1
|
Forer L, Taliun D, LeFaive J, Smith AV, Boughton A, Coassin S, Lamina C, Kronenberg F, Fuchsberger C, Schönherr S. Imputation Server PGS: an automated approach to calculate polygenic risk scores on imputation servers. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W70-W77. [PMID: 38709879 PMCID: PMC11223871 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Polygenic scores (PGS) enable the prediction of genetic predisposition for a wide range of traits and diseases by calculating the weighted sum of allele dosages for genetic variants associated with the trait or disease in question. Present approaches for calculating PGS from genotypes are often inefficient and labor-intensive, limiting transferability into clinical applications. Here, we present 'Imputation Server PGS', an extension of the Michigan Imputation Server designed to automate a standardized calculation of polygenic scores based on imputed genotypes. This extends the widely used Michigan Imputation Server with new functionality, bringing the simplicity and efficiency of modern imputation to the PGS field. The service currently supports over 4489 published polygenic scores from publicly available repositories and provides extensive quality control, including ancestry estimation to report population stratification. An interactive report empowers users to screen and compare thousands of scores in a fast and intuitive way. Imputation Server PGS provides a user-friendly web service, facilitating the application of polygenic scores to a wide range of genetic studies and is freely available at https://imputationserver.sph.umich.edu.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Forer
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniel Taliun
- Canada Excellence Research Chair in Genomic Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jonathon LeFaive
- Department of Biostatistics and the Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Albert V Smith
- Department of Biostatistics and the Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Andrew P Boughton
- Department of Biostatistics and the Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Stefan Coassin
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claudia Lamina
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Florian Kronenberg
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian Fuchsberger
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Biostatistics and the Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Sebastian Schönherr
- Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salvatore M, Kundu R, Shi X, Friese CR, Lee S, Fritsche LG, Mondul AM, Hanauer D, Pearce CL, Mukherjee B. To weight or not to weight? The effect of selection bias in 3 large electronic health record-linked biobanks and recommendations for practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31:1479-1492. [PMID: 38742457 PMCID: PMC11187425 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop recommendations regarding the use of weights to reduce selection bias for commonly performed analyses using electronic health record (EHR)-linked biobank data. MATERIALS AND METHODS We mapped diagnosis (ICD code) data to standardized phecodes from 3 EHR-linked biobanks with varying recruitment strategies: All of Us (AOU; n = 244 071), Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI; n = 81 243), and UK Biobank (UKB; n = 401 167). Using 2019 National Health Interview Survey data, we constructed selection weights for AOU and MGI to represent the US adult population more. We used weights previously developed for UKB to represent the UKB-eligible population. We conducted 4 common analyses comparing unweighted and weighted results. RESULTS For AOU and MGI, estimated phecode prevalences decreased after weighting (weighted-unweighted median phecode prevalence ratio [MPR]: 0.82 and 0.61), while UKB estimates increased (MPR: 1.06). Weighting minimally impacted latent phenome dimensionality estimation. Comparing weighted versus unweighted phenome-wide association study for colorectal cancer, the strongest associations remained unaltered, with considerable overlap in significant hits. Weighting affected the estimated log-odds ratio for sex and colorectal cancer to align more closely with national registry-based estimates. DISCUSSION Weighting had a limited impact on dimensionality estimation and large-scale hypothesis testing but impacted prevalence and association estimation. When interested in estimating effect size, specific signals from untargeted association analyses should be followed up by weighted analysis. CONCLUSION EHR-linked biobanks should report recruitment and selection mechanisms and provide selection weights with defined target populations. Researchers should consider their intended estimands, specify source and target populations, and weight EHR-linked biobank analyses accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell Salvatore
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| | - Ritoban Kundu
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| | - Xu Shi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| | - Christopher R Friese
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Center for Improving Patient and Population Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| | - Seunggeun Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Graduate School of Data Science, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Lars G Fritsche
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| | - Alison M Mondul
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| | - David Hanauer
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2054, United States
