An investigation of the association between exposure to styrene and hearing loss

Exposure to lead, mercury, styrene, and toluene and hearing impairment: evaluation of dose-response relationships, regulations, and controls

The risk of hearing loss from exposure to ototoxic chemicals is not reflected in occupational exposure limits and most jurisdictions. The aims of this research were to investigate dose-response relationships between exposure to lead, mercury, toluene, and styrene and hearing impairment based on current epidemiological evidence, conduct cross-jurisdictional comparisons, and investigate control measures for exposure to ototoxic chemicals. Ovid Medline and Ovid Embase databases were used to find relevant publications. A total of 86 epidemiological studies met the eligibility criteria for final evaluation. When significant associations between exposure and outcome were identified, exposure levels were evaluated to determine whether No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) could be identified. Cross-jurisdictional comparisons included the U.K., U.S., Canada, and Australia occupational health and safety legislations. The majority of lead (75%), styrene (74%), and toluene (77%) studies showed significantly increased risks of hearing loss from exposure to these substances, although numerous studies on toluene (70%) and styrene (16%) compared auditory function between "solvent mixture" or "noise and solvent mixture" exposed groups and controls and not necessarily on groups exposed to a single agent. Based on five studies, blood lead ranges of 1-1.99 μg/dL to 2.148-2.822 μg/dL were identified as NOAELs while blood lead levels of 2 μg/dL up to 2.823-26.507 μg/dL were identified as LOAELs for hearing loss. Except for general duty clauses, the U.S., Canadian, and Australian jurisdictions have set no enforceable regulations specific to ototoxic chemical exposures. A biological exposure index of 2 μg/dL is recommended for prevention of hearing impairment from lead exposure. Based on Safe Work Australia, noise exposure limits may be reduced to 80 dB(A) for 8 hr. Other recommendations include performing audiometric testing and controlling exposure through all routes of entry.

Microplastics in Sea Turtles, Marine Mammals and Humans: A One Environmental Health Perspective

Microplastics are ubiquitous pollutants in the marine environment and a health concern. They are generated directly for commercial purposes or indirectly from the breakdown of larger plastics. Examining a toxicological profile for microplastics is a challenge due to their large variety of physico-chemical properties and toxicological behavior. In addition to their concentration, other parameters such as polymer type, size, shape and color are important to consider in their potential toxicity. Microplastics can adsorb pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) or metals on their surface and are likely to contain plastic additives that add to their toxicity. The observations of microplastics in seafood increased concern for potential human exposure. Since literature considering microplastics in humans is scarce, using a One Environmental Health approach can help better inform about potential human exposures. Marine mammals and sea turtles are long-lived sentinel species regularly used for biomonitoring the health status of the ocean and share trophic chain and habitat with humans. This review considers the available research regarding microplastic and plastic fiber exposures in humans, marine mammals and turtles. Overall, across the literature, the concentration of microplastics, size, color, shape and polymer types found in GI tract and feces from sea turtles, marine mammals and humans are similar, showing that they might be exposed to the same microplastics profile. Additionally, even if ingestion is a major route of exposure due to contaminated food and water, dermal and inhalation studies in humans have provided data showing that these exposures are also health concerns and more effort on these routes of exposures is needed. In vitro studies looked at a variety of endpoints showing that microplastics can induce immune response, oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, alter membrane integrity and cause differential expression of genes. However, these studies only considered three polymer types and short-term exposures, whereas, due to physiological relevance, prolonged exposures might be more informative.

Cochlear dysfunction is associated with styrene exposure in humans

AIM

Occupational exposure to styrene has been shown to be associated with an increased probability of developing hearing loss. However, the sites of lesions in the auditory system in humans remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible adverse effects of styrene exposure on the cochlea of human subjects.

DESIGN

The hearing function of 98 styrene-exposed male workers from the glass fibre-reinforced plastics industry (mean concentration of 55 mg/m3) was evaluated bilaterally using pure-tone audiometry (1000-16000 Hz), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory brainstem response (ABR). The results were compared to a group of 111 male workers exposed to noise (above 85 dBA) and 70 male white-collar workers exposed to neither noise nor solvents. Age and noise exposure levels were accounted for as confounding variables in all statistical models.

RESULTS

Styrene exposure was significantly associated with poorer pure-tone thresholds (1-8 kHz), lower DPOAE amplitudes (5-6 kHz), and shorter wave V latencies in both ears compared to control-group subjects. Similar results were found among noise-exposed subjects. A further analysis with wave V latency showed that styrene-exposed subjects showed significantly shorter latencies than expected according to normative data. These results suggest that occupational exposure to styrene at moderate concentrations is associated with cochlear dysfunction, at least at high frequencies. DPOAEs may be considered a valuable diagnostic tool in hearing conservation programs in workers exposed to styrene.

Evaluation of potential health effects associated with occupational and environmental exposure to styrene - an update

The potential chronic health risks of occupational and environmental exposure to styrene were evaluated to update health hazard and exposure information developed since the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis risk assessment for styrene was performed in 2002. The updated hazard assessment of styrene's health effects indicates human cancers and ototoxicity remain potential concerns. However, mechanistic research on mouse lung tumors demonstrates these tumors are mouse-specific and of low relevance to human cancer risk. The updated toxicity database supports toxicity reference levels of 20 ppm (equates to 400 mg urinary metabolites mandelic acid + phenylglyoxylic acid/g creatinine) for worker inhalation exposure and 3.7 ppm and 2.5 mg/kg bw/day, respectively, for general population inhalation and oral exposure. No cancer risk value estimates are proposed given the established lack of relevance of mouse lung tumors and inconsistent epidemiology evidence. The updated exposure assessment supports inhalation and ingestion routes as important. The updated risk assessment found estimated risks within acceptable ranges for all age groups of the general population and workers with occupational exposures in non-fiber-reinforced polymer composites industries and fiber-reinforced polymer composites (FRP) workers using closed-mold operations or open-mold operations with respiratory protection. Only FRP workers using open-mold operations not using respiratory protection have risk exceedances for styrene and should be considered for risk management measures. In addition, given the reported interaction of styrene exposure with noise, noise reduction to sustain levels below 85 dB(A) needs be in place.

