Geographic and Demographic Variation in Use of Ranibizumab Versus Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration in the United States

Trends in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Original Medicare Part B Claims in the United States, 2014-2019

PURPOSE

To characterize trends in use of and expenditure for the intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab among the population enrolled in Original Medicare from 2014 to 2019.

METHODS

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to extract Medicare Part B fee-for-service outpatient injection claims data submitted by ophthalmologists. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between reimbursement, ophthalmologist availability, and agent administration rate.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2019, 17,588,995 intravitreal injection claims were filed by 4218 US ophthalmologists. Medicare costs for anti-VEGF injections increased from 2.51 B USD in 2014 to 4.02 B USD in 2019. Increased state-level ophthalmologist availability and incremental increases in average reimbursement amounts were found to be significantly associated with a 6.8-fold variation in 2019 overall anti-VEGF injection rates across states.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare injection rates and costs for anti-VEGF injections have both increased between 2014 and 2019, largely driven by increased aflibercept use. There is a significant association between ophthalmologist availability and anti-VEGF injection rate on the state level, suggesting access to care may contribute to the observed state-level disparities in intravitreal injection rates. Further characterization of factors contributing to the state-level variation in injection rates of individual anti-VEGF agents may help inform interventions promoting equitable access to and use of these drugs.

The impact of COVID-19 on aflibercept treatment of neovascular AMD in Sweden - data from the Swedish Macula Register

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to compare the real-world aflibercept treatment and visual outcomes, and to examine the adherence to pandemic guidelines in two groups of patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) before and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden up to the 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study including 2915 treatment naïve eyes with nAMD. Using data from the Swedish Macula Register (SMR), 1597 eyes initiating treatment between 1 July 2018 and 31 January 2019 (pre-pandemic group) were compared with 1318 eyes starting treatment between 1 February and 31 August 2020 (pandemic group). The eyes were then followed for 1 year ± 2 months, hence the first group was unaffected by the pandemic while the second group was affected. The focus was on baseline characteristics, visual acuity (VA) change from baseline, number of injections, treatment regimen, number of appointments and the frequency and length of appointment delays. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was used to compare baseline VA to follow-up VA within the respective groups. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The percentage of eyes with an available follow-up VA after 1 year was 58% in the pre-pandemic group vs. 44% in the pandemic group. VA in the pre-pandemic group had increased significantly after 1 year, from 62.2 ± 14.1 letters to 64.8 ± 16.1 letters (n = 921); p < 0.0001. In the pandemic group, VA increased from 61.1 ± 15.8 to 64.9 ± 16.9 (n = 575); p < 0.0001. There was no significant difference in mean VA change between the groups; p = 0.1734. The pre-pandemic group had significantly more delays than the pandemic group, 45% vs. 36%; p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

The pre-pandemic and pandemic groups had similar VA gains at 1-year follow-up, but with a reduced number of available VA in the pandemic group. Clinics were able to implement and prioritize injection visits excluding VA measurements, helping to reduce delays and maintain VA gains during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Medicare Part B Spending on Macular Degeneration Treatments Associated With Manufacturer Payments to Ophthalmologists

Importance

Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) therapies aflibercept and ranibizumab are among the highest-cost Medicare Part B drugs, even though off-label use of lower-cost bevacizumab is clinically noninferior. Payments from manufacturers of these ARMD therapies to ophthalmologists are hypothesized to be factors in ophthalmologists' therapeutic choice, controlling for ophthalmologist and patient characteristics.

Objective

To assess the association between manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists and choice of ARMD treatment as well as to identify ophthalmologist-level characteristics associated with prescribing lower-cost ARMD therapies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study of longitudinal (2013-2019) Medicare Part B data was conducted from December 2021 to December 2022. Ophthalmologists prescribing aflibercept (manufactured by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc), rabinizumab, or bevacizumab (both manufactured by Genentech Inc) for ARMD treatment of Medicare Part B beneficiaries were included. Data on manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists were obtained from the Open Payments database.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the percentage of bevacizumab prescribed by ophthalmologists among all ARMD therapies. Regression analysis assessed variation in bevacizumab prescribing by acceptance of manufacturer payments as well as by ophthalmologist and patient characteristics. Ophthalmologist characteristics were duration of practice and Medicare Administrative Contractor region, and patient characteristics were aggregated at the ophthalmologist level and included mean beneficiary age, percentage of dual-eligible beneficiaries, mean beneficiary risk score, and percentage of White beneficiaries. Savings were estimated by projecting the change in bevacizumab use had ophthalmologists not accepted manufacturer payments, controlling for all ophthalmologist and patient characteristics and comparing with observed use and costs.

