Cardiopulmonary exercise variables in diastolic versus systolic heart failure

Hemodynamic Changes During Physiological and Pharmacological Stress Testing in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although disease etiologies differ, heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively) both present with clinical symptoms when under stress and impaired exercise capacity. The extent to which the adaptation of heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO) under stress conditions is altered can be quantified by stress testing in conjunction with imaging methods and may help to detect the diminishment in a patient’s condition early. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify hemodynamic changes during physiological and pharmacological stress testing in patients with HF. A systematic literature search (PROSPERO 2020:CRD42020161212) in MEDLINE was conducted to assess hemodynamic changes under dynamic and pharmacological stress testing at different stress intensities in HFpEF and HFrEF patients. Pooled mean changes were estimated using a random effects model. Altogether, 140 study arms with 7,248 exercise tests were analyzed. High-intensity dynamic stress testing represented 73% of these data (70 study arms with 5,318 exercise tests), where: HR increased by 45.69 bpm (95% CI 44.51–46.88; I2 = 98.4%), SV by 13.49 ml (95% CI 6.87–20.10; I2 = 68.5%), and CO by 3.41 L/min (95% CI 2.86–3.95; I2 = 86.3%). No significant differences between HFrEF and HFpEF groups were found. Despite the limited availability of comparative studies, these reference values can help to estimate the expected hemodynamic responses in patients with HF. No differences in chronotropic reactions, changes in SV, or CO were found between HFrEF and HFpEF. When compared to healthy individuals, exercise tolerance, as well as associated HR and CO changes under moderate-high dynamic stress, was substantially impaired in both HF groups. This may contribute to a better disease understanding, future study planning, and patient-specific predictive models.

Systematic Review Registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42020161212].

Physical Functioning in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly prevalent, yet interventions and therapies to improve outcomes remain limited. There has been increasing attention towards the impact of comorbidities and physical functioning (PF) on poor clinical outcomes within this population. In this review, we summarize and discuss the literature on PF in HFpEF, its association with clinical and patient-centered outcomes, and future advances in the care of HFpEF with respect to PF. Multiple PF metrics have been demonstrated to provide prognostic value within HFpEF, yet the data are less robust compared with other patient populations, highlighting the need for further investigation. The evaluation and detection of poor PF provides a potential strategy to improve care in HFpEF, and future studies are needed to understand if modulating PF improves clinical and/or patient-reported outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: • Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) commonly have impaired physical functioning (PF) demonstrated by limitations across a wide range of common PF metrics.• Impaired PF metrics demonstrate prognostic value for both clinical and patient-reported outcomes in HFpEF, making them plausible therapeutic targets to improve outcomes.• Clinical trials are ongoing to investigate novel methods of detecting, monitoring, and improving impaired PF to enhance HFpEF care.Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly prevalent, yet interventions and therapies to improve outcomes remain limited. As such, there has been increasing focus on the impact of physical performance (PF) on clinical and patient-centered outcomes. In this review, we discuss the state of PF in patients with HFpEF by examining the multitude of PF metrics available, their respective strengths and limitations, and their associations with outcomes in HFpEF. We highlight future advances in the care of HFpEF with respect to PF, particularly regarding the evaluation and detection of poor PF.

Invasive Hemodynamic and Metabolic Evaluation of HFpEF

Purpose of review

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex and heterogeneous condition of multiple causes, characterized by a clinical syndrome resulting from elevated left ventricular filling pressures, with an apparently unimpaired left ventricular systolic function. Although HFpEF has been long recognized as a distinct entity with significant morbidity for patients, its diagnosis remains challenging to this day. In recent years, few diagnostic algorithms have been postulated to aid in the identification of this condition. Invasive hemodynamic and metabolic evaluation is often warranted for the conclusive diagnosis and risk stratification of HFpEF, in patients presenting with undifferentiated DOE.

