Effect of QRS morphology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Impact of polypharmacy on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background

The prevalence rates of heart failure (HF) and hyperpolypharmacy have increased with the aging population. While a negative impact of hyperpolypharmacy on HF clinical outcomes has already been reported, the effects of hyperpolypharmacy on patients with advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated data from 147 patients with advanced HFrEF who underwent CRT between March 2004 and June 2020. Patients were divided into nonpolypharmacy (<5 medications) and polypharmacy (≥5 medications) groups, as well as nonhyperpolypharmacy (<10 medications) and hyperpolypharmacy (≥10 medications) groups.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 70.6 ± 9.7 years, and 90 patients (67.2%) were male. The median number of medications used was 10 (interquartile range: 7-13, range: 2-24); Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the hyperpolypharmacy group had a significantly worse long-term survival rate in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; p = 0.004) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.005). Long-term survival in terms of MACE and all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the polypharmacy with cardiovascular medication and nonpolypharmacy with cardiovascular medication groups. By contrast, the polypharmacy with noncardiovascular medication group had a significantly worse long-term survival rate in terms of MACE (p = 0.006) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.003) than the nonpolypharmacy with noncardiovascular medication group.

Conclusions

Hyperpolypharmacy was significantly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced HFrEF who underwent CRT. Noncardiovascular polypharmacy may underlie the harmful effects of hyperpolypharmacy.

Optimizing outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy: what do recent data and insights say?

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF) in approximately two-thirds of recipients, with a third remaining CRT 'non-responders.' There is an increasing body of evidence exploring the reasons behind non-response, as well as ways to preempt or counteract it.

AREAS COVERED

This review will examine the most recent evidence regarding optimizing outcomes from CRT, as well as explore whether traditional CRT indeed remains the best first-line therapy for electrical resynchronization in HF. We will start by discussing methods of preempting non-response, such as refining patient selection and procedural technique, before reviewing how responses can be optimized post-implantation. For the purpose of this review, evidence was gathered from electronic literature searches (via PubMed and GoogleScholar), with a particular focus on primary evidence published in the last 5 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Ever-expanding research in the field of device therapy has armed physicians with more tools than ever to treat dyssynchronous HF. Newer developments, such as artificial intelligence (AI) guided device programming and conduction system pacing (CSP) are particularly exciting, and we will discuss how they could eventually lead to truly personalized care by maximizing outcomes from CRT.

Lateral QRS amplitude is independently associated with outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy: Advancing patient selection?

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of selected heart failure patients. However, a relevant proportion of patients do not show beneficial response. Identification of simple, additive, and outcome-relevant selection criteria may improve selection of patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether baseline QRS amplitude is associated with outcome in CRT.

METHODS

Quantification of intrinsic, pre-CRT implantation QRS amplitude was performed in an observational multinational 2-center retrospective cohort analysis (derivation cohort Zurich, n = 178, 2000-2015; validation cohort Leuven, n = 183, 1999-2016) with a composite end point of all-cause mortality, ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation at 5 years.

RESULTS

Higher baseline to peak amplitude in lateral leads (lead I and V6) was associated with a lower risk of reaching the composite end point (lead I: hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.95] per millivolt, P = .002; lead V6: hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.00] per millivolt, P = .043). Concordance index-based comparison of quartile, spline, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested cutoff values of 6 mV for lead I and 3 mV for V6 for optimal discrimination of outcome. External validation confirmed the cutoff of 3 mV in lead V6 as a highly significant discriminator of outcome (P < .001) associated with a risk reduction of 65%.

CONCLUSION

Low QRS amplitude in lateral electrocardiogram leads is associated with higher risk of poor outcome in CRT patients. A cutoff of 3 mV in lead V6 proved highly discriminative. Further studies need to confirm the additive value of QRS amplitude in selection of patients for CRT and to assess whether CRT may be made available to more patients.

The Suboptimal QLV Ratio May Indicate the Need for a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade

Background: The QLV ratio (QLV/baseline QRS width) is an established intraoperative-measurable parameter during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, potentially predicting the efficacy of electrical resynchronization. Methods: Left bundle branch area pacing-optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) is a novel approach with the potential to improve both responder rate and responder level in the CRT candidate patient group, even when an optimal electro-anatomical left ventricular lead position is not achievable. In our observational study, 72 CRT-defibrillator candidate patients with a QRS duration of 160 ± 12 ms were consecutively implanted. Using a QLV-ratio-based implant strategy, 40 patients received a biventricular CRT device (Biv-CRT) with an optimal QLV ratio (≥70%). Twenty-eight patients with a suboptimal QLV ratio (<70%) were upgraded intraoperatively to a LOT-CRT system. Patients were followed for 12 months. Results: The postoperative results showed a significantly greater reduction in QRS width in the LOT-CRT patient group compared to the Biv-CRT patients (40.4 ± 14 ms vs. 32 ± 13 ms; p = 0.024). At 12 months, the LOT-CRT group also demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (14.9 ± 8% vs. 10.3 ± 7.4%; p = 0.001), and New York Heart Association functional class (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4; p = 0.031), and a significant decrease in NT-pro-BNP levels (1863± 380 pg/mL vs. 1238 ± 412 pg/mL; p = 0.012). Notably, the LOT-CRT patients showed results comparable to Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio (>80%) in terms of QRS width reduction and LVEF improvement. Conclusions: Our single-center study demonstrated the feasibility of a QLV-ratio-based implantation strategy during CRT implantation. Patients with a LOT-CRT system showed significant improvements, whereas Biv-CRT patients with a super-optimal QLV ratio may not be expected to benefit from an additional LOT-CRT upgrade.

