Single high-dose erythropoietin administration immediately after reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the erythropoietin in myocardial infarction trial

Role of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Cardiovascular Protection in CKD Patients: Reappraisal of Their Impact and Mechanisms

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have markedly reduced the need for blood transfusion for renal anemia and are included in standard therapies for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Various protective effects of ESAs on the cardiovascular system have been discovered through basic research, and the effects have received much attention because the rates of cardiovascular events and mortality are high in CKD patients. However, randomized clinical trials did not provide strong evidence that ESAs exert cardioprotection in humans, including CKD patients. It is difficult to assess the cardioprotective effects of ESAs in CKD patients through the clinical data that has been reported to date because the relationship between hemoglobin level rather than ESA dose and cardiovascular event rates was examined in most studies. Interestingly, recent studies using a rat model of CKD showed that the infarct size-limiting effect of an ESA was lost when its dose was increased to a level that normalized blood hemoglobin levels, suggesting that the optimal dose of an ESA for myocardial protection is less than the dose required to normalize hemoglobin levels. Furthermore, animal models of traditional coronary risk factors or comorbidities were resistant to the cardioprotective effects of ESAs because of interruptions in signal-mediated mechanisms downstream of erythropoietin receptors. In this review, we briefly discuss basic and clinical data on the impact of anemia on coronary and systemic circulation, the effects of CKD on the cardiovascular system, and the multiple pharmacological actions of ESAs to examine whether the ESAs that are prescribed for renal anemia exert any cardioprotection in patients with CKD.

Growth factor for therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aim: This study was designed to systematically evaluate the effects of growth factor (GF) for therapeutic angiogenesis on ischemic heart disease (IHD) by pooling the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods and Results: PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to October 2022. RCTs, investigating the effects of GF therapy on IHD, were included. The risk bias of included study was assessed according to Cochrane tool. Weighted mean difference (WMD), calculated with fixed effect model or random effect model, was used to evaluate the effects of GF therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class. Relative risk (RR) was used to evaluate the effects of GF therapy on all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and revascularization. Meta-analysis, meta-regression analysis and publication bias analysis were performed by RevMan 5.3 or Stata 15.1 software. Twenty-nine studies involving 2899 IHD patients (1,577 patients in GF group and 1,322 patients in control group) were included. Compared with the control group, GF therapy did not reduce all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.54-1.24; p = 0.341), MACE [(RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.61-1.12; p = 0.227), revascularization (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.82-1.96, p = 0.290) and CCS angina class (WMD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.20, p = 0.560). However, GF therapy could increase LVEF during short-term follow-up (<1 year). Conclusion: GF for therapeutic angiogenesis was beneficial for increasing LVEF during short-term follow-up (<1 year), however, the therapy was not efficacious in decreasing all-cause mortality, MACE and revascularization.

Protective or Inhibitory Effect of Pharmacological Therapy on Cardiac Ischemic Preconditioning: A Literature Review

Ischemic preconditioning (IP) is an innate phenomenon, triggered by brief, non-lethal cycles of ischemia/reperfusion applied to a tissue or organ that confers tolerance to a subsequent more prolonged ischemic event. Once started, it can reduce the severity of myocardial ischemia associated with some clinical situations, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intermittent aortic clamping during coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Although the mechanisms underlying IP have not been completely elucidated, several studies have shown that this phenomenon involves the participation of cell triggers, intracellular signaling pathways, and end-effectors. Understanding this mechanism enables the development of preconditioning mimetic agents. It is known that a range of medications that activate the signaling cascades at different cellular levels can interfere with both the stimulation and the blockade of IP. Investigations of signaling pathways underlying ischemic conditioning have identified a number of therapeutic targets for pharmacological manipulation. This review aims to present and discuss the effects of several medications on myocardial IP.

A review of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury: Pathophysiology, experimental models, biomarkers, genetics and pharmacological treatment

Cardiovascular diseases are known to be the most fatal diseases worldwide. Ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is at the centre of the pathology of the most common cardiovascular diseases. According to the World Health Organization estimates, ischaemic heart disease is the leading global cause of death, causing more than 9 million deaths in 2016. After cardiovascular events, thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery are applied as treatment. However, after restoring coronary blood flow, myocardial I/R injury may occur. It is known that this damage occurs due to many pathophysiological mechanisms, especially increasing reactive oxygen types. Besides causing cardiomyocyte death through multiple mechanisms, it may be an important reason for affecting other cell types such as platelets, fibroblasts, endothelial and smooth muscle cells and immune cells. Also, polymorphonuclear leukocytes are associated with myocardial I/R damage during reperfusion. This damage may be insufficient in patients with co-morbidity, as it is demonstrated that it can be prevented by various endogenous antioxidant systems. In this context, the resulting data suggest that optimal cardioprotection may require a combination of additional or synergistic multi-target treatments. In this review, we discussed the pathophysiology, experimental models, biomarkers, treatment and its relationship with genetics in myocardial I/R injury. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY: This review summarized current information on myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury (pathophysiology, experimental models, biomarkers, genetics and pharmacological therapy) for researchers and reveals guiding data for researchers, especially in the field of cardiovascular system and pharmacology.

