Differential use of warfarin for secondary stroke prevention in patients with various types of atrial fibrillation

Are Older Adults Willing to Consider New Strategies to Reduce Stroke Risk?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that increases patients' risk of stroke, and determining an optimal prevention therapy is a preference-sensitive decision appropriate for shared decision making (SDM). Utilizing community-based focus groups, we explored beliefs and values around options for stroke prevention. Interview transcripts from five independent focus groups were qualitatively assessed and organized into themes. Most participants were taking a blood thinner (93%) and more than half of participants (64%) reported having AF. Few participants were familiar with newer therapies. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: (a) fearing loss of self-control through debilitating stroke, (b) recognizing uncertainty in how to weigh risks and benefits of new treatments, and (c) needing mutual respect between clinicians and patients to consider new/alternative treatment regimens. These findings help direct future research efforts examining optimal timing for SDM and decision aids to promote mutual respect.

Ischaemic stroke and bleeding rates in ‘real-world’ atrial fibrillation patients

Stroke prevention guidelines recommend oral anticoagulants (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at moderate/high risk of stroke, and antiplatelet or no therapy for those at low/moderate risk. Outcomes for AF patients receiving antiplatelet/no therapy in ‘real-life’ clinical practice were explored. This study compared clinical event rates (stroke/bleeding) for AF patients treated with OAC therapy, antiplatelets or no therapy in usual clinical practice to event rates in OAC-treated AF patients from optimally-monitored ‘real-life’ settings (anticoagulation clinics). We searched biomedical literature (1994–2010) using PubMed to identify ‘real-world’ studies of clinical event rates for AF patients receiving OAC therapy, antiplatelets, or no therapy; event rates were extracted for each treatment and setting. We identified 136 studies of thromboembolic events and 86 of bleeding events. Ischaemic stroke rates (30 studies) were higher for AF patients receiving no therapy (median: 4.45/100 person-years; range: 0.25–5.9) or antiplatelet-therapy (median: 4.45/100 person-years; range: 2.0–10) compared to OACtreated patients monitored in anticoagulation clinics (median: 1.72/100 person-years; range: 0.97–2.00), or from a non-specialized setting (median 1.66/100 person-years; range: 0–4.9). Major bleeding rates (32 studies) for patients receiving antiplatelet/no therapy were similar to OAC-treated patients from both clinical settings. As in randomised clinical trials, AF patients in ‘real-world’ clinical practice receiving antiplatelet/no therapy have higher rates of ischaemic stroke than OAC-treated patients. Antiplatelet/no therapy was associated with similar bleeding rates to OAC therapy. Increasing utilisation of anticoagulants in clinical practice could improve patient outcomes.

Analysis of geographical variations in the epidemiology and management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from the RAMSES registry

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the differences in terms of demographic characteristics and preferred stroke prevention strategies for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation living in seven geographical regions of Turkey.

METHODS

In total, 6273 patients were enrolled to this prospective, observational RAMSES study. The patients were divided into seven groups based on the geographical region of residence.

RESULTS

In terms of the geographical distribution of the overall Turkish population, the highest number of patients were enrolled from Marmara (1677, 26.7%). All demographic characteristics were significantly different among regions. Preferred oral anticoagulants (OACs) also differed between geographical regions; non-vitamin K OACs were preceded by warfarin in East Anatolia, Aegean, Southeast Anatolia, and Black Sea. Nearly one-third of the patients (28%) did not receive any OAC therapy. However, the number of patients not receiving any OAC therapy was higher in Southeast Anatolia (51.1%) and East Anatolia (46.8%) compared with other geographical regions of Turkey. Inappropriate use of OACs was also more common in East and Southeast Anatolia.

CONCLUSION

This study was the first to show that the demographic differences among the geographical regions may result in different preferences of stroke prevention strategies in Turkey. OACs are still under- or inappropriately utilized, particularly in the eastern provinces of Turkey.