[New pacing strategies for heart failure]

In patients with a reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function (ejection fraction < 35%) and a left bundle branch block with a QRS duration > 130 ms, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can contribute to an improvement in the quality of life and a reduction in mortality. The resynchronization is mostly achieved by pacing via an epicardial LV lead in the coronary sinus; however, this approach is often limited by the patient's venous anatomy and an increase in the stimulation threshold over time. In addition, up to 30% of patients do not respond to the intervention. New treatment approaches involve direct stimulation of the conduction system by pacing of the bundle of His or left bundle branch. This enables a more physiological propagation of the stimulus. Pacing of the left bundle branch is achieved by advancing the lead into the right ventricle and screwing it deep into the interventricular septum. Due to the relatively large target area of the left bundle branch the success rate is very high (currently > 90%). Observational studies have shown a greater reduction in the QRS duration, a more pronounced improvement in systolic function and a lower hospitalization rate for heart failure associated with conduction system pacing compared to CRT using a coronary sinus lead. These findings have been confirmed in small randomized trials. Therefore, the use of left bundle branch pacing should be considered not only as a bail out in the case of failed resynchronization using coronary sinus lead placement but increasingly also as an initial pacing strategy. The results of the first large randomized trials are expected to be released in late 2024.

Landmark Evolutions in Time and Indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results from a Multicenter Retrospective Registry

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has evolved into an established therapy for patients with chronic heart failure and a wide QRS complex. Data on long-term outcomes over time are scarce and the criteria for implantation remain a subject of investigation. Methods: An international, multicenter, retrospective registry includes 2275 patients who received CRT between 30 November 2000 and 31 December 2019, with a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 2.7 years. Four time periods were defined, based on landmark trials and guidelines. The combined endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. Results: The composite endpoint occurred in 656 patients (29.2%). The mean annual implantation rate tripled from 31.5 ± 17.4/year in the first period to 107.4 ± 62.4/year in the last period. In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for the composite endpoint was not statistically different between time periods. When compared to sinus rhythm with left bundle branch block (LBBB), a non-LBBB conduction pattern (sinus rhythm: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.12-2.03; atrial fibrillation: HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.30-3.33) and a QRS duration below 130 ms (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.29-2.09) were associated with a higher hazard ratio. Conclusions: Despite innovations, an adjusted regression analysis revealed stable overall survival over time, which can at least partially be explained by a shift in patient characteristics.

Integration of implantable device therapy in patients with heart failure. A clinical consensus statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Implantable devices form an integral part of the management of patients with heart failure (HF) and provide adjunctive therapies in addition to cornerstone drug treatment. Although the number of these devices is growing, only few are supported by robust evidence. Current devices aim to improve haemodynamics, improve reverse remodelling, or provide electrical therapy. A number of these devices have guideline recommendations and some have been shown to improve outcomes such as cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and long-term mechanical support. For others, more evidence is still needed before large-scale implementation can be strongly advised. Of note, devices and drugs can work synergistically in HF as improved disease control with devices can allow for further optimization of drug therapy. Therefore, some devices might already be considered early in the disease trajectory of HF patients, while others might only be reserved for advanced HF. As such, device therapy should be integrated into HF care programmes. Unfortunately, implementation of devices, including those with the greatest evidence, in clinical care pathways is still suboptimal. This clinical consensus document of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) describes the physiological rationale behind device-provided therapy and also device-guided management, offers an overview of current implantable device options recommended by the guidelines and proposes a new integrated model of device therapy as a part of HF care.

Improved outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in systolic heart failure: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database

Background

Temporal change in outcomes of heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) is unknown.

Methods

We assess outcomes and underlying heart diseases of patients receiving CRT-D with analyzing database of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) at the implantation year 2011-2015 and New JCDTR at the implantation year 2018-2021.

Results

Proportion of nonischemic heart diseases was about 70% in both the groups (JCDTR: 69%; New JCDTR: 72%). Cardiac sarcoidosis increased with the rate of 5% in the JCDTR to 9% in the New JCDTR group. During an average follow-up of 21 months, death from any cause occurred in 167 of 906 patients in the JCDTR group (18%) and 79 of 611 patients in the New JCDTR group (13%) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] in the New JCDTR group, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.94; p = .017). The superiority was mainly driven by reduction in the risk of noncardiac death. With regard to appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, there was a significant reduction in the New JCDTR group versus the JCDTR group (aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59-0.98; p = .032 for appropriate ICD therapy; aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.50; p < .0001 for inappropriate ICD therapy).

Conclusions

All-cause mortality was reduced in CRT-D patients implanted during 2018-2021 compared to those during 2011-2015, with a significant reduction in noncardiac death.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Cardiac Resynchronisation with Conduction System Pacing

To date, biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the standard pacing modality for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. However, it is non-physiological, with the activation spreading between the left ventricular epicardium and right ventricular endocardium. Up to one-third of patients with heart failure who are eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy do not derive benefit from BiVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as an alternative to BiVP for cardiac resynchronisation. There is mounting evidence supporting the benefits of CSP in achieving synchronous ventricular activation and repolarisation. The aim of this review is to summarise the current options and outcomes of CSP when used for cardiac resynchronisation in patients with heart failure.

