Mutation induced by DNA damage: a many protein affair

The SOS Error-Prone DNA Polymerase V Mutasome and β-Sliding Clamp Acting in Concert on Undamaged DNA and during Translesion Synthesis

In the mid 1970s, Miroslav Radman and Evelyn Witkin proposed that Escherichia coli must encode a specialized error-prone DNA polymerase (pol) to account for the 100-fold increase in mutations accompanying induction of the SOS regulon. By the late 1980s, genetic studies showed that SOS mutagenesis required the presence of two “UV mutagenesis” genes, umuC and umuD, along with recA. Guided by the genetics, decades of biochemical studies have defined the predicted error-prone DNA polymerase as an activated complex of these three gene products, assembled as a mutasome, pol V Mut = UmuD’₂C-RecA-ATP. Here, we explore the role of the β-sliding processivity clamp on the efficiency of pol V Mut-catalyzed DNA synthesis on undamaged DNA and during translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Primer elongation efficiencies and TLS were strongly enhanced in the presence of β. The results suggest that β may have two stabilizing roles: its canonical role in tethering the pol at a primer-3’-terminus, and a possible second role in inhibiting pol V Mut’s ATPase to reduce the rate of mutasome-DNA dissociation. The identification of umuC, umuD, and recA homologs in numerous strains of pathogenic bacteria and plasmids will ensure the long and productive continuation of the genetic and biochemical journey initiated by Radman and Witkin.

Replisome activity slowdown after exposure to ultraviolet light in Escherichia coli

The replisome is a multiprotein machine that is responsible for replicating DNA. During active DNA synthesis, the replisome tightly associates with DNA. In contrast, after DNA damage, the replisome may disassemble, exposing DNA to breaks and threatening cell survival. Using live cell imaging, we studied the effect of UV light on the replisome of Escherichia coli Surprisingly, our results showed an increase in Pol III holoenzyme (Pol III HE) foci post-UV that do not colocalize with the DnaB helicase. Formation of these foci is independent of active replication forks and dependent on the presence of the χ subunit of the clamp loader, suggesting recruitment of Pol III HE at sites of DNA repair. Our results also showed a decrease of DnaB helicase foci per cell after UV, consistent with the disassembly of a fraction of the replisomes. By labeling newly synthesized DNA, we demonstrated that a drop in the rate of synthesis is not explained by replisome disassembly alone. Instead, we show that most replisomes continue synthesizing DNA at a slower rate after UV. We propose that the slowdown in replisome activity is a strategy to prevent clashes with engaged DNA repair proteins and preserve the integrity of the replication fork.

Roles of Bacillus subtilis RecA, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Translesion Synthesis Polymerases in Counteracting Cr(VI)-Promoted DNA Damage

Bacteria deploy global programs of gene expression, including components of the SOS response, to counteract the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of environmental DNA-damaging factors. Here we report that genetic damage promoted by hexavalent chromium elicited the SOS response in Bacillus subtilis, as evidenced by the induction of transcriptional uvrA-lacZ, recA-lacZ, and P _recA-gfp fusions. Accordingly, B. subtilis strains deficient in homologous recombination (RecA) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) (UvrA), components of the SOS response, were significantly more sensitive to Cr(VI) treatment than were cells of the wild-type strain. These results strongly suggest that Cr(VI) induces the formation in growing B. subtilis cells of cytotoxic and genotoxic bulky DNA lesions that are processed by RecA and/or the NER pathways. In agreement with this notion, Cr(VI) significantly increased the formation of DNA-protein cross-links (DPCs) and induced mutagenesis in recA- and uvrA-deficient B. subtilis strains, through a pathway that required YqjH/YqjW-mediated translesion synthesis. We conclude that Cr(VI) promotes mutagenesis and cell death in B. subtilis by a mechanism that involves the formation of DPCs and that such deleterious effects are counteracted by both the NER and homologous recombination pathways, belonging to the RecA-dependent SOS system.IMPORTANCE It has been shown that, following permeation of cell barriers, Cr(VI) kills B. subtilis cells following a mechanism of reactive oxygen species-promoted DNA damage, which is counteracted by the guanine oxidized repair system. Here we report a distinct mechanism of Cr(VI)-promoted DNA damage that involves production of DPCs capable of eliciting the bacterial SOS response. We also report that the NER and homologous recombination (RecA) repair pathways, as well as low-fidelity DNA polymerases, counteract this metal-induced mechanism of killing in B. subtilis Hence, our results contribute to an understanding of how environmental pollutants activate global programs of gene expression that allow bacteria to contend with the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of heavy metals.

Better living with hyper-mutation

The simplest forms of mutations, base substitutions, typically have negative consequences, aside from their existential role in evolution and fitness. Hypermutations, mutations on steroids, occurring at frequencies of 10(-2) -10(-4) per base pair, straddle a domain between fitness and death, depending on the presence or absence of regulatory constraints. Two facets of hypermutation, one in Escherichia coli involving DNA polymerase V (pol V), the other in humans, involving activation-induced deoxycytidine deaminase (AID) are portrayed. Pol V is induced as part of the DNA-damage-induced SOS regulon, and is responsible for generating the lion's share of mutations when catalyzing translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Four regulatory mechanisms, temporal, internal, conformational, and spatial, activate pol V to copy damaged DNA and then deactivate it. On the flip side of the coin, SOS-induced pols V, IV, and II mutate undamaged DNA, thus providing genetic diversity heightening long-term survival and evolutionary fitness. Fitness in humans is principally the domain of a remarkably versatile immune system marked by somatic hypermutations (SHM) in immunoglobulin variable (IgV) regions that ensure antibody (Ab) diversity. AID initiates SHM by deaminating C → U, favoring hot WRC (W = A/T, R = A/G) motifs. Since there are large numbers of trinucleotide motif targets throughout IgV, AID must exercise considerable catalytic restraint to avoid attacking such sites repeatedly, which would otherwise compromise diversity. Processive, random, and inefficient AID-catalyzed dC deamination simulates salient features of SHM, yet generates B-cell lymphomas when working at the wrong time in the wrong place. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 57:421-434, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mutations for Worse or Better: Low-Fidelity DNA Synthesis by SOS DNA Polymerase V Is a Tightly Regulated Double-Edged Sword

1953, the year of Watson and Crick, bore witness to a less acclaimed yet highly influential discovery. Jean Weigle demonstrated that upon infection of Escherichia coli, λ phage deactivated by UV radiation, and thus unable to form progeny, could be reactivated by irradiation of the bacterial host. Evelyn Witkin and Miroslav Radman later revealed the presence of the SOS regulon. The more than 40 regulon genes are repressed by LexA protein and induced by the coproteolytic cleavage of LexA, catalyzed by RecA protein bound to single-stranded DNA, the RecA* nucleoprotein filament. Several SOS-induced proteins are engaged in repairing both cellular and extracellular damaged DNA. There's no "free lunch", however, because error-free repair is accompanied by error-prone translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), involving E. coli DNA polymerase V (UmuD'2C) and RecA*. This review describes the biochemical mechanisms of pol V-mediated TLS. pol V is active only as a mutasomal complex, pol V Mut = UmuD'2C-RecA-ATP. RecA* donates a single RecA subunit to pol V. We highlight three recent insights. (1) pol V Mut has an intrinsic DNA-dependent ATPase activity that governs polymerase binding and dissociation from DNA. (2) Active and inactive states of pol V Mut are determined at least in part by the distinct interactions between RecA and UmuC. (3) pol V is activated by RecA*, not at a blocked replisome, but at the inner cell membrane.