Recent findings

Rest and provoked hemodynamics remain the golden-standard diagnostic tool to unequivocally confirm the diagnosis of both established and incipient HFpEF, respectively. Cycle exercise hemodynamics is the paramount provocative maneuver to unveil this condition. Rapid saline loading does not offer a significant benefit over that of cycle exercise. Vasoactive agents can also uncover and confirm incipient HFpEF disease. The role of metabolic evaluation in patients presenting with idiopathic dyspnea on exertion (DOE) is of unparalleled value for those who have expertise in cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) interpretation; however, the average clinician who focuses solely on oxygen consumption will find it underwhelming. Invasive CPET stands alone as the ultimate diagnostic tool to discriminate between pulmonary, cardiovascular, and skeletal muscle disorders, and their respective contribution to DOE and exercise intolerance.

Summary

Several hemodynamic and metabolic parameters have demonstrated not only strong diagnostic value, but also predictive power in HFpEF. Additionally, these diagnostic methods have given rise to several therapeutic interventions that are now part of our clinical armamentarium. Regrettably, due to the heterogeneity and multicausality of HFpEF, none of the targeted interventions have been so far successful in decreasing the mortality burden of this prevalent condition.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in heart failure: A Sine qua non

A robust literature, over the last years, supports the indication of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Understanding exercise physiology is a crucial component of the critical evaluation of exercise intolerance. Shortness of breath and exercise limitation is often treated with an improper focus, partly because the pathophysiology is not well understood in the frame of the diagnostic spectrum of each subspecialty. A vital field and research area have been cardiopulmonary exercise test in heart failure with preserved/reduced ejection fraction, evaluation of heart failure patients as candidates for LVAD-Implantation, as well as for LVAD-Explantation and ultimately for heart transplantation. All the CPET variables provide synergistic prognostic discrimination. However, Peak VO2 serves as the most critical parameter for risk stratification and prediction of survival rate.

Prevalence and prognosis of respiratory muscle weakness in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Although respiratory muscle weakness (RMW) is known to predict prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), RMW prevalence and its prognosis in those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain unknown. We aimed to investigate whether the RMW predicted mortality in HFpEF patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre observational study with consecutive 1023 heart failure patients (445 in HFrEF and 578 in HFpEF). Maximal inspiratory pressure (PI_max) was measured to assess respiratory muscle strength at hospital discharge, and RMW was defined as PI_max <70% of predicted value. Endpoint was all-cause mortality after hospital discharge, and we examined the influence of RMW on the endpoint.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years, 134 patients (13.1%) died; of these 53 (11.9%) were in HFrEF and 81 (14.0%) in HFpEF. RMW was evident in 190 (42.7%) HFrEF and 226 (39.1%) HFpEF patients and was independently associated with all-cause mortality in both HFrEF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-3.88) and HFpEF (adjusted HR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.74-4.67) patients. Adding RMW to the multivariate logistic regression model significantly increased area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for all-cause mortality in HFpEF (AUC including RMW: 0.78, not including RMW: 0.74, P = 0.026) but not in HFrEF (AUC including RMW: 0.84, not including RMW: 0.82, P = 0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

RMW was observed in 39% of HFpEF patients, which was independently associated with poor prognosis. The additive effect of RMW on prognosis was detected only in HFpEF but not in HFrEF.

The Effect of Chinese Herbal Medicine on Quality of Life and Exercise Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has a good effect of alleviating symptoms and improving quality of life and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but it wasn't sufficiently valued and promoted because of the lack of evidence-based medical evidence. Aim: To systematically review the effect of CHM on quality of life and exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for Chinese and English studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Data, and China Science and Technology Journal Database. Databases were searched using terms relating to or describing CHM, HFpEF and randomized controlled trials, without any exclusion criteria for other types of diseases or disorders. Literature retrieval, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two investigators. Differences were resolved by consensus. RevMan 5.3.0 was used for data analysis. Quantitative synthesis was used when the included studies were sufficiently homogeneous and subgroup analyses were performed for studies with different sample sizes and blind methods. GRADEpro was used to grade the available evidence to minimize bias in our findings. Results: Seventeen studies with 2,724 patients were enrolled in this review. ROB assessments showed a relatively high selection and performance bias. Meta-analyses showed that compared with conventional western medicine, combined CHM and conventional western medicine could significantly improve 6-min walk distance (MD = 52.13, 95% CI [46.91, 57.34], P < 0.00001), and it seemed to be more effective as compared with combined placebo and conventional western medicine. Similar results were observed for quality of life and the results were better in a larger sample. The GRADEpro showed a very low to moderate level of the available evidence. Conclusion: Combined CHM and conventional western medicine might be effective to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life in HFpEF patients, but new well-designed studies with larger sample size, strict randomization, and clear description about detection and reporting processes are needed to further strengthen this evidence.

