The expanding role of tandem mass spectrometry in optimizing diagnosis and treatment of thyroid disease

The relevance of T3 in the management of hypothyroidism

Levothyroxine monotherapy has been the standard of care for treatment of hypothyroidism for more than 40 years. However, patients treated with levothyroxine have relatively lower serum tri-iodothyronine (T₃) concentrations than the general population, and symptoms of hypothyroidism persist for some patients despite normalisation of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations. The understanding that maintenance of normal T₃ concentrations is the priority for the thyroid axis has redirected the clinical focus to serum T₃ concentrations in patients with hypothyroidism. This Personal View explores whether it is currently feasible to identify patients who could be considered for liothyronine supplementation in combination with levothyroxine. Genetic profiling stands out as a potential future tool to identify patients who do not respond well to levothyroxine due to suboptimal peripheral thyroxine (T₄) activation. Moreover, new slow-release liothyronine preparations are being developed to be trialled in these symptomatic patients, in an attempt to restore T₃ concentrations and provide conclusive results for the use of T₄ plus T₃ combination therapy.

Development of a functional impedimetric immunosensor for accurate detection of thyroid-stimulating hormone

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), which regulates the synthesis of thyroid gland hormones affecting the whole metabolism, is a pituitary hormone. Determination of TSH is crucial for monitoring thyroid gland-related disorders and some metabolic diseases.In this study, a nonlabeled immunosensor based on covalent immobilization of anti-TSH antibody by using the formation of self-assembled monolayers (SAM) of 4-mercaptophenylacetic acid (4-MPA) and functionalization of carboxyl ends with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimetilaminopropil) carbodiimide (EDC)/N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) was fabricated for detection of TSH. Immobilization steps including the concentration of 4-MPA, the concentration of anti-TSH antibody, and duration of anti-TSH antibody incubation were optimized by utilizing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Under optimal conditions, a sensitive, rapid, and accurate determination of TSH at a concentration range between 0.7 and 3.5 mIU/L was accomplished with a notable linearity and LOD value of 0.034 mIU/L, as well as reproducibility and repeatability. Moreover, for comparison, linear range experiments were also carried out by using other electrochemical methods, including linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry, and capacitance spectroscopy. Finally, the constructed immunosensor was used for analyzing TSH levels spiked in the artificial serum samples.

Reference Intervals of Thyroid Function Tests Assessed by Immunoassay and Mass Spectrometry in Healthy Pregnant Women Living in Catalonia

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines recommend establishing a local reference interval (RI) for thyroid function. We aimed to establish trimester-specific RIs for thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) in a cohort of healthy pregnant women in Catalonia (Spain).

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted with 332 healthy pregnant women, from the first trimester (1T) to delivery. TSH was measured using an Architect^® immunoassay (Abbott) and FT4 by two immunoassays, Architect^® (Abbott) and Cobas^® (Roche), in the three trimesters. FT4 was also measured by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) in the 1T.

RESULTS

TSH (µUI/mL) increased throughout pregnancy (1T: 0.03-3.78; 2T: 0.51-3.53; 3T: 0.50-4.32; p < 0.0001) and FT4 (pmol/L) progressively decreased (Architect^® 1T: 10.42-15.96; 2T: 8.37-12.74; 3T: 8.24-12.49; p < 0.0001; and Cobas^®: 1T: 11.46-19.05; 2T: 9.65-14.67; 3T: 8.88-14.54; p < 0.0067). The FT4 RI during 1T determined LC/MS/MS was 8.75-18.27. Despite the 1T FT4 results measured by LC/MS/MS and with the two immunoassays being significantly correlated, the results obtained by the three methods were found to be non-interchangeable.

CONCLUSIONS

We established trimester-specific RIs for TSH and for FT4 with immunoassays in our population. We also validated the 1T FT4 using LC/MS/MS to confirm the results of FT4 lower than the 2.5th percentile or higher than the 97.5th percentile.

The effect of specific binding proteins on immunoassay measurements of total and free thyroid hormones and cortisol

BACKGROUND

Immunoassay (IA) measurements of thyroid hormones have previously given inaccurate results of triiodothyronine (T3), free triiodothyronine (FT3), and free thyroxine (FT4) when concentrations of TBG are low. We evaluate the hypothesis that abnormal concentrations of specific binding proteins (BPs) affect IA measurements and provide results which might misguide the diagnosis and treatment of patients. This study assesses IAs for the measurement of T3, FT3, and cortisol when levels of TBG and CBG are high or low. Comparisons are made between IA and LC-MS/MS.

