Antiestrogen-liganded estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen responsive element DNA in vitro

Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a ligand-activated enhancer protein that is a member of the steroid/nuclear receptor superfamily. Two genes encode mammalian ER: ERalpha and ERbeta. ER binds to specific DNA sequences called estrogen response elements (EREs) with high affinity and transactivates gene expression in response to estradiol (E(2)). The purpose of this review is to summarize how natural and synthetic variations in the ERE sequence impact the affinity of ER-ERE binding and E(2)-induced transcriptional activity. Surprisingly, although the consensus ERE sequence was delineated in 1989, there are only seven natural EREs for which both ERalpha binding affinity and transcriptional activation have been examined. Even less information is available regarding how variations in ERE sequence impact ERbeta binding and transcriptional activity. Review of data from our own laboratory and those in the literature indicate that ERalpha binding affinity does not relate linearly with E(2)-induced transcriptional activation. We suggest that the reasons for this discord include cellular amounts of coactivators and adaptor proteins that play roles both in ER binding and transcriptional activation; phosphorylation of ER and other proteins involved in transcriptional activation; and sequence-specific and protein-induced alterations in chromatin architecture.

Estrogen response element sequence impacts the conformation and transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor alpha

Estrogens play a critical role in mammary gland development, bone homeostasis, reproduction, and the pathogenesis of breast cancer by activating estrogen receptors (ERs) alpha and beta. Ligand-activated ER stimulates the expression of target proteins by interacting with specific DNA sequences: estrogen response elements (EREs). We have demonstrated that the ERE sequence and the nucleotide sequences flanking the ERE impact ERalpha binding affinity and transcriptional activation. Here, we examined whether the sequence of the ERE modulates ERalpha conformation by measuring changes in sensitivity to protease digestion. ERalpha, occupied by estradiol (E2) or 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), was incubated with select EREs and digested by chymotrypsin followed by a Western analysis with antibodies to ERalpha. ERE binding increased the sensitivity of ERalpha to chymotrypsin digestion. We found both ligand-specific and ERE-specific differences in ERalpha sensitivity to chymotrypsin digestion. The ERE-mediated increase in ERalpha sensitivity to chymotrypsin digestion correlates with E2-stimulated transcriptional activity from the same EREs in transiently transfected cells. Transcriptional activity also correlates with the affinity of ERalpha-ERE binding in vitro. Our results support the hypothesis that the ERE sequence acts as an allosteric effector, altering ER conformation. We speculate that ERE-induced alterations in ERalpha conformation modulate interaction with co-regulatory proteins.

Role of estrogen receptor ligand and estrogen response element sequence on interaction with chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor (COUP-TF)

Estrogen-responsive genes are regulated by altering the balance of estrogen receptor (ER) interaction with transcription activators and inhibitors. Here we examined the role of ER ligand on ER interaction with the Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor (COUP-TF) orphan nuclear receptor. COUP-TF binding to half-site estrogen response elements (EREs) was increased by the addition of estradiol (E2) -liganded ER (E2-ER), but not by ER liganded with the antiestrogens 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT-ER) or tamoxifen aziridine (TAz-ER). ER did not bind to single half-sites. Conversely, COUP-TF enhanced the ERE binding of purified E2-ER, but did not affect TAz-ER-ERE binding. In contrast, only antiestrogens enhanced direct interaction between ER and COUP-TF as assessed by GST pull-down assays. Identical results were obtained using either purified bovine or recombinant human ERalpha. Co-immunoprecipitation assays showed that ER and COUP-TF interact in extracts from MCF-7 and ERalpha-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells. Here we document that ER ligand impacts COUP-TF-ER interaction. COUP-TF interaction is mediated by the DNA binding and ligand-binding domains of ER. We suggest that changes in ER conformation induced by DNA binding reduce ER-COUP-TF interaction. Transient transfection of human MCF-7 breast cancer cells with a COUP-TFI expression vector repressed E2-induced luciferase reporter gene expression from single or multiple tandem copies of a consensus ERE. COUP-TFI stimulated 4-OHT-induced luciferase activity from a minimal ERE. Alone, COUP-TFI increased transcription from ERE half-sites or a single ERE in a sequence-dependent manner. These data provide evidence that the ERE sequence and its immediate flanking regions influence whether COUP-TF enhances, inhibits, or has no effect on ER ligand-induced ERE reporter gene expression and that COUP-TFI activates gene transcription from ERE half-sites. We suggest that COUP-TFI plays a role in mitigating estrogen-responsive gene expression.

