1
|
Cheng Z, Johar A, Lagergren J, Schandl A, Lagergren P. Disease-specific health-related quality of life trajectories up to 15 years after curative treatment for esophageal cancer-a prospective cohort study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7466. [PMID: 38963063 PMCID: PMC11222968 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of distinct long-term disease-specific HRQL trajectories after curative treatment for esophageal cancer and factors associated with such trajectories are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS This population-based and longitudinal cohort study included 425 esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative treatment, including esophagectomy, in Sweden in 2001-2005 and were followed up until 2020, that is, 15-year follow-up. The outcomes were 10 disease-specific HRQL symptoms, measured by the well-validated EORTC QLQ-OES18 questionnaire at 6 months (n = 402 patients), and 3 (n = 178), 5 (n = 141), 10 (n = 92), and 15 years (n = 52) after treatment. HRQL symptoms were examined for distinct trajectories by growth mixture models. Weighted logistic regression models provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for nine factors in relation to HRQL trajectories: age, sex, education, proxy baseline HRQL, comorbidity, tumor histology, chemo(radio)therapy, pathological tumor stage, and postoperative complications. RESULTS Distinct HRQL trajectories were identified for each of the 10 disease-specific symptoms. HRQL trajectories with more symptoms tended to persist or alleviate over time, while trajectories with fewer symptoms were more stable. Eating difficulty had three trajectories: persistently less, persistently moderate, and persistently more symptoms. The OR of having a persistently more eating difficulty trajectory was decreased for adenocarcinoma histology (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.95), and increased for pathological tumor stage III-IV (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 0.99-4.82) and 30-day postoperative complications (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.26-5.12). CONCLUSION Distinct trajectories with long-term persistent or deteriorating disease-specific HRQL symptoms were identified after esophageal cancer treatment. Tumor histology, tumor stage, and postoperative complications may facilitate detection of high-risk patients for unwanted trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Cheng
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska Institutet, Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Asif Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska Institutet, Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and SurgeryKarolinska Institutet, Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical SciencesKing's College LondonUK
| | - Anna Schandl
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska Institutet, Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska Institutet, Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mortensen HR, Populaire P, Hoffmann L, Moeller DS, Appelt A, Nafteux P, Muijs CT, Grau C, Hawkins MA, Troost EGC, Defraene G, Canters R, Clarke CS, Weber DC, Korevaar EW, Haustermans K, Nordsmark M, Gebski V, Achiam MP, Markar SR, Radhakrishna G, Berbee M, Scartoni D, Orlandi E, Doyen J, Gregoire V, Crehange G, Langendijk J, Lorgelly P, Blommenstein HM, Byskov CS, Ehmsen ML, Jensen MF, Freixas GV, Bütof R. Proton versus photon therapy for esophageal cancer - A trimodality strategy (PROTECT) NCT050555648: A multicenter international randomized phase III study of neoadjuvant proton versus photon chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109980. [PMID: 37935284 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H R Mortensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - P Populaire
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Belgium; KU Leuven- University of Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Hoffmann
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - D S Moeller
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - P Nafteux
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Belgium
| | - C T Muijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - C Grau
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M A Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - E G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany
| | - G Defraene
- KU Leuven- University of Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Canters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, the Netherlands
| | - C S Clarke
- Research Dept. of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - D C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - E W Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - K Haustermans
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Belgium; KU Leuven- University of Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Nordsmark
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - M P Achiam
- Dept. Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of General Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Maaike Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | - Gilles Crehange
- PSL Research University, RadiationOncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris/Orsay, France
| | - Johannes Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UniversityMedicalCentreGroningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paula Lorgelly
- University of Auckland, Waipara Taumata Rau, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Hedwig M Blommenstein
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands; Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Camilla S Byskov
- Department of Oncology and Medical physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mai L Ehmsen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Gloria Vilches Freixas
- Maastro Proton Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Christodoulidis G, Kouliou MN, Koumarelas KE, Giakoustidis D, Athanasiou T. Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Upper GI Malignancies. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1910. [PMID: 37763313 PMCID: PMC10532582 DOI: 10.3390/life13091910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) conditions vastly affect each individual's physical, social, and emotional status. The decision-making process by the medical personnel about these patients is currently based on a patient's life quality evaluation scale, HRQL scales. By utilizing HRQL scales, a better understanding of the various surgical and non-surgical treatment options, as well as their long-term consequences, can be achieved. In our study, an organ-based approach is used in an attempt to examine and characterized the effect of upper GI surgery on HRQL. Therefore, HRQL scales' function as a prognostic tool is useful, and the need for future research, the creation of valid training programs, and modern guidelines is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigorios Christodoulidis
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (M.-N.K.); (K.-E.K.)
| | - Marina-Nektaria Kouliou
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (M.-N.K.); (K.-E.K.)
| | - Konstantinos-Eleftherios Koumarelas
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (M.-N.K.); (K.-E.K.)
| | - Dimitris Giakoustidis
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
King E, Algeo N, Connolly D. Feasibility of OptiMaL, a Self-Management Programme for Oesophageal Cancer Survivors. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231185002. [PMID: 37615435 PMCID: PMC10467166 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231185002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is limited availability of self-management interventions for oesophageal cancer survivors at present. This study examined the feasibility of OptiMal, a six-week, self-management programme to improve fatigue, mood and health-related quality of life for oesophageal cancer survivors. METHODS A mixed methods design was used to evaluate the feasibility of OptiMal. The quantitative arm of the study examined changes in the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the EQ-5D-3L, administered prior to OptiMal (T1), immediately following completion of OptiMal (T2), and three months following completion (T3). Qualitative inquiry in the study was guided by a qualitative descriptive approach through focus groups investigating the experiences of group participants, and individual semi-structured interviews at T3. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Two OptiMal programmes were delivered over a six-month period with a total of fourteen individuals who had finished treatment for oesophageal cancer. The attendance rate was 89.3%. Statistically significant reductions were observed in fatigue, difficulty performing usual activities, anxiety and depression at three-month follow-up. Qualitative findings identified acceptability of the content and delivery format of OptiMal. Participants reported applying self-management strategies acquired through OptiMal to increase participation in daily activities and improve their health and well-being. CONCLUSIONS This feasibility study yielded promising results in terms of self-management outcomes for oesophageal cancer survivors following attendance of OptiMal. Larger scale research studies with control groups are warranted to examine the outcomes in a robust manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eilish King
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Naomi Algeo
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre Connolly
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Devaud N, Carroll P. Ongoing Controversies in Esophageal Cancer II. Thorac Surg Clin 2022; 32:553-563. [DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
6
|
Chen C, Zhu D, Zhao Z, Ye X. Quality of life assessment instruments in adult patients receiving home parenteral and enteral nutrition: A scoping review. Nutr Clin Pract 2022; 37:811-824. [PMID: 35235230 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) assessment is important to evaluate the effect of the intervention for patients treated with home parenteral and enteral nutrition (HPEN). The purpose of this scoping review is to describe, evaluate, and recommend QoL instruments used in adult patients receiving HPEN. We used the Arksey and O'Malley framework and performed literature searches in five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to identify possibly relevant articles that focused on QoL of adult patients receiving HPEN. Of the studies that qualify for full-text screening, two independent researchers extracted data. Twenty-seven QoL instruments were identified, consisting of seven generic instruments, 12 disease-specific instruments, and eight therapy-specific instruments. The Short Form-36 was the most widely used generic instrument and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 was the most commonly employed disease-specific instrument. The recently developed therapy-specific tools, NutriQoL and HPN-QoL, were increasingly employed in studies either alone or in combination with other types of instruments. Important aspects of each instrument were summarized to aid clinicians and researchers in selecting an appropriate instrument when measuring the QoL of adult HPEN patients. Findings could also help to identify the necessity to develop new tools or to modify pre-existing ones to measure QoL of HPEN patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chulin Chen
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Dongmei Zhu
- Department of Nursing, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zehua Zhao
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianghong Ye
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Toh Y, Morita M, Yamamoto M, Nakashima Y, Sugiyama M, Uehara H, Fujimoto Y, Shin Y, Shiokawa K, Ohnishi E, Shimagaki T, Mano Y, Sugimachi K. Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Esophagus 2022; 19:47-56. [PMID: 34467435 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-021-00874-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is one of the malignant tumors with the poorest prognosis. Esophagectomy, which is the mainstay of curative-intent treatments, imposes excessive surgical stress on the patients, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates after esophagectomy remain high. On the other hand, the number of survivors after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is increasing due to recent improvements in surgical techniques and multidisciplinary treatments for this cancer. However, esophagectomy still has a great influence on the fundamental aspect of patients' lives, that is, the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), including their physical, emotional, and social functions in the short- and long-term postoperatively. HR-QOL is a multifactorial concept used to assess the symptoms and functional changes caused by the disease itself and treatments from the patients' perspectives. Therefore, assessing the HR-QOL of patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy is becoming increasingly important. However, the status of HR-QOL changes after esophagectomy has not been satisfactorily evaluated, and there is no worldwide consensus as to how the postoperative HR-QOL can be improved. This review aimed to raise awareness of healthcare providers, such as surgeons and nurses, on the importance of HR-QOL in patients with esophageal cancer after curative-intent esophagectomy by providing multifaceted information concerning the short- and long-term HR-QOLs, including the status of changes and the determinants of HR-QOL after esophagectomy, and furthermore, essential points for improvement of HR-QOL after esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Toh
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan.
