Repeat Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes, Toxicity, and Dosimetric Considerations

Thoracic reirradiation of recurrent non-small cell lung carcinoma: A comprehensive review

Due to the recent advances in the systemic treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, the management of locoregional recurrences, especially after initial radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy), is of increasing significance. The potential alternatives in this setting include: a salvage local strategy (based on surgery, radiotherapy or thermoablative treatment), promising approach, but sometimes difficult to implement in often frail patients, and whose modalities remain under-researched; or alternatively, the initiation of systemic treatment, where the prognosis aligns with that of de novo metastatic patients. This comprehensive literature review focused on salvage radiotherapy treatment of recurrent non-small cell lung carcinomas, after initial radiotherapy, with or without associated systemic treatment. It aims to present the main findings on this area, from patient selection and preparation, to key characteristics, including dosimetric aspects, and the main limitations and uncertainties associated with this therapeutic modality.

Tumor reirradiation: Issues, challenges and perspectives for radiobiology

The radiobiology of tumor reirradiation is poorly understood. It pertains to tumors and their sensitivity at the time of relapse, encompassing primary tumors, metastases, or secondary cancers developed in or proximal to previously irradiated tissues. The ability to control the pathology depends, in part, on understanding this sensitivity. To date, literature data remains limited regarding changes in the radiosensitivity of tissues after initial irradiation, and most proposals are based on conjecture. The response of healthy tissues at the site of irradiation raises concerns about radio-induced complications. Cumulative dose is likely a major factor in this risk, thus using equivalent dose calculations might help reduce the risk of complications. However, the correlation between mathematical equivalence formulas and clinical effects of radiobiological origin is weak, and the lack of knowledge of the alpha/beta (α/β) ratio of healthy tissues remains an obstacle to the extensive use of these formulas. However, tissues exposed to recovery dose may have a tolerance to irradiation much higher than assumed, thus further biological work remains to be developed. Also, the functionality of previously irradiated tissues could be useful in selecting the most suitable irradiation beams. Finally, research on the genomics of irradiated healthy tissues could improve the prediction of side effects and personalize radiotherapy.

FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, mitigates chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone

Background and purpose

The normal tissue sparing afforded by FLASH radiotherapy (RT) is being intensely investigated for potential clinical translation. Here, we studied the effects of FLASH proton RT (F-PRT) in the reirradiation setting, with or without hypofractionation. Chronic toxicities in three murine models of normal tissue toxicity including the intestine, skin, and bone were investigated.

Materials and methods

In studies of the intestine, single-dose irradiation was performed with 12 Gy of Standard proton RT (S-PRT), followed by a second dose of 12 Gy of F-PRT or S-PRT. Additionally, a hypofractionation scheme was applied in the reirradiation setting (3 x 6.4 Gy of F-PRT or S-PRT, given every 48 hrs). In studies of skin/bone of the murine leg, 15 Gy of S-PRT was followed by hypofractionated reirradiation with F-PRT or S-PRT (3 x 11 Gy).

Results

Compared to reirradiation with S-PRT, F-PRT reduced intestinal fibrosis and collagen deposition in the reirradiation setting and significantly increased survival rate, demonstrating its protective effects on intestinal tissues. In previously irradiated leg tissues, reirradiation with hypofractionated F-PRT created transient dermatitis that fully resolved in contrast to reirradiation with hypofractionated S-PRT. Lymphedema was also alleviated after a second course of radiation with F-PRT, along with significant reductions in the accumulation of fibrous connective tissue in the skin compared to mice reirradiated with S-PRT. The delivery of a second course of fractionated S-PRT induced tibial fractures in 83.3% of the mice, whereas only 20% of mice reirradiated with F-PRT presented with fractures.

Conclusion

These studies provide the first evidence of the sparing effects of F-PRT, in the setting of hypofractionated reirradiation. The results support FLASH as highly relevant to the reirradiation regimen where it exhibits significant potential to minimize chronic complications for patients undergoing RT.

Treatment strategies for malignant pulmonary nodule: beyond lobectomy. Point-counterpoint

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Technological advancement in low-dose computed tomography resulted in an increased incidental discovery of early-stage lung cancer and multifocal ground glass opacity. The demand for parenchyma-preserving treatment strategies is greater now than ever. Pulmonary ablative therapy is a groundbreaking technique to offer local ablative treatment in a lung-sparing manner. It has become a promising technique in lung cancer management with its diverse applicability. In this article, we will review the current development of ablative therapy in lung and look into the future of this innovative technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current literature suggests that ablative therapy offers comparable local disease control to other local therapies and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), with a low risk of complications. In particular, bronchoscopic microwave ablation (BMWA) has considerably fewer pleural-based complications due to the avoidance of pleural puncture. BMWA can be considered in the multidisciplinary treatment pathway as it allows re-ablation and allows SBRT after BMWA.

