Building Capacity in Pediatric Environmental Health: The Academic Pediatric Association's Professional Development Program

An Update on Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Units: Activities and Impacts, 2015-19

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Units (PEHSUs) address health concerns impacting children and their families related to environmental hazards by providing consultation and education to families, communities, and health care professionals. This analysis evaluated the productivity of the national PEHSU program.

METHODS

PEHSUs reported data on services provided to US communities between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2019. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis are presented.

RESULTS

During this period, 6102 consultations and 4644 educational outreach activities were recorded. PEHSU faculty and staff published 462 articles, reviews, book chapters, fact sheets, commentaries, short informational pieces, and other materials between 2014 and 2019. These included 190 articles in scientific peer-reviewed journals and 29 textbook chapters to increase professional capacity in pediatric and reproductive environmental health. Lead, other metals, substances of abuse, pesticides, mold, and air pollution were frequently reported as agents of concern and educational topics. Requests for an overview of pediatric environmental health and outdoor pollutants were other frequently reported topics.

CONCLUSIONS

PEHSUs work to decrease harmful exposures and improve children's health. They serve as expert resources for families, health care professionals, and communities on health effects related to environmental exposures. Data show the breadth and depth of concerns addressed and demonstrate the productivity and impact of this national program.

Evaluation of academic detailing to educate clinicians regarding childhood lead poisoning prevention: a pilot study

CONTEXT

Environmental exposures are associated with approximately 19% of disease globally, and exposure to neurotoxic chemicals is estimated to cost the United States $50 billion per year. Despite calls from the Institute of Medicine to increase training for clinicians regarding environmental health since the 1990s, there is still little instruction in environmental health for clinicians. This leaves gaps in knowledge that need to be bridged through outreach and education to practicing clinicians. Academic detailing (AD) is an educational intervention associated with improved prescribing practices in healthcare professionals but has not been applied to preventive or environmental health. Childhood lead exposure is a common condition associated with lifetime increased risk of cognitive and behavioral problems. Ohio has more than 2 million homes built before 1978, making exposure to lead-based paint a significant public health problem; however, only 50% of high-risk children are tested for lead. Few receive health promotion information regarding lead poisoning prevention, in part because this is not a part of training for healthcare providers (HCPs).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were twofold: (1) implement a pilot of AD sessions on the topic of childhood lead poisoning prevention with frontline HCPs and their staff in different practice settings; and (2) evaluate the acceptability of these training sessions utilizing quantitative and qualitative methods.

METHODS

Physicians, nurses, social workers, community health workers, and clinical office staff were recruited from clinics who care for children at high risk for lead exposure. Trainings consisting of small group AD style sessions were presented at these sites. Learning objectives included increasing knowledge regarding lead testing requirements, enabling identification of lead's impact on child development and equipping participants to provide anticipatory guidance for parents regarding lead poisoning prevention. Participants provided feedback through an anonymous questionnaire and qualitative feedback.

RESULTS

There were 46 participants (12 physicians in practice/in training, 21 nursing or office staff, and 13 community health or social workers); more than 90% of the participants reported that the training achieved its learning objectives. Small-group presentations were preferred (91%); approximately 39% of participants requested an online format. Participants preferred that the presenters be either a public health or lead clinical expert, and they suggested that future activities include clinical vignettes.

CONCLUSIONS

Academic-detailing style training shows promise in promoting childhood lead poisoning prevention for frontline HCPs.

Building a Community-Centered Public Health Advocacy Training Program for Medical Students

CONTEXT

Public health advocacy is increasingly acknowledged as an essential component of practice in medicine. Medical schools, residency programs, and professional organizations have begun developing curricula in an effort to teach advocacy. This article describes the structuring and evolution of the Dr Pete Dehnel Public Health Advocacy Fellowship, an innovative program prioritizing a community-centered approach to teaching physician advocacy to medical students.

PROGRAM

Created by the Twin Cities Medical Society (TCMS), the fellowship's curriculum adopts a cohort-based learning model organized around skills training, personalized physician-mentor pairing in a shared field of interest, and hands-on advocacy activities. The curriculum also centers insights and practical knowledge from community members who are outside of the health care sphere alongside those of experienced physician-advocates.

IMPLEMENTATION

TCMS partnered with an independent research organization to conduct an ongoing developmental evaluation (DE) of the fellowship. DE focuses on rapid-cycle feedback and utilization of findings to inform the development of program components. This enables TCMS to customize the fellowship's curricular components to the local context and in response to student and mentor feedback.

EVALUATION

Early findings have allowed TCMS to refine curricular components while providing evidence of significant gains in 3 areas of growth among fellows: perceived knowledge and advocacy skills proficiency; perceived self-efficacy; and motivation for lifelong advocacy practice.

DISCUSSION

Key fellowship components, including a flexible curricular structure with built-in adaptability and emphasis on long-term health advocacy engagement, are associated with student growth. These core elements along with a focus on community-centeredness can be integrated into curricula of other programs seeking to train medical learners and physicians to embrace a lifelong commitment to public health advocacy.