Estrogen receptor binding to estrogen response elements slows ligand dissociation and synergistically activates reporter gene expression

Estradiol (E2)-liganded estrogen receptor (ER) bound to three or four tandem copies of a consensus ERE (EREc38) in a cooperative manner. E2-ER binding to one or two EREs was non-cooperative. When ER was liganded by the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), ER-ERE binding was not cooperative, regardless of the number of EREs. Here we evaluated how binding to EREc38 affects ER conformation in the ligand binding domain (LBD) as reflected in the dissociation kinetics of [3H]ligand from the ER. Binding of ER to EREc38 slowed the rate of dissociation of either E2 or 4-OHT, indicating that DNA allosterically modulates the LBD conformation creating a tighter fit between the ligand and the ER. Conformational differences in ER induced by E2 versus antiestrogen were not reflected in differences in E2 or 4-OHT dissociation parameters under these conditions. No difference in the association rate of E2- versus 4-OHT-liganded ER binding to EREc38 was detected in electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Synergistic, E2-dependent activation of a reporter gene was detected from three and four, but not one or two, tandem copies of EREc38. These observations suggest that cooperative binding of E2-ER to multiple copies of EREc38 is likely responsible for transcriptional synergy and that cooperativity may not involve direct interaction between the LBDs of ERE-bound ER. Since the number of copies of EREc38 did not alter E2 dissociation kinetics, functional synergy must involve cellular factors in addition to the ER ligand.

Comparison of tamoxifen ligands on estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that binds to specific DNA sequences, estrogen response elements (EREs). Estradiol-liganded ER (E2-ER) binds cooperatively to stereoaligned EREs that are surrounded by naturally-occurring AT-rich sequences with a stoichiometry of one E2-ER dimer per ERE. When ER is bound by 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), the active metabolite of the widely used therapeutic antiestrogen tamoxifen (TAM), the receptor binds to EREs with high affinity. However, one molecule of 4-OHT ligand dissociates from the ER dimer apparently during the process of binding to DNA, yielding a stoichiometry of one [3H]4-OHT molecule per ERE. To determine whether DNA-binding induced ligand dissociation is a general property of type I antiestrogens that are not covalently attached to the ER, we examined the interaction of ER liganded by tamoxifen (TAM) with EREs. We demonstrate that TAM-ER binds EREs with lower affinity than E2-ER, 4-OHT-ER, or ER liganded by the covalent antiestrogen tamoxifen aziridine. Unlike E2-ER, both TAM and 4-OHT-ER bind EREs non-cooperatively. Like 4-OHT, TAM appears to dissociate from the liganded ER as the receptor binds EREs. Additionally, partial proteolysis of ERE-bound ER by trypsin revealed different cleavage patterns for E2 versus 4-OHT and TAM. These findings indicate that the behavior of the ER liganded by TAM is generally similar to that of the antiestrogen 4-OHT.