A novel cardiac output response to stress test developed to improve diagnosis and monitoring of heart failure in primary care

AIMS

Primary care physicians lack access to an objective cardiac function test. This study for the first time describes a novel cardiac output response to stress (CORS) test developed to improve diagnosis and monitoring of heart failure in primary care and investigates its reproducibility.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective observational study recruited 32 consecutive primary care patients (age, 63 ± 9 years; female, n = 18). Cardiac output was measured continuously using the bioreactance method in supine and standing positions and during two 3 min stages of a step-exercise protocol (10 and 15 steps per minute) using a 15 cm height bench. The CORS test was performed on two occasions, i.e. Test 1 and Test 2. There was no significant difference between repeated measures of cardiac output and stroke volume at supine standing and Stage 1 and Stage 2 step exercises (all P > 0.3). There was a significant positive relationship between Test 1 and Test 2 cardiac outputs (r = 0.92, P = 0.01 with coefficient of variation of 7.1%). The mean difference in cardiac output (with upper and lower limits of agreement) between Test 1 and Test 2 was 0.1 (-1.9 to 2.1) L/min, combining supine, standing, and step-exercise data.

CONCLUSIONS

The CORS, as a novel test for objective evaluation of cardiac function, demonstrates acceptable reproducibility and can potentially be implemented in primary care.

Role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in clinical stratification in heart failure. A position paper from the Committee on Exercise Physiology and Training of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Traditionally, the main indication for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in heart failure (HF) was for the selection of candidates to heart transplantation: CPET was mainly performed in middle-aged male patients with HF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Today, CPET is used in broader patients' populations, including women, elderly, patients with co-morbidities, those with preserved ejection fraction, or left ventricular assistance device recipients, i.e. individuals with different responses to incremental exercise and markedly different prognosis. Moreover, the diagnostic and prognostic utility of symptom-limited CPET parameters derived from submaximal tests is more and more considered, since many patients are unable to achieve maximal aerobic power. Repeated tests are also being used for risk stratification and evaluation of intervention, so that these data are now available. Finally, patients, physicians and healthcare decision makers are increasingly considering how treatments might impact morbidity and quality of life rather than focusing more exclusively on hard endpoints (such as mortality) as was often the case in the past. Innovative prognostic flowcharts, with CPET at their core, that help optimize risk stratification and the selection of management options in HF patients, have been developed.

Hemodynamic response to muscle reflex is abnormal in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

The aim of the present investigation was to assess the role of cardiac diastole on the hemodynamic response to metaboreflex activation. We wanted to determine whether patients with diastolic function impairment showed a different hemodynamic response compared with normal subjects during this reflex. Hemodynamics during activation of the metaboreflex obtained by postexercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) was assessed in 10 patients with diagnosed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and in 12 age-matched healthy controls (CTL). Subjects also performed a control exercise-recovery test to compare data from the PEMI test. The main results were that patients with HFpEF achieved a similar mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) response as the CTL group during the PEMI test. However, the mechanism by which this response was achieved was markedly different between the two groups. Patients with HFpEF achieved the target MAP via an increase in systemic vascular resistance (+389.5 ± 402.9 vs. +80 ± 201.9 dynes·s^-1·cm^-5 for HFpEF and CTL groups respectively), whereas MAP response in the CTL group was the result of an increase in cardiac preload (-1.3 ± 5.2 vs. 6.1 ± 10 ml in end-diastolic volume for HFpEF and CTL groups, respectively), which led to a rise in stroke volume and cardiac output. Moreover, early filling peak velocities showed a higher response in the CTL group than in the HFpEF group. This study demonstrates that diastolic function is important for normal hemodynamic adjustment to the metaboreflex. Moreover, it provides evidence that HFpEF causes hemodynamic impairment similar to that observed in systolic heart failure.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study provides evidence that diastolic function is important for normal hemodynamic responses during the activation of the muscle metaboreflex in humans. Moreover, it demonstrates that diastolic impairment leads to hemodynamic consequences similar to those provoked by systolic heart failure. In both cases the target blood pressure is obtained mainly by means of exaggerated vasoconstriction than by a flow-mediated mechanism.