| | - Masaru Morita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Manabu Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Nakashima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Masahiko Sugiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Hideo Uehara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Yuki Shin
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Keiichi Shiokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
| | - Emi Ohnishi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomonari Shimagaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yohei Mano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Keishi Sugimachi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laskar SG, Sinha S, Singh M, Mummudi N, Mittal R, Gavarraju A, Budrukkar A, Swain M, Agarwal JP, Gupta T, Murthy V, Mokal S, Patil V, Noronha V, Joshi A, Menon N, Prabhash K. Post-cricoid and Upper Oesophagus Cancers Treated with Organ Preservation Using Intensity-modulated Image-guided Radiotherapy: a Phase II Prospective Study of Outcomes, Toxicity and Quality of Life. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:220-229. [PMID: 34872822 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To prospectively examine the outcomes, toxicity and quality of life (QoL) of patients with post-cricoid and upper oesophagus (PCUE) cancers treated with an organ-preservation approach of (chemo)-radiotherapy using intensity-modulated image-guided radiotherapy (IM-IGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS This phase II prospective study was conducted at a tertiary cancer centre from February 2017 to January 2020. Forty patients with squamous cell carcinoma of PCUE of stage T1-3, N0-2, M0 were accrued. Gross exolaryngeal extension/dysfunctional larynx were major exclusion criteria. Patients received 63-66 Gy in once-daily fractions using volumetric modulated arc therapy with daily IGRT. Outcome measures included disease-related outcomes, patterns of failure, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicities, feeding tube dependency and QoL. RESULTS The median follow-up was 22 months. Twenty-six (87.5%) patients had locoregionally advanced disease and 34 (85%) patients received (chemo)-radiotherapy. A complete response was observed in 26 (65%) patients. The 2-year locoregional control, event-free survival and cause-specific survival were 59.6%, 40.2% and 44.8%, respectively. The volume of primary tumour (GTVPvol) exceeding 28 cm3 had inferior overall survival (P = 0.005) on univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis showed GTVPvol and positron emission tomography-computed tomography maximum standardised uptake value to be independently predictive for event-free and overall survival. A feeding tube requirement at presentation was seen in 11 (27.5%) patients, whereas long-term feeding tube dependency at 6 months was seen in 10 (37%) patients. For QoL, a statistical improvement in pain, appetite loss and swallowing was observed over time. CONCLUSION Although the outcomes of PCUE cancers remain dismal, the use of state of the art diagnostic modalities, careful case selection and modern radiotherapy techniques improved outcomes as compared with before in this exclusive analysis of PCUE cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - S Sinha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - M Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - N Mummudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - R Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - A Gavarraju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - A Budrukkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - M Swain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - J P Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - T Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - V Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - S Mokal
- Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - V Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - V Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - A Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - N Menon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - K Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schröder W, Gisbertz SS, Voeten DM, Gutschow CA, Fuchs HF, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Surgical Therapy of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-Current Standards and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5834. [PMID: 34830988 PMCID: PMC8616112 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Transthoracic esophagectomy is currently the predominant curative treatment option for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. The majority of carcinomas present as locally advanced tumors requiring multimodal strategies with either neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy alone. Minimally invasive, including robotic, techniques are increasingly applied with a broad spectrum of technical variations existing for the oncological resection as well as gastric reconstruction. At the present, intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy is the preferred technique of reconstruction (Ivor Lewis esophagectomy). With standardized surgical procedures, a complete resection of the primary tumor can be achieved in almost 95% of patients. Even in expert centers, postoperative morbidity remains high, with an overall complication rate of 50-60%, whereas 30- and 90-day mortality are reported to be <2% and <6%, respectively. Due to the complexity of transthoracic esophagetomy and its associated morbidity, esophageal surgery is recommended to be performed in specialized centers with an appropriate caseload yet to be defined. In order to reduce postoperative morbidity, the selection of patients, preoperative rehabilitation and postoperative fast-track concepts are feasible strategies of perioperative management. Future directives aim to further centralize esophageal services, to individualize surgical treatment for high-risk patients and to implement intraoperative imaging modalities modifying the oncological extent of resection and facilitating surgical reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Schröder
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.G.); (D.M.V.); (M.I.v.B.H.)
| | - Daan M. Voeten
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.G.); (D.M.V.); (M.I.v.B.H.)
| | - Christian A. Gutschow
- Department of General and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Hans F. Fuchs
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.G.); (D.M.V.); (M.I.v.B.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lormans T, de Graaf E, van de Geer J, van der Baan F, Leget C, Teunissen S. Toward a socio-spiritual approach? A mixed-methods systematic review on the social and spiritual needs of patients in the palliative phase of their illness. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1071-1098. [PMID: 33876676 PMCID: PMC8189005 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211010384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients express a variety of needs, some of which are labeled social and spiritual. Without an in-depth exploration of patients' expressions of these needs, it is difficult to differentiate between them and allocate appropriate healthcare interventions. AIM To gain insight into the social and spiritual needs of patients with a life-limiting illness and the distinction between these needs, as found in the research literature. DESIGN A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-aggregation were conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) approach to qualitative synthesis and the PALETTE framework and were reported according to the PRISMA statement. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019133571). DATA SOURCES The search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycInfo. Eligible studies reported social and spiritual needs from the patients' perspective and were published between January 1st 2008 and October 2020. The quality of evidence was assessed using JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. RESULTS Thirty-four studies (19 qualitative, 1 mixed-methods, and 14 quantitative) were included. The five synthesized findings encompassing social and spiritual needs were: being autonomous, being connected, finding and having meaning, having a positive outlook, and dealing with dying and death. CONCLUSION What literature labels as social and spiritual needs shows great similarities and overlap. Instead of distinguishing social from spiritual needs based on patients' linguistic expressions, needs should always be explored in-depth. We propose a socio-spiritual approach that honors and preserves the multidimensionality of patients' needs and enables interdisciplinary teamwork to allocate patient-tailored care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Lormans
- Center of Expertise Palliative Care Utrecht, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Everlien de Graaf
- Center of Expertise Palliative Care Utrecht, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Carlo Leget
- University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia Teunissen
- Center of Expertise Palliative Care Utrecht, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Academic Hospice Demeter, De Bilt, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tytor J, Larsson H, Bove M, Johansson L, Bergquist H. Topically applied mometasone furoate improves dysphagia in adult eosinophilic esophagitis - results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:629-634. [PMID: 33831327 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1906314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Topical corticosteroids are considered a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of using mometasone furoate spray versus placebo on dysphagia and health-related quality of life in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Consecutive, newly diagnosed adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis were randomized and treated with either 200 micrograms of orally administered topical mometasone furoate or placebo 4 times daily for 8 weeks. Symptoms and quality of life were evaluated using questionnaires including the Watson Dysphagia Scale, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Oesophageal Module 18 and the Short Form-36 before and after treatment. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 36) the Watson Dysphagia Scale score after mometasone treatment was reduced by 6.5 (median, p < .01) compared with 0 (median, ns) in the placebo group. The benefit of mometasone over placebo was significant (p < .05). In the per-protocol analysis (n = 33) the Watson Dysphagia Scale score was reduced by 5 (median, p = .01) after mometasone treatment compared with 0 (median, ns) in the placebo group. The advantage of mometasone over the placebo was significant (p < .05). The benefit of using mometasoneas evaluated by the two quality of life questionnaires was, however, insignificant. CONCLUSIONS Our finding suggests that in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, topical mometasone furoate exerts a beneficial effect compared with placebo regarding the main symptom, i.e., dysphagia. A corresponding benefit could not be verified regarding the various quality of life measurements. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Mometasone-furoate for Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis - a Randomized Placebo Controlled Study ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT02113267).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Tytor
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - Helen Larsson
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - Mogens Bove
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - Leif Johansson
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Henrik Bergquist
- Department of ENT/H&N Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reddy CA, Tavakkoli A, Chen VL, Korsnes S, Bedi AO, Carrott PW, Chang AC, Lagisetty KH, Kwon RS, Elmunzer BJ, Orringer MB, Piraka C, Prabhu A, Reddy RM, Wamsteker E, Rubenstein JH. Long-Term Quality of Life Following Endoscopic Therapy Compared to Esophagectomy for Neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:1580-1587. [PMID: 32519141 PMCID: PMC8327124 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06377-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic therapy (ET) and esophagectomy result in similar survival for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but the long-term quality of life (QOL) has not been compared. AIMS We aimed to compare long-term QOL between patients who had undergone ET versus esophagectomy. METHODS Patients were included if they underwent ET or esophagectomy at the University of Michigan since 2000 for the treatment of HGD or T1a EAC. Two validated survey QOL questionnaires were mailed to the patients. We compared QOL between and within groups (ET = 91, esophagectomy = 62), adjusting for covariates. RESULTS The median time since initial intervention was 6.8 years. Compared to esophagectomy, ET patients tended to be older, had a lower prevalence of EAC, and had a shorter duration since therapy. ET patients had worse adjusted physical and role functioning than esophagectomy patients. However, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of having symptoms was significantly less with ET for diarrhea (0.287; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.114, 0.724), trouble eating (0.207; 0.0766, 0.562), choking (0.325; 0.119, 0.888), coughing (0.291; 0.114, 0.746), and speech difficulty (0.306; 0.0959, 0.978). Amongst the ET patients, we found that the number of therapy sessions and need for dilation were associated with worse outcomes. DISCUSSION Multiple measures of symptom status were better with ET compared to esophagectomy following treatment of BE with HGD or T1a EAC. We observed worse long-term physical and role functioning in ET patients which could reflect unmeasured baseline functional status rather than a causal effect of ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanakyaram A Reddy