METHODS

Serum or plasma samples with high (>95th percentile, n = 25) or low (<5th percentile, n = 27) concentrations of BP were collected. The concentrations of T3, FT3, and cortisol were measured by validated IA and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank analyses were used to compare the two methods.

RESULTS

When TBG levels are <5th percentile, the differences between the IA and LC-MS/MS results for T3 and FT3 are statistically significant (T3, p = 0.0011; FT3, p = 0.0003). When CBG levels are >95th percentile, the difference between the IA and LC-MS/MS measurements of cortisol is statistically significant (p = <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Abnormal BP concentrations appear to affect the accuracy of IA measurements of T3, FT3, and cortisol. The population of patients with either high or low levels of BPs is significant. Our samples reflect that 65% of women aged between 15 and 49 years are taking oral contraceptives in the US, and thus have elevated levels of BPs. In this group, IA results for cortisol are falsely low. Our samples reflect that patients with protein losing diseases have low BP concentrations. Among a group with renal complications, IA measurements of T3 are overestimated, while those of FT3 are underestimated. Are the Food and Drug Administration and diagnostic companies adequately assessing the accuracy of IA tests?

Global FT4 immunoassay standardization: an expert opinion review

OBJECTIVES

Results can vary between different free thyroxine (FT4) assays; global standardization would improve comparability of results between laboratories, allowing development of common clinical decision limits in evidence-based guidelines.

CONTENT

We summarize the path to standardization of FT4 assays, and challenges associated with FT4 testing in special populations, including the need for collaborative efforts toward establishing population-specific reference intervals. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests has undertaken FT4 immunoassay method comparison and recalibration studies and developed a reference measurement procedure that is currently being validated. Further studies are needed to establish common reference intervals/clinical decision limits. Standardization of FT4 assays will change test results substantially; therefore, a major education program will be required to ensure stakeholders are aware of the benefits of FT4 standardization, planned transition procedure, and potential clinical impact of the changes. Assay recalibration by manufacturers and approval process simplification by regulatory authorities will help minimize the clinical impact of standardization.

SUMMARY

Significant progress has been made toward standardization of FT4 testing, but technical and logistical challenges remain.

OUTLOOK

Collaborative efforts by manufacturers, laboratories, and clinicians are required to achieve successful global standardization of the FT4 assays.

Vitamin D Binding Protein and the Biological Activity of Vitamin D

Vitamin D has a long-established role in bone health. In the last two decades, there has been a dramatic resurgence in research interest in vitamin D due to studies that have shown its possible benefits for non-skeletal health. Underpinning the renewed interest in vitamin D was the identification of the vital role of intracrine or localized, tissue-specific, conversion of inactive pro-hormone 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] to active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)₂D]. This intracrine mechanism is the likely driving force behind vitamin D action resulting in positive effects on human health. To fully capture the effect of this localized, tissue-specific conversion to 1,25(OH)₂D, adequate 25(OH)D would be required. As such, low serum concentrations of 25(OH)D would compromise intracrine generation of 1,25(OH)₂D within target tissues. Consistent with this is the observation that all adverse human health consequences of vitamin D deficiency are associated with a low serum 25(OH)D level and not with low 1,25(OH)₂D concentrations. Thus, clinical investigators have sought to define what concentration of serum 25(OH)D constitutes adequate vitamin D status. However, since 25(OH)D is transported in serum bound primarily to vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and secondarily to albumin, is the total 25(OH)D (bound plus free) or the unbound free 25(OH)D the crucial determinant of the non-classical actions of vitamin D? While DBP-bound-25(OH)D is important for renal handling of 25(OH)D and endocrine synthesis of 1,25(OH)₂D, how does DBP impact extra-renal synthesis of 1,25(OH)₂D and subsequent 1,25(OH)₂D actions? Are their pathophysiological contexts where total 25(OH)D and free 25(OH)D would diverge in value as a marker of vitamin D status? This review aims to introduce and discuss the concept of free 25(OH)D, the molecular biology and biochemistry of vitamin D and DBP that provides the context for free 25(OH)D, and surveys in vitro, animal, and human studies taking free 25(OH)D into consideration.