Availability of patient decision aids for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is a common irregular heart rhythm that increases patients' risk of stroke. Aspirin, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants, and an implantable device can reduce this risk. Given the availability of multiple comparable options, this decision depends on patient preferences and is appropriate for the use of decision aids and other efforts to promote shared decision making. The objective of this review was to examine the existence and accessibility of, as well as select outcomes associated with, published, formally evaluated patient decision aids for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Six databases were searched from inception to March 2016 with a research librarian. Two authors independently reviewed potential articles, selected trials meeting inclusion criteria, and assessed outcome measures. Outcomes included patient knowledge, involvement, choice, and decisional conflict.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 666 articles; most were excluded for not examining stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and 7 studies were eventually included. Six decision aids displayed combinations of aspirin, warfarin, or no therapy; 1 included a direct oral anticoagulant. Interventions were associated with increased patient knowledge, increased likelihood of making a choice, and low decisional conflict. Use of decision aids in this review was associated with less selection of warfarin. None of the tested decision aids are currently available.

DISCUSSION

Published patient decision aids for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation are not accessible for clinical use. Given the availability of multiple comparable options, there is a need to develop and test new patient decision aids in this context.

The American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke development and impact on stroke care

The American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke programme has changed stroke care delivery in the USA since its establishment in 2003. GWTG is a voluntary registry and continuous quality improvement initiative that collects data on patient characteristics, hospital adherence to guidelines and inpatient outcomes. Implementation of the programme saw increased provision of evidence-based care and improved patient outcomes. This review will describe the development of the programme and discuss the impact on stroke outcomes and transformation of stroke care delivery that followed its implementation.

Clinical Evaluation of the Patient With Acute Stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the clinical evaluation of the patient with acute stroke, including key questions in the focused stroke history, important aspects of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and focused neurologic examination, and the significance of the basic head CT scan in informing a timely treatment decision.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in both stroke treatment and enhanced diagnostics support an evolving paradigm for acute stroke care, ranging from the prehospital setting to the rehabilitative setting. An international emphasis on best practice strategies promotes efficiency and standardization in stroke systems of care.

SUMMARY

Despite continual changes and augmentations to the field of acute stroke, several fundamentals remain. Central among these is in-depth knowledge of neurovascular anatomy, clinical stroke syndromes, and common mimics, which are foundational to the bedside evaluation of the patient with acute stroke.

Guideline-adherent therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in different health care settings: Results from RAMSES study

OBJECTIVE

No studies have been conducted in Turkey to compare the quality of stroke prevention therapies provided in different healthcare settings in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate possible differences between secondary (SH) and tertiary hospital (TH) settings in the effectiveness of implementing AF treatment strategies.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics of 6273 patients with non-valvular AF enrolled in the RAMSES (ReAl-life Multicentre Survey Evaluating Stroke Prevention Strategies in Turkey) study were compared.

RESULTS

Of the study population, 3312 (52.8%) patients were treated in THs and 2961 (47.2%) patients were treated in SHs. Patients treated in the SH setting were older (70.8±9.8 vs. 68.7±11.4years, p<0.001), had a lower socioeconomic status, had a higher CHA₂DS₂VASc and HASBLED scores (3.4±1.4 vs. 3.1±1.7, p<0.001 and 1.7±1.0 vs. 1.6±1.1, p<0.001 respectively), and had more comorbidities than patients treated in THs. Inappropriate oral anticoagulant use was more prevalent in SHs than THs (31.4% vs. 25.6%, p<0.001). When over- and undertreatment rates were compared among hospital types, overtreatment was more prevalent in THs (7.6% vs. 0.9%, p<0.001) while undertreatment was more common in SHs (30.5% vs. 17.9%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the marked disparity between patient groups with AF presenting at SHs and THs. The use of guideline-recommended therapy is not adequate in either type of centre, overtreatment was more prevalent in THs and undertreatment was more prevalent in SHs.