Translesion DNA Synthesis

All living organisms are continually exposed to agents that damage their DNA, which threatens the integrity of their genome. As a consequence, cells are equipped with a plethora of DNA repair enzymes to remove the damaged DNA. Unfortunately, situations nevertheless arise where lesions persist, and these lesions block the progression of the cell's replicase. In these situations, cells are forced to choose between recombination-mediated "damage avoidance" pathways or a specialized DNA polymerase (pol) to traverse the blocking lesion. The latter process is referred to as Translesion DNA Synthesis (TLS). As inferred by its name, TLS not only results in bases being (mis)incorporated opposite DNA lesions but also bases being (mis)incorporated downstream of the replicase-blocking lesion, so as to ensure continued genome duplication and cell survival. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium possess five DNA polymerases, and while all have been shown to facilitate TLS under certain experimental conditions, it is clear that the LexA-regulated and damage-inducible pols II, IV, and V perform the vast majority of TLS under physiological conditions. Pol V can traverse a wide range of DNA lesions and performs the bulk of mutagenic TLS, whereas pol II and pol IV appear to be more specialized TLS polymerases.

The discovery of error-prone DNA polymerase V and its unique regulation by RecA and ATP

My career pathway has taken a circuitous route, beginning with a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from The Johns Hopkins University, followed by five postdoctoral years in biology at Hopkins and culminating in a faculty position in biological sciences at the University of Southern California. My startup package in 1973 consisted of $2,500, not to be spent all at once, plus an ancient Packard scintillation counter that had a series of rapidly flashing light bulbs to indicate a radioactive readout in counts/minute. My research pathway has been similarly circuitous. The discovery of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V (pol V) began with an attempt to identify the mutagenic DNA polymerase responsible for copying damaged DNA as part of the well known SOS regulon. Although we succeeded in identifying a DNA polymerase, one that was induced as part of the SOS response, we actually rediscovered DNA polymerase II, albeit in a new role. A decade later, we discovered a new polymerase, pol V, whose activity turned out to be regulated by bound molecules of RecA protein and ATP. This Reflections article describes our research trajectory, includes a review of key features of DNA damage-induced SOS mutagenesis leading us to pol V, and reflects on some of the principal researchers who have made indispensable contributions to our efforts.

Translesion DNA polymerases

Living cells are continually exposed to DNA-damaging agents that threaten their genomic integrity. Although DNA repair processes rapidly target the damaged DNA for repair, some lesions nevertheless persist and block genome duplication by the cell's replicase. To avoid the deleterious consequence of a stalled replication fork, cells use specialized polymerases to traverse the damage. This process, termed "translesion DNA synthesis" (TLS), affords the cell additional time to repair the damage before the replicase returns to complete genome duplication. In many cases, this damage-tolerance mechanism is error-prone, and cell survival is often associated with an increased risk of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Despite being tightly regulated by a variety of transcriptional and posttranslational controls, the low-fidelity TLS polymerases also gain access to undamaged DNA where their inaccurate synthesis may actually be beneficial for genetic diversity and evolutionary fitness.

Critical amino acids in Escherichia coli UmuC responsible for sugar discrimination and base-substitution fidelity

The active form of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V responsible for damage-induced mutagenesis is a multiprotein complex (UmuD′₂C-RecA-ATP), called pol V Mut. Optimal activity of pol V Mut in vitro is observed on an SSB-coated single-stranded circular DNA template in the presence of the β/γ complex and a transactivated RecA nucleoprotein filament, RecA*. Remarkably, under these conditions, wild-type pol V Mut efficiently incorporates ribonucleotides into DNA. A Y11A substitution in the ‘steric gate’ of UmuC further reduces pol V sugar selectivity and converts pol V Mut into a primer-dependent RNA polymerase that is capable of synthesizing long RNAs with a processivity comparable to that of DNA synthesis. Despite such properties, Y11A only promotes low levels of spontaneous mutagenesis in vivo. While the Y11F substitution has a minimal effect on sugar selectivity, it results in an increase in spontaneous mutagenesis. In comparison, an F10L substitution increases sugar selectivity and the overall fidelity of pol V Mut. Molecular modeling analysis reveals that the branched side-chain of L10 impinges on the benzene ring of Y11 so as to constrict its movement and as a consequence, firmly closes the steric gate, which in wild-type enzyme fails to guard against ribonucleoside triphosphates incorporation with sufficient stringency.

A new model for SOS-induced mutagenesis: how RecA protein activates DNA polymerase V

In Escherichia coli, cell survival and genomic stability after UV radiation depends on repair mechanisms induced as part of the SOS response to DNA damage. The early phase of the SOS response is mostly dominated by accurate DNA repair, while the later phase is characterized with elevated mutation levels caused by error-prone DNA replication. SOS mutagenesis is largely the result of the action of DNA polymerase V (pol V), which has the ability to insert nucleotides opposite various DNA lesions in a process termed translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Pol V is a low-fidelity polymerase that is composed of UmuD'(2)C and is encoded by the umuDC operon. Pol V is strictly regulated in the cell so as to avoid genomic mutation overload. RecA nucleoprotein filaments (RecA*), formed by RecA binding to single-stranded DNA with ATP, are essential for pol V-catalyzed TLS both in vivo and in vitro. This review focuses on recent studies addressing the protein composition of active DNA polymerase V, and the role of RecA protein in activating this enzyme. Based on unforeseen properties of RecA*, we describe a new model for pol V-catalyzed SOS-induced mutagenesis.

