control study nested within a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass was performed. The primary case definition included those events (pulmonary hypertensive and systemic hypotensive) occurring within 10 min of protamine administration in the absence of other measurable causes of hemodynamic compromise.

RESULTS

Comparing the 53 cases to the 223 control subjects, three risk factors were independently associated with events (multivariable odds ratio [95% confidence interval]): neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin use (8.18 [2.08, 32.2]); fish allergy (24.5 [1.24, 482.3]), and a history of nonprotamine medication allergy (2.97 [1.25, 7.07]). These risk factors demonstrated an increasingly strong association with progressively more specific case definitions. An estimated 39% of cardiopulmonary bypass patients had one or more of these risk factors. Prior intravenous protamine, central venous pressure prior to protamine, preoperative ejection fraction and the need for inotropes when coming off bypass did not exhibit statistically significant associations with events (all p > 0.15). Prior protamine allergy was associated specifically with an increased risk of pulmonary hypertension (multivariable odds ratio 189; 95% confidence interval 13, 2,856).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunologic factors are important in predisposing individuals to protamine reactions, and a substantial proportion of patients are at considerably increased risk Strategies to reduce the risk of protamine-associated events are needed.

Adverse events after protamine administration in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: risks and predictors of under-reporting

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass over 2 years at a single hospital was performed to determine the rate and predictors of attributing events to protamine and reporting them to a well-developed, hospital-based adverse drug reaction (ADR) program. Overall, 123 (12.9%) of 952 procedures were associated with an adverse event. Thirteen percent of these events were attributed to protamine in the medical record and 2.4% were reported to the ADR program. Only 19% of events attributed to protamine were reported. Even after excluding events with other measurable etiologies, the incidence of adverse events (2.6%) was still higher than that of attributed (0.8%) or reported (0.3%) events. Events that manifest as pulmonary hypertension occurred sooner after protamine, or were severe were significantly more likely to be attributed to protamine. These predictors demonstrated similar relationships with the probability of reporting events. Reliance on reporting of adverse events could not only underestimate the risk of these events, but might bias studies by identifying non-representative events.

A novel protamine variant reversal of heparin anticoagulation in human blood in vitro

PURPOSE

Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation during cardiovascular surgery may cause severe hypotension and pulmonary hypertension. A novel protamine variant, [+18RGD], has been developed that effectively reverses heparin anticoagulation without toxicity in canine experiments. Heretofore, human studies have not been undertaken. This investigation hypothesized that [+18RGD] would effectively reverse heparin anticoagulation of human blood in vitro.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent anticoagulation therapy during vascular surgery had blood sampled at baseline and 30 minutes after receiving heparin (150 IU/kg). Activated clotting times were used to define specific quantities of [+18RGD] or protamine necessary to completely reverse heparin anticoagulation in the blood sample of each patient. These defined amounts of [+18RGD] or protamine were then administered to the heparinized blood samples, and percent reversals of activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin clotting time, and antifactor Xa/IIa levels were determined. In addition, platelet aggregation assays, as well as platelet and white blood cell counts were performed.

RESULTS

[+18RGD] and protamine were equivalent in reversing heparin as assessed by thrombin clotting time, antifactor Xa, antifactor IIa levels, and white blood cell changes. [+18RGD], when compared with protamine, was superior in this regard, as assessed by activated partial thromboplastin time (94.5 +/- 1.0 vs 86.5 +/- 1.3% delta, respectively; p < 0.001) and platelet declines (-3.9 +/- 2.9 vs -12.8 +/- 3.4 per mm3, respectively; p = 0.048). Platelet aggregation was also decreased for [+18RGD] compared with protamine (23.6 +/- 1.5 vs 28.5 +/- 1.9%, respectively; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

[+18RGD] was as effective as protamine for in vitro reversal of heparin anticoagulation by most coagulation assays, was statistically more effective at reversal than protamine by aPTT assay, and was associated with lesser platelet reductions than protamine. [+18RGD], if less toxic than protamine in human beings, would allow for effective clinical reversal of heparin anticoagulation.

Protamine use during peripheral vascular surgery: a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

One hundred twenty patients undergoing aortic reconstruction (40), infrainguinal bypass (49), and carotid endarterectomy (31) were prospectively enrolled into a double-blind randomized trial to investigate the utility of routine heparin reversal with protamine.

METHODS

All patients underwent systemic heparinization with 90 U/kg body weight during operation and after revascularization were randomized to receive either protamine or saline solution for heparin reversal. Blood loss was measured throughout the surgical procedure, and indexes of coagulation and the requirement for blood and blood products were documented during operation and the first 24 hours after operation.