Microvascular Obstruction in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Looking Back to Move Forward. Focus on CMR

After a myocardial infarction (MI), despite the resolution of the coronary occlusion, the deterioration of myocardial perfusion persists in a considerable number of patients. This phenomenon is known as microvascular obstruction (MVO). Initially, the focus was placed on re-establishing blood flow in the epicardial artery. Then, the observation that MVO has profound negative structural and prognostic repercussions revived interest in microcirculation. In the near future, the availability of co-adjuvant therapies (beyond timely coronary reperfusion) aimed at preventing, minimizing, and repairing MVOs and finding convincing answers to questions regarding what, when, how, and where to administer these therapies will be of utmost importance. The objective of this work is to review the state-of-the-art concepts on pathophysiology, diagnostic methods, and structural and clinical implications of MVOs in patients with ST-segment elevation MIs. Based on this knowledge we discuss previously-tested and future opportunities for the prevention and repair of MVO.

The reporting of harms in publications on randomized controlled trials funded by the "Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique," a French academic funding scheme

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Accurate information on harms arising from medical interventions is essential for assessing benefit-risk ratios. Since 2004, there has been an extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for reporting harms data in publications on randomized clinical trials. The objective of our study was to assess the quality of this reporting from academic randomized clinical trials on drugs.

METHODS

We searched for articles on randomized clinical trials funded between 2004 and 2008 by the "Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique." We included all published randomized clinical trials that assessed drugs. Harm-related data were extracted and compared with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Harms extension, and the space in the articles devoted to harms data was measured.

RESULTS

In total, 37 randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. The median harm score was 9/18. In 73.0% of the randomized clinical trials, the reporting of adverse events was selective. Less than 50% of articles provided information on reasons for drug discontinuation that were related to adverse events. The score and the space allocated to harms were higher in antineoplastic and immunomodulating drugs randomized clinical trials, while the median proportion of the space in the results section allocated to harms was 16.8%. In 67.6% of the articles, the space allocated to the authors' list and affiliations was greater than the space in the results section allocated to descriptions of harms. No significant improvement in the score or the space allocation was observed during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Reporting of harms in French academic drug randomized clinical trials is suboptimal; moreover, this shortcoming is a critical barrier to evaluating the benefit-risk ratio of drug randomized clinical trials. Thus, the authors should be encouraged to adhere to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Harms extension.

Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a common problem experienced by critically-ill people. Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been used as a pharmacologic strategy when the blunted response of endogenous erythropoietin has been reported in critically-ill people. The use of ESAs becomes more important where adverse clinical outcomes of transfusing blood products is a limitation. However, this indication for ESAs is not licensed by regulatory authorities and is called off-label use. Recent studies concern the harm of ESAs in a critical care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To focus on harms in assessing the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), alone or in combination, compared with placebo, no treatment or a different active treatment regimen when administered off-label to critically-ill people.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO via OvidSP, CINAHL, all evidence-based medicine (EBM) reviews including IPA and SCI-Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, BIOSIS Previews and TOXLINE up to February 2017. We also searched trials registries, checked reference lists of relevant studies and tracked their citations by using SciVerse Scopus.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies, which compared scheduled systemic administration of ESAs versus other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically-ill people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened and evaluated the eligibility of retrieved records, extracted data and assessed the risks of bias and quality of the included studies. We resolved differences in opinion by consensus or by involving a third review author. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. We used fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity between studies. We fitted three-level hierarchical Bayesian models to calculate overall treatment effect estimates.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 27,865 records identified, 39 clinical trials and 14 observational studies, including a total of 945,240 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Five studies are awaiting classification. Overall, we found 114 adverse events in 33 studies (30 RCTs and three observational studies), and mortality was reported in 41 studies (32 RCTs and nine observational studies). Most studies were at low to moderate risk of bias for harms outcomes. However, overall harm assessment and reporting were of moderate to low quality in the RCTs, and of low quality in the observational studies. We downgraded the GRADE quality of evidence for venous thromboembolism and mortality to very low and low, respectively, because of risk of bias, high inconsistency, imprecision and limitations of study design.It is unclear whether there is an increase in the risk of any adverse events (Bayesian risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.21; 3099 participants; 9 studies; low-quality evidence) or venous thromboembolism (Bayesian RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.41; 18,917 participants; 18 studies; very low-quality evidence).There was a decreased risk of mortality with off-label use of ESAs in critically-ill people (Bayesian RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; 930,470 participants; 34 studies; low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low quality of evidence suggests that off-label use of ESAs may reduce mortality in a critical care setting. There was a lack of high-quality evidence about the harm of ESAs in critically-ill people. The information for biosimilar ESAs is less conclusive. Most studies neither evaluated ESAs' harm as a primary outcome nor predefined adverse events. Any further studies of ESA should address the quality of evaluating, recording and reporting of adverse events.