Electrocardiogram-based deep learning improves outcome prediction following cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

This study aims to identify and visualize electrocardiogram (ECG) features using an explainable deep learning-based algorithm to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcome. Its performance is compared with current guideline ECG criteria and QRSAREA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A deep learning algorithm, trained on 1.1 million ECGs from 251 473 patients, was used to compress the median beat ECG, thereby summarizing most ECG features into only 21 explainable factors (FactorECG). Pre-implantation ECGs of 1306 CRT patients from three academic centres were converted into their respective FactorECG. FactorECG predicted the combined clinical endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device, or heart transplantation [c-statistic 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.72], significantly outperforming QRSAREA and guideline ECG criteria [c-statistic 0.61 (95% CI 0.58-0.64) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.54-0.60), P < 0.001 for both]. The addition of 13 clinical variables was of limited added value for the FactorECG model when compared with QRSAREA (Δ c-statistic 0.03 vs. 0.10). FactorECG identified inferolateral T-wave inversion, smaller right precordial S- and T-wave amplitude, ventricular rate, and increased PR interval and P-wave duration to be important predictors for poor outcome. An online visualization tool was created to provide interactive visualizations (https://crt.ecgx.ai).

CONCLUSION

Requiring only a standard 12-lead ECG, FactorECG held superior discriminative ability for the prediction of clinical outcome when compared with guideline criteria and QRSAREA, without requiring additional clinical variables. End-to-end automated visualization of ECG features allows for an explainable algorithm, which may facilitate rapid uptake of this personalized decision-making tool in CRT.

Dyssynchrony and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Unfavorable Electrical Characteristics

BACKGROUND

Among heart failure (HF) patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), those with unfavorable electrical characteristics (UEC) are less frequently CRT responders.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the relationship between preprocedural echocardiographic parameters of electromechanical dyssynchrony (EMD) and outcome following CRT.

METHODS

Among 551 patients receiving CRT, 121 with UEC, defined as atypical left bundle branch, presence of right bundle branch block, or unspecified intraventricular conduction disturbance, were enrolled. Indices of EMD were presence of septal flash, apical rocking, septal deformation patterns, and global wasted work (GWW), determined with the use of speckle-tracking strain echocardiography. Endpoints were response to CRT, defined as a relative decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at 9-month postoperative follow-up, and all-cause death or HF hospitalization during follow-up.

RESULTS

Among the 121 patients, 68 (56%) were CRT responders. In multivariate analysis, GWW ≥200 mm Hg% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.17 [95% CI: 1.33-14.56]; P = 0.0182) and longitudinal strain septal contraction patterns 1 and 2 (aOR: 10.05 [95% CI: 2.82-43.97]; P < 0.001) were associated with CRT response. During a 46-month follow-up (IQR: 42-55 months), survival free from death or HF hospitalization increased with the number of positive criteria (87% for 2, 59% for 1, and 27% for 0). After adjustment for established predictors of outcome in patients receiving CRT, absence of either of the 2 criteria remained associated with a considerable increased risk of death and/or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR: 4.83 [95% CI: 1.84-12.68]; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with UEC, echocardiographic assessment of EMD may help to select patients who will derive benefit from CRT.

Interamerican Society of Cardiology (CIFACAH - ELECTROSIAC)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS): multidisciplinary review on the appropriate use of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure

Epidemiological studies suggest that approximately half of the patients with heart failure (HF) have reduced ejection fraction, while the other half have normal ejection fraction (EF). Currently, international guidelines consider QRS duration greater than 130 ms, in the presence of ventricular dysfunction (EF < 35%), as a criterion for selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). CRT helps restore intraventricular and auriculoventricular synchrony, improving left ventricular (LV) performance, reducing functional mitral regurgitation, and inducing reverse LV remodeling. This is evidenced by increased LV filling time and left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, mitral regurgitation, and septal dyskinesia. Because the mechanisms of dyssynchrony may be heterogeneous, no single measure may accurately predict response to CRT. Finally, CRT has been progressively shown to be safe and feasible, improves functional status and quality of life, reversely remodels the LV, decreases the number of hospitalizations, total mortality in patients with refractory HF, LV dysfunction, and intraventricular conduction disorders; is a pacemaker-based therapy for HF and thanks to current technology, safe remote monitoring of almost all types of cardiac devices is possible and provides useful alerts in clinical practice.

Fifteen-Year Differences in Indications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in International Guidelines-Insights from the Heart Failure Registries of the European Society of Cardiology

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) applied to selected patients with heart failure (HF) improves their prognosis. In recent years, eligibility criteria for CRT have regularly changed. This study aimed to investigate the changes in eligibility of real-life HF patients for CRT over the past fifteen years. We reviewed European and North American guidelines from this period and applied them to HF patients from the ESC-HF Pilot and ESC-Long-Term Registries. Taking into consideration the criteria assessed in this study (including all classes of recommendations i.e., class I, IIa and IIb, as well as patients with AF and SR), the 2013 (ESC) guidelines would have qualified the most patients for CRT (266, 18.3%), while the 2015 (ESC) guidelines would have qualified the least (115, 7.9%; p-value for differences between all analyzed papers <0.0001). There were only 26 patients (1.8%) who would be eligible for CRT using the class I recommendations across all of the guidelines. These results demonstrate the variability in recommendations for CRT over the years. Moreover, this data indicates underuse of this form of pacing in HF and highlights the need for more studies in order to improve the outcomes of HF patients and further personalize their management.