Association of organic solvents and occupational noise on hearing loss and tinnitus among adults in the U.S., 1999-2004

PURPOSE

Exposure to organic solvents and noise may be causal agents in the development of hearing loss and tinnitus. The objectives of the present study were to examine the association of organic solvents with hearing loss and tinnitus and to assess the interaction of organic solvent and occupational noise exposure on hearing loss and tinnitus.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Occupational Information Network (O*NET) among a study population ranging from 1085 to 2471 study participants from 1999 to 2004. Multiple multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the associations of individual organic solvent exposures as measured by blood biomarkers (1,4-dichlorobenzene, benzene, ethylbenzene, styrene, toluene, o-xylene, and m-/p-xylene) with self-reported hearing loss, audiometrically assessed hearing loss, and self-reported tinnitus. Models were adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, diabetes, non-occupational noise exposure, smoking, and income. Organic solvents found to be statistically significantly associated with the outcome after adjusting for covariates were tested for interaction with occupational noise exposure.

RESULTS

Solvent exposure was not statistically significantly associated with self-reported tinnitus. Benzene (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.78), ethylbenzene (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.50), and toluene (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06-1.52) concentrations were statistically significantly associated with increased adjusted odds of high-frequency hearing loss. No statistically significant interaction was observed between these solvents and occupational noise on high-frequency hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of an association between organic solvents and tinnitus; however, there was evidence of an association between organic solvent exposure and prevalence of high-frequency hearing loss.

Occupational Styrene Exposure on Auditory Function Among Adults: A Systematic Review of Selected Workers

A review study was conducted to examine the adverse effects of styrene, styrene mixtures, or styrene and/or styrene mixtures and noise on the auditory system in humans employed in occupational settings. The search included peer-reviewed articles published in English language involving human volunteers spanning a 25-year period (1990–2015). Studies included peer review journals, case–control studies, and case reports. Animal studies were excluded. An initial search identified 40 studies. After screening for inclusion, 13 studies were retrieved for full journal detail examination and review. As a whole, the results range from no to mild associations between styrene exposure and auditory dysfunction, noting relatively small sample sizes. However, four studies investigating styrene with other organic solvent mixtures and noise suggested combined exposures to both styrene organic solvent mixtures may be more ototoxic than exposure to noise alone. There is little literature examining the effect of styrene on auditory functioning in humans. Nonetheless, findings suggest public health professionals and policy makers should be made aware of the future research needs pertaining to hearing impairment and ototoxicity from styrene. It is recommended that chronic styrene-exposed individuals be routinely evaluated with a comprehensive audiological test battery to detect early signs of auditory dysfunction.

Perda auditiva associada à exposição ocupacional a solventes orgânicos: uma revisão sistemática

Resumo Introdução: evidências apontam produtos químicos como agentes potencialmente otoneurotóxicos, todavia, ainda não há consenso quanto às associações entre as características das exposições e a ototoxicidade das diversas substâncias químicas presentes em ambientes laborais. Objetivo: revisar a literatura científica disponível, a fim de identificar estudos que apontem evidências de associação, ou não associação, entre dano auditivo e a exposição a solventes orgânicos. Método: revisão sistemática da literatura a partir da consulta a bases de dados eletrônicas, considerando artigos originais, publicados de janeiro de 1987 a fevereiro de 2013. Resultados: trinta e um estudos foram incluídos na revisão sistemática. Discussão: os estudos confirmaram a exposição a determinados solventes como fator de risco para perda auditiva de origem ocupacional, sobretudo na presença do ruído. Foram utilizados métodos variados de avaliação e classificação do desfecho coclear e/ou central, que contribuíram para a compreensão da extensão da perda auditiva induzida quimicamente, bem como com a identificação dos grupos populacionais susceptíveis. Contudo, dados sobre procedimentos diagnósticos adequados, níveis seguros e efeito dose-resposta da exposição química ainda não foram totalmente elucidados.

Perfil audiológico de motoristas agrícolas expostos: ruído e hidrocarbonetos

RESUMO Objetivo: Estabelecer o perfil audiológico de motoristas agrícolas expostos, simultaneamente, a ruído e hidrocarbonetos. Métodos: Foram analisados os prontuários de motoristas com queixas auditivas de uma empresa do ramo agrícola do município de Lençóis Paulista (SP), dentro do Programa de Prevenção de Riscos Ambientais (PPRA). As informações analisadas foram: idade, tempo de exposição combinada a ruído e hidrocarbonetos e exames de audiometria tonal liminar de referência. Para a análise da influência da idade e do tempo de exposição sobre os limiares auditivos, ajustaram-se modelos de sobrevivência para dados grupados (riscos proporcionais e logísticos). Resultados: Verificou-se que os efeitos da idade e do tempo de exposição combinada a ruído e hidrocarbonetos foram significativos na perda de audição, nos modelos de riscos proporcionais e logísticos. Conclusão: É fundamental o desenvolvimento de ações voltadas para a prevenção de perdas auditivas em motoristas agrícolas expostos aos agentes ruído e hidrocarbonetos.