Results

A total of 21 584 ophthalmologists (18 489 males [85.7%]) were included. Ophthalmologists who accepted manufacturer payments were significantly less likely to prescribe bevacizumab (28.0% [95% CI, 24.6%-42.5%] of patients) compared with those who did not accept manufacturer payments (45.8% [95% CI, 44.5%-47.1%]). Ophthalmologists who saw dual-eligible beneficiaries had greater bevacizumab prescribing (50.0% [95% CI, 40.6%-68.3%] in the highest quartile vs 36.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-38.8%] in the lowest quartile; β coefficient, 0.139; P < .001), while those who saw patients with higher mean beneficiary risk scores had lower bevacizumab use (38.0% [95% CI, 23.7%-44.1%] in the highest quartile vs 48.2% [95% CI, 45.5%-50.8%] in the lowest quartile; β coefficient, -0.102, P < .001). Had ophthalmologists who accepted manufacturer payments prescribed ARMD drugs as those who did not accept payments, Medicare spending on these treatments would have been $642 779 703.08 lower from 2013 to 2019, a 2.0% savings.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that drug manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists were associated with selection of higher-cost therapies for ARMD, which is a factor in increased Medicare and patient spending. Development of manufacturer payment models that encourage ophthalmologists to choose lower-cost therapies are needed.

Geographic and socioeconomic access disparities to Phase 3 clinical trials in ophthalmology in the United States

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

To identify geographic and socioeconomic variables associated with residential proximity to Phase 3 ophthalmology clinical trial sites.

METHODS

The geographic location of clinical trial sites for Phase 3 clinical trials in ophthalmology was identified using ClinicalTrials.gov. Driving time from each United States (US) census tract centroid to nearest clinical trial site was calculated using real traffic patterns. Travel data were crosslinked to census-tract level public datasets from United States Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS). Cross-sectional multivariable regression was used to identify associations between census-tract sociodemographic factors and driving time (>60 min) from each census tract centroid to the nearest clinical trial site.

RESULTS

There were 2330 unique clinical trial sites and 71,897 census tracts. Shortest median time was to retina sites [33.7 min (18.7, 70.1 min)]. Longest median time was to neuro-ophthalmology sites [119.8 min (48.7, 240.4 min)]. Driving >60 min was associated with rural tracts [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.60; 95% CI (5.66-10.20), p < 0.0001]; Midwest [aOR 1.84(1.15-2.96), p = 0.01], South [aOR 2.57 (1.38-4.79), p < 0.01], and West [aOR 2.52 (1.52-4.17), p < 0.001] v. Northeast; and tracts with higher visual impairment [aOR 1.07 (1.03-1.10), p < 0.001)]; higher poverty levels [4th v.1st Quartile of population below poverty, aOR 2.26 (1.72-2.98), p < 0.0001]; and lower education levels [high school v. Bachelor's degree or higher aOR 1.02 (1.00-1.03), p = 0.0072].

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant geographic and socioeconomic disparities in access to ophthalmology clinical trial sites for rural, non-Northeastern, poorer, and lower education level census tracts, and for census tracts with higher levels of self-reported visual impairment.

Controversies and Disparities in the Management of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration is a leading cause of blindness in patients aged 50 years and older. Prior to the 21^st century, there were no effective treatments for this devastating disease. However, the last 20 years have heralded the development of treatments for both the nonexudative and exudative forms. The invention of AREDS vitamin supplements and anti-VEGF therapies forever changed the treatment of dry and wet age-related macular degeneration, respectively. The rapid adoption and expansion of these vision preserving treatments has created controversy regarding their cost, burden of administration, development, and use of new technologies, genetic considerations, and observed societal disparities. Many of these controversies and disparities persist today and will require further research to resolve.

Geographic variation in the use of triptans and opioids for the acute treatment of migraine attacks

OBJECTIVE

To assess the geographic variations in triptan and opioid prescribing patterns for patients with migraine.

BACKGROUND

Numerous guidelines recommend triptans as the standard of care for migraine attacks, yet opioids are still widely used for migraine treatment. Variation in the use of opioids and triptans for the treatment of migraine by geographic location is not well known.

METHODS

Using a US claims database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with migraine between 2016 and 2018. We used a 12-month follow-up period to assess triptan and opioid utilization, stratified by the nine Census Bureau-designated divisions. To examine the geographic factors that affect triptan and opioid use among patients, we conducted two sets of multivariable analyses. First, we analyzed the odds of a patient being a triptan or opioid user in the follow-up period, defined as ≥1 triptan or opioid claim. We then analyzed the medication use rate among triptan or opioid users.

