Erythropoietin to augment myocardial salvage induced by coronary thrombolysis in patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

Efficacy of IntraCoronary Erythropoietin Delivery BEfore Reperfusion-Gauging Infarct Size in Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ICEBERG)

Previous clinical studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the effect of erythropoietin in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study investigated whether directed intracoronary infusion of darbepoetin-α into ischemic myocardium before reperfusion would reduce infarct size or post-infarct remodeling in STEMI patients.Eighty STEMI patients received one of the following treatments simultaneously with the first balloon inflation: intracoronary darbepoetin-α 300 μg (n = 40) or saline (n = 40), administered via the over-the-wire balloon system. The primary endpoint was infarct size estimated by serial cardiac enzyme levels after procedure. The secondary endpoints were (1) infarct size and proportion of salvaged myocardium measured with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at baseline; (2) post-infarct remodeling (PIR), defined as an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume more than 20% at 4 months compared to the baseline on CMR; and (3) composite cardiovascular endpoints assessed at 4 months.The peak CK-MB [median 270.0 (interquartile range 139.8-356.3) versus 231.5 (131.0-408.5) ng/mL, P = 0.55] and troponin-I [128.5 (63.5-227.8) versus 109.0 (43.8-220.0) ng/mL, P = 0.52) ] did not differ between the darbepoetin-α and control group. Fifty-seven patients completed the baseline and 4-month follow-up CMR. There were no differences in infarct size [30.6 (18.1-49.8) versus 31.5 (22.5-47.3) cm³, P = 0.91), proportion of salvaged myocardium [26.7% (15.9-42.6%) versus 35.8% (22.4-48.8%), P = 0.12) or PIR (8.0% versus 6.7%, P = 0.62) between the two groups. Composite cardiovascular outcomes did not differ between the two groups.In conclusion, administration of intracoronary darbepoetin-α before reperfusion did not reduce infarct size or post-infarct remodeling in STEMI patients.

Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a common problem experienced by critically-ill people. Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been used as a pharmacologic strategy when the blunted response of endogenous erythropoietin has been reported in critically-ill people. The use of ESAs becomes more important where adverse clinical outcomes of transfusing blood products is a limitation. However, this indication for ESAs is not licensed by regulatory authorities and is called off-label use. Recent studies concern the harm of ESAs in a critical care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To focus on harms in assessing the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), alone or in combination, compared with placebo, no treatment or a different active treatment regimen when administered off-label to critically-ill people.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO via OvidSP, CINAHL, all evidence-based medicine (EBM) reviews including IPA and SCI-Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, BIOSIS Previews and TOXLINE up to February 2017. We also searched trials registries, checked reference lists of relevant studies and tracked their citations by using SciVerse Scopus.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies, which compared scheduled systemic administration of ESAs versus other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically-ill people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened and evaluated the eligibility of retrieved records, extracted data and assessed the risks of bias and quality of the included studies. We resolved differences in opinion by consensus or by involving a third review author. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. We used fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity between studies. We fitted three-level hierarchical Bayesian models to calculate overall treatment effect estimates.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 27,865 records identified, 39 clinical trials and 14 observational studies, including a total of 945,240 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Five studies are awaiting classification. Overall, we found 114 adverse events in 33 studies (30 RCTs and three observational studies), and mortality was reported in 41 studies (32 RCTs and nine observational studies). Most studies were at low to moderate risk of bias for harms outcomes. However, overall harm assessment and reporting were of moderate to low quality in the RCTs, and of low quality in the observational studies. We downgraded the GRADE quality of evidence for venous thromboembolism and mortality to very low and low, respectively, because of risk of bias, high inconsistency, imprecision and limitations of study design.It is unclear whether there is an increase in the risk of any adverse events (Bayesian risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.21; 3099 participants; 9 studies; low-quality evidence) or venous thromboembolism (Bayesian RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.41; 18,917 participants; 18 studies; very low-quality evidence).There was a decreased risk of mortality with off-label use of ESAs in critically-ill people (Bayesian RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; 930,470 participants; 34 studies; low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low quality of evidence suggests that off-label use of ESAs may reduce mortality in a critical care setting. There was a lack of high-quality evidence about the harm of ESAs in critically-ill people. The information for biosimilar ESAs is less conclusive. Most studies neither evaluated ESAs' harm as a primary outcome nor predefined adverse events. Any further studies of ESA should address the quality of evaluating, recording and reporting of adverse events.

The Erythropoietin System Protects the Heart Upon Injury by Cardiac Progenitor Cell Activation