Urinary heavy metals, phthalates, perchlorate, nitrate, thiocyanate, hydrocarbons, and polyfluorinated compounds are associated with adult hearing disturbance: USA NHANES, 2011–2012

BACKGROUND

Links between environmental chemicals and human health have emerged, but the effects on hearing were less studied. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the relationships of different sets of environmental chemicals and the hearing conditions in a national and population-based setting.

METHODS

Data was retrieved from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2011-2012 including demographics, serum measurements, lifestyle factors, self-reported hearing conditions, and urinary environmental chemical concentrations. Chi-square test, t test, and survey-weighted logistic regression models were performed.

RESULTS

Among the American adults aged 20-69 (n=5560), 462 (8.3 %) people reported their hearing condition as moderate trouble to deaf. They had higher levels of urinary hydrocarbons and polyfluorinated compounds but not heavy metals, phthalates, arsenic, pesticides, phenols, parabens, perchlorate, nitrate, and thiocyanate concentrations. Also, 466 (10.0 %) people had hearing difficulties during conversation. They had higher levels of urinary cobalt (odds ratio (OR) 1.27, 95 % confidence interval (95%CI) 1.00-1.63), molybdemum (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.04-2.02), strontium (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.10-2.21), phthalates, perchlorate (OR 1.27, 95%CI 1.05-1.54), nitrate (OR 1.60, 1.03-2.49) and thiocyanate (OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.01-1.48) concentrations but not arsenic, pesticides, phenols, parabens, hydrocarbons, and polyfluorinated compounds. Moreover, people who reported difficulties in following conversation with background noise had higher levels of urinary tin concentrations (OR 1.17, 1.00-1.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary heavy metals, phthalates, perchlorate, nitrate, thiocyanate, hydrocarbons, and polyfluorinated compounds were associated with the adult hearing disturbance, although the causality cannot be established. Elimination of these environmental chemicals might need to be considered in future environmental health policy and health intervention programs.

Avaliação do sistema auditivo em agricultores expostos à agrotóxicos

Objetivos avaliar o sistema auditivo periférico, por meio de audiometria tonal, em agricultores residentes em área de intenso uso de agrotóxicos no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Métodos foram avaliados 70 indivíduos, de ambos os gêneros, moradores de Campos dos Goytacazes, com idade variando entre 25 e 59 anos, sendo 35 agricultores e 35 não agricultores. Todos os indivíduos tiveram sua audição periférica avaliada, por meio de audiometria tonal nas frequências de 250, 500, 1.000, 2.000, 3.000, 4.000, 6.000 e 8.000Hz. Foram excluídos indivíduos com alteração de orelha externa e média e/ou com alguma queixa otológica. Além disso, foi realizada anamnese com questões relacionadas à saúde, situação sócio-econômica, educação e exposição ao agrotóxico. Foi considerada perda auditiva, os limiares maiores ou iguais a 25dB em qualquer das frequências testadas. Resultados o Odds Ratio de perda auditiva foi 3,67 vezes (IC95%: 2,08-6,48) maior entre agricultores (94,3%), quando comparados aos não agricultores (25,7%). Além disso, a maior parte das alterações auditivas foi observada nas frequências mais agudas. Conclusão o presente estudo sugere que a atividade agrícola e possivelmente a exposição a agrotóxicos aumenta o risco de perda auditiva.

Noise-induced hearing loss in Korean workers: co-exposure to organic solvents and heavy metals in nationwide industries

Background

Noise exposure is a well-known contributor to work-related hearing loss. Recent biological evidence suggests that exposure to ototoxic chemicals such as organic solvents and heavy metals may be additional contributors to hearing loss. However, in industrial settings, it is difficult to determine the risks of hearing loss due to these chemicals in workplaces accompanied by excessive noise exposure. A few studies suggest that the effect of noise may be enhanced by ototoxic chemicals. Therefore, this study investigated whether co-exposure to organic solvents and/or heavy metals in the workplace modifies the risk of noise exposure on hearing loss in a background of excessive noise.

Methods

We examined 30,072 workers nationwide in a wide range of industries from the Korea National Occupational Health Surveillance 2009. Data on industry-based exposure (e.g., occupational noise, heavy metals, and organic solvents) and subject-specific health outcomes (e.g., audiometric examination) were collected. Noise was measured as the daily 8-h time-weighted average level. Air conduction hearing thresholds were measured from 0.5 to 6 kHz, and pure-tone averages (PTA) (i.e., means of 2, 3, and 4 kHz) were computed.

Results

In the multivariate linear model, PTA increment with occupational noise were 1.64-fold and 2.15-fold higher in individuals exposed to heavy metals and organic solvents than in unexposed individuals, respectively.

Conclusion

This study provides nationwide evidence that co-exposure to heavy metals and/or organic solvents may exacerbate the effect of noise exposure on hearing loss in workplaces. These findings suggest that workers in industries dealing with heavy metals or organic solvents are susceptible to such risks.