Everolimus Attenuates Myocardial Hypertrophy and Improves Diastolic Function in Heart Transplant Recipients

Everolimus (EVL), one of the mammalian targets of rapamycin, is a next generation immunosuppressant that may have accessory anti-proliferative effects in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. However, little is known about the clinical relationship between EVL and regression of cardiac hypertrophy. A total of 42 HTx recipients received EVL therapy at post-HTx 150 days on median and had been followed at our institute for > 1 year between 2008 and 2014 [EVL (+) group]. We also observed 18 patients without EVL from post-HTx 150 days for 1 year [EVL (-) group]. There were no significant differences in baseline variables between the two groups. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and the ratio of early transmitral filling velocity to the peak early diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (E/e') decreased significantly during 1-year EVL treatment compared with the EVL (-) group. There were no differences in blood pressure and medications between the 2 groups. Improvement of LVMI and the E/e' ratio was not associated with trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors or EVL, but correlated with each baseline value. In conclusion, this EVL-incorporated immunosuppressant regimen attenuated cardiac hypertrophy as well as diastolic dysfunction in HTx recipients.

Developing therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current state and future directions

The burden of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is considerable and is projected to worsen. To date, there are no approved therapies available for reducing mortality or hospitalizations for these patients. The pathophysiology of HFpEF is complex and includes alterations in cardiac structure and function, systemic and pulmonary vascular abnormalities, end-organ involvement, and comorbidities. There remain major gaps in our understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology. To facilitate a discussion of how to proceed effectively in future with development of therapies for HFpEF, a meeting was facilitated by the Food and Drug Administration and included representatives from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies. This document summarizes the proceedings from this meeting.

A systematic review of diastolic stress tests in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with proposals from the EU-FP7 MEDIA study group

AIMS

Cardiac function should be assessed during stress in patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), but it is unclear how to define impaired diastolic reserve.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic review to identify which pathophysiological changes serve as appropriate targets for diagnostic imaging. We identified 38 studies of 1111 patients with HFPEF (mean age 65 years), 744 control patients without HFPEF, and 458 healthy subjects. Qualifying EF was >45-55%; diastolic dysfunction at rest was a required criterion in 45% of studies. The initial workload during bicycle exercise (25 studies) varied from 12.5 to 30 W (mean 23.1 ± 4.6), with increments of 10-25 W (mean 19.9 ± 6) and stage duration 1-5 min (mean 2.5 ± 1); targets were submaximal (n = 8) or maximal (n = 17). Other protocols used treadmill exercise, handgrip, dobutamine, lower body negative pressure, nitroprusside, fluid challenge, leg raising, or atrial pacing. Reproducibility of echocardiographic variables during stress and validation against independent reference criteria were assessed in few studies. Change in E/e' was the most frequent measurement, but there is insufficient evidence to establish this or other tests for routine use when evaluating patients with HFPEF.

CONCLUSIONS

To meet the clinical requirements of performing stress testing in elderly subjects, we propose a ramped exercise protocol on a semi-supine bicycle, starting at 15 W, with increments of 5 W/min to a submaximal target (heart rate 100-110 b.p.m., or symptoms). Measurements during submaximal and recovery stages should include changes from baseline in LV long-axis function and indirect echocardiographic indices of LV diastolic pressure.

Mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the role of abnormal peripheral oxygen extraction

BACKGROUND

Exercise capacity as measured by peak oxygen uptake (Vo2) is similarly impaired in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, characterization of how each component of Vo2 changes in response to incremental exercise in HFpEF versus HFrEF has not been previously defined. We hypothesized that abnormally low peripheral o2 extraction (arterio-mixed venous o2 content difference, [C(a-v)o2]) during exercise significantly contributes to impaired exercise capacity in HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed maximum incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic monitoring on 104 patients with symptomatic NYHA II to IV heart failure (HFpEF, n=48, peak Vo2=13.9±0.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1), mean±SEM, and HFrEF, n=56, peak Vo2=12.1±0.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) and 24 control subjects (peak Vo2 27.0±1.7 mL kg(-1) min(-1)). Peak exercise C(a-v)o2 was lower in HFpEF compared with HFrEF (11.5±0.27 versus 13.5±0.34 mL/dL, respectively, P<0.0001), despite no differences in age, hemoglobin level, peak respiratory exchange ratio, Cao2, or cardiac filling pressures. Peak C(a-v)o2 and peak heart rate emerged as the leading predictors of peak Vo2 in HFpEF. Impaired peripheral o2 extraction was the predominant limiting factor to exercise capacity in 40% of patients with HFpEF and was closely related to elevated systemic blood pressure during exercise (r=0.49, P=0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first study to directly measure C(a-v)o2 throughout exercise in HFpEF, HFrEF, and normals, we found that peak C(a-v)o2 was a major determinant of exercise capacity in HFpEF. The important functional limitation imposed by impaired o2 extraction may reflect intrinsic abnormalities in skeletal muscle or peripheral microvascular function, and represents a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

Resting ventricular-vascular function and exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a RELAX trial ancillary study

BACKGROUND

Exercise intolerance is a hallmark of heart failure, but factors associated with impaired exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are unclear. We hypothesized that in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the severity of resting ventricular and vascular dysfunction are associated with impairment in exercise tolerance as assessed by peak oxygen consumption.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction enrolled in the PhosphodiesteRasE-5 Inhibition to Improve CLinical Status And EXercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX) clinical trial (n=216) underwent baseline Doppler echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and cardiac MRI. RELAX participants were elderly (median age 69 years) and 48% were women. Ejection fraction (60%) and stroke volume (77 mL) were normal, while diastolic dysfunction (medial E/e', 16; deceleration time, 185 ms; left atrial volume, 44 mL/m(2)) and increased arterial load (arterial elastance, 1.51 mm Hg/mL) were evident. Peak oxygen consumption was reduced (11.7 mLkg(-1)min(-1), 1141 mL/min) and age, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin, and chronotropic response collectively explained 64% of the variance in raw peak oxygen consumption (mL/min). After adjustment for these variables, left ventricular structure (diastolic dimension [1.5%, P=0.008] and left ventricular mass [1.6%, P=0.008]), resting stroke volume (2.0%, P=0.002), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (deceleration time [0.9%, P=0.03] and E/e' [1.4%, P=0.009]), and arterial function (arterial elastance [2.1%, P=0.002] and systemic arterial compliance [1.5%, P=0.007]), each explained only a small additional portion of the variance in peak oxygen consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, potentially modifiable factors (obesity, anemia, and chronotropic incompetence) are strongly associated with exercise capacity, whereas resting measures of ventricular and vascular structure and function are not.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00763867.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sitaxsentan to improve impaired exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the selective endothelin type A (ETA) receptor antagonist sitaxsentan in patients who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

BACKGROUND

Fifty percent of heart failure (HF) patients have a preserved ejection fraction. No treatment has been shown to improve their clinical outcomes. Previous studies have suggested that ETA receptor antagonists might improve diastolic function and exercise tolerance in some forms of HF.

METHODS

In all, 192 HFpEF patients (EF ≥50%) were randomly assigned 2:1 to sitaxsentan 100 mg/day (n = 128) versus placebo (n = 64) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in treadmill exercise time after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary objectives included changes in left ventricular mass, transmitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity ratio, and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire, and New York Heart Association functional class. Subjects were age 65 ± 11 years, 63% female, 29% non-Caucasian, and in functional class II (56.5%) or III (43.5%).