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a growth hormone, widely known for its role in erythropoiesis. The broad expression of erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) in adult organs suggested that EPO may also affect other cells besides late erythroid progenitors. In the embryonic heart, EPOR is expressed in all cells including the immature proliferating cardiomyocytes. In contrast to the embryonic heart in adulthood, EPOR expression is decreased and mainly detected in immature proliferating cells (i.e., resident cardiac progenitor cells) rather than in terminally differentiated cells (i.e., cardiomyocytes). Since cardiac progenitor cells are considered a regenerative cell source upon cardiac injury, the protective action of the EPO system was tested by creating an erythroid-rescued EPOR knockout mouse model. Although these mice appear to have less immature proliferating myocytes during embryogenesis, they reach adulthood without apparent morphological defects. However, upon ischemia reperfusion, these animals show a greater infarct size, suggesting that the EPO/EPOR protects the heart upon injury. Indeed preclinical studies showed that EPO administration postinfarction improves cardiac function via neoangiogenesis, antiapoptotic mechanisms, and/or CPC activation. Despite the promising preclinical data, large cohort clinical studies in humans failed to show a significant amelioration in cardiac function upon systemic injection of EPO in patients with myocardial infarctions. The discrepancy between preclinical and clinical trials may be due to differences between the doses, the way of delivery, the homogeneity of the cohorts, and last but not least the species differences. These data pinpoint the importance of carrying out preclinical studies in human models of disease as engineered human cardiac tissue that will provide a better understanding of the expression pattern of EPOR and the role of its ligand in human cardiac cells. Such studies may be able to bridge the gap between preclinical rodent data and human clinical trials and thus lead to the design of more successful clinical studies.

Baseline Hemoglobin Levels Associated with One-Year Mortality in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

BACKGROUND

The association between hemoglobin (Hb) levels and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the mortality among STEMI patients with anemia or erythrocytosis, and further establish the relationship between mortality and the increment of Hb level.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2012, 951 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a medical center in Northern Taiwan were enrolled in our study, including 535 patients with normal Hb level, 148 with anemia (male Hb ≤ 13 g/dl, female ≤ 12) and 268 with erythrocytosis (male Hb ≥ 16, female ≥ 15).

RESULTS

Patients in the anemia group were the oldest, and had higher morbidity than the normal Hb group, followed by the erythrocytosis group. In regression analyses, neither anemia nor erythrocytosis was associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality. Each 1-g/dl increment of Hb level was not associated with 30-day mortality both in patients with anemia or erythrocytosis. However, it was associated with a decreased risk of 1-year mortality in anemic patients [hazard ratio (HR): 0.756, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.608-0.938, p = 0.011] and an increased risk of 1-year mortality in those with erythrocytosis (HR: 2.086, 95%CI: 1.106-3.937, p = 0.023). In multivariate analysis, each 1-g/dl increment of Hb level was associated with 1-year mortality both in anemic patients and those with erythrocytosis (HR: 0.788, 95%CI: 0.621-0.999, p = 0.049; HR: 2.302, 95%CI: 1.051-5.04, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher hemoglobin levels in STEMI patients with anemia were associated with decreased risks of 1-year mortality, whereas higher hemoglobin levels in those with erythrocytosis were associated with increased risks of one-year mortality.

Functional EpoR pathway utilization is not detected in primary tumor cells isolated from human breast, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and ovarian tumor tissues

Several clinical trials in oncology have reported increased mortality or disease progression associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. One hypothesis proposes that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents directly stimulate tumor proliferation and/or survival through cell-surface receptors. To test this hypothesis and examine if human tumors utilize the erythropoietin receptor pathway, the response of tumor cells to human recombinant erythropoietin was investigated in disaggregated tumor cells obtained from 186 patients with colorectal, breast, lung, ovarian, head and neck, and other tumors. A cocktail of well characterized tumor growth factors (EGF, HGF, and IGF-1) were analyzed in parallel as a positive control to determine whether freshly-isolated tumor cells were able to respond to growth factor activation ex vivo. Exposing tumor cells to the growth factor cocktail resulted in stimulation of survival and proliferation pathways as measured by an increase in phosphorylation of the downstream signaling proteins AKT and ERK. In contrast, no activation by human recombinant erythropoietin was observed in isolated tumor cells. Though tumor samples exhibited a broad range of cell-surface expression of EGFR, c-Met, and IGF-1R, no cell-surface erythropoietin receptor was detected in tumor cells from the 186 tumors examined (by flow cytometry or Western blot). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents did not act directly upon isolated tumor cells to stimulate pathways known to promote proliferation or survival of human tumor cells isolated from primary and metastatic tumor tissues.

Administration of erythropoietin in patients with myocardial infarction: does it make sense? An updated and comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine protective effects of erythropoietin on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Medline, Embase, Elsevier and Sciences online database as well as Google scholar literature were used for selecting appropriate studies with randomized controlled design. The effect sizes measured were odds ratio (OR) for categorical variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of duration of hospitalization in intervention and control groups. Values of P<0.1 for Q test or I(2)>50% indicated significant heterogeneity between the studies. The literature searches of all major databases retrieved 973 studies. After screening, a total of 15 trials that reported outcomes were identified. Pooled analysis was performed on left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD of -0.047; 95% CI: -0.912 to 0.819; P=0.9), left ventricular end diastolic volume (WMD of -0.363; 95% CI: -3.902 to 3.175; P=0.8), left ventricular end systolic volume (WMD of 0.346; 95% CI: -2.533 to 3.226; P=0.8), infarct size (WMD of -0.446; 95% CI: -2.352 to -1.460; P=0.6), stroke (OR of 2.1; 95% CI: 0.58 to 7.54; P=0.2), re-myocardial infarction (OR of 1.06; 95% CI: 0.52 to 2.185; P=0.8), heart failure (OR of 0.53; 95% CI: 0.259 to 1.105; P=0.09), mortality (OR of 0.56; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.19; P=0.13), thrombosis (OR of 0.774; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.45; P=0.4), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR of 0.926; 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.35; P=0.6). Short-term administration of EPO in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing PCI does not result in improvement in cardiac function, reduction of infarct size and all-cause mortality. Low dose EPO therapy may not be the choice of treatment for the patients with MI, while higher doses might be more effective.