Translational cardiac stem cell therapy: advancing from first-generation to next-generation cell types

Acute myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure rank among the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Except for heart transplantation, current therapy options only treat the symptoms but do not cure the disease. Stem cell-based therapies represent a possible paradigm shift for cardiac repair. However, most of the first-generation approaches displayed heterogeneous clinical outcomes regarding efficacy. Stemming from the desire to closely match the target organ, second-generation cell types were introduced and rapidly moved from bench to bedside. Unfortunately, debates remain around the benefit of stem cell therapy, optimal trial design parameters, and the ideal cell type. Aiming at highlighting controversies, this article provides a critical overview of the translation of first-generation and second-generation cell types. It further emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanisms of cardiac repair and the lessons learned from first-generation trials, in order to improve cell-based therapies and to potentially finally implement cell-free therapies.

Optimizing the host substrate environment for cardiac angiogenesis, arteriogenesis, and myogenesis

INTRODUCTION

The diseased host milieu, such as endothelial dysfunction (ED), decreased NO bioavailability, and ischemic/inflammatory post-MI environment, hamper the clinical success of existing cardiac regenerative therapies. Area covered: In this article, current strategies including pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches for improving the diseased host milieu are reviewed. Specifically, the authors provide focus on: i) the mechanism of ED in patients with cardiovascular diseases, ii) the current results of ED improving strategies in pre-clinical and clinical studies, and iii) the use of biomaterials as a novel modulator in damaged post-MI environment. Expert opinion: Adjunct therapies which improve host endothelial function have demonstrated promising outcomes, potentially overcoming disappointing results of cell therapy in human studies. In the future, elucidation of the interactions between the host tissue and therapeutic agents, as well as downstream signaling pathways, will be the next challenges in enhancing regenerative therapy. More careful investigations are also required to establish these agents' safety and efficacy for wide usage in humans.

Baseline Hemoglobin Levels Associated with One-Year Mortality in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

BACKGROUND

The association between hemoglobin (Hb) levels and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the mortality among STEMI patients with anemia or erythrocytosis, and further establish the relationship between mortality and the increment of Hb level.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2012, 951 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a medical center in Northern Taiwan were enrolled in our study, including 535 patients with normal Hb level, 148 with anemia (male Hb ≤ 13 g/dl, female ≤ 12) and 268 with erythrocytosis (male Hb ≥ 16, female ≥ 15).

RESULTS

Patients in the anemia group were the oldest, and had higher morbidity than the normal Hb group, followed by the erythrocytosis group. In regression analyses, neither anemia nor erythrocytosis was associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality. Each 1-g/dl increment of Hb level was not associated with 30-day mortality both in patients with anemia or erythrocytosis. However, it was associated with a decreased risk of 1-year mortality in anemic patients [hazard ratio (HR): 0.756, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.608-0.938, p = 0.011] and an increased risk of 1-year mortality in those with erythrocytosis (HR: 2.086, 95%CI: 1.106-3.937, p = 0.023). In multivariate analysis, each 1-g/dl increment of Hb level was associated with 1-year mortality both in anemic patients and those with erythrocytosis (HR: 0.788, 95%CI: 0.621-0.999, p = 0.049; HR: 2.302, 95%CI: 1.051-5.04, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher hemoglobin levels in STEMI patients with anemia were associated with decreased risks of 1-year mortality, whereas higher hemoglobin levels in those with erythrocytosis were associated with increased risks of one-year mortality.

rhErythropoietin-b as a tissue protective agent in kidney transplantation: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Extended criteria donor (ECD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are at increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Experimental evidence suggests that erythropoietin (EPO) attenuates renal damage in acute kidney injury. This study piloted the administration of high dose recombinant human EPO-beta at implantation of ECD and DCD kidneys, and evaluated biomarkers of kidney injury post-transplant.

METHODS

Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either rhEPO-b (100,000 iu) (n = 19 in the intervention group, as 1 patient was un-transplantable post randomisation), or placebo (n = 20) in this, double blind, placebo-controlled trial at Manchester Royal Infirmary from August 2007 to June 2009. Participants received either an ECD (n = 17) or DCD (n = 22) kidney. Adverse events, renal function, haematopoietic markers, and rejections were recorded out to 90 days post-transplant. Biomarkers of kidney injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, Kidney Injury Molecule-1 and IL-18) were measured in blood and urine during the first post-operative week.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGF (53% vs 55%) (RR = 1.0; CI = 0.5-1.6; p = 0.93) and slow graft function (SGF) (32% vs 25%) (RR = 1.1; CI = 0.5-1.9; p = 0.73) respectively, serum creatinine, eGFR, haemoglobin and haematocrit, blood pressure, and acute rejection were similar in the 2 study arms. High dose rhEPO-b had little effect on the temporal profiles of the biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose rhEPO-b appears to be safe and well tolerated in the early post- transplant period in this study, but has little effect on delayed or slow graft function in recipients of kidneys from DCD and ECD donors. Comparing the profiles of biomarkers of kidney injury (NGAL, IL-18 and KIM-1) showed little difference between the rhEPO-b treated and placebo groups. A meta-analysis of five trials yielded an overall estimate of the RR for DGF of 0.89 (CI = 0.73; 1.07), a modest effect favouring EPO but not a significant difference. A definitive trial based on this estimate would require 1000-2500 patients per arm for populations with base DGF rates of 50-30% and 90% power. Such a trial is clearly unfeasible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT Number 2006-005373-22 ISRCTN ISRCTN85447324 registered 19/08/09.

