1
|
Park JW, Chung H, Kim JM, Kim NY, Hong SH, Kim KA, Park JY. Pharmacokinetics of a Fixed-Dose Combination Product of Amlodipine, Losartan, Ezetimibe, and Rosuvastatin and Its Comparison with Co-administration of Four Individual Components in Healthy Participants. Drugs R D 2024; 24:179-186. [PMID: 38775910 PMCID: PMC11315872 DOI: 10.1007/s40268-024-00460-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess and compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination product (FDCP) comprising four different drugs (two antihypertensive drugs, amlodipine and losartan, and two lipid-lowering agents, ezetimibe and rosuvastatin) with their separate tablets. METHODS A total of 60 participants were enrolled in this open-label, randomized, single-dose crossover study. Each participant received a single dose of FDCP and individual tablets during each period, with a 14-day washout period between the periods. The pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, losartan, EXP3174 (an active metabolite of losartan), rosuvastatin, free ezetimibe, and total ezetimibe were evaluated and compared. RESULTS The pharmacokinetic profiles of amlodipine, losartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe after administration of the individual products were similar to those of FDCP. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) of FDCP to individual tablets were within 0.8-1.25 for all six analytes. No clinically relevant changes were observed in the vital signs or physical, biochemical, hematological, electrocardiographic, or urinalysis findings during the study, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that a newly developed FDCP containing amlodipine, losartan, ezetimibe, and rosuvastatin exhibited pharmacokinetic equivalence with the individual products and met the regulatory criteria. Both formulations were well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial (NCT04322266) was retrospectively registered on 9 September 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Woo Park
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
- Department of Neurology, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Hyewon Chung
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
| | - Jong-Min Kim
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
| | | | | | - Kyoung-Ah Kim
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
| | - Ji-Young Park
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mostaza JM, Escobar C. Rosuvastatin-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for the Control of LDL Cholesterol in Patients at High Vascular Risk. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1894. [PMID: 38610659 PMCID: PMC11012264 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Vascular diseases are the leading cause of death in Spain. Hypercholesterolemia is not only a cardiovascular risk factor, but also underlies the etiopathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Therefore, reducing LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) to the goals recommended by clinical practice guidelines, is essential to decrease the risk of vascular complications. Despite this, current LDL-C control is scarce, even in subjects with high and very high risk. This is mainly due to an insufficient intensification of lipid-lowering treatment. In this context, it is essential to prescribe the appropriate therapy, adjusted to patient's needs based on their LDL-C and their vascular risk. Rosuvastatin, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, provides intensive LDL-C reductions (up to 50-55% and 60-75%, respectively), with a low risk of side effects and in an efficient manner, in patients both without and with established atherosclerotic vascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose María Mostaza
- Lipid and Vascular Risk Unit, Department of Internal, University Hospital La Paz-Carlos III, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Carlos Escobar
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital La Paz-Carlos III, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee CJ, Kang WC, Ihm SH, Sohn IS, Woo JS, Kim JW, Hong SJ, Choi JH, Suh J, Seo J, Doh J, Son J, Park J, Lee J, Hong YJ, Heo JH, Shin J, Kang S. Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe in patients with dyslipidemia and hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, therapeutic confirmatory, phase III clinical trial. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2024; 26:262-273. [PMID: 38319595 PMCID: PMC10918710 DOI: 10.1111/jch.14778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to compare and evaluate the efficacy of the blood pressure (BP) control and cholesterol-lowering effects and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin and ezetimibe double therapy or telmisartan single therapy in dyslipidemia patients with hypertension. After a wash-out/therapeutic lifestyle change period of ≥4 weeks, a total of 100 eligible patients were randomized and received one of three treatments for 8 weeks: (1) telmisartan 80 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (TRE), (2) rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (RE), or (3) telmisartan 80 mg (T). The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluation of TRE by comparing changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) and mean percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment. The least square (LS) mean (SE) changes in msSBP at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -23.02 (3.04) versus -7.18 (3.09) mmHg in the TRE and RE groups, respectively (p < .0001), and -25.80 (2.74) versus -14.92 (2.65) mmHg in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p = .0005). The percentage changes in the mean (SD) LDL-C at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -54.97% (3.49%) versus -0.17% (3.23%) in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p < .0001). No serious adverse events occurred, and no statistically significant differences in the incidence of overall AEs and adverse drug reactions occurred among the three groups. TRE therapy significantly decreased msSBP and LDL-C compared to RE or T therapy with comparable safety and tolerability profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Joo Lee
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineSeverance HospitalYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Woong Chol Kang
- Department of CardiologyGil HospitalGachon UniversityIncheonSouth Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Ihm
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineBucheon St. Mary's HospitalThe Catholic University of KoreaSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Il Suk Sohn
- Department of CardiologyKyung Hee University Hospital at GangdongSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Jong Shin Woo
- Department of Internal MedicineKyung Hee University College of MedicineKyung Hee University Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Jin Won Kim
- Division of Interventional CardiologyCardiovascular CenterKorea University Guro HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Soon Jun Hong
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineKorea University Anam HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Choi
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicinePusan National University School of MedicineBusanSouth Korea
| | - Jung‐Won Suh
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoul National University Bundang HospitalSeongnamSouth Korea
| | - Jae‐Bin Seo
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineBoramae Medical CenterSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Joon‐Hyung Doh
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of MedicineInje University Ilsan Paik HospitalGoyangSouth Korea
| | - Jung‐Woo Son
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineWonju Severance Christian HospitalYonsei University Wonju College of MedicineWonjuSouth Korea
| | - Jae‐Hyeong Park
- Department of Cardiology in Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University HospitalSchool of Medicine, Chungnam National UniversityDaejeonSouth Korea
| | - Ju‐Hee Lee
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineChungbuk National University HospitalChungbuk National University College of MedicineCheongjuSouth Korea
| | - Young Joon Hong
- Division of CardiologyChonnam National University Medical SchoolChonnam National University HopitalGwangjuSouth Korea
| | - Jung Ho Heo
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineKosin University Gospel HospitalBusanSouth Korea
| | - Jinho Shin
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineHanyang University Seoul HospitalHanyang University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Seok‐Min Kang
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of Internal MedicineSeverance HospitalYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kang Y, Park JM, Lee SH. Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination versus Quadruple-Dose Rosuvastatin Monotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review. Yonsei Med J 2024; 65:19-26. [PMID: 38154476 PMCID: PMC10774651 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There are few studies in the literature on the dosage of statin that equivalently reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared to an ezetimibe combination and whether such regimens have differences in safety. We compared the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety of 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe to those of 20 mg rosuvastatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS databases up to December 2021. Human studies investigating the two aforementioned regimens with a randomized controlled design were selected. Outcome variables included the percentage reduction in LDL-C and other lipid parameters and rates of composite adverse events (AEs), including muscle-related symptoms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed after heterogeneity testing between studies. RESULTS Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The percentage LDL-C reduction did not differ between the combination and monotherapy groups [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.26; p=0.35]. The risk of composite AEs (odds ratio 0.50; 95% CI 0.15 to 1.72; p=0.27) of the combination was not different compared to the monotherapy group. The percentage of total cholesterol reduction was greater in the combination group (SMD 0.22; p=0.02), whereas that of triglyceride reduction and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe had largely comparable lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability as 20 mg rosuvastatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yura Kang
- Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Graduate School of Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Mi Park
- Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sang-Hak Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi H, Kang SH, Jeong SW, Yoon CH, Youn TJ, Song WH, Jeon DW, Lim SW, Lee JH, Cho SW, Chae IH, Kim CH. Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Combination Therapy With Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Trial From Korea. J Lipid Atheroscler 2023; 12:277-289. [PMID: 37800112 PMCID: PMC10548190 DOI: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This phase IV, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, and parallel clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and moderate intensity rosuvastatin combination therapy to that of high intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods This study enrolled patients with ASCVD and after a four-week screening period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (RE 10/10 group) or high-intensity rosuvastatin (R20 group) only in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the difference in the percent change in the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline to 12 weeks between two groups after treatment. Results The study found that after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, the RE10/10 group had a greater reduction in LDL-C level compared to the R20 group (-22.9±2.6% vs. -15.6 ± 2.5% [p=0.041] and -24.2±2.5% vs. -12.9±2.4% [p=0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Moreover, a greater number of patients achieved the target LDL-C level of ≤70 mg/dL after the treatment period in the combination group (74.6% vs. 59.9% [p=0.012] and 76.2% vs. 50.8% [p<0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively). Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between two groups. Conclusion Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy had better efficacy in lowering LDL-C levels without increasing adverse effects in patients with ASCVD than high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03494270.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyejung Choi
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Si-Hyuck Kang
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sang-Woo Jeong