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| | - Bhramar Mukherjee
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herrera-Rivero M, Adli M, Akiyama K, Akula N, Amare AT, Ardau R, Arias B, Aubry JM, Backlund L, Bellivier F, Benabarre A, Bengesser S, Bhattacharjee AK, Biernacka JM, Birner A, Cearns M, Cervantes P, Chen HC, Chillotti C, Cichon S, Clark SR, Colom F, Cruceanu C, Czerski PM, Dalkner N, Degenhardt F, Del Zompo M, DePaulo JR, Etain B, Falkai P, Ferensztajn-Rochowiak E, Forstner AJ, Frank J, Frisén L, Frye MA, Fullerton JM, Gallo C, Gard S, Garnham JS, Goes FS, Grigoroiu-Serbanescu M, Grof P, Hashimoto R, Hasler R, Hauser J, Heilbronner U, Herms S, Hoffmann P, Hou L, Hsu YH, Jamain S, Jiménez E, Kahn JP, Kassem L, Kato T, Kelsoe J, Kittel-Schneider S, Kuo PH, Kusumi I, König B, Laje G, Landén M, Lavebratt C, Leboyer M, Leckband SG, Maj M, Manchia M, Marie-Claire C, Martinsson L, McCarthy MJ, McElroy SL, Millischer V, Mitjans M, Mondimore FM, Monteleone P, Nievergelt CM, Novák T, Nöthen MM, O'Donovan C, Ozaki N, Papiol S, Pfennig A, Pisanu C, Potash JB, Reif A, Reininghaus E, Richard-Lepouriel H, Roberts G, Rouleau GA, Rybakowski JK, Schalling M, Schofield PR, Schubert KO, Schulte EC, Schweizer BW, Severino G, Shekhtman T, Shilling PD, Shimoda K, Simhandl C, Slaney CM, Squassina A, Stamm T, Stopkova P, Streit F, Tekola-Ayele F, Thalamuthu A, Tortorella A, Turecki G, Veeh J, Vieta E, Viswanath B, Witt SH, Zandi PP, Alda M, Bauer M, McMahon FJ, Mitchell PB, Rietschel M, Schulze TG, Baune BT. Exploring the genetics of lithium response in bipolar disorders. Int J Bipolar Disord 2024; 12:20. [PMID: 38865039 PMCID: PMC11169116 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-024-00341-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lithium (Li) remains the treatment of choice for bipolar disorders (BP). Its mood-stabilizing effects help reduce the long-term burden of mania, depression and suicide risk in patients with BP. It also has been shown to have beneficial effects on disease-associated conditions, including sleep and cardiovascular disorders. However, the individual responses to Li treatment vary within and between diagnostic subtypes of BP (e.g. BP-I and BP-II) according to the clinical presentation. Moreover, long-term Li treatment has been linked to adverse side-effects that are a cause of concern and non-adherence, including the risk of developing chronic medical conditions such as thyroid and renal disease. In recent years, studies by the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) have uncovered a number of genetic factors that contribute to the variability in Li treatment response in patients with BP. Here, we leveraged the ConLiGen cohort (N = 2064) to investigate the genetic basis of Li effects in BP. For this, we studied how Li response and linked genes associate with the psychiatric symptoms and polygenic load for medical comorbidities, placing particular emphasis on identifying differences between BP-I and BP-II. RESULTS We found that clinical response to Li treatment, measured with the Alda scale, was associated with a diminished burden of mania, depression, substance and alcohol abuse, psychosis and suicidal ideation in patients with BP-I and, in patients with BP-II, of depression only. Our genetic analyses showed that a stronger clinical response to Li was modestly related to lower polygenic load for diabetes and hypertension in BP-I but not BP-II. Moreover, our results suggested that a number of genes that have been previously linked to Li response variability in BP differentially relate to the psychiatric symptomatology, particularly to the numbers of manic and depressive episodes, and to the polygenic load for comorbid conditions, including diabetes, hypertension and hypothyroidism. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, our findings suggest that the effects of Li on symptomatology and comorbidity in BP are partially modulated by common genetic factors, with differential effects between BP-I and BP-II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisol Herrera-Rivero
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster and Joint Institute for Individualisation in a Changing Environment (JICE), University of Münster and Bielefeld University, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A9, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Mazda Adli
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
- Fliedner Klinik Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kazufumi Akiyama
- Department of Biological Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan
| | - Nirmala Akula
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services, Baltimore, USA
| | - Azmeraw T Amare
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Raffaella Ardau
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital University Agency of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Bárbara Arias
- Unitat de Zoologia i Antropologia Biològica (Dpt. Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals), Facultat de Biologia and Institut de Biomedicina (IBUB), University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean-Michel Aubry
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatric Specialities, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lena Backlund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Center for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frank Bellivier
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, INSERM UMR-S 1144, Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, F. Widal, Paris, France
| | - Antonio Benabarre