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor interacts with estrogen receptor, binds to estrogen response elements and half-sites, and inhibits estrogen-induced gene expression

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor (COUP-TF) was identified as a low abundance protein in bovine uterus that co-purified with estrogen receptor (ER) in a ligand-independent manner and was separated from the ER by its lower retention on estrogen response element (ERE)-Sepharose. In gel mobility shift assays, COUP-TF bound as an apparent dimer to ERE and ERE half-sites. COUP-TF bound to an ERE half-site with high affinity, Kd = 1.24 nM. In contrast, ER did not bind a single ERE half-site. None of the class II nuclear receptors analyzed, i.e. retinoic acid receptor, retinoid X receptor, thyroid receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, or vitamin D receptor, were constituents of the COUP-TF.DNA binding complex detected in gel mobility shift assays. Direct interaction of COUP-TF with ER was indicated by GST "pull-down" and co-immunoprecipitation assays. The nature of the ER ligand influenced COUP-TF-ERE half-site binding. When ER was liganded by the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), COUP-TF-half-site interaction decreased. Conversely, COUP-TF transcribed and translated in vitro enhanced the ERE binding of purified estradiol (E2)-liganded ER but not 4-OHT-liganded ER. Co-transfection of ER-expressing MCF-7 human breast cancer cells with an expression vector for COUP-TFI resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of E2-induced expression of a luciferase reporter gene under the control of three tandem copies of EREc38. The ability of COUP-TF to bind specifically to EREs and half-sites, to interact with ER, and to inhibit E2-induced gene expression suggests COUP-TF regulates ER action by both direct DNA binding competition and through protein-protein interactions.

Effects of multiple estrogen responsive elements, their spacing, and location on estrogen response of reporter genes

Most highly estrogen-responsive genes possess multiple estrogen-responsive elements (EREs) that act synergistically to activate expression. Synergism between EREs appears to depend on structural features of the EREs and the promoter. To examine the activation process, we cloned single or multiple tandem copies of the consensus ERE into reporter plasmids. These plasmids contained either a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase reporter gene driven by a minimal promoter or a luciferase reporter gene driven by the Simian virus 40 (SV40) promoter. Using MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, we demonstrate that synergism among EREs depends on the number of EREs, their spacing, and the distance of the EREs from the promoter. The induction capacity of EREs falls off slowly with distance from the promoter. Remarkably, multiple EREs can induce effectively and synergize even when they are located more than 2000 nucleotides from the promoter. For EREs located immediately upstream of the promoter, both the distance separating the EREs and the distance to the promoter have to be optimal for synergy. Altering either distance changes the response from synergistic to additive. For distant EREs, presumed to interact by a looping mechanism at the promoter, the length of DNA between the EREs and the promoter is not critical. Synergy among closely spaced EREs that are far from the promoter only requires an optimal distance separating the ERE centers of symmetry. Interestingly, very widely separated EREs can also synergize, presumably also because of their ability to interact by looping. The estrogen response from single or multiple tandem copies of ERE half-palindromes near the SV40 promoter was also tested. The negligible induction capacity of a single half-site was not significantly increased in multiple sites. The biological role of half-EREs is not apparent in the system employed here.

hsp70 is not required for high affinity binding of purified calf uterine estrogen receptor to estrogen response element DNA in vitro

Bovine estrogen receptor (ER) was purified to near homogeneity by estrogen response element (ERE) affinity chromatography, and its ERE binding ability was measured in vitro. Highly purified ER bound EREs with reduced affinity compared to partially purified ER. Partially purified ER contained hsp70, but highly purified ER did not. We examined whether addition of purified recombinant human hsp70 or purified bovine hsp70 would restore the higher ERE binding affinity, stoichiometry, and ligand retention detected with partially purified receptor and how hsp70 affected the rate of ER-ERE association and dissociation. ER-ERE binding was not affected by antibodies to either constitutive or induced forms of hsp70, regardless of ER purity. Addition of purified hsp70, with or without ATP and Mg2+, did not affect the association or dissociation rates of highly purified liganded ER binding to ERE. hsp70 Did not alter the total amount of ER-ERE complex formed. Similarly, hsp70 did not affect the rate of [3H]estradiol (E2) or [3H]4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) ligand dissociation from ER in the presence or absence of EREs. These data contrast with a report showing that maximal ERE binding by highly purified recombinant human ER required hsp70. We conclude that ER, purified from a physiological source, i.e., calf uterus, does not require hsp70 for maximal ER-ERE binding in vitro. Additionally, once ER is activated and bound by ligand, the receptor assumes its proper tertiary structure, and hsp70 does not impact ER ligand binding domain conformation.