What Have We Learned in the Last 20 Years About CRT Non-Responders?

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become well established in the treatment of heart failure, the management of patients who do not respond after CRT remains a key challenge. This review will summarize what we have learned about non-responders over the last 20 years and discuss methods for optimizing response, including the introduction of novel therapies.

Generating Evidence to Support the Physiologic Promise of Conduction System Pacing: Status and Update on Conduction System Pacing Trials

Conduction system pacing avoids the potential deleterious effects of right ventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and provides an alternative approach to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We focus on the available observational and randomized evidence and review studies supporting the safety, feasibility, and physiologic promise of conduction system approaches. We evaluate the randomized data generated from the available clinical trials of conduction system pacing, which have led to the recent inclusion of CSP in international guidelines. The scope for future randomized trials will building on the physiologic promise of conduction system approaches and offering information on clinical end points is explored.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. Structure: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing In Patients with Heart Failure and Right Bundle Branch Block: Results From International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing has limited efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF) and right bundle branch block (RBBB). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiologic pacing option.

Objective

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of LBBAP in HF patients with RBBB and reduced left ventricular systolic function, and indication for CRT or ventricular pacing.

Methods

LBBAP was attempted in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, RBBB, HF, and indications for CRT or ventricular pacing. Procedural, pacing, and electrocardiographic parameters; clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class); and echocardiographic response (≥5% increase in ejection fraction) to LBBAP were assessed.

Results

LBBAP was attempted in 121 patients and successful in 107 (88%). Patient characteristics included age 74 ± 12 years, female 25%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 49%, and ejection fraction 35% ± 9%. QRS axis at baseline was normal in 24%, left axis 63%, right axis 13%. LBBAP threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.8 ± 0.3 V @ 0.5 ms and 10 ± 9 mV at implant and remained stable during mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months. LBBAP resulted in narrowing of QRS duration (156 ± 20 ms to 150 ± 24 ms (P = .01) with R-wave peak times in V₆ of 85 ± 16 ms. LVEF improved from 35% ± 9% to 43% ± 12% (P < .01). Clinical and echocardiographic response was observed in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively. Female sex and reduction in QRS duration with LBBAP were predictive of echocardiographic response and super-response.

Conclusion

LBBAP is a feasible alternative to deliver CRT or physiologic ventricular pacing in patients with RBBB, HF, and LV dysfunction.

Population-Level Impact of the Guidelines Update on Patient Selection and Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to analyze the impact of the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) guidelines for cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) update on utilization and efficacy of CRT-D.

BACKGROUND

In September 2012, the ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines for CRT-D were modified to include left bundle branch block (LBBB) as a Class I indication.

METHODS

The IBM Watson MarketScan Database was queried between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2018, for CRT-D implants or upgrades. The primary outcome was heart failure (HF) hospitalization following left ventricular lead implant. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and device-related lead revision.

RESULTS

A total of 27,238 patients were analyzed: 18,384 pre-update and 8,854 post-update. Mean age was 69 ± 11 years, 73% men, and 98% with history of HF hospitalization. The proportion of patients with LBBB increased from 29% to 55% (P < 0.001) after the update. Patients receiving CRT-D post-update demonstrated a greater prevalence of comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation (47% vs 40%; P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (45% vs 39%; P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (24% vs 15%; P < 0.001), and HF hospitalization in the year before CRT-D (40% vs 37%; P < 0.001). Despite greater baseline comorbidities, HF hospitalization significantly declined post-update (HR: 0.89; P < 0.001). Multivariate predictors of reduced HF hospitalization included angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor prescription (HR: 0.48; P < 0.001) and presence of LBBB (HR: 0.71; P < 0.001). All-cause mortality was not significantly different between the 2 groups, and fewer lead revisions were noted post-update (0.6% vs 1.7%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The revised 2012 guidelines led to an increased proportion of LBBB patients receiving CRT-D at the population-level. This change was associated with reduced HF hospitalization, despite broadening therapy to patients with more comorbid conditions.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure

AIM

The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021.

STRUCTURE

Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

Predictors of echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review with Meta-Analysis

•

NYHA class II seems to predict response to CRT.

•

We should not delay CRT, trying medical management first, even in mildly symptomatic patients.

•

Atrial fibrillation patients must have the same indication for CRT as those in sinus rhythm.

Background

At least 30% of the patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies trying to identify predictors of response to CRT.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for observational prospective studies, referring the evaluation of response to CRT, defined as a decrease in left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥ 15% at 6-month follow-up, via two-dimensional echocardiography.

Results

A total of 24 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed that female gender (p = 0.018), non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (p < 0.001), left bundle branch morphology (LBBB) (p = 0.001), longer QRS (p < 0.001) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II (p = 0.014) appear to favor response to CRT. After ROC analysis and logistic regression procedures, female gender (kappa = 0.450; p < 0.001), NICM (kappa = 0.636; p < 0.001), LBBB (kappa = 0.935; p < 0.001), and NYHA class II (kappa = 0.647; p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of response to CRT, being LBBB the most reliable one (sensitivity = 97.24%; specificity = 98.86%).