Administration of erythropoietin in patients with myocardial infarction: does it make sense? An updated and comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine protective effects of erythropoietin on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Medline, Embase, Elsevier and Sciences online database as well as Google scholar literature were used for selecting appropriate studies with randomized controlled design. The effect sizes measured were odds ratio (OR) for categorical variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of duration of hospitalization in intervention and control groups. Values of P<0.1 for Q test or I(2)>50% indicated significant heterogeneity between the studies. The literature searches of all major databases retrieved 973 studies. After screening, a total of 15 trials that reported outcomes were identified. Pooled analysis was performed on left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD of -0.047; 95% CI: -0.912 to 0.819; P=0.9), left ventricular end diastolic volume (WMD of -0.363; 95% CI: -3.902 to 3.175; P=0.8), left ventricular end systolic volume (WMD of 0.346; 95% CI: -2.533 to 3.226; P=0.8), infarct size (WMD of -0.446; 95% CI: -2.352 to -1.460; P=0.6), stroke (OR of 2.1; 95% CI: 0.58 to 7.54; P=0.2), re-myocardial infarction (OR of 1.06; 95% CI: 0.52 to 2.185; P=0.8), heart failure (OR of 0.53; 95% CI: 0.259 to 1.105; P=0.09), mortality (OR of 0.56; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.19; P=0.13), thrombosis (OR of 0.774; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.45; P=0.4), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR of 0.926; 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.35; P=0.6). Short-term administration of EPO in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing PCI does not result in improvement in cardiac function, reduction of infarct size and all-cause mortality. Low dose EPO therapy may not be the choice of treatment for the patients with MI, while higher doses might be more effective.

High-dose erythropoietin for tissue protection

BACKGROUND

The discovery of potential anti-apoptotic and cytoprotective effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has led to clinical trials investigating the use of high-dose, short-term rHuEPO therapy for tissue protection in conditions such as stroke and myocardial infarction. Experimental studies have been favourable, but the clinical efficacy has yet to be validated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have reviewed clinical studies regarding the use of high-dose, short-term rHuEPO therapy for tissue protection in humans with the purpose to detail the safety and efficacy of rHuEPO for this indication. A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE database for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

RESULTS

Twenty-six randomized controlled trials that enrolled 3176 patients were included. The majority of trials (20 trials including 2724 patients) reported no effect of rHuEPO therapy on measures of tissue protection. Five trials including 1025 patients reported safety concerns in the form of increased mortality or adverse event rates. No studies reported reduced mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is sparse to support a tissue-protective benefit of rHuEPO in humans. Moreover, a number of studies indicate that short-term administration of high-dose rHuEPO is associated with an increased risk of mortality and serious adverse events. Further work is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of toxicity of rHuEPO in humans.

Erythropoietin and organ protection: lessons from negative clinical trials

Based on its pleiotropic effects, erythropoietin can decrease inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Erythropoietin provides organ protection for the heart, brain, and kidney in diverse preclinical animal studies, especially models that include ischemia–reperfusion injury and/or inflammation. However, large clinical studies in coronary reperfusion, heart failure, stroke, acute kidney injury, and chronic renal disease have failed to demonstrate improved outcomes. A study in a previous issue of Critical Care examining the ability of erythropoietin to prevent or ameliorate acute kidney injury in patients undergoing complex valvular heart surgery is similarly negative. The failure of erythropoietin in clinical studies may be due to an inadequate dose, since the receptors responsible for organ protection may require higher concentrations than those responsible for erythropoiesis. However, as has occurred in studies in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome, the negative studies probably reflect an inadequate understanding of the complexity of the underlying processes with multiple redundant and interacting pathways that may differ among the large number of different cell types involved. As tools to understand this complexity and integrate it on an organismal basis continue to evolve, we will develop the ability to use erythropoietin and related nonhematopoietic agents for organ protection.

Safety and clinical outcome of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been investigated in small studies in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents did not show a clear effect on left ventricular function or clinical outcome, but some studies suggested an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE was performed, until December 2012. We included randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of ESAs in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, with ≥30 days of follow-up. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis after PCI. Secondary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Individual patient data were obtained from 10 of 11 trials, including 97.3% (1,242/1,277) of all patients randomized to control (n = 600) or to ESAs (n = 642). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the treatment allocations. Mean follow-up time was 248 (±131) days. The primary end point occurred in 3.5% (20/577) in the control group and in 2.1% (13/610) in the ESA group (hazard ratio for ESAs, 0.63; 95% CI [0.31-1.27]; P = .20). Mortality occurred in 13 (2.3%) in the control group and 5 (0.8%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio for ESAs, 0.38; 95% CI [0.13-1.06]; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration does not result in an increased risk of adverse cardiac events in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Results of ongoing studies may provide further insight to the potential beneficial clinical effects of ESAs in STEMI patients.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Reducing Myocardial Infarct Size in Clinical Trials

In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, early, successful, and durable reperfusion therapy optimizes the likelihood of favorable outcomes. Fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention improve survival compared to no reperfusion therapy in large part by reducing infarct size (IS) and preserving left ventricular ejection fraction. There is direct correlation between IS and clinical outcomes. In this article, we will review some of the more promising pharmacological agents geared toward reduction in IS, discuss the major pathways that can lead to this desirable outcome, and evaluate the results of clinical trials performed with these and other compounds.