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang-Hwan Yoon
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Youn
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Woo Hyuk Song
- Department of Cardiology, Korea University Ansan Hsopital, Ansan, Korea
| | - Dong Woon Jeon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, NHIS Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Wook Lim
- Department of Cardiology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, School of Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jun-Hee Lee
- Cardiovascular Center Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital Hallym University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Wook Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bundang Jaesang General Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - In-Ho Chae
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Cheol-Ho Kim
- Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Y, Wang Z, Jia C, Xie X, Yang S, Wang W, Xie X, Wang Q, Hu C, Xie F, Abdel-Moneim M, Hovsepian L, Wu Y, Yang N, Hou J. A Bioequivalence Study of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin Fixed Dose Combination (10 mg/10 mg) Versus the Individual Formulations Taken Concomitantly. Adv Ther 2023; 40:2205-2216. [PMID: 36897521 PMCID: PMC10129950 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02439-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluated the bioequivalence of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin fixed dose combination compared to the concomitant administration of individual formulations (ezetimibe and rosuvastatin) in Chinese healthy subjects under fasting conditions. METHODS This was a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study conducted in healthy Chinese participants under fasting conditions. Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ from test and individual reference formulations were evaluated to assess bioequivalence. The safety assessments included adverse events (AEs)/treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), potential clinically significant abnormalities (PCSAs) in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (12-ECG), and clinical laboratory parameters. RESULTS Of the 68 subjects enrolled, 67 were treated. Systemic exposure to rosuvastatin based on Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ was similar in both treatments, with respective arithmetic values 12.4 ng/ml, 117 ng·h/mL, and 120 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 12.7 ng/ml, 120 ng·h/mL, and 123 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Similarly, systemic exposure to unconjugated ezetimibe was 4.14 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for the test formulation and 3.80 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Systemic exposure to total ezetimibe was 70.5 ng/ml, 664 ng·h/mL, and 718 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 60.2 ng/ml, 648 ng·h/mL, and 702 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. The point estimates for rosuvastatin unconjugated ezetimibe and total ezetimibe were in the acceptable range of 0.80-1.25. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Fixed dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieved bioequivalence with reference to commercial tablets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CTR20202108.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujing Di
- Department of Medical Affairs, Phase I Center, Peking University (PKU) Care, Luzhong Hospital, No. 65, Taigong Road, Linzi District, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Zhaojun Wang
- Department of Medical Affairs, Phase I Center, Peking University (PKU) Care, Luzhong Hospital, No. 65, Taigong Road, Linzi District, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Chuandong Jia
- Department of Medical Affairs, Phase I Center, Peking University (PKU) Care, Luzhong Hospital, No. 65, Taigong Road, Linzi District, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Xin Xie
- Department of Medical Affairs, Phase I Center, Peking University (PKU) Care, Luzhong Hospital, No. 65, Taigong Road, Linzi District, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Shanshan Yang
- Department of Medical Affairs, Phase I Center, Peking University (PKU) Care, Luzhong Hospital, No. 65, Taigong Road, Linzi District, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Wenhua Wang
- Department of Medical Affairs, Phase I Center, Peking University (PKU) Care, Luzhong Hospital, No. 65, Taigong Road, Linzi District, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaochuan Xie
- Department of Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Shanghai, China
| | - Chanyan Hu
- Department of Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Shanghai, China
| | - Fang Xie
- Department of Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | - Yanzhen Wu
- Department of Research and Development (R&D), Sanofi, Beijing, China
| | - Na Yang
- Department of Research and Development (R&D), Sanofi, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Hou
- Department of Medical Affairs, Phase I Center, Peking University (PKU) Care, Luzhong Hospital, No. 65, Taigong Road, Linzi District, Zibo, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wahabi S, Rtibi K, Atouani A, Sebai H. Anti-Obesity Actions of Two Separated Aqueous Extracts From Arbutus ( Arbutus unedo) and Hawthorn ( Crataegus monogyna) Fruits Against High-Fat Diet in Rats via Potent Antioxidant Target. Dose Response 2023; 21:15593258231179904. [PMID: 37275393 PMCID: PMC10236257 DOI: 10.1177/15593258231179904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Arbutus unedo and Crataegus monogyna are widely distributed throughout the Mediterranean basin and commonly used in folk medicine against a wide range of diseases. Therefore, the present study has been designed to evaluate the anti-obesity potential of two aqueous extracts of the fruits of A. unedo (AUAE) and C. monogyna (CMAE). Male Wistar rats were supplied with a standard diet (SD), high-fat diet (HFD), HFD with the two separated extracts at the same dose (300 mg/kg, BW, p. o.), or HFD with atorvastatin-(ATOR) (2.1 mg/kg, BW, p. o.) for 12 weeks. Lipid profile and the liver and kidney linked-markers were assessed. Besides, obesity-related disorders' biomarkers were measured. AUAE, CMAE, and ATOR were observed to reduce significantly total body and organ weights following HFD-induced obese rat models. Likewise, epididymal and abdominal adipose tissue weights were noticeably decreased in HFD rats treated with both extracts and ATOR. Added to that, biochemical and metabolic changes were normalized by significant attenuation of lipid peroxidation accompanied with an increase of thiol-group concentrations and antioxidant status. More importantly, a modulation in trace element levels was revealed when compared with HFD group. Altogether, current study concluded that AUAE and CMAE could be potential candidates for the prevention and treatment of obesity and related disturbs induced by HFD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumaya Wahabi
- Laboratory of Functional Physiology
and Valorization of Bio-Ressources-Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Beja, University of Jendouba, Beja, Tunisia
| | - Kais Rtibi
- Laboratory of Functional Physiology
and Valorization of Bio-Ressources-Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Beja, University of Jendouba, Beja, Tunisia
| | - Amal Atouani
- Clinical Biology Laboratory, Beja
Regional Hospital, Beja, Tunisia
| | - Hichem Sebai
- Laboratory of Functional Physiology
and Valorization of Bio-Ressources-Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Beja, University of Jendouba, Beja, Tunisia
- University of Jendouba, Jendouba, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Song ZY, Kim MH, Lee HC, Park SJ, Rhee MY, Choi JI, Kim SH, Chae IH, Hong YJ, Lee NH, Hwang GS, Hur SH, Son JW, Chae JK, Kim HS. Efficacy and Safety of Coadministered Ezetimibe-Rosuvastatin plus Telmisartan in South Korean Patients with Dyslipidemia and Hypertension: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase III Trial. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062377. [PMID: 36983377 PMCID: PMC10053813 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) is expected to improve treatment compliance. METHODS There were 181 subjects who were randomized to three groups: ezetimibe-rosuvastatin 10/20 mg + telmisartan 80 mg, ezetimibe-rosuvastatin 10/20 mg, and telmisartan 80 mg. The primary outcomes were change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) and percentage change in low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared to baseline at week 8. RESULTS The least-square mean (SE) in MSSBP changes between the ezetimibe-rosuvastatin 10/20 mg + telmisartan 80 mg group and the ezetimibe-rosuvastatin 10/20 mg group were -25.81 (2.34) mmHg and -7.66 (2.45) mmHg. There was a significant difference between the two groups (-18.15 (2.83) mmHg, 95% CI -23.75 to -12.56, p < 0.0001). Changes in least-square mean (SE) in LDL-C between the ezetimibe-rosuvastatin 10/20 mg + telmisartan 80 mg group and the telmisartan 80 mg group were -63.82 (2.87)% and -2.48 (3.12)%. A significant difference was observed between the two groups (-61.34 (3.33)%, 95% CI -67.91 to -54.78, p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS Ezetimibe-rosuvastatin plus telmisartan treatment is effective and safe when compared to either ezetimibe-rosuvastatin or telmisartan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao-Yan Song
- Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan 49201, Republic of Korea
| | - Moo-Hyun Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan 49201, Republic of Korea
| | - Han-Cheol Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Ji Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Moo-Yong Rhee
- Cardiovascular Center, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang 10326, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Il Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 07061, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Ho Chae
- Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Joon Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam-Ho Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyo-Seung Hwang
- Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Ho Hur
- Division of Cardiology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Woo Son
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Seoul 26426, Republic of Korea
| | - Jei-Keon Chae
- Department of Cardiology, Chunbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju 54907, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo-Soo Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul Naional University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pharmacokinetic Interactions and Tolerability of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe: A Randomized, Phase 1, Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Participants. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2023; 48:51-62. [PMID: 36437383 PMCID: PMC9823065 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-022-00798-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe has promising clinical benefits with a significant safety and tolerability profile. However, there is a lack of clinical data supporting the drug-drug interaction (DDI) in Chinese population. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the potential pharmacokinetic DDI between rosuvastatin and ezetimibe in a Chinese population. METHODS In this randomized, open-label, phase 1 study, 12 healthy volunteers were randomized to three treatment groups: 10 mg rosuvastatin plus 10 mg ezetimibe, 10 mg rosuvastatin alone, and 10 mg ezetimibe alone under fasting conditions. The plasma concentrations of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe were determined, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Primary endpoints were peak plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve from zero to last measurement (AUC0-t), and area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) that were log-transformed, and co-administration was compared with monotherapy to evaluate the DDI. RESULTS The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of rosuvastatin with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.94 (0.80-1.12) for Cmax, 0.96 (0.85-1.08) for AUC0-t, and 0.96 (0.86-1.07) for AUC0-∞ when administered in combination with ezetimibe versus administered alone. The GMRs of unconjugated ezetimibe and total ezetimibe with 90% CIs were 1.15 (1.00-1.32) and 0.93 (0.80-1.07) for Cmax, 0.96 (0.84-1.10) and 0.95 (0.83-1.08) for AUC0-t, and 1.06 (0.96-1.18) and 0.94 (0.80-1.11) for AUC0-∞, respectively, when administered in combination with rosuvastatin versus administered alone. CONCLUSION Co-administration of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe showed no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in a healthy Chinese population.