Conclusions

Female gender, NICM, LBBB and NYHA class II are baseline variables with an apparent capability to independently predict response to CRT, being LBBB the most reliable one.

Evolving concept of dyssynchrony and its utility

The role of electromechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure gained prominence in literature with the results of trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). CRT has shown to significantly decrease heart failure hospitalization and mortality in heart failure patients with dyssynchrony. Current guidelines recommend the use of electrical dyssynchrony based on a QRS > 150 ms and a left bundle branch block pattern on surface electrocardiogram to identify dyssynchrony in patients who will benefit from CRT implantation. However, predicting response to CRT remains a challenge with nearly one-third of patients gaining no benefit from the device. Multiple echocardiographic measures of mechanical dyssynchrony have been studied over the past two decade. However, trials where mechanical dyssynchrony used as an additional or lone criteria for CRT failed to show any benefit in the response to CRT. This shows that a deeper understanding of cardiac mechanics should be applied in the assessment of dyssynchrony. This review discusses the evolving role of imaging techniques in assessing cardiac dyssynchrony and their application in patients considered for device therapy.

Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria that may improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an evidence-based effective therapy of symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction refractory to optimal medical treatment associated with intraventricular conduction disturbance, that results in electrical dyssynchrony and further deterioration of systolic ventricular function. However, the non-response rate to CRT is still 20%-40%, which can be decreased by better patient selection. The main determinant of CRT outcome is the presence or absence of significant ventricular dyssynchrony and the ability of the applied CRT technique to eliminate it. The current guidelines recommend the determination of QRS morphology and QRS duration and the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction for patient selection for CRT. However, QRS morphology and QRS duration are not perfect indicators of electrical dyssynchrony, which is the cause of the not negligible non-response rate to CRT and the missed CRT implantation in a significant number of patients who have the appropriate substrate for CRT. Using imaging modalities, many ventricular dyssynchrony criteria were devised for the detection of mechanical dyssynchrony, but their utility in patient selection for CRT is not yet proven, therefore their use is not recommended for this purpose. Moreover, CRT can eliminate only mechanical dyssynchrony due to underlying electrical dyssynchrony, for this reason ECG has a greater role in the detection of ventricular dyssynchrony than imaging modalities. To improve assessment of electrical dyssynchrony, we devised two novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria, which can estimate interventricular and left ventricular intraventricular dyssynchrony in order to improve patient selection for CRT. Here we discuss the results achieved by the application of these new ECG dyssynchrony criteria, which proved to be useful in predicting the CRT response in patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern (the second greatest group of CRT candidates), and the significance of other new ECG dyssynchrony criteria in the potential improvement of CRT outcome.

A different cardiac resynchronization therapy technique might be needed in some patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern

BACKGROUND

Current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), devised to eliminate dyssynchrony in left bundle branch block (LBBB), works by pacing the latest activated left ventricular site (LALVS). We hypothesized that patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance (NICD) pattern respond less favorably to CRT, because their LALVS is far away from that in LBBB.

METHODS

By measuring the amplitude and polarity of secondary ST-segment alterations in two optional frontal and horizontal surface electrocardiogram (ECG) leads and using a software, we determined the resultant 3D spatial secondary ST vector, which is directed 180^o away from the LALVS, in 110 patients with LBBB pattern and 77 patients with NICD pattern and heart failure. To validate the ECG method, we also estimated the LALVS by echocardiography using 3D parametric imaging and 2D speckle tracking in 22 LBBB patients and 20 NICD patients. Patients with NICD pattern were subdivided according to their non-overlapping frontal plane resultant secondary ST vector ranges to the NICD-1 subgroup (n = 44) and the NICD-2 subgroup (n = 33).

RESULTS

Based on the software determined coordinates of the resultant 3D spatial secondary ST vector directed 180^o away from the LALVS, the LALVSs were located leftward, posterosuperior in the LBBB group, slightly left, superior in the NICD-1 subgroup, and slightly left, posteroinferior in the NICD-2 subgroup. The LALVS determined by ECG and echocardiography matched in all patients, except two.

CONCLUSIONS

In the NICD-2 subgroup, a remote LALVS was found from that in LBBB pattern, which might explain the high non-response rate of the NICD pattern to the current CRT technique.

Prediction of response after cardiac resynchronization therapy with machine learning

AIMS

Nearly one third of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) suffer non-response. We intend to develop predictive models using machine learning (ML) approaches and easily attainable features before CRT implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of 752 CRT recipients from two hospitals were retrospectively collected. Nine ML predictive models were established, including logistic regression (LR), elastic network (EN), lasso regression (Lasso), ridge regression (Ridge), neural network (NN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), XGBoost and k-nearest neighbour (k-NN). Sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, F1, log-loss, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AU-ROC), and average precision (AP) of each model were evaluated. AU-ROC was compared between models and the latest guidelines. Six models had an AU-ROC value above 0.75. The LR, EN and Ridge models showed the highest overall predictive power compared with other models with AU-ROC at 0.77. The XGBoost model reached the highest sensitivity at 0.72, while the highest specificity was achieved by Ridge model at 0.92. All ML models achieved higher AU-ROCs that those derived from the latest guidelines (all P < 0.05). The effect size analysis identified left bundle branch block, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, and history of percutaneous coronary intervention as the most crucial predictors of CRT response. An online tool to facilitate the prediction of CRT response is freely available at http://www.crt-response.com/.