A weight of evidence approach for the assessment of the ototoxic potential of industrial chemicals

There is accumulating epidemiological evidence that exposure to some solvents, metals, asphyxiants and other substances in humans is associated with an increased risk of acquiring hearing loss. Furthermore, simultaneous and successive exposure to certain chemicals along with noise can increase the susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. There are no regulations that require hearing monitoring of workers who are employed at locations in which occupational exposure to potentially ototoxic chemicals occurs in the absence of noise exposure. This project was undertaken to develop a toxicological database allowing the identification of possible ototoxic substances present in the work environment alone or in combination with noise exposure. Critical toxicological data were compiled for chemical substances included in the Quebec occupational health regulation. The data were evaluated only for noise exposure levels that can be encountered in the workplace and for realistic exposure concentrations up to the short-term exposure limit or ceiling value (CV) or 5 times the 8-h time-weighted average occupational exposure limit (TWA OEL) for human data and up to 100 times the 8-h TWA OEL or CV for animal studies. In total, 224 studies (in 150 articles of which 44 evaluated the combined exposure to noise and a chemical) covering 29 substances were evaluated using a weight of evidence approach. For the majority of cases where potential ototoxicity was previously proposed, there is a paucity of toxicological data in the primary literature. Human and animal studies indicate that lead, styrene, toluene and trichloroethylene are ototoxic and ethyl benzene, n-hexane and p-xylene are possibly ototoxic at concentrations that are relevant to the occupational setting. Carbon monoxide appears to exacerbate noise-induced hearing dysfunction. Toluene interacts with noise to induce more severe hearing losses than the noise alone.

Combined effects of ototoxic solvents and noise on hearing in automobile plant workers in Iran

Exposure of workers to mixtures of organic solvents and to occupational noise is frequent in a number of industries. Recent studies suggest that exposure to both can cause a more severe hearing loss than exposure to noise alone. Our cross-sectional study included 411 workers of a large automobile plant divided in three groups. The first group included assembly workers exposed to noise alone; the second included workers in a new paint shop, who were exposed to a mixture of organic solvents at a permissible level; and the third group included paint shop workers exposed to both noise and higher than permissible levels of organic solvents in an old paint shop. These groups were compared in terms of low-frequency hearing loss (model 1; average hearing threshold >25 dB at 0.5 kHz, 1 kHz, and 2 kHz) and high-frequency hearing loss (model 2; average hearing threshold >25 dB at 3 kHz, 4 kHz, 6 kHz, and 8 kHz). High-frequency hearing loss was more common in workers exposed to a combination of noise and mixed organic solvents even at permissible levels than in workers exposed to noise alone even after correction for confounding variables. This study shows that combined exposure to mixed organic solvents and occupational noise can exacerbate hearing loss in workers. Therefore, an appropriate hearing protection programme is recommended, that would include short-interval audiometric examinations and efficient hearing protectors.

Organic solvents and hearing loss: The challenge for audiology

Organic solvents have been reported to adversely affect human health, including hearing health. Animal models have demonstrated that solvents may induce auditory damage, especially to the outer hair cells. Research on workers exposed to solvents has suggested that these chemicals may also induce auditory damage through effects on the central auditory pathways. Studies conducted with both animals and humans demonstrate that the hearing frequencies affected by solvent exposure are different to those affected by noise, and that solvents may interact synergistically with noise. The present article aims to review the contemporary literature of solvent-induced hearing loss, and consider the implications of solvent-induced auditory damage for clinical audiologists. Possible audiological tests that may be used when auditory damage due to solvent exposure is suspected are discussed.

Occupational styrene exposure and hearing loss: a cohort study with repeated measurements

OBJECTIVE

Associations between occupational styrene exposure and impairment of hearing function were investigated, guided by three questions: are there hearing losses concerning high frequency and standard audiometric test? Are there dose-response relationships and measurable thresholds of effects? Are there signs of reversibility of possible effects if the workers are examined during times of improvement from their work?

METHODS

A group of workers from a boat building plant, some of whom were laminators, were examined in subgroups of current low (n = 99, mean mandelic acid MA + phenylglyoxylic acid PGA = 51 mg/g creatinine), medium (n = 118, mean 229 mg/g creat.) and high (n = 31, mean 970 mg/g creat.) exposure to styrene. In addition, subgroups chronically exposed to high-long (n = 17) and low-short (n = 34) styrene levels were analysed. The examinations were carried out during normal work days and during the company holidays. Hearing thresholds and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) were measured. Statistics included multiple co-variance analyses with repeated measures, linear regressions, and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

The analyses of all participants demonstrated no clear exposure effects. Particularly no sufficient proof of dose-response relationship measured against parameters of current exposure (MA + PGA, styrene/blood) and of chronic exposure (cumulative and average life time exposure resp.) was found. The analyses of groups exposed to high levels show elevated thresholds at frequencies up to 1,500 Hz among the subgroup exposed to high styrene levels (e.g. 40-50 ppm as average) for a longer period of time (e.g. more than 10 years). These participants also demonstrated signs of "improvement" at frequencies above 2,000 Hz during work holidays, when they were not exposed to styrene. A significantly elevated odds ratio for cases of hearing loss (more than 25 dB (A) in one ear, 3,000-6,000 Hz) was found among the group exposed to high levels (above 30 ppm as average) for a longer period of time (more than 10-26 years). The measurements of TEOAE did not exhibit significant results related to exposure.

CONCLUSION

This study found, that chronic and intensive styrene exposure increases the hearing thresholds. At levels of about 30-50 ppm as an average inhaled styrene per work day over a period of about 15 years with higher exposure levels above 50 ppm in the past, an elevated risk for impaired hearing thresholds can be expected. The formerly published results on ototoxic effects below 20 ppm could not be confirmed. With few exceptions (at frequencies of 1,000 and 1,500 Hz) no dose-response relationship between threshold and exposure data was found. Improvements of hearing thresholds during work- and exposure-free period are possible.

Hearing loss among licensed pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated self-reported hearing loss and pesticide exposure in licensed private pesticide applicators enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study in 1993 to 1997 in Iowa and North Carolina.