RESULTS

Plasma heparin concentration, partial thromboplastin time, and activated clotting time were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in those receiving saline solution at 20 minutes and 1 hour after administration. Total surgical blood loss was not significantly different between study groups. No significant differences were found in blood product requirement, intravenous fluid administered, hematocrit, or wound hematomas between groups at 24 hours. In addition, no difference was seen in the surgeon's subjective intraoperative assessment of hemostasis after administration of either study drug. Furthermore, after study drug administration protamine was associated with a deleterious effect on subsequent intraoperative blood loss (318 +/- 33 ml vs 195 +/- 18 ml, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although protamine effectively reverses heparin anticoagulation, its routine use after elective peripheral vascular surgical reconstruction does not appear to provide any clinical benefit.

Heparin and protamine use in peripheral vascular surgery: a comparison between surgeons of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the European Society for Vascular Surgery

It was the intent of this study to document, in general, the patterns and complications of heparin and protamine usage during carotid endarterectomy, aortic and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstructions for occlusive disease, elective and emergent abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy, thromboembolectomy, and dialysis arteriovenous (AV) fistula placement by surgeons from North America and Europe. All vascular surgeons from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) were surveyed by a voluntary, self-reported questionnaire. Six hundred and forty-six completed questionnaires (284 from SVS and 362 from ESVS), representing a 62% response rate, were returned for evaluation. Systemic and regional administration of heparin was common during vascular procedures performed by both SVS and ESVS surgeons. Use of protamine to reverse heparin anticoagulation varied among SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, during: carotid endarterectomy (54% vs. 26%, p < 0.01), elective aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease (58% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), elective aortic reconstruction for abdominal aortic aneurysm (63% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstruction (44% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Adverse reactions to protamine among the 25,219 and 12,902 cases reported from SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, included: hypotension (1209 and 495 cases), pulmonary artery hypertension (65 and eight cases), anaphylaxis (52 and 10 cases), and death (seven and two cases). These adverse responses accounted for 5.3% and 4.0% of the SVS and ESVS cases, respectively. Although this study is subject to the known limitations of a retrospective survey, it is clear that heparin use is common. Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation is more common in North America.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Whither the rationale for thrombolytic agent administration? A retrospective review of traditional intuitive decision-making using a decision analysis model

Of 50 consecutive patients admitted to Nenagh Hospital coronary care unit 50 per cent did not develop a myocardial infarction. Only 10 patients had definite evidence of infarction on admission. Of the 40 remaining patients, only 15 subsequently developed electrocardiographic and enzymatic confirmation of infarction. Streptokinase was administered to 5 patients who did not infarct, and was not given to 10 patients who did. These decisions to use or withhold thrombolytic therapy were retrospectively reviewed using a computer programme incorporating a decision analysis of the benefits and risks of thrombolysis. The programme examined four scenarios that used different estimates of the chance of death from infarction (pdiMI), and different safety profiles of thrombolytics. The scenario that assumed the worst safety profile and estimated pdiMI from patient age would have recommended thrombolytic treatment to the most with, and to the least without, acute infarction (i.e. 60 per cent of patients with an infarct and 8 per cent without an infarct would have been treated). Depending on the scenario assumed, the traditional intuitive method of decision-making gained from 0.08 and 0.25 quality adjusted life years (QALY's) for the average patient. Had decision analysis been used to guide these decisions these gains would have been enhanced by from 0.21 to 0.28 QALY's per patient, regardless of scenario used.

Absence of complement-mediated events after protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation

Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation is associated with adverse hemodynamic effects that may be attenuated with protamine pretreatment (PP). This study assesses the role of complement activation during these phenomena in adult cardiac surgery patients. Sixteen individuals undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass were given intravenous normal saline or protamine (2 mg/kg) as a randomized pretreatment prior to undergoing heparin anticoagulation (400 IU/kg), coronary artery revascularization, and subsequent reversal of the anticoagulated state with protamine (4 mg/kg). Blood pressure, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PAD), heart rate, and cardiac output (CO) were measured during and after pretreatment, prior to heparin reversal by protamine, and for 10 min after reversal. Total hemolytic complement (CH50), C3 conversion to C3b, C3a/C5a, platelet count, and white blood cell count (WBC) were also measured at the same time periods. No significant correlation existed between complement activation and hemodynamic events, as might have been evident by decreased CH50, increased C3 conversion to C3b, or elevations in C3a/C5a levels. PP significantly prevented the CO decrease occurring at 1 and 3 min following heparin reversal by protamine (-0.8 and -1.4 liters/min vs 0.1 and -0.2 liters/min, P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.01, respectively). Reversal hypotension was less with PP, although PAD fell equally in both groups. WBC decreases after heparin reversal were less after PP (-25% vs -7%, P = 0.06). These data support the conclusion that, contrary to earlier reports, adverse hemodynamic and hematologic responses accompanying protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation do not appear to be correlated with activation of complement. In fact, those patients having the greatest C3a generation exhibited the least hemodynamic changes.