CONCLUSIONS

ML algorithms produced efficient predictive models for evaluation of CRT response with features before implantation. Tools developed accordingly could improve the selection of CRT candidates and reduce the incidence of non-response.

Re-worsening left ventricular ejection fraction after response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) provided functional and clinical improvement in patients with heart failure (HF) and electrical intraventricular conduction disturbances, some patients had re-worsening left ventricular (LV) function after a favorable CRT response. We analyzed the clinical variables and cardiac outcomes associated with this re-worsening LV function after CRT.

METHODS

In this study, 71 patients with CRT response who received CRT between 2006 and 2017 were included. CRT response was defined as a "≥ 10% improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on follow-up." Patients were classified into two groups: (i) persistent: (n = 48, 68%), defined as those with a CRT response and (ii) re-worsening: (n = 23, 32%), consisting of those who fell out of the definition of a CRT response after an initial CRT response.

RESULTS

Half of the patients in the re-worsening group failed to maintain a CRT response from two years upwards. A longer duration from HF diagnosis to CRT implantation, nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NIVCD) on electrocardiogram at CRT implantation, and a lower increased LVEF at initial CRT response were independent predictors for the re-worsening group. Patients in the re-worsening group had a higher incidence rate for HF hospitalization and cardiac deaths, compared with those in the persistent group.

CONCLUSION

One-third of CRT responders experienced re-worsening LVEF, which was associated with poor outcomes. CRT responders with NIVCD, longer HF duration, and a lower increased LVEF at initial CRT response should be monitored with caution.

A Simple Predictive Marker in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients: Prominent S-Wave in Right Precordial Leads

Background and objectives: Current guidelines criteria do not satisfactorily discriminate responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). QRS amplitude is an established index to recognize the severity of myocardial disturbance and might be a key to optimal patient selection for CRT. Materials and Methods: (1) Initial R-wave amplitude, (2) S-wave amplitude, and (3) a summation of maximal R- or R′-wave amplitude and S-wave amplitude were measured at baseline. These parameters were averaged according to right (V1 to V3) or left (V4 to V6) precordial leads. The impact of these parameters on response to CRT, which was defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at six-month follow-up, was investigated. Results: Among 47 patients (71 years old, 28 men) who received guideline-indicated CRT implantation, 25 (53%) achieved the definition of CRT responder. Among baseline electrocardiogram parameters, only the higher S-wave amplitude in right precordial leads was an independent predictor of CRT responders (odds ratio: 2.181, 95% confidence interval: 1.078–4.414, p = 0.030) at a cutoff of 1.44 mV. The cutoff was independently associated with cumulative incidence of heart failure readmission and appropriate electrical defibrillation following CRT implantation (p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: Prominent S-wave in right precordial leads might be a promising index to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling and greater clinical outcomes following CRT implantation.

Simple electrophysiological predictor of QRS change induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy: A novel marker of complete left bundle branch block

BACKGROUND

QRS complex shortening by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been associated with improved outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the absence of QRS duration (QRSd) prolongation by right ventricular mid-septal pacing (RVP) may indicate complete left bundle branch block (cLBBB).

METHODS

We prospectively collected 12-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) and intracardiac electrograms during CRT implant procedures. Digital recordings were edited and manually measured. The outcome measure was a change in QRSd induced by CRT (delta CRT). Several outcome predictors were investigated: native QRSd, cLBBB (by using Strauss criteria), interval between the onset of the QRS complex and the local left ventricular electrogram (Q-LV), and a newly proposed index defined by the difference between RVP and native QRSd (delta RVP).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three consecutive patients were included in the study. Delta RVP was 27 ± 25 ms, and delta CRT was -14 ± 28 ms. Delta CRT correlated with native QRSd (r = -0.65), with the presence of ECG-based cLBBB (r = -0.40), with Q-LV (r = -0.68), and with delta RVP (r = 0.72) (P < .00001 for all correlations). In multivariable analysis, delta CRT was most strongly associated with delta RVP (P < .00001), followed by native QRSd and Q-LV, while ECG-based cLBBB became a nonsignificant factor.

CONCLUSION

Baseline QRSd, delta RVP, and LV electrical lead position (Q-LV) represent strong independent predictors of ECG response to CRT. The absence of QRSd prolongation by RVP may serve as an alternative and more specific marker of cLBBB. Delta RVP correlates strongly with the CRT effect on QRSd and outperforms the predictive value of ECG-based cLBBB.

Left Ventricular Deformation and Vortex Analysis in Heart Failure: From Ultrasound Technique to Current Clinical Application

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, its symptoms and signs are not specific or can be absent. In this context, transthoracic echocardiography plays a key role in diagnosing the various forms of HF, guiding therapeutic decision making and monitoring response to therapy. Over the last few decades, new ultrasound modalities have been introduced in the field of echocardiography, aiming at better understanding the morpho-functional abnormalities occurring in cardiovascular diseases. However, they are still struggling to enter daily and routine use. In our review article, we turn the spotlight on some of the newest ultrasound technologies; in particular, analysis of myocardial deformation by speckle tracking echocardiography, and intracardiac flow dynamics by color Doppler flow mapping, highlighting their promising applications to HF diagnosis and management. We also focus on the importance of these imaging modalities in the selection of responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Six months clinical outcome comparison between quadripolar and bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, single-centre observational study

Background and objectives

Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offer multi-vector pacing with different pacing configurations and hence enabling LV pacing at most suitable site with better lead stability. We aim to compare the outcomes between quadripolar and bipolar LV lead in patients receiving CRT.