RESULTS

Subjects treated with sitaxsentan had an increase in median treadmill time (90 s) compared with placebo-treated subjects (37 s, p = 0.0302). There was no significant treatment differences in transmitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity ratio, left ventricular mass, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire, New York Heart Association functional class, deaths, or HF hospital stay. The incidence of adverse events was similar for sitaxsentan and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In HFpEF patients, treatment with a selective ETA receptor antagonist increased exercise tolerance but did not improve any of the secondary endpoints such as left ventricular mass or diastolic function. Further studies will be necessary to determine whether ETA receptor antagonists may be useful in the treatment of HFpEF. (A Study of the Effectiveness of Sitaxsentan Sodium in Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure; NCT00303498).

Teste de esforco cardiopulmonar na insuficiencia cardiaca de fracao de ejecao normal

INTRODUÇÃO: O teste de esforço cardiopulmonar (TECP) fornece dados que orientam tratamento, prognóstico e tomadas de decisões. Entretanto, seu uso na insuficiência cardíaca de fração de ejeção normal (ICFEN) ainda não está bem esclarecido, em especial considerando novas variáveis que vêm despontando. OBJETIVOS: Comparar o comportamento das principais variáveis diagnósticas e prognósticas do TECP entre dois grupos: pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca de fração de ejeção reduzida (ICFER) e pacientes com ICFEN. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 36 pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca em classe funcional II-III da NYAH: 20 com ICFEN e 16 com ICFER do ambulatório de insuficiência cardíaca do Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (UFF). Os pacientes do Grupo ICFER selecionados foram os com FE < 35% e os do grupo ICFEN seguiram os critérios diagnósticos da Sociedade Europeia de Cardiologia de 2007. Realizou-se TECP, em esteira com protocolo de rampa, com analisador de gases VO2000. Foram aplicados teste t de Student, Mann-Whitney, teste de Fisher, modelo linear generalizado e de Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel para as análises estatísticas. RESULTADOS: O grupo ICFEN apresentou níveis mais elevados da pressão arterial em repouso, na resposta ao esforço, na potência circulatória e ventilatória, além de um maior tempo de recuperação da cinética do consumo de oxigênio. Não houve diferença em relação a outras variáveis prognósticas do TECP para o grupo ICFER. CONCLUSÕES: A pressão arterial de repouso e em esforço, a potência circulatória e ventilatória e a cinética de recuperação do VO2 (T1/2) foram as variáveis que apresentaram maior valor discriminativo entre os grupos pelo TECP.

Biomarkers of diastolic dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis: application to heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction

Comprehensive diagnostic criteria, accurate prognostic indicators, and effective treatment for patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent a critically important unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. Novel approaches to fill this unmet need are likely to be facilitated by targeting the underlying and unique pathophysiologic mechanisms that characterize patients with HFpEF. Two possible targets include hemodynamic overload evidenced by increased LV diastolic pressure (LVDP) and myocardial fibrosis evidenced by increased extracellular matrix fibrillar collagen. The measurement of LVDP and fibrosis generally requires either invasive procedures and/or complex and sophisticated imaging techniques. However, biomarkers measured in the plasma have been shown to accurately reflect changes in hemodynamic load and myocardial fibrosis and may have important application to the management of patients with HFpEF. The purpose of this review is to describe current and future applications of biomarkers in the management of patients with HFpEF.

Reduced functional measure of cardiovascular reserve predicts admission to critical care unit following kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is currently no effective preoperative assessment for patients undergoing kidney transplantation that is able to identify those at high perioperative risk requiring admission to critical care unit (CCU). We sought to determine if functional measures of cardiovascular reserve, in particular the anaerobic threshold (VO₂AT) could identify these patients.

METHODS

Adult patients were assessed within 4 weeks prior to kidney transplantation in a University hospital with a 37-bed CCU, between April 2010 and June 2012. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), echocardiography and arterial applanation tonometry were performed.