The active form of DNA polymerase V is UmuD'(2)C-RecA-ATP

DNA-damage-induced SOS mutations arise when Escherichia coli DNA polymerase (pol) V, activated by a RecA nucleoprotein filament (RecA*), catalyses translesion DNA synthesis. Here we address two longstanding enigmatic aspects of SOS mutagenesis, the molecular composition of mutagenically active pol V and the role of RecA*. We show that RecA* transfers a single RecA-ATP stoichiometrically from its DNA 3'-end to free pol V (UmuD'(2)C) to form an active mutasome (pol V Mut) with the composition UmuD'(2)C-RecA-ATP. Pol V Mut catalyses TLS in the absence of RecA* and deactivates rapidly upon dissociation from DNA. Deactivation occurs more slowly in the absence of DNA synthesis, while retaining RecA-ATP in the complex. Reactivation of pol V Mut is triggered by replacement of RecA-ATP from RecA*. Thus, the principal role of RecA* in SOS mutagenesis is to transfer RecA-ATP to pol V, and thus generate active mutasomal complex for translesion synthesis.

Lessons from 50 years of SOS DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis

This historical perspective integrates 50 years of research on SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli with the proverbial '3R' functions--replication, repair and recombination--that feature DNA polymerase V. Genetic and biochemical data are assimilated to arrive at a current picture of UV-damage-induced mutagenesis. An unprecedented DNA polymerase V transactivation mechanism, which involves the RecA protein, sheds new light on unresolved issues that have persisted over time, prompting us to reflect on evolving molecular concepts regarding DNA structures and polymerase-switching mechanisms.

Population dynamics simulations of functional model proteins

In order to probe the fundamental principles that govern protein evolution, we use a minimalist model of proteins to provide a mapping from genotype to phenotype. The model is based on physically realistic forces of protein folding and includes an explicit definition of protein function. Thus, we can find the fitness of a sequence from its ability to fold to a stable structure and perform a function. We study the fitness landscapes of these functional model proteins, that is, the set of all sequences mapped on to their corresponding fitnesses and connected to their one mutant neighbors. Through population dynamics simulations we directly study the influence of the nature of the fitness landscape on evolution. Populations are observed to move to a steady state, the distribution of which can often be predicted prior to the population dynamics simulations from the nature of the fitness landscape and a quantity analogous to a partition function. In this paper, we develop a scheme for predicting the steady-state population on a fitness landscape, based on the nature of the fitness landscape, thereby obviating the need for explicit population dynamics simulations and providing some insight into the impact on molecular evolution of the nature of fitness landscapes. Poor predictions are indicative of fitness landscapes that consist of a series of weakly connected sublandscapes.

Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage

When cells that are actively replicating DNA encounter sites of base damage or strand breaks, replication might stall or arrest. In this situation, cells rely on DNA-damage-tolerance mechanisms to bypass the damage effectively. One of these mechanisms, known as translesion DNA synthesis, is supported by specialized DNA polymerases that are able to catalyse nucleotide incorporation opposite lesions that cannot be negotiated by high-fidelity replicative polymerases. A second category of tolerance mechanism involves alternative replication strategies that obviate the need to replicate directly across sites of template-strand damage.

DNA polymerase V and RecA protein, a minimal mutasome

A hallmark of the Escherichia coli SOS response is the large increase in mutations caused by translesion synthesis (TLS). TLS requires DNA polymerase V (UmuD'2C) and RecA. Here, we show that pol V and RecA interact by two distinct mechanisms. First, pol V binds to RecA in the absence of DNA and ATP and second, through its UmuD' subunit, requiring DNA and ATP without ATP hydrolysis. TLS occurs in the absence of a RecA nucleoprotein filament but is inhibited in its presence. Therefore, a RecA nucleoprotein filament is unlikely to be required for SOS mutagenesis. Pol V activity is severely diminished in the absence of RecA or in the presence of RecA1730, a mutant defective for pol V mutagenesis in vivo. Pol V activity is strongly enhanced with RecA mutants constitutive for mutagenesis in vivo, suggesting that RecA is an obligate accessory factor that activates pol V for SOS mutagenesis.

Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V subunit exchange: a post-SOS mechanism to curtail error-prone DNA synthesis

DNA polymerase V consisting of a heterotrimer composed of one molecule of UmuC and two molecules of UmuD' (UmuD'2C) is responsible for SOS damage-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Here we show that although the UmuD'2C complex remains intact through multiple chromatographic steps, excess UmuD, the precursor to UmuD', displaces UmuD' from UmuD'2C by forming a UmuDD' heterodimer, while UmuC concomitantly aggregates as an insoluble precipitate. Although soluble UmuD'2C is readily detected when the two genes are co-transcribed and translated in vitro, soluble UmuD2C or UmuDD'C are not detected. The subunit exchange between UmuD'2C and UmuD offers a biological means to inactivate error-prone polymerase V following translesion synthesis, thus preventing mutations from occurring on undamaged DNA.

Error-prone repair DNA polymerases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

DNA repair is crucial to the well-being of all organisms from unicellular life forms to humans. A rich tapestry of mechanistic studies on DNA repair has emerged thanks to the recent discovery of Y-family DNA polymerases. Many Y-family members carry out aberrant DNA synthesis-poor replication accuracy, the favored formation of non-Watson-Crick base pairs, efficient mismatch extension, and most importantly, an ability to replicate through DNA damage. This review is devoted primarily to a discussion of Y-family polymerase members that exhibit error-prone behavior. Roles for these remarkable enzymes occur in widely disparate DNA repair pathways, such as UV-induced mutagenesis, adaptive mutation, avoidance of skin cancer, and induction of somatic cell hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. Individual polymerases engaged in multiple repair pathways pose challenging questions about their roles in targeting and trafficking. Macromolecular assemblies of replication-repair "factories" could enable a cell to handle the complex logistics governing the rapid migration and exchange of polymerases.

Two distinct modes of RecA action are required for DNA polymerase V-catalyzed translesion synthesis

SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli requires DNA polymerase V (pol V) and RecA protein to copy damaged DNA templates. Here we show that two distinct biochemical modes for RecA protein are necessary for pol V-catalyzed translesion synthesis. One RecA mode is characterized by a strong stimulation in nucleotide incorporation either directly opposite a lesion or at undamaged template sites, but by the absence of lesion bypass. A separate RecA mode is necessary for translesion synthesis. The RecA1730 mutant protein, which was identified on the basis of its inability to promote pol V (UmuD'(2)C)-dependent UV-mutagenesis, appears proficient for the first mode of RecA action but is deficient in the second mode. Data are presented suggesting that the two RecA modes are "nonfilamentous". That is, contrary to current models for SOS mutagenesis, formation of a RecA nucleoprotein filament may not be required for copying damaged DNA templates. Instead, SOS mutagenesis occurs when pol V interacts with two RecA molecules, first at a 3' primer end, upstream of a template lesion, where RecA mode 1 stimulates pol V activity, and subsequently at a site immediately downstream of the lesion, where RecA mode 2 cocatalyzes lesion bypass. We posit that in vivo assembly of a RecA nucleoprotein filament may be required principally to target pol V to a site of DNA damage and to stabilize the pol V-RecA interaction at the lesion. However, it is only a RecA molecule located at the 3' filament tip, proximal to a damaged template base, that is directly responsible for translesion synthesis.