Adherence to treatment guidelines: the association between stroke risk stratified comparing CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score levels and warfarin prescription for adult patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

Ischemic stroke is a risk associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is estimated to occur five times more often in afflicted patients than in those without AF. Anti-thrombotic therapy is recommended for the prevention of ischemic stroke. Risk stratification tools, such as the CHADS₂, and more recently the CHA₂DS₂-VASc, for predicting stroke in patients with AF have been developed to determine the level of stroke risk and assist clinicians in the selection of antithrombotic therapy. Warfarin, for stroke prevention in AF, is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant in North America. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of using the CHADS₂ score levels (low and high) in contrast to the CHA₂DS₂-VASc when examining the outcome of warfarin prescriptions for adult patients with AF. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc tool was not widely used in 2010, when the data analyzed were collected. It has only been since 2014 that CHA₂DS₂-VASc criteria has been recommended to guide anticoagulant treatment in updated AF treatment guidelines.

Methods

Bivariate and multivariate data analysis strategies were used to analyze 2010 National Ambulatory Care Survey (NAMCS) data. NAMCS is designed to collect data on the use and provision of ambulatory care services nationwide. The study population for this research was US adults with a diagnosis of AF. Warfarin prescription was the dependent variable for this study. The study population was 7,669,844 AF patients.

Results

Bivariate analysis revealed that of those AF patients with a high CHADS₂ score, 25.1% had received a warfarin prescription and 18.8 for those with a high CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Logistic regression analysis yielded that patients with AF had higher odds of having a warfarin prescription if they had a high CHADS₂ score, were Caucasian, lived in a zip code where < 20% of the population had a university education, and lived in a zip code where < 10% of the population were living in households with incomes below the federal poverty level. Further, the analysis yielded that patients with AF had lesser odds of having a warfarin prescription if they were ≥ 65 years of age, female, or had health insurance.

Conclusions

Overall, warfarin appears to be under-prescribed for patients with AF regardless of the risk stratification system used. Based on the key findings of our study opportunities for interventions are present to improve guideline adherence in alignment with risk stratification for stroke prevention. Interprofessional health care teams can provide improved medical management of stroke prevention for patients with AF. These interprofessional health care teams should be constituted of primary care providers (physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners), nurses (RN, LPN), and pharmacists (PharmD, RPh).

Five years of keeping a watch on the left atrial appendage-how has the WATCHMAN fared?

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a promising site-directed therapy for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who are ineligible or contraindicated for long-term oral anticoagulation. A variety of LAAC modalities are available, including percutaneous endocardial occluder devices such as WATCHMAN^TM (Boston Scientific Corp., Marlborough, MA, USA), and an ever-increasing body of evidence is helping to define the optimal use of each technique. Similarly increased experience with LAAC has revealed challenges such as device-related thrombi and peri-device leaks for which the long-term significance and appropriate management are areas of active investigation. We review the evolution and long-term outcomes with the WATCHMAN^TM device with particular emphasis on the nuances of its use and its role in the broader landscape of appendageology.

Registries in Atrial Fibrillation: From Trials to Real-Life Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Recent improvements in atrial fibrillation diagnosis and management have prompted the initiation of various registries, predominantly to assess adherence to new guidelines but also to address the pending questions of safety and effectiveness of newly introduced management options in "real-world" clinical practice settings. In this review, we appraise antithrombotic treatment patterns for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation registries.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Science Direct, and the Cochrane databases for registries focusing on stroke thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

Registry data show that over the last decade, the proportion of patients receiving oral anticoagulation has increased (from ∼67% to >80%), whereas the proportion of those treated with aspirin only or untreated has diminished. Vitamin K antagonists are being replaced gradually by non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants as the more prevalent option. Regional and country differences in anticoagulation are evident, with its highest uptake in Europe (90.2%) and lowest in Asia (57.4%). Moreover, oral anticoagulation is given to approximately 50% of patients with no stroke risk factors, whereas more than one third of high-risk subjects are not anticoagulated but often prescribed antiplatelet therapy alone or untreated. Guideline-nonadherent thromboprophylaxis results in an increase in all-cause mortality and thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Registry data show that despite an increase in anticoagulation rates over the last decade, management gaps in stroke prevention are still evident with approximately one third of patients not treated in line with the guidelines. Mortality rates of atrial fibrillation patients remain relatively high, mostly because of the comorbid disease.