METHODS

Among 14,229 white male applicators in 1999 to 2003, 4926 reported hearing loss (35%). Logistic regression was performed with adjustment for state, age, and noise, solvents, and metals. We classified pesticides by lifetime days of use.

RESULTS

Compared with no exposure, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the highest quartile of exposure was 1.19 (1.04 to 1.35) for insecticides and 1.17 (1.03 to 1.31) for organophosphate insecticides. Odds of hearing loss were elevated for high pesticide exposure events (1.38, 1.25 to 1.54), pesticide-related doctor visits (1.38, 1.17 to 1.62) or hospitalization (1.81, 1.25 to 2.62), and diagnosed pesticide poisoning (1.75, 1.36 to 2.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Although control for exposure to noise or other neurotoxicants was limited, this study extends previous reports suggesting that organophosphate exposure increases risk of hearing loss.

Dados sociodemográficos e condições de trabalho de pintores expostos a solventes em uma universidade pública da cidade do Rio de Janeiro

O artigo apresenta os dados sociodemográficos e as condições de trabalho de pintores de uma universidade pública da cidade do Rio de Janeiro expostos a solventes. O desenho de pesquisa utilizado foi estudo transversal. Foram avaliados 55 pintores, sendo os dados sociodemográficos e da história ocupacional coletados através do Bloco de Entrevista de Saúde do Trabalhador. A faixa etária mais freqüente foi de 41-50 anos de idade (38,18%) e a maioria dos pintores trabalhava na universidade há mais de 10 anos (70,91%). Quanto às condições de trabalho, 58,2% dos pintores informaram que nunca usavam equipamento de proteção individual; 52,73% desconheciam a existência da Comissão Interna de Prevenção de Acidentes de Trabalho; 92,73% realizavam algum tipo de movimento repetitivo; 60% deles possuíam outra fonte de renda (sendo a maioria como pintor autônomo) e 87,3% consideravam bom o relacionamento no trabalho. Vinte e cinco (45,45%) já exerciam atividade como pintores antes de trabalharem na universidade. O inventário do local de trabalho revelou que o ambiente e as condições de trabalho eram inadequados.

Ototoxicity of organic solvents - from scientific evidence to health policy

The scientific workshop, organized under the 6th European Framework Programme, the Marie Curie Host Fellowship for the Transfer of Knowledge "NoiseHear" Project, by the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine (Łódź, Poland, 15-16 November 2006), gathered world specialists in noise, chemicals, and ototoxicity, including hearing researchers, toxicologists, otolaryngologists, audiologists and occupational health physicians.The workshop examined the evidence and the links between isolated exposure to organic solvents, combined exposure to noise and solvents, and effects on the auditory system. Its main purpose was to review the key scientific evidence to gather the necessary knowledge for developing adequate occupational health policies. This paper summarizes the workshop sessions and subsequent discussions.

Field study to explore possible effects of styrene on auditory function in exposed workers

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this study to examine, whether occupational styrene exposures are associated with reduced hearing ability.

METHODS

The auditory function was investigated by pure tone audiometry and registration of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) in 32 workers of a fibre-reinforced plastic boat building factory. Sixteen subjects were laminators (mean age: 41 yr (SD: 8)) and therefore regularly exposed to styrene with mean duration of exposure to styrene of 7.5 yr (SD 5.0). The tests were applied to a reference group of 16 workers (mean age: 39 yr (SD: 8)) who were not directly exposed to styrene but had a similar noise exposure.

RESULTS

A few and isolated correlations between the parameters of hearing acuity and exposure indices, such as current internal styrene exposures (sum of MA and PGA) and duration of styrene exposure, were statistically significant, but no consistent association was found.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study do not support the assumption of an ototoxic effect of chronic styrene exposure in workers.

The ototoxicity of styrene: a review of occupational investigations

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to review critically a number of occupational investigations of the exposure and effect relation between inhaled styrene vapour and hearing loss. There is concern that workers' hearing may be impaired by exposure to styrene, as used in industries making plastics and fibreglass-reinforced products.

METHODS

Seven occupational studies, each dealing with the ototoxicity of styrene, were examined. Factors assessed included the experimental design and number of subjects within exposure groups, measurement of the styrene-in-air concentration, confirmation of the styrene exposure by blood or urine analysis, determination of the hearing threshold levels for the exposure and control groups, and measurement of any occupational noise in the subjects' workplaces. Consideration was also given to statistical relations between high-frequency hearing loss and lifetime exposure indices for styrene and noise.

RESULTS

The results are equivocal. Four investigations failed to find any effect of styrene on hearing thresholds. In contrast, other investigations claimed to have demonstrated styrene-induced hearing loss in industrial populations, with synergism between styrene and noise. However, these reports exhibited shortcomings of experimental design and data analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the body of evidence as a whole, hearing deficits due to occupational exposure to styrene at low concentrations have not been demonstrated by scientifically reliable argument. There is some suggestion of an association between styrene exposure, occupational noise, and hearing dysfunction. Further studies in humans are necessary to clarify this question.

