The parental journey of fetal care: a systematic review and metasynthesis

Fetal Consultation, Delivery Planning, and Perinatal Transition for Congenital Neurologic Disorders

Anomalies of the central nervous system (CNS) are a frequent referral indication for perinatal evaluation and management through fetal neurology consultation. This multidisciplinary field is evolving quickly to provide adequate care throughout the perinatal continuum. In this article, we will highlight current practice standards in fetal neurology as well as unique challenges, important considerations for fetal and postnatal care of infants with congenital neurologic conditions, and future outlooks for improving the care of patients and families impacted by CNS anomalies.

Voices of parents of children with major congenital anomalies admitted to the NICU: initial diagnosis, hospitalization, and discharge home

OBJECTIVE

To identify challenges vs. supports in the NICU and after NICU discharge for parents of an infant with a major congenital anomaly.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative study.

RESULTS

We interviewed 18 parents (13 mothers, 5 fathers) whose children were admitted to our our NICU with a major congenital anomaly. In the NICU, challenges were navigating parenthood with significant impact on parent mental health, adjusting to changing healthcare providers, and need for better interdisciplinary communication. After discharge home, challenges were an initial adjustment to life without NICU monitoring, loss of NICU medical resources, burden of caregiving, continued healthcare utilization, and financial impact.

CONCLUSION

Key supports that were helpful to families were empathetic and consistent healthcare teams throughout their care journey, especially nurses; healthcare team members who went beyond medical care, consistent communication, parent engagement in NICU care, ongoing parent mental health support, and peer resources after discharge home.

An Observational Study of Dialogue about Uncertainty in Clinician-Family Counseling Conversations Following Prenatal Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease

Objective

Families who receive a prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease (cCHD) often experience severe psychological distress and identify uncertainty as a key source of that distress. This study examined clinician-family conversations during initial fetal cardiology consultations to identify the topics of uncertainty discussed.

Methods

In this observational, qualitative study, initial fetal cardiology consultations were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by two independent coders. A codebook was inductively and deductively developed and applied. This content analysis focused on uncertainty-related codes and associated themes.

Results

During 19 consultations including five clinicians, 13 different cardiac diagnoses were discussed (seven with high mortality risk). Median consultation length was 37 min (IQR: 26-51), with only 11% of words spoken by families. On average, 51% of total words spoken focused on uncertainty in relation to cardiac diagnosis, etiology, comorbidities, prognosis, childbirth, therapeutics, and logistics. Family-initiated discussion on uncertainty largely focused on childbirth and pregnancy and postpartum logistics.

Conclusions

Half of dialogue within initial fetal cardiology encounters discussed uncertainty surrounding prenatally diagnosed cCHD. Parent and clinician perspectives should be gathered on the essential content and optimal delivery of uncertainty-related topics.

Innovation

This study is conceptually and methodologically innovative as one of the first to examine audio-recorded dialogue between fetal cardiology clinicians and families.

Mental health in pregnancy complicated by fetal anomaly: depression screening and referrals in a single fetal care center

OBJECTIVE

To quantify depression screening rates in a fetal care center, identify characteristics associated with screenings and identify mental health referral uptake rates STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study of 166 patients in a single fetal care center investigated patients screened during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale RESULTS: Patients screened positive for depression at a rate of 31.9% using 10 as the cut-off score at their first mental health consult following diagnosis. Patients with a prior mental health diagnosis and lacked insurance or had state insurance were more likely to screen positive. Additionally, patients were more likely to screen positive with a severe fetal diagnosis or uncertain fetal prognosis. Patients were likely to accept a referral for therapy; fewer accepted a referral for pharmacotherapy CONCLUSION: Fetal care center patients are at risk of depressed mood and may be identified through universal screening. Particular attention should be provided to patients with an uncertain fetal prognosis and other identified characteristics.