Get With The Guidelines AFIB

Background—

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It is a cause of stroke, heart failure, and death. Guideline-based treatment can improve outcomes in AF. Unfortunately, adherence to these guidelines is low. Get With The Guidelines is a hospital-based performance initiative, which has been shown to improve adherence over time. Get With The Guidelines-AFIB is a novel quality improvement registry designed to improve adherence to AF guidelines.

Methods and Results—

Hospitals will be recruited by regional American Heart Association staff and key stakeholders. Inpatients or observed patients with AF or atrial flutter will be enrolled. Data collected will include demographic, medical history, and clinical characteristics including laboratory values and treatments. Decision support will guide adherence to achievement and quality measures designed to improve adherence to anticoagulation, heart rate control, safe antiarrhythmic drug use, and patient education and follow-up. Increased adherence to guidelines will be facilitated using rapid-cycle quality improvement, site-specific reporting including national and regional benchmarks and hospital recognition for achievement. Primary analyses will include adherence to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology performance measures and guidelines. Secondary analyses will include processes of care, risk stratification, treatment of special conditions or populations and use of particular treatment techniques.

Conclusions—

AF is common clinical problem with significant morbidity and mortality. Get With The Guidelines-AFIB is a national hospital-based AF quality improvement program designed to increase adherence to evidence-based guidelines for AF.

Analysis of antithrombotic therapy after cardioembolic stroke due to atrial fibrillation or flutter

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that all patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of ischemic stroke should receive an anticoagulant. Prior analyses show that warfarin is underutilized in most populations.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use of antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter during the index hospitalization for acute, ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Retrospective electronic medical record review of 200 patients treated at a tertiary care hospital with a primary ICD-9 code for ischemic stroke and a secondary ICD-9 code for atrial fibrillation or flutter. Exclusion criteria were active bleeding, pregnancy, age less than 18, pre-existing warfarin allergy, or dabigatran use.

RESULTS

Fifty-two percent of patients received at least one dose of warfarin during the index hospitalization. There was no relationship between CHADS2 score and likelihood of receiving warfarin (P > .05). There was no significant difference in adverse event rate in patients receiving warfarin compared to those receiving aspirin (3.8% vs 9.1%; P = .14), but the rate of hemorrhagic transformation was lower in patients receiving warfarin (1% vs 7%; P = .03). The composite of hemorrhagic stroke or hemorrhagic transformation was significantly lower in patients receiving bridging therapy (0% vs 11%; P = .03). Sixteen patients were readmitted for stroke within 3 months of discharge. Ten were readmitted for ischemic stroke, 3 for hemorrhagic stroke or hemorrhagic transformation, and 3 for systemic bleeding. Ten patients (62.5%) were receiving warfarin at readmission, but only one of these patients had a therapeutic INR.

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin was underutilized as secondary stroke prophylaxis in these high-risk patients. Bridging therapy appeared to be safe and was not associated with an increase in adverse events.

Predictors of Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

The aim of the study was to assess the factors associated with the anticoagulation treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 2242 consecutive patients who had been admitted with AF on their electrocardiogram were included in the study. After excluding valvular AF, 1745 patients with nonvalvular AF were analyzed. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score [cardiac failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 (doubled), diabetes, stroke (doubled), vascular disease, age 65 -74 and sex category (female)], frequency of persistent/permanent AF, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), stroke history, body mass index, and left atrial diameter were significantly higher in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy. Stroke history, persistent/permanent AF, hypertension, DM, age, heart failure, and left atrial diameter were independent predictors of warfarin prescription. Labile international normalized ratio was the only independent negative predictor of effective treatment with warfarin. In this study, we demonstrated that stroke history, persistent/permanent AF, hypertension, DM, and left atrial diameter were positive predictors, whereas advanced age and heart failure were negative predictors of oral anticoagulant use in patients with nonvalvular AF.

Analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy after Cardioembolic Stroke Due to Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter

Background

Guidelines recommend that all patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of ischemic stroke should receive an anticoagulant. Prior analyses show that warfarin is underutilized in most populations.

Objective

To examine the use of antithrombotic and anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter during the index hospitalization for acute, ischemic stroke.

