Prenatal Care Adequacy Among Women With Disabilities: A Population-Based Study

Barriers and facilitators to perinatal care of women with disabilities in lower- and middle-income countries: a study protocol for scoping review of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

The Sustainable Development Goals have put emphasis on equitable healthcare access for marginalised groups and communities. The number of women with disabilities (WWD) to marry and have children is rapidly increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, these women experience multifaceted challenges to seeking perinatal care in LMICs. The objective of this scoping review is to document key facilitators and barriers to seeking perinatal care by WWD. We also will propose strategies for inclusive perinatal healthcare services for women with disabilities in LMICs.

METHODS

We will conduct a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature (published reports) of qualitative and mixed-methods studies on facilitators and barriers to seeking perinatal care for women with functional disabilities from 2010 to 2023 in LMICs. An electronic search will be conducted on Medline/PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Two researchers will independently assess whether studies meet the eligibility criteria for inclusion based on the title, abstract and a full-text review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This scoping review is based on published literature and does not require ethics approval. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences related to reproductive health, disability and inclusive health forums.

Impact of no publicly accessible prenatal education programming on patients and their care providers: a descriptive qualitative study in Nova Scotia, Canada

OBJECTIVE

Patients in Nova Scotia do not have access to public prenatal education programming. This study aimed to explore whether care providers find patients are uninformed or misinformed, and the impact of that on patients and their care providers with a focus on clinical outcomes, time, resources and informed decision-making.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 care providers around Halifax and Cape Breton. An interview guide (supplemental) of open-ended questions was used for consistency. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed to describe the contents of the interviews. Each interview was audio-taped and transcribed verbatim by an interdependent transcriber. Transcripts were analysed using established techniques in qualitative descriptive research including coding, grouping, detailing and comparing the data using NVivo V.12 software. A co-coder (SS) independently coded two interviews for inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

The study revealed six themes: (1) concern for a significant population of Nova Scotians experiencing pregnancy, birth and postpartum uninformed and misinformed, (2) consequences for patients who are uninformed and misinformed, (3) more time and resources spent on care for patients who are uninformed or misinformed, (4) patients and their care providers need a publicly available education programme, particularly vulnerable populations, (5) emphasis on programme quality and disappointment with the programme previously been in place and (6) recommendations for an effective prenatal education programme for Nova Scotians.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows care providers believe a public prenatal education programme could improve health literacy in Nova Scotia. Patients are seeking health education, but it is not accessible to all and being uninformed or misinformed negatively impacts patients' experiences and outcomes. This study revealed excess time and resources are being spent on individualised prenatal education by care providers with high individual and system-wide cost and explored the complicated process of providing patient-centred care for people who are uninformed or misinformed.

Leading Stressors and Coping Strategies Associated With Maternal Physical and Mental Health During the Extended Postpartum Period

INTRODUCTION

A critical gap exists in understanding stressors and coping that affect women's health beyond 6 weeks postpartum. Using new stressor and coping scales tailored to postpartum women, we examined the relationship of postpartum-specific stressors and coping to women's physical and mental health between 2 to 22 months after childbirth.

METHODS

A total of 361 women of diverse race, ethnicity, and functional abilities recruited through clinical and online methods completed online surveys that included Sources of Stress-Revised subscales, such as overload, changes after pregnancy, and low support resources; Postpartum Coping Scale subscales, such as self-regulation, self-care, and health promotion; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health, covering physical and mental health dimensions; and social demographic items. Analyses included hierarchical linear regression models adjusted for social factors.

RESULTS

Education and employment were the only social factors associated with physical and mental health, respectively. After adjusting for social factors, overload (P < .001) and coping through health promotion (P = .020) were the only additional variables associated with physical health. After adjusting for social factors, overload (P < .001) and low support resources (P = .002) and coping through self-care (P = .036) were the only additional variables associated with mental health. Thus, being overloaded was the key stressor associated with decreases in physical and mental health. Health promotion was associated with increases in physical health, and self-care was associated with increases in mental health.

