Rationale and design of CH STRONG: Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG

Neighborhood social deprivation and healthcare utilization, disability, and comorbidities among young adults with congenital heart defects: Congenital heart survey to recognize outcomes, needs, and well-being 2016-2019

BACKGROUND

Research on the association between neighborhood social deprivation and health among adults with congenital heart defects (CHD) is sparse.

METHODS

We evaluated the associations between neighborhood social deprivation and health care utilization, disability, and comorbidities using the population-based 2016-2019 Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG (CH STRONG) of young adults. Participants were identified from active birth defect surveillance systems in three U.S. sites and born with CHD between 1980 and 1997. We linked census tract-level 2017 American Community Survey information on median household income, percent of ≥25-year-old with greater than a high school degree, percent of ≥16-year-olds who are unemployed, and percent of families with children <18 years old living in poverty to survey data and used these variables to calculate a summary neighborhood social deprivation z-score, divided into tertiles. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) derived from a log-linear regression model with a Poisson distribution estimated the association between tertile of neighborhood social deprivation and healthcare utilization in previous year (no encounters, 1 and ≥2 emergency room [ER] visits, and hospital admission), ≥1 disability, and ≥1 comorbidities. We accounted for age, place of birth, sex at birth, presence of chromosomal anomalies, and CHD severity in all models, and, additionally educational attainment and work status in all models except disability.

RESULTS

Of the 1435 adults with CHD, 43.8% were 19-24 years old, 54.4% were female, 69.8% were non-Hispanic White, and 33.7% had a severe CHD. Compared to the least deprived tertile, respondents in the most deprived tertile were more likely to have no healthcare visit (aPR: 1.5 [95% CI: 1.1, 2.1]), ≥2 ER visits (1.6 [1.1, 2.3]), or hospitalization (1.6 [1.1, 2.3]) in the previous 12 months, a disability (1.2 [1.0, 1.5]), and ≥1 cardiac comorbidities (1.8 [1.2, 2.7]).

CONCLUSIONS

Neighborhood social deprivation may be a useful metric to identify patients needing additional resources and referrals.

Survival From Birth Until Young Adulthood Among Individuals With Congenital Heart Defects: CH STRONG

BACKGROUND

Limited population-based information is available on long-term survival of US individuals with congenital heart defects (CHDs). Therefore, we assessed patterns in survival from birth until young adulthood (ie, 35 years of age) and associated factors among a population-based sample of US individuals with CHDs.

METHODS

Individuals born between 1980 and 1997 with CHDs identified in 3 US birth defect surveillance systems were linked to death records through 2015 to identify those deceased and the year of their death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for infant mortality (ie, death during the first year of life), and Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival after the first year of life (aHRs) were used to estimate the probability of survival and associated factors. Standardized mortality ratios compared infant mortality, >1-year mortality, >10-year mortality, and >20-year mortality among individuals with CHDs with general population estimates.

RESULTS

Among 11 695 individuals with CHDs, the probability of survival to 35 years of age was 81.4% overall, 86.5% among those without co-occurring noncardiac anomalies, and 92.8% among those who survived the first year of life. Characteristics associated with both infant mortality and reduced survival after the first year of life, respectively, included severe CHDs (aRR=4.08; aHR=3.18), genetic syndromes (aRR=1.83; aHR=3.06) or other noncardiac anomalies (aRR=1.54; aHR=2.53), low birth weight (aRR=1.70; aHR=1.29), and Hispanic (aRR=1.27; aHR=1.42) or non-Hispanic Black (aRR=1.43; aHR=1.80) maternal race and ethnicity. Individuals with CHDs had higher infant mortality (standardized mortality ratio=10.17), >1-year mortality (standardized mortality ratio=3.29), and >10-year and >20-year mortality (both standardized mortality ratios ≈1.5) than the general population; however, after excluding those with noncardiac anomalies, >1-year mortality for those with nonsevere CHDs and >10-year and >20-year mortality for those with any CHD were similar to the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Eight in 10 individuals with CHDs born between1980 and 1997 survived to 35 years of age, with disparities by CHD severity, noncardiac anomalies, birth weight, and maternal race and ethnicity. Among individuals without noncardiac anomalies, those with nonsevere CHDs experienced similar mortality between 1 and 35 years of age as in the general population, and those with any CHD experienced similar mortality between 10 and 35 years of age as in the general population.