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Anna Tavakkoli
- Division of Gastroenterology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vincent L Chen
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Sheryl Korsnes
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Aarti Oza Bedi
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Philip W Carrott
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew C Chang
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kiran H Lagisetty
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark B Orringer
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Cyrus Piraka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Anoop Prabhu
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Rishindra M Reddy
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Erik Wamsteker
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Joel H Rubenstein
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li Z, Cheng J, Zhang Y, Wen S, LV H, Xu Y, Zhu Y, Zhang Z, Mu D, Tian Z. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:693-701. [PMID: 33503901 PMCID: PMC7924373 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
This study investigates whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a safe and effective way for patients with resectable esophageal cancer by comparing the short-term quality of life (QOL) after minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy (OE). A total number of 104 patients who underwent esophagectomy from January 2013 to March 2014 were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into two groups (MIE and OE group). Three scoring scales of quality of life were used to evaluate QOL before the operation and at the first, third, sixth and twelfth months after MIE or OE, which consist of Karnofshy performance scale (KPS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment questionnaire QLQC-30 (EORTC QLQC-30) and esophageal cancer supplement scale (OES-18). The MIE group was higher than the OE group in one-year survival rate (92.54% vs. 72.00%). Significant differences between the two groups were observed in intraoperative bleeding volume (158.53 ± 91.07 mL vs. 228.97 ± 109.33 mL, p = 0.001), and the incidence of postoperative pneumonia (33.33% vs. 58.62%, p = 0.018). The KPS of MIE group was significantly higher than the OE group at the first (80 vs. 70, p = 0.004 < 0.05), third (90 vs. 80, p = 0.006 < 0.05), sixth (90 vs. 80, p = 0.007 < 0.05) and twelfth months (90 vs. 80, p = 0.004 < 0.05) after surgery. The QLQC-30 score of MIE group was better than OE group at first and twelfth months after the operation. The OES-18 score of MIE group was significantly better than OE group at first, sixth and twelfth months after surgery. The short-term quality of life in MIE group was better than OE group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Jingge Cheng
- Department of Orthopedics, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China;
| | - Yuefeng Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Shiwang Wen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Huilai LV
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Yanzhao Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Yonggang Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Donghui Mu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
| | - Ziqiang Tian
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China; (Z.L.); (Y.Z.); (S.W.); (H.L.); (Y.X.); (Y.Z.); (Z.Z.); (D.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-18531118000
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Similar Quality of Life and Safety in Patients Receiving Inpatient or Outpatient Chemotherapy: A Focus on Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8:healthcare8040447. [PMID: 33139637 PMCID: PMC7711819 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8040447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) is a particularly important issue for cancer patients. This study was designed to investigate the differences in QoL in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who underwent inpatient chemotherapy (IPCT) or outpatient chemotherapy (OPCT). A total of 107 ESCC patients were enrolled, including 53 patients in the IPCT group and 54 patients in the OPCT group. The widely used and well-validated instruments European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Oesophageal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18) were used to examine the QoL of the two groups. In addition, the differences in adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. The results of QLQ C-30 analysis showed that mean global quality of life scores were similar between IPCT and OPCT groups, as were functional and symptom scales. There were no significant differences in the functional and symptom scales in the analysis of QLQ OES18 either. Most AEs of chemotherapy were grades 1–2, and the majority of patients tolerated the side effects; no statistically significant difference in AEs between these two groups was mentioned. Our study suggests that the health-related QoL and adverse events in ESCC patients who received IPCT or OPCT are similar. OPCT is reasonable and safe in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
15
|
Does it matter how we evaluate HRQOL? Longitudinal comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-OG25 and FACT-E. J Cancer Surviv 2020; 15:641-650. [PMID: 33106994 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00957-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-OG25 and FACT-E compared longitudinally provide similar reflections of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS Eighty-six esophageal cancer patients treated with curative intent, scheduled to complete both questionnaires at baseline and post-treatment time points until 36 months. A generalized estimating equation model utilizing a Gaussian family compared instruments longitudinally. The two-one-sided-test (TOST) method assessed equivalence between the instruments. RESULTS Trajectories for social domain and overall quality of life differed significantly between instruments. Also, FACT-G's functional well-being post-treatment returns to baseline 3-6 months earlier than the EORTC QLQ-C30's role functioning subscale, suggesting measurement of different components. Trajectories for physical and esophageal symptom subscales are similar and are deemed equivalent. Emotional domains are comparable and bear little resemblance to the physical domain trajectories indicating reflection of emotional experience rather than a physical proxy. EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales have a trajectory similar to its physical functioning scale except for the emotional and esophageal symptoms scales. Overall HRQOL in both instruments showed a consistent return to baseline/pre-treatment levels by 6 months post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS Overall HRQOL recovers earlier after curative-intent treatment than previously reported despite persistence of physical symptoms, with a consistent return to pre-treatment levels by 6 months after treatment. This supports the concept that HRQOL is not primarily defined by physical function. Based on this longitudinal comparison, FACT-E provides a more multidimensional assessment of HRQOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Curative intent treatment for esophageal cancer has adverse effects on HRQOL but despite intense treatment, overall HRQOL recovers within 6 months.
Collapse
|
16
|
van den Boorn HG, Stroes CI, Zwinderman AH, Eshuis WJ, Hulshof MCCM, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Sprangers MAG, van Laarhoven HWM. Health-related quality of life in curatively-treated patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 154:103069. [PMID: 32818901 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery and chemoradiotherapy can potentially cure esophageal and gastric cancer patients, although they may impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aim to systemically review and meta-analyze literature to determine the effect of curative treatments on HRQoL in esophageal and gastric cancer.- A systematic search was performed identifying studies assessing HRQoL. Meta-analyses were performed on baseline and subsequent time-points.- From the 6067 articles retrieved, 49 studies were included (61 % low quality). Meta-analyses showed short-term HRQoL differences between esophageal cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (nC(R)T), or surgery alone (p < 0.001), with better HRQoL with nC(R)T and surgery compared to dCRT. Over the course of 12 months, no HRQoL difference was identified between treatments in esophageal cancer (p = 0.633). Esophagectomy, but not gastrectomy, resulted in a clinically relevant decline in HRQoL. No long-term HRQoL differences were identified between curative treatments in esophageal and gastric cancer. More high-quality HRQoL studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor G van den Boorn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte I Stroes
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Aeilko H Zwinderman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wietse J Eshuis
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mirjam A G Sprangers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Klevebro F, Johar A, Lagergren P. Impact of co-morbidities on health-related quality of life 10 years after surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer. BJS Open 2020; 4:601-604. [PMID: 32472656 PMCID: PMC7397362 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated with long‐term decreased health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of co‐morbidities on HRQoL among survivors of oesophageal or gastro‐oesophageal junctional cancers after 10 years or
more. Methods The study included a prospectively collected, population‐based cohort, comprising all patients who had surgery for oesophageal or gastro‐oesophageal junctional cancer in Sweden in 2001–2005 with follow‐up until 31 December 2016. All data regarding patient and tumour characteristics, treatment details and HRQoL were collected using a prospectively created database. Multivariable ANCOVA regression models, adjusting for age, sex, tumour histology, stage and surgical technique, were used to calculate adjusted mean scores with 95 per cent confidence intervals for all HRQoL outcomes. Results A total of 92 survivors (88·5 per cent) responded to the questionnaires. Patients were stratified in two groups according to whether they reported a low or high impact of co‐morbidities on general health. Patients in the high‐impact group had clinically significantly decreased HRQoL and an increased level of symptoms, but differences between these two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion Co‐morbidities with high impact on general health still contribute to impaired HRQoL 10 years after oesophagectomy for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Klevebro
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang Y, Shi J, Du L, Huang H, Wang L, Zhu J, Li H, Bai Y, Liao X, Mao A, Liu G, Ren J, Sun X, Gong J, Zhou Q, Mai L, Zhu L, Xing X, Liu Y, Ren Y, Song B, Lan L, Zhou J, Lou P, Sun X, Qi X, Wu S, Wei W, Zhang K, Dai M, Chen W, He J. Health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer or precancerous lesions assessed by EQ-5D: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Thorac Cancer 2020; 11:1076-1089. [PMID: 32130756 PMCID: PMC7113059 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to obtain a set of health state utility scores of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) and precancerous lesions in China, and to explore the influencing factors of health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods A hospital‐based multicenter cross‐sectional study was conducted. From 2013 to 2014, patients with EC or precancerous lesions were enrolled. HRQoL was assessed using a European quality of life‐5 dimension (EQ‐5D‐3L) instrument. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to explore the influencing factors of the EQ‐5D utility scores. Results A total of 2090 EC patients and 156 precancer patients were included in the study. The dimension of pain/discomfort had the highest rate of self‐reported problems, 60.5% in EC and 51.3% in precancer patients. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for EC and precancer patients were 68.4 ± 0.7 and 64.5 ± 3.1, respectively. The EQ‐5D utility scores for EC and precancer patients were estimated as 0.748 ± 0.009 and 0.852 ± 0.022, and the scores of EC at stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage IV were 0.693 ± 0.031, 0.747 ± 0.014, 0.762 ± 0.015, and 0.750 ± 0.023, respectively. According to the multivariable analyses, the factors of region, occupation, household income in 2012, health care insurance type, pathological type, type of therapy, and time points of the survey were statistically associated with the EQ‐5D utility scores of EC patients. Conclusions There were remarkable decrements of utility scores among esophageal cancer patients, compared with precancer patients. The specific utility scores of EC would support further cost‐utility analysis in populations in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youqing Wang