Methods

In this prospective, non-randomized, single-center observational study, we enrolled 93 patients receiving CRT with bipolar (BiP) (n = 31) and quadripolar (Quad) (n = 62) LV lead between August 2016 to August 2019. Patients were followed for six months, and outcomes were compared with respect to CRT response (defined as ≥5% absolute increase in left ventricle ejection fraction), electrocardiographic, echocardiographic parameters, NYHA functional class improvement, and incidence of LV lead-related complication.

Results

At the end of six months follow up, CRT with quadripolar lead was associated with better response rate as compared to bipolar pacing (85.48% vs 64.51%; p = 0.03), lesser heart failure (HF) hospitalization events (1.5 vs 2; p = 0.04) and better improvement in HF symptoms (patients with ≥1 NYHA improvement 87.09% vs 67.74%; p = 0.04). There were fewer deaths per 100 patient-year (6.45 vs 9.37; p = 0.04) and more narrowing of QRS duration (Δ12.56 ± 3.11 ms vs Δ7.29 ± 1.87 ms; p = 0.04) with quadripolar lead use. Lead related complications were significantly more with the use of bipolar lead (74.19% vs 41.94%; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Our prospective, non-randomized, single-center observational study reveals that patients receiving CRT with quadripolar leads have a better response to therapy, lesser heart failure hospitalizations, lower all-cause mortality, and fewer lead-related complications, proving its superiority over the bipolar lead.

Novel Non-Invasive Index for Prediction of Responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using High-Resolution Magnetocardiography

BACKGROUND

Approximately one-third of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated whether the left ventricular (LV) conduction pattern on magnetocardiography (MCG) can predict CRT responders.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective study enrolled 56 patients with advanced HF (mean [±SD] LV ejection fraction [LVEF] 23±8%; QRS duration 145±19 ms) and MCG recorded before CRT. MCG-QRS current arrow maps were classified as multidirectional (MDC; n=28) or unidirectional (UDC; n=28) conduction based on a change of either ≥35° or <35°, respectively, in the direction of the maximal current arrow after the QRS peak. Baseline New York Heart Association functional class and LVEF were comparable between the 2 groups, but QRS duration was longer and the presence of complete left bundle branch block and LV dyssynchrony was higher in the UDC than MDC group. Six months after CRT, 30 patients were defined as responders, with significantly more in the UDC than MDC group (89% vs. 14%, respectively; P<0.001). Over a 5-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed that adverse cardiac events (death or implantation of an LV assist device) were less frequently observed in the UDC than MDC group (6/28 vs. 15/28, respectively; P=0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed that UDC on MCG was the most significant predictor of CRT response (odds ratio 69.8; 95% confidence interval 13.14-669.32; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative non-invasive MCG may predict the CRT response and long-term outcome after CRT.

Should different ECG QRS duration criteria be used for men and women with heart failure for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

In the present paper we review data of the efficacy of CRT based on baseline QRS duration and morphology in patients with heart failure due to left ventricle systolic dysfunction. We specifically review data that analyzed men and women separately. The main findings suggest benefit of CRT in patients with baseline LBBB, but not in patients without LBBB. Benefit is directly related to QRS duration at baseline with increasing rates and magnitude of echocardiographic response (in terms of improvement in ejection fraction and decrease in LV size) and clinical response with increasing baseline QRS. The effect was most pronounced when QRSd was above 150 ms. Among women treated with CRT, similar to men, the benefit is also confined mainly to patients with baseline LBBB. In contrast to men benefit is evident starting with QRSd >130 ms. These findings may suggest that different QRS duration criteria should be used for men and women considered for CRT.

Differences in clinical characteristics and reported quality of life of men and women undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to be associated with a number of clinical characteristics, including QRS duration and morphology, gender, height, and the aetiology of heart failure (HF). We assessed the relation of gender and baseline characteristics with QRS duration and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AdaptResponse is a global randomized trial. The trial enrolled CRT-indicated patients with New York Heart Association classes II-IV HF, left bundle branch block (QRS ≥ 140 ms in men, ≥130 ms in women), and baseline PR interval ≤200 ms. In total, 3620 patients were randomized, including 1569 women (43.3%) approaching the actual proportion of women in the HF population. Women were older and more often New York Heart Association class III or IV than men (55.6% vs. 48.7%), had less frequent ischaemic cardiomyopathy (21.2% vs. 39.5%), and had a 5.1 ms shorter QRS duration than men. Women were more often depressed (18.5% vs. 9.7%), had a significantly lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and had differences in medication prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

AdaptResponse is the largest randomized CRT trial and enrolled more women than any other landmark CRT trial. Women differed from men with regard to baseline characteristics and quality of life. Whether these differences translate into clinical outcome differences will be examined further in the AdaptResponse trial.

Are all left bundle branch blocks the same? Myocardial mechanical implications by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

AIMS

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is usually associated with structural myocardial diseases progressively leading to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We sought to determine the mechanical implications of LBBB (as defined based on Strauss' criteria) by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR).