Erythropoietin in cardiac disease: effective or harmful?

Discovered as the primary regulator of erythropoiesis, erythropoietin (EPO) is involved in a broad variety of processes that play a major role in cardiovascular diseases. In particular, the antiapoptotic and pro-angiogenic properties of EPO have prompted a growing interest in the use of EPO for the treatment of myocardial infarction and heart failure. In a variety of myocardial ischemic injury animal models, EPO administration has been shown to acutely reduce infarct size, thereby preserving ventricular function. In addition, cardiac long-term effects of EPO, such as prevention of ventricular remodeling and heart failure, have been described. In recent years, several trials have tested the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) administration in patients with myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure, in the attempt to translate the cardioprotection found in experimental models to human patients. In view of the generally controversial findings, in this updated review we provide an overview of the results of the most recent trials that investigated the role of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), including rhEPO and its analogue darbepoetin, in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. The problems related to safety and tolerability of ESA therapy are also discussed. Our analysis of the available literature demonstrates that the results of clinical studies in patients with cardiac disease are not uniform and the conclusions are contradictory. Further larger prospective studies are required to test clinical efficacy and safety of EPO.

Erythropoietin action in stress response, tissue maintenance and metabolism

Erythropoietin (EPO) regulation of red blood cell production and its induction at reduced oxygen tension provides for the important erythropoietic response to ischemic stress. The cloning and production of recombinant human EPO has led to its clinical use in patients with anemia for two and half decades and has facilitated studies of EPO action. Reports of animal and cell models of ischemic stress in vitro and injury suggest potential EPO benefit beyond red blood cell production including vascular endothelial response to increase nitric oxide production, which facilitates oxygen delivery to brain, heart and other non-hematopoietic tissues. This review discusses these and other reports of EPO action beyond red blood cell production, including EPO response affecting metabolism and obesity in animal models. Observations of EPO activity in cell and animal model systems, including mice with tissue specific deletion of EPO receptor (EpoR), suggest the potential for EPO response in metabolism and disease.

Long term effects of epoetin alfa in patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction

PURPOSE

The HEBE III trial showed that epoetin alfa administration in patients with a first ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) did not improve left ventricular function at 6 weeks after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The long term effects of erythropoiesis- stimulating agents on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are unknown, therefore we evaluated clinical events at 1 year after PCI.

METHODS

A total of 529 patients with a first STEMI and successful primary PCI were randomized to standard optimal medical treatment (N = 266) or an additional bolus of 60,000 IU epoetin alfa administered intravenously (N = 263) within 3 h after PCI. Analyses were performed by intention to treat.

RESULTS

At 1 year after STEMI, 485 patients had complete follow-up. The rate of the composite end point of all-cause mortality, re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke and/or heart failure was 6.4 % (N = 15) in the epoetin alfa group and 9.6 % (N = 24) in the control group (p = 0.18). Thromboembolic events were present in 1.3 % (N = 3) of patients in the epoetin alfa group and 2.4 % (N = 6) in the control group. There was no evidence of benefit from epoetin alfa administration in subgroups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of a single bolus of epoetin alfa in patients with STEMI does not result in a reduction of cardiovascular events at 1 year after primary PCI. There was a comparable incidence of thromboembolic complications in both treatment groups, suggesting that epoetin alfa administration is safe at long term.

Neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin pretreatment in a rodent model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion

OBJECT.: There is an unmet clinical need to develop neuroprotective agents for neurosurgical and endovascular procedures that require transient cerebral artery occlusion. The aim in this study was to explore the effects of a single dose of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) before middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion in a focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion model.

METHODS

Twenty-eight adult male Wistar rats were subjected to right MCA occlusion via the intraluminal thread technique for 60 minutes under continuous cortical perfusion monitoring by laser Doppler flowmetry. Rats were divided into 2 groups: control and treatment. In the treated group, rhEPO (1000 IU/kg intravenously) was administered 10 minutes before the onset of the MCA ischemia. At 24-hour reperfusion, animals were examined for neurological deficits, blood samples were collected, and animals were killed. The following parameters were evaluated: brain infarct volume, ipsilateral hemispheric edema, neuron-specific enolase plasma levels, parenchyma histological features (H & E staining), Fluoro-Jade-positive neurons, p-Akt and total Akt expression by Western blot analysis, and p-Akt-positive nuclei by immunohistochemical investigation.