DISCUSSION

These findings point to directions for health care and community interventions to promote health for postpartum women under stress. Strengths of our study include application of stress and coping scales tailored to postpartum women, whereas a limitation is use of a cross-sectional design.

Perinatal health framework for people with intellectual disability

We propose a framework for guiding research on perinatal health in people with intellectual disability (ID). We developed this framework based on the perinatal health framework for people with physical disabilities, American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities conceptual framework of human functioning, disability reproductive justice framework, trauma-informed care, and socio-ecological model. The framework reflects health outcomes of birthing people with ID and their infants that result from interactions of factors across the life course at policy (health, social, and disability policies), community (attitudes, social and physical environment), institutional (health care delivery-related factors, access to information/resources), interpersonal (social determinants of health/histories of trauma, social support, interactions with service-providers), and individual levels (demographics, intellectual functioning, adaptive behavior, health conditions, genetic factors, psychosocial factors, health behaviors). This framework will facilitate research to identify factors leading to perinatal health disparities in people with ID and development and evaluation of resources to address them.

Maternal Autistic Traits and Adverse Birth Outcomes

Importance

Women with a high level of autistic traits in the general population may experience larger health disparities during pregnancy, particularly women diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which in turn may be associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Objective

To investigate the association between maternal autistic traits and the risk of adverse birth outcomes in the general population.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included mothers of singletons from a nationwide, multicenter prospective birth cohort, the Japan Environmental Children's Study. Expecting mothers were recruited between January 2011 and March 2014. Data were analyzed between June 2021 and November 2023.

Exposures

Autistic traits were self-reported during the second and third trimesters using the short form of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Japanese version (AQ-J10) (score range, 0-10; clinical range, ≥7).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data on preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation) and neonates born small for gestational age (SGA) were transcribed from medical records. Additional analysis of gestational age groups (very preterm birth, <32 weeks' gestation; moderate-to-late preterm birth, 32-36 weeks' gestation) was also performed.

Results

Among 87 687 women (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [5.0] years) included in the study, 2350 (2.7%) had AQ-J10 scores within the clinical range yet only 18 (0.02%) were diagnosed with ASD. A higher AQ-J10 score was associated with an increased risk of all birth outcomes, including preterm births (relative risk [RR] per 1-SD increase, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09), moderate-to-late preterm births (RR per 1-SD increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), very preterm births (RR per 1-SD increase, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26), and child born SGA (RR per 1-SD increase, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06) after adjusting for maternal and pregnancy-related factors. The risks of all outcomes increased with higher AQ-J10 scores; compared with women below the clinical range, women within the clinical range had greater risk of preterm births (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.26), moderate-to-late preterm births (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22), very preterm births (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.89), and a child born SGA (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, higher level of maternal autistic traits was associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes, particularly very preterm birth. Acknowledging the risks and providing tailored and timely antenatal care support to women with a high level of autistic traits in the general population, particularly women with autistic traits within the clinical range, regardless of formal diagnosis, is warranted.

Reproductive health of women with intellectual disability: antenatal care, pregnancies and outcomes in the Dutch population

BACKGROUND

Research in a handful of countries found that women with intellectual disability (ID) faced barriers and risks regarding antenatal care and reproductive health. This study tested disparities between women in the Netherlands with and without ID in antenatal care, pregnancy rates and pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

Secondary analyses on the large representative panel of primary health patients in the Netherlands by the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) compared women in their reproductive age (18-49 years) with (n = 2397) and without (n = 228 608) indicators of ID. Bias due to underreporting and under-identification was reduced by linkage with an index of ID for the total Dutch population from Statistical Netherlands.

RESULTS

Women with ID were more likely to receive contraceptive care [95% confidence interval (CI) for odds ratio (OR) = 1.37-1.61] and became somewhat more often pregnant (95% CI OR = 1.06-2.30) than women from the general population, adjusting for age difference and follow-up time. No statistical differences were found in medical complications during pregnancy, delivery and immediately after birth, but women with indicators of ID had a higher risk of losing their pregnancy, including through induced abortion (95% CI OR = 1.26-1.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with ID have specific needs around contraceptive care and risks around their pregnancy that may require more awareness among practitioners and better understanding of the processes of care and decision-making.

