Influence of Artifact Corrections on MRI Signal Intensity Ratios for Assessment of Gadolinium Brain Retention

Optimization of Detection of Gadodiamide Brain Retention in Rats Using Quantitative T2 Mapping and Intraperitoneal Administration

BACKGROUND

Currently, the gadolinium retention in the brain after the use of contrast agents is studied by T₁ -weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T₁ w) and T₁ mapping. The former does not provide easily quantifiable data and the latter requires prolonged scanning and is sensitive to motion. T₂ mapping may provide an alternative approach. Animal studies of gadolinium retention are complicated by repeated intravenous (IV) dosing, whereas intraperitoneal (IP) injections might be sufficient.

HYPOTHESIS

T₂ mapping will detect the changes in the rat brain due to gadolinium retention, and IP administration is equivalent to IV for long-term studies.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective longitudinal.

ANIMAL MODEL

A total of 31 Sprague-Dawley rats administered gadodiamide IV (N = 8) or IP (N = 8), or saline IV (N = 6) or IP (N = 9) 4 days per week for 5 weeks.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES

A 7 T, T₁ w, and T₂ mapping.

ASSESSMENT

T₂ relaxation and image intensities in the deep cerebellar nuclei were measured pre-treatment and weekly for 5 weeks. Then brains were assessed for neuropathology (N = 4) or gadolinium content using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, N = 12).

STATISTICAL TESTS

Repeated measures analysis of variance with post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests and Hedges' effect size.

RESULTS

Gadolinium was detected by both approaches; however, T₂ mapping was more sensitive (effect size 2.32 for T₂ vs. 0.95 for T₁ w), and earlier detection (week 3 for T₂ vs. week 4 for T₁ w). ICP-MS confirmed the presence of gadolinium (3.076 ± 0.909 nmol/g in the IV group and 3.948 ± 0.806 nmol/g in the IP group). There was no significant difference between IP and IV groups (ICP-MS, P = 0.109; MRI, P = 0.696). No histopathological abnormalities were detected in any studied animal.

CONCLUSION

T₂ relaxometry detects gadolinium retention in the rat brain after multiple doses of gadodiamide irrespective of the route of administration.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

The Effect of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents on Longitudinal Changes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Intensities and Relaxation Times in the Aging Rat Brain

The aim of the study was to investigate the possible influence of changes in the brain caused by age on relaxometric and relaxation time–weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) and the globus pallidus (GP) of Gd-exposed and control rats over the course of 1 year.

Automated workflow for volumetric assessment of signal intensity ratio on T1-weighted MR images after multiple gadolinium administrations

Purpose: Repeated injections of linear gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) have shown correlations with increased signal intensities (SI) on unenhanced T1-weighted (T1w) images. Assessment is usually performed manually on a single slice and the SI as an average of a freehand region-of-interest is reported. We aim to develop a fully automated software that segments and computes SI ratio of dentate nucleus (DN) to pons (DN/P) and globus pallidus (GP) to thalamus (GP/T) for the assessment of gadolinium presence in the brain after a serial GBCA administrations. Approach: All patients ( N = 113 ) underwent at least eight GBCA enhanced scans. The modal SI in the DN, GP, pons, and thalamus were measured volumetrically on unenhanced T1w images and corrected based on the reference protocol (measurement 1) and compared to the SI-uncorrected-modal-volume (measurement 2), SI-corrected-mean-volume (measurement 3), as well as SI-corrected-modal-single slice (measurement 4) approaches. Results: Automatic processing worked on all 2119 studies (1150 at 1.5 T and 969 at 3 T). DN/P were 1.085 ± 0.048 (1.5 T) and 0.979 ± 0.061 (3 T). GP/T were 1.084 ± 0.039 (1.5 T) and 1.069 ± 0.042 (3 T). Modal DN/P ratios from volumetric assessment at 1.5 T failed to show a statistical difference with or without SI corrections ( p = 0.71 ). All other t -tests demonstrated significant differences (measurement 2, 3, 4 compared to 1, p < 0.001 ). Conclusion: The fully automatic method is an effective powerful tool to streamline the analysis of SI ratios in the deep brain tissues. Divergent SI ratios using different approaches reinforces the need to standardize the measurement for the research in this field.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents: What we learned from acute adverse events, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and brain retention

BACKGROUND

 Radiologists have been administering gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in magnetic resonance imaging for several decades, so that there is abundant experience with these agents regarding allergic-like reactions, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) and gadolinium retention in the brain.

METHODS

 This review is based on a selective literature search and reflects the current state of research on acute adverse effects of GBCA, NSF and brain retention of gadolinium.

RESULTS

 Due to the frequent use of GBCA, data on adverse effects of these compounds are available in large collectives. Allergic-like reactions occurred rarely, whereas severe acute reactions were very rarely observed. Systemic changes in NSF also occur very rarely, although measures to avoid NSF resulted in a significantly reduced incidence of NSF. Due to gadolinium retention in the body after administration of linear MR contrast agents, only macrocyclic preparations are currently used with few exceptions. Clear clinical correlates of gadolinium retention in the brain could not be identified so far. Although the clinical added value of GBCA is undisputed, individual risks associated with the injection of GBCA should be identified and the use of non-contrast enhanced MR techniques should be considered. Alternative contrast agents such as iron oxide nanoparticles are not clinically approved, but are currently undergoing clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

 GBCA have a very good risk profile with a low rate of adverse effects or systemic manifestations such as NSF. Gadolinium retention in the brain can be minimized by the use of macrocyclic GBCA, although clear clinical correlates due to gadolinium retention in the brain following administration of linear GBCA could not be identified yet.

KEY POINTS

· Acute adverse effects are predominantly mild/moderate, rarely severe reactions occur.. · International guidelines resulted in significant reduction of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.. · Application of macrocyclic contrast agents minimizes gadolinium retention in the brain..

CITATION FORMAT

· Bäuerle T, Saake M, Uder M. Gadolinium-based contrast agents: What we learned from acute adverse events, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and brain retention. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 1010 - 1018.