Binding of type II nuclear receptors and estrogen receptor to full and half-site estrogen response elements in vitro

The mechanism by which retinoids, thyroid hormone (T3) and estrogens modulate the growth of breast cancer cells is unclear. Since nuclear type II nuclear receptors, including retinoic acid receptor (RAR), retinoid X receptor (RXR) and thyroid hormone receptor (TR), bind direct repeats (DR) of the estrogen response elements (ERE) half-site (5'-AGGTCA-3'), we examined the ability of estrogen receptor (ER) versus type II nuclear receptors, i.e. RARalpha, beta and gamma, RXRbeta, TRalpha and TRbeta, to bind various EREs in vitro . ER bound a consensus ERE, containing a perfectly palindromic 17 bp inverted repeat (IR), as a homodimer. In contrast, ER did not bind to a single ERE half-site. Likewise, ER did not bind two tandem (38 bp apart) half-sites, but low ER binding was detected to three tandem copies of the same half-site. RARalpha,beta or gamma bound both ERE and half-site constructs as a homodimer. RXRbeta did not bind full or half-site EREs, nor did RXRbeta enhance RARalpha binding to a full ERE. However, RARalpha and RXRbeta bound a half-site ERE cooperatively forming a dimeric complex. The RARalpha-RXRbeta heterodimer bound the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 estrogen responsive unit, with two non-consensus EREs, with higher affinity than one or two copies of the full or half-site ERE. Both TRalpha and TRbeta bound the full and the half-site ERE as monomers and homodimers and cooperatively as heterodimers with RXRbeta. We suggest that the cellular concentrations of nuclear receptors and their ligands, and the nature of the ERE or half-site sequence and those of its flanking sequences determine the occupation of EREs in estrogen-regulated genes in vivo .

Stability of the ligand-estrogen receptor interaction depends on estrogen response element flanking sequences and cellular factors

To determine whether accessory proteins mediate the ligand- and DNA sequence-dependent specificity of estrogen receptor (ER) interaction with DNA, the binding of partly purified vs highly purified bovine ER to various estrogen response elements (EREs) was measured in the presence of different ER ligands. Partly purified estradiol-liganded ER (E2-ER) binds cooperatively to stereoaligned tandem EREs flanked by naturally occurring AT-rich sequences, with a stoichiometry of one E2-ER dimer per ERE. In contrast, highly purified E2-ER binds with a 10-fold lower affinity and non-cooperatively to EREs flanked by the AT-rich region. Moreover, the binding stoichiometry of highly purified E2-ER was 0.5 E2-ER dimer, or one monomer per ERE, independent of the ERE flanking sequence. Interestingly, the binding of ER liganded with the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT-ER) was non-cooperative with an apparent stoichiometry of 0.5 4-OHT-ER dimer per ERE, regardless of ER purity or ERE flanking sequence. We recently showed that when 4-OHT-ER binds DNA, one molecule of 4-OHT dissociates from the dimeric 4-OHT-ER-ERE complex, accounting for the reduced apparent binding stoichiometry. In contrast, ER covalently bound by tamoxifen aziridine (TAz) gave an ERE binding stoichiometry of one TAz-ER dimer per ERE, and TAz-ER binds cooperatively to multiple AT-rich EREs, regardless of the purity of the receptor. We have obtained evidence that purification of ER removes an accessory protein(s) that interacts with ER in a sequence- and/or DNA conformational-dependent manner, resulting in stabilization of E2, but not 4-OHT, in the ligand binding domain when the receptor binds to DNA. We postulate that retention of ligand by ER maintains the receptor in a conformation necessary to achieve high-affinity, cooperative ERE binding.