The "tale" of UmuD and its role in SOS mutagenesis

Recently, the Escherichia coli umuD and umuC genes have been shown to encode E. coli's fifth DNA polymerase, pol V (consisting of a heterotrimer of UmuD'(2)C). The main function of pol V appears to be the bypass of DNA lesions that would otherwise block replication by pols I-IV. This process is error-prone and leads to a striking increase in mutations at sites of DNA damage. While the enzymatic properties of pol V are now only beginning to be fully appreciated, a great deal is known about how E. coli regulates the intracellular levels of the Umu proteins so that the lesion-bypassing activity of pol V is available to help cells survive the deleterious consequences of DNA damage, yet keeps any unwarranted activity on undamaged templates to a minimum. Our review summarizes the multiple restrictions imposed upon pol V, so as to limit its activity in vivo and, in particular, highlights the pivotal role that the N-terminal tail of UmuD plays in regulating SOS mutagenesis.

Replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli involving pols II, III, V, PriA, RecA and RecFOR proteins

In Escherichia coli, UV-irradiated cells resume DNA synthesis after a transient inhibition by a process called replication restart. To elucidate the role of several key proteins involved in this process, we have analysed the time dependence of replication restart in strains carrying a combination of mutations in lexA, recA, polB (pol II), umuDC (pol V), priA, dnaC, recF, recO or recR. We find that both pol II and the origin-independent primosome-assembling function of PriA are essential for the immediate recovery of DNA synthesis after UV irradiation. In their absence, translesion replication or 'replication readthrough' occurs approximately 50 min after UV and is pol V-dependent. In a wild-type, lexA+ background, mutations in recF, recO or recR block both pathways. Similar results were obtained with a lexA(Def) recF strain. However, lexA(Def) recO or lexA(Def) recR strains, although unable to facilitate PriA-pol II-dependent restart, were able to perform pol V-dependent readthrough. The defects in restart attributed to mutations in recF, recO or recR were suppressed in a recA730 lexA(Def) strain expressing constitutively activated RecA (RecA*). Our data suggest that in a wild-type background, RecF, O and R are important for the induction of the SOS response and the formation of RecA*-dependent recombination intermediates necessary for PriA/Pol II-dependent replication restart. In con-trast, only RecF is required for the activation of RecA that leads to the formation of pol V (UmuD'2C) and facilitates replication readthrough.

Roles of DNA polymerases V and II in SOS-induced error-prone and error-free repair in Escherichia coli

DNA polymerase V, composed of a heterotrimer of the DNA damage-inducible UmuC and UmuD(2)(') proteins, working in conjunction with RecA, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein (SSB), beta sliding clamp, and gamma clamp loading complex, are responsible for most SOS lesion-targeted mutations in Escherichia coli, by catalyzing translesion synthesis (TLS). DNA polymerase II, the product of the damage-inducible polB (dinA ) gene plays a pivotal role in replication-restart, a process that bypasses DNA damage in an error-free manner. Replication-restart takes place almost immediately after the DNA is damaged (approximately 2 min post-UV irradiation), whereas TLS occurs after pol V is induced approximately 50 min later. We discuss recent data for pol V-catalyzed TLS and pol II-catalyzed replication-restart. Specific roles during TLS for pol V and each of its accessory factors have been recently determined. Although the precise molecular mechanism of pol II-dependent replication-restart remains to be elucidated, it has recently been shown to operate in conjunction with RecFOR and PriA proteins.

A new class of errant DNA polymerases provides candidates for somatic hypermutation

The mechanism of somatic hypermutation of the immunoglobulin genes remains a mystery after nearly 30 years of intensive research in the field. While many clues to the process have been discovered in terms of the genetic elements required in the immunoglobulin genes, the key enzymatic players that mediate the introduction of mutations into the variable region are unknown. The recent wave of newly discovered eukaryotic DNA polymerases have given a fresh supply of potential candidates and a renewed vigour in the search for the elusive mutator factor governing affinity maturation. In this paper, we discuss the relevant genetic and biochemical evidence known to date regarding both somatic hypermutation and the new DNA polymerases and address how the two fields can be brought together to identify the strongest candidates for further study. In particular we discuss evidence for the in vitro biochemical misincorporation properties of human Rad30B/Pol iota and how it compares to the in vivo somatic hypermutation spectra.

A model for SOS-lesion-targeted mutations in Escherichia coli

The UmuD'2C protein complex (Escherichia coli pol V) is a low-fidelity DNA polymerase (pol) that copies damaged DNA in the presence of RecA, single-stranded-DNA binding protein (SSB) and the beta,gamma-processivity complex of E. coli pol III (ref. 4). Here we propose a model to explain SOS-lesion-targeted mutagenesis, assigning specific biochemical functions for each protein during translesion synthesis. (SOS lesion-targeted mutagenesis occurs when pol V is induced as part of the SOS response to DNA damage and incorrectly incorporates nucleotides opposite template lesions.) Pol V plus SSB catalyses RecA filament disassembly in the 3' to 5' direction on the template, ahead of the polymerase, in a reaction that does not involve ATP hydrolysis. Concurrent ATP-hydrolysis-driven filament disassembly in the 5' to 3' direction results in a bidirectional stripping of RecA from the template strand. The bidirectional collapse of the RecA filament restricts DNA synthesis by pol V to template sites that are proximal to the lesion, thereby minimizing the occurrence of untargeted mutations at undamaged template sites.

Artificial and epigenetic regulation of the I factor, a nonviral retrotransposon of Drosophila melanogaster

The I factor (IF) is a LINE-like transposable element from Drosophila melanogaster. IF is silenced in most strains, but under special circumstances its transposition can be induced and correlates with the appearance of a syndrome of female sterility called hybrid dysgenesis. To elucidate the relationship between IF expression and female sterility, different transgenic antisense and/or sense RNAs homologous to the IF ORF1 have been expressed. Increasing the transgene copy number decreases both the expression of an IF-lacZ fusion and the intensity of the female sterile phenotype, demonstrating that IF expression is correlated with sterility. Some transgenes, however, exert their repressive abilities not only through a copy number-dependent zygotic effect, but also through additional maternal and paternal effects that may be induced at the DNA and/or RNA level. Properties of the maternal effect have been detailed: (1) it represses hybrid dysgenesis more efficiently than does the paternal effect; (2) its efficacy increases with both the transgene copy number and the aging of sterile females; (3) it accumulates slowly over generations after the transgene has been established; and (4) it is maintained for at least two generations after transgene removal. Conversely, the paternal effect increases only with female aging. The last two properties of the maternal effect and the genuine existence of a paternal effect argue for the occurrence, in the IF regulation pathway, of a cellular memory transmitted through mitosis, as well as through male and female meiosis, and akin to epigenetic phenomena.