Collapse
|
10
|
Farnier M, Santos RD, Cosin-Sales J, Ezhov MV, Liu J, Granados D, Santoni S, Khan I, Catapano AL. Projected impact of treatment intensification with statin, ezetimibe, and statin plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination on MACE across six countries. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022; 29:2264-2271. [PMID: 36134461 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) dyslipidaemia guidelines recommend achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholestrol (LDL-C) goals based on an individual's risk. We aimed to evaluate the impact of guideline adoption with statin, ezetimibe, and statin plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) on LDL-C goal achievement and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) across six countries. METHODS AND RESULTS A simulation model with a five-year horizon (2020-2024) was developed based on Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Global Burden of Disease Study database with a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario representing status quo, intervention scenario-1 representing treatment with statin and ezetimibe as separate agents, and intervention scenario-2 representing treatment with statin or statin plus ezetimibe FDC. MACE was defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death. The mean population LDL-C was reduced from 4.25 mmol/L in the BAU scenario, to 3.65 mmol/L and 3.59 mmol/L in intervention scenarios-1 and -2, respectively. Compared with BAU, intervention scenarios-1 and-2 resulted in relative reduction of MACE by 5.4% and 6.4% representing ∼3.7 and 4.4 million MACE averted, respectively, across six countries over 5 years. The absolute benefit in terms of MACE averted was highest for China, whereas France had highest relative reduction in MACE with both intervention scenarios compared with BAU. CONCLUSION The 2019 ESC/EAS guideline-based treatment intensification with strategies based on statin, ezetimibe, and statin plus ezetimibe FDC is estimated to result in a substantial population-level benefit in terms of MACE averted compared with BAU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Farnier
- Equipe PEC2, EA 7460, Service de Cardiologie, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Raul D Santos
- Lipid Clinic Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital, Av. Dr Enéas C. Aguiar 44, 05403-900 São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, 05652- 900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Juan Cosin-Sales
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Calle San Clemente 12, 46015 Valencia, Spain.,Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrena, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marat V Ezhov
- Laboratory of Lipid Disorders, Department of Atherosclerosis, A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 15A, 3rd Cherepkovskaya street, Moscow 121552, Russia
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, 100044 Beijing, China
| | - Denis Granados
- Epidemiology and Benefit-Risk, Research and Development, Sanofi, 1, Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 91380 Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | - Serena Santoni
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Population Health Building/Hans Rosling Center, 3980 15th Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Irfan Khan
- Medical Evidence Generation, General Medicines, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA
| | - Alberico L Catapano
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan and IRCCS Multimedica, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Santangelo G, Moscardelli S, Simeoli PS, Guazzi M, Faggiano P. Management of Dyslipidemia in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: The Gap between Theory and Practice. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154608. [PMID: 35956223 PMCID: PMC9369653 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Santangelo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Moscardelli
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Pasquale Simone Simeoli
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Guazzi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Pompilio Faggiano
- Cardiothoracic Department Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25100 Brescia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chilbert MR, VanDuyn D, Salah S, Clark CM, Ma Q. Combination Therapy of Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin for Dyslipidemia: Current Insights. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:2177-2186. [PMID: 35832642 PMCID: PMC9273150 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s332352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death around the world with various efforts being made to reduce risk in patients through preventive measures. One major method for prevention has been managing cholesterol, particularly low-density lipoprotein to decrease atherosclerotic plaque burden, potentially decreasing future cardiac complications. Statins have been the gold standard therapy for hypercholesterolemia treatment due to their ease of dosing, limited drug interactions, and favorable safety profile. Unfortunately, statin therapy alone is not always effective enough to adequately control a patient’s elevated lipid levels and combination therapy may be warranted. Ezetimibe is commonly added to regimens to help augment cholesterol lowering by inhibiting the absorption of cholesterol. The recent approval of a combination tablet of high-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe has introduced a potentially more beneficial option for cholesterol management in addition to the only available combination of moderate intensity simvastatin and ezetimibe. We aimed to identify potential beneficial effects of ezetimibe by comparing its use in combination with high-intensity rosuvastatin compared to a statin therapy alone or in combination with moderate intensity simvastatin through a literature review. The current evidence indicated that combination therapy outperformed statin monotherapy in reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and patients were more likely to achieve their target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal level. This suggests rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination holds a potential place in therapy for patients requiring a more aggressive reduction in cholesterol to help prevent atherosclerotic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya R Chilbert
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Buffalo General Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Maya R Chilbert, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 202 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, USA, Tel +1 716 829-5172, Fax +1 716-829-6093, Email
| | - Dylan VanDuyn
- Department of Pharmacy, Buffalo Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sara Salah
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Collin M Clark
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Buffalo General Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Qing Ma
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schiele F, Pérez de Isla L, Arca M, Vlachopoulos C. Is it Time for Single-Pill Combinations in Dyslipidemia? Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2022; 22:239-249. [PMID: 34549371 PMCID: PMC9061650 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-021-00498-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite the availability of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) that are safe and effective, the overall rate of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control at a population level in real-life studies is low. Higher-intensity treatment, earlier intervention, and longer-term treatment have all been shown to improve outcomes. However, in clinical practice, actual exposure to LLT is a product of the duration and intensity of, and adherence to, the treatment. To increase exposure to LLTs, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommended a stepwise optimization of LLTs by increasing statin intensity to the maximally tolerated dose, with subsequent addition of ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. Evidence from randomized controlled trials performed in a range of patients suggested that adding ezetimibe to statins rather than doubling the statin dose resulted in significantly more patients at LDL-C goal and significantly fewer patients discontinuing treatment because of adverse events. In addition, data showed that combination treatments effectively increased exposure to LLT. Despite these data and recommendations, optimization of LLT is often limited to increasing statin dose. Therapeutic inertia and poor treatment adherence are significant and prevalent barriers to increasing treatment exposure. They are known to be influenced by pill burden and complexity of treatment. Single-pill combinations provide a strategic approach that supports the intensification of treatment without increasing pill burden or treatment complexity. Single-pill combinations, compared with free associations, have been shown to increase the adherence to LLT and the percentage of patients at LDL-C goal.
Collapse
|
14
|
Catapano AL, Vrablik M, Karpov Y, Berthou B, Loy M, Baccara-Dinet M. A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of New-Formulation Zenon (Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination) in Primary Hypercholesterolemia Inadequately Controlled by Statins. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2022; 27:10742484221138284. [PMID: 36420979 DOI: 10.1177/10742484221138284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In primary hypercholesterolemia many people treated with statins do not reach their plasma LDL-C goals and are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of a new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (R/E) in this population. METHODS This was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-arm study of FDC R/E in people with primary hypercholesterolemia at very high risk (VHR) or high risk (HR) of CVD, inadequately controlled with 20 mg or 10 mg stable daily dose of rosuvastatin or equipotent dose of another statin. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of FDC R/E versus rosuvastatin monotherapy uptitrated to 40 mg (R40) or 20 mg (R20) in reduction of LDL-C after 6 weeks. RESULTS Randomized VHR participants (n = 244) were treated with R40, R40/E10, or R20/E10; randomized HR participants (n = 208) received R10/E10 or R20. In VHR participants, superiority of R40/E10 and R20/E10 versus R40 was demonstrated on LDL-C percent change from baseline to Week 6 with least squares mean differences (LSMD) of -19.66% (95% CI: -29.48% to -9.84%; P < .001) and -12.28% (95% CI: -22.12% to -2.44%; P = .015), respectively. In HR participants, superiority of R10/E10 over R20 was not demonstrated (LSMD -5.20%; 95% CI: -15.18% to 4.78%; P = .306), despite clinically relevant LDL-C reduction with R10/E10. No unexpected safety findings were reported. CONCLUSIONS The results from this study suggest that R/E FDCs improve LDL-C reduction and goal achievement in people with primary hypercholesterolemia inadequately controlled with statins and at VHR/HR of CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberico L Catapano
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan and IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy
| | - Michal Vrablik
- 3rd Department of Medicine-Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Yuri Karpov
- Angiology Department, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology named after Academician E.I. Chazov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Baptiste Berthou
- Biostatistician, IT&M Stats for Sanofi, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - Megan Loy
- Global Dyslipidemia Therapeutic Area Lead, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wan S, Ding Y, Ji X, Meng R. The safety and efficacy of Ezetimibe Plus Statins on ASVD and Related Diseases. Aging Dis 2021; 12:1857-1871. [PMID: 34881073 PMCID: PMC8612613 DOI: 10.14336/ad.2021.0412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well known that atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASVD) in the elderly is a global disease with high morbidity, mortality and disability, and plasma LDL-C correction is the most important strategy for ASVD control. However, a large proportion of patients failed to achieve their ideal LDL-C goals after statins use. Ezetimibe, a newly non-statin lipid-lowering agent, is an inhibitor of exogenous cholesterol absorption. Whereby, ezetimibe plus statins may reduce LDL-C more strongly than statins alone. Differed from any other papers published previously, which only involved ezetimibe plus statins for coronary heart disease, the highlight of this paper is to summarize the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe plus statins in all kinds of ASVD subtypes and their related diseases, mainly included aortic atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular and peripheral artery diseases. Obviously, this paper is inimitable, which will provide the readers an important reference, especially in treating the elderly with multi-organs atherosclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuling Wan
- 1Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,2Advanced Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,3Department of China-America Institute of Neuroscience, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuchuan Ding
- 2Advanced Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,4Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Xunming Ji
- 1Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,2Advanced Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,3Department of China-America Institute of Neuroscience, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ran Meng