- Bipolar Disorder Program, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susanne Bengesser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Research Unit for Bipolar Affective Disorder, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Joanna M Biernacka
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Armin Birner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Research Unit for Bipolar Affective Disorder, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Micah Cearns
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Pablo Cervantes
- The Neuromodulation Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Hsi-Chung Chen
- Department of Psychiatry & Center of Sleep Disorders, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Caterina Chillotti
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital University Agency of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Sven Cichon
- Human Genomics Research Group, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Scott R Clark
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Francesc Colom
- Mental Health Research Group, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristiana Cruceanu
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Piotr M Czerski
- Psychiatric Genetic Unit, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Nina Dalkner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Research Unit for Bipolar Affective Disorder, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Franziska Degenhardt
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria Del Zompo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J Raymond DePaulo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Bruno Etain
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, INSERM UMR-S 1144, Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, F. Widal, Paris, France
| | - Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Andreas J Forstner
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Josef Frank
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Louise Frisén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark A Frye
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Janice M Fullerton
- Neuroscience Research, Australia and School of Biomedical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carla Gallo
- Laboratorios de Investigación y Desarrollo, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, San Martín de Porres, Peru
| | - Sébastien Gard
- Service de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julie S Garnham
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Fernando S Goes
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Maria Grigoroiu-Serbanescu
- Biometric Psychiatric Genetics Research Unit, Alexandru Obregia Clinical Psychiatric Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paul Grof
- Mood Disorders Center of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ryota Hashimoto
- Department of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Roland Hasler
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatric Specialities, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Hauser
- Psychiatric Genetic Unit, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Urs Heilbronner
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Herms
- Human Genomics Research Group, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Per Hoffmann
- Human Genomics Research Group, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Liping Hou
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services, Baltimore, USA
| | - Yi-Hsiang Hsu
- Program for Quantitative Genomics, Harvard School of Public Health and HSL Institute for Aging Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Stephane Jamain
- Univ. Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Translational Neuropsychiatry, Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France
| | - Esther Jiménez
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean-Pierre Kahn
- Service de Psychiatrie et Psychologie Clinique, Centre Psychothérapique de Nancy - Université, Nancy, France
| | - Layla Kassem
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services, Baltimore, USA
| | - Tadafumi Kato
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - John Kelsoe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Sarah Kittel-Schneider
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Po-Hsiu Kuo
- Department of Public Health & Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ichiro Kusumi
- Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Barbara König
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Landesklinikum Neunkirchen, Neunkirchen, Austria
| | - Gonzalo Laje
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services, Baltimore, USA
| | - Mikael Landén
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Catharina Lavebratt
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Center for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marion Leboyer
- Univ. Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Translational Neuropsychiatry, AP-HP, Mondor University Hospital, DMU Impact, Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France
| | - Susan G Leckband
- Office of Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, California, USA
| | - Mario Maj
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Caserta, Italy
| | - Mirko Manchia
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
- Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Cynthia Marie-Claire
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm UMR-S 1144, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie, 75006, Paris, France
| | - Lina Martinsson
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael J McCarthy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Susan L McElroy