High-dose erythropoietin for tissue protection

BACKGROUND

The discovery of potential anti-apoptotic and cytoprotective effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has led to clinical trials investigating the use of high-dose, short-term rHuEPO therapy for tissue protection in conditions such as stroke and myocardial infarction. Experimental studies have been favourable, but the clinical efficacy has yet to be validated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have reviewed clinical studies regarding the use of high-dose, short-term rHuEPO therapy for tissue protection in humans with the purpose to detail the safety and efficacy of rHuEPO for this indication. A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE database for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

RESULTS

Twenty-six randomized controlled trials that enrolled 3176 patients were included. The majority of trials (20 trials including 2724 patients) reported no effect of rHuEPO therapy on measures of tissue protection. Five trials including 1025 patients reported safety concerns in the form of increased mortality or adverse event rates. No studies reported reduced mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is sparse to support a tissue-protective benefit of rHuEPO in humans. Moreover, a number of studies indicate that short-term administration of high-dose rHuEPO is associated with an increased risk of mortality and serious adverse events. Further work is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of toxicity of rHuEPO in humans.

Erythropoietin in cardiac disease: effective or harmful?

Discovered as the primary regulator of erythropoiesis, erythropoietin (EPO) is involved in a broad variety of processes that play a major role in cardiovascular diseases. In particular, the antiapoptotic and pro-angiogenic properties of EPO have prompted a growing interest in the use of EPO for the treatment of myocardial infarction and heart failure. In a variety of myocardial ischemic injury animal models, EPO administration has been shown to acutely reduce infarct size, thereby preserving ventricular function. In addition, cardiac long-term effects of EPO, such as prevention of ventricular remodeling and heart failure, have been described. In recent years, several trials have tested the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) administration in patients with myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure, in the attempt to translate the cardioprotection found in experimental models to human patients. In view of the generally controversial findings, in this updated review we provide an overview of the results of the most recent trials that investigated the role of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), including rhEPO and its analogue darbepoetin, in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. The problems related to safety and tolerability of ESA therapy are also discussed. Our analysis of the available literature demonstrates that the results of clinical studies in patients with cardiac disease are not uniform and the conclusions are contradictory. Further larger prospective studies are required to test clinical efficacy and safety of EPO.

Erythropoietin and the heart: physiological effects and the therapeutic perspective

Erythropoietin (Epo) has been thought to act exclusively on erythroid progenitor cells. The identification of Epo receptor (EpoR) in non-haematopoietic cells and tissues including neurons, astrocytes, microglia, immune cells, cancer cell lines, endothelial cells, bone marrow stromal cells, as well as cells of myocardium, reproductive system, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, pancreas and skeletal muscle indicates that Epo has pleiotropic actions. Epo shows signals through protein kinases, anti-apoptotic proteins and transcription factors. In light of interest of administering recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEpo) and its analogues for limiting infarct size and left ventricular (LV) remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in humans, the foremost studies utilising rhEpo are reviewed. The putative mechanisms involved in Epo-induced cardioprotection are related to the antiapoptotic, anti-inflammatory and angiogenic effects of Epo. Thus, cardioprotective potentials of rhEpo are reviewed in this article by focusing on clinical applicability. An overview of non-haematopoietic Epo analogues, which are a reliable alternative to the classic EpoR agonists and may prevent undesired side effects, is also provided.

High-dose erythropoietin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

We sought to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the potential influence of high-dose erythropoietin (EPO) on cardiac function parameters in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

By searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to December 2012), seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting cardiac functional parameters with a total of 1,250 acute STEMI patients were identified. When applied to patients with acute STEMI, high-dose EPO was relatively safe and no increase in all-caused death and severe adverse effects were indicated. Estimates were pooled from fixed or random effects models. Compared with controls, high-dose EPO resulted in a slight but significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction of 1.02 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.17-1.88, P = 0.019, I (2) = 0 %] and an improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume of -4.61 ml (95 % CI -7.64 to -1.58, P = 0.003, I (2) = 27.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggested that high-dose EPO has limited cardio-protective effects in patients with STEMI. However, considering the relatively short follow-up durations and small patient populations in the current RCTs, the effects of high-dose EPO on clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI need to be evaluated in larger prospective RCTs of longer duration.

Safety of off-label erythropoiesis stimulating agents in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are used to treat anemia in critically ill patients. This indication is off-label, because it is not licensed by regulatory authorities. Recently ESAs were suspected to harm critically ill patients. Our objective was to assess the safety of ESAs in off-label indications in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Eleven databases were searched up to April 2012. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies in any language that compared off-label ESAs treatment with other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically ill patients. Two authors independently screened and evaluated retrieved records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of reporting.

RESULTS

We used frequentist and Bayesian models to combine studies, and performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses. From 12,888 citations, we included 48 studies (34 RCTs; 14 observational), involving 944,856 participants. Harm reporting was of medium to low quality. There was no statistically significant increased risk of adverse events in general, serious adverse events, the most frequently reported adverse events, and death in critically ill patients treated with ESAs. These results were robust against risk of bias and analysis methods. There is evidence that ESAs increase the risk of clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events, and there is some less certain evidence that ESAs might increase the risk for venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, administration of ESAs is associated with a significant increase in clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events but not with other frequently reported adverse events and death.