Increased prostacyclin and adverse hemodynamic responses to protamine sulfate in an experimental canine model

Prostanoid activity was correlated with the hemodynamic effects of protamine sulfate reversal of heparin in 24 dogs undergoing three different pretreatment regimens: Group I (n = 8) received saline, Group II (n = 8) received the thromboxane synthetase inhibitor U63,557A (30 mg/kg), and Group III (n = 8) received indomethacin (10 mg/kg). Pretreatment substances were administered as 5-min intravenous infusions 20 min before anticoagulation with intravenous heparin (150 IU/kg). Protamine sulfate (1.5 mg/kg) was subsequently given as a 10-sec intravenous infusion 30 min after heparin had been administered. Hemodynamic data, as well as prostacyclin (PGI2) and thromboxane (TxA2) activity in aortic, venous, and pulmonary artery blood samples, were assessed over a 30-min time period following protamine administration. Group III indomethacin pretreatment provided the most protection from declines in blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, venous oxygen saturation, oxygen consumption, and elevations in pulmonary pressures and was accompanied with actual declines in PGI2. Group II U63,557A pretreatment was associated with the most severe hemodynamic changes and the greatest increase in PGI2 (+576%). Elevated PGI2 correlated with hypotension at 1 and 3 min (P less than 0.01), as well as pulmonary artery pressure declines at all times following protamine reversal. TxA2 changes did not correlate with hemodynamic changes. Protamine's adverse hemodynamic responses were attenuated with cyclooxygenase blockade by indomethacin, but were worsened with selective TxA2 blockade with U63,557A. Excess arachadonic acid precursors in the latter setting may increase PGI2 production. This study, for the first time, raises the possibility that PGI2 contributes to the adverse effects accompanying protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation.

Immunologic response to collagen-impregnated vascular grafts: a randomized prospective study. The Canadian Multicenter Hemashield Study Group

The potential for bovine collagen-impregnated vascular prostheses to stimulate an immune response was tested in 128 patients randomized prospectively to receive either a Dacron graft or a Dacron graft with collagen coating. Clinical variables and laboratory tests for antibovine collagen antibody were used to identify patients who developed humoral immunity up to 6 months after graft implantation. In a subgroup of 20 subjects, a lymphocyte proliferation assay by freshly isolated leukocytes was used to test for cell-mediated immune response. Of the patients randomized to receive a collagen-coated graft, five showed seroconversion to bovine, type I collagen. Seroconversion also occurred in one of the patients randomized to the noncollagen coated graft. No patient had a positive lymphocyte proliferation response, indicating an absence of cell-mediated immune response. No evidence for the development of cross-reactivity with human collagen was seen. The potential for bovine collagen to stimulate an immune response after implantation of a collagen-coated graft is low. The response is weak, and when it does occur it appears to be without clinical consequences.

Reversal of depressed oxygen consumption accompanying in vivo protamine sulphate-heparin interactions by the prostacyclin analogue, iloprost

Oxygen consumption (VO2) is known to be depressed 50 to 60% during protamine sulphate reversal of heparin anticoagulation. Accompanying this event are systemic hypotension, pulmonary artery hypertension and thrombocytopaenia. The effect of a pro-stacyclin analogue, iloprost, on protamine-induced changes in VO2 was assessed in this investigation. Three groups of anaesthetised adult mongrel dogs were studied: Group I--control subjects received i.v. normal saline infusions (n = 10); Group II--subjects received low-dose i.v. iloprost infusions (25-50 ng/kg/min) over 30 min (n = 7); and Group III--subjects received high-dose i.v. iloprost infusions (175 ng/kg/min) over 30 min (n = 7). All dogs initially received sodium heparin, 150 IU/kg i.v. Protamine sulphate, 1.5 mg/kg i.v., was subsequently administered over 10 s following the first 20 min of saline or iloprost infusion. Continuous measurements included: mixed venous (SvO2) and arterial (SaO2) oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, heart rate and carotid artery flow (CaQ). Thermodilution cardiac output (CO) allowed calculation of VO2. Platelet counts were performed before and 3 min after protamine infusion. The VO2 declines in Group II and III subjects compared to Group I controls were markedly less. Maximum VO2 declines in Group I control dogs of -38.2 +/- 26.7% and Group II dogs of -34.1 +/- 36.8% at 75 to 90 s post-reversal contrasted to -2.9 +/- 31.9% in Group III animals at the same time interval. VO2 increases occurred 3 to 10 min after protamine exposure in Group III animals, as did attenuation of systemic hypotensive and pulmonary hypertensive responses in this group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)