RESULTS

Infarct volume and Fluoro-Jade staining of degenerating neurons in the infarct area did not vary between groups. The severity of neurological deficit (p < 0.001), amount of brain edema (78% reduction in treatment group, p < 0.001), and neuron-specific enolase plasma levels (p < 0.001) were reduced in the treatment group. Perivascular edema was histologically less marked in the treatment group. No variations in the expression or localization of p-Akt were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of rhEPO before the onset of 60-minute transient MCA ischemia protected the brain from this insult. It is unlikely that rhEPO pretreatment leads to direct neuronal antiapoptotic effects, as supported by the lack of Akt activation, and its benefits are most probably related to an indirect effect on brain edema as a consequence of blood-brain barrier preservation. Although research on EPO derivatives is increasing, rhEPO acts through distinct neuroprotective pathways and its clinical safety profile is well known. Clinically available rhEPO is a potential therapy for prevention of neuronal injury induced by transitory artery occlusion during neurovascular procedures.

Cardioprotection and pharmacological therapies in acute myocardial infarction: Challenges in the current era

In patients with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, timely myocardial reperfusion using primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the most effective therapy for limiting myocardial infarct size, preserving left-ventricular systolic function and reducing the onset of heart failure. Within minutes after the restoration of blood flow, however, reperfusion itself results in additional damage, also known as myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. An improved understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying reperfusion injury has resulted in the identification of several promising pharmacological (cyclosporin-A, exenatide, glucose-insulin-potassium, atrial natriuretic peptide, adenosine, abciximab, erythropoietin, metoprolol and melatonin) therapeutic strategies for reducing the severity of myocardial reperfusion injury. Many of these agents have shown promise in initial proof-of-principle clinical studies. In this article, we review the pathophysiology underlying myocardial reperfusion injury and highlight the potential pharmacological interventions which could be used in the future to prevent reperfusion injury and improve clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease.

Current state of clinical translation of cardioprotective agents for acute myocardial infarction

There is continued interest in the concept of limiting myocardial infarct size with adjunctive agents administered along with reperfusion injury; however, there remains considerable controversy in the literature. The purpose of this article is to review the medical literature on clinical trials performed during the past 3 years that have attempted to reduce myocardial infarct size by administration of adjunctive therapies along with reperfusion therapy. A PubMed-driven literature search revealed a host of clinical trials focusing on the following prominent types of therapies: endogenous conditioning (postconditioning and remote ischemic conditioning); rapid cooling; pharmacological therapy (cyclosporine, abciximab, clopidogrel, tirofiban, erythropoietin, thrombus aspiration, adenosine, glucose-insulin-potassium, statins, antidiabetic agents, FX06, iron chelation, and ranolazine). Although there remains some controversy, quite a few of these studies showed that adjunctive therapy further reduced myocardial infarct size when coupled with reperfusion. Antiplatelet agents are emerging as some of the newest agents that seem to have cardioprotective capabilities. Postconditioning has become a bit more controversial in the clinical literature; remote conditioning, early and rapid cooling, adenosine, and ranolazine are intriguing therapies deserving of larger studies. Certain agents and maneuvers, such as erythropoietin, protein kinase C δ inhibitors, iron chelation, and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, perhaps should be retired. The correct adjunctive therapy administered along with reperfusion has the capability of further reducing myocardial injury during ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.

Erythropoietin and the heart: physiological effects and the therapeutic perspective

Erythropoietin (Epo) has been thought to act exclusively on erythroid progenitor cells. The identification of Epo receptor (EpoR) in non-haematopoietic cells and tissues including neurons, astrocytes, microglia, immune cells, cancer cell lines, endothelial cells, bone marrow stromal cells, as well as cells of myocardium, reproductive system, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, pancreas and skeletal muscle indicates that Epo has pleiotropic actions. Epo shows signals through protein kinases, anti-apoptotic proteins and transcription factors. In light of interest of administering recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEpo) and its analogues for limiting infarct size and left ventricular (LV) remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in humans, the foremost studies utilising rhEpo are reviewed. The putative mechanisms involved in Epo-induced cardioprotection are related to the antiapoptotic, anti-inflammatory and angiogenic effects of Epo. Thus, cardioprotective potentials of rhEpo are reviewed in this article by focusing on clinical applicability. An overview of non-haematopoietic Epo analogues, which are a reliable alternative to the classic EpoR agonists and may prevent undesired side effects, is also provided.

High-dose erythropoietin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

We sought to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the potential influence of high-dose erythropoietin (EPO) on cardiac function parameters in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

By searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to December 2012), seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting cardiac functional parameters with a total of 1,250 acute STEMI patients were identified. When applied to patients with acute STEMI, high-dose EPO was relatively safe and no increase in all-caused death and severe adverse effects were indicated. Estimates were pooled from fixed or random effects models. Compared with controls, high-dose EPO resulted in a slight but significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction of 1.02 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.17-1.88, P = 0.019, I (2) = 0 %] and an improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume of -4.61 ml (95 % CI -7.64 to -1.58, P = 0.003, I (2) = 27.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggested that high-dose EPO has limited cardio-protective effects in patients with STEMI. However, considering the relatively short follow-up durations and small patient populations in the current RCTs, the effects of high-dose EPO on clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI need to be evaluated in larger prospective RCTs of longer duration.