Mitochondrial pathways, permeability transition pore, and redox signaling in cardioprotection: therapeutic implications

Reperfusion therapy is the indispensable treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and must be applied as soon as possible to attenuate the ischemic insult. However, reperfusion is responsible for additional myocardial damage likely involving opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP). A great part of reperfusion injury occurs during the first minute of reperfusion. The prolonged opening of mPTP is considered one of the endpoints of the cascade to myocardial damage, causing loss of cardiomyocyte function and viability. Opening of mPTP and the consequent oxidative stress due to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) are considered among the major mechanisms of mitochondrial and myocardial dysfunction. Kinases and mitochondrial components constitute an intricate network of signaling molecules and mitochondrial proteins, which interact in response to stressors. Cardioprotective pathways are activated by stimuli such as preconditioning and postconditioning (PostC), obtained with brief intermittent ischemia or with pharmacological agents, which drastically reduce the lethal ischemia/reperfusion injury. The protective pathways converging on mitochondria may preserve their function. Protection involves kinases, adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels, ROS signaling, and the mPTP modulation. Some clinical studies using ischemic PostC during angioplasty support its protective effects, and an interesting alternative is pharmacological PostC. In fact, the mPTP desensitizer, cyclosporine A, has been shown to induce appreciable protections in AMI patients. Several factors and comorbidities that might interfere with cardioprotective signaling are considered. Hence, treatments adapted to the characteristics of the patient (i.e., phenotype oriented) might be feasible in the future.

Myocardial infarction: cardioprotection by erythropoietin

Extensive research during the last decade demonstrated that a single systemic administration of -erythropoietin (EPO) lead to significant attenuation of myocardial infarction (MI) induced in animals, mostly small rodents, either by a myocardial ischemia followed by reperfusion or by a permanent ligation of a coronary artery. Both methods are critically reviewed with the aim of helping the reader in appreciating key issues in the translation of experimental results to the clinic. Results of several clinical trials in patients with acute MI completed to date failed to demonstrate beneficial effects of EPO, and thus put into question the validity of results obtained in animal models. Comprehensive review of design and results of animal experiments and clinical trials presented here allowed authors to postulate that therapeutic window for EPO during developing MI is very narrow and was possibly missed in negative clinical trials. This point was illustrated by the negative outcome of experiment in the rat model of MI in which timing of EPO administration was similar to that in clinical trials. The design of future clinical trials should allow for a narrow therapeutic window of EPO. Given current standards for onset-to-door and door-to-balloon time the optimal time for EPO administration should be just prior to PCI.

The nephroprotective properties of recombinant human erythropoietin in kidney transplantation: experimental facts and clinical proofs

Adaptive responses to hypoxia, including hypoxia-inducible factor signaling, allow the cell to satisfy its basal metabolic demand and avoid death, but these responses can also be deleterious by promoting inflammation, cell dedifferentiation and fibrogenesis. Therefore, targeting hypoxia constitutes a promising therapeutic avenue. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) appeared as a good candidate therapy because its hematopoietic properties could reverse anemia, and its tissue-protective properties could reduce cell death and limit maladaptive cellular responses to hypoxia. Despite experimental evidence on the nephroprotecive properties of rhEPO, recent clinical trials provided evidence that rhEPO was ineffective in preventing delayed graft function after ischemic acute injury but that the normalization of hemoglobin values preserved kidney function deterioration and reduced graft loss. Our aim here is to provide a survey of the rationale for evaluating the administration of rhEPO in the setting of kidney transplantation. We will discuss the intriguing findings that emerged from the clinical trials and the discrepancies between promising experimental results and negative clinical studies, as well as the differences in terms of the benefits and safety profiles of the normalization of hemoglobin values in chronic kidney disease patients and kidney transplant patients.

Erythropoietin treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

In experimental models of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), erythropoietin (EPO) reduces infarct size and improves left ventricular (LV) function. However, in the clinical setting, the effect of EPO in AMI was unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EPO to explore the safety and therapeutic effects of EPO in patients with AMI.

METHODS

We identified reports of RCTs comparing EPO to placebo for AMI in adult humans in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, cardiac function by LV ejection fraction and infarct size.

RESULTS

We included 13 articles of RCTs with data for 1,564 patients. Erythropoietin therapy did not improve LV ejection fraction (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.33, 95% CI -1.90 to 1.24, P = .68) and had no effect on infarct size, as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (WMD -0.12, -2.16 to 1.91, P = .90) or serum peak value of creatine kinase-MB (WMD -2.01, -25.70 to 21.68, P = .87). Erythropoietin treatment did not decrease the risk of total adverse cardiac events (relative risk [RR] 1.02, 0.65-1.61, P = .92). Erythropoietin treatment also failed to decrease the risk of heart failure (RR, 0.69, 0.27-1.72, P = .42) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.55, 0.22-1.33, P = .18). Moreover, EPO had no effect on the risk of stent thrombosis (RR, 0.69, 0.29-1.64, P = .40).