Avoiding the pitfalls when quantifying thyroid hormones and their metabolites using mass spectrometric methods: The role of quality assurance

This short review aims to assess the application of basic quality assurance (QA) principles in published thyroid hormone bioanalytical methods using mass spectrometry (MS). The use of tandem MS, in particular linked to liquid chromatography has become an essential bioanalytical tool for the thyroid hormone research community. Although basic research laboratories do not usually work within the constraints of a quality management system and regulated environment, all of the reviewed publications, to a lesser or greater extent, document the application of QA principles to the MS methods described. After a brief description of the history of MS in thyroid hormone analysis, the article reviews the application of QA to published bioanalytical methods from the perspective of selectivity, accuracy, precision, recovery, instrument calibration, matrix effects, sensitivity and sample stability. During the last decade the emphasis has shifted from developing methods for the determination of L-thyroxine (T₄) and 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine (T₃), present in blood serum/plasma in the 1-100 nM concentration range, to metabolites such as 3-iodo-L-thyronamine (3-T₁AM), 3,5-diiodo-L-thyronine (3,5-T₂) and 3,3'-diiodo-L-thyronine (3,3'-T₂). These metabolites seem likely to be present in the low pM concentrations; consequently, QA parameters such as selectivity and sensitivity become more critical. The authors conclude that improvements, particularly in the areas of analyte selectivity, matrix effect measurement/documentation and analyte recovery would be beneficial.

DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: How reliable are free thyroid and total T3 hormone assays?

Hypothyroidism is a very common disorder worldwide, for which the usual treatment is monotherapy with levothyroxine (L-T₄). However, a number of patients treated with L-T₄ continue to report symptoms of hypothyroidism despite seemingly normal levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free-T₃ (FT₃) and free-T₄ (FT₄) measured by immunoassay. This review summarizes the limitations of the immunoassays commonly used to measure thyroid hormone levels and emphasizes the advantages of the role of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Immunoassays for free thyroid hormone are affected by alterations in serum binding proteins that occur in many physiological and disease states. Multiple studies show falsely normal values for T₃, FT₃ and FT₄ by immunoassay that are below the reference interval when measured by (ultrafiltration) LC-MS/MS, a reference method. We suggest evaluation of thyroid hormone levels by ultrafiltration LC-MS/MS for patients who continue to experience hypothyroid symptoms on LT-4. This may help identify the approximately 20% subset of patients who would benefit from addition of T₃ to their treatment regimen (combination therapy).

Assessment of thyroid function in intensive care unit patients by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods

OBJECTIVES

Patients with non-thyroidal illness syndrome have many abnormalities in thyroid hormone tests. Such patients have medical comorbidities associated with low serum proteins and are on multiple medications that interfere with thyroid hormone measurement by immunoassay platforms. It is unknown if these thyroid hormone measurements reflect physiologic conditions or if they are artifacts of testing methodology.

METHODS

Fifty patients were selected from the intensive care unit (ICU) from our institution. Total and free thyroid hormones in plasma were measured by gold standard liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS). The results were compared to the Roche Cobas 6000. Patient medical comorbidities and binding protein levels were assessed.

RESULTS

Concentrations of total 3,5,5'-triidothyronine (TT3) and total thyroxine (TT4) were significantly more likely to be low by LC-MSMS compared to immunoassay. Free 3,5,5'-triidothyronine (FT3) levels were similar by immunoassay and LC-MSMS. However, FT4 concentrations were mildly elevated for many patients when measured by ultrafiltration LC-MSMS (19/50, 38%) compared to 1/50 (2%) when measured by immunoassay (p=0.0001). Decreased albumin and thyroxine binding globulin were common and patients were on an average of 11.7±5.0 medications, all factors known to interfere with results found on immunoassays.

CONCLUSIONS

Marked discrepancies in thyroid hormone measurement were noted between reference LC-MSMS and a common immunoassay platform. It is hypothesized that T4 binding to low affinity albumin is displaced by several drugs, raising concentrations of FT4 by LC-MSMS compared to immunoassay, and that the immunoassay values are falsely decreased due to low binding proteins in our patient population.