- Department of Psychiatry, Lindner Center of Hope/University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Vincent Millischer
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Center for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marina Mitjans
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, Faculty of Biology, Institut de Biomedicina de La Universitat de Barcelona (IBUB), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francis M Mondimore
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Palmiero Monteleone
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry 'Scuola Medica Salernitana', University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy
| | | | - Tomas Novák
- National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
| | - Markus M Nöthen
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Norio Ozaki
- Department of Psychiatry & Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Sergi Papiol
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Pfennig
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Claudia Pisanu
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - James B Potash
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Andreas Reif
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eva Reininghaus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Research Unit for Bipolar Affective Disorder, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Hélène Richard-Lepouriel
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatric Specialities, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gloria Roberts
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Guy A Rouleau
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Janusz K Rybakowski
- Department of Adult Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Martin Schalling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Center for Molecular Medicine at Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter R Schofield
- Neuroscience Research, Australia and School of Biomedical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Klaus Oliver Schubert
- Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Mental Health Services, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Eva C Schulte
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Barbara W Schweizer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Giovanni Severino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Tatyana Shekhtman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Paul D Shilling
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Katzutaka Shimoda
- Department of Psychiatry, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan
| | - Christian Simhandl
- Medical Faculty, Bipolar Center Wiener Neustadt, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claire M Slaney
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Alessio Squassina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Thomas Stamm
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pavla Stopkova
- National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
| | - Fabian Streit
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fasil Tekola-Ayele
- Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Anbupalam Thalamuthu
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Gustavo Turecki
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Julia Veeh
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Biju Viswanath
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, 560029, India
| | - Stephanie H Witt
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter P Zandi
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Martin Alda
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Michael Bauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Francis J McMahon
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services, Baltimore, USA
| | - Philip B Mitchell
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marcella Rietschel
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas G Schulze
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Norton College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Bernhard T Baune
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster and Joint Institute for Individualisation in a Changing Environment (JICE), University of Münster and Bielefeld University, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A9, 48149, Münster, Germany.
- Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne and The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jung H, Jung HU, Baek EJ, Kwon SY, Kang JO, Lim JE, Oh B. Integration of risk factor polygenic risk score with disease polygenic risk score for disease prediction. Commun Biol 2024; 7:180. [PMID: 38351177 PMCID: PMC10864389 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-05874-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk score (PRS) is useful for capturing an individual's genetic susceptibility. However, previous studies have not fully exploited the potential of the risk factor PRS (RFPRS) for disease prediction. We explored the potential of integrating disease-related RFPRSs with disease PRS to enhance disease prediction performance. We constructed 112 RFPRSs and analyzed the association of RFPRSs with diseases to identify disease-related RFPRSs in 700 diseases, using the UK Biobank dataset. We uncovered 6157 statistically significant associations between 247 diseases and 109 RFPRSs. We estimated the disease PRSs of 70 diseases that exhibited statistically significant heritability, to generate RFDiseasemetaPRS-a combined PRS integrating RFPRSs and disease PRS-and compare the prediction performance metrics between RFDiseasemetaPRS and disease PRS. RFDiseasemetaPRS showed better performance for Nagelkerke's pseudo-R2, odds ratio (OR) per 1 SD, net reclassification improvement (NRI) values and difference of R2 considered by variance of R2 in 31 out of 70 diseases. Additionally, we assessed risk classification between two models by examining OR between the top 10% and remaining 90% individuals for the 31 diseases; RFDiseasemetaPRS exhibited better R2, NRI and OR than disease PRS. These findings highlight the importance of utilizing RFDiseasemetaPRS, which can provide personalized healthcare and tailored prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyein Jung