Site-directed estrogen receptor antibodies stabilize 4-hydroxytamoxifen ligand, but not estradiol, and indicate ligand-specific differences in the recognition of estrogen response element DNA in vitro

Conformational differences between type I antiestrogen-liganded estrogen receptor and estradiol (E2)-liganded estrogen receptor (ER) are thought to be responsible for differentiating agonist versus antagonist ER activity at individual genes. To examine the impact of ER ligand on estrogen-response element (ERE) binding kinetics and receptor conformation, we quantitated the effect of site-directed, ER-specific antibodies raised against synthetic peptides corresponding to the DNA-binding domain of human ER on ER-ERE binding in vitro. Although 4-hydroxytamoxifen-liganded-ER (4-OHT-ER) and E2-ER bind a consensus ERE with equal high affinity, the stoichiometry of 4-OHT-ER-ERE binding at saturation is approximately 50% lower than that of E2-ER binding to all ERE sequences tested. In contrast, the ERE binding stoichiometry of tamoxifen aziridine-liganded ER (TAz-ER) is identical to that of E2-ER: one receptor dimer bound per ERE. The difference in binding stoichiometry is caused by dissociation of one molecule of 4-OHT from the ER as the dimeric receptor binds DNA. Addition of low concentrations of ER-specific polyclonal antibodies AT3A or AT3B prevented 4-OHT ligand dissociation, yielding an increase in specific 4-OHT-ER-ERE binding to a level equal to that of E2-ER- or TAz-ER-ERE binding. However, higher amounts of AT3A or AT3B inhibited specific ERE binding of both 4-OHT- and E2-ER. We conclude that differences in ER conformation when liganded with 4-OHT versus E2 are revealed by these antibodies and that such differences in receptor conformation may influence subsequent interaction of the receptor with other proteins necessary for transactivation.

Footprint analysis of estrogen receptor binding to adjacent estrogen response elements

Quantitative DNase I footprinting assays were employed to simultaneously measure the amount of estrogen receptor (ER) bound to each site in constructs containing multiple estrogen response elements (EREs). These assays revealed identical, high affinity ER-ERE binding, Kd of approximately 0.25 nM, for estradiol-liganded ER (E2-ER), 4-hydroxytamoxifen liganded ER (4-OHT-ER), tamoxifen aziridine liganded ER (TAz-ER), and unliganded dimeric ER, for each ERE in constructs containing up to four tandem EREs. Increasing concentrations of ER resulted in the same pattern of occupancy for each ERE, whether or not the site was located near other EREs. Similarly, the presence or absence of E2, 4-OHT, or TAz ligand did not change ER-ERE interaction. Since activated ER-ERE binding affinity is identical, whether ER is liganded or unliganded, ligand cannot regulate ER-ERE binding affinity. These results support the hypothesis that ligand-dependent conformational changes primarily determine how ER interacts with components of the transcription initiation complex that mediate gene transactivation. In addition, footprint assays revealed that, following ER binding, an AT-rich site adjacent to the ERE becomes hypersensitive to DNase I digestion. This sequence may be easily or intrinsically bent, assisting in recruiting ER to ERE sites.

Dissociation of 4-hydroxytamoxifen, but not estradiol or tamoxifen aziridine, from the estrogen receptor as the receptor binds estrogen response element DNA

Estradiol-liganded estrogen receptor (E2-ER) binds EREs with a stoichiometry of one E2-ER dimer per estrogen response element (ERE). In contrast, although 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT)-liganded ER (4-OHT-ER) binds EREs with high affinity, its saturation ERE binding capacity is consistently half that of E2-ER, giving an apparent stoichiometry of one 4-OHT-ER monomer per ERE. Here we show that one molecule of 4-OHT ligand dissociates from the ER dimer apparently during the process of binding to DNA. Under equilibrium conditions, the type I antiestrogen tamoxifen aziridine (TAz), covalently attached to ER (TAz-ER), binds a single ERE with high affinity (Kd = 0.27 nM), comparable to that of E2-ER and 4-OHT-ER. In contrast to 4-OHT-ER, the ERE binding stoichiometry of TAz-ER was identical to that of E2-ER: one dimeric receptor per ERE. By measuring [3H]ligand that was initially bound to ER, a significant loss of [3H]4-OHT from ER was detected after ERE binding, whereas all [3H]E2 or [3H]TAz remained ER-bound. These results confirm that one molecule of 4-OHT ligand dissociates from the ER dimer as a consequence of ERE binding. Binding of 4-OHT and TAz are likely to induce a conformation in ER dimers that alters their capacity for gene activation. Upon ER binding to DNA, this conformation reveals itself by allowing 4-OHT dissociation, and predictably would allow TAz dissociation were it not bound covalently.

