Accuracy of Weight Perception Among American Indian Tribal College Students

Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Obesity and Diversity

Background

The clinical implications of obesity differ, depending on race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation.

Methods

This roundtable discussion included 4 obesity specialists with expertise in the clinical management of obesity among diverse populations including Blacks, Hispanics/Latinos, Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Questioning (LGBTQ) individuals, and Native-Americans.

Results

One of the first obstacles towards overcoming disparities in managing obesity and its complications among diverse populations is understanding applicable terminology. This includes categorization terminology relative to Native Americans (for the purpose of assessing culture and possibly genetic predispositions), understanding the differences between Black African Americans and Black Africans, understanding the differences between the terms Hispanic and Latinx, and basic concepts behind different pronouns applicable to Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Questioning (LGBTQ) individuals. After being better able to grasp the input from patients with diverse backgrounds, universal obesity assessment and management principles can be then tailored utilizing a patient-centered approach.

Conclusion

Understanding the unique genetic, culture, and terminology regarding patients of different races, ethnicities, and sexual orientation may help clinicians better engage patients in managing obesity via utilizing a more patient-centered approach.

Sex differences in weight perception and weight gain among Black college students in the USA

Objectives

The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence of overweight/obesity and to explore sex differences in body weight perceptions and correlates of weight gain among Black students at 2 historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) in the USA.

Methods

Participants completed a paper-based survey, and their height and weight were measured (67% completion rate).

Results

The overweight and obesity rates were 33.8% and 26.9%, respectively. More females than males accurately assessed their weight (p<0.05). Body weight underestimation was associated with male sex, excellent/very good perceived overall health, and not being informed by a doctor of having overweight or obesity (p<0.01). Higher odds of ≥5% weight gain were related to female sex, living on campus, and not being informed by a doctor of having overweight or obesity (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Given the high overweight and obesity rates among Black students, HBCUs in the USA should develop intervention strategies for the prevention and management of overweight and obesity. College health educators at HBCUs need to provide regular check-ups or health screenings that help male students perceive their weight accurately and prevent weight underestimation. It is important for HBCUs to monitor and address weight gain among Black students as early as possible.

Comparison of Perceived and Measured Body Composition in a Military Population: An Exploratory Study

INTRODUCTION

Weight status perception (WSP) is the subjective assessment of one's own body weight. It is not correlated with the body mass index (BMI). People practicing sports, including overweight people, tend to perceive themselves as normal weight. The military is in a paradoxical position between the need to gain muscle mass for professional purposes while respecting BMI standards. Using body composition might be more advantageous than using BMI as part of an individual approach in making a decision about fitness to serve. However, measuring body composition is not easy in current practice, and a bridge between WSP and body composition would make it possible to develop a simple assessment tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study. We collected sociodemographic data, anthropometric data, and WSP.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight subjects were included. Among them, 71.1% were male. Mean age was 31.2 years (SD 8.9). The BMI was greater than 25 for 15 (39.5%) subjects. Twenty-four (63.2%) defined themselves as being overweight. Thirteen were overweight according to fat percentage (Fat%). A significant association (P = .008) was found between WSP and Fat%.

CONCLUSION

We were able to show a statistically significant association between WSP and Fat%. Such an association may be of great interest because the measurement of the Fat%, whatever the method used, is not easy in current practice. A replication of the study in the general population would be of great interest, especially since Fat% is closely associated with the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and many cancers.

Weight underestimation linked to anxiety and depression in a cross-sectional study of overweight individuals in a Sami and non-Sami Norwegian population: the SAMINOR Study

OBJECTIVES

Underestimation of overweight/obesity may prevent weight loss attempts, resulting in further weight gain and maintenance of overweight. Mental health benefits may nevertheless surpass negative consequences. Our main objective was to study the association between underestimation of overweight/obesity and symptoms of anxiety and depression in Sami and non-Sami populations.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING

The SAMINOR 2 Clinical Study with participants from 10 municipalities in Northern Norway enrolled between 2012 and 2014.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 3266 adults of multiethnic rural origin with overweight/obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m²) whereof 1384 underestimated their weight (42%).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measure was symptoms of anxiety and depression and secondary outcome measures were BMI and the demographic variables: sex, age, education and marital status.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of Sami men compared with non-Sami men were obese, and reported more symptoms of anxiety and depression. More men than women, and a higher proportion of Sami women compared with non-Sami women, underestimated their weight. Multivariable-adjusted analyses showed that women were less likely to underestimate their weight compared with men (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.55 in Sami and OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.42 in non-Sami), higher BMI was protective against weight underestimation (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.75 in Sami and OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.67 in non-Sami), slightly higher odds of weight underestimation were observed with increasing age in both ethnic groups (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05 in Sami and OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03 in non-Sami), while higher education lowered the odds in non-Sami (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.87). Weight underestimation was protectively associated with anxiety and depression in Sami men (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.84) and in non-Sami women (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.78) adjusted for age, BMI, education and marital status.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent of ethnicity, more men than women underestimated their weight. Underestimation of weight was protectively associated with anxiety and depression in Sami men and non-Sami women.

Racial/ethnic differences in body weight perception among U.S. college students

OBJECTIVE

To examine racial/ethnic differences in weight perception by sex among U.S. college students.

PARTICIPANTS

a national sample (N = 70,267) of college students selected from 2- and 4-year postsecondary institutions (N = 62) during the Fall semester from 2011 to 2014.

METHODS

This is a secondary data analysis using 4 years of American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment IIb data. Sex-stratified multinomial logistic regression was performed to investigate racial/ethnic differences in body weight perception.

RESULTS

Compared with non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic black men and women were more likely to underestimate their body weight (p < .01). Asian men and women were more likely to overestimate their body weight than non-Hispanic whites (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight-related interventions should take into account racial/ethnic differences in body weight perception.