Methods

Retrospective electronic medical record review of 200 patients treated at a tertiary care hospital with a primary ICD-9 code for ischemic stroke and a secondary ICD-9 code for atrial fibrillation or flutter. Exclusion criteria were active bleeding, pregnancy, age less than 18, pre-existing warfarin allergy, or dabigatran use.

Results

Fifty-two percent of patients received at least one dose of warfarin during the index hospitalization. There was no relationship between CHADS2 score and likelihood of receiving warfarin ( P > .05). There was no significant difference in adverse event rate in patients receiving warfarin compared to those receiving aspirin (3.8% vs 9.1%; P = .14), but the rate of hemorrhagic transformation was lower in patients receiving warfarin (1% vs 7%; P = .03). The composite of hemorrhagic stroke or hemorrhagic transformation was significantly lower in patients receiving bridging therapy (0% vs 11%; P = .03). Sixteen patients were readmitted for stroke within 3 months of discharge. Ten were readmitted for ischemic stroke, 3 for hemorrhagic stroke or hemorrhagic transformation, and 3 for systemic bleeding. Ten patients (62.5%) were receiving warfarin at readmission, but only one of these patients had a therapeutic INR.

Conclusions

Warfarin was underutilized as secondary stroke prophylaxis in these high-risk patients. Bridging therapy appeared to be safe and was not associated with an increase in adverse events.

Predictors of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite warfarin's marked efficacy, not all eligible patients receive it for stroke prevention in AF. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between prescriber and/or patient characteristics and subsequent prescription of warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Observational studies conducted in the US using multivariate analysis to determine the relationship between characteristics and the odds of receiving warfarin for stroke prevention were identified in MEDLINE, EMBASE and a manual review of references. Effect estimates of prescriber and/or patient characteristics from individual studies were pooled to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies reporting results of 33 unique multivariate analyses were identified. Warfarin use across studies ranged from 9.1%-79.8% (median=49.1%). There was a moderately-strong correlation between warfarin use and year of study (r=0.60, p=0.002). Upon meta-analysis, characteristics associated with a statistically significant increase in the odds of warfarin use included history of cerebrovascular accident (OR=1.59), heart failure (OR=1.36), and male gender (OR=1.12). Those associated with a significant reduction in the odds of warfarin use included alcohol/drug abuse (OR=0.62), perceived barriers to compliance (OR=0.87), contraindication(s) to warfarin (OR=0.81), dementia (OR=0.32), falls (OR=0.60), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (OR=0.47), intracranial hemorrhage (OR=0.39), hepatic (OR=0.59), and renal impairment (OR=0.69). While age per 10-year increase (OR=0.78) and advancing age as a dichotomized variable (cut-off varied by study) (OR=0.57) were associated with significant reductions in warfarin use; qualitative review of results of studies evaluating age as a categorical variable did not confirm this relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin use has increased somewhat over time. The decision to prescribe warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is based upon multiple prescriber and patient characteristics. These findings can be used by family practice prescribers and other healthcare decision-makers to target interventions or methods to improve utilization of warfarin when it is indicated for stroke prevention.

Prevalence and predictors of warfarin use in patients with atrial fibrillation at low or intermediate risk and relation to thromboembolic events

BACKGROUND

According to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology guidelines, the choice of aspirin or warfarin to prevent thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF) should be based on the CHADS(2) score. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of warfarin use in patients with AF at low (CHADS(2) =0) or intermediate (CHADS(2) =1) risk for TEs.

HYPOTHESIS

Warfarin use is low in intermediate- and low-risk patients.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics of 3086 consecutive patients (mean age, 70 ± 13 years) with nonrheumatic AF from an academic multispecialty practice were determined between 2006 and 2008 through individual chart review. Patients were identified based on an inpatient or outpatient encounter, in which a billing diagnosis code of AF or atrial flutter (AFl) was recorded. The decision for anticoagulation was at the discretion of the primary care physician or cardiologist. No intervention to guide anticoagulant therapy was made.

