1
|
Shaikh F, Wynne R, Castelino RL, Inglis SC, Davidson PM, Ferguson C. Practices, beliefs, and attitudes of clinicians in prescribing direct oral anticoagulants for obese adults with atrial fibrillation: a qualitative study. Int J Clin Pharm 2023; 45:962-969. [PMID: 37253952 PMCID: PMC10228882 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01583-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) and obesity affect over 60 and 650 million people, respectively. AIM This study aimed to explore clinician practices, beliefs, and attitudes towards the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese adults (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) with AF. METHOD Semi-structured interviews via video conference were conducted with multidisciplinary clinicians from across Australia, with expertise in DOAC use in adults with AF. Clinicians were invited to participate using purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were analysed in NVIVO using thematic analysis. RESULTS Fifteen clinicians including cardiologists (n = 5), hospital and academic pharmacists (n = 5), general practitioners (n = 2), a haematologist, a neurologist and a clinical pharmacologist participated. Interviews were on average 31 ± 9 min. Key themes identified were: Health system factors in decision-making Disparities between rural and metropolitan geographic areas, availability of health services, and time limitations for in-patient decision-making, were described; Condition-related factors in decision-making Clinicians questioned the significance of obesity as part of decision-making due to the practical limitations of dose modification, and the rarity of the extremely obese cohort; Decision-making in the context of uncertainty Clinicians reported limited availability, reliability and awareness of primary evidence including limited guidance from clinical guidelines for DOAC use in obesity. CONCLUSION This study highlights the complexity of decision-making for clinicians, due to the limited availability, reliability and awareness of evidence, the intrinsic complexity of the obese cohort and limited guidance from clinical guidelines. This highlights the urgent need for contemporary research to improve the quality of evidence to guide informed shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Shaikh
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rochelle Wynne
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ronald L Castelino
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Pharmacy Department, Blacktown Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
| | - Sally C Inglis
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Caleb Ferguson
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wihl J, Falini V, Borg S, Stahl O, Jiborn T, Ohlsson B, Nilbert M. Implementation of the measure of case discussion complexity to guide selection of prostate cancer patients for multidisciplinary team meetings. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15149-15158. [PMID: 37255390 PMCID: PMC10417062 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) provide an integrated team approach to ensure individualized and evidence-based treatment recommendations and best expert advice in cancer care. A growing number of patients and more complex treatment options challenge MDTM resources and evoke needs for case prioritization. In this process, decision aids could provide streamlining and standardize evaluation of case complexity. We applied the recently developed Measure of Case Discussion Complexity, MeDiC, instrument with the aim to validate its performance in another healthcare setting and diagnostic area as a means to provide cases for full MDTM discussions. METHODS The 26-item MeDiC instrument evaluates case complexity and was applied to 364 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in Sweden. MeDiC scores were generated from individual-level health data and were correlated with clinicopathological parameters, healthcare setting, and the observed clinical case selection for MDTMs. RESULTS Application of the MeDiC instrument was feasible with rapid scoring based on available clinical data. Patients with high-risk prostate cancers had significantly higher MeDiC scores than patients with low or intermediate-risk cancers. In the total study, population affected lymph nodes and metastatic disease significantly influenced MDTM referral, whereas comorbidities and age did not predict MDTM referral. When individual patient MeDiC scores were compared to the clinical MDTM case selection, advanced stage, T3/T4 tumors, involved lymph nodes, presence of metastases and significant physical comorbidity were identified as key MDTM predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS Application of the MeDiC instrument in prostate cancer may be used to streamline case selection for MDTMs in cancer care and may complement clinical case selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Wihl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and PathologyLund UniversityLundSweden
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region SkåneLundSweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation PhysicsSkåne University HospitalLundSweden
| | - Victor Falini
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region SkåneLundSweden
| | - Sixten Borg
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region SkåneLundSweden
- Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Olof Stahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and PathologyLund UniversityLundSweden
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region SkåneLundSweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation PhysicsSkåne University HospitalLundSweden
| | - Thomas Jiborn
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region SkåneLundSweden
- Department of UrologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
| | - Bjorn Ohlsson
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region SkåneLundSweden
| | - Mef Nilbert