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jufang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lingbin Du
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Huiyao Huang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Le Wang
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Juan Zhu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huizhang Li
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yana Bai
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xianzhen Liao
- Hunan Office for Cancer Control and Research, Hunan Provincial Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Ayan Mao
- Public Health Information Research Office, Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guoxiang Liu
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Jiansong Ren
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojie Sun
- Center for Health Management and Policy, Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiyong Gong
- Science and Education Department of Public Health Division, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Qi Zhou
- Chongqing Office for Cancer Control and Research, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Ling Mai
- Department of Institute of Tumor Research, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lin Zhu
- Teaching and Research Department, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Xiaojing Xing
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Control and Research, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yuqin Liu
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Center, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ying Ren
- Urban Office of Cancer Early Detection and Treatment, Tieling Central Hospital, Tieling, China
| | - Bingbing Song
- Heilongjiang Office for Cancer Control and Research, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Li Lan
- Institute of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Harbin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin, China
| | - Jinyi Zhou
- Institute of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Control, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
| | - Peian Lou
- Department of Control and Prevention of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases, Xuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xuzhou, China
| | - Xiaohua Sun
- Ningbo Clinical Cancer Prevention Guidance Center, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Xiao Qi
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Shouling Wu
- Health Department of Kailuan Group, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Wenqiang Wei
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Min Dai
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wanqing Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie He
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Persson J, Engström C, Bergquist H, Johnsson E, Smedh U. Validation of instruments for the assessment of dysphagia due to malignancy of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5267100. [PMID: 30596966 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to validate the Watson scale, the Ogilvie scale, and the Goldschmid scale for assessment of dysphagia due to malignancy of the esophagus. After translation of the scales to Swedish, 35 patients with dysphagia due to esophageal malignancy were asked to participate. On day 1, patients were asked to fill in the questionnaires. The patients also kept a food diary for 4 consecutive days, for assessment of actual swallowing ability. On day 10, the patients were asked to fill in the scales again, to control for individual variability. As an external control group, 29 healthy volunteers were asked to fill in the questionnaires once. External validation was done against actual swallowing ability, and against the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scales QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25, which are already validated quality of life scales for malignancy. Reliability in the categorical variables (Ogilvie and Goldschmid) showed weighted kappa values of 0.52 and 0.54, respectively. For the Watson scale and the Dysphagia module of QLQ-OG25, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.68 and 0.80, respectively. Correlations between all scales were good to excellent with values of correlation coefficients (rs) between 0.69 and 0.88, with the strongest correlations between the Ogilvie score and the dysphagia module in QLQ-OG25. These latter two scales had the strongest correlation to the food diary (rs = 0.72). Although the Ogilvie scale was superior, all the three scales showed good reliability and are thus judged to have good validity for assessment of dysphagia due to esophageal malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Persson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
| | - C Engström
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
| | - H Bergquist
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - E Johnsson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
| | - Ulrika Smedh
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sunde B, Klevebro F, Johar A, Johnsen G, Jacobsen AB, Glenjen NI, Friesland S, Lindblad M, Ajengui A, Lundell L, Lagergren P, Nilsson M. Health-related quality of life in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer (NeoRes trial). Br J Surg 2019; 106:1452-1463. [PMID: 31436322 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few data comparing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (nCT) compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS In the NeoRes trial, patients were assigned randomly in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and an infusion of 750 mg per m2 5-fluorouracil over 24 h on days 1-5 in three 21-day cycles (nCT) or the same chemotherapy regimen, but with the addition of 40 Gy radiotherapy (nCRT). HRQoL data were collected at baseline, after neoadjuvant therapy and at 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and disease-specific modules were used. RESULTS Of 181 patients randomized, 165 were included in the analysis of HRQoL. In a direct comparison between the allocated treatments, odynophagia after completion of neoadjuvant therapy but before surgery (P = 0·047) and troublesome coughing at 3 years' follow-up (P = 0·011) were more pronounced in the nCRT arm. In the longitudinal analyses within each treatment arm, a large deterioration in HRQoL was noted at 1 year. Some recovery was seen in both arms over time but, after 3 and 5 years, patients in the nCRT arm reported more symptoms compared with baseline than patients in the nCT arm. CONCLUSION HRQoL after multimodal treatment for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction was impaired and more pronounced in patients who underwent nCRT, with only partial recovery over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Sunde
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Klevebro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Johar
- Department of Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Johnsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - A-B Jacobsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - N I Glenjen
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - S Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Ajengui
- Division of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Lagergren
- Department of Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rosmolen WD, Phoa NKYN, Nieuwkerk PT, Pouw RE, Weusten BLAM, Bisschops R, Schoon EJ, Sprangers MAG, Bergman JJGHM. Impact of ablation of Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia on patients' illness perception and quality of life: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:215-221. [PMID: 31026438 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A previous multicenter randomized trial demonstrated that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) significantly reduced the risk of neoplastic progression compared with surveillance (1.5% vs 26.5%) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and low-grade dysplasia (LGD). In the same population, this study aimed to compare the quality of life (QOL) and illness perception (IP) among patients treated with RFA and patients kept under surveillance. METHODS From June 2007 to June 2011, patients with BE and LGD were randomly assigned to RFA or surveillance. QOL and IP were assessed at baseline, 2, 9, 14, 26, and 38 months. Standardized questionnaires were used (SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-OES18, and the brief Illness Perception Questionnaire [IPQ]). RESULTS Forty-seven patients in the ablation group and 49 patients in the surveillance group completed the questionnaires (median follow-up, 36 months). Marginal differences were observed in the SF-36 and the EORTC-QLQ-C30. Based on the EORTC-QLQ-OES18, the ablation group reported more diarrhea (7.8 vs 4.0; P = .018), whereas the surveillance group reported more reflux (15.1 vs 9.0; P < .001) and more problems with speaking (4.3 vs 2.2; P = .019). The IPQ showed that patients in the ablation group perceived their disease lasted for a shorter period of time (P < .001), experienced fewer symptoms (P < .001), had fewer concerns about their condition (P < .001), and tended to be less emotionally affected by their condition (P = .012) than patients in the surveillance group. As a result, patients who underwent ablation experienced their condition as less threatening compared with patients in the surveillance group (P < .001). CONCLUSION Patients treated with ablation for BE with LGD reported a QOL comparable with that of patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance; however, the patients in the ablation group had fewer concerns and a less-threatening view of their condition. (Clinical trial registration number [www.trialregister.nl]: NTR1198; 25-1-2008.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilda D Rosmolen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine K Y N Phoa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Phytia T Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam A G Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
O'Connell L, Coleman M, Kharyntiuk N, Walsh TN. Quality of life in patients with upper GI malignancies managed by a strategy of chemoradiotherapy alone versus surgery. Surg Oncol 2019; 30:33-39. [PMID: 31500782 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) induces a pathological complete response (pCR) in 25-85% of oesophago-gastric cancer. As surgery entails morbidity and mortality risks and quality of life (QL) impairment, its avoidance in patients without residual disease is desirable. This study aimed to compare quality of life of patients with a cCR who chose surveillance with those who chose surgery. METHODS Four groups of patients were studied. Group 1(n = 31) were controls; Group 2 (n = 26) had chemoradiotherapy only; Group 3 (n = 31) had oesophagectomy after nCRT; Group 4 (n = 26) had gastrectomy alone. A 33-point novel questionnaire was administered at two 3 month time points. Participants were also interviewed with a validated questionnaire. RESULTS Mean(±sd) quality of life scores in cCR patients offered surveillance (28.9 ± 4.5) were superior to patients undergoing oesophagectomy (32.3 ± 58. p=0.042) or gastrectomy (33.19 ± 5.9, p=0.004). This result was replicated in the validated questionnaire (p=0.017). There was a trend towards increased reflux-related respiratory symptoms in the oesophagectomy group (7.3 ± 2.2 vs 6.5 ± 1.9; p=0.396) and towards early dumping (8.2 ± 1.4 vs 7.1 ± 1.; p=0.239) and vagotomy-related symptoms (1.82 ± 0.9 vs 1.4 ± 0.6; p=0.438) in the gastrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS Avoidance of surgery in cCR patients is rewarded with a superior quality of life to those undergoing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren O'Connell
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
| | - Mary Coleman
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
| | - N Kharyntiuk
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
| | - Thomas N Walsh
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Comparison of Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Ivor-Lewis, Mckeown, or Sweet Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:225-231. [PMID: 30298418 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3999-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the long-term quality of life (QoL) in patients after Sweet, Ivor-Lewis, or Mckeown esophagectomy. METHODS Esophageal cancer patients after Sweet, Ivor-Lewis, or Mckeown esophagectomy from 2010 to 2012 were included. QoL was assessed according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer general questionnaire: QLQ-C30 and esophagus-specific questionnaire: QLQ-OES18. RESULTS A total of 126 qualified patients who have been alive for more than 3 years without tumor recurrence were divided into three groups: the Sweet group (n = 40), Ivor-Lewis group (n = 38), and Mckeown group (n = 48). Among these three groups, the QLQ-C30 mean scores of global health status, functional and symptom scales, and general QoL were similar. The symptom scales of QLQ-OSE18 showed that patients who had a Mckeown operation experienced more problem of eating (P = 0.029), choking when swallowing (P = 0.010) and coughing (P = 0.016), while patients undergoing Sweet operation complained more symptom of reflux (P = 0.003) and pain (P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS All three types of esophagectomy provided a generally good long-term QoL. However, patients in Sweet and Mckeown group tend to suffer from a higher symptomatic burden as compared to Ivor-Lewis approach.