RESULTS

Warfarin was prescribed in 180/497 low-risk patients (36%), and in 646/938 intermediate-risk patients (69%). Among high-risk patients (CHADS(2) ≥2), warfarin was used in 792/968 patients (82%) with a CHADS(2) = 2, in 343/410 patients (84%) with a CHADS(2) =3, and in 225/273 patients (82%) with a CHADS(2) ≥4. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of warfarin use in low-risk patients were nonparoxysmal AF (odds ratio [OR]: 5.02, P<0.0001) and age between 65 and 74 years (OR: 2.21, P<0.0001). Among intermediate-risk patients, congestive heart failure (OR: 7.34, P<0.0001), nonparoxysmal AF (OR: 4.04, P<0.0001), coronary artery disease (OR: 2.53, P<0.0001), age between 65 and 74 years (OR: 1.68, P = 0.002), and female gender (OR: 1.69, P = 0.002) were independent predictors of warfarin use. Lack of warfarin use (OR: 4.9, P<0.001) and female gender (OR: 2.0, P = 0.03) were associated with a higher risk of TEs in intermediate-risk patients. None of the CHADS(2) parameters was predictive of TEs. Warfarin was not associated with reduction in TEs in low-risk patients. Warfarin use did not have a significant effect on bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Although either aspirin or warfarin is recommended to prevent TEs in patients with AF at intermediate risk for TEs, warfarin is preferred in the majority of patients in general practice. Lack of warfarin use is associated with a higher risk of TEs in intermediate-risk patients with AF. The adoption of new oral anticoagulants that have lower risk of major hemorrhage than warfarin for low- or intermediate-risk AF patients remains to be determined.

Improvement in use of anticoagulation therapy in patients with ischemic stroke: results from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation therapy reduces thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and has a class I indication for ischemic stroke patients with AF and no contraindications. We determined the patient and hospital level characteristics associated with an increased use of anticoagulation, including participation in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) Program.

METHODS

We assessed the use of anticoagulation at hospital discharge in eligible AF patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) at 1,354 participating hospitals between April 1, 2003, and April 1, 2010.

RESULTS

Patients with AF (n = 197,778) represented 20.5% of patients with ischemic stroke/TIA. Among patients with AF, 47.6% (n = 94,119) were deemed eligible for anticoagulation, and of these, 94.0% were discharged on therapy. Older patients, African American or Hispanic patients, and those with diabetes were less likely to receive anticoagulation. Hospitals with a higher volume of patients with stroke were more likely to treat with anticoagulation. The Joint Commission Primary Stroke Centers were also more likely to treat eligible patients (odds ratio 2.16, 95% CI 1.82-2.56, P < .0001). From 2003 to 2010, contraindications to anticoagulation therapy declined from 69.7% to 28.4% (P < .0001 for trend). Anticoagulation among eligible patients improved from 88.4% to 95.2% (P < .0001) for 7 years of participation. Time in GWTG-Stroke was associated with improved anticoagulation use (adjusted odds ratio per year in program, 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.16, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of anticoagulation among stroke patients with AF has increased to very high levels overall in GWTG-Stroke over time. Future efforts should focus on improving use among selected populations.

Are the risk factors listed in warfarin prescribing information associated with anticoagulation-related bleeding? A systematic literature review

Warfarin significantly reduces thromboembolic risk, but perceptions of associated bleeding risk limit its use. The evidence supporting the association between bleeding and individual patient risks factors is unclear. This systematic review aims to determine the strength of evidence supporting an accentuated bleeding risk when patients with risk factors listed in the warfarin prescribing information are prescribed the drug. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted to identify studies reporting multivariate relationships between prespecified covariates and the risk of bleeding in patients receiving warfarin. The prespecified covariates were identified based on patient characteristics for bleeding listed in the warfarin package insert. Each covariate was evaluated for its association with specific types of bleeding. The quality of individual evaluations was rated as 'good', 'fair' or 'poor' using methods consistent with those recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Overall strength of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development (GRADE) criteria and categorised as 'insufficient', 'very low', 'low', 'moderate' or 'high'. Thirty-four studies, reporting 134 multivariate evaluations of the association between a covariate and bleeding risk were identified. The majority of evaluations had a low strength of evidence for the association between covariates and bleeding and none had a high strength of evidence. Malignancy and renal insufficiency were the only two covariates that had a moderate strength of evidence for their association with major and minor bleeding respectively. The associations between covariates listed in the warfarin prescribing information and increased bleeding risk are not well supported by the medical literature.