Nurse-guided Mobile Health Care Program to Reduce Emotional Distress Experienced by Parents of Infants Prenatally Diagnosed with Critical Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study

Background

Following prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD), parents encounter emotional distress while facing caregiving challenges. Supportive psycho-educational interventions using mobile health (mHealth) can make care more accessible.

Objectives

We tested a novel nurse-guided mHealth care program, Preparing Heart and Mind™ (PHM™), with the objectives of examining feasibility and estimating the effect of the intervention on parents' emotional distress.

Methods

This pilot study design randomized participants using a 2:1 intervention to control ratio. Analysis involved description of retention, and intervention attendance and engagement, and adjusted linear mixed models to estimate group differences in depressive (CES-D), anxiety (STAI-S), and traumatic stress (IES-r) symptoms.

Results

The sample included 55 parents (n=38 PHM™ group, n=17 control). Complete retention of 37 (67%) parents included 29 (76%) in the PHM™ group and 8 (47%) control. Most attrition was due to infant death (7 parents), transplant referral (2 parents), or postnatal diagnostic ineligibility (4 parents). For the PHM™ group, ≥96% of parents attended pre- and postnatal sessions and most (65%) messaged with the nurse. mHealth engagement was highest prenatally, with handling uncertainty the most viewed topic (average 94% pages viewed). In linear mixed models analyses, the PHM™ group had on average 4.84 points lower depression (95% CI: -10.68-1.04), 6.56 points lower anxiety (-14.04-0.92), and 6.28 points lower trauma (-14.44-1.88) scores by study end.

Conclusion

Findings suggest that a nurse-guided mHealth approach is feasible and may contribute to a clinically important reduction in parents' emotional distress.

Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers

INTRODUCTION

Fetal care centers (FCCs) in the USA lack a standardized instrument to measure person-centered care. This study aimed to develop and validate the Person-Centered Care in Fetal Care Centers (PCC-FCC) Scale.

METHODS

Initial items were developed based on literature and input from clinicians and former patients. A Delphi study involving 16 experts was conducted to validate the content and construct. Through three rounds of online questionnaires using open-ended questions and Likert scales, consensus on item clarity and relevancy was established. The resulting items were then piloted with former fetal care center patients via a web-based survey. The instrument's reliability and validity were validated using Cronbach's α and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing scores with the Revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) Questionnaire.

RESULTS

258 participants completed the 48-item pilot PCC-FCC survey, categorized into six domains. Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor, 28-item scale. Internal consistency of the final scale had good reliability (α = 0.969). Data supported content, construct, and concurrent validity.

CONCLUSION

The PCC-FCC Scale is a reliable and valid measure of person-centered care in U.S. FCCs. It can be used to enhance services and begin connecting person-centered care to maternal-child health outcomes.

Interdisciplinary fetal neurology care: Current practice, challenges, and future directions

As the field of fetal-neonatal neurology has expanded over the past 2 decades with increasingly complex diagnoses, multidisciplinary collaboration with many subspecialties including genetics, neonatology, obstetrics, maternal fetal medicine, surgical sub-specialties, cardiology, radiology, palliative care, and ethics has needed to evolve to strive to offer optimal patient care. While comprehensive care delivery with an inter-disciplinary approach is preferred, there are often barriers based on numerous health disparities especially in resource limited settings. Even in the context of comprehensive care, diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty lead to challenges for providers during fetal neurology consultations. We present a case that highlights advantages of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary team in caring for the medical and social challenges of patients faced with a fetal neurologic diagnosis. Inter-disciplinary training focusing on maternal, fetal, neonatal, and childhood neurodevelopmental course and collaboration among the numerous stakeholders that contribute to fetal neurology practice is needed to provide optimal counseling and care for families faced with a fetal neurological diagnosis.