Collapse
|
24
|
Sunde B, Johnsen G, Jacobsen AB, Glenjen NI, Friesland S, Lindblad M, Rouvelas I, Wang N, Lundell L, Lagergren P, Nilsson M. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy alone on the relief of dysphagia in esophageal cancer patients: secondary endpoint analysis in a randomized trial. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5063601. [PMID: 30084992 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Dysphagia is the most significant symptom in patients with esophageal cancer. There are different therapeutic interventions designed to relieve dysphagia, but few studies have addressed the effects of neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the effects on dysphagia of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and further to study the association between dysphagia response and histological response. Patient reported swallowing function was a secondary endpoint in the NeoRes trial, in which patients were randomized between neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients completed dysphagia questionnaires before the start and after neoadjuvant therapy, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) esophageal cancer modules QLQ-OES24/OG25. Chirieac tumor regression grade (TRG) was used to assess the histological response. Out of 181 patients were randomized, of whom 87% completed the dysphagia questionnaires before and 73% after neoadjuvant treatment. Patient characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. Among patients reporting dysphagia at baseline, neoadjuvant therapy improved dysphagia in both arms. The mean dysphagia score after neoadjuvant treatment was significantly lower after nCT compared to after nCRT (P = 0.022). The reported dysphagia did not differ between those with a complete histological response (TRG 1) and those without any response at all (TRG 4) (P = 0. 583).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Sunde
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - G Johnsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim
| | - A-B Jacobsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo
| | - N I Glenjen
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - S Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - I Rouvelas
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - N Wang
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Anandavadivelan P, Martin L, Djärv T, Johar A, Lagergren P. Nutrition Impact Symptoms Are Prognostic of Quality of Life and Mortality after Surgery for Oesophageal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10090318. [PMID: 30205530 PMCID: PMC6162430 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10090318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to clarify the influence of nutritional problems after surgery for oesophageal cancer on functional health related quality of life (HRQOL) and survival. A prospective nationwide cohort of oesophageal cancer patients operated 2001–2005 in Sweden with 6 months postoperative follow up was used. Nutritional problems were categorized as low/moderate/severe/very severe based on weight loss and nutrition impact symptoms. An ANCOVA model calculated mean score differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of global quality of life (QOL), social and physical function scores, stratified by preoperative body mass index (BMI) <25 and ≥25. A Cox proportional hazards model produced hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI for overall 5-year survival. Of 358 patients, 196 (55%) had preoperative BMI ≥25. Very severe and severe nutritional problems were associated with worse HRQOL in both BMI groups. E.g. MD’s for global QOL among ‘very severe’ group was −29 (95% CI −39–−19) and −20 (95% CI −29–−11) for <25 and ≥25 BMI, respectively, compared to the ‘low’ group. Overall 5-year survival among ‘very severe’ and BMI ≥ 25 was worse; HR 4.6 (95% CI 1.4–15.6). Intense nutritional problems negatively impact postoperative HRQOL and combined with preoperative BMI ≥ 25 are associated with poorer 5-year overall survival representing a group needing greater clinical attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poorna Anandavadivelan
- Surgical Care Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Lena Martin
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
- Function Area Clinical Nutrition, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Therese Djärv
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Asif Johar
- Surgical Care Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical Care Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Anandavadivelan P, Wikman A, Johar A, Lagergren P. Profiles of patient and tumour characteristics in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0196187. [PMID: 29708994 PMCID: PMC5927451 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Strong deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a major concern in a sub-group of long-term oesophageal cancer survivors. This study aimed to identify potential clustering of patients and tumour variables that predicts such deterioration. Patient and tumour variables were collected in a prospective cohort of patients who underwent surgery for oesophageal cancer in Sweden 2001-2005. Latent cluster analysis identified statistically significant clustering of these variables. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, BMI, tumour stage and marital status was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between patient profiles and HRQOL at 3 and 5 years from surgery. Among 155 included patients at 3 years, three patient profiles were identified: 1) 'reference profile' (males, younger age, employed, upper secondary education, co-habitating, urban dwellers, adenocarcinoma and advanced tumour stage) (n = 47;30%), 2) 'adenocarcinoma profile' (middle age, unemployed/retired, males, low education, co-habitating, adenocarcinoma, advanced tumour stage, tumour in lower oesophagus/cardia, and co-morbidities (n = 79;51%), and 3) 'squamous-cell carcinoma profile' (unemployed/retired, middle-age, males, low BMI, urban dwellers, squamous-cell carcinoma, tumour in upper/middle oesophagus (n = 29;19%). These profiles did not differ regarding most HRQOL measures. Exceptions were the squamous-cell carcinoma profile, reporting more constipation (OR = 5.69; 95%CI: 1.34-24.28) and trouble swallowing saliva (OR = 4.87; 95%CI: 1.04-22.78) and the adenocarcinoma profile reporting more dyspnoea (OR = 2.60; 95%CI: 1.00-6.77) and constipation (OR = 3.31; 95%CI: 1.00-10.97) compared to the reference profile. Three distinct patient profiles were identified but these could not explain the substantial deterioration in HRQOL observed in the sub-sample of survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poorna Anandavadivelan
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Wikman
- Reproductive Health, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Asif Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brunelli C, Mosconi P, Boeri P, Gangeri L, Pizzetti P, Cerrai F, Schicchi A, Apolone G, Tamburini M. Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients with Malignant Dysphagia. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 86:134-8. [PMID: 10855850 DOI: 10.1177/030089160008600205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background In the last 10 years of clinical research there has been increasing interest in the evaluation of quality of life. Several generic and specific instruments have been developed for this purpose. EORTC QLQ C-30 is a cancer-specific questionnaire translated into various languages and validated in several European countries including Italy, where the impact of malignant disease on different areas of quality of life is poorly documented. Methods The EORTC QLQ C-30 was administered to 109 patients referred to the endoscopy division of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, for endoscopic palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia to test its characteristics in terms of acceptability and clinical validity. Results In this group of patients the impact of advanced esophageal cancer was highly evident for Emotional and Physical Functioning, Fatigue and Global QoL scales. Dysphagia is a serious problem for many patients; there is a correlation between grade of dysphagia and four QoL dimensions. Conclusions QoL assessment is an important tool to evaluate the adequate management of patients with esophageal cancer. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire proved to be valid and reliable also in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Brunelli
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Alghamedi A, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan SK, Sulman J, Darling G, Kidane B. Quality of life assessment in esophagectomy patients. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:84. [PMID: 29666807 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Esophagectomy is the mainstay of curative therapy for esophageal cancer; however, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with subsequent major impact on quality of life. This paper reviews the evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in esophageal cancer patients undergoing curative intent therapy, the relationship between postoperative HRQOL and survival as well the potential utility of pre-treatment HRQOL as a prognostic tool. HRQOL assessment is valuable in helping clinicians understand the impact on patients of esophageal cancer and the various treatments thereof. HRQOL is also valuable as an end-point in studies of esophageal cancer and esophageal cancer treatment. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with the various treatments for esophageal cancer, it could be argued that HRQOL is as important an endpoint as survival, if not more so. Patient-reported pre-treatment HRQOL assessment appears to predict survival better than clinician-derived performance status assessment period. HRQOL assessment also appears to be responsive to surgical and non-surgical therapy and thus could potentially be used in trials and in practice to serve that function. Thus, HRQOL assessment could be a potentially important adjunct in shared decision-making and guiding treatment planning as well as monitoring the progress of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alla Alghamedi
- Section of General Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.,Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Gordon Buduhan
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Lawrence Tan
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Joanne Sulman
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gail Darling
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Biniam Kidane
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Anandavadivelan P, Wikman A, Johar A, Lagergren P. Impact of weight loss and eating difficulties on health-related quality of life up to 10 years after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2017; 105:410-418. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2017] [Revised: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Severe weight loss is experienced by patients with eating difficulties after surgery for oesophageal cancer. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to asssess the influence of eating difficulties and severe weight loss on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) up to 10 years after oesophagectomy.
Methods
Data on bodyweight and HRQoL were collected at 6 months, 3, 5 and 10 years in patients who underwent surgery for oesophageal cancer in Sweden between 2001 and 2005. Exposures were percentage weight loss, and eating difficulties defined by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-OES18 questionnaire. Outcomes were HRQoL scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Repeated-measures ANOVA, adjusting for potential confounders, was used to assess the association between eating difficulties and weight loss (4 exposure groups) and HRQoL scores at each time point. Mean score differences (MDs) between time points or exposure groups were defined as clinically relevant in accordance with evidence-based interpretation guidelines.
Results
In total, 92 of 104 10-year survivors (88·5 per cent) responded to the questionnaires. Weight loss was greatest within 6 months of surgery. Patients with eating difficulties with or without weight loss reported clinically and statistically significantly worsened HRQoL in almost all aspects. The largest MD was seen between 5 and 10 years after surgery for global quality of life, physical, role and social function (MD –22 to –30), as well for fatigue, nausea, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss and diarrhoea (MD 24–36).