Secondary prevention of stroke in the elderly: a review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a major health problem with significant impact on the affected individuals and the whole community. In light of stroke being the leading cause of disability, the ageing of the population and the high incidence of stroke among the elderly, highlight the importance of primary and secondary prevention interventions among this group. The elderly generally have been underrepresented in clinical trials, creating many uncertainties and less optimal medical care for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to make evidence-based management recommendations for secondary stroke prevention in the elderly.

METHODS

Secondary prevention-related primary literature was identified using MEDLINE and PubMed (1982 to present) with combinations of the following search terms being employed: antiplatelets, aspirin, atrial fibrillation, elderly, geriatrics, hypertension, lipids, secondary prevention, statins, stroke, and warfarin. In addition, the references of these articles were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three clinical trials were included in this review, covering different aspects of secondary stroke prevention. Many of these trials were not specifically limited to the elderly, but conclusions related to their care can be derived from them. Although the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines suggest an equal benefit of aspirin, aspirin/dipyridamole, and clopidogrel in secondary prevention, the use of aspirin in the elderly may be preferred for reasons related to compliance and experience. Warfarin was largely avoided in the management of elderly stroke patients in the past, although available evidence demonstrates its efficacy and safety as a first choice for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and presumed cardiac source of emboli. Lowering blood pressure among the elderly is an important aspect of secondary stroke prevention and can be achieved with the same agents used among younger age groups with a preference for a thiazide diuretic/angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination that has proven efficacy among elderly patients. Available evidence supports the use of statins among elderly patients with history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and the derived benefit of treatment does not differ significantly from that in the younger age group. Elderly patients with 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis and history of stroke or TIA should be considered for early carotid endarterectomy to reduce recurrent stroke.

CONCLUSION

Age should not be considered a barrier for the provision of optimal secondary prevention interventions. The available evidence supports similar and sometimes superior derived benefit from secondary preventive stroke measures in the elderly compared with that seen in younger patients.

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and use of antithrombotics in hypertensive patients aged >or=65 years. The FAPRES trial

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Age and arterial hypertension are two of the main factors associated with atrial fibrillation and an increased risk of embolism. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and the extent of antithrombotic use in hypertensive patients aged >or=65 years in the Spanish region of Valencia.

METHODS

Each study investigator enrolled the first three hypertensive patients aged >or=65 years who came for a consultation on the first day of each week for 5 weeks. Each patient's risk factors, history of cardiovascular disease, CHADS2 score and medical treatment were noted and an ECG was recorded. Data were analyzed centrally. A patient was regarded as having atrial fibrillation if it was observable on the ECG or reported in medical records.

RESULTS

The study included 1,028 hypertensive patients with a mean age of 72.8 years. Overall, 10.3% had atrial fibrillation: in 6.7%, it was observable on the ECG while 3.6% were in sinus rhythm but had a history of the condition. Factors associated with atrial fibrillation were age, alcohol intake, structural heart disease and glomerular filtration rate. In total, 76.2% of patients with ECG evidence of atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score >1 were taking anticoagulants compared with 41.7% of those who had a history of the condition but were currently in sinus rhythm.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in our group of hypertensives was 10.3%; in 1.7%, it was previously undiagnosed. Antithrombotic use was high in patients with current atrial fibrillation, but lower in those who had experienced an episode previously.

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and use of antithrombotics in hypertensive patients aged >or=65 years. The FAPRES trial

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Age and arterial hypertension are two of the main factors associated with atrial fibrillation and an increased risk of embolism. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and the extent of antithrombotic use in hypertensive patients aged >or=65 years in the Spanish region of Valencia.