RESULTS

There were 70 participants (age 41.7±14.5 years, 60% male, 91.4% living donor kidney recipients, 23.4% were desensitized). 14 patients (20%) required escalation of care from the ward to CCU following transplantation. Reduced anaerobic threshold (VO₂AT) was the most significant predictor, independently (OR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.27-0.68; p<0.001) and in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.12-0.59; p = 0.001). The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve was 0.93, based on a risk prediction model that incorporated VO₂AT, body mass index and desensitization status. Neither echocardiographic nor measures of aortic compliance were significantly associated with CCU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective observational study to demonstrate the usefulness of CPET as a preoperative risk stratification tool for patients undergoing kidney transplantation. The study suggests that VO₂AT has the potential to predict perioperative morbidity in kidney transplant recipients.

Effects of exercise on left ventricular systolic and diastolic properties in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction versus heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to define exercise-induced changes in indices of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic properties in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), compare these changes in patients with HF and a reduced ejection fraction (EF) versus HF and a preserved EF, and compare the hemodynamic responses to activities of daily living with symptom-limited upright exercise.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects with HF and a preserved EF (n=8) and subjects with HF and a reduced EF (n=5) underwent symptom-limited Naughton protocol treadmill exercise tests. Implantable hemodynamic monitor data and echocardiographic data were obtained before exercise and at peak exercise. Implantable hemodynamic monitor data were obtained during activities of daily living during a 24-hour time period. In patients with HF and a reduced EF, limited exercise time (639±164 seconds) was associated with a marked rise in right ventricular systolic, diastolic, and estimated pulmonary artery diastolic (ePAD) pressures and an increase in LV end diastolic volume (EDV). LV systolic properties, namely EF, end systolic elastance, stroke work, and preload recruitable stroke work, all decreased. The ePAD/EDV ratio increased; to a large extent, this was dependent on an increase in EDV. By contrast, in HF and a preserved EF, limited exercise time (411±128 seconds) and the marked rise in right ventricular systolic, diastolic, and ePAD pressures were associated with no change in LV EDV. LV systolic properties increased or were unchanged; ePAD/EDV ratio increased during exercise, but the increase was independent of a change in EDV. The ranges of right ventricular systolic, diastolic, and ePAD pressures during activities of daily living were higher than the ranges of these values during the exercise stress test.

CONCLUSIONS

Although exercise limitations were similar between HF and a reduced EF and HF and a preserved EF, there were significant differences in exercise-induced changes in LV systolic and diastolic properties. These differences likely reflect the different pathophysiologies of these clinical syndromes of HF.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: relevant but underused

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a relatively old technology, but has sustained relevance for many primary care clinical scenarios in which it is, ironically, rarely considered. Advancing computer technology has made CPX easier to administer and interpret at a time when our aging population is more prone to comorbidities and higher prevalence of nonspecific symptoms of exercise intolerance and dyspnea, for which CPX is particularly useful diagnostically and prognostically. These discrepancies in application are compounded by patterns in which CPX is often administered and interpreted by cardiology, pulmonary, or exercise specialists who limit their assessments to the priorities of their own discipline, thereby missing opportunities to distinguish symptom origins. When used properly, CPX enables the physician to assess fitness and uncover cardiopulmonary issues at earlier phases of work-up, which would therefore be especially useful for primary care physicians. In this article, we provide an overview of CPX principles and testing logistics, as well as some of the clinical contexts in which it can enhance patient care.

Diuretics as pathogenetic treatment for heart failure

Increased intracardiac filling pressure or congestion causes symptoms and leads to hospital admissions in patients with heart failure, regardless of their systolic function. A history of hospital admission, in turn, predicts further hospitalizations and morbidity, and a higher number of hospitalizations determine higher mortality. Congestion is therefore the driving force of the natural history of heart failure. Congestion is the syndrome shared by heart failure with preserved and reduced systolic function. These two conditions have almost identical morbidity, mortality, and survival because the outcomes are driven by congestion. A small difference in favor of heart failure with preserved systolic function comes from decreased ejection fraction and left ventricular remodeling which is only present in heart failure with decreased systolic function. The magnitude of this difference reflects the contribution of decreased systolic function and ventricular remodeling to the progression of heart failure. The only treatment available for congestion is fluid removal via diuretics, ultrafiltration, or dialysis. It is the only treatment that works equally well for heart failure with reduced and preserved systolic function because it affects congestion, the main pathogenetic feature of the disease. Diuretics are pathogenetic therapy for heart failure.