Conclusion
Eating difficulties are associated with deterioration in several aspects of HRQoL up to 10 years after surgery for oesophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Anandavadivelan
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A. Wikman
- Reproductive Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A. Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P. Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Does Prolonged Enteral Feeding With Supplemental Omega-3 Fatty Acids Impact on Recovery Post-esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2017; 266:720-728. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
31
|
Dai Z, Lang W, Yang H, Tian J, Sun W, Pekbay B, Lin Y, Wang M, Cui B, Yang S, Li H, Luo L, Guo H, Zhang L. Validation of EORTC QLQ-OES18 for Chinese patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30:1-7. [PMID: 28859386 DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability, validity, and acceptability of the Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-OES18 in patients with esophageal cancer. The questionnaire was translated according to the guideline of the EORTC. One hundred and forty-nine patients with esophageal cancer from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital completed the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) and the simplified Chinese EORTC QLQ-C30/OES18 scales during July 2013 to January 2014. The results were statistically analyzed by Cronbach's α coefficient, Spearman correlation test with multiple strengthen analysis, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient) of all four scales (dysphagia, eating, reflux, and pain) was 0.689-0.822, which were satisfactory or near satisfactory. The absolute values of correlation of each scale between EORTC QLQ-OES18 and EORTC QLQ-C30 were 0.002-0.750 while there was no significant difference between groups divided by KPS scores. We confirmed the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-OES18 appears to be a reliable, valid, and acceptable instrument for measuring the health-related quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer in mainland China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Dai
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Department of Endoscopy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - W Lang
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - H Yang
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - J Tian
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - W Sun
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - B Pekbay
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Y Lin
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - M Wang
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - B Cui
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - S Yang
- Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - H Li
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - L Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - H Guo
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - L Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Donohoe CL, Healy LA, Fanning M, Doyle SL, Hugh AM, Moore J, Ravi N, Reynolds JV. Impact of supplemental home enteral feeding postesophagectomy on nutrition, body composition, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30:1-9. [PMID: 28859364 DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this prospective cohort study is to analyze the impact of supplemental home enteral nutrition (HEN) post-esophageal cancer surgery on nutritional parameters, quality of life (QL), and patient satisfaction. A systematic review reported that over 60% of patients lose >10% of both body weight and BMI by 6 months after esophagectomy. Enteral feeding (EF) is increasingly a modern standard postoperatively; however, the impact of extended HEN postdischarge has not been systematically studied. One hundred forty-nine consecutive patients [mean age 62 ± 9, 80% male,76% adenocarcinoma, 66% on multimodal protocols, and 69% with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2] were studied. Jejunal EF commenced day 1 postoperatively, and supplemental overnight HEN (764 kcal; 32g protein) continued on discharge for a planned further 4 weeks. Weight, BMI, and body composition analysis (bioimpedance analysis) were measured at baseline, preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months, along with the EORTC QLQ-C30/OES18 QL measures. A patient satisfaction questionnaire addressed eight key items in relation to HEN (max score 100/item). Median (range) total duration of EF was 49 days (28-96). Overall compliance was 96%. At 6 months, compared with preoperatively, 58 (39%) patients lost >10% weight, with median (IQR) loss of 6.8 (4-9) kg, and 62 (41%) patients lost >10% BMI. Lean body mass and body fat were significantly (p < 0.001) decreased. Mean global QL decreased (p < 0.01) from 82 to 72. A high mean satisfaction score (>70 ± 11/100) was reported, >80 for practical training, activities of daily living, pain, anxiety, recovery and impact on caregivers, with lower scores for appetite (33 ± 24) and sleep (63 ± 30). Supplemental HEN for a minimum of one month postdischarge is associated with high compliance and patient satisfaction. Weight and BMI loss may still be substantial, however this may be less than published literature, in addition the impact on HR-QL may be attenuated. HEN has both subjective and objective rationale and merits further validation toward optimizing nutritional recovery and overall wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L A Healy
- Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin
| | - M Fanning
- Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin
| | - S L Doyle
- Department of Surgery.,School of Biological Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Mc Hugh
- Clinical Nutrition, St. James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Rosmolen WD, Nieuwkerk PT, Pouw RE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bergman JJGHM, Sprangers MAG. Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence after endoscopic treatment for early Barrett's neoplasia: a prospective study. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30:1-9. [PMID: 27766707 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic therapy is the treatment of choice for high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or early cancer (≤T1sm1) in Barrett's esophagus (BE). We prospectively evaluated the effect of endoscopic treatment on quality of life (QOL) and fear of cancer (recurrence) and compared this with the effect of Barrett's surveillance or surgery. Patients treated endoscopically for early Barrett's neoplasia (n = 42, HGIN - T1sm1N0M0) were compared with three groups: patients with non-dysplastic BE undergoing surveillance (n = 44); patients treated surgically for early BE neoplasia (HGIN - T2N0M0, n = 21); patients treated surgically for advanced BE cancer (T1N1M0 - T3N1M0, n = 19). QOL (SF-36; EORTC-QLQ-C30; EORTC-QLQ-OES18) and fear of cancer recurrence (Worry of Cancer Scale [WOCS] and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) were measured at baseline, 2 and 6 months after treatment. The endoscopic treatment group reported significantly better QOL in both physical and mental scales of SF-36 and EORTC-QLQ-C30 and less esophageal cancer related symptoms compared to both surgical groups. The endoscopic treatment group reported significant more worry for cancer recurrence (WOCS) compared to the early surgical group. Their scores on the WOCS were comparable with the scores of the advanced surgical group. Endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancer has less negative impact on QOL and esophageal cancer symptoms than surgery. However, endoscopically treated patients worry as much about cancer recurrence as patients treated surgically for advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilda D Rosmolen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pythia T Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam A G Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh. Surg Endosc 2017; 31:3673-3680. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5405-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
36
|
Problems and needs in patients with incurable esophageal and pancreaticobiliary cancer: a descriptive study. Gastroenterol Nurs 2016; 38:42-54. [PMID: 25636012 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with incurable esophageal cancer (EC) or pancreaticobiliary cancer (PBC) often have multiple symptoms and their quality of life is poor. We investigated which problems these patients experience and how often care is expected for these problems to provide optimal professional care. Fifty-seven patients with incurable EC (N = 24) or PBC (N = 33) from our outpatient clinic completed the validated "Problems and Needs for Palliative Care" (PNPC) questionnaire and two disease-specific quality of life questionnaires, European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC). Although patients in general had several problems, physical, emotional, and loss of autonomy (LOA) problems were most common. For these physical and emotional problems, patients also expected professional care, although to a lesser extent for LOA problems. Inadequate care was received for fatigue, fear, frustration, and uncertainty. We conclude that an individualized approach based on problems related to physical, emotional, and LOA issues and anticipated problems with healthcare providers has priority in the follow-up policy of patients with incurable upper gastrointestinal cancer. Caregivers should be alert to discuss needs for fatigue, feelings of fear, frustration, and uncertainty.
Collapse
|
37
|
Inoue T, Ito S, Ando M, Nagaya M, Aso H, Mizuno Y, Hattori K, Nakajima H, Nishida Y, Niwa Y, Kodera Y, Koike M, Hasegawa Y. Changes in exercise capacity, muscle strength, and health-related quality of life in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2016; 8:34. [PMID: 27822378 PMCID: PMC5093971 DOI: 10.1186/s13102-016-0060-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Surgery for cancer of the thoracic esophagus is a challenging procedure associated with high morbidity and mortality. Perioperative rehabilitation has been introduced to promote early mobilization of the patients and to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. The purpose of the present study was to characterize the preoperative functional exercise capacity, muscle strength, anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients with esophageal cancer, and to evaluate the impact of radical esophagectomy on these parameters. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 34 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed resectable esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy followed by postoperative rehabilitation from January to December 2014. Patients were tested for 6-min walk distance (6MWD), knee-extensor muscle strength, hand grip strength, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) before and two weeks after the surgery. Before surgery, the pulmonary function test, and components of the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire for general health were assessed. Results The mean age was 67.3 ± 8.1 years. The patients were predominantly male (76.4 %), had high rates of smoking history (91.2 %), and squamous cell carcinoma (97.1 %). The predicted value for forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 94.0 ± 15.9 %, and 12 patients (35.3 %) had COPD. The clinical stage was 0-I in 12 patients, II in 4 patients, III in 16 patients, and IV in 2 patients. Thirty-one patients (91.2 %) underwent open surgery. At the baseline, components of the SF-36 scores significantly correlated with CAT and HADS scores, and the physical status was significantly poorer in patients with COPD than those without. Comparisons between the preoperative and postoperative values revealed significant decreases in 6MWD, hand grip strength, isometric knee extensor muscle strength, and a significant increase in CAT scores but not in HADS scores after surgery. In multiple regression analysis, decreases in 6MWD after the surgery significantly correlated with the preoperative physical component summary of SF-36. Conclusions Our results indicate that surgery remained detrimental to health outcomes at two weeks. Further research should investigate whether prehabilitation would improve the postoperative outcomes, QOL, and physical fitness. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13102-016-0060-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Inoue
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Satoru Ito
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Center for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Motoki Nagaya
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Hiromichi Aso
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Yota Mizuno
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Keiko Hattori
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Hiroki Nakajima
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Nishida
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Yukiko Niwa
- Gastroenterological Surgery II, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Gastroenterological Surgery II, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Masahiko Koike
- Gastroenterological Surgery II, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| | - Yoshinori Hasegawa
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, 466-8550 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Larsson H, Norder Grusell E, Tegtmeyer B, Ruth M, Bergquist H, Bove M. Grade of eosinophilia versus symptoms in patients with dysphagia and esophageal eosinophilia. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29:971-976. [PMID: 26390287 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess whether the symptom severity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with dysphagia and esophageal eosinophilia correlate with disease activity as expressed by the number of eosinophils in the esophageal mucosa. This study included newly diagnosed (n = 58) or relapsed patients (n = 7), where 40% were diagnosed in connection with esophageal bolus impaction. The mean age was 45 years (19-88), and 74% were men. Symptoms and HRQL were recorded using the Watson Dysphagia Scale (WDS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Oesophageal Module 18 and the Short Form-36 Questionnaire. Histological samples gathered from the proximal and distal esophageal mucosa were stained using both hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and an immunohistochemical (IHC) technique against 'Eosinophil Major Basic Protein,' and the peak number of eosinophils per high-power field was assessed. More eosinophils were detected after IHC staining than HE staining (P < 0.001). No correlation was found between symptoms or the HRQL and the number of eosinophils. However, higher numbers of eosinophils at the proximal esophagus were found in patients with concomitant bolus impaction (IHC P < 0.05 and HE P < 0.05) and could serve as a risk marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Larsson