- 1Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,2Advanced Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China.,3Department of China-America Institute of Neuroscience, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boutari C, Karagiannis A, Athyros VG. Rosuvastatin and ezetimibe for the treatment of dyslipidemia and hypercholesterolemia. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2021; 19:575-580. [PMID: 34102931 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1940959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Statins are powerful lipid-lowering agents which reduce cardiovascular (CV)-related morbidity and mortality. However, a large proportion of patients cannot attain the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, despite receiving maximally tolerated doses of high-intensity statins. Also, adherence to treatment may be reduced due to statin-induced myopathy or other side effects. For these reasons, guidelines recommend adding the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe.Areas covered: Authors discuss the main pharmacological characteristics of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe, their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects, as well as the clinical effects of the fixed dose combination of these drugs when used to treat dyslipidemia.Expert opinion: The rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination is safe and effective in patients with hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia with or without diabetes and with or without cardiovascular disease. This drug combination enabled higher proportions of patients to achieve recommended LDL-C goals than rosuvastatin monotherapy or the simvastatin/ezetimibe combination, without additional adverse events. Despite the lack of additional CV outcomes data and comparisons with atorvastatin/ezetimibe, rosuvastatin/ezetimibe appears as a potent and generally well-tolerated drug combination eligible for the management of hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia in adults. Recently, the 40 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe fixed combination was approved and is also evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrysoula Boutari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University and School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Asterios Karagiannis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University and School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasilios G Athyros
- Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University and School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barrios V, Escobar C. Fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe: treating hypercholesteremia according to cardiovascular risk. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2021; 14:793-806. [PMID: 33970743 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1925539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with lipid-lowering therapies has been associated with a decrease in the frequency of cardiovascular events.Areas covered: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed (MEDLINE), using the MeSH terms [Rosuvastatin] + [Ezetimibe] + [Dyslipidemia] + [treatment]. Original data from clinical trials, prospective and retrospective studies and more useful reviews were selected.Expert opinion: While statins continue to be the cornerstone of dyslipidemia management, many patients do not attain LDL-C targets with high-intensity statins alone. Rosuvastatin is a high-intensity statin with a low risk of adverse effects and drug-drug interactions and proven benefits in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Rosuvastatin and ezetimibe have complementary mechanisms of action that enhance their ability to reduce LDL-C levels. Various studies have shown that the combination of rosuvastatin 10-40 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg enables considerable reductions in LDL-C (up to 60-75%) with a good safety profile in a broad spectrum of patients with hypercholesterolemia, including those at high risk and those with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In addition, a fixed-dose combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe may improve adherence to medication. In this review, the available evidence on the combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe is updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivencio Barrios
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital Ramón Y Cajal. Alcalá University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Escobar
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combines two lipid-lowering agents: rosuvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (i.e. statin) with particularly strong inhibitory effects on hepatic cholesterol synthesis, and ezetimibe, which inhibits the intestinal absorption of cholesterol. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe is indicated as an adjunctive therapy to diet for the management of primary hypercholesterolemia in adults in numerous countries worldwide. In well-designed clinical trials evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe administered as either separate agents or as an FDC, rosuvastatin/ezetimibe was significantly more effective than rosuvastatin monotherapy (including at double the dose of rosuvastatin) or simvastatin/ezetimibe in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol in adults with hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, rosuvastatin/ezetimibe enabled significantly higher proportions of patients to achieve recommended LDL-C levels than rosuvastatin monotherapy or simvastatin/ezetimibe. Rosuvastatin/ezetimibe did not significantly differ from rosuvastatin monotherapy with respect to incidences of treatment-related or serious adverse events in these short-term trials and displayed a similar safety profile to simvastatin/ezetimibe. While additional cardiovascular outcomes data and head-to-head comparisons with atorvastatin/ezetimibe would be of interest, rosuvastatin/ezetimibe is a potent and generally well-tolerated drug combination that extends the range of options available for the pharmacological management of primary hypercholesterolemia in adults.
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhu Y, Hu H, Yang J, Yao Q, Xu H, Yu Y, Liu T, Lin S. The efficacy and safety of statin in combination with ezetimibe compared with double-dose statin in patients with high cardiovascular risk: A meta-analysis. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2020; 20:169-182. [PMID: 31668143 PMCID: PMC7202188 DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, statins are the first-line therapies for dyslipidemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, however, their hypolipidemic effects have not been satisfactory. We performed a meta-analysis to compare lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and statin combination therapy with double-dose statin monotherapy in patients with high cardiovascular risk. Fourteen studies involving 3105 participants were included in the final analysis; 1558 (50.18%) participants received ezetimibe and statin combination therapy and 1547 (49.82%) received double-dose statin monotherapy. Eight studies reported the percentages of changes in several lipid parameters from baseline to endpoint in both groups. Lipid parameters changed more significantly in patients coadministered with ezetimibe and statin (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]: MD = -9.39, 95% CI -13.36 to -5.42; non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [non-HDL-C]: MD = -10.36, 95% CI -14.23 to -6.50; total cholesterol [TC]: MD = -8.11, 95% CI -10.95 to -5.26; and triglyceride [TG]: MD = -5.96, 95% CI -9.12 to -2.80), with moderate to high heterogeneity among the studies. Two out of fourteen studies investigated several different statins. Our subgroup analysis showed that, compared with double-dose atorvastatin monotherapy, ezetimibe and atorvastatin combination therapy significantly decreased LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TC, and TG levels by 14.16%, 14.01%, 11.06%, and 5.96%, respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of laboratory-related adverse events (AEs) between statin combination therapy and monotherapy. Overall, ezetimibe and statin combination therapy significantly decreased LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and TC levels in patients with high cardiovascular risk, among which ezetimibe combined with atorvastatin had the best therapeutic effect. Compared with ezetimibe and statin combination therapy, double-dose statin monotherapy did not increase the risk of AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunyun Zhu
- Geriatrics Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Haochang Hu
- Cardiovascular Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China. h
| | - Jun Yang
- Geriatrics Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qi Yao
- Geriatrics Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongyu Xu
- Geriatrics Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yushan Yu
- Geriatrics Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ting Liu
- Geriatrics Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shaoyi Lin
- Cardiovascular Department, Ningbo First Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Strilchuk L, Tocci G, Fogacci F, Cicero AFG. An overview of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe association for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:531-539. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1714028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Larysa Strilchuk
- Department of Therapy and Medical Diagnostics, Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Giuliano Tocci
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome Sapienza, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Cardiology Unit, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Federica Fogacci
- Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Arrigo F. G. Cicero
- Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Drexel H, Coats AJS, Spoletini I, Bilato C, Mollace V, Perrone Filardi P, Rosano GMC. An expert opinion paper on statin adherence and implementation of new lipid-lowering medications by the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy: Barriers to be overcome. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY 2019; 6:115-121. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Benefits and safety on statins have been well-established over 20 years of research. Despite this, the vast majority of patients are not adequately treated and do not achieve the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target levels. This is mainly due to poor adherence, which is associated with dangerous and sometimes fatal outcomes. To increase adherence and prevent worse outcomes, a combination therapy with lower dosage of statins and new lipid-lowering drugs may be used. However, the implementation of new lipid-lowering drugs in European countries is still at the beginning. For these reasons, the aim of this position paper is to give an up-to-date indication from the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy in order to discuss the barriers towards statins adherence and new lipid-lowering drugs implementation in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Drexel
- Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria
- Division of Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Private University of the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew J S Coats
- University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ilaria Spoletini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Centre for Clinical and Basic Research, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via della Pisana, 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Bilato
- Division of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mollace
- Institute for Food Safety & Health University, ‘Magna Graecia of Catanzaro’, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pasquale Perrone Filardi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M C Rosano
- Department of Medical Sciences, Centre for Clinical and Basic Research, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Via della Pisana, 235, 00163 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nishida C, Matsumoto Y, Fujimoto K, Shirakawa M, Wrishko RE, Behm MO, Furihata K. The Bioequivalence and Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of a Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Containing Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Healthy Japanese Subjects. Clin Transl Sci 2019; 12:704-712. [PMID: 31365188 PMCID: PMC6853265 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Certain patient populations are unable to achieve the recommended low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol goals with statin monotherapy alone. Such patients may benefit from concomitant therapy with ezetimibe (EZE) 10 mg added on to a statin. To this end, fixed‐dose combination (FDC) tablets containing EZE 10 mg and rosuvastatin (ROS) 2.5 mg (EZE/ROS2.5) and EZE 10 mg and ROS 5 mg (EZE/ROS5) have been developed for treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The purpose of the series of clinical studies reported herein was to evaluate the potential food effect (MK‐0653H, protocol 836 (P836)) and the bioequivalence between FDC and co‐administration of EZE and ROS in healthy Japanese subjects under fasted and fed conditions (MK‐0653H, protocol 835 (P835) and MK‐0653H, protocol 846 (P846), respectively). These studies show there is no clinically relevant food effect on EZE exposure following single oral administration of the FDC EZE/ROS5 in healthy Japanese subjects; however, ROS exposure was decreased in the fed state under conditions used to evaluate the maximum food effect. Following single oral administration of individual ROS tablets under the same conditions, the magnitude of decrease in ROS exposure was comparable to that seen with FDC, suggesting that the effect of food on ROS exposure was similar between the FDC tablet and co‐administration of individual EZE and ROS tablets. The FDC EZE/ROS5 was generally well tolerated in healthy Japanese subjects under fasted and fed conditions.