CONCLUSION

Erythropoietin in patients with AMI seems to have no clinical benefit for heart function or reducing infarct size, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Erythropoietin may not be a choice for patients with AMI.

Targeting reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction: a review of reperfusion injury pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (secondary to lethal ischemia-reperfusion [IR]) contributes to much of the mortality and morbidity from ischemic heart disease. Currently, the treatment for AMI is early reperfusion; however, this itself contributes to the final myocardial infarct size, in the form of what has been termed 'lethal reperfusion injury'. Over the last few decades, the discovery of the phenomena of ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning, as well as remote preconditioning and remote postconditioning, along with significant advances in our understanding of the cardioprotective pathways underlying these phenomena, have provided the possibility of successful mechanical and pharmacological interventions against reperfusion injury.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the evidence from clinical trials evaluating pharmacological agents as adjuncts to standard reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation AMI.

EXPERT OPINION

Reperfusion injury pharmacotherapy has moved from bench to bedside, with clinical evaluation and ongoing clinical trials providing us with valuable insights into the shortcomings of current research in establishing successful treatments for reducing reperfusion injury. There is a need to address some key issues that may be leading to lack of translation of cardioprotection seen in basic models to the clinical setting. These issues are discussed in the Expert opinion section.

Effect of high-dose erythropoietin on graft function after kidney transplantation: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with adverse long-term outcomes after deceased-donor kidney (DDK) transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injury plays a crucial role in the development of DGF. On the basis of promising animal data, this study evaluated any potential benefits of erythropoietin-alfa (EPO-α) given intra-arterially at the time of reperfusion of renal allograft on the degree of allograft function, as well as tubular cell injury measured by urinary biomarkers in the early post-transplant period.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the influence of EPO-α administered intraoperatively on the outcomes of DDK transplantations performed at the study center between March 2007 and July 2009.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were randomly assigned to EPO-α (n=36) or placebo (n=36). The incidences of DGF, slow graft function, and immediate graft function did not significantly differ between the treatment and control groups (41.7% versus 47.2%, 25.0% versus 36.1%, and 33.3% versus 16.7%, respectively; P=0.24). The groups had similar levels of urinary biomarkers, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and IL-18 at multiple times points soon after transplantation; urinary output during the first 3 postoperative days; 1-month renal function; and BP readings, hemoglobin, and adverse effects during the first month.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not show any clinically demonstrable beneficial effects of high-dose EPO-α given intra-arterially during the early reperfusion phase in DDK transplant recipients in terms of reducing the incidence of DGF or improving short-term allograft function.

The effect of erythropoietin on normal and neoplastic cells

Erythropoietin (Epo) is an essential hormone that binds and activates the Epo receptor (EpoR) resident on the surface of erythroid progenitor cells, thereby promoting erythropoiesis. Recombinant human erythropoietin has been used successfully for over 20 years to treat anemia in millions of patients. In addition to erythropoiesis, Epo has also been reported to have other effects, such as tissue protection and promotion of tumor cell growth or survival. This became of significant concern in 2003, when some clinical trials in cancer patients reported increased tumor progression and worse survival outcomes in patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). One of the potential mechanisms proffered to explain the observed safety issues was that functional EpoR was expressed in tumors and/or endothelial cells, and that ESAs directly stimulated tumor growth and/or antagonized tumor ablative therapies. Since then, numerous groups have performed further research evaluating this potential mechanism with conflicting data and conclusions. Here, we review the biology of endogenous Epo and EpoR expression and function in erythropoiesis, and evaluate the evidence pertaining to the expression of EpoR on normal nonhematopoietic and tumor cells.

Did clinical trials in which erythropoietin failed to reduce acute myocardial infarct size miss a narrow therapeutic window?

BACKGROUND

To test a hypothesis that in negative clinical trials of erythropoietin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) the erythropoietin (rhEPO) could be administered outside narrow therapeutic window. Despite overwhelming evidence of cardioprotective properties of rhEPO in animal studies, the outcomes of recently concluded phase II clinical trials have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of rhEPO in patients with acute MI. However, the time between symptoms onset and rhEPO administration in negative clinical trials was much longer that in successful animal experiments.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

MI was induced in rats either by a permanent ligation of a descending coronary artery or by a 2-hr occlusion followed by a reperfusion. rhEPO, 3000 IU/kg, was administered intraperitoneally at the time of reperfusion, 4 hrs after beginning of reperfusion, or 6 hrs after permanent occlusion. MI size was measured histologically 24 hrs after coronary occlusion. The area of myocardium at risk was similar among groups. The MI size in untreated rats averaged ~42% of area at risk, or ~24% of left ventricle, and was reduced by more than 50% (p<0.001) in rats treated with rhEPO at the time of reperfusion. The MI size was not affected by treatment administered 4 hrs after reperfusion or 6 hrs after permanent coronary occlusion. Therefore, our study in a rat experimental model of MI demonstrates that rhEPO administered within 2 hrs of a coronary occlusion effectively reduces MI size, but when rhEPO was administered following a delay similar to that encountered in clinical trials, it had no effect on MI size.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

The clinical trials that failed to demonstrate rhEPO efficacy in patients with MI may have missed a narrow therapeutic window defined in animal experiments.

