Nonnarcotic analgesics and hypertension

Screening Questions for Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Risk Knowledge

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate screening questions for estimating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) risk knowledge.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from a telephone interview of NSAID users 50 years or older from 39 physician practices in Alabama were used. Patient-reported awareness of prescription NSAID risk and health literacy were the independent variables, and a cumulative index score of objectively tested knowledge of 4 prominent NSAID risks was the dependent variable. General linearized latent and mixed model ordered logistic regression was used to estimate associations among the independent variables, covariates, and objectively tested NSAID risk knowledge. Population-averaged probabilities for levels of objectively tested NSAID risk knowledge were subsequently estimated.

RESULTS

Subjective awareness of any prescription NSAID risk (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-3.74), adequate health literacy (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.04-2.83), and physician counseling about 1 or more NSAID risks (AOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.09-2.61) were significantly and positively associated with NSAID risk knowledge. The probability of correctly answering at least 1 of the 4 NSAID risk knowledge questions was 70% in the absence of any subjective risk awareness and in less than adequate health literacy. Whereas the probability of correctly answering at least 1 of the 4 NSAID risk knowledge questions increased to 86% in the presence of subjective awareness of any prescription NSAID risk and adequate health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening questions for subjective NSAID risk awareness and health literacy are predictive of objectively tested NSAID knowledge and can be used to triage patients as well as subsequently initiate and direct a conversation about NSAID risk.

Self-reported health beliefs, lifestyle and health behaviours in community-based patients with diabetes and hypertension

OBJECTIVE

This study describes self-reported health and lifestyle behaviours and health risk beliefs among community patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

METHODS

Patients with both type 2 diabetes and hypertension were recruited from community family practices across 3 Canadian Maritime provinces. Patients completed a survey targeting health risk beliefs, and health and lifestyle behaviours. Analyses examined differences in patient beliefs by age and sex, as well by health and lifestyle behaviour.

RESULTS

Overall, 90.8% of patients believed that controlling both blood pressure and blood glucose were important, particularly women (p<0.01), and 92.8% felt that having both conditions put them at high risk for cardiovascular problems. Older patients reported higher antihypertensive medication adherence (p<0.0001). Most (90.8%) believed that prescription drug use was most helpful for controlling blood pressure, and this belief was associated with medication adherence (p<0.0001). Overall, patients who believed in the benefits of a given lifestyle behaviour were more likely to demonstrate the behaviour.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients surveyed were knowledgeable about their increased risk for cardiovascular problems. Patient lifestyle behaviours tended to mirror their health beliefs. These results provide important insight into the health beliefs and lifestyle behaviours of patients who receive the majority of their care in the community.

The use of H2 antagonists in treating and preventing NSAID-induced mucosal damage

Pain affects the quality of life for millions of individuals and is a major reason for healthcare utilization. As populations age, medical personnel will need to manage more and more patients suffering from pain associated with degenerative and inflammatory musculoskeletal disorders. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are an effective treatment for both acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain; however, their use is associated with potentially significant gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Guidelines suggest various strategies to prevent problems in those at risk for NSAID-associated GI complications. In this article, we review the data supporting one such strategy - the use of histamine type-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) - for the prevention of GI adverse events in NSAID users. Older studies suggest that high-dose H2RAs are effective in preventing upper GI ulcers and dyspepsia. This suggestion was recently confirmed during clinical trials with a new ibuprofen/famotidine combination that reduced the risk of ulcers by 50% compared with ibuprofen alone.

Pain treatment in arthritis-related pain: beyond NSAIDs

Managing pain from chronic conditions, such as, but not limited to, osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, requires the clinician to balance the need for effective analgesia against safety risks associated with analgesic agents. Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis pain is incompletely understood but involves both nociceptive and non-nociceptive mechanisms, including neuropathic mechanisms. Prevailing guidelines for arthritis-related pain do not differentiate between nociceptive and non-nociceptive pain, sometimes leading to recommendations that do not fully address the nature of pain. NSAIDs are effective in treating the nociceptive arthritis-related pain. However, safety concerns of NSAIDs may cause clinicians to undertreat arthritis-related pain. In this context, combination therapy may be more appropriate to manage the different pain mechanisms involved. A panel convened in November 2010 found that among the currently recommended analgesic products for arthritis-related pain, fixed-low-dose combination products hold promise for pain control because such products allow lower doses of individual agents resulting in decreased toxicity and acceptable efficacy due to synergy between the individual drugs. Better evidence and recommendations are required to improve treatment of chronic arthritis-related pain.