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, NÄL Medical Centre, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - E Norder Grusell
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - B Tegtmeyer
- Department of Pathology, NÄL Medical Centre, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - M Ruth
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - H Bergquist
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - M Bove
- Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, NÄL Medical Centre, Trollhättan, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Straatman J, Joosten PJM, Terwee CB, Cuesta MA, Jansma EP, van der Peet DL. Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29:760-772. [PMID: 26471471 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is currently the eighth most common cancer worldwide. Improvements in operative techniques and neoadjuvant therapies have led to improved outcomes. Resection of the esophagus carries a high risk of severe complications and has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study was to assess which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to measure QOL after esophagectomy for cancer. A comprehensive search of original articles was conducted investigating QOL after surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Two authors independently selected relevant articles, conducted clinical appraisal, and extracted data (PJ and JS). Out of 5893 articles, 58 studies were included, consisting of 41 prospective and 17 retrospective cohort studies, including a total of 6964 patients. These studies included 11 different PROMs. The existing PROMs could be divided into generic, symptom-specific, and disease-specific questionnaires. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ C-30) along with the EORTC QLQ-OESophagus module OES18 was the most widely used; in 42 and 32 studies, respectively. The EORTC and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaires use an oncological module and an organ-specific module. One validation study was available, which compared the FACT and EORTC, showing moderate to poor correlation between the questionnaires. A great variety of PROMs are being used in the measurement of QOL after surgery for esophageal cancer. A questionnaire with a general module along with a disease-specific module for assessment of QOL of different treatment modalities seem to be the most desirable, such as the EORTC and the FACT with their specific modules (EORTC QLQ-OES18 and FACT-E). Both are developed in different treatment modalities, such as in surgical patients. With regard to reproducibility of current results, the EORTC is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Straatman
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - P J M Joosten
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C B Terwee
- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Cuesta
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E P Jansma
- Medical library, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D L van der Peet
- Departments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Backemar L, Wikman A, Djärv T, Johar A, Lagergren P. Co-morbidity after oesophageal cancer surgery and recovery of health-related quality of life. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1665-1675. [PMID: 27545978 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although health-related quality of life (HRQoL) recovers after surgery for oesophageal cancer in most long-term survivors, one in seven patients experiences a deterioration in HRQoL for reasons yet unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether co-morbidities diagnosed after surgery influence recovery of HRQoL. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction in Sweden between 2001 and 2005 were included. HRQoL was assessed by means of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 questionnaires. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess mean differences in HRQoL scores between three co-morbidity status groups (healthy, stable and increased) over time. Probabilities of deterioration in HRQoL were calculated based on marginal probabilities from logistic regression models. RESULTS At 5 years' follow-up, 153 (24·8 per cent) of 616 patients were alive and 137 responded to at least two of three questionnaires. The healthy and increased co-morbidity groups showed deterioration in almost all aspects of HRQoL at 6 months after surgery compared with baseline. The increased co-morbidity group also deteriorated in several aspects from 3 to 5 years after surgery. Patients with an increase in co-morbidity did not have a significantly increased probability of deterioration in HRQoL over time compared with healthy or stable patients, except with respect to cognitive function, loss of appetite, choking and coughing. CONCLUSION Patients with an increase in co-morbidities after oesophagectomy experience long-term deterioration in HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Backemar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - A Wikman
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Djärv
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Johar
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Lagergren
- Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fuchs H, Hölscher AH, Leers J, Bludau M, Brinkmann S, Schröder W, Alakus H, Mönig S, Gutschow CA. Long-term quality of life after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: extended gastrectomy or transthoracic esophagectomy? Gastric Cancer 2016; 19:312-7. [PMID: 25627475 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-015-0466-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 01/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and extended transhiatal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction are alternative procedures in current therapeutic concepts for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). The impact of these operations on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) is incompletely understood. METHODS Patients with cancer-free survival of at least 24 months after esophagectomy (ESO) or extended gastrectomy (GAST) for AEG were identified from a prospectively maintained database. EORTC questionnaires were sent out to assess health-related general (QLQ-C30) and cancer-specific (OG-25) quality of life. Numeric scores were calculated for each conceptual area and compared with those of healthy reference populations. RESULTS 123 patients (ESO n = 71; GAST n = 52) completed the self-rated questionnaires. HRQL was consistently lower in surgical patients (GAST and ESO) compared with healthy reference populations. Also, there was a general trend for a better HRQL in GAST compared with ESO patients. This trend was statistically significant for physical function (p = 0.04), dyspnea (p = 0.02), and reflux (p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between patients with or without prior neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS After mid- and long-term follow-up, HRQL after extended gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction is superior to that after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction. Improved HRQL after gastrectomy is mainly due to less pulmonary and reflux-related symptoms. Our findings may influence the choice of the surgical strategy for patients with AEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Fuchs
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arnulf H Hölscher
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jessica Leers
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marc Bludau
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastian Brinkmann
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schröder
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hakan Alakus
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Mönig
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Oesophageal cancer is a debilitating disease with a poor prognosis, and weight loss owing to malnutrition prevails in the majority of patients. Cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome characterized by the loss of fat and skeletal muscle mass and systemic inflammation arising from complex host-tumour interactions is a major contributor to malnutrition, which is a determinant of tolerance to treatment and survival. In patients with oesophageal cancer, cachexia is further compounded by eating difficulties owing to the stage and location of the tumour, and the effects of neoadjuvant therapy. Treatment with curative intent involves exceptionally extensive and invasive surgery, and the subsequent anatomical changes often lead to eating difficulties and severe postoperative malnutrition. Thus, screening for cachexia by means of percentage weight loss and BMI during the cancer trajectory and survivorship periods is imperative. Additionally, markers of inflammation (such as C-reactive protein), dysphagia and appetite loss should be assessed at diagnosis. Routine assessments of body composition are also necessary in patients with oesophageal cancer to enable assessment of skeletal muscle loss, which might be masked by sarcopenic obesity in these patients. A need exists for clinical trials examining the effectiveness of therapeutic and physical-activity-based interventions in mitigating muscle loss and counteracting cachexia in these patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Hauser C, Patett C, von Schoenfels W, Heits N, Schafmayer C, Malchow B, Hampe J, Schniewind B, Becker T, Egberts JH. Does neoadjuvant treatment before oncologic esophagectomy affect the postoperative quality of life? A prospective, longitudinal outcome study. Dis Esophagus 2015; 28:652-9. [PMID: 25059631 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) following esophagectomy the focus was placed on the impact of neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. For patients undergoing oncologic surgery, the QoL is generally accepted as an important outcome parameter in addition to clinical parameters. This prospective nonrandomized study evaluated QoL in patients treated by preoperative chemo(radio)therapy followed by either surgery or surgery alone with special focus on the postoperative course. QoL was assessed in 131 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 and a tumor-specific module were administered before surgery, at discharge, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical data were collected prospectively and a follow up was performed every 6 months. The histological type of cancer was squamous cell carcinoma in 49.6% and adenocarcinoma in 50.4%. There was no significant difference between patients that were treated neoadjuvantly and those that were first operated on with regard to morbidity, mortality, and survival rates (5-year survival rate of 34%). Most QoL scores dropped significantly below the baseline in the early postoperative period and recovered slowly during the follow-up period to almost preoperative levels in many scores. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the QoL scales between neoadjuvantly treated or primary operated patients. Esophageal resections are associated with significant deterioration of QoL, which slowly recovers during the follow-up period to an almost preoperative level. Neoadjuvant treatment seems to not further negatively affect the QoL deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hauser
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - C Patett
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - W von Schoenfels
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - N Heits
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - C Schafmayer
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - B Malchow
- Reference Center for Quality of Life, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - J Hampe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - B Schniewind
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - T Becker
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - J-H Egberts
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dysphagia and health-related quality of life in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: a long-term follow-up. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272:3833-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3696-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
45
|