Using MRI-derived observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume to predict lethality in fetal skeletal dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypoplasia is the primary cause of perinatal death in lethal skeletal dysplasias. The antenatal ultrasound correlates for lethality are indirect, measuring the thorax (thoracic circumference, TC) or femur compared to the abdomen (TC/AC, FL/AC). A single study has correlated lethality with the observed-to-expected total lung volume (O/E-TFLV) on fetal MRI in 23 patients.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to define a cutoff value to predict lethality more specifically using MRI-derived O/E-TFLV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two large fetal center databases were searched for fetuses with skeletal dysplasia and MRI; O/E-TFLV was calculated. Ultrasound measures were included when available. Each was evaluated as a continuous variable against lethality (stillbirth or death in the first month of life). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses evaluated the prediction ability. AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 80 fetuses met inclusion criteria. O/E-TFLV < 0.49 was a significant risk factor in predicting lethality, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.63 and 0.93, respectively, and an AUC of 0.81 (P < 0.001). FL/AC < 0.129 was also a strong variable with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.73, 0.88, and 0.78, respectively (P < 0.001). TC/AC and TC percentile were not significant risk factors for lethality. An O/E-TFLV of < 0.38 defines a specificity for lethality at 1.00.

CONCLUSION

MRI-derived O/E-TFLV and US-derived FL/AC are significant predictors of lethality in fetuses with skeletal dysplasia. When prognosis is uncertain after ultrasound, calculation of MRI-derived O/E-TFLV may provide additional useful information for prognosis and delivery planning.

An mHealth, patient engagement approach to understand and address parents' mental health and caregiving needs after prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease

Objective

To provide an overview of the development of the Preparing Heart and Mind™ (PHM™) care program designed for parents with a prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) and describe issues of parental concern, caregiving competencies, and type and timing of PHM™ topics.

Methods

Guided participation theory underpinned intervention development and a mixed methods pilot of a novel, nurse-guided mHealth intervention. Parents were enrolled from the third trimester of pregnancy-12 weeks postnatally. Online surveys, session transcripts, and app use were descriptively analyzed.

Results

The sample included 19 mothers/birthing persons and 15 caregiving partners randomized to the intervention group. In 49 sessions, mental health/wellbeing (94%) and condition-specific information (86%) were top issues. Many caregiving competencies were developed, with mothers/birthing persons often focused on feeding (86%). Regulating emotions and co-parenting consistently needed support. PHM™ topics of preparing for hospitalization (47%) and handling uncertainty (45%) were most discussed. Two cases further characterize findings.

Conclusion

Nurse-parent collaborative understanding of issues emphasized the need for mental health assessments. Prenatal intervention opportunities were underscored through discussions of caregiving issues and PHM™ topics.

Innovation

PHM™ represents an innovative approach that holds promise for supporting parents' mental health and caregiving needs outside the healthcare setting.

Fetal Anomaly: Family Experiences and Preferences for Care: An Integrative Review

BACKGROUND

The prenatal diagnosis of a fetal anomaly is unexpected, creating a family crisis. Expectant parents are at an increased risk for perinatal depression and traumatic stress. Prior reviews examined parents' experiences when terminating but not continuing the pregnancy. This review synthesized qualitative research to describe the experiences, emotional responses, and needs of families continuing their pregnancy.

METHODS

An integrative review was performed using the Whitemore and Knafl methodology and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2200 on the experiences of fetal anomaly was performed using 5 databases. Eligible articles included qualitative studies describing families' experiences with a fetal anomaly diagnosis who elected to continue their pregnancy. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Critical Skills Appraisal Program checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 678 article results, 16 met inclusion criteria. There were 298 participants from 5 countries. The major overarching theme of Response to the Diagnosis of Fetal Anomaly was identified. The major categories were emotional response, coping strategies, influences, health care experiences, and family needs. Uncertainty and grief were the most common emotions.

DISCUSSION

Parents choosing to continue pregnancy benefit from compassionate, sensitive care, and accurate, concise information, provided in tailored instruction using multiple styles.