HZT-501 (DUEXIS(®); ibuprofen 800 mg/famotidine 26.6 mg) gastrointestinal protection in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis

Arthritis affects nearly 50 million people in the USA and, with the aging of the population, the prevalence is expected to rise. While NSAIDs are very effective in relieving pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), they are associated with side effects, including gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, which may manifest as dyspepsia, ulcers and/or bleeding. A number of approaches have been employed in an effort to either completely avoid or reduce the risk of GI toxicities associated with NSAID use. Two new products combining an NSAID with a gastroprotective agent have recently been approved and other agents are in the pipeline. Patient adherence to prescribed gastroprotective therapy is known to be poor, often resulting in an increased risk of GI events in patients taking NSAIDs. These newer combination products may fulfill an important need for many patients who need to receive NSAIDs for the pain of OA and RA, but who are also at risk of upper GI events. This article reviews preclinical and clinical results for a new fixed-dose combination of ibuprofen and famotidine, DUEXIS(®) (HZT-501), which has recently been approved in the USA for the relief of signs and symptoms of RA and OA and to decrease the risk of developing upper GI ulcers.

Over-the-counter ibuprofen and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding complications: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Exposure to over-the-counter (OTC) ibuprofen and other OTC non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is substantial. Although the literature on gastrointestinal (GI) safety of NSAID therapy is extensive, the risk profiles of OTC and prescription dosing are seldom separated, and few studies provide risks specific to OTC ibuprofen.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a literature review to evaluate the risk of GI bleeding events related to OTC ibuprofen use.

METHODS

Published clinical trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses of OTC ibuprofen use, defined as up to 1200 mg/day or stated as 'over the counter,' reporting endpoints of incidence rates and proportions of GI bleeding events (e.g., GI bleeding-related hospitalizations and deaths) were identified via MEDLINE through 2010. Data from these studies were summarized.

RESULTS

Twenty studies (nine observational, ten clinical trials, one meta-analysis) reporting incidence rates and proportions of a GI bleeding-related event associated with OTC or OTC-specific doses of ibuprofen were included. The frequency of a GI-related hospitalization was <0.2% for patients on OTC-comparable doses. Incidence rates among those using OTC-comparable doses ranged from 0 to 3.19 per 1000 patient-years. The incidence of a GI bleeding-related event increased with age and the use of concomitant medications, and there was a general, though not always statistically significant, ibuprofen dose-response relationship. The relative risk of any GI bleeding-related event ranged from 1.1 to 2.4 for users of OTC-specific doses of ibuprofen compared to non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies reported low incidence of GI bleeding events with use of OTC ibuprofen. Few published studies that specifically investigated OTC ibuprofen use were identified. Varying methodologies and definitions of exposure and outcomes prevented direct comparison of many results. Only studies that used the methods herein described were identified. Further research evaluating the risk of GI bleeding events in patients taking OTC-specific ibuprofen use may be useful.

Treatment of osteoarthritis in hypertensive patients

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Osteoarthritis and hypertension commonly co-exist. Treatment of osteoarthritis in hypertensive patients is a therapeutic challenge due to the adverse effects of some analgesics, especially non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), on blood pressure. Even small drug-induced rises in blood pressure due to therapy may significantly increase cardiovascular risk in these patients if sustained over the long term. Patients treated with certain classes of antihypertensive agent may be at particular risk of deterioration in blood pressure control with NSAID therapy. NSAIDs may also increase cardiovascular risk due to mechanisms other than by raising blood pressure.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We discuss the management of osteoarthritis in the hypertensive patient, review the evidence for the effects of paracetamol and NSAIDs on blood pressure and discuss novel therapeutic strategies for osteoarthritis that might diminish this problem. A literature search was undertaken in PubMed including the years 1980 - 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Insight will be gained into the complexity of treating patients with co-existent osteoarthritis and hypertension and into possible new approaches to treating osteoarthritis symptoms effectively in these patients while minimising any adverse impact on blood pressure control.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

There are ways to minimise the adverse impact of treatment of osteoarthritis on blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.

Treatment of hypertension in children and adolescents

The treatment of hypertension in children and adolescents has been markedly changed in recent years by several factors, including the publication of new consensus recommendations, the obesity epidemic, and the increased availability of information on efficacy and safety of antihypertensive medications in the young. In this review we present an updated approach to the outpatient management of hypertension in the child or adolescent, utilizing representative cases to illustrate important principles as well as possible controversies.

Racial/ethnic disparities in patient-reported nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) risk awareness, patient-doctor NSAID risk communication, and NSAID risk behavior

OBJECTIVE

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used and frequently lead to serious adverse events. Little is known about NSAID-related ethnic/racial disparities. We focused on differences in patient NSAID risk awareness, patient-doctor NSAID risk communication, and NSAID risk-avoidance behavior.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the Alabama NSAID Patient Safety Study. Eligible patients were > or = 65 years old and currently taking prescription NSAIDs (Rx NSAIDS). Generalized linear latent and mixed models accounted for nesting of patients within physicians.

