A comparative review of serological assays for the detection of rabies virus-specific antibodies

Analysis of the antigenic and immunogenic properties of the native rabies virus glycoprotein purified by Lens culinaris lectin affinity chromatography

Rabies virus glycoprotein (RABV-G) is responsible for the recognition of specific cell surface receptors and induces the production of neutralizing antibodies (VNA). Since RABV-G is a glycoprotein, this work aimed to evaluate Lens culinaris (LCA) chromatography as a simple and effective purification method. The purity and identification of the protein obtained were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, ELISA and lectin-binding assay. The antigenic properties of the purified RABV-G were evaluated by direct ELISA using human serum samples from individuals who had received rabies pre-exposure vaccination. For the immunogenicity study, Swiss Webster mice were immunized with purified RABV-G and the specific antibodies were measured by direct ELISA and RFFIT. As results, it was observed that the purified protein reveled a molecular mass of 55 kDa and the presence of carbohydrate; additionally, it was recognized by anti-rabies virus glycoprotein monoclonal antibody. Purified RABV-G induced high VNA titers (>50.0 IU/ml) in vivo, as detected by RFFIT, as well as RABV-G specific IgG1 (0.8 mean OD±SD) and IgG2a (0.3 mean OD±SD) antibodies, with a predominance of IgG1 (p< 0.001). In addition, it was observed that RABV-G was efficient in selectively detecting anti- RABV-G IgG in the sera of vaccinated individuals compared to the negative control. Therefore, LCA chromatography was efficient in preserving the native properties of RABV-G that are essential in inducing an adequate humoral immune response. In addition, the purified RABV-G presented analytical potential as an ELISA reagent.

Establishment of serological neutralizing tests using pseudotyped viruses for comprehensive detection of antibodies against all 18 lyssaviruses

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic, neurological disease caused by rabies lyssavirus (RABV) and other lyssaviruses. In this study, we established novel serological neutralizing tests (NT) based on vesicular stomatitis virus pseudotypes possessing all 18 known lyssavirus glycoproteins. Applying this system to comparative NT against rabbit sera immunized with current RABV vaccines, we showed that the current RABV vaccines fail to elicit sufficient neutralizing antibodies against lyssaviruses other than to those in phylogroup I. Furthermore, comparative NT against rabbit antisera for 18 lyssavirus glycoproteins showed glycoproteins of some lyssaviruses elicited neutralizing antibodies against a broad range of lyssaviruses. This novel testing system will be useful to comprehensively detect antibodies against lyssaviruses and evaluate their cross-reactivities for developing a future broad-protective vaccine.

Assessing the Reliability of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Studies That Use Post-Vaccination Sera

Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants is crucial for determining future vaccination strategies and other public health strategies. When clinical effectiveness data are unavailable, a common method of assessing vaccine performance is to utilize neutralization assays using post-vaccination sera. Neutralization studies are typically performed across a wide array of settings, populations and vaccination strategies, and using different methodologies. For any comparison and meta-analysis to be meaningful, the design and methodology of the studies used must at minimum address aspects that confer a certain degree of reliability and comparability. We identified and characterized three important categories in which studies differ (cohort details, assay details and data reporting details) and that can affect the overall reliability and/or usefulness of neutralization assay results. We define reliability as a measure of methodological accuracy, proper study setting concerning subjects, samples and viruses, and reporting quality. Each category comprises a set of several relevant key parameters. To each parameter, we assigned a possible impact (ranging from low to high) on overall study reliability depending on its potential to influence the results. We then developed a reliability assessment tool that assesses the aggregate reliability of a study across all parameters. The reliability assessment tool provides explicit selection criteria for inclusion of comparable studies in meta-analyses of neutralization activity of SARS-CoV-2 variants in post-vaccination sera and can also both guide the design of future neutralization studies and serve as a checklist for including important details on key parameters in publications.