Collapse
|
23
|
Pappa E, Rizos CV, Filippatos TD, Elisaf MS. Emerging Fixed-Dose Combination Treatments for Hyperlipidemia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2019; 24:315-322. [DOI: 10.1177/1074248419838506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Pappa
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christos V. Rizos
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Theodosios D. Filippatos
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Moses S. Elisaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hong SJ, Jeong HS, Ahn JC, Cha DH, Won KH, Kim W, Cho SK, Kim SY, Yoo BS, Sung KC, Rha SW, Shin JH, Han KR, Chung WS, Hyon MS, Lee HC, Bae JH, Rhee MY, Kwan J, Jeon DW, Yoo KD, Kim HS. A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Comparator Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy With Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin Versus Rosuvastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: I-ROSETTE (Ildong Rosuvastatin & Ezetimibe for Hypercholesterolemia) Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Ther 2019; 40:226-241.e4. [PMID: 29402522 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2017] [Revised: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Combination therapy with ezetimibe and statins is recommended in cases of statin intolerance or insufficiency. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with ezetimibe and rosuvastatin versus those of rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS I-ROSETTE (Ildong ROSuvastatin & ezETimibe for hypercholesTElolemia) was an 8-week, double-blind, multicenter, Phase III randomized controlled trial conducted at 20 hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients with hypercholesterolemia who required medical treatment according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines were eligible for participation in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ezetimibe 10 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg/rosuvastatin 10 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg/rosuvastatin 5 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg, rosuvastatin 10 mg, or rosuvastatin 5 mg in a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary end point was the difference in the mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C level after 8 weeks of treatment between the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin treatment groups. All patients were assessed for adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory data, and vital signs. FINDINGS Of 396 patients, 389 with efficacy data were analyzed. Baseline characteristics among 6 groups were similar. After 8 weeks of double-blind treatment, the percent changes in adjusted mean LDL-C levels at week 8 compared with baseline values were -57.0% (2.1%) and -44.4% (2.1%) in the total ezetimibe/rosuvastatin and total rosuvastatin groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The LDL-C-lowering efficacy of each of the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin combinations was superior to that of each of the respective doses of rosuvastatin. The mean percent change in LDL-C level in all ezetimibe/rosuvastatin combination groups was >50%. The number of patients who achieved target LDL-C levels at week 8 was significantly greater in the ezetimibe/rosuvastatin group (180 [92.3%] of 195 patients) than in the rosuvastatin monotherapy group (155 [79.9%] of 194 patients) (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of overall AEs, adverse drug reactions, and serious AEs; laboratory findings, including liver function test results and creatinine kinase levels, were comparable between groups. IMPLICATIONS Fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin significantly improved lipid profiles in patients with hypercholesterolemia compared with rosuvastatin monotherapy. All groups treated with rosuvastatin and ezetimibe reported a decrease in mean LDL-C level >50%. The safety and tolerability of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin therapy were comparable with those of rosuvastatin monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02749994.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soon Jun Hong
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Saem Jeong
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Cheon Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Hun Cha
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bundang CHA Hospital, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Heon Won
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Weon Kim
- Cardiovascular Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Kyoon Cho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Yeon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Su Yoo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Chul Sung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Woon Rha
- Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon-Han Shin
- Department of Cardiology, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoo Rok Han
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Wook Sung Chung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Su Hyon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Cheol Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang-Ho Bae
- Division of Cardiology Heart Center, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon
| | - Moo-Yong Rhee
- Cardiovascular Center, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Kwan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Woon Jeon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, NHIS Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Dong Yoo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo-Soo Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ezetimibe in high-risk, previously treated statin patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of lipid efficacy. Clin Res Cardiol 2018; 108:487-509. [PMID: 30302558 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-018-1379-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE While statins are used as first-line treatments for high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia, statin monotherapy is often insufficient to achieve target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Second-line treatment options include up-titration of statin dose, switching to a more potent statin, or combination therapy, e.g., with ezetimibe. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adding ezetimibe to simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin monotherapy versus doubling the dosage or switching to a higher-potency statin in a population of patients with hypocholesterolemia at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and who had been previously treated with a statin. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed and evidence bases were established for populations of atorvastatin-, simvastatin-, and rosuvastatin-experienced patients using eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Based on the available data, we constructed networks of evidence and conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) within each statin population. The primary outcome of interest was percent change from baseline in LDL-C. Changes in total cholesterol were explored as a secondary outcome. FINDINGS Across all patient populations, 35 RCTs were identified and included in the evidence base. Among patients on simvastatin therapy, the addition of ezetimibe resulted in a mean difference (MD) in LDL-C of - 13.62% (95% CrI - 19.99, - 6.91; see table below) compared to doubling the starting dose of simvastatin. In the population of patients on atorvastatin therapy, the addition of ezetimibe resulted in an MD in LDL-C of - 14.71% (95% CrI - 16.46, - 12.95) compared to doubling the starting dose of atorvastatin. The addition of ezetimibe to rosuvastatin resulted in an MD in LDL-C of - 14.96% (95% CrI - 17.79, - 12.11), compared to doubling the starting rosuvastatin dose. Similar trends were observed for changes in total cholesterol. IMPLICATIONS Given the available data, the addition of ezetimibe to ongoing simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin monotherapy offers greater reduction in LDL-C among patients at high risk of CVD compared to doubling the initial statin dose.
Collapse
|
26
|
Kim W, Yoon YE, Shin SH, Bae JW, Hong BK, Hong SJ, Sung KC, Han SH, Kim W, Rhee MY, Kim SH, Lee SE, Hyon MS, Hwang GS, Son JW, Kim JY, Kim MK, Kim SW, Park JH, Shin JH, Park CG. Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin Combination Therapy Versus Those of Rosuvastatin Monotherapy in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia. Clin Ther 2018; 40:993-1013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
27
|
Min KL, Park MS, Jung J, Chang MJ, Kim CO. Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Fixed-dose Combination of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe Versus Separate Tablets in Healthy Subjects. Clin Ther 2017; 39:1799-1810. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
28
|
Ran D, Nie HJ, Gao YL, Deng SB, Du JL, Liu YJ, Jing XD, She Q. A randomized, controlled comparison of different intensive lipid-lowering therapies in Chinese patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS): Ezetimibe and rosuvastatin versus high-dose rosuvastatin. Int J Cardiol 2017; 235:49-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
29
|
Kim KJ, Kim SH, Yoon YW, Rha SW, Hong SJ, Kwak CH, Kim W, Nam CW, Rhee MY, Park TH, Hong TJ, Park S, Ahn Y, Lee N, Jeon HK, Jeon DW, Han KR, Moon KW, Chae IH, Kim HS. Effect of fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe plus rosuvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: MRS-ROZE (Multicenter Randomized Study of ROsuvastatin and eZEtimibe). Cardiovasc Ther 2016; 34:371-82. [PMID: 27506635 PMCID: PMC5108468 DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM We aimed to compare the effects of fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe plus rosuvastatin to rosuvastatin alone in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, including a subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHOD This multicenter eight-week randomized double-blind phase III study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe 10 mg plus rosuvastatin, compared with rosuvastatin alone in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Four hundred and seven patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who required lipid-lowering treatment according to the ATP III guideline were randomized to one of the following six treatments for 8 weeks: fixed-dose combinations with ezetimibe 10 mg daily plus rosuvastatin (5, 10, or 20 mg daily) or rosuvastatin alone (5, 10, or 20 mg daily). RESULTS Fixed-dose combination of ezetimibe plus rosuvastatin significantly reduced LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels compared with rosuvastatin alone. Depending on the rosuvastatin dose, these fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe plus rosuvastatin provided LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride reductions of 56%-63%, 37%-43%, and 19%-24%, respectively. Moreover, the effect of combination treatment on cholesterol levels was more pronounced in patients with DM or MetS than in non-DM or non-MetS patients, respectively, whereas the effect of rosuvastatin alone did not differ between DM vs non-DM or MetS vs non-MetS patients. CONCLUSION Fixed-dose combinations of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin provided significantly superior efficacy to rosuvastatin alone in lowering LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Moreover, the reduction rate was greater in patients with DM or MetS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung-Jin Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Won Yoon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Woon Rha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon-Jun Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Choong-Hwan Kwak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Center, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Weon Kim
- Cardiovascular Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University, Gyeongju, Korea
| | - Moo-Yong Rhee
- Cardiovascular Center, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae-Ho Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | | | - Sungha Park
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngkeun Ahn
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Namho Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hui-Kyung Jeon
- Department of Cardiovascular, Uijeongbu, Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Woon Jeon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, NHIC Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyoo-Rok Han
- Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Keon-Woong Moon
- Cardiology Division, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - In-Ho Chae
- Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
| | - Hyo-Soo Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A lipidologist perspective of global lipid guidelines and recommendations, part 2: Lipid treatment goals. J Clin Lipidol 2015; 10:240-64. [PMID: 27055955 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 10/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Having knowledge of worldwide areas of harmonization and consensus regarding lipid guidelines and recommendations may provide clinicians a more global perspective on lipid management. This review examines 8 international scientific/medical organizations that have issued lipid guidelines, recommendations, and position papers: the National Lipid Association (2014), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2014), International Atherosclerosis Society (2013), American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (2013), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (2013), Japan Atherosclerosis Society (2012), European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (2012), and Adult Treatment Panel III (2001/2004). Part 1 of this perspective focused on sentinel components of these lipid guidelines and recommendations as applied to the role of atherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol levels, primary lipid target of therapy, other primary and secondary lipid treatment targets, and assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. This part 2 examines goals of lipid-altering therapy. While lipid guidelines and recommendations may differ regarding ASCVD risk assessment and lipid treatment goals, lipid guidelines and recommendations generally agree on the need to reduce atherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol levels, with statins being the first-line treatment of choice.