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae-Un Jung
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Shin Young Kwon
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-One Kang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Eun Lim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Bermseok Oh
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Mendel Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salvatore M, Kundu R, Shi X, Friese CR, Lee S, Fritsche LG, Mondul AM, Hanauer D, Pearce CL, Mukherjee B. To weight or not to weight? Studying the effect of selection bias in three large EHR-linked biobanks. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.12.24302710. [PMID: 38405832 PMCID: PMC10888982 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.12.24302710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective To explore the role of selection bias adjustment by weighting electronic health record (EHR)-linked biobank data for commonly performed analyses. Materials and methods We mapped diagnosis (ICD code) data to standardized phecodes from three EHR-linked biobanks with varying recruitment strategies: All of Us (AOU; n=244,071), Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI; n=81,243), and UK Biobank (UKB; n=401,167). Using 2019 National Health Interview Survey data, we constructed selection weights for AOU and MGI to be more representative of the US adult population. We used weights previously developed for UKB to represent the UKB-eligible population. We conducted four common descriptive and analytic tasks comparing unweighted and weighted results. Results For AOU and MGI, estimated phecode prevalences decreased after weighting (weighted-unweighted median phecode prevalence ratio [MPR]: 0.82 and 0.61), while UKB's estimates increased (MPR: 1.06). Weighting minimally impacted latent phenome dimensionality estimation. Comparing weighted versus unweighted PheWAS for colorectal cancer, the strongest associations remained unaltered and there was large overlap in significant hits. Weighting affected the estimated log-odds ratio for sex and colorectal cancer to align more closely with national registry-based estimates. Discussion Weighting had limited impact on dimensionality estimation and large-scale hypothesis testing but impacted prevalence and association estimation more. Results from untargeted association analyses should be followed by weighted analysis when effect size estimation is of interest for specific signals. Conclusion EHR-linked biobanks should report recruitment and selection mechanisms and provide selection weights with defined target populations. Researchers should consider their intended estimands, specify source and target populations, and weight EHR-linked biobank analyses accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell Salvatore
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ritoban Kundu
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Xu Shi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christopher R Friese
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Improving Patient and Population Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Seunggeun Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Graduate School of Data Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Lars G Fritsche
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alison M Mondul
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David Hanauer
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bhramar Mukherjee
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brīvība M, Atava I, Pečulis R, Elbere I, Ansone L, Rozenberga M, Silamiķelis I, Kloviņš J. Evaluating the Efficacy of Type 2 Diabetes Polygenic Risk Scores in an Independent European Population. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:1151. [PMID: 38256224 PMCID: PMC10817091 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25021151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Numerous type 2 diabetes (T2D) polygenic risk scores (PGSs) have been developed to predict individuals' predisposition to the disease. An independent assessment and verification of the best-performing PGS are warranted to allow for a rapid application of developed models. To date, only 3% of T2D PGSs have been evaluated. In this study, we assessed all (n = 102) presently published T2D PGSs in an independent cohort of 3718 individuals, which has not been included in the construction or fine-tuning of any T2D PGS so far. We further chose the best-performing PGS, assessed its performance across major population principal component analysis (PCA) clusters, and compared it with newly developed population-specific T2D PGS. Our findings revealed that 88% of the published PGSs were significantly associated with T2D; however, their performance was lower than what had been previously reported. We found a positive association of PGS improvement over the years (p-value = 8.01 × 10-4 with PGS002771 currently showing the best discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) = 0.669) and PGS003443 exhibiting the strongest association PGS003443 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.899). Further investigation revealed no difference in PGS performance across major population PCA clusters and when compared with newly developed population-specific PGS. Our findings revealed a positive trend in T2D PGS performance, consistently identifying high-T2D-risk individuals in an independent European population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monta Brīvība