SUMMARY

With the benefits which ablative therapy offers and its ability to incorporate into the multidisciplinary management pathway, we foresee ablative therapy, especially BMWA gaining significance in lung cancer treatment. Future directions on developing novel automated navigation platforms and the latest form of ablative energy would further enhance clinical outcomes for our patients.

Ultra-high dose-rate proton FLASH improves tumor control

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Proton radiotherapy (PRT) offers potential benefits over other radiation modalities, including photon and electron radiotherapy. Increasing the rate at which proton radiation is delivered may provide a therapeutic advantage. Here, we compared the efficacy of conventional proton therapy (CONVpr) to ultrahigh dose-rate proton therapy, FLASHpr, in a mouse model of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice bearing orthotopic lung tumors received thoracic radiation therapy using CONVpr (<0.05 Gy/s) and FLASHpr (>60 Gy/s) dose rates.

RESULTS

Compared to CONVpr, FLASHpr was more effective in reducing tumor burden and decreasing tumor cell proliferation. Furthermore, FLASHpr was more efficient in increasing the infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T-lymphocytes inside the tumor while simultaneously reducing the percentage of immunosuppressive regulatory T-cells (Tregs) among T-lymphocytes. Also, compared to CONVpr, FLASHpr was more effective in decreasing pro-tumorigenic M2-like macrophages in lung tumors, while increasing infiltration of anti-tumor M1-like macrophages. Finally, FLASHpr treatment reduced expression of checkpoint inhibitors in lung tumors, indicating reduced immune tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that FLASH dose-rate proton delivery modulates the immune system to improve tumor control and might thus be a promising new alternative to conventional dose rates for NSCLC treatment.

Effectiveness of Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Re-irradiation: A Review

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a possible treatment option for patients who develop recurrence within or at the edge of a previously irradiated volume. Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy is the result of technological advances in robotic precision, real-time imaging, non-invasive, highly customizable treatment plan, and delivery with sub-millimeter accuracy. This article reviews the radiobiologic, technical, and clinical aspects of robotic-based SABR re-irradiation for various anatomical sites. An extensive literature search was performed to identify articles on the utilization of robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for patients undergoing re-irradiation. The reported prescription dose and fractionation data along with outcomes such as overall survival, local control rates, and toxicities were qualitatively reviewed. The findings consistently indicate that re-irradiation using robotic SABR provides encouraging survival rates with minimal toxicity in the clinical setting of various anatomical sites delivered using locally non-invasive means where other treatment options are scarce.

Re-irradiation for intra-thoracic tumours and extra-thoracic breast cancer: dose accumulation, evaluation of efficacy and toxicity based on a literature review

The improvement seen in the diagnostic procedures and treatment of thoracic tumours means that patients have an increased chance of longer overall survival. Nevertheless, we can still find those who have had a recurrence or developed a secondary cancer in the previously treated area. These patients require retreatment including re-irradiation. We have reviewed the published data on thoracic re-irradiation, which shows that some specific healthy tissues can tolerate a significant dose of irradiation and these patients benefit from aggressive treatment; however, there is a risk of damage to normal tissue under these circumstances. We analysed the literature data on re-irradiation in the areas of vertebral bodies, spinal cord, breast, lung and oesophagus. We evaluated the doses of primary and secondary radiotherapy, the treatment techniques, as well as the local control and median or overall survival in patients treated with re-radiation. The longest OS is reported in the case of re-irradiation after second breast-conserving therapy where the 5-year OS range is 81 to 100% and is shorter in patients with loco-reginal re-irradiation where the 5-y OS range is 18 to 60%. 2-year OS in patients re-irradiated for lung cancer and oesophagus cancer range from 13 to 74% and 18 to 42%, respectively. Majority grade ≥3 toxicity after second breast-conserving therapy was fibrosis up to 35%. For loco-regional breast cancer recurrences, early toxicity occurred in up to 33% of patients resulting in mostly desquamation, while late toxicity was recorded in up to 23% of patients and were mostly ulcerations. Early grade ≥3 lung toxicity developed in up to 39% of patients and up to 20% of Grade 5 hemoptysis. The most frequently observed early toxicity grade ≥3 in oesophageal cancer was oesophagitis recorded in up to 57% of patients, followed by hematological complications which was recorded in up to 50% of patients. The most common late complications included dysphagia, recorded in up to 16.7% of patients. We have shown that thoracic re-irradiation is feasible and effective in achieving local control in some patients. Re-irradiation should be performed with maximum accuracy and care using the best available treatment methods with a highly conformal, image-guided approach. Due to tremendous technological progress in the field of radiotherapy, we can deliver radiation precisely, shorten the overall treatment time and potentially reduce treatment-related toxicities.