Collapse
|
31
|
Farnier M, Jones P, Severance R, Averna M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Colhoun HM, Du Y, Hanotin C, Donahue S. Efficacy and safety of adding alirocumab to rosuvastatin versus adding ezetimibe or doubling the rosuvastatin dose in high cardiovascular-risk patients: The ODYSSEY OPTIONS II randomized trial. Atherosclerosis 2015; 244:138-46. [PMID: 26638010 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Revised: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare lipid-lowering efficacy of adding alirocumab to rosuvastatin versus other treatment strategies (NCT01730053). METHODS Patients receiving baseline rosuvastatin regimens (10 or 20 mg) were randomized to: add-on alirocumab 75 mg every-2-weeks (Q2W) (1-mL subcutaneous injection via pre-filled pen); add-on ezetimibe 10 mg/day; or double-dose rosuvastatin. Patients had cardiovascular disease (CVD) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) or CVD risk factors and LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L). In the alirocumab group, dose was blindly increased at Week 12 to 150 mg Q2W (also 1-mL volume) in patients not achieving their LDL-C target. Primary endpoint was percent change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to 24 weeks (intent-to-treat). RESULTS 305 patients were randomized. In the baseline rosuvastatin 10 mg group, significantly greater LDL-C reductions were observed with add-on alirocumab (-50.6%) versus ezetimibe (-14.4%; p < 0.0001) and double-dose rosuvastatin (-16.3%; p < 0.0001). In the baseline rosuvastatin 20 mg group, LDL-C reduction with add-on alirocumab was -36.3% compared with -11.0% with ezetimibe and -15.9% with double-dose rosuvastatin (p = 0.0136 and 0.0453, respectively; pre-specified threshold for significance p < 0.0125). Overall, ∼80% alirocumab patients were maintained on 75 mg Q2W. Of alirocumab-treated patients, 84.9% and 66.7% in the baseline rosuvastatin 10 and 20 mg groups, respectively, achieved risk-based LDL-C targets. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 56.3% of alirocumab patients versus 53.5% ezetimibe and 67.3% double-dose rosuvastatin (pooled data). CONCLUSIONS The addition of alirocumab to rosuvastatin provided incremental LDL-C lowering versus adding ezetimibe or doubling the rosuvastatin dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Jones
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Maurizio Averna
- Università di Palermo - Policlinico "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Yunling Du
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bays H, Gaudet D, Weiss R, Ruiz JL, Watts GF, Gouni-Berthold I, Robinson J, Zhao J, Hanotin C, Donahue S. Alirocumab as Add-On to Atorvastatin Versus Other Lipid Treatment Strategies: ODYSSEY OPTIONS I Randomized Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:3140-8. [PMID: 26030325 PMCID: PMC4524987 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-1520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite current standard of care, many patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) still have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Alirocumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody inhibitor of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to compare the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of adding alirocumab vs other common lipid-lowering strategies. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS Patients (n = 355) with very high CVD risk and LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL or greater or high CVD risk and LDL-C of 100 mg/dL or greater on baseline atorvastatin 20 or 40 mg were randomized to one of the following: 1) add-on alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) sc; 2) add-on ezetimibe 10 mg/d; 3) double atorvastatin dose; or 4) for atorvastatin 40 mg regimen only, switch to rosuvastatin 40 mg. For patients not achieving protocol-defined LDL-C goals, the alirocumab dose was increased (blinded) at week 12 to 150 mg Q2W. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary end point was percentage change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to 24 weeks (intent to treat). RESULTS Among atorvastatin 20 and 40 mg regimens, respectively, add-on alirocumab reduced LDL-C levels by 44.1% and 54.0% (P < .001 vs all comparators); add-on ezetimibe, 20.5% and 22.6%; doubling of atorvastatin dose, 5.0% and 4.8%; and switching atorvastatin 40 mg to rosuvastatin 40 mg, 21.4%. Most alirocumab-treated patients (87.2% and 84.6%) achieved their LDL-C goals. Most alirocumab-treated patients (86%) maintained their 75-mg Q2W regimen. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 65.4% of alirocumab patients vs 64.4% ezetimibe and 63.8% double atorvastatin/switch to rosuvastatin (data were pooled). CONCLUSIONS Adding alirocumab to atorvastatin provided significantly greater LDL-C reductions vs adding ezetimibe, doubling atorvastatin dose, or switching to rosuvastatin and enabled greater LDL-C goal achievement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold Bays
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Daniel Gaudet
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Robert Weiss
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Juan Lima Ruiz
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Gerald F Watts
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Ioanna Gouni-Berthold
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jennifer Robinson
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jian Zhao
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Corinne Hanotin
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Stephen Donahue
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center (H.B.), Louisville, Kentucky 40213; ECOGENE-21 Clinical Trial Center and Department of Medicine (D.G.), Université de Montréal, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada G7H 5H6; Maine Research Associates (R.W.), Auburn, Maine 04210; Lipid and Vascular Research Unit (J.L.R.), University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, 8035 Barcelona, Spain; Lipid Disorders Clinic (G.F.W.), Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Center for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Preventive Medicine (I.G.-B.), University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany; University of Iowa (J.R.), Iowa City, Iowa 52242; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc (J.Z., S.D.), Tarrytown, New York 10591; and Sanofi (C.H.), 75014 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Luo L, Yuan X, Huang W, Ren F, Zhu H, Zheng Y, Tang L. Safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and statins in patients with hypercholesterolaemia: a meta-analysis. Intern Med J 2015; 45:546-57. [PMID: 25644680 DOI: 10.1111/imj.12706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- L. Luo
- Department of Nephrology; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing China
| | - X. Yuan
- Department of Nephrology; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing China
| | - W. Huang
- Department of Nephrology; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing China
| | - F. Ren
- Department of Nephrology; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing China
| | - H. Zhu
- Department of Nephrology; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing China
| | - Y. Zheng
- Department of Nephrology; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing China
| | - L. Tang
- Department of Nephrology; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rosuvastatin is one of the most potent statins and is currently widely prescribed. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of rosuvastatin on blood lipids. OBJECTIVES Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of rosuvastatin on serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides in participants with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. Secondary objectives To quantify the variability of the effect of various doses of rosuvastatin.To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in the randomized placebo-controlled trials. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 10 of 12, 2014 in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (1946 to October week 5 2014), EMBASE (1980 to 2014 week 44), Web of Science Core Collection (1970 to 5 November 2014) and BIOSIS Citation Index (1969 to 31 October 2014). No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of rosuvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included and extracted data. WDAEs information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials. MAIN RESULTS One-hundred and eight trials (18 placebo-controlled and 90 before-and-after) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of rosuvastatin in 19,596 participants. Rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg/day caused LDL-cholesterol decreases of 46% to 55%, when all the trials were combined using the generic inverse variance method. The quality of evidence for these effects is high. Log dose-response data over doses of 1 to 80 mg, revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol. When compared to atorvastatin, rosuvastatin was about three-fold more potent at reducing LDL-cholesterol. There was no dose-related effect of rosuvastatin on blood HDL-cholesterol, but overall, rosuvastatin increased HDL by 7%. There is a high risk of bias for the trials in this review, which would affect WDAEs, but unlikely to affect the lipid measurements. WDAEs were not statistically different between rosuvastatin and placebo in 10 of 18 of these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 1.47). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The total blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of rosuvastatin was linearly dependent on dose. Rosuvastatin log dose-response data were linear over the commonly prescribed dose range. Based on an informal comparison with atorvastatin, this represents a three-fold greater potency. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with rosuvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 44% of the placebo-controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P Adams
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics2176 Health Sciences Mall, Medical Block CVancouverCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | - Sarpreet S Sekhon
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics2176 Health Sciences Mall, Medical Block CVancouverCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | - James M Wright
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics2176 Health Sciences Mall, Medical Block CVancouverCanadaV6T 1Z3
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ambegaonkar BM, Tipping D, Polis AB, Tomassini JE, Tershakovec AM. Achieving goal lipid levels with ezetimibe plus statin add-on or switch therapy compared with doubling the statin dose. A pooled analysis. Atherosclerosis 2014; 237:829-37. [PMID: 25463129 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.10.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Revised: 10/13/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the lipid-altering effects of ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy, statin titration, switching from statin monotherapy to a more potent statin or to ezetimibe/simvastatin. METHODS A pooled analysis of patient-level data from 17 double-blind, active or placebo-controlled studies of 8667 hypercholesterolemic adults randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg added to ongoing statins, statin titration (doubling), or switching from ongoing statins to rosuvastatin (10 mg) or to ezetimibe/simvastatin (10/20 and 40 mg). Percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was estimated by analysis of variance. Percent of patients who achieved LDL-C and other guideline-recommended targets, and target lipid levels by baseline distance to goal were evaluated. RESULTS LDL-C percent change from baseline was -26.0 for ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy, -27.6 for switching from ongoing statin to ezetimibe/simvastatin, -19.7 for switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg, and -9.7 for dose doubling of the ongoing statin. For patients within 0.8 mmol/L (30 mg/dL) of the target at baseline, LDL-C target attainment rates were 75.9% for adding ezetimibe to ongoing statin, 72.8% for switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin, 61.8% for switching to rosuvastatin, and 44.3% for statin dose-doubling. Similarly, improvements in other lipids and achievement of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B targets among this patient group were largest for ezetimibe added to ongoing statins and switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin; switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg and statin dose-doubling were less effective. CONCLUSIONS Adding ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy appeared to be an effective option for patients who do not achieve lipid-lowering goals on statins alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diane Tipping
- Merck & Co., Inc., One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, NJ 07090, USA.