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia; (I.A.); (I.E.); (L.A.); (J.K.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Billings LK, Shi Z, Wei J, Rifkin AS, Zheng SL, Helfand BT, Ilbawi N, Dunnenberger HM, Hulick PJ, Qamar A, Xu J. Utility of Polygenic Scores for Differentiating Diabetes Diagnosis Among Patients With Atypical Phenotypes of Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 109:107-113. [PMID: 37560999 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Misclassification of diabetes type occurs in people with atypical presentations of type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although current clinical guidelines suggest clinical variables and treatment response as ways to help differentiate diabetes type, they remain insufficient for people with atypical presentations. OBJECTIVE This work aimed to assess the clinical utility of 2 polygenic scores (PGSs) in differentiating between T1D and T2D. METHODS Patients diagnosed with diabetes in the UK Biobank were studied (N = 41 787), including 464 (1%) and 15 923 (38%) who met the criteria for classic T1D and T2D, respectively, and 25 400 (61%) atypical diabetes. The validity of 2 published PGSs for T1D (PGST1D) and T2D (PGST2D) in differentiating classic T1D or T2D was assessed using C statistic. The utility of genetic probability for T1D based on PGSs (GenProb-T1D) was evaluated in atypical diabetes patients. RESULTS The joint performance of PGST1D and PGST2D for differentiating classic T1D or T2D was outstanding (C statistic = 0.91), significantly higher than that of PGST1D alone (0.88) and PGST2D alone (0.70), both P less than .001. Using an optimal cutoff of GenProb-T1D, 23% of patients with atypical diabetes had a higher probability of T1D and its validity was independently supported by clinical presentations that are characteristic of T1D. CONCLUSION PGST1D and PGST2D can be used to discriminate classic T1D and T2D and have potential clinical utility for differentiating these 2 types of diseases among patients with atypical diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana K Billings
- Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Zhuqing Shi
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Jun Wei
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Andrew S Rifkin
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - S Lilly Zheng
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Brian T Helfand
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Nadim Ilbawi
- Department of Family Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Henry M Dunnenberger
- Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Peter J Hulick
- Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Arman Qamar
- Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Herrera-Rivero M, Adli M, Akiyama K, Akula N, Amare AT, Ardau R, Arias B, Aubry JM, Backlund L, Bellivier F, Benabarre A, Bengesser S, Bhattacharjee AK, Biernacka JM, Birner A, Cearns M, Cervantes P, Chen HC, Chillotti C, Cichon S, Clark SR, Colom F, Cruceanu C, Czerski PM, Dalkner N, Degenhardt F, Del Zompo M, DePaulo JR, Etain B, Falkai P, Ferensztajn-Rochowiak E, Forstner AJ, Frank J, Frisén L, Frye MA, Fullerton JM, Gallo C, Gard S, Garnham JS, Goes FS, Grigoroiu-Serbanescu M, Grof P, Hashimoto R, Hasler R, Hauser J, Heilbronner U, Herms S, Hoffmann P, Hou L, Hsu YH, Jamain S, Jiménez E, Kahn JP, Kassem L, Kato T, Kelsoe J, Kittel-Schneider S, Kuo PH, Kusumi I, König B, Laje G, Landén M, Lavebratt C, Leboyer M, Leckband SG, Maj M, Manchia M, Marie-Claire C, Martinsson L, McCarthy MJ, McElroy SL, Millischer V, Mitjans M, Mondimore FM, Monteleone P, Nievergelt CM, Novák T, Nöthen MM, O'Donovan C, Ozaki N, Papiol S, Pfennig A, Pisanu C, Potash JB, Reif A, Reininghaus E, Richard-Lepouriel H, Roberts G, Rouleau GA, Rybakowski JK, Schalling M, Schofield PR, Schubert KO, Schulte EC, Schweizer BW, Severino G, Shekhtman T, Shilling PD, Shimoda K, Simhandl C, Slaney CM, Squassina A, Stamm T, Stopkova P, Streit F, Tekola-Ayele F, Thalamuthu A, Tortorella A, Turecki G, Veeh J, Vieta E, Viswanath B, Witt SH, Zandi PP, Alda M, Bauer M, McMahon FJ, Mitchell PB, Rietschel M, Schulze TG, Baune BT. Exploring the genetics of lithium response in bipolar disorders. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3677630. [PMID: 38077040 PMCID: PMC10705597 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3677630/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Lithium (Li) remains the treatment of choice for bipolar disorders (BP). Its mood-stabilizing effects help reduce the long-term burden of mania, depression and suicide risk in patients with BP. It also has been shown to have beneficial effects on disease-associated conditions, including sleep and cardiovascular disorders. However, the individual responses to Li treatment vary within and between diagnostic subtypes of BP (e.g. BP-I and BP-II) according to the clinical presentation. Moreover, long-term Li treatment has been linked to adverse side-effects that are a cause of concern and non-adherence, including the risk of developing chronic medical conditions such as thyroid and renal