Combined effects of noise and mixed solvents exposure on the hearing function among workers in the aviation industry

This study aims to evaluate the effect of occupational exposure to noise and organic solvents on hearing loss in the aviation industry. The study population comprised 542 male workers, who worked in avionics jobs in Kimhae, Korea, who kept records of work environment evaluations and medical examinations. The Cumulative Exposure Index (CEI) was constructed to assess the lifetime cumulative exposure of the workers, and pure tone audiometry (PTA) data of the workers from their biannual medical surveillance was used to assess hearing loss. The prevalence of hearing loss found in the group exposed to noise and mixed solvents simultaneously (54.9%) was higher than those in the other groups (6.0% in the unexposed, 17.1% in the noise-only, and 27.8 % in the exposed to only a solvents mixture). The relative risks, adjusted for age, were estimated to be 4.3 (95 % CI 1.7-10.8) for the noise-only group, 8.1 (95% CI 2.0-32.5) for the noise and solvents group, and 2.6 (95 % CI 0.6-10.3) for the solvents-mixture group. These suggest that chronic exposure to mixed solvents had a toxic effect on the auditory system. This raises the issue of whether hearing conservation regulations should be applied to all workers exposed to solvents.

Exacerbation of noise-induced hearing loss by co-exposure to workplace chemicals

BACKGROUND

: Numerous organic solvents applied in industry, like toluene, styrene, xylene and n-hexane have been demonstrated to impair hearing in animals. However, the effects of exposure to a given organic solvent and the interaction of noise and solvents on hearing in humans are still not fully recognized.

STUDY DESIGN

: The study was aimed to assess the effects of occupational exposure to solvents alone or in combination with noise on hearing in 1117 employees of yacht, ship, plastic, shoe, and paint and lacquer industry. These persons were exposed either to the mixture of organic solvents with xylene as the main component, or predominantly to styrene, or to the mixture of n-hexane and toluene. Detailed questionnaire data and pure-tone audiometry were compared with data of the reference group that included white collar workers, exposed neither to solvents nor noise and metal factory workers exposed to noise only. In all statistics, the confounding factors were recognized as gender, age, exposure to noise, and other variables occurring at a different rate in study and reference group.

RESULTS

: Odds ratio (OR) of hearing loss related with the particular exposure to chemicals was 2.4 (95%CI 1.59-3.74) in case of solvent mixture, 3.9 (95%CI 2.4-6.2) in case of styrene and 5.3 (95%CI 2.6-10.9) in case of n-hexane and toluene exposure. The odds of developing hearing loss substantially increased in the case of combined exposure to organic solvents and noise as compared to isolated exposure to each of these hazards. The highest OR (over 20-fold) was demonstrated in subgroups of subjects exposed simultaneously to noise and two ototoxic solvents (i.e. styrene and toluene or n-hexane and toluene). The mean hearing thresholds were significantly higher in the solvent-exposed groups than in the reference group. The differences in thresholds were observed at high frequencies in the solvent mixture- and n-hexane + toluene-exposed groups and at all frequencies in the styrene-exposed group. A positive linear relationship existed between exposure to solvents and hearing thresholds at high frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

: The results of the study provide the epidemiological evidence that exposure to organic solvents in humans is associated with an increased risk of hearing loss. The simultaneous exposure to organic solvents and noise seems to enhance the hearing deficit if compared with isolated exposures.

Occupational exposure to chemicals and sensory organs: a neglected research field

The effect of industrial chemicals on the sensory perception of exposed workers has received scant attention from the medical community to date, and the scientific literature is mainly limited to some case-reports or isolated studies. Possible explanations for this include the complexity of sensory perception, and the lack of agreement among researchers on methods for testing large groups of subjects. Nevertheless, some published studies showed that vision, hearing and olfactory function can be affected by various industrial metals and solvents, and some data exist also for touch and taste. This review discusses the main industrial chemicals involved. The pathogenesis of the toxicity of chemicals to sensory perception may be related to an action on receptors, nerve fibers, and/or the brain; probably, different pathogenetic mechanisms are involved. One of the main problems in this research field is that most of the studies to date evaluated the effect of a single industrial chemical on a single sense: as an example, we know that styrene exposure can impair smell and also hearing and vision but we have little idea whether different senses are impaired in the same worker, or whether each impairment is independent. In addition, workers are frequently exposed to different chemicals: co-exposure may have no effect, or result in both an increase or a decrease of the effect, as was observed for hearing loss, but studies on this aspect are largely insufficient. Research shows that both occupational and environmental exposure to industrial chemicals can affect sense organs, and suggests that the decline of perception with age may be, at least partly, related to this exposure. Nevertheless, available evidence is incomplete, and is largely inadequate for an estimation of a "safe" threshold of exposure. Good quality further research in this field is needed. This is certainly complex and demands adequate resources, but is justified by the ultimate result: the possibility to prevent an avoidable part of the decline in sensory function with age.

The ototoxic interaction of styrene and noise

The interaction between noise and inhaled styrene on the structure and function of the auditory organ of the male Wistar rat was studied. The animals were exposed either to 600 ppm, 300 ppm or 100 ppm styrene (12 h/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks) alone or in combination with a simultaneous 100-105 dB industrial noise stimulant. Auditory sensitivity was tested by auditory brainstem audiometry at 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 kHz frequencies. Inner ear changes were studied by light microscopy. Exposure to 600 ppm styrene alone caused a 3 dB hearing loss only at the highest test frequency (8 kHz). Quantitative morphological analysis of cochlear hair cells (cytocochleograms) showed a severe outer hair cell (OHC) loss particularly in the third OHC row of the upper basal and lower middle coil. Exposure to noise alone caused only a mild hearing loss (2-9 dB), and only an occasional loss of OHCs (<1% missing). Exposure to the combination of noise and 600 ppm styrene caused a moderate flat hearing loss of 23-27 dB. The cytocochleograms showed a more severe damage of the OHCs than after exposure to 600 ppm styrene alone. The inner hair cells were found to be destroyed in some animals in the upper basal turn only after the combination exposure. Only in combination with noise exposure, the lower styrene concentrations (100 and 300 ppm) induced a hearing loss which was equivalent to that seen after exposure to noise alone. We conclude that: (1) There is an ototoxic interaction between styrene and noise. (2) Synergism is manifested only if styrene is applied in concentrations above the critical level (between 300 and 600 ppm in this study).