Excess ventilation during exercise and prognosis in chronic heart failure

Excess ventilation during exercise with accompanying dyspnea is characteristic of chronic heart failure (CHF), and these patients often exhibit increased Ve relative to the Vco(2) compared with normal subjects. This can be measured in several ways, including using such variables as the slope of Ve versus Vco(2), the lowest ratio of Ve/Vco(2), and the ratio of Ve/Vco(2) at the lactic acidosis threshold or peak exercise. There is now considerable evidence that the degree of excess ventilation during exercise in patients with CHF is a robust predictor of outcome and identifies higher-risk patients requiring aggressive treatment, including heart transplantation. The mechanism of excess ventilation in patients with CHF during exercise is not completely understood. It may be related to enhanced output of chemoreceptors or peripheral muscle ergoreceptors, increased dead space/Vt ratio due to increased contribution of high ventilation-perfusion lung regions or rapid shallow breathing caused by earlier onset of lactic acidosis, or likely resulting from a combination of these causes.

Current controversies in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction is a fascinating and multifaceted condition that has provoked enormous debate and a wealth of mechanistic studies. Controversies exist with regard to its nomenclature. If its nomenclature is questioned, one can be certain the pathogenesis is ill understood. If the pathogenesis is disputed, the diagnosis becomes difficult and inconsistent. These diagnostic challenges result in inappropriate recruitment to clinical trials. Therefore, the trials may be underpowered and difficult to interpret. This paper examines contemporary theories of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction, clarifies the controversies and attempts to resolve the divergences of opinion.

The challenges associated with current clinical trials for diastolic heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diastolic heart failure (DHF) is the culmination of various cardiovascular insults, producing a proportionally greater alteration of diastolic performance, subtle reductions of systolic function and the clinical syndrome of heart failure. Over half of heart failure patients aged 65 years or older have DHF, which carries similar morbidity and mortality to systolic heart failure (SHF). The aging population and increased prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity will result in disproportionately higher incidence of DHF.

RECENT FINDINGS

To date, seven large placebo-controlled trials have been conducted in DHF and none have convincingly demonstrated substantial morbidity or mortality reductions. This review will highlight DHF clinical trial efforts and provide explanations for the discordance between clinical trial patients and clinical practice patients.

SUMMARY

Greater parity between clinical trial and clinical practice can be achieved by selecting DHF patients in the context of a few general principles: trials should enroll patients on the basis of the diagnostic criteria set forth by the European Study Group on Diastolic Heart Failure. A history of (<6 months) or current hospitalization for heart failure along with prespecified higher grades of diastolic dysfunction insures that a sufficiently at-risk population is studied. Patients with DHF are older, with multiple noncardiovascular comorbidities, and longer trial duration (>3 years) may be plagued with competing risks.

Heart failure with normal ejection fraction: consideration of mechanisms other than diastolic dysfunction

More than half of patients with heart failure (HF) have a normal ejection fraction (EF). These patients are typically elderly, are predominantly female, and have a high incidence of multiple comorbid conditions associated with development of ventricular hypertrophy and/or interstitial fibrosis. Thus, the cause of HF has been attributed to diastolic dysfunction. However, the same comorbidities may also impact myocardial systolic, ventricular, vascular, renal, and extracardiovascular properties in ways that can also contribute to symptoms of HF by way of mechanisms not related to diastolic dysfunction. Accordingly, the descriptive term HF with normal EF has been suggested as an alternative to the mechanistic term diastolic HF. In this article, we review the current understanding of nondiastolic mechanisms that may contribute to the HF with normal EF syndrome to highlight potential pathways for research that may lead to new targets for therapy.