METHOD AND RESULTS

We included consecutive patients referred to CMR to assess the structural cause of LBBB. CMR scans consisted of cine, stress perfusion, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Myocardial deformation was assessed by tissue tracking analysis; LGE was quantified using the full width at half maximum method. We included 86 patients [63% male, 70 years (60-72)] with mean QRS duration 150 ± 13 msec. A structural disease was identified on CMR in 53% of patients (ischemic heart disease, IHD, 31%; non-ischemic heart disease, NIHD, 22%), while LBBB-related septal dyssynchrony (SD) was the only abnormality in 47%. LGE was found in 42% of patients. LVEF and myocardial deformation were impaired. Despite similar ECG characteristics, myocardial strain differed significantly between IHD, NIHD and SD patients, and patients with SD showed less impaired myocardial deformation. Indexed LV end-systolic volume and LGE extent were independently associated with impaired strain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LBBB show different structural and mechanical properties, and LGE extent has an unfavourable effect on myocardial mechanics.

Resynchronizing Right and Left Ventricles With Right Bundle Branch Block in the Congenital Heart Disease Population

OBJECTIVES

This study describes a single center experience with the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in a difficult patient population, including single systemic right ventricles (RVs), subpulmonary RVs, and left ventricles (LVs) with right bundle branch block (RBBB).

BACKGROUND

CRT remains challenging in the congenital heart disease population.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing resynchronization of single RVs, subpulmonary RVs, or LVs in the setting of RBBB were identified between 2016 and 2019. Patients who had CRT performed for complete heart block or had <3 months of follow-up were excluded. Patients underwent pre-procedural advanced imaging by echocardiogram, computed tomography, or cardiac magnetic resonance to assess ventricular function and synchrony; intraoperative mapping was performed to identify optimal lead placement.

RESULTS

All patients undergoing resynchronization presented with at least moderate systolic ventricular dysfunction in the setting of intrinsic atrioventricular nodal conduction and RBBB. Seven patients were identified. Two patients underwent CRT of a single RV, 3 with subpulmonary RVs and 2 with systemic LVs. The median age at CRT was 5 years (range 0.6 to 48 years). The median follow-up was 9 months (range 3 to 18 months). The median baseline QRS duration was 180 ms (range 115 to 260ms). Post-CRT, the QRS duration decreased by a median of 34% (range 19% to 38%). All patients had improvement in their systolic ventricular function.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted resynchronization in systemic and subpulmonary RVs can be used to improve ventricular function and heart failure in the congenital heart disease population. Similar techniques can be applied to successfully treat patients with LV dysfunction and RBBB and improve their long-term outcomes.

Impact of delayed ventricular wall area ratio on pathophysiology of mechanical dyssynchrony: implication from single-ventricle physiology and 0D modeling

Electrical disparity can induce inefficient cardiac performance, representing an uncoordinated wall motion at an earlier activated ventricular wall: an early shortening followed by a systolic rebound stretch. Although regional contractility and distensibility modulate this pathological motion, the effect of a morphological factor has not been emphasized. Our strain analysis in 62 patients with single ventricle revealed that those with an activation delay in 60-70% of ventricular wall area suffered from cardiac dysfunction and mechanical discoordination along with prolonged QRS duration. A computational simulation with a two-compartment ventricular model also suggested that the ventricle with an activation delay in 70% of the total volume was most vulnerable to a large activation delay, accompanied by an uncoordinated motion at an earlier activated wall. Taken together, the ratio of the delayed ventricular wall has a significant impact on the pathophysiology due to an activation delay, potentially highlighting an indicator of cardiac dysfunction.

Septal Flash-like Motion of the Earlier Activated Ventricular Wall Represents the Pathophysiology of Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Single-Ventricle Anatomy

BACKGROUND

In biventricular physiology, abnormal septal motion is a hallmark of mechanical dyssynchrony in the left bundle branch block. However, in single-ventricle (SV) physiology, morphologic variations in systemic ventricles pose a challenge in evaluating the negative impact of mechanical dyssynchrony. The present study aimed to characterize the pathologic dyssynchronous contraction patterns in patients with SV.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 70 consecutive postoperative patients with SV anatomy with prolonged QRS duration (25 female patients; median age, 14 years) were enrolled. We divided each SV into two regions and analyzed independent strains using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. From an earlier activated ventricular wall, we calculated the strain ratio (R_strains) of two values (%) during the QRS period and the ejection period: (100 + Strain_ejection)/(100 + Strain_QRS). We reviewed the clinical profiles, B-type natriuretic peptide plasma levels, exercise capacity, and morbidity. Six patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were analyzed regarding changes in strain patterns and ventricular volume.

RESULTS

Higher R_strains, indicating a preceding contraction and subsequent dyskinetic dilation of the earlier activated ventricular wall, was associated with increased B-type natriuretic peptide, reduced exercise capacity, and poor outcome. However, delayed contraction of the later activated ventricular wall was not associated with the effects. Decreases in R_strains and ventricular volume reductions were observed in all patients after CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

A specific strain pattern in an earlier activated ventricular wall indicates mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with SV. This pattern is very similar to the septal flash in adult patients with left bundle branch block. This strategy might be a promising approach for selecting appropriate candidates for CRT in patients with SV.