RESULTS

Overall, we had a final study population of 113,921 patients. In the follow-up period, 52.9% (60,247/113,921) [range: 48.0%-56.3%] of patients were triptan users and 41.0% (46,708/113,921) [range: 28.9%-48.4%] of patients were opioid users with significant differences across census divisions (p < 0.001). Triptan users had a mean (SD) of 4.8 (4.7) triptan claims annually with no significant differences across divisions (p = 0.188). Opioid users had a mean (SD) of 5.4 (6.8) opioid claims annually with significant differences across divisions (p < 0.001). The observed variation in opioid use stemmed from the proportion of patients using opioids in each region and not from the number of opioid prescriptions per user.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant geographic variation in the use of opioids and to a lesser degree the use of triptans. The widespread use of opioids and the large variation in use other than triptans as the standard of care suggest that improvements could be made in the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

Geographic Access Disparities of Clinical Trials in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the United States

To identify geographic and socioeconomic variables predictive of residential proximity to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) clinical trial locations.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Census tract-level data from public datasets and trial-level data from ClinicalTrials.gov were analyzed. We calculated the driving distance (>60 miles) and time (>60 minutes) from the population-weighted US census tract centroid to the nearest clinical trial site.

RESULTS

We identified 42 trials studying nAMD across 829 unique clinical trial sites in the United States. In a multivariable model, driving distance >60 miles had a significant association with rural location (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.86-7.96, P < .0001) and with Midwest (aOR 2.30; 95% CI 1.21-4.38, P = .01) and South (aOR 2.43; 95% CI 1.21-4.91, P = .01) as compared to the Northeast region, and with some college or an associate's degree, as compared to a bachelor's degree (aOR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = .0007, and aOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.10, P = .04, respectively). Lower odds of traveling >60 miles to the nearest nAMD trial site were associated with census tracts with a higher percentage of blacks (aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99, P < .0001), Hispanics (aOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P = .002), and Asians (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.88-0.93, P < .0001), as compared to whites, and with a lower percentage of the population <200% of the federal poverty level. Similar predictors were found in time traveled >60 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

There are geographic access disparities of clinical trial sites for nAMD in the United States.

A 5-Year Analysis of Physician-Industry Interactions, Physician Gender, and Anti-VEGF Use in US Ophthalmologists

Purpose: To explore physician gender, industry payments, and prescribing habits of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents.Methods: Retrospective review of U.S. ophthalmologists prescribing and receiving industry payments for aflibercept and/or ranibizumab (brand anti-VEGF injections) between August 2013 to December 2017.Results: Men receiving industry payments were older and had longer post-residency experience than women (both P < .001). Men were more likely to receive industry payments (P = .01), receive >5 payments (P = .003), and receive payments totaling >$1000 (P = .008). Men administered more injections on average than women when receiving >3 industry payments (P < .001) or when receiving >$100 (P < .01). On multivariate analysis, years in practice, male gender, number of payments, and total value of payments were independent factors associated with the number of brand injections administered (all P < .001).Conclusions: A positive association between industry payments and brand anti-VEGF use was identified, however, causality was not determined. Gender bias may be present in physician-industry relationships.

Use of Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Influence of CATT Results and Introduction of Aflibercept

PURPOSE

To assess whether publication of Comparison of Age-related macular degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT) results and introduction of aflibercept to the marketplace affected intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of treatment patterns.

METHODS

We calculated weekly bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization during 3 timeframes: (1) before CATT publication, (2) between CATT publication (April 28, 2011) and assignment of a unique aflibercept billing code (January 1, 2013), and (3) afterward for 164,188 Medicare beneficiaries with neovascular macular degeneration receiving ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection(s) from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014. We identified ophthalmologists who predominantly (≥80%) administered bevacizumab or ranibizumab and evaluated changes in preferences over the 3 periods. We replicated analyses on 881,381 commercially insured beneficiaries.

RESULTS

Among 317 ophthalmologists administering predominantly ranibizumab to Medicare beneficiaries pre-CATT, 221 (69.7%) reduced ranibizumab use post-CATT, whereas 96 (30.3%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time. Findings were reversed among 1041 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-CATT-777 (74.6%) continued bevacizumab-predominant use while 264 (25.4%) reduced bevacizumab use post-CATT. Among the 145 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered ranibizumab before aflibercept's availability, 77 (53.1%) reduced ranibizumab utilization and 68 (46.9%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time after aflibercept became available. Corresponding numbers among the 909 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-aflibercept were 381 (41.9%) reducing and 528 (58.1%) continuing bevacizumab-predominant use. Similar results were observed for commercially insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Many ophthalmologists who favored ranibizumab switched to bevacizumab after CATT publication, while most who favored bevacizumab before CATT publication continued favoring it afterward. Aflibercept's introduction had little impact on preferences for ranibizumab or bevacizumab.