Advances in Clinical Mass Spectrometry

Although mass spectrometry has been used clinically for decades, the advent of immunoassay technology moved the clinical laboratory to more labor saving automated platforms requiring little if any sample preparation. It became clear, however, that immunoassays lacked sufficient sensitivity and specificity necessary for measurement of certain analytes or for measurement of analytes in specific patient populations. This limitation prompted clinical laboratories to revisit mass spectrometry which could additionally be used to develop assays for which there was no commercial source. In this chapter, the clinical applications of mass spectrometry in therapeutic drug monitoring, toxicology, and steroid hormone analysis will be reviewed. Technologic advances and new clinical applications will also be discussed.

Reference intervals of thyroid hormones in a previously iodine-deficient but presently more than adequate area of Western China: a population-based survey

The aim of our study is to establish the reference intervals (RIs) of thyroid hormones in a previously iodine-deficient area but presently more than iodine-adequate area of Western China, and also to investigate the factors which affect thyroid function. The cross-sectional study conducted in Xi'an, was based on 2007-2008 China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Survey. Among 1286 participating adults, 717 were finally included as reference population. Thyrotropin (TSH), total triiodothyronine (T3), free triiodothyronine (FT3), total thyroxine (T4), free thyroxine (FT4), thyroperoxidase antibody (TPO-Ab) and thyroglobulin antibody (Tg-Ab) were measured. Thyroid ultrasound examination was also performed. The present study established the new RIs of serum TSH (0.43-5.51 mIU/L), FT4 (11.0-20.4 pmol/L), FT3 (3.63-5.73 pmol/L), T4 (67.8-157 mmol/L) and T3 (1.08-2.20 mmol/L), which were different from the data provided by the manufacturers. Significant differences among all the age groups were observed in FT3, but neither in TSH nor in FT4. The TSH levels in adults with pathologic ultrasonography results or positive thyroid autoantibody were significantly higher than those in reference adults. Our present results provide valuable references for the diagnosis of thyroid diseases in population of Western China. Considering that most inland areas of China have faced the challenge of the transition from iodine deficiency to adequacy or more than adequacy, we recommend physicians utilize our RIs to determine thyroid diseases in the similar areas with Xi'an in China.

Is measurement of TT3 by immunoassay reliable at low concentrations? A comparison of the Roche Cobas 6000 vs. LC-MSMS

OBJECTIVES

Thyroid dysfunction is a common medical condition affecting an estimated 30 million people in the US alone. Employing gold standard Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS) methods we have examined the extent of inaccuracy of immunoassay (IA) measurement for total T3 (TT3) at low, normal and high concentrations.

DESIGN AND METHODS

268 TT3 Roche Cobas 6000 immunoassay TT3 values (covering the low, normal, and high ranges) were compared with LC-MSMS results.

RESULTS

At TT3 concentrations between 50 and 113ng/dL (conversion factor for TT3 to SI Units is ng/dL×0.0154=nmol/L), n=122, LC-MSMS values were lower than immunoassay with 72% found to be below the 2.5th percentile by LC-MSMS compared to 27% for immunoassay. Strikingly 45% of the patients classified as normal TT3 by immunoassay were defined as lower than the 2.5th percentile by LC-MSMS. Only 38 of the 122 patients with low T3's were not receiving T4. In this latter group all of whom had TSH's>3.7mIU/L, 74% of results by LC-MSMS were below the 2.5th percentile while only 21% were below the 2.5th percentile by IA. The clinical consequences of these inaccuracies may affect whether dosing with T4 or combination of T4 with T3 is selected for treatment. Finally the correlation of TT3 with TSH was far superior when TT3 was measured by LC-MSMS. A typical case which demonstrates our message is included.

CONCLUSION

T3 being the active hormone needs to be reliably measured and if the patient has low TT3 and hypothyroid symptoms persist; treatment with T3 should be considered. A typical case report is included to illustrate the problems of inaccurate immunoassay results for TT3. Measurement of TT3 by immunoassay at low concentrations is less than optimal and often provides the clinician with a normal result when the LC-MSMS method and the patient's clinical condition suggests that supplementation with T3 (as in combination therapy) may be required to optimize patient care.

Paediatric reference interval and biological variation trends of thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (T4) in an Asian population

AIMS

To describe the reference intervals and biological variation data for thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) in a mixed Asian population using an indirect sampling approach and to compare them with published reports.