The expanding polymerase universe

Over the past year, the number of known prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA polymerases has exploded. Many of these newly discovered enzymes copy aberrant bases in the DNA template over which 'respectable' polymerases fear to tread. The next step is to unravel their functions, which are thought to range from error-prone copying of DNA lesions, somatic hypermutation and avoidance of skin cancer, to restarting stalled replication forks and repairing double-stranded DNA breaks.

In vivo technique for determining transcriptional mutagenesis

When an elongating RNA polymerase encounters DNA damage on the template strand of a transcribed gene it can either be arrested by or be transcribed through the lesion. Lesions that arrest RNA polymerases are thought to be subject to transcription-coupled repair, whereas that damage that is bypassed can cause miscoding, resulting in "mutations" in the transcript (transcriptional mutagenesis). We have developed a technique using a plasmid-based luciferase reporter assay to determine the extent to which a particular type of DNA base modification is capable of causing transcriptional mutagenesis in vivo. The system uses Escherichia coli strains with different DNA repair backgrounds and is designed to detect phenotypic changes caused by transcriptional mutagenesis under nongrowth conditions. In addition, this method is capable of indicating the extent to which a particular DNA repair enzyme (or pathway) suppresses the occurrence of transcriptional mutagenesis. Thus, this technique provides a tool with which the effects of various genes on non-replication-dependent pathways resulting in the generation of mutant proteins can be gauged.

Coping with replication 'train wrecks' in Escherichia coli using Pol V, Pol II and RecA proteins

DNA replication machineries tend to stall when confronted with damaged DNA template sites, causing the biochemical equivalent of a major 'train wreck'. A newly discovered bacterial DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli Pol V, acting in conjunction with the RecA protein, can exchange places with the stalled replicative Pol III core and catalyse 'error-prone' translesion synthesis. In contrast to Pol V-catalysed 'brute-force, sloppier copying', another SOS-induced DNA polymerase, Pol II, plays a pivotal role in an 'error-free', replication-restart DNA repair pathway and probably involves RecA-mediated homologous recombination.

Sloppier copier DNA polymerases involved in genome repair

When chromosomal replication is impeded in the presence of DNA damage, members of a newly discovered UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily of procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerases catalyze translesion synthesis at blocked replication forks. Although these polymerases share sequence elements essentially unrelated to the standard replication and repair enzymes, some of them (such as the SOS-induced Escherichia coli pol V) catalyze 'error-prone' translesion synthesis leading to large increases in mutation, whereas others (an example being the Xeroderma pigmentosum variant gene product XPV pol eta) carry out aberrant, yet nonmutagenic translesion synthesis. Ongoing studies of these low fidelity polymerases could provide new insights into the mechanism of somatic hypermutation, a key element in the immune response.

Visualization of two binding sites for the Escherichia coli UmuD'(2)C complex (DNA pol V) on RecA-ssDNA filaments

The heterotrimeric UmuD'(2)C complex of Escherichia coli has recently been shown to possess intrinsic DNA polymerase activity (DNA pol V) that facilitates error-prone translesion DNA synthesis (SOS mutagenesis). When overexpressed in vivo, UmuD'(2)C also inhibits homologous recombination. In both activities, UmuD'(2)C interacts with RecA nucleoprotein filaments. To examine the biochemical and structural basis of these reactions, we have analyzed the ability of the UmuD'(2)C complex to bind to RecA-ssDNA filaments in vitro. As estimated by a gel retardation assay, binding saturates at a stoichiometry of approximately one complex per two RecA monomers. Visualized by cryo-electron microscopy under these conditions, UmuD'(2)C is seen to bind uniformly along the filaments, such that the complexes are completely submerged in the deep helical groove. This mode of binding would impede access to DNA in a RecA filament, thus explaining the ability of UmuD'(2)C to inhibit homologous recombination. At sub-saturating binding, the distribution of UmuD'(2)C complexes along RecA-ssDNA filaments was characterized by immuno-gold labelling with anti-UmuC antibodies. These data revealed preferential binding at filament ends (most likely, at one end). End-specific binding is consistent with genetic models whereby such binding positions the UmuD'(2)C complex (pol V) appropriately for its role in SOS mutagenesis.

Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda

Although homologous recombination and DNA repair phenomena in bacteria were initially extensively studied without regard to any relationship between the two, it is now appreciated that DNA repair and homologous recombination are related through DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, two-strand DNA damage, generated mostly during replication on a template DNA containing one-strand damage, is repaired by recombination with a homologous intact duplex, usually the sister chromosome. The two major types of two-strand DNA lesions are channeled into two distinct pathways of recombinational repair: daughter-strand gaps are closed by the RecF pathway, while disintegrated replication forks are reestablished by the RecBCD pathway. The phage lambda recombination system is simpler in that its major reaction is to link two double-stranded DNA ends by using overlapping homologous sequences. The remarkable progress in understanding the mechanisms of recombinational repair in E. coli over the last decade is due to the in vitro characterization of the activities of individual recombination proteins. Putting our knowledge about recombinational repair in the broader context of DNA replication will guide future experimentation.

The bacteriophage P1 HumD protein is a functional homolog of the prokaryotic UmuD'-like proteins and facilitates SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli umuD and umuC genes comprise an operon and encode proteins that are involved in the mutagenic bypass of normally replication-inhibiting DNA lesions. UmuD is, however, unable to function in this process until it undergoes a RecA-mediated cleavage reaction to generate UmuD'. Many homologs of umuDC have now been identified. Most are located on bacterial chromosomes or on broad-host-range R plasmids. One such putative homolog, humD (homolog of umuD) is, however, found on the bacteriophage P1 genome. Interestingly, humD differs from other umuD homologs in that it encodes a protein similar in size to the posttranslationally generated UmuD' protein and not UmuD, nor is it in an operon with a cognate umuC partner. To determine if HumD is, in fact, a bona fide homolog of the prokaryotic UmuD'-like mutagenesis proteins, we have analyzed the ability of HumD to complement UmuD' functions in vivo as well as examined HumD's physical properties in vitro. When expressed from a high-copy-number plasmid, HumD restored cellular mutagenesis and increased UV survival to normally nonmutable recA430 lexA(Def) and UV-sensitive DeltaumuDC recA718 lexA(Def) strains, respectively. Complementing activity was reduced when HumD was expressed from a low-copy-number plasmid, but this observation is explained by immunoanalysis which indicates that HumD is normally poorly expressed in vivo. In vitro analysis revealed that like UmuD', HumD forms a stable dimer in solution and is able to interact with E. coli UmuC and RecA nucleoprotein filaments. We conclude, therefore, that bacteriophage P1 HumD is a functional homolog of the UmuD'-like proteins, and we speculate as to the reasons why P1 might require the activity of such a protein in vivo.

