Glucose-insulin-potassium therapy for acute myocardial infarction: what goes around comes around

Diabetes Mellitus in Acute Coronary Syndrome

The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has led to a pandemic, with significant microvascular and macrovascular complications including coronary artery disease (CAD), which worsen clinical outcomes and cardiovascular prognosis. Patients with both acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and DM have worse prognosis and several pathophysiologic mechanisms have been implicated including, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, endothelial dysfunction, platelet activation and aggregations as well as plaque characteristics and extent of coronary lesions. Therefore, regarding reperfusion strategies in the more complex anatomies coronary artery bypass surgery may be the preferred therapeutic strategy over percutaneous coronary intervention while both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia should be avoided with closed monitoring of glycemic status during the acute phase of myocardial infraction. However, the best treatment strategy remains undefined. Non-insulin therapies, due to the low risk of hypoglycemia concurrently with the multifactorial CV protective effects, may be proved to be the best treatment option in the future. Nevertheless, evidence for the beneficial effects of glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors and sodium glycose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, despite accumulating, is not robust and future randomized control trials may provide more definitive data.

Hyperglycemia in Acute Coronary Syndromes: From Mechanisms to Prognostic Implications

Numerous studies have documented that hyperglycemia is frequent in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes, affects patients with and without established diabetes, and is associated with adverse outcomes, with incremental increase in risk of mortality and complications observed across the spectrum of glucose elevations. This article reviews present knowledge about the association between glucose levels and outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes; describes available data regarding inpatient glucose management in this patient group, and comparative data across the spectrum of critically ill hospitalized patients; addresses some controversies in this field; and offers practical recommendations for patient management based on existing data.

High-dose glucose-insulin-potassium has hemodynamic benefits and can improve cardiac remodeling in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: From a randomized controlled study

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of high-dose glucose–insulin–potassium (GIK) solution on hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Patients and Methods:

We observed the changes in the hemodynamic parameters in 26 patients with AMI. All patients received primary PCI before entering the study. All patients in the study were randomized into the GIK group (n = 14) or the control group (n = 12). Patients in the GIK group received high-dose GIK solution (25% glucose, 80 mmol/L KCl and 50 IU/L insulin; 1.5 ml/kg/h) over 24 h. Patients in the control group received standard therapy. We monitored the hemodynamic parameters at baseline and after 6 h, 12 h, 18 h and 24 h, respectively. Then, we followed-up the cardiac function with echocardiography after 7 days, 1 month and 6 months.

Results:

The basic clinical data was similar between the groups. Primary PCI was performed successfully in 25 patients. The two groups were indistinguishable in all factors measured. GIK solution did not have a deleterious effect on the hemodynamic parameters. The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased during the first 12-h period and then decreased smoothly (F = 3.75, P = 0.02). The trends were similar between the two groups. The system vascular resistance index (SVRI) and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) decreased during the first 12 h in the GIK group but increased in the control group. The GIK solution significantly influenced SVRI (F = 4.71, P = 0.02). GIK solution improved the cardiac function measured by stroke volume (F = 4.11, P = 0.03) and cardiac index (F = 4.40, P = 0.02). In the 6-month follow-up, GIK improved cardiac remodeling (left ventricular diastolic diameter: 49.2 ± 2.89 vs. 53.9 ± 2.48, P < 0.001; left ventricular systolic diameter: 32.9 ± 2.24 vs. 35.9 ± 2.78, P < 0.01).

Conclusion:

High-dose GIK solution had no adverse effects on the hemodynamics in AMI patients treated with primary PCI. It can improve cardiac function by lowering SVRI. In the 6-month follow-up, it improved cardiac remodeling.

Effect of intravenous insulin therapy on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia commonly occurs in critically ill patients, even in the absence of diabetes mellitus, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates in such patients.

METHODS

Medline search using the terms intravenous insulin, intensive care, myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery and stroke.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous insulin therapy with or without adjunctive subcutaneous insulin therapy has been shown to improve morbidity and reduce mortality rates in surgical intensive care populations compared with subcutaneous insulin alone or oral hypoglycemic therapy. The evidence for such is less compelling in medical intensive care populations. Intravenous insulin therapy alone or in combination with glucose and potassium infusion appears to improve clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery patients, but there is conflicting evidence concerning its effect on morbidity and mortality rates after myocardial infarction. Insufficient evidence exists to determine the effect of intravenous insulin therapy on outcomes in other populations including stroke patients, those undergoing major noncardiac surgery, and burn patients. Intravenous insulin nomograms and nurse-driven protocols may improve blood glucose control, resulting in improved clinical outcomes.