United States Pediatricians' Attitudes Regarding Public Policies for Low-Income Children and Their Profession's Advocacy Priorities

Social Determinants of Health and Body Mass Index in American Indian/Alaska Native Children

Objective: To examine the associations between social determinants of health (SDOH) and prevalent overweight/obesity status and change in adiposity status among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) children. Methods: The study sample includes 23,950 AI/AN children 2-11 years of age, who used Indian Health Service (IHS) from 2010 to 2014. Multivariate generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the following: (1) cross-sectional associations between SDOH and prevalent overweight/obesity status and (2) longitudinal associations between SDOH and change in adiposity status over time. Results: Approximately 49% of children had prevalent overweight/obesity status; 18% had overweight status and 31% had obesity status. Prevalent severe obesity status was 20% in 6-11-year olds. In adjusted cross-sectional models, children living in counties with higher levels of poverty had 28% higher odds of prevalent overweight/obesity status. In adjusted longitudinal models, children 2-5 years old living in counties with more children eligible for free or reduced-priced lunch had 15% lower odds for transitioning from normal-weight status to overweight/obesity status. Conclusions: This work contributes to accumulating knowledge that economic instability, especially poverty, appears to play a large role in overweight/obesity status in AI/AN children. Research, clinical practice, and policy decisions should aim to address and eliminate economic instability in childhood.

Pediatric provider perspectives and practices regarding health policy discussions with families: a mixed methods study

Background

Advocacy regarding child health policy is a core tenet of pediatrics. Previous research has demonstrated that most pediatric providers believe collective advocacy and political involvement are essential aspects of their profession, but less is known about how pediatric providers engage with families about policy issues that impact child health. The objectives of this study were to examine providers’ perceptions and practices with regards to discussing health policy issues with families and to identify provider characteristics associated with having these discussions.

Methods

In this cross-sectional mixed methods study, pediatric resident physicians, attending physcians, and nurse practitioners at primary care clinics within a large academic health system were surveyed to assess (1) perceived importance of, (2) frequency of, and (3) barriers to and facilitators of health policy discussions with families. Multivariable ordinal regression was used to determine provider characteristics (including demographics, practice location, and extent of civic engagement) associated with frequency of these discussions. A subset of providers participated in subsequent focus groups designed to help interpret quantitative findings.

Results

The overall survey response rate was 155/394 (39%). The majority of respondents (76%) felt pediatricians should talk to families about health policy issues affecting children, but most providers (69%) reported never or rarely having these discussions. Factors associated with discussing policy issues included being an attending physician/nurse practitioner (OR 8.22, 95% CI 2.04–33.1) and urban practice setting (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.03–14.3). Barriers included feeling uninformed about relevant issues and time constraints. In provider focus groups, four key themes emerged: (1) providers felt discussing policy issues would help inform and empower families; (2) providers frequently discussed social service programs, but rarely discussed policies governing these programs; (3) time constraints and concerns about partisan bias were a barrier to conversations; and (4) use of support staff and handouts with information about policy changes could help facilitate more frequent conversations.

Conclusions

Pediatric providers felt it was important to talk to families about child health policy issues, but few providers reported having such conversations in practice. Primary care practices should consider incorporating workflow changes that promote family engagement in relevant health policy discussions.

US Pediatrician Practices and Attitudes Concerning Childhood Obesity: 2006 and 2017

OBJECTIVE

To compare primary care pediatricians' practices and attitudes regarding obesity assessment, prevention, and treatment in children 2 years and older in 2006 and 2017.

STUDY DESIGN

National, random samples of American Academy of Pediatrics members were surveyed in 2006, 2010, and 2017 on practices and attitudes regarding overweight and obesity (analytic n = 655, 592, and 558, respectively). Using logistic regression models (controlling for pediatrician and practice characteristics), we examined survey year with predicted values (PVs), including body mass index (BMI) assessment across 2006, 2010, and 2017 and practices and attitudes in 2006 and 2017.

RESULTS

Pediatrician respondents in 2017 were significantly more likely than in 2006 and 2010 to report calculating and plotting BMI at every well-child visit, with 96% of 2017 pediatricians reporting they do this. Compared with 2006, in 2017 pediatricians were more likely to discuss family behaviors related to screen time, sugar-sweetened beverages, and eating meals together, P < .001 for all. There were no observed differences in frequency of discussions on parental role modeling of nutrition and activity-related behaviors, roles in food selection, and frequency of eating fast foods or eating out. Pediatricians in 2017 were more likely to agree BMI adds new information relevant to medical care (PV = 69.8% and 78.1%), they have support staff for screening (PV = 45.3% and 60.5%), and there are effective means of treating obesity (PV = 36.3% and 56.2%), P < .001 for all.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from cross-sectional surveys in 2006 and 2017 suggest nationwide, practicing pediatricians have increased discussions with families on several behaviors and their awareness and practices around obesity care.