A phenotype for enigmatic DNA polymerase II: a pivotal role for pol II in replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli

DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli is inhibited transiently after UV irradiation. Induced replisome reactivation or "replication restart" occurs shortly thereafter, allowing cells to complete replication of damaged genomes. At the present time, the molecular mechanism underlying replication restart is not understood. DNA polymerase II (pol II), encoded by the dinA (polB) gene, is induced as part of the global SOS response to DNA damage. Here we show that pol II plays a pivotal role in resuming DNA replication in cells exposed to UV irradiation. There is a 50-min delay in replication restart in mutant cells lacking pol II. Although replication restart appears normal in DeltaumuDC strains containing pol II, the restart process is delayed for >90 min in cells lacking both pol II and UmuD'(2)C. Because of the presence of pol II, a transient replication-restart burst is observed in a "quick-stop" temperature-sensitive pol III mutant (dnaE486) at nonpermissive temperature. However, complete recovery of DNA synthesis requires the concerted action of both pol II and pol III. Our data demonstrate that pol II and UmuD'(2)C act in independent pathways of replication restart, thereby providing a phenotype for pol II in the repair of UV-damaged DNA.

An NMR and conformational investigation of the trans-syn cyclobutane photodimers of dUpdT

Both trans-syn cyclobutane-type photodimers of 2'-deoxyuridylyl (3'-5') thymidine (dUpdT) were formed by deamination of the corresponding trans-syn cyclobutane photodimers of 2'-deoxycytidylyl (3'-5') thymidine (dCpdT) and were examined by 1H-, 13C-, and 31P-nmr spectroscopy. One- and two-dimensional nmr experiments provided a nearly complete assignment of the 1H, 13C, and 31P resonances. Scalar and nuclear Overhauser effect contacts were used to determine the conformation of the deoxyribose rings, exocyclic bonds, cyclobutane rings, and glycosidic linkages. Isomer I (S-type class; CB-; SYN-ANTI) and isomer II (N-type class; CB+; ANTI-SYN) exhibit markedly different conformational features. 31P chemical shifts show that the relative flexibility is dUpdT > isomer II > isomer I. The conformations of these species are very similar to those of other previously examined trans-syn photodimers. Among bipyrimidine photodimers of a given diastereomeric form (i.e., trans-syn I or II), the nmr-derived conformational parameters are nearly invariant, regardless of base substitution pattern. This contrasts with the substituent-dependent variation of cyclobutane ring conformation observed by Kim et al. (Biopolymers, 1993, Vol. 33, pp. 713-721) for an analogous series of cis-syn photodimers. Steric crowding of cyclobutane ring substituents is offered as an explanation for the difference in substituent effects between the families of cis-syn and trans-syn photodimers.

Phenotypic change caused by transcriptional bypass of uracil in nondividing cells

Cytosine deamination to uracil occurs frequently in cellular DNA. In vitro, RNA polymerase efficiently inserts adenine opposite to uracil, resulting in G to A base substitutions. In vivo, uracil could potentially alter transcriptional fidelity, resulting in production of mutant proteins. This study demonstrates that in nondividing Escherichia coli cells, a DNA template base replaced with uracil in a stop codon in the firefly luciferase gene results in conversion of inactive to active luciferase. The level of transcriptional base substitution is dependent on the capacity to repair uracil. These results provide evidence for a DNA damage-dependent, transcription-driven pathway for generating mutant proteins in nondividing cells.

Modulation of RecA nucleoprotein function by the mutagenic UmuD'C protein complex

The RecA, UmuC, and UmuD' proteins are essential for error-prone, replicative bypass of DNA lesions. Normally, RecA protein mediates homologous pairing of DNA. We show that purified Umu(D')2C blocks this recombination function. Biosensor measurements establish that the mutagenic complex binds to the RecA nucleoprotein filament with a stoichiometry of one Umu(D')2C complex for every two RecA monomers. Furthermore, Umu(D')2C competitively inhibits LexA repressor cleavage but not ATPase activity, implying that Umu(D')2C binds in or proximal to the helical groove of the RecA nucleoprotein filament. This binding reduces joint molecule formation and even more severely impedes DNA heteroduplex formation by RecA protein, ultimately blocking all DNA pairing activity and thereby abridging participation in recombination function. Thus, Umu(D')2C restricts the activities of the RecA nucleoprotein filament and presumably, in this manner, recruits it for mutagenic repair function. This modulation by Umu(D')2C is envisioned as a key event in the transition from a normal mode of genomic maintenance by "error-free" recombinational repair, to one of "error-prone" DNA replication.

Radioprotective effect of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC) and S-2-aminoethyl-isothioronicadenosin-5-triphosphate (adeturon) in gamma-irradiated Escherichia coli cells

The effect of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC) and S-2-aminoethyl-isothiouronicadenosin-5-triphosphate (adeturon) in the induction of Escherichia coli SOS response promoted by gamma-irradiation was studied by measuring the induction of sulA gene and the induction of lambda prophage. Furthermore, as a way of measure the exonuclease activity in gamma-irradiated cells in the presence or absence of both compounds, the DNA degradation was determined. Adeturon did not affected DNA degradation, but inhibited the induction of the SOS functions studied. On the contrary, DDC inhibited DNA degradation as well as the induction of the sulA gene, but enhanced lambda induction in E. coli lysogenic strains. These results indicate that both compounds diminish the DNA damage produced by gamma-irradiation and also suggest that the mechanisms of radioprotection must be different. Thus, radioprotection mediated by DDC should involve free hydroxyl radical scavenging and a minor activity of exonuclease. The enhancement of phage induction in E. coli cells that DDC produces could be attributed to its quelant effect and this would not be not probably directly related to radioprotection. Adeturon, as thiols, may serve also as scavenging agent of free hydroxyl radicals, diminishing indirectly the DNA damage level. In addition, adeturon must interact with DNA in the same form that other aminothiol compounds do it. This interaction, mediated by amino groups of adeturon, may serve to concentrate these compounds near of the DNA damage site, increasing the potential for the thiol portion of the molecule to donate hydrogen, decreasing the damage level on DNA molecule. However, adeturon do not modify the exonuclease activity. Some topic about the possible clinical application of both compounds are discussed.