METHODS

TSH and FT4 of children measured once or twice over a 7-year period (2008-2014) at primary-care and tertiary-care settings were extracted from the laboratory information system. After excluding outliers, age-related reference intervals were derived using the Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) approach, while age-partitioned biological variation data were obtained according to recommendations by Fraser and Harris.

RESULTS

Both TSH and FT4 were very high at birth and declined with age. Similarly within-individual and between-individual biological variations were higher for both TSH and FT4 at birth and also declined with age. Our data were broadly similar to previous studies. Significant heterogeneity in study population and methods prohibited direct numerical comparison between this and previously published studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study fills two important gaps in our knowledge of paediatric thyroid function by reporting the centile trends (and reference values) in a mixed Asian population, as well as providing age-partitioned biological variation data. The variation in published reference intervals highlights the difficulty in harmonising paediatric thyroid reference intervals or recommending universal clinical cut-offs.

Reversible morbidity markers in subclinical hypothyroidism

IMPORTANCE

Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is a common clinical entity with a putative role in a wide range of disorders. The impact of SCH on mortality and markers of morbidity has been demonstrated, but studies have shown inconsistent results. Evidence regarding the effect of levothyroxine treatment on reversing morbidity markers is emerging, but the value of treatment is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this review were to assess recent, high-quality studies evaluating the role of SCH in cardiovascular health, cognition, mood, pregnancy, anemia, and renal disease; to examine the effects of levothyroxine on reducing mortality or reversing markers of morbidity in these conditions; and to consider how new research insights may help guide clinical practice.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A PubMed search was conducted (using 'subclinical hypothyroidism' [Title/Abstract] AND morbidity [MeSH Subheading] as search criteria) and was restricted to human studies published in the English language between 1990 and 2013. Subsequent searches of retrieved articles yielded further studies, which were included based on quality. Emphasis was given to large observational studies, well-conducted meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials.

FINDINGS

The difficulty of diagnosing SCH, particularly in the elderly, may underlie many of the conflicting results seen in the literature. Increased understanding of the at-risk patient population will result in better selection of study subjects and, likely, unequivocal results. Regardless of the current confusion, emerging evidence suggests that certain markers of morbidity are reversed by levothyroxine therapy across the disorders examined here.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Future large, well-controlled studies will not only clarify the role of SCH but also help identify patients for whom levothyroxine treatment will provide the most benefit.

Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the american thyroid association task force on thyroid hormone replacement

BACKGROUND

A number of recent advances in our understanding of thyroid physiology may shed light on why some patients feel unwell while taking levothyroxine monotherapy. The purpose of this task force was to review the goals of levothyroxine therapy, the optimal prescription of conventional levothyroxine therapy, the sources of dissatisfaction with levothyroxine therapy, the evidence on treatment alternatives, and the relevant knowledge gaps. We wished to determine whether there are sufficient new data generated by well-designed studies to provide reason to pursue such therapies and change the current standard of care. This document is intended to inform clinical decision-making on thyroid hormone replacement therapy; it is not a replacement for individualized clinical judgment.

METHODS

Task force members identified 24 questions relevant to the treatment of hypothyroidism. The clinical literature relating to each question was then reviewed. Clinical reviews were supplemented, when relevant, with related mechanistic and bench research literature reviews, performed by our team of translational scientists. Ethics reviews were provided, when relevant, by a bioethicist. The responses to questions were formatted, when possible, in the form of a formal clinical recommendation statement. When responses were not suitable for a formal clinical recommendation, a summary response statement without a formal clinical recommendation was developed. For clinical recommendations, the supporting evidence was appraised, and the strength of each clinical recommendation was assessed, using the American College of Physicians system. The final document was organized so that each topic is introduced with a question, followed by a formal clinical recommendation. Stakeholder input was received at a national meeting, with some subsequent refinement of the clinical questions addressed in the document. Consensus was achieved for all recommendations by the task force.