"We All Want to Be Able to Tell You Something Hopeful": Clinicians' Experiences Providing Maternal-Fetal Surgery Counseling

INTRODUCTION

Prenatal counseling about maternal-fetal surgery can be traumatic and confusing for pregnant people. It can also be technically and emotionally complex for clinicians. As maternal-fetal surgery rapidly advances and becomes more common, more evidence is needed to inform counseling practices. The objective of this study was to develop a deeper understanding of the methods clinicians currently use to train for and provide counseling, as well as their needs and recommendations for future education and training.

METHODS

We used interpretive description methods and interviewed interprofessional clinicians who regularly counsel pregnant people about maternal-fetal surgery.

RESULTS

We conducted 20 interviews with participants from 17 different sites who were maternal-fetal medicine specialists (30%), pediatric surgeons (30%), nurses (15%), social workers (10%), a genetic counselor (5%), a neonatologist (5%), and a pediatric subspecialist (5%). Most were female (70%), non-Hispanic white (90%), and practiced in the Midwest (50%). We identified four overarching themes: (1) contextualizing maternal-fetal surgery counseling; (2) establishing shared understanding; (3) supporting decision-making; and (4) training for maternal-fetal surgery counseling. Within these themes, we identified key practice differences among professions, specialties, institutions, and regions.

CONCLUSION

Participants are committed to practicing informative and supportive counseling to empower pregnant people to make autonomous decisions about maternal-fetal surgery. Nevertheless, our findings indicate a dearth of evidence-based communication practices and guidance. Participants identified significant systemic limitations affecting pregnant people's decision-making options related to maternal-fetal surgery.

Role of palliative care in fetal neurological consultations: Guiding through uncertainty and hope

Fetal neurology is a rapidly evolving and expanding field. Discussions about diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, and goals of care often begin in the antenatal period. However, there are inherent challenges to fetal counseling of neurological diagnoses due to limitations of fetal imaging, prognostic uncertainty, and variability in neurodevelopmental outcomes. In the midst of uncertainty, families are challenged with preparing a care plan for their baby while simultaneously experiencing profound grief. The paradigms of perinatal palliative care can assist with the grieving process and help frame diagnostic testing and complex decision-making within the context of a family's spiritual, cultural, and social belief system. This ultimately leads to a shared decision-making process and value driven medical care. While perinatal palliative care programs have expanded, many families faced with such diagnoses never meet with a palliative care team prior to delivery. Moreover, there is significant variability in the availability of palliative care services throughout the country. Using an illustrative vignette of a patient with a prenatally diagnosed encephalocele, this review aims to provide a basic framework of perinatal palliative care for fetal neurology diagnoses that emphasizes 1) importance of clear, consistent, and transparent communication among all subspecialists and families, 2) creation of a palliative care birth plan, 3) importance of consistent care providers and longitudinal points of contact prenatally and post-delivery, 4) close communication between the prenatal and post-natal providers to allow for optimal continuity of care, and 5) recognize that information, care plans, and goals of care often evolve over time.

The value and limitations of using predetermined criteria in decision making for maternal-fetal interventions

Maternal-fetal interventions-such as prenatal fetal myelomeningocele (MMC) repair-are at the forefront of clinical innovation within maternal-fetal medicine, pediatric surgery, and neonatology. Many centers determine eligibility for innovative procedures using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria based on seminal studies, for example, the "Management of Myelomeningocele Study" for prenatal MMC repair. What if a person's clinical presentation does not conform to predetermined criteria for maternal-fetal intervention? Does changing criteria on a case-by-case basis (i.e., ad hoc) constitute an innovation in practice and flexible personalized care or transgression of commonly held standards with potential negative consequences? We outline principle-based, bioethically justified answers to these questions using fetal MMC repair as an example. We pay special attention to the historical origins of inclusion and exclusion criteria, risks and benefits to the pregnant person and the fetus, and team dynamics. We include recommendations for maternal-fetal centers facing these questions.