Endogenous serum erythropoietin and no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

In models of acute ischaemia, erythropoietin (EPO) administration has been found to attenuate vascular injury largely through reduced apoptosis, suppressed inflammation and increased nitric oxide availability. We studied the association between circulating endogenous EPO and no-reflow in patients with first ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

METHODS

Blood sampling was performed before PPCI. Consecutive patients with (n = 24) or without (n = 24) evidence of angiographic no-reflow after PPCI were enrolled. Angiographic no-reflow was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow ≤ 2 or as TIMI flow = 3 but with myocardial blush grade < 2. We also assessed electrocardiographic (ECG) no-reflow as ≤ 50% resolution of maximal ST elevation 60 min after PPCI.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not correlate significantly with EPO concentrations. In contrast, both angiographic and ECG no-reflow correlated with lower EPO levels at univariate analysis [median (interquartile): 4·2 (0·6-9·5) vs. 12·2 (5·2-20·3) mIU mL(-1), P = 0·001, and 4·0 (0·6-7·1) vs. 9·3 (1·0-12·6) mIU mL(-1), P = 0·01, respectively]. At multivariable analysis, decreasing EPO tertiles and left anterior descending as the infarct-related artery were the only factors that predicted both angiographic and ECG no-reflow (P = 0·017 and P = 0·02 for EPO; P < 0·005 and P > 0·05 for left anterior descending artery, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an independent, graded, inverse relation between endogenous EPO levels and angiographic and ECG no-reflow following PPCI. In animal models of ischaemia, EPO has been found to be protective. In humans, endogenous EPO may contribute to offset the mechanisms responsible for no-reflow.

Hematopoietic cytokines for cardiac repair: mobilization of bone marrow cells and beyond

Hematopoietic cytokines, traditionally known to influence cellular proliferation, differentiation, maturation, and lineage commitment in the bone marrow, include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, stem cell factor, Flt-3 ligand, and erythropoietin among others. Emerging evidence suggests that these cytokines also exert multifarious biological effects on diverse nonhematopoietic organs and tissues. Although the precise mechanisms remain unclear, numerous studies in animal models of myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure indicate that hematopoietic cytokines confer potent cardiovascular benefits, possibly through mobilization and subsequent homing of bone marrow-derived cells into the infarcted heart with consequent induction of myocardial repair involving multifarious mechanisms. In addition, these cytokines are also known to exert direct cytoprotective effects. However, results from small-scale clinical trials of G-CSF therapy as a single agent after acute MI have been discordant and largely disappointing. It is likely that cardiac repair following cytokine therapy depends on a number of known and unknown variables, and further experimental and clinical studies are certainly warranted to accurately determine the true therapeutic potential of such therapy. In this review, we discuss the biological features of several key hematopoietic cytokines and present the basic and clinical evidence pertaining to cardiac repair with hematopoietic cytokine therapy.

Development of an in vitro model of myotube ischemia

Critical limb ischemia causes severe damage to the skeletal muscle. This study develops a reproducible model of myotube ischemia by simulating, in vitro, the critical parameters that occur in skeletal muscle ischemia. Monolayers of C2C12 myoblasts were differentiated into mature myotubes and exposed to nutrition depletion, hypoxia and hypercapnia for variable time periods. A range of culture media and gas mixture combinations were used to obtain an optimum ischemic environment. Nuclear staining, cleaved caspase-3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay were used to assess apoptosis and myotube survival. HIF-1α concentration of cell lysates, pH of conditioned media as well as partial pressures of oxygen (PO₂) and carbon dioxide (PCO₂) in the media were used to confirm ischemic simulation. Culturing myotubes in depleted media, in a gas mixture containing 20% CO+80% N₂ for 6-12 h increased the PCO₂ and decreased the pH and PO₂ of culture media. This attempts to mimic the in vivo ischemic state of skeletal muscle. These conditions were used to study the potential tissue-protective effects of erythropoietin (EPO) in C2C12 myotubes exposed to ischemia. EPO (60 ng/ml) suppressed LDH release, decreased cleaved caspase-3 and reduced the number of apoptotic nuclei, suggesting significantly decreased ischemia-induced apoptosis in myotubes (P<0.01) and a potential role in tissue protection. Additional therapeutic agents designed for tissue protection can also be evaluated using this model.

Acute coronary syndromes: the unfulfilled promise of erythropoietin in patients with MI

Over the past 5–10 years, the positive effects of erythropoietin on myocardial infarction have been reported in several experimental, animal models. However, the results of the REVEAL study call into question the beneficial effects of erythropoietin in humans presenting with myocardial infarction.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotective mechanisms: Role of mitochondria and reactive oxygen species

Reperfusion therapy must be applied as soon as possible to attenuate the ischemic insult of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However reperfusion is responsible for additional myocardial damage, which likely involves opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP). In reperfusion injury, mitochondrial damage is a determining factor in causing loss of cardiomyocyte function and viability. Major mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction include the long lasting opening of mPTPs and the oxidative stress resulting from formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Several signaling cardioprotective pathways are activated by stimuli such as preconditioning and postconditioning, obtained with brief intermittent ischemia or with pharmacological agents. These pathways converge on a common target, the mitochondria, to preserve their function after ischemia/reperfusion. The present review discusses the role of mitochondria in cardioprotection, especially the involvement of adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels, ROS signaling, and the mPTP. Ischemic postconditioning has emerged as a new way to target the mitochondria, and to drastically reduce lethal reperfusion injury. Several clinical studies using ischemic postconditioning during angioplasty now support its protective effects, and an interesting alternative is pharmacological postconditioning. In fact ischemic postconditioning and the mPTP desensitizer, cyclosporine A, have been shown to induce comparable protection in AMI patients.