disease. In recent years, studies by the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) have uncovered a number of genetic factors that contribute to the variability in Li treatment response in patients with BP. Here, we leveraged the ConLiGen cohort (N=2,064) to investigate the genetic basis of Li effects in BP. For this, we studied how Li response and linked genes associate with the psychiatric symptoms and polygenic load for medical comorbidities, placing particular emphasis on identifying differences between BP-I and BP-II. Results We found that clinical response to Li treatment, measured with the Alda scale, was associated with a diminished burden of mania, depression, substance and alcohol abuse, psychosis and suicidal ideation in patients with BP-I and, in patients with BP-II, of depression only. Our genetic analyses showed that a stronger clinical response to Li was modestly related to lower polygenic load for diabetes and hypertension in BP-I but not BP-II. Moreover, our results suggested that a number of genes that have been previously linked to Li response variability in BP differentially relate to the psychiatric symptomatology, particularly to the numbers of manic and depressive episodes, and to the polygenic load for comorbid conditions, including diabetes, hypertension and hypothyroidism. Conclusions Taken together, our findings suggest that the effects of Li on symptomatology and comorbidity in BP are partially modulated by common genetic factors, with differential effects between BP-I and BP-II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nirmala Akula
- United States Department of Health and Human Services
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Josef Frank
- Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Liping Hou
- United States Department of Health and Human Services
| | | | | | | | | | - Layla Kassem
- United States Department of Health and Human Services
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gonzalo Laje
- United States Department of Health and Human Services
| | | | | | | | | | - Mario Maj
- University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrea Pfennig
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fabian Streit
- Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Vieta
- Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael Bauer
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fritsche LG, Nam K, Du J, Kundu R, Salvatore M, Shi X, Lee S, Burgess S, Mukherjee B. Uncovering associations between pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 Severity: A polygenic risk score approach across three large biobanks. PLoS Genet 2023; 19:e1010907. [PMID: 38113267 PMCID: PMC10763941 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To overcome the limitations associated with the collection and curation of COVID-19 outcome data in biobanks, this study proposes the use of polygenic risk scores (PRS) as reliable proxies of COVID-19 severity across three large biobanks: the Michigan Genomics Initiative (MGI), UK Biobank (UKB), and NIH All of Us. The goal is to identify associations between pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 severity. METHODS Drawing on a sample of more than 500,000 individuals from the three biobanks, we conducted a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) to identify associations between a PRS for COVID-19 severity, derived from a genome-wide association study on COVID-19 hospitalization, and clinical pre-existing, pre-pandemic phenotypes. We performed cohort-specific PRS PheWAS and a subsequent fixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS The current study uncovered 23 pre-existing conditions significantly associated with the COVID-19 severity PRS in cohort-specific analyses, of which 21 were observed in the UKB cohort and two in the MGI cohort. The meta-analysis yielded 27 significant phenotypes predominantly related to obesity, metabolic disorders, and cardiovascular conditions. After adjusting for body mass index, several clinical phenotypes, such as hypercholesterolemia and gastrointestinal disorders, remained associated with an increased risk of hospitalization following COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION By employing PRS as a proxy for COVID-19 severity, we corroborated known risk factors and identified novel associations between pre-existing clinical phenotypes and COVID-19 severity. Our study highlights the potential value of using PRS when actual outcome data may be limited or inadequate for robust analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars G. Fritsche
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Kisung Nam
- Graduate School of Data Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jiacong Du
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Ritoban Kundu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Maxwell Salvatore
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Xu Shi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Seunggeun Lee
- Graduate School of Data Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephen Burgess