Optimal and actual rates of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) utilisation for primary lung cancer in Australia

•

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) plays a major role in the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

•

An evidence-based model is developed to estimate optimal rates of lung SABR utilisation within the Australian population.

•

Optimal utilisation rates are compared against actual utilisation rates to evaluate service provision.

Background and purpose

Radiotherapy utilisation rates considerably vary across different countries and service providers, highlighting the need to establish reliable benchmarks against which utilisation rates can be assessed. Here, optimal utilisation rates of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer are estimated and compared against actual utilisation rates to identify potential shortfalls in service provision.

Materials and Methods

An evidence-based optimal utilisation model was constructed after reviewing practice guidelines and identifying indications for lung SABR based on the best available evidence. The proportions of patients likely to develop each indication were obtained, whenever possible, from Australian population-based studies. Sensitivity analysis was performed to account for variations in epidemiological data. Practice pattern studies were reviewed to obtain actual utilisation rates.

Results

A total of 6% of all lung cancer patients were estimated to optimally require SABR at least once during the course of their illness (95% CI: 4–6%). Optimal utilisation rates were estimated to be 32% for stage I and 10% for stage II NSCLC. Actual utilisation rates for stage I NSCLC varied between 6 and 20%. For patients with inoperable stage I, 27–74% received SABR compared to the estimated optimal rate of 82%.

Conclusion

The estimated optimal SABR utilisation rates for lung cancer can serve as useful benchmarks to highlight gaps in service delivery and help plan for more adequate and efficient provision of care. The model can be easily modified to determine optimal utilisation rates in other populations or updated to reflect any changes in practice guidelines or epidemiological data.

Single-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy for primary and metastasic lung tumor: A new paradigm?

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective technique comparable to surgery in terms of local control and efficacy in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pulmonary metastasis. Several fractionation schemes have proven to be safe and effective, including the single fraction (SF) scheme. SF is an option cost-effectiveness, more convenience and comfortable for the patient and flexible in terms of its management combined with systemic treatments. The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has driven this not new but underutilized paradigm, recommending this option to minimize patients' visits to hospital. SF SABR already has a long experience, strong evidence and sufficient maturity to reliably evaluate outcomes in peripheral primary NSCLC and there are promising outcomes in pulmonary metastases, making it a valid treatment option; although its use in central locations, synchronous and recurrencies tumors requires more prospective safety and efficacy studies. The SABR radiobiology study, together with the combination with systemic therapies, (targeted therapies and immunotherapy) is a direction of research in both advanced disease and early stages whose future includes SF.

High Dose Thoracic Re-Irradiation and Chemo-Immunotherapy for Centrally Recurrent NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer dates back four decades, when the first small series on 29 patients receiving palliative doses was published. With 5-year overall survival rates of 57% in PDL-1 positive patients after primary chemo-radio-immunotherapy, the number of patients who experience loco-regional relapse will increase in the near future. In this context, centrally recurring lung tumors pose a major treatment challenge. Hence, the aim of the current review is to compile the available evidence on curatively intended thoracic re-irradiation for this special clinical situation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed. A study was included when the following criteria were met: (1) 66% of the patients had NSCLC, (2) a total dose of 50 Gy in the second course and/or a biologically effective dose of at least 100 Gy in both treatment courses was administered, (3) re-irradiation was administered with modern radiation techniques, (4) 50% or more of the patients had a centrally located relapse, (5) the minimum cohort size was 30 patients.

RESULTS

Of the initial 227 studies, 11 were analyzed, 1 of which was prospective. Median overall survival (OS) was 18.1 months (range 9.3-25.1), median progression free survival (PFS) was nine months (range 4.5-16), and median loco-regional control (LRC) was 12.1 months (range 6.5-20). Treatment-related mortality rates ranged from 2% to 14%. The total dose at re-irradiation correlated with both LRC (p-value = 0.012) and OS (p-value = 0.007) with a close relation between these two clinical endpoints (p-value = 0.006). The occurrence of acute toxicity grade 1 to 4 depended on the PTV size at re-irradiation (p-value = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

The evidence regarding curative re-irradiation for centrally recurrent NSCLC is primarily based on scarce retrospective data, which are characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity. The OS in this clinically challenging situation is expected to be around 1.5 years after re-treatment. Patients with a good performance score, younger age, small tumors, and a longer interval to recurrence potentially benefit most from re-irradiation. In this context, prospective trials are warranted to achieve substantial advances in the field.