Ototoxic effects of occupational exposure to styrene and co-exposure to styrene and noise

Ototoxicity of styrene and the synergistic action of styrene and noise have been shown in rats. The respective data in humans are scarce and equivocal. This study evaluated the effects of occupational exposure to styrene and combined exposures to styrene and noise on hearing. The study group, comprised of 290-yacht yard and plastic factory workers, was exposed to a mixture of organic solvents, having styrene as its main compound. The reference group, totaling 223 subjects, included (1) white-collar workers, exposed neither to solvents nor noise and (2) metal factory workers, exposed exclusively to noise. All subjects were assessed by means of a detailed questionnaire and underwent otorhinolaryngological and audiometric examinations. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed almost a 4-fold (or 3.9; 95% CI = 2.4-6.2) increase in the odds of developing hearing loss related to styrene exposure. The factors adjusted for were: age, gender, current occupational exposure to noise, and exposure to noise in the past. In cases of the combined exposures to styrene and noise, the odds ratios were two to three times higher than the respective values for styrene-only and noise-only exposed subjects. The mean hearing thresholds--adjusted for age, gender, and exposure to noise--were significantly higher in the solvent-exposed group than in the unexposed reference group at all frequencies tested. A positive linear relationship existed between an averaged working life exposure to styrene concentration and a hearing threshold at the frequencies of 6 and 8 kHz. This study provides the epidemiological evidence that occupational exposure to styrene is related to an increased risk of hearing loss. Combined exposures to noise and styrene seem to be more ototoxic than exposure to noise alone.

Solvent ototoxicity in the rat and guinea pig

There is clear evidence that aromatic solvents can disrupt the auditory system in humans and animals. As far as animal models are concerned, solvent-induced hearing loss seems to be species-dependent. Indeed, most published data have been obtained with the rat, which shows mid-frequency cochlear deficits, whereas the guinea pig does not show any permanent hearing loss after solvent exposure. In the current investigation, the effects of two solvents, toluene (600 ppm) and styrene (1000 ppm), were studied in both Long-Evans rats and pigmented guinea pigs exposed 6 h/day for 5 consecutive days. Cochlear function was tested by using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) measured prior to the solvent exposure, 20 min after the end of the exposure and successively at 2 and 4 weeks post-exposure. In addition to cochlear testing, solvent concentrations in blood and urinary metabolites were measured. A cochlear histological analysis was performed at the end of the experiment. No decrease in DPOAE amplitude was observed in the guinea pig, even immediately following the end of exposure. The rat model showed severe disruption of auditory function and cochlear pathology, whereas the guinea pig had no disruption of DPOAE or cochlear pathological alterations. Therefore, the vulnerability of the cochlear function was strictly dependent on the species. As expected, an important difference in the styrene concentration in blood was observed: the solvent concentrations were fourfold higher in the rat than in the guinea pig. Therefore, it is clear that a pharmacokinetic or an uptake difference might explain the difference in susceptibility observed between the two species. Moreover, the metabolism pathways of the solvents were different depending on the species. Attempts to explain differences of vulnerability between the rat and guinea pig are addressed in the present paper.

Audiometric findings in workers exposed to low levels of styrene and noise

Audiometry and exposure measurements were conducted on workers from fiberglass and metal products manufacturing plants and a mail distribution terminal (N = 313). Workers exposed to noise and styrene had significantly worse pure-tone thresholds at 2, 3, 4, and 6 kHz when compared with noise-exposed or nonexposed workers. Age, noise exposure, and urinary mandelic acid (a biologic marker for styrene) were the variables that met the significance level criterion in the multiple logistic regression. The odds ratios for hearing loss were 1.19 for each increment of 1 year of age (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.28), 1.18 for every decibel >85 dB(A) of noise exposure (95% CI, 1.01-1.34), and 2.44 for each millimole of mandelic acid per gram of creatinine in urine (95% CI, 1.01-5.89). Our findings suggest that exposure to styrene even below recommended values had a toxic effect on the auditory system.

Use of DPOAEs for assessing hearing loss caused by styrene in the rat

The study was carried out to test whether or not cubic distortion otoacoustic emissions were more sensitive than auditory-evoked potentials for assessing styrene-induced hearing losses in the Long-Evans rat. For the purposes of comparison, changes in cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DeltaDPOAE), evoked potential permanent threshold shifts (PTS) and outer hair cell losses were measured in a population of styrene-treated rats. Each rat was exposed to either 650 or 750 ppm of styrene for 4 weeks, 5 days per week, 6 h per day. Only the 750 ppm exposure caused significant hearing losses. For this concentration, DPOAEs appeared as sensitive to styrene as the audiometry performed with evoked potentials, but not more. A high coefficient of correlation [0.84< or =r< or =0.91] between DeltaDPOAE and PTS was obtained across the styrene-induced effects for frequencies ranging from 5 to 12 kHz. This experiment demonstrates that DPOAEs can be used to monitor the ototoxicity induced by styrene even though they cannot be considered as a more sensitive index of cochlear pathology than the evoked potentials, at least under our experimental conditions. Likewise evoked potentials, normal DPOAEs may not guarantee a normal cochlear status and therefore results of DPOAE measurements should be interpreted cautiously. The use of both techniques and the determination of the ratio DeltaDPOAE/PTS may be useful in determining the cause of hearing loss: mechanical or chemical process. Moreover, because of its non-invasive and objective characteristics, the use of DPOAEs could play a greater role in a prevention policy.