Association between maternal marginalization and infants born with congenital heart disease in Ontario Canada

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the risk of congenital heart disease (CHD) since previous studies have yielded inconsistent results.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study, including all singleton live and still births in Ontario hospitals from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2018. We used linked records from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Information System, the Canadian Institute for Health Information databases, and the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON_Marg). ON_Marg was estimated at a dissemination area level using Canadian Census 2016 data and categorized into quintiles. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to examine the relationships between four ON_Marg indices (material deprivation, dependency, ethnic concentration, residential instability), as proxies for maternal SES and the risk of infant CHD. We adjusted for maternal age at birth, assisted reproductive technology, obesity, pre-existing health conditions, substance use during pregnancy, mental health conditions before and during pregnancy, rural residence, and infant's sex in the analysis.

RESULTS

Among the cohort of 776,799 singletons, 9,359 infants had a diagnosis of CHD. Of those, 3,069 were severe CHD and 493 cases were single ventricle CHD. The prevalence of all infant CHD types was higher for males relative to females. Compared to mothers living in neighbourhoods with the lowest material deprivation, mothers with highest material deprivation had a 27% (adjusted OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.18-1.37) higher odds of having an infant diagnosed with CHD. Mothers living in neighbourhoods with the highest minority ethnic and immigrant concentration tend to have infants with 11% lower odds of CHD (adjusted OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82-0.97) as compared to those living in the least ethnically diverse communities. Maternal dependency and residential stability quintiles were not significantly associated with the risk of CHD.

CONCLUSION

Higher maternal material deprivation was associated with increasing odds of infant CHD, whereas neighbourhood minority ethnic concentration was inversely associated with the odds of infant CHD. Our study further confirms that poverty is associated with CHD development. Future investigations might focus on the causal pathways between social deprivation, immigrant status, ethnicity, and the risk of infant CHD.

Impact of social-, health-, and disability-related factors on pregnancy outcomes in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A population-based latent class analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have elevated risks of perinatal complications, but few studies have examined how social, health, and disability-related factors affect these risks.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and describe subgroups of pregnant women with IDD according to social, health, and disability-related factors and examine the risks of perinatal complications in these subgroups compared to women without IDD.

METHODS

We performed a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, of women with (n = 1922) and without (n = 1,126,854) IDD, with a singleton birth in 2003-2018. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify subgroups of women according to social (e.g., age), health (e.g., chronic medical conditions), and disability-related (e.g., IDD type) characteristics. Modified Poisson regression was then used to compare the risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, and preterm birth across identified subgroups to women without IDD.

RESULTS

The LCA identified 4 classes of women with IDD: (1) young women who were mostly healthy and had little primary care before pregnancy (n = 253); (2) older women who were mostly healthy (n = 795); (3) young to mid-aged women who had significant comorbidities (n = 181); and (4) young women, many of whom were autistic, who had some medical comorbidities and significant psychiatric comorbidities (n = 693). Class 3 consistently had the greatest risks of perinatal complications, across all IDD groups, compared to women without IDD.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary care approaches tailored to the needs of at-risk women with IDD, in the preconception and perinatal periods.

Prenatal Care Experiences of Childbearing People With Disabilities in Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVE

To explore the care experiences of childbearing people with physical, sensory, and/or intellectual/developmental disabilities during pregnancy.

DESIGN

Descriptive qualitative.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada, where physician and midwifery care during pregnancy are provided at no direct cost to residents.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one people with physical, sensory, and/or intellectual/developmental disabilities (who self-identified as cisgender women [n = 29] and trans or nonbinary persons [n = 2]) who gave birth in the last 5 years.

METHODS

We recruited childbearing people with disabilities through disability and parenting organizations, social media, and our team's networks. Using a semistructured guide, we conducted in-person and virtual (e.g., telephone or Zoom) interviews with childbearing people with disabilities in 2019 to 2020. We asked participants about the services they accessed during pregnancy and if services met their needs. We used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to analyze interview data.