| | - Adam B Polis
- Merck & Co., Inc., One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, NJ 07090, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Moriarty PM, Jacobson TA, Bruckert E, Thompson PD, Guyton JR, Baccara-Dinet MT, Gipe D. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, in statin-intolerant patients: Design and rationale of ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE, a randomized phase 3 trial. J Clin Lipidol 2014; 8:554-561. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2014.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 09/10/2014] [Accepted: 09/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
37
|
Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC, Raya JL, Cain VA, Palmer MK, Karlson BW. Efficacy, safety and effect on biomarkers related to cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism of rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg vs. simvastatin 40 or 80 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg in high-risk patients: Results of the GRAVITY randomized study. Atherosclerosis 2014; 232:86-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Revised: 09/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
38
|
Bays HE, Averna M, Majul C, Muller-Wieland D, De Pellegrin A, Giezek H, Lee R, Lowe RS, Brudi P, Triscari J, Farnier M. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to atorvastatin versus atorvastatin uptitration or switching to rosuvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112:1885-95. [PMID: 24063830 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2013] [Revised: 08/06/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 1,547) at high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥100 and ≤160 mg/dl while treated with atorvastatin 10 mg/day entered a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, clinical trial using two 6-week study periods. Period I compared the efficacy/safety of (1) adding ezetimibe 10 mg (ezetimibe) to stable atorvastatin 10 mg, (2) doubling atorvastatin to 20 mg, or (3) switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg. Subjects in the latter 2 groups who persisted with elevated LDL-C levels (≥100 and ≤160 mg/dl) after period I, entered period II; subjects on atorvastatin 20 mg had ezetimibe added to their atorvastatin 20 mg, or uptitrated their atorvastatin to 40 mg; subjects on rosuvastatin 10 mg switched to atorvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe or uptitrated their rosuvastatin to 20 mg. Some subjects on atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe continued the same treatment into period II. At the end of period I, ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 10 mg reduced LDL-C significantly more than atorvastatin 20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg (22.2% vs 9.5% or 13.0%, respectively, p <0.001). At the end of period II, ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 20 mg reduced LDL-C significantly more than atorvastatin 40 mg (17.4% vs 6.9%, p <0.001); switching from rosuvastatin 10 mg to ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 20 mg reduced LDL-C significantly more than uptitrating to rosuvastatin 20 mg (17.1% vs 7.5%, p <0.001). Relative to comparative treatments, ezetimibe added to atorvastatin 10 mg (period I) or atorvastatin 20 mg (period II) produced significantly greater percent attainment of LDL-C targets <100 or <70 mg/dl, and significantly greater percent reductions in total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, most lipid and lipoprotein ratios, and apolipoprotein B (except ezetimibe plus atorvastatin 20 vs atorvastatin 40 mg). Reports of adverse experiences were generally similar among groups. In conclusion, treatment of hypercholesterolemic subjects at high cardiovascular risk with ezetimibe added to atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg produced significantly greater improvements in key lipid parameters and significantly greater attainment of LDL-C treatment targets than doubling atorvastatin or switching to (or doubling) rosuvastatin at the compared doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold E Bays
- Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Louisville, Kentucky.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kurisu S, Shimonaga T, Iwasaki T, Ishibashi K, Mitsuba N, Dohi Y, Kihara Y. Effects of ezetimibe on serum polyunsaturated fatty acids in patients with coronary artery disease. Int Heart J 2013; 54:254-7. [PMID: 24097212 DOI: 10.1536/ihj.54.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Residual risk of cardiovascular disease might stem, at least partially, from low serum concentrations of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ezetimibe on serum lipids and PU-FAs in patients with coronary artery disease who were intolerant of new or high-dose statin therapy. The study population consisted of 13 patients who were intolerant of new statin therapy and 10 patients who were intolerant of high-dose statin therapy for the treatment of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Patients who were intolerant of high-dose statin therapy continued taking a statin, but at a lower dose during the study period. Blood samples were collected before and 12 weeks after ezetimibe (10 mg). We measured serum lipids and PUFAs including dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid. Ezetimibe significantly decreased LDL cholesterol (138 ± 19 mg/dL to 97 ± 34 mg/dL, P < 0.01), but did not significantly affect high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, or any of the PUFAs measured during the follow-up period. Consequently, it did not affect the ratio of EPA to AA (0.40 ± 0.17 to 0.43 ± 0.18, P = ns) or the ratio of n-3 PUFA to n-6 PUFA (1.10 ± 0.39 to 1.09 ± 0.36, P = ns) during the follow-up period. Ezetimibe in combination with a low-dose statin, or as monotherapy in statin-intolerant patients, decreased LDL cholesterol, but did not significantly affect serum PUFA concentrations in patients with coronary artery disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Kurisu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Torimoto K, Okada Y, Mori H, Hajime M, Tanaka K, Kurozumi A, Narisawa M, Yamamoto S, Arao T, Matsuoka H, Inokuchi N, Tanaka Y. Efficacy of combination of Ezetimibe 10 mg and rosuvastatin 2.5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy for hypercholesterolemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lipids Health Dis 2013; 12:137. [PMID: 24053480 PMCID: PMC3849617 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511x-12-137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2013] [Accepted: 09/18/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statins are used to treat hypercholesterolemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but many of these patients fail to achieve the target LDL-C level. Recent reports have suggested that a synergistic effect can be obtained by concomitant administration of the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe and a statin. However, in patients with type 2 diabetes who are already being treated with satins, it remains unclear whether it is more effective to add ezetimibe or to increase the statin dose. Therefore, this study was performed to examine the effects of these two regimens on LDL-C and lipoproteins. METHODS The subjects were type 2 diabetic patients under treatment with rosuvastatin (2.5 mg daily), who had LDL-C levels ≥80 mg/dL. They were randomly allocated to a group that received add-on therapy with ezetimibe at 10 mg/day (combination group, n = 40) or an increase of the rosuvastatin dose to 5 mg/day (dose escalation group, n = 39). These two groups were compared at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS The percent change of LDL-C was -31% in the combination group and -12% in the dose escalation group. Both groups showed a significant decrease, but the decrease was greater in the combination group. In both groups, there was a significant decrease in the levels of small dense LDL-C, oxidized LDL and remnant-like lipoprotein cholesterol. For all of these parameters, the percent changes were greater in the combination group. Only the combination group showed a significant decrease of triglycerides. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with reaching an LDL-C level <80 mg/dL. As a result, add-on therapy with ezetimibe was extracted as a factor related to improvement of LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS Compared with increasing the dose of rosuvastatin, the combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe not only achieves quantitative but also qualitative improvement of serum lipid levels in type 2 diabetic patients, suggesting that this combination could suppress the progression of atherosclerosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN000011005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichi Torimoto
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Yosuke Okada
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Hiroko Mori
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Maiko Hajime
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Kenichi Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Akira Kurozumi
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Manabu Narisawa
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Sunao Yamamoto
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | - Tadashi Arao
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| | | | | | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushyu-shi 807-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rosen JB, Jimenez JG, Pirags V, Vides H, Hanson ME, Massaad R, McPeters G, Brudi P, Triscari J. A comparison of efficacy and safety of an ezetimibe/simvastatin combination compared with other intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2013; 10:277-86. [PMID: 23288881 DOI: 10.1177/1479164112465212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering efficacy of switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZ/S) 10/20 mg versus doubling the run-in statin dose (to simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes was assessed. Endpoints included percentage change in LDL-C and percentage of patients achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Significantly greater reductions in LDL-C occurred when switching to EZ/S versus statin doubling in the overall population and in subjects treated with simvastatin 20 mg or atorvastatin 10 mg (all p < 0.001). The LDL-C reduction was numerically greater when switching to EZ/S versus switching to rosuvastatin (p = 0.060). Significantly more subjects reached LDL-C <70 mg/dL with EZ/S (54.5%) versus statin doubling (27.0%) or rosuvastatin (42.5%) in the overall population (all p < 0.001) and within each stratum (all p < 0.001). Switching to EZ/S provided significantly greater reductions in LDL-C versus statin doubling and significantly greater achievement of LDL-C targets versus statin doubling or switching to rosuvastatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey B Rosen
- Clinical Research of South Florida, Coral Gables, FL 33134, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
van der Wulp MYM, Verkade HJ, Groen AK. Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2013; 368:1-16. [PMID: 22721653 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2012.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2012] [Revised: 05/17/2012] [Accepted: 06/11/2012] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Hypercholesterolemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. It is caused by a disturbed balance between cholesterol secretion into the blood versus uptake. The pathways involved are regulated via a complex interplay of enzymes, transport proteins, transcription factors and non-coding RNA's. The last two decades insight into underlying mechanisms has increased vastly but there are still a lot of unknowns, particularly regarding intracellular cholesterol transport. After decades of concentration on the liver, in recent years the intestine has come into focus as an important control point in cholesterol homeostasis. This review will discuss current knowledge of cholesterol physiology, with emphasis on cholesterol absorption, cholesterol synthesis and fecal excretion, and new (possible) therapeutic options for hypercholesterolemia.