Anemia and iron deficiency in heart failure: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches

Anemia and iron deficiency are common in patients with heart failure (HF), and are associated with worse symptoms and adverse outcomes in this population. Although the two can occur together, anemia in HF is often not caused by iron deficiency, and iron deficiency can be present without causing anemia. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have been investigated extensively in the past few years and might be of benefit in patients with HF and anemia. However, concerns have arisen regarding the safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with chronic kidney disease and so the results of a large mortality trial are eagerly awaited to provide information on safety in patients with HF. Iron supplementation or replacement is a much older treatment option for patients with HF and anemia, but questions about the safety of intravenous iron, and absorption problems with oral formulations have prevented its widespread use to date. In the past few years, however, new data on the importance of iron deficiency in HF have become available, and a number of studies with intravenous iron have shown promising results. Therefore, this treatment approach is likely to become an attractive option for patients with HF and iron deficiency, both with and without anemia.

Intravenous erythropoietin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: REVEAL: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT

Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. In experimental models of MI, erythropoietin reduces infarct size and improves left ventricular (LV) function.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous bolus of epoetin alfa in patients with STEMI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a dose-escalation safety phase and a single dose (60,000 U of epoetin alfa) efficacy phase; the Reduction of Infarct Expansion and Ventricular Remodeling With Erythropoietin After Large Myocardial Infarction (REVEAL) trial was conducted at 28 US sites between October 2006 and February 2010, and included 222 patients with STEMI who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a primary or rescue reperfusion strategy.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with intravenous epoetin alfa or matching saline placebo administered within 4 hours of reperfusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Infarct size, expressed as percentage of LV mass, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging performed 2 to 6 days after study medication administration (first CMR) and again 12 ± 2 weeks later (second CMR).

RESULTS

In the efficacy cohort, the infarct size did not differ between groups on either the first CMR scan (n = 136; 15.8% LV mass [95% confidence interval {CI}, 13.3-18.2% LV mass] for the epoetin alfa group vs 15.0% LV mass [95% CI, 12.6-17.3% LV mass] for the placebo group; P = .67) or on the second CMR scan (n = 124; 10.6% LV mass [95% CI, 8.4-12.8% LV mass] vs 10.4% LV mass [95% CI, 8.5-12.3% LV mass], respectively; P = .89). In a prespecified analysis of patients aged 70 years or older (n = 21), the mean infarct size within the first week (first CMR) was larger in the epoetin alfa group (19.9% LV mass; 95% CI, 14.0-25.7% LV mass) than in the placebo group (11.7% LV mass; 95% CI, 7.2-16.1% LV mass) (P = .03). In the safety cohort, of the 125 patients who received epoetin alfa, the composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis occurred in 5 (4.0%; 95% CI, 1.31%-9.09%) but in none of the 97 who received placebo (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with STEMI who had successful reperfusion with primary or rescue PCI, a single intravenous bolus of epoetin alfa within 4 hours of PCI did not reduce infarct size and was associated with higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events. Subgroup analyses raised concerns about an increase in infarct size among older patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00378352.

Postconditioning in acute myocardial infarction patients

Reperfusion therapy is the indispensable treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and must be applied as soon as possible to attenuate the ischemic insult. Evidence indicates that reperfusion is responsible for additional myocardial damage likely involving opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Ischemic postconditioning is a new way to dramatically reduce the lethal reperfusion injury. Several clinical studies using angioplasty postconditioning now support its protective effects in patients with an AMI. An interesting alternative is pharmacological postconditioning, which could be applied to a much larger number of patients. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore inhibitor cyclosporine A has been shown to generate a comparable protection in AMI patients. Future large-scale trials are needed to determine whether postconditioning may improve clinical outcome in ST-segment elevation MI patients.

Meta-analysis of studies of patients in the United Arab Emirates with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents

We performed a meta-analysis of 6 studies we conducted in the United Arab Emirates from 1995 to 2009. These included 1,262 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic drugs <6 hours after onset of symptoms and signs of myocardial infarction. All patients were treated with tenecteplase or alteplase to induce coronary thrombolysis. Characteristics of patients in all studies were quite similar. Overall mean age was 47 years, 98% were men, 28% had diabetes, 25% were hypertensive, 20% were hyperlipidemic, 56% were smokers, and 9% had sustained previous myocardial infarction. Incidence of adverse outcomes of 30-day mortality (3%), reinfarction (2.5%), stroke (0.4%), or major bleeding (0%) was low compared to global experience with recanalization regardless of how it was induced. There was no incidence of major bleeding requiring transfusion or laparotomy. In conclusion, in predominantly young men in the United Arab Emirates who were admitted and treated early after onset of an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction, recanalization induced by thrombolysis was an attractive therapeutic approach.

Design and rationale of the Reduction of Infarct Expansion and Ventricular Remodeling with Erythropoietin after Large Myocardial Infarction (REVEAL) trial

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death despite advances in pharmacologic and percutaneous therapies. Animal models of ischemia/reperfusion have demonstrated that single-dose erythropoietin may reduce infarct size, decrease apoptosis, and increase neovascularization, possibly through mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells.