RESULTS

Across disability groups, we identified four common themes: Unmet Accommodation Needs, Lack of Coordinated Care, Ableism, and Advocacy as a Critical Resource. We found that these experiences manifested in unique ways based on disability type.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest the need for accessible, coordinated, and respectful prenatal care for people with disabilities, with the requirements of such care depending on the needs of the individual person with a disability. Nurses can play a key role in identifying the needs and supporting people with disabilities during pregnancy. Education and training for nurses, midwives, obstetricians, and other prenatal care providers should focus on disability-related knowledge and respectful prenatal care.

Comparison of the use of prenatal care services and the risk of preterm birth between pregnant women with disabilities and those without disabilities: A nationwide cohort study

Objective

The difficulties faced by pregnant women with disabilities in accessing health care may make them less likely to receive prenatal care. The aims of this study were to compare the number of prenatal services and the risk of preterm birth between pregnant women with and without disabilities.

Methods

A total of 2999 pregnant women aged ≥20 years with birth records in 2011-2014 in Taiwan were enrolled. Data were obtained from the Registration File for Physical and Mental Disabilities and the National Health Insurance Research Database. A 1:4 matching between pregnant women with disabilities and those without disabilities was performed. The logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations was used to analyze.

Results

The median of prenatal care services used by pregnant women with disabilities was 9.00 (interquartile range, IQR: 2.00). Pregnant women with disabilities used fewer services than those without disabilities (median, 10.00; IQR: 1.00). The disabled group (8.44%) had a significantly higher proportion of preterm births than did the non-disabled group (5.40%). The disabled group was at a 1.30 times higher risk of preterm births than was the non-disabled group.

Conclusions

Pregnant women with disabilities used significantly fewer prenatal care services and had a significantly higher risk of preterm birth than pregnant women without disabilities.

Neonatal Outcomes of Mothers With a Disability

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of neonatal complications among women with a disability.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study comprised all hospital singleton livebirths in Ontario, Canada from 2003 to 2018. Newborns of women with a physical (N = 144 187), sensory (N = 44 988), intellectual or developmental (N = 2207), or ≥2 disabilities (N = 8823) were each compared with 1 593 354 newborns of women without a disability. Outcomes were preterm birth <37 and <34 weeks, small for gestational age birth weight (SGA), large for gestational age birth weight, neonatal morbidity, and mortality, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), and NICU admission. Relative risks were adjusted for social, health, and health care characteristics.

RESULTS

Risks for neonatal complications were elevated among newborns of women with disabilities compared with those without disabilities. Adjusted relative risks were especially high for newborns of women with an intellectual or developmental disability, including preterm birth <37 weeks (1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.58), SGA (1.37, 1.24-1.59), neonatal morbidity (1.42, 1.27-1.60), NAS (1.53, 1.12-2.08), and NICU admission (1.53, 1.40-1.67). The same was seen for newborns of women with ≥2 disabilities, including preterm birth <37 weeks (1.48, 1.39-1.59), SGA (1.13, 1.07-1.20), neonatal morbidity (1.28, 1.20-1.36), NAS (1.87, 1.57-2.23), and NICU admission (1.35, 1.29-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a mild to moderate elevated risk for complications among newborns of women with disabilities. These women may need adapted and enhanced preconception and prenatal care, and their newborns may require extra support after birth.

Clinician-reported barriers to providing perinatal care to women with intellectual and developmental disabilities

Background

Research suggests that women with intellectual and developmental disabilities are at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Further, they report unmet perinatal care needs. This qualitative study examined clinician perspectives on barriers to providing perinatal care to women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Method

We conducted semi-structured interviews and one focus group with US obstetric care clinicians (n=17). We used a content analysis approach to code data and analyse them for larger themes and relationships.

Results

The majority of participants were white, non-Hispanic, and female. Participants reported barriers providing care to pregnant women with intellectual and developmental disabilities across individual (e.g., communication challenges), practice (e.g., identification of disability status), and system levels (e.g., lack of clinician training).

Conclusions

Clinician training and evidence-based guidelines for perinatal care of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities as well as services and supports during pregnancy are needed.