Specific RecA amino acid changes affect RecA-UmuD'C interaction

The UmuD'C mutagenesis complex accumulates slowly and parsimoniously after a 12 Jm(-2) UV flash to attain after 45 min a low cell concentration between 15 and 60 complexes. Meanwhile, RecA monomers go up to 72,000 monomers. By contrast, when the UmuD'C complex is constitutively produced at a high concentration, it inhibits recombinational repair and then markedly reduces bacterial survival from DNA damage. We have isolated novel recA mutations that enable RecA to resist UmuD'C recombination inhibition. The mutations, named recA [UmuR], are located on the RecA three-dimensional structure at three sites: (i) the RecA monomer tail domain (four amino acid changes); (ii) the RecA monomer head domain (one amino acid change, which appears to interface with the amino acids in the tail domain); and (iii) in the core of a RecA monomer (one amino acid change). RecA [UmuR] proteins make recombination more efficient in the presence of UmuD'C while SOS mutagenesis is inhibited. The UmuR amino acid changes are located at a head-tail joint between RecA monomers and some are free to possibly interact with UmuD'C at the tip of a RecA polymer. These two RecA structures may constitute possible sites to which the UmuD'C complex might bind, hampering homologous recombination and favouring SOS mutagenesis.

A broadening view of recombinational DNA repair in bacteria

Recombinational DNA repair is both the most complex and least understood of DNA repair pathways. In bacterial cells grown under normal laboratory conditions (without a DNA damaging treatment other than an aerobic environment), a substantial number (10-50%) of the replication forks originating at oriC encounter a DNA lesion or strand break. When this occurs, repair is mediated by an elaborate set of recombinational DNA repair pathways which encompass most of the enzymes involved in DNA metabolism. Four steps are discussed: (i) The replication fork stalls and/or collapses. (ii) Recombination enzymes are recruited to the location of the lesion, and function with nearly perfect efficiency and fidelity. (iii) Additional enzymatic systems, including the phiX174-type primosome (or repair primosome), then function in the origin-independent reassembly of the replication fork. (iv) Frequent recombination associated with recombinational DNA repair leads to the formation of dimeric chromosomes, which are monomerized by the XerCD site-specific recombination system.

Quantitation of the inhibition of Hfr x F- recombination by the mutagenesis complex UmuD'C

The UmuD'C complex and RecA protein are two essential components in mutagenic repair of gaps produced by the replication of damaged DNA. In this process, the UmuD'C complex might help DNA polymerase to synthesize DNA across a lesion. Besides, a RecA polymer wrapping around single-stranded DNA could function as a directional chaperone to target the UmuD'C complex at the lesion. It was shown in our laboratory that the UmuD'C complex prevents homologous recombination and recombinational repair when expressed at elevated levels. To find out whether the UmuD'C complex inhibits recombination by interfering directly with RecA, we measured the kinetics of inhibition of Hfr x F- recombination in F- recipients in which either RecA or UmuD'C were made to vary. The cell concentrations of RecA and UmuD'C proteins were adjusted by having the recA and the umuD'C genes regulated by the arabinose P(BAD) promoter. In the absence of the UmuD'C complex, recombination was a function of RecA concentration and then reached a plateau when the RecA concentration was above 9000 monomers/cell. At a fixed RecA concentration, the yield of Hfr x F- recombinants decreased as a function of the UmuD'C cell concentration. At a given UmuD'C/RecA ratio, recombination inhibition by UmuD'C was reversed by increasing the RecA cell concentration. RecA1730, a mutant protein impaired in the chaperone activity, was insensitive to UmuD'C inhibition. We propose a model accounting for the RecA chaperone function in SOS mutagenesis and for the UmuD'C inhibitory effect on homologous recombination. We suggest that the UmuD'C complex is placed at the tip of a RecA polymer as a result of a treadmilling process. This would position the UmuD'C complex right at a lesion while the capping by UmuD'C would destabilize a RecA polymer and thereby abort the recombination process.

Role of PSO genes in the repair of photoinduced interstrand cross-links and photooxidative damage in the DNA of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Recent progress in elucidating the molecular structure of the PSSO genes PSO2 to PSO7 is presented. Their role in DNA repair and mutagenesis is discussed in the light of the putative proteins encoded in the respective ORFs and with the knowledge of recent progress in biological and biochemical experimentation. The role of the RecA protein in some steps of DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is presented and discussed.

Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription

Chromosome replication in Escherichia coli is normally initiated at oriC, the origin of chromosome replication. E. coli cells possess at least three additional initiation systems for chromosome replication that are normally repressed but can be activated under certain specific conditions. These are termed the stable DNA replication systems. Inducible stable DNA replication (iSDR), which is activated by SOS induction, is proposed to be initiated from a D-loop, an early intermediate in homologous recombination. Thus, iSDR is a form of recombination-dependent DNA replication (RDR). Analysis of iSDR and RDR has led to the proposal that homologous recombination and double-strand break repair involve extensive semiconservative DNA replication. RDR is proposed to play crucial roles in homologous recombination, double-strand break repair, restoration of collapsed replication forks, and adaptive mutation. Constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR) is activated in mhA mutants deficient in RNase HI or in recG mutants deficient in RecG helicase. cSDR is proposed to be initiated from an R-loop that can be formed by the invasion of duplex DNA by an RNA transcript, which most probably is catalyzed by RecA protein. The third form of SDR is nSDR, which can be transiently activated in wild-type cells when rapidly growing cells enter the stationary phase. This article describes the characteristics of these alternative DNA replication forms and reviews evidence that has led to the formulation of the proposed models for SDR initiation mechanisms. The possible interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, DNA repair, and transcription is explored.

Abasic translesion synthesis by DNA polymerase beta violates the "A-rule". Novel types of nucleotide incorporation by human DNA polymerase beta at an abasic lesion in different sequence contexts

The "A-rule" reflects the preferred incorporation of dAMP opposite abasic lesions in Escherichia coli in vivo. DNA polymerases (pol) from procaryotic and eucaryotic organisms incorporate nucleotides opposite abasic lesions in accordance with the A-rule. However, recent in vivo data demonstrate that A is not preferentially incorporated opposite abasic lesions in eucaryotes. Purified human DNA polymerases beta and alpha are used to measure the specificity of nucleotide incorporation at a site-directed tetrahydrofuran abasic lesion, in 8-sequence contexts, varying upstream and downstream bases adjacent to the lesion. Extension past the lesion is measured in 4 sequence contexts, varying the downstream template base. Pol alpha strongly favors incorporation of dAMP directly opposite the lesion. In marked contrast, pol beta violates the A-rule for incorporation directly opposite the lesion. In addition to incorporation taking place directly opposite the lesion, we also analyze misalignment incorporation directed by a template base downstream from the lesion. Lesion bypass by pol beta occurs predominantly by "skipping over" the lesion, by insertion of a nucleotide complementary to an adjacent downstream template site. Misalignment incorporation for pol beta occurs by a novel "dNTP-stabilized" mechanism resulting in both deletion and base substitution errors. In contrast, pol alpha shows no propensity for this type of synthesis. The misaligned DNA structures generated during dNTP-stabilized lesion bypass do not conform to misaligned structures reported previously.