Mechanisms of action of endocrine treatment in breast cancer

Endocrine treatment plays an important role in the therapy of breast cancer. While the basic mechanisms are understood, additional mechanisms may be of importance to their action and they may also contribute to the mechanism(s) of acquired resistance. Currently, several novel drugs are entering into clinical trials. Observations of the absence or presence of cross resistance to novel 'pure' steroidal antiestrogens and the non-steroidal tamoxifen may add important information to our understanding of the mechanisms of action of both classes of drugs. Similarly, exploration of different aromatase inhibitors in sequence or concert, as well as the combining of different endocrine treatment options may be warranted. Additionally, alterations in different biochemical parameters such as growth factors should not only be carefully explored in relation to treatment options but should also be followed during the course of treatment to asess alterations over time and in relation to the development of drug resistance.

Yeast two-hybrid system demonstrates that estrogen receptor dimerization is ligand-dependent in vivo

Previous studies using in vitro procedures have not clearly established whether the estrogen receptor (ER) acts as a monomer or dimer in the cell. We have used the yeast two-hybrid system as an in vivo approach to investigate the dimerization of the estrogen receptor in the absence and presence of estrogen and anti-estrogens. This system is independent of ER binding to the estrogen response element. Two vectors, expressing GAL4 DNA binding domain-human ER and GAL4 transactivation domain-human ER, were constructed. Control experiments showed that each fusion protein had a high affinity binding site for estradiol-17 beta and could transactivate an ERE-LacZ reporter gene in yeast similar to the wild type ER. The two fusion proteins, GAL4 DB-hER and GAL 4 TA-hER, were expressed in the yeast strain, PCY2, which carries a GAL1 promoter-lacZ reporter. ER dimerization was measured via reconstitution of GAL4 through interaction of the fusion proteins, which transactivates LacZ through the GAL1 promoter. When both ER fusion proteins were expressed, beta-galactosidase activity was estradiol-17 beta-inducible. Furthermore, we showed that both tamoxifen and ICI 182,780 also induced beta-galactosidase activity, albeit lower than that induced by estradiol-17 beta. These results strongly argue that ER dimerization is ligand-dependent and the dimer can be induced by estradiol-17 beta, tamoxifen, or ICI 182,780. We also treated the yeast containing the two fusion proteins with estradiol-17 beta and tamoxifen or ICI 182,780 simultaneously to determine the effects on ER dimerization. beta-Galactosidase activity was lower when the yeast was treated with a higher ratio of tamoxifen or ICI 182,780 to estrogen than estradiol-17 beta alone. Taken together, we conclude that ER dimerization is ligand (estradiol-17 beta, tamoxifen, or ICI 182, 780)-dependent, and we suggest that estradiol-17 beta-induced dimers are destabilized when estradiol-17 beta is used with tamoxifen or ICI 182,780 simultaneously.

Identification of a new subclass of Alu DNA repeats which can function as estrogen receptor-dependent transcriptional enhancers

We have utilized a genetic selection system in yeast to identify novel estrogen-responsive genes within the human genome and to define the sequences in the BRCA-1 gene responsible for its estrogen responsiveness. This approach led to the identification of a new subclass within the Alu family of DNA repeats which have diverged from known Alu sequences and have acquired the ability to function as estrogen receptor-dependent enhancers. Importantly, these new elements confer receptor-dependent estrogen responsiveness to a heterologous promoter when assayed in mammalian cells. This transcriptional activity can be attenuated by the addition of either of three different classes of estrogen receptor antagonists, indicating that these elements function as classical estrogen receptor-dependent enhancers. Furthermore, this enhancer activity is restricted to a specific subset of DNA repeats because consensus Alu elements of four major subfamilies do not respond to the estrogen receptor. Previously, most Alu sequences have been considered to be functionally inert. However, this work provides strong evidence that a significant subset can confer estrogen responsiveness upon a promoter within which they are located. Clearly, Alu sequences must now be considered as important contributors to the regulation of gene transcription in estrogen receptor-containing cells.