What is Known About Critical Congenital Heart Disease Diagnosis and Management Experiences from the Perspectives of Family and Healthcare Providers? A Systematic Integrative Literature Review

The experience of diagnosis, decision-making and management in critical congenital heart disease is layered with complexity for both families and clinicians. We synthesise the current evidence regarding the family and healthcare provider experience of critical congenital heart disease diagnosis and management. A systematic integrative literature review was conducted by keyword search of online databases, MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO, Cochrane, cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL Plus) and two journals, the Journal of Indigenous Research and Midwifery Journal from 1990. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to search results with citation mining of final included papers to ensure completeness. Two researchers assessed study quality combining three tools. A third researcher reviewed papers where no consensus was reached. Data was coded and analysed in four phases resulting in final refined themes to summarise the findings. Of 1817 unique papers, 22 met the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of the included studies was generally good, apart from three of fair quality. There is little information on the experience of the healthcare provider. Thematic analysis identified three themes relating to the family experience: (1) The diagnosis and treatment of a critical congenital heart disease child significantly impacts parental health and wellbeing. (2) The way that healthcare and information is provided influences parental response and adaptation, and (3) parental responses and adaptation can be influenced by how and when support occurs. The experience of diagnosis and management of a critical congenital heart disease child is stressful and life-changing for families. Further research is needed into the experience of minority and socially deprived families, and of the healthcare provider, to inform potential interventions at the healthcare provider and institutional levels to improve family experience and support.

Clinical trial of a birth and parenting planning program for women diagnosed with fetal anomalies: A feasibility study

AIM

We assessed the feasibility of the Birth and Parenting Planning (BPPing) program we developed to support women diagnosed with fetal anomalies.

METHODS

We conducted a feasibility study using a quasi-experimental, post-test only, non-equivalent groups design. We assessed feasibility from four aspects: (1) Demand: birth plan submitting rate (primary outcome); (2) Acceptability: woman's satisfaction of care scale (SATISFACTION) and Visual Analog Scale for care satisfaction; (3) Preliminary efficacy: women's recognition of being able to express and share her hopes scale (HOPES); and (4) Safety: obstetric/neonatal outcomes and frequency of women's referral to a psychological counselor. Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 62 women with fetal anomalies attending a perinatal medical center for antenatal check-ups. Of these, 51 women (median age: 34 years) received either the BPPing program (intervention group: n = 25) or the usual care (control group: n = 26). The birth plan submitting rates were 96% (intervention group, 24/25) and 7.7% (control group, 2/26). The intervention group had a significantly higher total score on HOPES at postpartum (U = 441.5, p = 0.027). Upon subgroup analysis based on parity, in the intervention group only, the multiparas had a higher score on the SATISFACTION item, "I would recommend the care I received to someone in a similar situation". There were no adverse events in either group.

CONCLUSION

The BPPing program was feasible in supporting women diagnosed with fetal anomalies in terms of demand, acceptability, preliminary efficacy, and safety.

Hopes expressed in birth plans by women diagnosed with fetal anomalies: a qualitative study in Japan

Background

Recent advances in prenatal screening and diagnosis have resulted in an increasing number of women receiving a diagnosis of fetal anomalies. In this study, we aimed to clarify the hopes for childbirth and parenting of women diagnosed with fetal anomalies and to suggest a family-centered care tailored for this situation in perinatal settings.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative study was performed. We recruited women diagnosed with fetal anomalies who were over 22 years old, beyond 22 weeks of gestation, and had scheduled pregnancy and delivery management at a tertiary perinatal medical center specializing in neonatal and pediatric care in a metropolitan area of Japan from April 2019 to December 2019. Women who were willing to participate received support from a midwife to create birth plans. Data were collected from the documented birth plans submitted by 24 women and analyzed using content analysis.