RESULTS

Of all 404 participants, 32% were African American and 73% were female. The mean +/- SD age was 72.8 +/- 7.5 years, and 64% reported an annual household income <$20,000. African American patients were less likely than white patients to recognize any risk associated with over-the-counter (OTC) NSAIDs (13.3% versus 29.3%; P = 0.001) and Rx NSAIDs (31.3% versus 49.6%; P = 0.001), report that their doctor discussed possible NSAID-related gastrointestinal problems (38.0% versus 52.4%; P = 0.007), and take medications to reduce ulcer risk (30.5% versus 50.2%; P = 0.001). Patients with lower income and education reported significantly less risk awareness for OTC and Rx NSAIDs. Racial/ethnic differences persisted after adjusting for multiple confounders.

CONCLUSION

In this community-based study of low income elderly individuals receiving NSAIDs, we identified important racial/ethnic differences in risk awareness, communication, and behavior. Additional efforts are needed to promote safe NSAID use and reduce ethnic/racial disparities.

Adverse drug interactions involving common prescription and over-the-counter analgesic agents

BACKGROUND

Eight analgesic preparations with approved indications for acute pain were among the top 200 drugs prescribed in the United States in 2006. In addition, an estimated 36 million Americans use over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics daily. Given this volume of use, it is not surprising that a number of drug interactions involving analgesic drugs have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

This article examines the pharmacologic factors that enhance the clinical relevance of potential drug interactions and reviews the literature on drug interactions involving the most commonly used analgesic preparations in the United States.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for English-language articles published between January 1967 and July 2007. Among the search terms were drug interactions, acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib, NSAIDs, hydrocodone, oxycodone, codeine, tramadol, OTC analgesics, alcohol, ethanol, antihypertensive drugs, methotrexate, warfarin, SSRIs, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, serotonin syndrome, MAOIs, and overdose. Controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, and case reports were included in the review.

RESULTS

A number of case reports and well-controlled clinical trials were identified that provided evidence of the relatively well known drug-drug interactions between prescription/OTC NSAIDs and alcohol, antihypertensive drugs, high-dose methotrexate, and lithium, as well as between frequently prescribed narcotics and other central nervous system depressants. In contrast, the ability of recent alcohol ingestion to exacerbate the hepatotoxic potential of therapeutic doses of acetaminophen is not supported by either case reports or clinical research. Use of ibuprofen according to OTC guidelines in patients taking cardioprotective doses of aspirin does not appear to interfere with aspirin's antiplatelet activity, whereas chronic prescription use of ibuprofen and other NSAIDs may interfere. Low-dose aspirin intake appears to abolish the gastroprotective effects of cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors, including celecoxib. There is evidence of other less well known and potentially clinically significant drug-drug interactions, including the ability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to inhibit the analgesic activity of tramadol and codeine through inhibition of their metabolic activation, to induce serotonin syndrome when used chronically in the presence of high doses of tramadol through synergistic serotonergic action, and to increase the potential for gastrointestinal bleeding associated with NSAID therapy through additive or supra-additive antiplatelet activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the widespread use of analgesic agents, the overall incidence of serious drug-drug interactions involving these agents has been relatively low. The most serious interactions usually involved other interacting drugs with low therapeutic indices or chronic and/or high-dose use of an analgesic and the interacting drug.

New Diagnosis of Hypertension among Celecoxib and Nonselective NSAID Users: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND:

The use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been associated with increased blood pressure and hypertension. However, less is known about how the risk of hypertension is associated with cyclooxygenase 2 selective inhibitors (coxibs), especially celecoxib, the only coxib remaining on the market.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the risk of incident hypertension associated with the use of celecoxib and nonselective (NS) NSAIDs.

METHODS:

A cohort study was conducted using secondary data from the GE Centricity Electronic Medical Record database, which contains millions of patient records seen by thousands of physicians across the US. The index date was defined as the date of the first NSNSAID or celecoxib prescription between January 1, 1999, and June 30, 2004. Patients were included if they were aged 18 years or older and were enrolled for at least 365 days prior to the index date. Excluded were patients who had any prior diagnosis of hypertension or pregnancy-related hypertension during the pre- or postindex date period. Also excluded were patients who had any prior prescription for antihypertensive drugs, coxibs, or NSNSAIDs. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, each celecoxib user was matched to 2 NSNSAID users by sex, age (±5 y), propensity score (within 0.2 SD), and number of unique drugs (±20%). Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:

The final sample consisted of 51 444 patients, of whom 17 148 were on celecoxib and 34 296 were on NSNSAIDs. Relative to NSNSAID users, patients on celecoxib had a similar rate of postexposure hypertension incidence (HR 1.013; 95% CI 0.862 to 1.190).

CONCLUSIONS:

Results from a population-based cohort analysis of electronic medical records did not show any difference in the hazard rates of incident hypertension between celecoxib and NSNSAID users.

ANTECEDENTES:

El uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroidales (AINEs) ha sido asociado a un incremento en la presión arterial y en el riesgo de hipertensión. Sin embargo, el riesgo de hipertensión asociado al uso de una nueva clase de AINEs conocidos como los inhibidores selectivos de la ciclooxigenasa II ó COX-2, es menos claro.