Differential impact of flanking sequences on estradiol- vs 4-hydroxytamoxifen-liganded estrogen receptor binding to estrogen responsive element DNA

The mechanism by which antiestrogens antagonize the ability of estrogen receptor (ER) to induce the transcription of estrogen-regulated genes is only partially understood. To examine the effect of estrogen responsive element (ERE) stereoalignment and flanking sequences on estradiol-liganded ER (E2-ER)-ERE and antiestrogen-liganded ER (4-hydroxytamoxifen-liganded ER or 4-OHT-ER)-ERE binding, several dimeric EREs, containing a perfect inverted repeat (5'-GGTCAgagTGACC-3') but lacking the AT-rich flanking sequences typical of highly estrogen-responsive promoters, were cloned into a plasmid vector. The ERE centers of symmetry were spaced 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 6.4 and 6.7 helical turns apart. E2-ER and 4-OHT-ER binding to these constructs was specific and saturable, but orientation-independent and, in contrast to our earlier work with E2-ER binding to AT-rich EREs, not cooperative. The affinity of E2-ER binding decreased as the distance between adjacent EREs was increased, suggesting that E2-ER binding to closely spaced EREs is more stable (Kd = 0.38, 0.58, 0.83, 1.23, and 0.96 nM, respectively, for the above spacings). In contrast, the affinity of 4-OHT-ER binding increased with increased ERE spacing (Kd = 2.90, 4.79, 1.39, 1.77, and 0.92 nM, respectively). The presence of AT-rich sequences flanking the ERE increased the binding affinity of E2-ER and 4-OHT-ER, an increase reflected in slower dissociation rates of ER from these EREs. The AT-rich sequence also enhanced the binding capacity of E2-ER but not 4-OHT-ER. Since the binding capacity of 4-OHT-ER is identical with or without an AT-rich region, we suggest that flanking sequences are more important in stabilizing E2-ER binding and may be critical for cooperative binding to stereoaligned EREs.

Ligand-mediated modulation of estrogen receptor conformation by estradiol analogs

The studies presented here show how changing the structure of the ligand can affect the conformation of the receptor. Five different estradiol analogs have been tested for binding to the calf uterine estrogen receptor. In three of the analogs the phenolic hydroxyl group had been moved from the 3 to the 1, 2, or 4 position on the A-ring (1-hydroxyestratrien-17 beta-ol, 2-hydroxyestratrien-17 beta-ol, or 4-hydroxyestratrien-17 beta-ol). In the remaining two analogs either the A- or the D-ring hydroxyl group had been removed altogether (estratrien-17 beta-ol or 3-hydroxyestratriene). Competition binding assay showed that the relative binding affinity for the estrogen receptor had been weakened by all changes in the structure of the ligand. Furthermore, the ligands in which either the 3 beta- or the 17 beta-hydroxyl group was missing produced nonparallel slopes in the linear portions of the displacement curves compared to that of estradiol; the ligands in which the phenolic hydroxyl had simply been moved around the A-ring, however, did not. These observations implied that the receptor binding mechanism used by the monohydroxyl ligands was different from that of estradiol. Saturation binding analysis showed that while the presence of any of the dihydroxyl ligands or that of estratrien-17 beta-ol decreased the positive cooperativity of the [3H]estradiol-estrogen receptor interaction, the presence of the 3-hydroxyestratriene ligand increased it. These results suggest that both the binding mechanism and the affinity of the ligand for the receptor are exquisitely sensitive to the structure of the ligand.