RESULTS

We reviewed the following therapeutic categories: (i) levothyroxine therapy, (ii) non-levothyroxine-based thyroid hormone therapies, and (iii) use of thyroid hormone analogs. The second category included thyroid extracts, synthetic combination therapy, triiodothyronine therapy, and compounded thyroid hormones.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that levothyroxine should remain the standard of care for treating hypothyroidism. We found no consistently strong evidence for the superiority of alternative preparations (e.g., levothyroxine-liothyronine combination therapy, or thyroid extract therapy, or others) over monotherapy with levothyroxine, in improving health outcomes. Some examples of future research needs include the development of superior biomarkers of euthyroidism to supplement thyrotropin measurements, mechanistic research on serum triiodothyronine levels (including effects of age and disease status, relationship with tissue concentrations, as well as potential therapeutic targeting), and long-term outcome clinical trials testing combination therapy or thyroid extracts (including subgroup effects). Additional research is also needed to develop thyroid hormone analogs with a favorable benefit to risk profile.

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory

Clinical laboratory medicine has seen the introduction and evolution of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in routine clinical laboratories over the last 10–15 years. There still exists a wide diversity of assays from very esoteric and highly specialist manual assays to more simplified kit-based assays. The technology is not static as manufacturers are continually making improvements. Mass spectrometry is now commonly used in several areas of diagnostics including therapeutic drug monitoring, toxicology, endocrinology, paediatrics and microbiology. Some of the most high throughput analyses or common analytes include vitamin D, immunosuppressant monitoring, androgen measurement and newborn screening. It also offers flexibility for the measurement of analytes in a variety of different matrices which would prove difficult with immunoassays. Unlike immunoassays or high-pressure liquid chromatography assays using ultraviolet or fluorescence detection, mass spectrometry offers better specificity and reduced interferences if attention is paid to potential isobaric compounds. Furthermore, multiplexing, which enables multiple analytes to be measured with the same volume of serum is advantageous, and the requirement for large sample volumes is decreasing as instrument sensitivity increases. There are many emerging applications in the literature. Using mass spectrometry to identify novel isoforms or modified peptides is possible as is quantification of proteins and peptides, with or without protein digests. Future developments by the manufacturers may also include mechanisms to improve the throughput of samples and strategies to decrease the level of skill required by the operators.

Total and free thyroxine and triiodothyronine: measurement discrepancies, particularly in inpatients

OBJECTIVE

We compared the performance of tandem mass spectrometry versus immunoassay for measuring thyroid hormones in a diverse group of inpatients and outpatients.

METHODS

Thyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3), free thyroxine (FT4), and free triiodothyronine (FT3) were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and immunoassay in 100 patients and the two assays were compared.

RESULTS

T4 and T3 values measured by the two different assays correlated well with each other (r=0.91-0.95). However, the correlation was less good at the extremes (r=0.51-0.75). FT4 and FT3 concentrations measured by the two assays correlated less well with each other (r=0.75 and 0.50 respectively). The studied analytes had poor inverse correlation with the log-transformed TSH values (r=-0.22-0.51) in the population as a whole. The strongest correlations were seen in the groups of outpatients (r=-0.25-0.61). The weakest degree of correlation was noted in the inpatient group, with many correlations actually being positive.

CONCLUSION

The worst between-assay correlation was demonstrated at low and high hormone concentrations, in the very concentration ranges where accurate assay performance is typically most clinically important. Based on the lesser susceptibility of mass spectrometry to interferences from conditions such as binding protein abnormalities, we speculate that mass spectrometry better reflects the clinical situation. In this mixed population of inpatients and outpatients, we also note failure of assays to conform to the anticipated inverse linear relationship between thyroid hormones and log-transformed TSH.

A pilot study: subclinical hypothyroidism and free thyroid hormone measurement by immunoassay and mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroidism is defined as the presence of an elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) with a normal free thyroxine (FT4) level. The commonly used direct analogue immunoassays for the measurement of FT4 have been shown to have poor performance at the upper and lower limits of the FT4 reference interval.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the percentage of individuals classified as having subclinical hypothyroidism with a standard immunoassay, that actually have low free thyroid hormone levels by mass spectrometry measurements.

DESIGN

Outpatient samples with elevated TSH values and normal FT4 concentrations as per standard immunoassay methods were collected. FT4 and free triiodothyronine (FT3) analyses were performed on these samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS

Sixty five percent (n=26) of patients (n=40) had (LC-MS/MS) FT4 or FT3 or both FT4 and FT3 values below mass spectrometry reference limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the direct analogue immunoassay method for FT4 measurement results in a significant proportion of patients being misclassified as having subclinical hypothyroidism.