Simultaneous exposure to ethyl benzene and noise: synergistic effects on outer hair cells

The effects on hearing of simultaneous exposure to the ototoxic organic solvent ethyl benzene and broad-band noise were evaluated in rats. The effects of three ethyl benzene concentrations (0, 300 or 400 ppm) and three noise levels (95 or 105 dB(lin) SPL or background noise at 65 dB(lin) SPL) and all their combinations were investigated for a 5 day exposure at 8 h/day. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and compound action potentials were affected after 105 dB noise alone, and after 105 dB noise in combination with ethyl benzene (300 and 400 ppm). However, the amount of loss for these combinations did not exceed the loss for 105 dB noise alone. Outer hair cell (OHC) loss after exposure to 300 ppm ethyl benzene was located in the third row of OHCs. At 400 ppm, the loss spread out to the second and first row of OHCs. Noise alone hardly affected the OHC counts except for a minor loss in the first row of OHCs after 105 dB SPL. Noise at 105 dB in combination with ethyl benzene at 300 and 400 ppm, however, showed OHC loss greater than the sum of the losses induced by noise and ethyl benzene alone.

Styrene-induced hearing loss: a membrane insult

Styrene is an aromatic solvent widely used as a precursor for polystyrene plastics in many factories which produce glass-reinforced plastic. This solvent has been shown to disrupt the auditory system in both humans and animals. In order to study the sequence of events which could explain the cochlear impairments, a time course experiment was carried out with 6-month-old rats. Male Long Evans rats were exposed to 1000 ppm styrene for 6 h/day, 5 days/week, for either 1, 2, 3, or 4 consecutive weeks. Auditory function was tested by recording the near field evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus, and histological analyses of the cochleae were performed with light and transmission electron microscopy. The electrophysiological results support a toxic mid-frequency process which keeps worsening even after the end of the exposure. The histological findings demonstrate that supporting cells are the first targets of the solvent. Then, the outer hair cells of the third row (OHC3) are disrupted, followed successively by OHC2 and OHC1 from the basal (20 kHz) to the upper turn (4 kHz) of the cochlea. Basically, the disorganization of the membranous structures could be the starting point for the cochlear injury induced by styrene. This paper presents a hypothesis that the accumulation of K+ in the spaces of Nuel underlies the toxic effects of styrene.

Combined effects of noise and styrene exposure on hearing function in the rat

Combined exposure to both noise and aromatic solvents such as styrene is common in many industries. In order to study the combined effects of simultaneous exposure to both noise and styrene on hearing, male adult Long-Evans rats were exposed either to 750 ppm styrene alone, to a 97 dB SPL octave band of noise centered at 8 kHz, or to a combination of noise and styrene. The exposure duration was 6 h/day, 5 days/week, for 4 consecutive weeks. Auditory function was tested over a frequency range from 2 to 32 kHz by recording near field potentials from the inferior colliculus, whereas histopathological analyses of the cochleae were performed with conventional morphometric approaches. Whereas both noise and styrene each caused permanent threshold shifts, the mechanisms of cochlear damage were different. Noise-induced hearing loss was mainly related to injuries of the stereocilia, whereas styrene-induced hearing loss was related to outer hair cell losses. Following the combined exposure, the threshold elevations as well as the cell losses exceeded the summed loss caused by noise and by styrene alone in the range of 8-16 kHz. Therefore, these results suggest that the two ototoxicants can cause a permanent synergistic loss of auditory sensitivity.

The ototoxic effects of ethyl benzene in rats

Exposure to organic solvents has been shown to be ototoxic in animals and there is evidence that these solvents can induce hearing loss in humans. In this study, the effects of inhalation of the possibly ototoxic solvent ethyl benzene on the cochlear function and morphology were evaluated using three complementary techniques: (1) reflex modification audiometry (RMA), (2) electrocochleography and (3) histological examination of the cochleas. Rats were exposed to either ethyl benzene (800 ppm, 8 h/day for 5 days) or to control conditions. The RMA threshold increased significantly by about 25 dB, 1 and 4 weeks after the exposure, irrespective of the stimulus frequency tested (4-24 kHz). Electrocochleography was performed between 8 and 11 weeks after exposure to the organic solvent. The threshold for the compound action potential increased significantly by 10-30 dB at all frequencies tested (1-24 kHz). Histological examination of the cochlea showed outer hair cell (OHC) loss, especially in the upper basal and lower middle turns (corresponding to the mid-frequency region) to an extent of 65%. We conclude that exposure to 800 ppm ethyl benzene for 8 h/day during 5 days induces hearing loss in rats due to OHC loss.

Evaluation of organic solvent ototoxicity by the upper limit of hearing

To clarify the effects of organic solvents on hearing, we measured the upper limit of hearing in 93 male workers exposed to organic solvents in 7 factories that produced plastic buttons or baths. Medical examinations, environmental monitoring (i.e., concentration in breathing-zone air), and biological monitoring (i.e., concentration in urine) of the organic solvents were also done. Although the organic solvent concentrations in the environmental monitoring were lower than the occupational exposure limit, the upper limit of hearing was reduced in workers who were exposed for 5 y or more. This reduction was dose-dependent and was related to styrene concentrations in breathing-zone air and mandelic acid concentrations in urine. Even individuals who had normal medical examinations showed a reduced upper limit of hearing. The upper limit of hearing may serve as an early detection indicator of health effects in workers constantly exposed to styrene.