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Bhramar Mukherjee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Center for Precision Health Data Science, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Michigan Institute for Data Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tang D, Freudenberg J, Dahl A. Factorizing polygenic epistasis improves prediction and uncovers biological pathways in complex traits. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1875-1887. [PMID: 37922884 PMCID: PMC10645564 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Epistasis is central in many domains of biology, but it has not yet been proven useful for understanding the etiology of complex traits. This is partly because complex-trait epistasis involves polygenic interactions that are poorly captured in current models. To address this gap, we developed a model called Epistasis Factor Analysis (EFA). EFA assumes that polygenic epistasis can be factorized into interactions between a few epistasis factors (EFs), which represent latent polygenic components of the observed complex trait. The statistical goals of EFA are to improve polygenic prediction and to increase power to detect epistasis, while the biological goal is to unravel genetic effects into more-homogeneous units. We mathematically characterize EFA and use simulations to show that EFA outperforms current epistasis models when its assumptions approximately hold. Applied to predicting yeast growth rates, EFA outperforms the additive model for several traits with large epistasis heritability and uniformly outperforms the standard epistasis model. We replicate these prediction improvements in a second dataset. We then apply EFA to four previously characterized traits in the UK Biobank and find statistically significant epistasis in all four, including two that are robust to scale transformation. Moreover, we find that the inferred EFs partly recover pre-defined biological pathways for two of the traits. Our results demonstrate that more realistic models can identify biologically and statistically meaningful epistasis in complex traits, indicating that epistasis has potential for precision medicine and characterizing the biology underlying GWAS results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Tang
- Section of Genetic Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Genomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jerome Freudenberg
- Section of Genetic Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andy Dahl
- Section of Genetic Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen S, Xin J, Ding Z, Zhao L, Ben S, Zheng R, Li S, Li H, Shao W, Cheng Y, Zhang Z, Du M, Wang M. Construction, evaluation, and AOP framework-based application of the EpPRS as a genetic surrogate for assessing environmental pollutants. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 180:108202. [PMID: 37734146 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental pollutant measurement is essential for accurate health risk assessment. However, the detection of humans' internal exposure to pollutants is cost-intensive and consumes time and energy. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been widely applied in genetic studies of complex trait diseases. It is important to construct a genetically relevant environmental surrogate for pollutant exposure and to explore its utility for disease prediction and risk assessment. OBJECTIVES This study enrolled 714 individuals with complete genomic data and exposomic data on 22 plasma-persistent organic pollutants (POPs). METHODS We first conducted 22 POP genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and constructed the corresponding environmental pollutant-based PRS (EpPRS) by clumping and P value thresholding (C + T), lassosum, and PRS-CS methods. The best-fit EpPRS was chosen by its regression R2. An adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was developed to assess the effects of contaminants on candidate diseases. Furthermore, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed to explore the causal association between POPs and cancer risk. RESULTS The C + T method produced the best-performing EpPRSs for 7 PCBs and 4 PBDEs. EpPRSs replicated the correlations of environmental exposure measurements based on consistent patterns. The diagnostic performance of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) PRS was improved by the combined model of T2DM-EpPRS of PCB126/BDE153. Finally, the AKT1-mediated AOP framework illustrated that PCB126 and BDE153 may increase the risk of T2DM by decreasing AKT1 phosphorylation through the cGMP-PKG pathway and promoting abnormal glucose homeostasis. MR analysis showed that digestive system tumors, such as colorectal cancer and biliary tract cancer, are more sensitive to POP exposure. CONCLUSIONS EpPRSs can serve as a proxy for assessing pollutant internal exposure. The application of the EpPRS to disease risk assessment can reveal the toxic pathway and mode of action linking exposure and disease in detail, providing a basis for the development of environmental pollutant control strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silu Chen
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Junyi Xin
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Bioinformatics, School of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhutao Ding
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lingyan Zhao
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shuai Ben
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Rui Zheng
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shuwei Li
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Huiqin Li
- Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wei Shao
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yifei Cheng
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhengdong Zhang
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Mulong Du
- Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Biostatistics, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Meilin Wang
- Department of Environmental Genomics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Genetic Toxicology, The Key Laboratory of Modern Toxicology of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|