Pharmacologic therapy that simulates conditioning for cardiac ischemic/reperfusion injury

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of deaths due to noncommunicable diseases, of which ischemic heart disease forms a large percentage. The main therapeutic strategy to treat ischemic heart disease is reperfusion that could either be medical or surgical. However, reperfusion following ischemia is known to increase the infarct size further. Newer strategies such as ischemic preconditioning (IPC), ischemic postconditioning, and remote IPC have been shown to condition the myocardium to ischemia-reperfusion injury and thus reduce the final infarct size. Research over the past 3 decades has deepened our understanding of cellular and subcellular pathways that mediate ischemia-reperfusion injury. This in turn has resulted in the development of several pharmacological agents that act as conditioning agents, which reduce the final myocardial infarct size following ischemia-reperfusion. This review discusses many of these agents, their mechanisms of action, and the animal and clinical evidence behind them.

Safety of off-label erythropoiesis stimulating agents in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are used to treat anemia in critically ill patients. This indication is off-label, because it is not licensed by regulatory authorities. Recently ESAs were suspected to harm critically ill patients. Our objective was to assess the safety of ESAs in off-label indications in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Eleven databases were searched up to April 2012. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies in any language that compared off-label ESAs treatment with other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically ill patients. Two authors independently screened and evaluated retrieved records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of reporting.

RESULTS

We used frequentist and Bayesian models to combine studies, and performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses. From 12,888 citations, we included 48 studies (34 RCTs; 14 observational), involving 944,856 participants. Harm reporting was of medium to low quality. There was no statistically significant increased risk of adverse events in general, serious adverse events, the most frequently reported adverse events, and death in critically ill patients treated with ESAs. These results were robust against risk of bias and analysis methods. There is evidence that ESAs increase the risk of clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events, and there is some less certain evidence that ESAs might increase the risk for venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, administration of ESAs is associated with a significant increase in clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events but not with other frequently reported adverse events and death.

Use of high-dose erythropoietin for repair after injury: A comparison of outcomes in heart and kidney

CONTEXT

There is a need to define the exact benefits and contraindications of use of high-dose recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) for its non-hematopoietic function as a cytokine that enhances tissue repair after injury. This review compares the outcomes from use of EPO in the injured heart and kidney, two organs that are thought, traditionally, to have intrinsically-different repair mechanisms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITIONS

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Google Scholar, Pubmed (NLM), LISTA (EBSCO) and Web of Science have been searched.

RESULTS

Ongoing work by us on EPO protection of ischemia-reperfusion-injured kidneys indicated, first, that EPO acutely enhanced kidney repair via anti-apoptotic, pro-regenerative mechanisms, and second, that EPO may promote chronic fibrosis in the long term. Work by others on the ischaemia-injured heart has also indicated that EPO promotes repair. Although myocardial infarcts are made up mostly of necrotic tissue, many publications state EPO is anti-apoptotic in the heart, as well as promoting healing via cell differentiation and stimulation of granulation tissue. In the case of the heart, promotion of fibrosis may be advantageous where an infarct has destroyed a zone of cardiomyocytes, but if EPO stimulates progressive fibrosis in the heart, this may promote cardiac failure.

CONCLUSIONS

A major concern in relation to the use of EPO in a cytoprotective role is its stimulation of long-term inflammation and fibrosis. EPO usage for cytoprotection is undoubtedly advantageous, but it may need to be offset with an anti-inflammatory agent in some organs, like kidney and heart, where progression to chronic fibrosis after acute injury is often recorded.

Human erythropoietin gene delivery for cardiac remodeling of myocardial infarction in rats

Considerable efforts have been made to exploit cardioprotective drugs and gene delivery systems for myocardial infarction (MI). The promising cardioprotective effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) protein in animal experiments have not been consistently reproduced in clinical human trials of acute MI; however, the mechanisms underlying the inconsistent discrepancies are not yet fully understood. We hypothesized that the plasmid human erythropoietin gene (phEPO) delivered by our bioreducible polymer might produce cardioprotective effects on post-infarct cardiac remodeling. We demonstrated that intramyocardial delivery of phEPO by an arginine-grafted poly(disulfide amine) (ABP) polymer in infarcted rats preserves cardiac geometry and systolic function. The reduced infarct size of phEPO/ABP delivery was followed by decrease in fibrosis, protection from cardiomyocyte loss, and down-regulation of apoptotic activity. In addition, the increased angiogenesis and decreased myofibroblast density in the border zone of the infarct support the beneficial effects of phEPO/ABP administration. Furthermore, phEPO/ABP delivery induced prominent suppression on Ang II and TGF-β activity in all subdivisions of cardiac tissues except for the central zone of infarct. These results of phEPO gene therapy delivered by a bioreducible ABP polymer provide insight into the lack of phEPO gene therapy translation in the treatment of acute MI to human trials.

Erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) agonism is used to treat a wide range of disease

The erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) was discovered and described in red blood cells (RBCs), stimulating its proliferation and survival. The target in humans for EpoR agonists drugs appears clear-to treat anemia. However, there is evidence of the pleitropic actions of erythropoietin (Epo). For that reason, rhEpo therapy was suggested as a reliable approach for treating a broad range of pathologies, including heart and cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease), spinal cord injury, stroke, diabetic retinopathy and rare diseases (Friedreich ataxia). Unfortunately, the side effects of rhEpo are also evident. A new generation of nonhematopoietic EpoR agonists drugs (asialoEpo, Cepo and ARA 290) have been investigated and further developed. These EpoR agonists, without the erythropoietic activity of Epo, while preserving its tissue-protective properties, will provide better outcomes in ongoing clinical trials. Nonhematopoietic EpoR agonists represent safer and more effective surrogates for the treatment of several diseases such as brain and peripheral nerve injury, diabetic complications, renal ischemia, rare diseases, myocardial infarction, chronic heart disease and others.

The mitochondria-targeted antioxidants and remote kidney preconditioning ameliorate brain damage through kidney-to-brain cross-talk

Background

Many ischemia-induced neurological pathologies including stroke are associated with high oxidative stress. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants could rescue the ischemic organ by providing specific delivery of antioxidant molecules to the mitochondrion, which potentially suffers from oxidative stress more than non-mitochondrial cellular compartments. Besides direct antioxidative activity, these compounds are believed to activate numerous protective pathways. Endogenous anti-ischemic defense may involve the very powerful neuroprotective agent erythropoietin, which is mainly produced by the kidney in a redox-dependent manner, indicating an important role of the kidney in regulation of brain ischemic damage. The goal of this study is to track the relations between the kidney and the brain in terms of the amplification of defense mechanisms during SkQR1 treatment and remote renal preconditioning and provide evidence that the kidney can generate signals inducing a tolerance to oxidative stress-associated brain pathologies.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We used the cationic plastoquinone derivative, SkQR1, as a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant to alleviate the deleterious consequences of stroke. A single injection of SkQR1 before cerebral ischemia in a dose-dependent manner reduces infarction and improves functional recovery. Concomitantly, an increase in the levels of erythropoietin in urine and phosphorylated glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) in the brain was detected 24 h after SkQR1 injection. However, protective effects of SkQR1 were not observed in rats with bilateral nephrectomy and in those treated with the nephrotoxic antibiotic gentamicin, indicating the protective role of humoral factor(s) which are released from functional kidneys. Renal preconditioning also induced brain protection in rats accompanied by an increased erythropoietin level in urine and kidney tissue and P-GSK-3β in brain. Co-cultivation of SkQR1-treated kidney cells with cortical neurons resulted in enchanced phosphorylation of GSK-3β in neuronal cells.

Conclusion

The results indicate that renal preconditioning and SkQR1-induced brain protection may be mediated through the release of EPO from the kidney.

Erythropoietin treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

In experimental models of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), erythropoietin (EPO) reduces infarct size and improves left ventricular (LV) function. However, in the clinical setting, the effect of EPO in AMI was unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EPO to explore the safety and therapeutic effects of EPO in patients with AMI.

METHODS

We identified reports of RCTs comparing EPO to placebo for AMI in adult humans in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, cardiac function by LV ejection fraction and infarct size.

RESULTS

We included 13 articles of RCTs with data for 1,564 patients. Erythropoietin therapy did not improve LV ejection fraction (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.33, 95% CI -1.90 to 1.24, P = .68) and had no effect on infarct size, as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (WMD -0.12, -2.16 to 1.91, P = .90) or serum peak value of creatine kinase-MB (WMD -2.01, -25.70 to 21.68, P = .87). Erythropoietin treatment did not decrease the risk of total adverse cardiac events (relative risk [RR] 1.02, 0.65-1.61, P = .92). Erythropoietin treatment also failed to decrease the risk of heart failure (RR, 0.69, 0.27-1.72, P = .42) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.55, 0.22-1.33, P = .18). Moreover, EPO had no effect on the risk of stent thrombosis (RR, 0.69, 0.29-1.64, P = .40).

CONCLUSION

Erythropoietin in patients with AMI seems to have no clinical benefit for heart function or reducing infarct size, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Erythropoietin may not be a choice for patients with AMI.

CMR of microvascular obstruction and hemorrhage in myocardial infarction

Microvascular obstruction (MO) or no-reflow phenomenon is an established complication of coronary reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. It is increasingly recognized as a poor prognostic indicator and marker of subsequent adverse LV remodeling. Although MO can be assessed using various imaging modalities including electrocardiography, myocardial contrast echocardiography, nuclear scintigraphy, and coronary angiography, evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is particularly useful in enhancing its detection, diagnosis, and quantification, as well as following its subsequent effects on infarct evolution and healing. MO assessment has become a routine component of the CMR evaluation of acute myocardial infarction and will increasingly play a role in clinical trials of adjunctive reperfusion agents and strategies. This review will summarize the pathophysiology of MO, current CMR approaches to diagnosis, clinical implications, and future directions needed for improving our understanding of this common clinical problem.