Reproductive Health Counseling and Concerns Among Women with Congenital Heart Defects With and Without Disabilities

Background: Women with disabilities are less likely to receive reproductive health counseling than women without disabilities. Yet, little is known about reproductive health counseling and concerns among women with congenital heart defects (CHD) and disabilities. Methods: We used population-based survey data from 778 women aged 19 to 38 years with CHD to examine contraceptive and pregnancy counseling and pregnancy concerns and experiences by disability status, based on six validated questions on vision, hearing, mobility, cognition, self-care, and living independently. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to examine adjusted prevalence ratios between disability status and each outcome, adjusted for CHD severity, age, race/ethnicity, place of birth (Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia), and insurance type. Results: Women with disabilities (n = 323) were 1.4 and 2.3 times more likely than women without disabilities (n = 455) to receive clinician counseling on safe contraceptive methods and avoiding pregnancy because of their CHD. Women with CHD and disabilities, compared to those without disabilities, were more likely to be concerned about their ability to have children (aPR = 1.2) and to have delayed or avoided pregnancy (aPR = 2.2); they were less likely to have ever been pregnant (aPR = 0.7). Associations differed slightly across specific disability types. All associations remained after excluding 71 women with chromosomal anomalies. Conclusion: Among women with CHD, reproductive counseling, concerns, and experiences differ by disability status.

Cardiology Care and Loss to Follow-Up Among Adults With Congenital Heart Defects in CH STRONG

Many of the estimated 1.4 million adults with congenital heart defects (CHDs) in the United States are lost to follow-up (LTF) despite recommendations for ongoing cardiology care. Using 2016 to 2019 CH STRONG (Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG) data, we describe cardiac care among community-based adults with CHD, born in 1980 to 1997, identified through state birth defects registries. Our estimates of LTF were standardized to the CH STRONG eligible population and likely more generalizable to adults with CHD than clinic-based data. Half of our sample were LTF and more than 45% had not received cardiology care in over 5 years. Of those who received care, only 1 in 3 saw an adult CHD physician at their last encounter. Not knowing they needed to see a cardiologist, being told they no longer needed cardiology care, and feeling "well" were the top reasons for LTF, and only half of respondents report doctors discussing the need for cardiac follow-up.

Reproductive Health of Women with Congenital Heart Defects

This report provides an overview of the unique reproductive health issues facing women with congenital heart defects (CHDs) and of the clinical care and professional guidelines on contraception, preconception care, and pregnancy for this population. It describes Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) activities related to surveillance of reproductive health issues among females with CHDs. It also describes CDC's work bringing awareness to physicians who provide care to adolescents and women with CHDs, including obstetrician/gynecologists, about the need for lifelong cardiology care for their patients with CHDs.

Health Insurance Status and Access to Healthcare Among Young Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: from the Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs and Well-beinG (CH STRONG), 2016-2019

Having health insurance is associated with better access to healthcare and lower rates of comorbidity in the general population, but data are limited on insurance's impact on adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). The Congenital Heart Survey To Recognize Outcomes, Needs and well-beinG (CH STRONG) was conducted among ACHD in three locations from 2016 to 2019. We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the associations between health insurance and both access to healthcare and presence of comorbidities. We also compared health insurance and comorbidities among ACHD to similarly-aged individuals in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) as a proxy for the general population. Of 1354 CH STRONG respondents, the majority were ≤ 30 years old (83.5%), and 8.8% were uninsured versus 17.7% in the BRFSS (p < 0.01). Compared to insured ACHD, uninsured were less likely to report regular medical care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.3) and visited an emergency room more often (aOR 1.6, CI 1.0-2.3). Among all ACHD reporting disability, uninsured individuals less frequently received benefits (aOR 0.1, CI 0.0-0.3). Depression was common among uninsured ACHD (22.5%), but insured ACHD had lower rates of depression than insured in the BRFSS (13.3% vs. 22.5%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, rates of insurance were higher among ACHD compared to the general population. Nonetheless, uninsured ACHD inconsistently accessed healthcare and benefits. Further studies are needed to determine if insurance ameliorates the risk of morbidity as ACHD age.