Results

We identified three themes of women’s hopes based on the descriptions of the submitted birth plans: (1) Hopes as women who are expecting childbirth, (2) Hopes as mothers of a baby, (3) Hopes of being involved in the family needs. Several distinctive hopes were clarified in the context of the women’s challenging situations. In describing their hopes, the women were neither overoptimistic or overstated their actual situations, nor caused embarrassment to the healthcare providers. The importance of supporting their involvement in baby matters in the way each family wants also emerged. However, several barriers to fulfilling the women’s hopes were identified including the babies’ conditions and hospital regulations against family visits or presence.

Conclusion

All three themes identified in the study provide important insights for analyzing more deeply ways of implementing a family-centered care for women diagnosed with fetal anomalies in perinatal settings. To improve women’s engagement in decision-making as a team member, women’s hopes should be treated with dignity and respect, and included in the perinatal care of women with abnormal fetuses. Further research is needed to improve the inclusion of women’s hopes in their care in clinical settings.

Trial registration

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000033622 (First registration date: 03/08/2018).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05115-x.

Care Levels for Fetal Therapy Centers

Fetal therapies undertaken to improve fetal outcome or to optimize transition to neonate life often entail some level of maternal, fetal, or neonatal risk. A fetal therapy center needs access to resources to carry out such therapies and to manage maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications that might arise, either related to the therapy per se or as part of the underlying fetal or maternal condition. Accordingly, a fetal therapy center requires a dedicated operational infrastructure and necessary resources to allow for appropriate oversight and monitoring of clinical performance and to facilitate multidisciplinary collaboration between the relevant specialties. Three care levels for fetal therapy centers are proposed to match the anticipated care complexity, with appropriate resources to achieve an optimal outcome at an institutional and regional level. A level I fetal therapy center should be capable of offering fetal interventions that may be associated with obstetric risks of preterm birth or membrane rupture but that would be very unlikely to require maternal medical subspecialty or intensive care, with neonatal risks not exceeding those of moderate prematurity. A level II center should have the incremental capacity to provide maternal intensive care and to manage extreme neonatal prematurity. A level III therapy center should offer the full range of fetal interventions (including open fetal surgery) and be able manage any of the associated maternal complications and comorbidities, as well as have access to neonatal and pediatric surgical intervention including indicated surgery for neonates with congenital anomalies.

Narrative Inquiry Into Nursing Care of Pregnant Women and Families in Specialized Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment Settings

OBJECTIVE

To examine how nurses describe caring for women and families in specialized fetal diagnosis and treatment settings.

DESIGN

We used narrative inquiry.

SETTING

A secure online survey platform.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited 26 nurses from the Fetal Therapy Nurse Network as a subsample from a prior Delphi study on the essential structures, processes, outcomes, and challenges of nursing practice in the emerging field of fetal diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

We used narrative inquiry and Clandinin's three-dimensional space narrative analysis to interpret the stories provided by participants to illustrate their practice and the relationship between their practice and care quality and health outcomes.

RESULTS

Participants described three primary types of fetal diagnoses and management scenarios: prenatal intervention (maternal-fetal surgery to treat a fetal anomaly), postnatal intervention (neonatal surgery), and perinatal palliative care (continuation of a pregnancy after a life-limiting fetal diagnosis). We identified three overarching themes related to nursing processes: A Sounding Board: Counseling the Pregnant Woman and Family, A Care Coordinator: Orchestrating a Complex Journey, and A Constant Presence: Being With the Pregnant Woman and Family. We also identified specific outcomes related to nursing care.

CONCLUSION

We used narrative inquiry to expand on prior research and advance the conceptualization of a model of nursing practice in fetal diagnosis and treatment settings. Our results provide a basis to begin to test theories that connect nursing practice to care quality and outcomes in clinical practice settings. To comprehensively evaluate and enhance care as it evolves and expands, the immediate and long-term effects of nursing practice must be identified.