Analysis of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection Claims Data in US Medicare Part B Beneficiaries From 2012 to 2015

Importance

The frequency of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections has grown exponentially with the introduction of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and most recently aflibercept. The cost associated with these medications has garnered significant national attention, warranting a granular analysis of their use.

Objective

To analyze trends in anti-VEGF injections for US Medicare Part B beneficiaries from 2012 to 2015.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This observational cohort study used 2012-2015 data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Part B Provider Utilization Files to analyze trends in intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF medications among Medicare Part B beneficiaries and their health care professionals.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome measure was distribution of and change over time in the number of anti-VEGF injections performed for ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab.

Results

A total of 2 574 124 intravitreal injections were performed by 3348 ophthalmologists in the outpatient setting for Medicare Part B beneficiaries during the 2015 calendar year; 100 ophthalmologists (3.0%) performed the highest volume of intravitreal injections. The total number of intravitreal injections administered in 2015 was 870 843 for aflibercept, 697 412 for ranibizumab, and 1 147 432 for bevacizumab. Ranibizumab injections decreased by 7.1% from 2012 to 2015 and bevacizumab injections decreased by 17.1%. From 2013 to 2015, aflibercept injections increased by 69.4%. The 100 ophthalmologists performing the highest volume of ranibizumab injections, as gauged by number of injections administered, accounted for 31.0% (95% CI, 30.994%-30.997%) of all ranibizumab injections nationally. The 100 ophthalmologists performing the highest volume of aflibercept injections accounted for 17.6% (95% CI, 17.638%-17.641%) of all aflibercept injections and the 100 ophthalmologists performing the highest volume of bevacizumab injections accounted for 19.6% (95% CI, 19.649%-19.653%) of all bevacizumab injections administered nationally to Medicare Part B beneficiaries. The highest number of injections per 1000 Medicare Part B beneficiaries occurred in Nebraska (aflibercept), Tennessee (ranibizumab), and South Dakota (bevacizumab).

Conclusions and Relevance

A total of 3.0% of ophthalmologists account for 17.6% to 31.0% of the total number of anti-VEGF injections administered nationally in the Medicare Part B population. Overall, bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections have decreased, coinciding with a 69.4% increase in aflibercept injections.

Determinants in Initial Treatment Choice for Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To assess how patient choices (out-of-pocket costs, insurance plan, geographic region) impact initiation of therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using administrative medical claims data from a large, national insurer.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients newly diagnosed with DME from 2013 through 2016 were observed for 90 days after diagnosis or until first treatment was received.

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression was used to create odds ratios comparing different baseline demographic and patient-related factors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the odds of receiving the different possible initial treatments for DME (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], focal laser treatment, steroids, or observation), no treatment, and not following up.

RESULTS

Of the 6220 newly diagnosed DME patients, 3010 (48.4%) underwent a follow-up examination within 90 days of diagnosis, and of those, 1453 patients (48.3%) received treatment in the observation window, including 614 (20.4%) with bevacizumab, 191 (6.3%) with ranibizumab or aflibercept, 560 (18.6%) with focal laser, 38 (1.3%) with steroid injection, and 50 (1.7%) with an injection of an unspecified drug. Having a copay (vs. $0) lowered the odds of receiving any treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.71; P < 0.001) and of receiving each treatment individually (anti-VEGF treatment: OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; bevacizumab: OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91; ranibizumab or aflibercept: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99; focal laser: OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.55; P < 0.001). Contrary to having a copay, having a high deductible and type of insurance plan were not associated with initiating treatment (P > 0.41 for all comparisons). Patients in the Northeast showed lower odds of initiating anti-VEGF treatment (OR = 0.60; 95%CI, 0.44-0.82; P < 0.001) and specifically bevacizumab (OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67; P < 0.001). Furthermore, Northeast patients who were treated with anti-VEGF showed a higher odds of receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept compared with bevacizumab (OR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.31-4.37; P < 0.001). Southern Midwest patients showed a higher odds of treatment (anti-VEGF: OR = 1.35; 95%CI, 1.02-1.77; P < 0.001; bevacizumab: OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87; focal laser: OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.89; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient choices such as copays and where they live are important factors in determining the initial choice of treatment for DME.