Regulation of SOS mutagenesis by proteolysis

DNA damage-inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli is largely dependent upon the activity of the UmuD (UmuD') and UmuC proteins. The intracellular level of these proteins is tightly regulated at both the transcriptional and the posttranslational levels. Such regulation presumably allows cells to deal with DNA damage via error-free repair pathways before being committed to error-prone pathways. We have recently discovered that as part of this elaborate regulation, both the UmuD and the UmuC proteins are rapidly degraded in vivo. We report here that the enzyme responsible for their degradation is the ATP-dependent serine protease, Lon. In contrast, UmuD' (the posttranslational product and mutagenically active form of UmuD) is degraded at a much reduced rate by Lon, but is instead rapidly degraded by another ATP-dependent protease, ClpXP. Interestingly, UmuD' is rapidly degraded by ClpXP only when it is in a heterodimeric complex with UmuD. Formation of UmuD/UmuD' heterodimers in preference to UmuD' homodimers therefore targets UmuD' protein for proteolysis. Such a mechanism allows cells to reduce the intracellular levels of the mutagenically active Umu proteins and thereby return to a resting state once error-prone DNA repair has occurred. The apparent half-life of the heterodimeric UmuD/D' complex is greatly increased in the clpX::Kan and clpP::Kan strains and these strains are correspondingly rendered virtually UV non-mutable. We believe that these phenotypes are consistent with the suggestion that while the UmuD/D' heterodimer is mutagenically inactive, it still retains the ability to interact with UmuC, and thereby precludes the formation of the mutagenically active UmuD'2C complex.

Development of a method based on alkaline gel electrophoresis for estimation of oxidative damage to DNA in Escherichia coli

A method for estimating DNA strand breakage and subsequent repair based on alkaline gel electrophoresis was developed and tested with isogenic strains of Escherichia coli deficient in DNA repair enzymes. Samples from a cell suspension were removed at 2 min intervals following a 15 min exposure to 20 mmol l-1 H2O2. Catalase was added and the cells were embedded in blocks of low-melting point agarose and lysed. After alkaline gel electrophoresis, photographs of the gels were taken and the relative lengths of the distributions of DNA fragments were measured with a scanner and computer. The lengths were correlated with survival of the cells exposed to H2O2 and with the importance of particular DNA repair enzymes. Alkaline gel electrophoresis appears to be a relatively simple method for analysing the level of H2O2-caused DNA damage and repair in E. coli.

Cellular strategies for accommodating replication-hindering adducts in DNA: control by the SOS response in Escherichia coli

The replication of double-stranded plasmids containing a single adduct was analyzed in vivo by means of a sequence heterology that marks the two DNA strands. The single adduct was located within the sequence heterology, making it possible to distinguish trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) events from damage avoidance events in which replication did not proceed through the lesion. When the SOS system of the host bacteria is not induced, the C8-guanine adduct formed by the carcinogen N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) yields less than 1% of TLS events, showing that replication does not readily proceed through the lesion. In contrast, the deacetylated adduct N-(deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-2-aminofluorene yields approximately 70% of TLS events under both SOS-induced and uninduced conditions. These results for TLS in vivo are in good agreement with the observation that AAF blocks DNA replication in vitro, whereas aminofluorene does so only weakly. Induction of the SOS response causes an increase in TLS events through the AAF adduct (approximately 13%). The increase in TLS is accompanied by a proportional increase in the frequency of AAF-induced frameshift mutations. However, the polymerase frameshift error rate per TLS event was essentially constant throughout the SOS response. In an SOS-induced delta umuD/C strain, both US events and mutagenesis are totally abolished even though there is no decrease in plasmid survival. Error-free replication evidently proceeds efficiently by means of the damage avoidance pathway. We conclude that SOS mutagenesis results from increased TLS rather than from an increased frameshift error rate of the polymerase.

In vivo stability of the Umu mutagenesis proteins: a major role for RecA

The Escherichia coli Umu proteins play critical roles in damage-inducible SOS mutagenesis. To avoid any gratuitous mutagenesis, the activity of the Umu proteins is normally kept to a minimum by tight transcriptional and posttranslational regulation. We have, however, previously observed that compared with an isogenic recA+ strain, the steady-state levels of the Umu proteins are elevated in a recA730 background (R. Woodgate and D. G. Ennis, Mol. Gen. Genet. 229:10-16, 1991). We have investigated this phenomenon further and find that another coprotease-constitutive (recA*) mutant, a recA432 strain, exhibits a similar phenotype. Analysis revealed that the increased steady-state levels of the Umu proteins in the recA* strains do indeed reflect an in vivo stabilization of the proteins. We have investigated the basis for the phenomenon and find that the mutant RecA* protein stabilizes the Umu proteins by not only converting the labile UmuD protein to the much more stable (and mutagenically active) UmuD' protein but by directly stabilizing UmuD' itself. In contrast, UmuC does not appear to be directly stabilized by RecA* but is instead dramatically stabilized in the presence of UmuD'. On the basis of these observations, we suggest that formation of a UmuD'C-RecA*-DNA quaternary complex protects the UmuD'C proteins from proteolytic degradation and as a consequence helps to promote the switch from error-free to error-prone mechanisms of DNA repair.

Analysis of chimeric UmuC proteins: identification of regions in Salmonella typhimurium UmuC important for mutagenic activity

Unlike Escherichia coli, the closely related bacterium Salmonella typhimurium is relatively unresponsive to the mutagenic effects of DNA-damaging agents. Previous experiments have suggested that these phenotypic differences might result from reduced activity of the S. typhimurium UmuC protein. To investigate this possibility, we have taken advantage of the high degree of homology between the UmuC proteins of E. coli and S. typhimurium and have constructed a series of plasmid-encoded chimeric proteins. The possibility that the phenotypic differences might be due to differential expression of the respective UmuC proteins was eliminated by constructing chimeric proteins that retained the first 25 N-terminal amino acids of either of the UmuC proteins (and presumably the same translational signals), but substituting the remaining 397 C-terminal amino acids with the corresponding segments from the reciprocal operon. Constructs expressing mostly E. coli UmuC were moderately proficient for mutagenesis whereas those expressing mostly S. typhimurium UmuC exhibited much lower frequencies of mutation, indicating that the activity of the UmuC protein of S. typhimurium is indeed curtailed. The regions responsible for this phenotype were more precisely localized by introducing smaller segments of the S. typhimurium UmuC protein into the UmuC protein of E. coli. While some regions could be interchanged with few or no phenotypic effects, substitution of residues 212-395 and 396-422 of E. coli UmuC with those from S. typhimurium resulted in reduced mutability, while substitution of residues 26-59 caused a dramatic loss of activity. We suggest, therefore, that the primary cause for the poor mutability of S. typhimurium can be attributed to mutations located within residues 26-59 of the S. typhimurium UmuC protein.