METHODS

Each study investigator enrolled the first three hypertensive patients aged >or=65 years who came for a consultation on the first day of each week for 5 weeks. Each patient's risk factors, history of cardiovascular disease, CHADS2 score and medical treatment were noted and an ECG was recorded. Data were analyzed centrally. A patient was regarded as having atrial fibrillation if it was observable on the ECG or reported in medical records.

RESULTS

The study included 1,028 hypertensive patients with a mean age of 72.8 years. Overall, 10.3% had atrial fibrillation: in 6.7%, it was observable on the ECG while 3.6% were in sinus rhythm but had a history of the condition. Factors associated with atrial fibrillation were age, alcohol intake, structural heart disease and glomerular filtration rate. In total, 76.2% of patients with ECG evidence of atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score >1 were taking anticoagulants compared with 41.7% of those who had a history of the condition but were currently in sinus rhythm.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in our group of hypertensives was 10.3%; in 1.7%, it was previously undiagnosed. Antithrombotic use was high in patients with current atrial fibrillation, but lower in those who had experienced an episode previously.

Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation is a common and from a neurological perspective the most significant cardiac arrhythmia with a growing world-wide incidence. It also carries a significant associated morbidity and mortality, with cardioembolic strokes arguably being the most disabling sequelae. This brief review will highlight the important studies and the latest treatment modalities available for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Are atrial fibrillation patients receiving warfarin in accordance with stroke risk?

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter provide recommendations for anticoagulation based on patients' overall risk of stroke. To determine the real-world compliance of physicians with these recommendations, we conducted a retrospective cohort study examining the utilization of warfarin in atrial fibrillation/flutter patients by stroke risk level.

METHODS

Patients with a qualifying atrial fibrillation/flutter diagnosis during > or =18 months' continuous enrollment between January 2003 and September 2007, and with > or =6 months' eligibility after the first atrial fibrillation/flutter diagnosis, were identified from the US MarketScan database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY). Warfarin use within 30 days of the first diagnosis was assessed according to stroke risk, estimated using the Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 years, Diabetes, Stroke (CHADS(2)) score.

RESULTS

Of 171,393 patients included in the analysis, 20.0% had a CHADS(2) score of 0 (low risk), 61.6% a score of 1-2 (moderate risk), and 18.4% a score of 3-6 (high risk). Warfarin, recommended for high stroke-risk patients, was given to only 42.1% of those with a CHADS(2) score of 3-6. A similar percentage of patients with moderate (43.5%) or low stroke risk (40.1%) received warfarin. Only 29.6% of high-risk, 33.3% of moderate-risk, and 34.1% of low-risk patients who were started on warfarin received uninterrupted therapy for 6 months following their initial prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that guideline recommendations that anticoagulation should be provided in accordance with stroke risk in atrial fibrillation patients are not routinely followed in clinical practice. The causes and clinical implications of under-utilization of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients with high stroke risk warrant further study.

Patient characteristics associated with the choice of triple antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndromes

Evidence regarding the use of dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation (i.e., triple therapy) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is limited. We evaluated the characteristics associated with the choice of triple therapy in ACS. Using the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) Coronary Artery Disease national registry, we studied patients with ACS at 361 sites in the United States from 2004 to 2007. Both univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to assess the factors associated using triple therapy on discharge. The Generalized Estimating Equation method was used to account for within-hospital clustering in modeling. A total of 86,304 patients presented with ACS during the study period. At discharge, 3,933 patients (4.6%) were prescribed triple therapy, 60,716 patients (70.4%) received dual antiplatelet therapy, 2,348 patients (2.7%) received single antiplatelet therapy plus oral anticoagulation, 19,065 patients (22.1%) received antiplatelet monotherapy, and 242 patients (0.3%) received oral anticoagulation alone. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 7.01, 95% confidence interval 6.06 to 8.12; p <0.001), documented new-onset atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 3.76, 95% confidence interval 2.87 to 4.93; p <0.001), or history of atrial flutter (odds ratio 3.38, 95% confidence interval 2.15 to 5.32; p <0.001) were more frequently discharged with triple therapy. In conclusion, for patients with ACS, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter were most strongly associated with the use of triple therapy; however, this therapy was used less often than dual or single antiplatelet therapy.