STUDY DESIGN

REVEAL is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial evaluating the effects of epoetin α on infarct size and left ventricular remodeling in patients with large MIs. The trial comprises a dose-escalation safety phase and a single-dose efficacy phase using the highest acceptable epoetin α dose up to 60,000 IU. Up to 250 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention will be randomized to intravenous epoetin α or placebo within 4 hours of successful reperfusion. The primary study end point is infarct size expressed as a percentage of left ventricular mass, as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 2 to 6 days post study medication administration. Secondary end points will assess changes in endothelial progenitor cell numbers and changes in indices of ventricular remodeling.

CONCLUSION

The REVEAL trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the highest tolerated single dose of epoetin α in patients who have undergone successful rescue or primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

A single dose of erythropoietin in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

AIMS

Cardioprotective effects of erythropoietin (EPO) have been shown in experimental and smaller clinical studies. We performed a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial to assess the effects of a single high dose of EPO after primary coronary intervention (PCI) for an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and results Patients with a successful PCI for a first STEMI were randomized to receive either standard medical care alone, or in combination with a single bolus with 60,000 IU i.v. of epoetin alfa within 3 h after PCI. Primary endpoint was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 6 weeks, assessed by planar radionuclide ventriculography. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included enzymatic infarct size and major adverse cardiovascular events. A total of 529 patients were enrolled (EPO n = 263, control n = 266). At baseline (before EPO administration), groups were well-matched for all relevant characteristics. After a mean of 6.5 (± 2.0) weeks, LVEF was 0.53 (± 0.10) in the EPO group and 0.52 (± 0.11) in the control group (P = 0.41). Median area under the curve (inter-quartile range) after 72 h for creatinine kinase was 50 136 (28 212-76 664)U/L per 72 h in the EPO group and 53 510 (33 973-90 486)U/L per 72 h in the control group (P = 0.058). More major adverse cardiac events occurred in the control than in the EPO group (19 vs. 8; P = 0.032). Conclusion A single high dose of EPO after a successful PCI for a STEMI did not improve LVEF after 6 weeks. However, the use of EPO was related to less major adverse cardiovascular events and a favourable clinical safety profile.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

NCT00449488; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00449488?term=voors&rank=2.

Erythropoiesis stimulation in acute ischemic syndromes

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a hematopoietic hormone with extensive nonhematopoietic properties. The discovery of an EPO receptor outside the hematopoietic system has fuelled research into the beneficial effects of EPO for various conditions, predominantly in cardiovascular disease. Experimental evidence has revealed the cytoprotective properties of EPO, and it seems that the EPO-EPO receptor system provides a powerful backbone against acute myocardial ischemia, gaining from the different properties of EPO. There is an ongoing discussion about possible discrepancy between preclinical and clinical effects of EPO on the cardiovascular system. Large, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are underway to give a final verdict on EPO treatment for acute coronary syndromes.

Potential manipulation of endothelial progenitor cells in diabetes and its complications

Diabetes mellitus increases cardiovascular risk through its negative impact on vascular endothelium. Although glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity account for endothelial cell damage, endothelial repair is also affected by diabetes. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are involved in the maintenance of endothelial homoeostasis and in the process of new vessel formation. For these reasons, EPCs are thought to have a protective impact within the cardiovascular system. In addition, EPCs appear to modulate the functioning of other organs, providing neurotropic signals and promoting repair of the glomerular endothelium. The exact mechanisms by which EPCs provide cardiovascular protection are unknown and the definition of EPCs is not standardized. Notwithstanding these limitations, the literature consistently indicates that EPCs are altered in type 1 and type 2 diabetes and in virtually all diabetic complications. Moreover, experimental models suggest that EPC-based therapies might help prevent or reverse the features of end-organ complications. This identifies EPCs as having a novel pathogenic role in diabetes and being a potential therapeutic target. Several ways of favourably modulating EPCs have been identified, including lifestyle intervention, commonly used medications and cell-based approaches. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of EPC pathophysiology and the potential for EPC modulation in diabetes.

High dose epoetin beta in the first weeks following renal transplantation and delayed graft function: Results of the Neo-PDGF Study

Erythropoietin promotes nephroprotection in animal models of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Neorecormon and Prevention of Delayed Graft Function (Neo-PDGF) is a French open-label multicenter randomized study to evaluate the effect of high doses of epoetin beta (EPO-beta) during the first 2 weeks of renal transplantation on renal function in patients at risk for delayed graft function (DGF). One hundred and four patients were included in the study. Patients randomized in treatment group (A) received four injections of EPO-beta (30.000 UI each), given before surgery and at 12 h, 7 days and 14 days posttransplantation. Patients randomized in control group (B) did not receive EPO-beta. Immunosuppression included induction with basiliximab and maintenance therapy with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. At 1 month posttransplant, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD formula) was 42.5 +/- 19.0 mL/min in the EPO-beta group and 44.0 +/- 16.3 mL/min in the control group (p = ns). The frequency of DGF was similar in both groups (32% vs. 38.8%; p = ns). No difference in the incidence of serious adverse events was observed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00815867.).