Prasad NRV, Karthigeyan M, Vikram K, Parthasarathy R, Reddy KS. Palliative radiotherapy in esophageal cancer. Indian J Surg 2015; 77:34-8. [PMID: 25829709 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-0817-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2012] [Accepted: 01/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in palliation of dysphagia in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of esophagus and to see the quality of life (QoL) following radiotherapy. This was a prospective clinical study done between September 2006 and May 2008. All consecutive patients with SCC of the esophagus, who are not candidates for definitive treatment, were included in the study. Dysphagia and QoL were assessed using modified Takita's grading and modified questionnaire based on EORTC QLQ 30 respectively. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was delivered to all patients using linear accelerator 6 Mv photons. Patients who had good response with EBRT were further subjected to intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) at 700 cGy using Iridium-192. The cumulative dose each patient received was 65 Gy. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks from completion of treatment to look for any difference in dysphagia grade and QoL following therapy. Thirty-three patients were included in the study. The mean age among males and females was 60.9 and 49.8 years, respectively. Nineteen patients (57.6 %) received EBRT followed by ILBT; the remaining patients received only EBRT. Seven were lost during follow-up, and seven (21.2 %) died during the study period of 6 weeks. Nineteen (57.6 %) were followed up. On follow-up endoscopy, evidence of residual stricture was observed in 57.9 %, and growth in 36.8 %. Of the patients, 27.8 % had biopsy-confirmed residual disease. The median dysphagia score decreased from 4 to 3 after treatment (p = 0.002) in 17 (89.5 %) patients. The mean QoL score improved from 107.5 to 114.1 at 6-week follow-up. Following radiotherapy, 26.3 % had persistent chest pain, increased cough with expectoration in 15.8 %, and hyperpigmentation of skin in 10.5 %. Radiotherapy gives significant relief of dysphagia and improves QoL in 90 % of patients with SCC of esophagus. However, following radiotherapy, a number of patients will have persistent stricture, ulceration, and residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Vishnu Prasad
- Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India
| | - M Karthigeyan
- Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India
| | - Kate Vikram
- Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India
| | - R Parthasarathy
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India
| | - K S Reddy
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dellenmark-Blom M, Chaplin JE, Gatzinsky V, Jönsson L, Abrahamson K. Health-related quality of life among children, young people and adults with esophageal atresia: a review of the literature and recommendations for future research. Qual Life Res 2015; 24:2433-45. [PMID: 25829227 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-0975-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital malformation requisite of surgical treatment. Survival rates have significantly increased in recent decades, but treated children are at risk of chronic morbidity. This study aims to review the literature on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with EA and describe the questionnaires used. METHODS A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Cinahl and PsycINFO, from inception to January 2015. A meta-analysis of studies investigating HRQOL in patients with EA compared to healthy references was performed. The effect size was calculated as Cohen's d. RESULTS Twelve articles (published 1995-2014) describing HRQOL among children, young people and adults were identified. Only European studies were found, and these had variable sample sizes (8-128). Overall HRQOL was reported to be reduced in five of the seven studies that compared overall HRQOL with a healthy reference population. Impaired physical or general health was described in eight articles. In the meta-analysis, eight eligible studies provided 16 estimates of the effect of EA, six of which reached statistical significance for worse HRQOL (p < 0.05). Using Cohen's criteria, the pooled estimate of the effect of EA was small for overall and physical HRQOL, and <0.2 for the mental and social HRQOL components. Altogether, 15 different questionnaires were used, and none were condition specific for EA. CONCLUSIONS Different findings are reported; however, this study suggests that patients with EA may have a reduced HRQOL. Moreover, HRQOL is not adequately measured in this group. Additional research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Dellenmark-Blom
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - John Eric Chaplin
- Gothenburg Pediatric Growth Research Center (GPGRC), Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, 416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Vladimir Gatzinsky
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Linus Jönsson
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kate Abrahamson
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dai Y, Li C, Xie Y, Liu X, Zhang J, Zhou J, Pan X, Yang S. Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD005048. [PMID: 25354795 PMCID: PMC8106614 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005048.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal carcinoma are diagnosed at an advanced stage and require palliative intervention. Although there are many kinds of interventions, the optimal one for the palliation of dysphagia remains unclear. This review updates the previous version published in 2009. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review was to systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. SEARCH METHODS To find new studies for this updated review, in January 2014 we searched, according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL; and major conference proceedings (up to January 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in which patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer underwent palliative treatment. Different interventions like rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination, were included. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data collection and analysis were performed in accordance with the methods of the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Review Group. MAIN RESULTS We included 3684 patients from 53 studies. SEMS insertion was safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provided comparable dysphagia palliation but had an increased requirement for re-interventions and for adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provided comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might have reduced gastro-oesophageal reflux and complications. Newly-designed double-layered nitinol (Niti-S) stents were preferable due to longer survival time and fewer complications compared to simple Niti-S stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life, and might provide better results when combined with argon plasma coagulation or external beam radiation therapy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Some anti-reflux stents and newly-designed stents lead to longer survival and fewer complications compared to conventional stents. Combinations of brachytherapy with self-expanding metal stent insertion or radiotherapy are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, and chemotherapy alone are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingxue Dai
- Department of Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health, Hua Xi School of Public Health, Sichuan University, 17 Ren min nan lu san duan, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Däster S, Soysal SD, Stoll L, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Long-term quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Surg 2014; 38:2345-51. [PMID: 24756548 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2576-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy has a potentially high impact on physical, emotional, and social functions. The aim of this study was to assess long-term health-related quality of life (QOL) after esophageal cancer surgery. METHODS We analyzed all patients who underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer in our hospital from 1999 to 2010. QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer general questionnaire QLQ-C30 and esophagus-specific questionnaire QLQ-OES18. RESULTS A total of 150 patients were operated in the surveyed 12-year period. At the time of analysis, 46 patients (31 %) were eligible for assessment, 97 patients (65 %) had died or experienced tumor recurrence, and seven patients (5 %) were lost to follow-up. Of the 46 eligible patients, 43 (94 %) returned the questionnaires. The median observation interval between the operation and QOL assessment was 40 (range 21-135) months. The QLQ-C30 mean score of global health status and general QOL was similar to that of a healthy reference population. Most of the QLQ-C30 mean scores of functional and symptom scales and QLQ-OES18 symptom scales showed a worse result than for a healthy reference population. The highest mean scores were reflux and eating problems. CONCLUSIONS In the long term, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy provides a generally good QOL for patients with esophageal cancer, which is comparable to a healthy reference population. However, some patients suffer from significant symptoms. Reflux and eating problems were the most relevant complaints. Dietary counseling is therefore important in the postoperative course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvio Däster
- Department of Surgery, Claraspital, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, 4058, Basel, Switzerland,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kumagai K, Kjellin A, Tsai JA, Thorell A, Granqvist S, Lundell L, Håkanson B. Toupet versus Dor as a procedure to prevent reflux after cardiomyotomy for achalasia: results of a randomised clinical trial. Int J Surg 2014; 12:673-80. [PMID: 24892729 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2013] [Revised: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal anti-reflux procedure after Heller cardiomyotomy for oesophageal achalasia remains unclear. The most commonly used procedure is the anterior partial fundoplication according to Dor, although during recent years the posterior counterpart (Toupet) has become popular. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed achalasia and referred for cardiomyotomy were randomised to receive either an anterior or partial posterior fundoplication following a classical cardiomyotomy. The effect of surgery was assessed during the first postoperative year by Eckardt scores, EORTC QLQ-OES18 scores and HRQL questionnaires. Timed barium oesophagogram (TBO) and ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring were performed to determine oesophageal emptying and the degree of reflux control, respectively. RESULTS Forty-two patients were randomised into Dor (n = 20) and Toupet (n = 22) groups. Eckardt scores improved dramatically with both procedures, but the EORTC QLQ-OES18 (functional scales) scores revealed significantly better relative improvements in the Toupet group compared to the Dor repair (P = 0.044). Corresponding advantages in favour of Toupet were observed postoperatively in the percentage of oesophageal emptying at TBO (P = 0.011 in height and P = 0.018 in area), an effect not observed in the Dor group. There were no other significant differences recorded between the study groups concerning HRQL evaluations and objective assessment of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux. CONCLUSIONS A partial posterior fundoplication after cardiomyotomy seems to achieve more improvement in oesophageal emptying and EORTC QLQ-OES18 functional scale scores than the anterior fundoplication. Otherwise no differences between the two anti-reflux repairs were noted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01933373.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koshi Kumagai
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Kjellin
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jon A Tsai
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Anders Thorell
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science at Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Lars Lundell
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Håkanson
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science at Danderyds Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pullmer R, Linden W, Rnic K, Vodermaier A. Measuring symptoms in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of assessment instruments. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22:2941-55. [PMID: 24865875 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2250-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is critical for gastrointestinal cancer researchers and clinicians to have access to comprehensive, sensitive and simple-to-use symptom measures that allow them to understand and quantify the subjective patient experience. Development and validation of such scales requires training in psychometrics and occasionally uses technical jargon that can be difficult to penetrate. This review evaluates existing measures of gastrointestinal cancer symptoms, provides tool descriptions, and uses predefined, objective quality criteria to rate psychometric quality and facilitate tool choices for researchers and clinicians. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were systematically reviewed for scales assessing gastrointestinal cancer and gastrointestinal cancer site-specific symptoms. Evaluation criteria were the following: breadth of domain coverage (content validity), high internal consistency (α ≥ .80), sensitivity to change, and extent of validation. RESULTS In n = 36 validation studies, 26 gastrointestinal cancer symptom measures were identified. Of these, n = 13 tools met criteria for recommendation, and six in particular showed strong psychometric properties. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) gastric cancer module (QLQ-STO22), FACT-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep), and EORTC oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction and stomach module (QLQ OG-25) were identified as the most comprehensive and best validated scales for each of the major gastrointestinal cancer sites. The FACT-Colorectal Symptom Index (FCSI-9) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) FACT-Hepatobiliary Symptom Index (FHSI-18) were specifically validated in patients with advanced colorectal and liver cancer and also demonstrated superior psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS Several comprehensive, well-validated scales exist to adequately assess gastrointestinal cancer site-specific symptoms. Specifically, gastrointestinal cancer submodules of the FACT quality of life questionnaire represent adequate tool choices in most instances and overall, were better validated than the respective EORTC tools. Further improvement of existing, highly rated measures is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle Pullmer
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|