Safety of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Over 5 Years in 189 Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

Gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is among the most frequent inherited mitochondrial disease, causing a severe visual impairment, mostly in young-adult males. The causative mtDNA variants (the three common are m.11778 G>A/MT-ND4, m.3460 G>A/MT-ND1, and m.14484T>C/MT-ND6) by affecting complex I impair oxidative phosphorylation in retinal ganglion cells, ultimately leading to irreversible cell death and consequent functional loss. The gene therapy based on allotopic expression of a wild-type transgene carried by adeno-associated viral vectors (AVV-based) appears a promising approach in mitochondrial disease and its efficacy has been explored in several large clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

The review work employed basic concepts in mitochondrial diseases, LHON, and gene therapy procedures. Reports from completed trials in LHON (i.e. RESCUE) were reviewed and critically compared.

EXPERT OPINION

New challenges, as the improvement of the contralateral untreated eye or the apparently better outcome in patients treated in later stages (6-12 months), were highlighted by the latest gene therapy trials. A better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease together with combined therapy (medical and gene therapy) and optimization in genetic correction approaches could improve the visual outcome of treated eyes.

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy gene therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss relevant clinical outcomes, challenges, and future opportunities of gene therapy in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON).

RECENT FINDINGS

Results of G11778A LHON Phase 3 randomized clinical trials with unilateral intravitreal rAAV2/2-ND4 allotopic gene therapy show good safety and unexpected bilateral partial improvements of BCVA (best-corrected visual acuity) with mean logMAR BCVA improvements of up to near ∼0.3 logMAR (3 lines) in the treated eyes and ∼0.25 logMAR (2.5 lines) in the sham-treated or placebo-treated fellow eyes. Final mean BCVA levels after gene therapy were in the range of ∼1.3 logMAR (20/400) bilaterally.

SUMMARY

Bilateral partial improvement with unilateral LHON gene therapy was unanticipated and may be due to treatment efficacy, natural history, learning effect, and other mediators. The overall efficacy is limited given the final BCVA levels. The sequential progressive visual loss and varied occurrence of spontaneous partial improvement in LHON confound trial results. Future clinical trials with randomization of patients to a group not receiving gene therapy in either eye would help to assess treatment effect. Promising future LHON gene therapy strategies include mitochondrially-targeted-sequence adeno-associated virus ('MTS-AAV') for direct delivery of the wild-type mitochondrial DNA into the mitochondria and CRISPR-free, RNA-free mitochondrial base editing systems. Signs of anatomical optic nerve damage and objective retinal ganglion cell dysfunction are evident in the asymptomatic eyes of LHON patients experiencing unilateral visual loss, indicating the therapeutic window is narrowing before onset of visual symptoms. Future treatment strategies utilizing mitochondrial base editing in LHON carriers without optic neuropathy holds the promise of a more advantageous approach to achieve optimal visual outcome by reducing disease penetrance and mitigating retinal ganglion cell loss when optic neuropathy develops.

Development of mitochondrial gene-editing strategies and their potential applications in mitochondrial hereditary diseases: a review

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a critical genome contained within the mitochondria of eukaryotic cells, with many copies present in each mitochondrion. Mutations in mtDNA often are inherited and can lead to severe health problems, including various inherited diseases and premature aging. The lack of efficient repair mechanisms and the susceptibility of mtDNA to damage exacerbate the threat to human health. Heteroplasmy, the presence of different mtDNA genotypes within a single cell, increases the complexity of these diseases and requires an effective editing method for correction. Recently, gene-editing techniques, including programmable nucleases such as restriction endonuclease, zinc finger nuclease, transcription activator-like effector nuclease, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated 9 and base editors, have provided new tools for editing mtDNA in mammalian cells. Base editors are particularly promising because of their high efficiency and precision in correcting mtDNA mutations. In this review, we discuss the application of these techniques in mitochondrial gene editing and their limitations. We also explore the potential of base editors for mtDNA modification and discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with their application in mitochondrial gene editing. In conclusion, this review highlights the advancements, limitations and opportunities in current mitochondrial gene-editing technologies and approaches. Our insights aim to stimulate the development of new editing strategies that can ultimately alleviate the adverse effects of mitochondrial hereditary diseases.

Gene therapy for mitochondrial disorders

In this review, we detail the current state of application of gene therapy to primary mitochondrial disorders (PMDs). Recombinant adeno-associated virus-based (rAAV) gene replacement approaches for nuclear gene disorders have been undertaken successfully in more than ten preclinical mouse models of PMDs which has been made possible by the development of novel rAAV technologies that achieve more efficient organ targeting. So far, however, the greatest progress has been made for Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy, for which phase 3 clinical trials of lenadogene nolparvovec demonstrated efficacy and good tolerability. Other methods of treating mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disorders have also had traction, including refinements to nucleases that degrade mtDNA molecules with pathogenic variants, including transcription activator-like effector nucleases, zinc-finger nucleases, and meganucleases (mitoARCUS). rAAV-based approaches have been used successfully to deliver these nucleases in vivo in mice. Exciting developments in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology have achieved in vivo gene editing in mouse models of PMDs due to nuclear gene defects and new CRISPR-free gene editing approaches have shown great potential for therapeutic application in mtDNA disorders. We conclude the review by discussing the challenges of translating gene therapy in patients both from the point of view of achieving adequate organ transduction as well as clinical trial design.

Immunogenicity of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) Vectors for Gene Transfer

Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) have emerged as promising gene delivery vehicles resulting in three US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and one European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved AAV-based gene therapies. Despite being a leading platform for therapeutic gene transfer in several clinical trials, host immune responses against the AAV vector and transgene have hampered their widespread application. Multiple factors, including vector design, dose, and route of administration, contribute to the overall immunogenicity of AAVs. The immune responses against the AAV capsid and transgene involve an initial innate sensing. The innate immune response subsequently triggers an adaptive immune response to elicit a robust and specific response against the AAV vector. AAV gene therapy clinical trials and preclinical studies provide important information about the immune-mediated toxicities associated with AAV, yet studies suggest preclinical models fail to precisely predict the outcome of gene delivery in humans. This review discusses the contribution of the innate and adaptive immune response against AAVs, highlighting the challenges and potential strategies to mitigate these responses, thereby enhancing the therapeutic potential of AAV gene therapy.