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and PathologyLund UniversityLundSweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation PhysicsSkåne University HospitalLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosell L, Melander W, Lindahl B, Nilbert M, Malmström M. Registered nurses' views on consideration of patient perspectives during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:350. [PMID: 36494850 PMCID: PMC9732978 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) represent an integral component of modern cancer care and have increasingly been implemented to ensure accurate and evidence-based treatment recommendations. During MDTMs, multiple and complex medical and patient-related information should be considered by a multi-professional team whose members contribute various perspectives. Registered nurses (RNs) are expected to share information on the patient perspective at MDTMs. However, research suggests that RNs' contributions to case discussions are limited and that patient perspective is generally underrepresented. Our aim was to explore RNs' views of the prerequisites for and barriers to the inclusion of the patient perspective in MDTMs in Swedish cancer care. METHODS Data were collected from four focus group interviews with 22 RNs who worked as contact nurses in Swedish cancer care. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS The analysis identified two categories and five subcategories. The participants presented different views and expressed ambivalence about the patient perspective in MDTMs. Subcategories were related to medical versus holistic perspectives, the added value of patient perspective, and possibilities for patient contributions. The participants also discussed prerequisites for the patient perspective to be considered in MDTM decision-making process, with subcategories related to structures promoting attention to the patient perspective and determinants of RNs' contributions to case discussions in MDTMs. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates various views related to the patient perspective in MDTMs and identifies a great need to clarify the RN's role. Our results indicate that if enhanced presentation of the patient perspective in MDTMs is desired, key information points and structures must be established to collect and present relevant patient-related information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linn Rosell
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, 22 363 Lund, Sweden
| | - Wenche Melander
- Regional Cancer Centre South, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Berit Lindahl
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mef Nilbert
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, 22 363 Lund, Sweden
| | - Marlene Malmström
- grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ,grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Payne HA, Jain S, Peedell C, Edwards A, Thomas JA, Das P, Hansson Hedblom A, Woodward E, Saunders R, Bahl A. Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060506. [PMID: 35858729 PMCID: PMC9305805 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire. SETTING Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK. INTERVENTIONS Rectal hydrogel spacer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES None reported. RESULTS The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSION There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Ann Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Suneil Jain
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Clive Peedell
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Prantik Das
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | | | - Emily Woodward
- Health Economics, Boston Scientific AG, Solothurn, Switzerland
| | | | - Amit Bahl
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Differentiating solitary brain metastases from glioblastoma by radiomics features derived from MRI and 18F-FDG-PET and the combined application of multiple models. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5722. [PMID: 35388124 PMCID: PMC8986767 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09803-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the ability of radiomics derived from both MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) images to differentiate glioblastoma (GBM) from solitary brain metastases (SBM) and to investigate the combined application of multiple models. The imaging data of 100 patients with brain tumours (50 GBMs and 50 SBMs) were retrospectively analysed. Three model sets were built on MRI, 18F-FDG-PET, and MRI combined with 18F-FDG-PET using five feature selection methods and five classification algorithms. The model set with the highest average AUC value was selected, in which some models were selected and divided into Groups A, B, and C. Individual and joint voting predictions were performed in each group for the entire data. The model set based on MRI combined with 18F-FDG-PET had the highest average AUC compared with isolated MRI or 18F-FDG-PET. Joint voting prediction showed better performance than the individual prediction when all models reached an agreement. In conclusion, radiomics derived from MRI and 18F-FDG-PET could help differentiate GBM from SBM preoperatively. The combined application of multiple models can provide greater benefits.
Collapse
|
6
|
FENG X, LI Y, XIONG G, TONG G, XIONG X, HONG T, LUO Y. Application of MDT mode in the diagnosis and treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia. FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/fst.52921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ying LI
- Jiujiang First People's Hospital, China
| | | | | | | | - Tao HONG
- Jiujiang First People's Hospital, China
| | - Yun LUO
- Jiujiang First People's Hospital, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bazarbashi S, Alsharm A, Meshref A, Mrabti H, Ansari J, Ghosn M, Abdulla M, Urun Y. Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Middle East African countries: Challenges and strategic recommendations. Urol Ann 2022; 14:303-313. [PMID: 36505997 PMCID: PMC9731188 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_148_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the reliance on Western guidelines for managing prostate cancer (PC), there are wide variations and gaps in treatment among developing countries such as the Middle East African (MEA) region. A multidisciplinary team of experts from the MEA region engaged in a comprehensive discussion to identify the real-world challenges in diagnostics and treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) and provided insights on the urgent unmet needs. We present a consensus document on the region-specific barriers, key priority areas and strategic recommendations by experts for optimizing management of mCRPC in the MEA. Limited access to genetic testing and economic constraints were highlighted as major concerns in the MEA. As the therapeutic landscape continues to expand, treatment selection for mCRPC needs to be increasingly personalized. Enhanced genetic testing and judicious utilization of newer therapies like olaparib, articulated by reimbursement support, should be made accessible for the underserved populations in the MEA. Increasing awareness on testing through educational activities catalyzed by digital technologies can play a central role in overcoming barriers to patient care in the MEA region. The involvement of multidisciplinary teams can bridge the treatment gaps, facilitating holistic and optimal management of mCRPC. Region-specific guidelines can help health-care workers navigate challenges and deliver personalized management through collaborative efforts - thus curb health-care variations and drive consistency. Development of region-specific scalable guidelines for genetic testing and treatment of mCRPC, factoring in the trade-off for access, availability, and affordability, is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shouki Bazarbashi
- Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Address for correspondence: Dr. Shouki Bazarbashi, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, College of Medicine, Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. E-mail:
| | - Abdullah Alsharm
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hind Mrabti
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University-Rabat, Morocco
| | - Jawaher Ansari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE
| | - Marwan Ghosn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint Joseph University in Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is massively affecting our daily practice. Elective surgical service has been significantly altered, i.e. reduced overall service provision, special operating theatres’ precautions, as well as considerations for testing patients before surgery. The process of counselling patients and obtaining their consent is a must before any surgical intervention. Several factors can affect this process particularly amid the current pandemic crisis. Only with a full understanding of all the relevant facts, including risks and available alternatives, can patients give an ‘informed consent’. Therefore, we urologists need to be aware of the impact of the current COVID-19 situation on how to consent our patients. Abbreviations COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; PPE: personal protective equipment
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsayed Desouky
- Department of Urology, Wexham Park NHS Hospital, Berkshire, UK.,Department of Urology, Alexandria Main University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Differentiation of supratentorial single brain metastasis and glioblastoma by using peri-enhancing oedema region-derived radiomic features and multiple classifiers. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:3015-3022. [PMID: 32006166 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06460-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To differentiate supratentorial single brain metastasis (MET) from glioblastoma (GBM) by using radiomic features derived from the peri-enhancing oedema region and multiple classifiers. METHODS One hundred and twenty single brain METs and GBMs were retrospectively reviewed and then randomly divided into a training data set (70%) and validation data set (30%). Quantitative radiomic features of each case were extracted from the peri-enhancing oedema region of conventional MR images. After feature selection, five classifiers were built. Additionally, the combined use of the classifiers was studied. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the classification performance. RESULTS A total of 321 features were extracted, and 3 features were selected for each case. The 5 classifiers showed an accuracy of 0.70 to 0.76, sensitivity of 0.57 to 0.98, and specificity of 0.43 to 0.93 for the training data set, with an accuracy of 0.56 to 0.64, sensitivity of 0.39 to 0.78, and specificity of 0.50 to 0.89 for the validation data set. When combining the classifiers, the classification performance differed according to the combined mode and the agreement pattern of classifiers, and the greatest benefit was obtained when all the classifiers reached agreement using the same weight and simple majority vote method. CONCLUSIONS Three features derived from the peri-enhancing oedema region had moderate value in differentiating supratentorial single brain MET from GBM with five single classifiers. Combined use of classifiers, like multi-disciplinary team (MDT) consultation, could confer extra benefits, especially for those cases when all classifiers reach agreement. KEY POINTS • Radiomics provides a way to differentiate single brain MET between GBM by using conventional MR images. • The results of classifiers or algorithms themselves are also data, the transformation of the primary data. • Like MDT consultation, the combined use of multiple classifiers may confer extra benefits.
Collapse
|
10
|
Martínez-González NA, Plate A, Markun S, Senn O, Rosemann T, Neuner-Jehle S. Shared decision making for men facing prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:1153-1174. [PMID: 31413545 PMCID: PMC6656657 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s202034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: To synthesize the empirical evidence on the effectiveness of shared decision making (SDM) compared to usual care for prostate cancer (PC) treatment. Methods and results: A systematic review of academic (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, PsychINFO, and Scopus) and grey (clinicaltrials.gov, WHO trial search, meta-Register ISRCTN, Google Scholar, opengrey, and ohri.ca) literature, also identified from contacting authors and hand-searching bibliographies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs): 1) comparing SDM to usual care for decisions about PC treatment, 2) conducted in primary or specialized care, 3) fulfilling the key SDM features, and 4) reporting quantitative outcome data. Four RCTs from Canada (n=3) and the USA were included and comprised 1,065 randomized men, most (89.8%) of whom were in PC stage T1-T2. The studies reported 24 outcome measures. In 62.5% study estimates, SDM was similar to usual care at improving patient satisfaction and mood, and at reducing decisional conflict and decisional regret. In 37.5% study estimates, SDM significantly improved knowledge, perception of being informed and patient-perceived quality of life (QoL) at four weeks. There was a dearth of outcome data, particularly on the adherence to treatment and on patient-important and clinically relevant health outcomes such as symptoms and mortality. Conclusion: SDM may positively influence men's knowledge and may have a positive but short-term effect on patient-perceived QoL. The (long-term) effects of SDM on patient-related outcomes for decisions about PC treatment are unclear. Future research needs consensus about the interventions and outcomes needed to evaluate SDM and should address the absence of evidence on health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahara Anani Martínez-González
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, ZurichCH-8091, Switzerland
- Correspondence: Nahara Anani Martínez-GonzálezInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, ZurichCH-8091, SwitzerlandTel +41 044 255 8711Email
| | - Andreas Plate
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, ZurichCH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Markun
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, ZurichCH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Senn
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, ZurichCH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Rosemann
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, ZurichCH-8091, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Neuner-Jehle
- Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, ZurichCH-8091, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|