Collapse
|
43
|
Sheely D, Jialal I. Strategies to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in metabolic syndrome: averting the diabetes risk. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2013; 11:149-51. [PMID: 23496028 DOI: 10.1089/met.2013.1503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
44
|
Catapano A, Toth PP, Tomassini JE, Tershakovec AM. The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with statin therapy in various patient groups. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/clp.12.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
45
|
De Meyer I, Martinet W, De Meyer GRY. Therapeutic strategies to deplete macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012; 74:246-63. [PMID: 22309283 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04211.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Macrophages can be found in all stages of atherosclerosis and are major contributors of atherosclerotic plaque development, progression and destabilization. Continuous recruitment of monocytes drives this chronic inflammatory disease, which can be intervened by several strategies: reducing the inflammatory stimulus by lowering circulating lipids and promoting cholesterol efflux from plaque, direct and indirect targeting of adhesion molecules and chemokines involved in monocyte adhesion and transmigration and inducing macrophage death in atherosclerotic plaques in combination with anti-inflammatory drugs. This review discusses the outlined strategies to deplete macrophages from atherosclerotic plaques to promote plaque stabilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge De Meyer
- Division of Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ito MK. Dyslipidemia: Management Using Optimal Lipid-Lowering Therapy. Ann Pharmacother 2012; 46:1368-81. [DOI: 10.1345/aph.1r127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate current approaches and explore emerging research related to dyslipidemia management. Data Sources: MEDLINE (2004-April 2012) was searched for randomized controlled trials using the terms dyslipidemia and lipid-lowering therapy or statin (>1000 hits). Separate searches (MEDLINE, Google) identified meta-analyses (2010–2011), disease prevalence statistics, and current consensus guidelines (2004–July 2011). Additional references were identified from the publications reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language articles on large multi-center trials were evaluated. Data Synthesis: National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines for the reduction of cardiovascular risk recommend the attainment of specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) target values, based on an individual's 10-year risk of coronary heart disease or global risk. For most patients unable to achieve recommended lipid level goals with therapeutic lifestyle changes, statins are the first option for treatment. Results of large, well-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that statins are effective in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diverse populations, including patients with diabetes and the elderly, and that intensive statin therapy provides more effective lipid goal attainment and significantly greater risk reduction in patients with coronary artery disease. Stalin therapy is generally well tolerated but may increase the risk of myopathy. Statin use has been associated with increases in hepatic transaminases and an increased risk of diabetes, although the absolute risk of diabetes is low compared with the risk reduction benefit. Combination therapy including a statin may be appropriate for certain populations, but the risk reduction benefits of combination therapy remain unclear. Ezetimibe is an important treatment option for patients with hypercholesterolemia who do not tolerate intensive statin therapy. Although fibrates or niacin improves overall lipid profiles in patients with hypertriglyceridemia or dyslipidemia who are receiving statin therapy, their efficacy in reducing cardiovascular risk remains questionable and their use raises safety and tolerability concerns. Conclusions: Intensifying lifestyle changes and statin dose should be utilized first in patients not achieving their LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Ito
- Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bibliography. Hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease. Current world literature. Curr Opin Lipidol 2012; 23:386-91. [PMID: 22801387 DOI: 10.1097/mol.0b013e32835670af] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
48
|
Toth PP, Morrone D, Weintraub WS, Hanson ME, Lowe RS, Lin J, Shah AK, Tershakovec AM. Safety profile of statins alone or combined with ezetimibe: a pooled analysis of 27 studies including over 22,000 patients treated for 6-24 weeks. Int J Clin Pract 2012; 66:800-812. [PMID: 22805272 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02964.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this analysis was to assess the overall safety and tolerability profiles of various statins + ezetimibe vs. statin monotherapy and to explore tolerability in sub-populations grouped by age, race, and sex. Methods: Study-level data were combined from 27 double-blind, placebo-controlled or active-comparator trials that randomized adult hypercholesterolemic patients to statin or statin + ezetimibe for 6-24 weeks. In the full cohort, % patients with AEs within treatment groups (statin: N = 10,517; statin + ezetimibe: N = 11,714) was assessed by logistic regression with terms for first-/second-line therapy (first line = drug-naïve or rendered drug-naïve by washout at study entry; second line = ongoing statin at study entry or statin run-in), trial within first-/second-line therapy, and treatment. The same model was fitted for age (< 65, ≥ 65 years), sex, race (white, black, other) and first-/second-line subgroups with additional terms for subgroup and subgroup-by-treatment interaction. Results: In the full cohort, the only significant difference between treatments was consecutive AST or ALT elevations ≥ 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN) (statin: 0.35%, statin + ezetimibe: 0.56%; p = 0.017). Significantly more subjects reported ≥ 1 AE; drug-related, hepatitis-related and gastrointestinal-related AEs; and CK elevations ≥ 10 × ULN (all p ≤ 0.008) in first-line vs. second-line therapy studies with both treatments. AEs were generally similar between treatments in subgroups, and similar rates of AEs were reported within age and race subgroups; however, women reported generally higher AE rates. Conclusions: In conclusion, in second-line studies, ongoing statin treatment at study entry likely screened out participants for previous statin-related AEs and tolerability issues. These results describe the safety profiles of widely used lipid-lowering therapies and encourage their appropriate and judicious use in certain subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P P Toth
- CGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL, and University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, USA Christiana Center for Outcomes Research, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA Global Scientific and Medical Publications, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA Clinical and Quantitative Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA Project Leadership and Management, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shanes JG. A review of the rationale for additional therapeutic interventions to attain lower LDL-C when statin therapy is not enough. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2012; 14:33-40. [PMID: 22109348 PMCID: PMC3252497 DOI: 10.1007/s11883-011-0222-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Statins alone are not always adequate therapy to achieve low-density lipoprotein (LDL) goals in many patients. Many options are available either alone or in combination with statins that makes it possible to reach recommended goals in a safe and tolerable fashion for most patients. Ezetimibe and bile acid sequestrants reduce cholesterol transport to the liver and can be used in combination. Niacin is very effective at lowering LDL, beyond its ability to raise high-density lipoprotein and shift LDL particle size to a less atherogenic type. When statins cannot be tolerated at all, red yeast rice can be used if proper formulations of the product are obtained. Nutrients can also be added to the diet, including plant stanols and sterols, soy protein, almonds, and fiber, either individually or all together as a portfolio diet. A clear understanding of how each of these strategies works is essential for effective results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey G Shanes
- Clinical Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Melrose Park, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Evaluation of safety and tolerance of microencapsulated Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 in a yogurt formulation: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50:2216-23. [PMID: 22425689 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2012] [Revised: 03/01/2012] [Accepted: 03/05/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Probiotic organisms have shown promise in treating diseases. Previously, we have reported on the efficacy of microencapsulated Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 in a yogurt formulation at lowering serum cholesterol levels in otherwise healthy hypercholesterolemic adults. This study investigates the safety and toxicology of oral ingestion of microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 in a yogurt formulation. A randomized group of 120 subjects received a dose of 5 × 10(10) CFU microencapsulated L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 in yogurt (n=59) or placebo yogurt (n=61) twice/day for 6 weeks. Clinical chemistry and hematological parameters of safety were analyzed. Fecal samples were collected at these time points for the analysis of deconjugated bile acids. The frequency, duration and intensity of adverse events (AEs) and clinical significance of safety parameters were recorded for both groups. No clinically significant differences between the probiotic yogurt and placebo yogurt treated groups were detected in either the blood clinical chemistry or hematology results and there was no significant increase in fecal deconjugated bile acids (P>0.05) between treated and control groups. The frequency and intensity of AEs was similar in the two groups. These results demonstrate the safe use of this formulation in food.
Collapse
|