Advance Care Directives Among a Population-Based Sample of Young Adults with Congenital Heart Defects, CH STRONG, 2016-2019

Little is known about advance care planning among young adults with congenital heart defects (CHD). Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and well-beinG (CH STRONG) participants were born with CHD between 1980 and 1997, identified using active, population-based birth defects surveillance systems in Arkansas, Arizona and Atlanta, and Georgia, and surveyed during 2016-2019. We estimated the percent having an advance care directive standardized to the site, year of birth, sex, maternal race, and CHD severity of the 9312 CH STRONG-eligible individuals. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for characteristics associated with having advance care directives. Of 1541 respondents, 34.1% had severe CHD, 54.1% were female, and 69.6% were non-Hispanic white. After standardization, 7.3% had an advance care directive (range: 2.5% among non-Hispanic blacks to 17.4% among individuals with "poor" perceived health). Individuals with severe CHD (10.5%, aOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3), with public insurance (13.1%, aOR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1-2.7), with non-cardiac congenital anomalies (11.1%, aOR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7), and who were hospitalized in the past year (13.3%, aOR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.8) were more likely than their counterparts to have advance care directives. Individuals aged 19-24 years (6.6%, aOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.7) and 25-30 years (7.6%, aOR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8), compared to 31-38 years (14.3%), and non-Hispanic blacks (2.5%), compared to non-Hispanic whites (9.5%, aOR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.6), were less likely to have advance care directives. Few young adults with CHD had advance care directives. Disparities in advance care planning may exist.

Disability Among Young Adults With Congenital Heart Defects: Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and Well-Being 2016-2019

Background

Disabilities have implications for health, well‐being, and health care, yet limited information is available on the percentage of adults with congenital heart defects (CHD) living with disabilities. We evaluated the prevalence of disability and associated characteristics among the 2016–2019 CH STRONG (Congenital Heart Survey to Recognize Outcomes, Needs, and Well‐Being) population‐based sample of 19‐ to 38‐year‐olds with CHD from 3 US locations.

Methods and Results

Prevalence of disability types (hearing, vision, cognition, mobility, self‐care, living independently) were compared with similarly aged adults from the general population as estimated by the American Community Survey and standardized to the CH STRONG eligible population to reduce nonresponse bias and confounding. Health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured via Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scale T‐scores standardized to US 18‐ to 34‐year‐olds. Separate multivariable regression models assessed associations between disability and HRQOL. Of 1478 participants, 40% reported disabilities, with cognition most prevalent (29%). Of those reporting disability, 45% ever received disability benefits and 46% were unemployed. Prevalence of disability types were 5 to 8 times higher in adults with CHD than the general population. Those with ≥1 disability had greater odds of being female, and of having non‐Hispanic Black maternal race and ethnicity, severe CHD, recent cardiac care, and noncardiac congenital anomalies. On average, adults with CHD and cognition, mobility, and self‐care disabilities had impaired mental HRQOL and those with any disability type had impaired physical HRQOL.

Conclusions

Two of 5 adults with CHD may have disabilities, which are associated with impaired HRQOL. These results may inform healthcare needs and services for this growing population.

Improving Longitudinal Outcomes, Efficiency, and Equity in the Care of Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal follow-up, resource utilization, and health disparities are top congenital heart research and care priorities. Medicaid claims include longitudinal data on inpatient, outpatient, emergency, pharmacy, rehabilitation, home health utilization, and social determinants of health-including mother-infant pairs.

OBJECTIVES

The New York Congenital Heart Surgeons Collaborative for Longitudinal Outcomes and Utilization of Resources linked robust clinical details from locally held state and national registries from 10 of 11 New York congenital heart centers to Medicaid claims, building a novel, statewide mechanism for longitudinal assessment of outcomes, expenditures, and health inequities.

METHODS

The authors included all children <18 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database or the New York State Pediatric Congenital Cardiac Surgery Registry from 10 of 11 New York centers, 2006 to 2019. Data were linked via iterative, ranked deterministic matching on direct identifiers. Match rates were calculated and compared. Proportions of the linked cohort trackable over 3, 5, and 10 years were described.

RESULTS

Of 14,097 registry cases, 59% (n = 8,322) reported Medicaid use. Of these, 7,414 were linked to New York claims, at an 89% match rate. Of matched cases, the authors tracked 79%, 74%, and 65% of children over 3, 5, and 10 years when requiring near-continuous Medicaid enrollment. Allowing more lenient enrollment criteria, the authors tracked 86%, 82%, and 76%, respectively. Mortality over this time was 7.7%, 8.4%, and 10.0%, respectively. Manual validation revealed ∼100% true matches.

CONCLUSIONS

This establishes a novel statewide data resource for assessment of longitudinal outcome, health expenditure, and disparities for children with congenital heart disease.